Hello misc, I've appreciated all answers.
the kernel is GENERIC. My complex setup is many networks, pf rules , Vans
and a route to all. ( route add )
If I execute: - nmap -sV -T4 -O -F 10.20.0/16 ( I'm at 10.20.76 )
the follow error ocurs:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:48:49PM -0200, R0me0 *** wrote:
Hello misc :)
I'm running a full patched OpenBSD 4.4 with very complex setup, and I'm
planning an upgrade to 5.0.
At this moment, if I execute nmap 10.20.0/16, I have a dbg . I've limited
the number of max connections and connections
On 01/24/2012 07:48 PM, R0me0 *** wrote:
Hello misc :)
I'm running a full patched OpenBSD 4.4 with very complex setup, and I'm
planning an upgrade to 5.0.
At this moment, if I execute nmap 10.20.0/16, I have a dbg . I've limited
the number of max connections and connections per seconds, that
It is a GENERIC kernel, the name is only copy of GENERIC.MP :) . As I said,
it is a complex setup and I'm planning an upgrade.
Cheers,
Em 24 de janeiro de 2012 16:10, Rares Aioanei bsdlis...@gmail.comescreveu:
On 01/24/2012 07:48 PM, R0me0 *** wrote:
Hello misc :)
I'm running a full
R0me0 *** knight.neo at gmail.com writes:
It is a GENERIC kernel, the name is only copy of GENERIC.MP :) . As I said,
it is a complex setup and I'm planning an upgrade.
OpenBSD 4.4 (TENMA.MP) #3: Tue Jan 24 00:46:50 BRST 2012
root at
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:35 AM, R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote:
It is a GENERIC kernel, the name is only copy of GENERIC.MP :) . As I said,
it is a complex setup and I'm planning an upgrade.
Well, you're doing the right thing. There have been *MANY* fixes to
the network stack since
Doc,
It hurts when I do that...
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:35 AM, R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote:
It is a GENERIC kernel, the name is only copy of GENERIC.MP :) . As I
said,
it is a complex setup
I'm not trying to help you not upgrade but my 4.9 box says
Starting Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-01-24 15:13 CST
Failed to resolve given hostname/IP: 10.20.0. Note that you can't use
'/mask' AND '1-4,7,100-' style IP ranges
WARNING: No targets were specified, so 0 hosts scanned.
Nmap
If you disable ddb it should print out a stack trace and attempt
to dump to disk. Either of these might give information that could
help track it down, though it might not do you any good, the areas
you're most likely to run into problems have had *huge* changes
since 4.4.
On 2012-01-24, R0me0
On 2012-01-24, R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running a full patched OpenBSD 4.4 with very complex setup
I recommend simplifying the setup.
On 24/01/12 16:35 -0200, R0me0 *** wrote:
It is a GENERIC kernel, the name is only copy of GENERIC.MP :) . As I said,
it is a complex setup and I'm planning an upgrade.
Cheers,
Why on earth would you rename GENERIC?! Especially given the official amount
of support for OpenBSD running kernels
R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com writes:
I'm running a full patched OpenBSD 4.4 with very complex setup, and I'm
planning an upgrade to 5.0.
That's a seriously long jump, but then again, that upgrade may very well
be a blessing in disguise -- an opportunity to identify what parts of
your complex
From http://www.openbsd.org/security.html :
OpenBSD 4.5 and earlier releases are not supported anymore. The
following paragraphs only list advisories issued while they were
maintained; these releases are likely to be affected by the advisories
for more recent releases.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at
I saw on internet, there are the same issue on 4.6 and 4.7, but nowhere the
answer how to
-Message d'origine-
From http://www.openbsd.org/security.html :
OpenBSD 4.5 and earlier releases are not supported anymore. The following
paragraphs only list advisories issued while they were
2010/6/18, Rioux, Christophe cri...@viseo.net:
Hi
We tried to implemant a monitoring on a OpenBSD 4.4; I get an error message:
index not found (monitoring via Cacti, means net-snmp). My Cacti server is
hosted on another server.
So do we, our cacti is 0.8.7e, from some redhat repository quite
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Dan Harnettdan...@harnett.name wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:19:09PM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
According to the /usr/share/sendmail/README file, it is necessary to
add the a modifier to the line that define the MSA: Additionally, by
using
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 07:33:15AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
Hmm, this seems to not match the documentation in
/usr/share/doc/smm/08.sendmailop: the meaning you give for the 'a' and
'l' flags are correct for the srv_features ruleset, but not for the
DaemonPortOptions option.
My mistake.
Hi,
I added the FEATURE(`delay_checks') in the .mc file, keep it the line
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Address=0.0.0.0, Port=587, Name=MSA
M=Ea')dnl and it seems everything is so far so good. I take note about the
file on /usr/share/doc/smm/08.sendmailop too.
Thanks so much both of you.
Hi,
The openbsd-proto.mc file has these lines:
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Address=0.0.0.0, Name=MTA')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Address=::, Name=MTA6, M=O')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Address=0.0.0.0, Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E')dnl
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:19:09PM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
According to the /usr/share/sendmail/README file, it is necessary to
add the a modifier to the line that define the MSA: Additionally, by
using the M=a modifier you can require authentication before messages
are
* Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info [2009-03-10 20:00]:
OpenBSD does not currently support 4GB of RAM.
that is not true.
OpenBSD does not currently support more than 4GB of RAM on amd64, that
is true.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Why are you asking question again? I googled your original
question... damn it
http://n2.nabble.com/OpenBSD-4.4-amd64-bsd.mp-can%27t-detect-16GB-memory-td24
57053.html
Took me less time find it than it took for you to e-mail...
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 13:13, Prakshep Dineshchandra Patel
ppate...@stevens.edu wrote:
Hi all
i check again and i installed openbsd 4.4 amd
I just forgot to mention that,
When i run the custom kernel (e.g. bsd44.bigmem) the output is
similar to the stock kernel.
Prakshep Dineshchandra Patel wrote:
Hi all
i check again and i installed openbsd 4.4 amd
64. I compiled kernel again and i got dmsg. (i thing those are same)
what i
On 2009-03-17, Prakshep Dineshchandra Patel ppate...@stevens.edu wrote:
Hi all
i check again and i installed openbsd 4.4 amd
64. I compiled kernel again and i got dmsg. (i thing those are same)
what i did,
set 'int bigmem = 1;' in 'arch/amd64/amd64/machdep.c' (Though it
already set to 1
Prakshep Dineshchandra Patel wrote:
Hi every one,
I have installed OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 on Dell PowerEdge 1950 which
contain 16GB of ram.
As in that kernel 'BigMem' is already set to 1. But during boot time I
can see 4GB instead of 16GB ram.
When I use 'Top' command it will shows
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:07:55 -0400 (EDT)
Prakshep Dineshchandra Patel ppate...@stevens.edu wrote:
Hi every one,
I have installed OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 on Dell PowerEdge 1950 which
contain 16GB of ram.
As in that kernel 'BigMem' is already set to 1. But during boot time I
can see 4GB
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:39:50 +0700, Esa Kuusisto esa.kuusi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
I have samekind of panic problems with two different openbgp routers.
All I get panic: rtfree 2 before dump. I was searching if someone else
have samekind of problem via google and you're only one. My only
Yes. Sorry for the self-contradiction. It's been a long day.
Just to be sure, I re-installed Ubuntu, and I'm currently doing a
system software upgrade with one NIC, and am logged in over the other
NIC and running top. (Plus it sees the onboard NIC, but I don't have
anything plugged into that.)
John Schofield schrieb:
I'm new to OpenBSD, so I may be doing something stupid. But Google,
the FAQ, and other resources have not shed any light.
I'm attempting to set up an IBM ThinkCentre desktop PC as a
router/firewall for my home network. OpenBSD did not recognize the
onboard NIC, and it
Thanks very much, Dorian, Stijn, and Stuart:
I upgraded to 4.4-Current dated February 6. No change in symptoms.
It occurred to me that I had eliminated hardware problems with the
cards, but not with the PCI slots. So I moved /etc/hostname.re0 to
/root, and booted with re1 enabled. Freeze.
Next
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:51 PM, John Mark Schofield r...@sudosu.net wrote:
This is looking to me like a bad slot on the motherboard. Which
stinks, as this machine is out of warranty. Anyone have any further
troubleshooting suggestions?
Didn't you state earlier that you had tried the system
Hi!
Wouldn't it be better to not use the bridge and use (multicast-)routing
and pf to solve your problem?
Multicast routing with dvrmpd is tested with pf, does not work. the
same thing happens, if streamX is allowed to pass out on vlanX and
streamY is allowed to pass out on vlanY, result is
Am Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:57:59 + (UTC)
schrieb Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org:
On 2009-01-20, u...@o3si.de u...@o3si.de wrote:
as the FAQ http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath states:
It's worth noting that if an interface used by a multipath route
goes down (i.e.,
Key Aavoja schrieb:
Hello,
Hello,
first thing: I do not have any experience with multicast traffic.
But what you have build seems very strange to me. First you use vlan to
separate the networks an then you put them alltogether with a bridge.
I do not see the use of the vlans.
Wouldn't it be
On 2009-01-20, Guido Tschakert guido.tschak...@src-gmbh.de wrote:
first thing: I do not have any experience with multicast traffic.
But what you have build seems very strange to me. First you use vlan to
separate the networks an then you put them alltogether with a bridge.
I do not see the use
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:04:36PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
Hi,
I need a help to configure an openBSD server to load balance and failover
internet connection.
I have 2 connections to the internet.
I followed http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing but i didn4t get
Hi,
I need a help to configure an openBSD server to load balance and
failover internet connection.
I have 2 connections to the internet.
I followed http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing but i
didn4t get it working.
I added both routes with:
route add -mpath default
Quoting Guido Tschakert guido.tschak...@src-gmbh.de:
Key Aavoja schrieb:
Hello,
Hello,
first thing: I do not have any experience with multicast traffic.
But what you have build seems very strange to me. First you use vlan to
separate the networks an then you put them alltogether with a
Quoting Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org:
On 2009-01-20, Guido Tschakert guido.tschak...@src-gmbh.de wrote:
first thing: I do not have any experience with multicast traffic.
But what you have build seems very strange to me. First you use vlan to
separate the networks an then you put them
On 2009-01-20, Key Aavoja k...@neoon.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to not use the bridge and use (multicast-)routing
and pf to solve your problem?
Multicast routing with dvrmpd is tested with pf, does not work. the
same thing happens, if streamX is allowed to pass out on vlanX and
streamY
On 2009-01-20, u...@o3si.de u...@o3si.de wrote:
as the FAQ http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath states:
It's worth noting that if an interface used by a multipath route goes
down (i.e., loses carrier), the kernel will still try to forward
packets using the route that points to that
Quoting Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org:
On 2009-01-20, Key Aavoja k...@neoon.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to not use the bridge and use (multicast-)routing
and pf to solve your problem?
Multicast routing with dvrmpd is tested with pf, does not work. the
same thing happens, if
Owain Ainsworth wrote:
Enabling bigmem=1:
Also, from sys/arch/amd64/amd64/machdep.c:
/* Tweakable by config(8) */
How?
That diff was never commited. Config needs to know about it before it
can change it.
I did a similar config(8) patch for when PAE was in the same situation,
so if
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 07:34:07PM +0100, Markus Hennecke wrote:
Raimo Niskanen schrieb:
[config description]
But how to find a bigmem parameter I do not know, I have
no amd64 system. Try 'help' in the config editor.
And, as pointed out before:
If you search the archives, you'll
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Stephan A. Rickauer
stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:52 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:43 AM, C. Soragan Ong sora...@guox.net wrote:
so let say put set bigmem=1 into /etc/boot.conf will activate the bigmem?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:32:57AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Stephan A. Rickauer
stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:52 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:43 AM, C. Soragan Ong sora...@guox.net wrote:
so let
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:30:48PM +0900, Jordi Beltran Creix wrote:
Enabling bigmem=1:
-real mem = 3734757376 (3561MB)
-avail mem = 3624775680 (3456MB)
+real mem = 4271632384 (4073MB)
+avail mem = 4148350976 (3956MB)
Also, from sys/arch/amd64/amd64/machdep.c:
/* Tweakable by
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:43:46PM +0800, C. Soragan Ong wrote:
so let say put set bigmem=1 into /etc/boot.conf will activate the bigmem?
correct me if i am wrong, i am new with openbsd :)
Ok.
No, you run something like config -e /bsd -o /bsd.new.
This will put you in an interactive editor
Raimo Niskanen schrieb:
[config description]
But how to find a bigmem parameter I do not know, I have
no amd64 system. Try 'help' in the config editor.
And, as pointed out before:
If you search the archives, you'll find the clue you need to enable it
on your own system.
See also:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:43 AM, C. Soragan Ong sora...@guox.net wrote:
so let say put set bigmem=1 into /etc/boot.conf will activate the bigmem?
correct me if i am wrong, i am new with openbsd :)
the only permanent way to set that is to change the source and recompile.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Markus Hennecke
markus-henne...@markus-hennecke.de wrote:
So I read all that before and now I have to out me as plain stupid. I still
have no clue how to set bigmem to 1 using config(8). And as you can see in
this thread, it looks like I am not alone. Either I
yeah, that was my mistake. i could've sworn i've set bigmem that way
to avoid a recompile... i'll shut up now.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Markus Hennecke
markus-henne...@markus-hennecke.de wrote:
So I read all
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:52 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:43 AM, C. Soragan Ong sora...@guox.net wrote:
so let say put set bigmem=1 into /etc/boot.conf will activate the bigmem?
correct me if i am wrong, i am new with openbsd :)
the only permanent way to set that is
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 07:39 -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
no. the config program can do this without a recompile.
I also would like to learn how to do that since we have a couple of
'big' amd64 machines I could test on.
Cheers,
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
so let say put set bigmem=1 into /etc/boot.conf will activate the bigmem?
correct me if i am wrong, i am new with openbsd :)
Regards,
Soragan
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Stephan A. Rickauer
stephan.ricka...@ini.phys.ethz.ch wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 07:39 -0800, Chris Kuethe wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:40:44PM +0800, C. Soragan Ong wrote:
| Hi All,
|
| I am using OpenBSD 4.4 and is having problem detecting 4GB ram. Below is the
| dmesg
Well, all memory is found (see the spdmem entries in your dmesg), but
not all of it is supported by the default kernel. You'll have
Chris Kuethe schrieb:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl wrote:
You'll have to
enable bigmem
yes.
and compile a new kernel yourself.
no. the config program can do this without a recompile.
I have seen the comment in machdep.c, but it looks like I am to
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl wrote:
You'll have to
enable bigmem
yes.
and compile a new kernel yourself.
no. the config program can do this without a recompile.
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
Hello,
On Mon, 15.12.2008 at 15:47:06 +0100, Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:40:44PM +0800, C. Soragan Ong wrote:
| I am using OpenBSD 4.4 and is having problem detecting 4GB ram. Below is the
| dmesg
Well, all memory is found (see the spdmem entries in
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:40:44 +0800
C. Soragan Ong sora...@guox.net wrote:
Hi All,
I am using OpenBSD 4.4 and is having problem detecting 4GB ram. Below is the
dmesg
OpenBSD 4.4 (GENERIC.MP) #1812: Tue Aug 12 17:22:53 MDT 2008
Greets
Denny Thanks for pointing out I had not CC'ed the misc list.
So here is the full reply with the solution I found for 7.3 - How do I
clear the console each time a user logs out?
problem. See the second to last post for my solution. The FAQ just needs
to be updated.
Bret
Denny White
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 03:56:21PM -0700, Bret spoke thusly:
Greetings
I have been running OpenBSD as a firewall/router since 2.5 and have
never had any problem with Clearing the console each time a user logs
out. I have just installed 4.4 on a system that was running 4.0. I did a
Greets:
I have found where the FAQ was needed to be updated ;D
I looked in ttys and found that it was using the getty std,9600 instead
of the getty Pc.
Sorry for the trouble,
Bret
Bret wrote:
Greetings
I have been running OpenBSD as a firewall/router since 2.5 and have
never had
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Richard Toohey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a couple of Dell SC440s with the same sort of set-up, and
no problems here.
Two 500Gb drives, wd0 and wd1:
I have resolved this issue. I tried the installation again and this
time selected fdisk before selecting
2) in an earlier message you indicated that there was some kind of
RAID on this system, I think it is safe to say that it is a BIOS-assisted
software RAID, which COULD be causing you problems if it is still
configured in the BIOS. And even if it isn't causing this problem,
it WILL bite you
Just because you have a cheap 500G disk doesn't mean you
need to allocate all or most of it. For one, the bigger the disk,
the longer it takes to fsck after you trip over the power cord.
Wait for fsck? So OpenBSD doesn't have background fsck? :-(
On 1/12/2008, at 9:24 AM, Chris wrote:
2) in an earlier message you indicated that there was some kind of
RAID on this system, I think it is safe to say that it is a BIOS-
assisted
software RAID, which COULD be causing you problems if it is still
configured in the BIOS. And even if it isn't
Chris wrote:
I'm trying to install OBSD 4.4-release on this desktop which has two
hard disks of around 465 GB each. If I install on wd0 with only one
partition (/) of 10GB, the installation goes smoothly. But if I try to
allocate /tmp (20g), /home (100g), / (50g), /var (50g), /usr (50g),
swap
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
Are any of you using AICCU on OpenBSD 4.4 patched to 005? Have you
experienced panics? Since I upgraded to OpenBSD 4.4, whenever I take
AICCU down, then up, after a while the system panics. I can
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
Are any of you using AICCU on OpenBSD 4.4 patched to 005? Have you
experienced panics? Since I upgraded to OpenBSD 4.4,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
Are any of you using AICCU on OpenBSD 4.4 patched to 005? Have you
experienced panics? Since I upgraded to OpenBSD 4.4,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of you using AICCU on OpenBSD 4.4 patched to
2008/11/2 James R. Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for all of your hard work! I really enjoyed the song in this release
also.
Haha, may the source be with you!!
--
This e-mail may be confidential. You may not copy, forward or use any
part. All disclaimers on the Internet are of zero legal
David Schulz-5 wrote:
yes, its awesome this time !
That's like telling your wife, You look beautiful... today. It's better to
leave off the last part. It's awesome will suffice.
--
View this message in context:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:26 AM, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Schulz-5 wrote:
yes, its awesome this time !
That's like telling your wife, You look beautiful... today. It's better to
leave off the last part. It's awesome will suffice.
I _think_ the reference was to the song. I have
There is a problem in installation
install: /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/obj/src/modules/proxy/libproxy.so: No such
file or directory
But I can't find any problem with compilation...
Any idea ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pc
Nicolas
Sent:
Yes I'm sure !
It is a weird problem...
In fact httpd does not proxy anything even with a successful compilation.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
disintx
Sent: jeudi 6 novembre 2008 03:05
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.4
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:03:37PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:59:29PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install
Hi
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first disk without any issue, and then try following
commands:
disklabel wd0 disklabel.wd1
fdisk -i wd1
disklabel -R -r wd1
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:03:37PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Sorry, this does seem ok in 4.3. (An example in
the FAQ uses a relative path, and that's what I've
always done.)
It only seems ok in 4.3 *if you ignore the
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William Boshuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, thanks, and sorry if I seem to have suggested
otherwise. The man page says that if I use a
relative path then newfs will do the right thing
(use the corresponding raw device), and that's
the form of the command in
Are you certain that /var/www/proxy/ is writeable by the server?
i.e. what is the owner/group of the directory and what are the permissions?
Pc Nicolas wrote:
Hi
I try to reconfigure httpd on OpenBSD 4.4 to do reverse proxy as I did for
years following this documentation :
yes, its awesome this time !
James R. Campbell wrote:
Thanks for all of your hard work! I really enjoyed the song in this release
also.
--James
Congrats, Mr. de Raadt
2008/10/31 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nov 1, 2008.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.4.
This is our 24th release on CD-ROM (and 25th via FTP). We remain
proud of
Ross Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've download and burned the 4.4 ISO from a local mirror and trying to
upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 on i386. After the installer does the fsck
-fp, I get the following error:
uid 0 on /: file system full
/: write
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120 G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first disk without any issue, and then try following
commands:
disklabel wd0
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first disk without any issue, and then try following
commands:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:59:29PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test the
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've download and burned the 4.4 ISO from a local mirror and trying to
upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 on i386. After the installer does the fsck
-fp, I get the following error:
uid 0 on /: file system full
/: write failed; file system
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt he's trying to install stuff to the ramdisk...
Thanks all for your help.
My current OpenBSD 4.3 installation is sitting on / (/var, /home,
/root and everything else is under /) - only one partition. And I have
about
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:37:40PM -0800, Chris wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt he's trying to install stuff to the ramdisk...
Thanks all for your help.
My current OpenBSD 4.3 installation is sitting on / (/var, /home,
/root and
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
Hi
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120 G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first disk without any issue, and then try following
commands:
disklabel wd0
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Kenneth R Westerback
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:37:40PM -0800, Chris wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt he's trying to install stuff to the ramdisk...
Thanks all for your help.
My
Cheap easy fast way is to move /etc/hosts somewhere else prior to
upgrade. Not sure if things like sysmerge will help
On 11/4/08, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Kenneth R Westerback
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:37:40PM -0800, Chris
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the entries of my /etc/hosts file actually come from
http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm - it basically blackholes
unwanted sites. Is there any way I can get around the upgrade issue
without having to remove entries
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:23:20AM +1100, Chris wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Kenneth R Westerback
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:37:40PM -0800, Chris wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt he's trying to
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:13:08PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
| On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Most of the entries of my /etc/hosts file actually come from
| http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm - it basically blackholes
| unwanted sites. Is there any way I
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
