Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 06:21:57PM +0100, Adriaan wrote:
On 1/31/07, Bret Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Running and tuning OpenBSD network servers
in a production environment:
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/tuning-openbsd.ps
may have the info you're looking for.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, John wrote:
I think in OpenBSD, that sendmail is tied in rather tightly to the whole
OS. I use exim, and the way I ensure that sendmail isn't there is to
do:
in rc.conf (or rc.conf.local)
sendmail_enable=NONE
This doesn't do anything.
sendmail_flags=NO
Only this is
Hi,
Is sasyncd running reliable on isakmpd in Initiator mode (any special
settings, like timeouts etc) ?
Is sasyncd running reliable on isakmpd in Responder mode? (any special
settings, like timeouts etc) ?
Is isakmpd supposed to run 100% clean (no SA problems/tunnel timeouts)
with
On 2/1/07, David DELAVENNAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ramdas a icrit :
On 1/28/07, Josh Tolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/07, Reiner Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the next 2 weeks, a free NX client will be released which is
runs on
OpenBSD without Linux emulation. All closed
Hi,
We are running a PF based firewall (of course ;) ) and are now looking
for a solution to redirect http requests based on the hostname.
All the hostnames have the same public ip but should be redirected to
different internal servers depending on the hostname;
www.xxx.com - 192.168.0.200
Hi Jason.
Thank you very much for your advice, but I prefer stay at the
software provided in the base system if it is possible (why
choosing an operating system if we do not like the software
it provides?). ksh is a powerful shell and the default
configuration in OpenBSD makes it really useful,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:12:40AM +0100, Johan L wrote:
Not sure if this can be done by PF (don't think so though).
Is there any proxies that can manage this?
Or any other solutions?
PF cannot do this.
What you need is a reverse proxy. Apache can do that.
-- magnus
howdy,
Good morning misc@
In some private emails with gwk@, he has said
that he'd like to work on getting SMP on the
macppc platform working, but lacks a good, fast
machine with which to do the work.
what is 'fast' here?
That's where we come in. I'm looking around, and
we can get a useful
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:32:17AM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 06:21:57PM +0100, Adriaan wrote:
On 1/31/07, Bret Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Running and tuning OpenBSD network servers
in a production environment:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:17:51PM +0530, Ramdas wrote:
On 1/28/07, Josh Tolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/07, Reiner Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the next 2 weeks, a free NX client will be released which is runs on
OpenBSD without Linux emulation. All closed source parts from
I'll qoute Greg on this one:
He's asking about the 38G, not the difference between 200 and 183.
/daniel
I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since
my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh
partition that spanned the whole disk, and then
On 01 Feb 2007 12:26:09 +0100, Artur Grabowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since
my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh
partition that spanned the whole disk, and then run newfs on that
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl 0
-387620
c: 390721968 0 unused 0 0 # Cyl
Quoting Bryan Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
Obviously something is screwy. Try posting the output of 'fdisk wd1',
'disklabel wd1' and at *least* the portion of your dmesg corresponding
to the disk. No way to tell what's messed up just from df output.
I know this may sound dumb, but can you
Quoting Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl 0
-387620
c: 390721968
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:45:45AM +0200, Antti Harri wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, John wrote:
I think in OpenBSD, that sendmail is tied in rather tightly to the whole
OS. I use exim, and the way I ensure that sendmail isn't there is to
do:
in rc.conf (or rc.conf.local)
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:32:17AM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 06:21:57PM +0100, Adriaan wrote:
On 1/31/07, Bret Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Running and tuning OpenBSD network servers
in a production
Hi list,
i plan to by a a SBC for a small home server which should support IPSec
encryption.
I would like to get at least 5MB/s samba/nfs via IPSec from local disk
and the system should be low power ( 20W) and fanless.
I read that the VIA CPUs have crypto support built in.
I am a bit unsure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
1) According to www.spews.org, the text files for SPEWS level 1 and 2 have
not been updated since August, 2006.
2) There has been much discussion of this in both
news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting, and in news.admin.net-abuse.email.
3) As of today,
Hi.
Last week I got a fresh system (my old system died)
and so I had to install.
The system is a DualCore AMD64 X2 4600+ with integrated
NVIDIA NICs (nfe0 and nfe1) and build in NVIDIA RAID.
(for details see dmesg below)
The first problem I ran into was the problem with the onboard NICs.
I had
I have a little production vpn server with 28 tunnels to various
locations. Yesterday I needed to add a tunnel, there was no
/var/run/isakmpd.fifo ... odd says I. isakmpd had been running since mid
Septembe, so I justed edited the config file and hupped the controlling
process.
The fifo was
Um in case it *might* be useful information I am using OBSD 3.9 i386
though I can remember exactly when I built userland it is not the stock
from dist CD version.
Dag Richards wrote:
I have a little production vpn server with 28 tunnels to various
locations. Yesterday I needed to add a
I ordered a new Dell SC440 , with the pentium D and the infamous
broadcom bcm5754 (or is it 5787?) . I started off with OpenBSD 4.0
release, then noticed a kernel panic on reboot. This was a consistent
repeatable problem, and after googling I noticed other people having
the same problem and some
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:29:46PM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
Hi list,
i plan to by a a SBC for a small home server which should support IPSec
encryption.
I would like to get at least 5MB/s samba/nfs via IPSec from local disk
and the system should be low power ( 20W) and fanless.
I
On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048
Bob Beck wrote:
Yeah, probably time to retire spews, they aren't going
to fix it.
Aside from my traplist (which I'll add) anyone have
any suggestions for useful addtions when I commit this? I seldom
use exernally maintained blacklists anymore :)
-Bob
Not that it
On 2/1/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:17:51PM +0530, Ramdas wrote:
On 1/28/07, Josh Tolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/07, Reiner Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the next 2 weeks, a free NX client will be released which is runs on
OpenBSD
Greg Thomas wrote:
On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a:
Hi
I have a openbsd server using pools and load balanced betheen two dsl
lines, using the same pf.conf that the pf oficial tutorial:
I need to have a dns cache server in the openbsd box, but the server
not have route to internet itself.
If add a default route to the server the pools not works
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
Yeah, probably time to retire spews, they aren't going
to fix it.
Aside from my traplist (which I'll add) anyone have
any suggestions for useful addtions when I commit this? I seldom
use exernally maintained blacklists anymore :)
-Bob
Not that
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:38:37 -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote
May be if there was a way to distribute one own addition only may be
a good idea as then we could merge traplist from multiple locations
if one wants to do this. I wouldn't have any objection to make mine
available if that help.
Greetings.
Is there a commonly known cause of *return* TCP/IP traffic
to reach but be dropped rather than passed back across a
bridge (ala bridgename.bridge0) but... get this... only on
the first try?
I'd like to get into a detailed explanation of the network
topology I'm working with here but
Hi everyone,
I am thinking about buying this raid solution for a small server. Has
anyone had experience with this device on OpenBSD? Any comment would
be welcome.
Also I noticed something that caught my attention...
At the address:
Hi,
On 2/2/07, Jonathan Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to get into a detailed explanation of the network
topology I'm working with here but I don't want to scare off
anyone by opening with a 3 page email.
Your subject implies that you built a layer-2 LAN-to-LAN bridge over
an
I've read the manpage and Googled but to no avail - could trunk(4) be
used to aggregate interfaces on separate networks? For example, say I
have a pair of internet connections and I'd like to set up a failover
or roundrobin between the two... would trunk(4) be able to handle this
or would another
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Nathan Johnson wrote:
I ordered a new Dell SC440 , with the pentium D and the infamous
broadcom bcm5754 (or is it 5787?) . I started off with OpenBSD 4.0
release, then noticed a kernel panic on reboot. This was a consistent
repeatable problem, and after googling I noticed
Both boxes and fiber NICs work fine under Solaris 9 using Syskonnect's
proprietary skge driver and a short cross-over fiber patch.
So it is definitely not an issue with with the hardware setup, but with OpenBSD.
I'll have the fiber NICs for another 10 days before I'll deploy them
in a customer's
38 matches
Mail list logo
