Hi list,
I'm trying to make OpenBSD live CD 3.9, I've read this article
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/07/14/openbsd_live.html and trying
to follow it, but when I start compiling RAMDISK it stops with this error:
/mnt: write failed, file system is full
dd: /mnt/bsd: No space left on
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:01:54AM +0200, viq wrote:
On 9/24/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 07:10:14PM +0200, Thomas Schoeller wrote:
hello all,
is it possible with ipsec.conf and ipsecctl in 3.9 to listen for a
road warrior with dynamic address. or
Hello,
It seems quite clear,
your disk is full.
Cheers,
FranC'ois
Tomas wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to make OpenBSD live CD 3.9, I've read this article
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/07/14/openbsd_live.html and
trying to follow it, but when I start compiling RAMDISK it stops with
No, there is more then enough free disk space
Francois Visconte wrote:
Hello,
It seems quite clear,
your disk is full.
Cheers,
FranC'ois
Tomas wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to make OpenBSD live CD 3.9, I've read this article
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/07/14/openbsd_live.html and
On 9/26/06, Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomas wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to make OpenBSD live CD 3.9, I've read this article
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/07/14/openbsd_live.html and
trying to follow it, but when I start compiling RAMDISK it stops with
this error:
/mnt:
Yes I'm sure, there is 5GB for my / partition and /mnt is mounted on /
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 9/26/06, Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomas wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to make OpenBSD live CD 3.9, I've read this article
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/07/14/openbsd_live.html and
On 2006/09/26 11:08, Tomas wrote:
I'm trying to make OpenBSD live CD 3.9, I've read this article
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/07/14/openbsd_live.html and trying
to follow it, but when I start compiling RAMDISK it stops with this error:
Forget 2.88MB floppy images, look at files in
Hi.
I have sensorsd running on a 4.0-current macppc.
It always worked fine and when min/max values of a sensor are
reached, a mail is sent to me.
Recently, a problem happened: each time I start the sensorsd daemon
(either on boot up or manually), I get the following warning mail:
28.00 degC
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, mickey wrote:
in some cases sensor values cannot be provided by the hw
(most drivers fail a few times a day on my machines).
in this case the sensor state is marked as unknown
or invalid. that's why you are getting your mail.
Allright, I see.
The weird thing though is
On 9/26/06, Carlos A. Garcia G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can someone external to the network get a copy of all the mail that are
getting to a mail server???
??
short answer: no
long answer: yes
please clarify your question. also, why sould this be related to openbsd?
--knitti
Can we stop with the top posting pissing matches here? You know what I
think is more of a pisser, is when you tack on 3 lines to an already over
bloated post, learn to edit. Most of us can follow threads. I don't
think it makes it any better when you put it at the bottom of a previous
post.
becose i use an obsd server and i need for help
knitti escribis:
On 9/26/06, Carlos A. Garcia G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can someone external to the network get a copy of all the mail that are
getting to a mail server???
??
short answer: no
long answer: yes
please clarify your question.
On 9/26/06, Carlos A. Garcia G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can someone external to the network get a copy of all the mail that are
getting to a mail server???
yes, if either there are bugs in software or configuration is
incorrect on the mail server, or if some insecure device is attached
to the
Hello,
I'm studying the idea of writing a python library for controling pf
internals.
Do would find it usefull to write some simple scripts for controling PF.
Is anyone think it's usefull ?
Cheers,
Frangois
On 9/26/06, fv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm studying the idea of writing a python library for controling pf
internals.
Do would find it usefull to write some simple scripts for controling PF.
Is anyone think it's usefull ?
Cheers,
Frangois
What sort of control scripts were you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fv wrote:
Hello,
I'm studying the idea of writing a python library for controling pf
internals.
Do would find it usefull to write some simple scripts for controling PF.
Is anyone think it's usefull ?
Yes and no... The largest sticking point I
Gary B. wrote:
On 9/26/06, fv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm studying the idea of writing a python library for controling pf
internals.
Do would find it usefull to write some simple scripts for controling PF.
Is anyone think it's usefull ?
Cheers,
Frangois
What sort of control scripts
On 9/26/06, Gary B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/06, fv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm studying the idea of writing a python library for controling pf
internals.
Do would find it usefull to write some simple scripts for controling PF.
Is anyone think it's usefull ?
Why not do it
Hosted Solutions based out of North Carolina mat offer what you need. They
currently have data centers in Raleigh, Charlotte and Cary North Carolina.
They are working on a fourth data center outside the state. Huge initiative
to support opensource, very competent comany with some major customers
On 9/25/06, ip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking to buy the Belink F5D7050USB 2.0 802.11b/g adapter,
listed in i386 hardware list.
Chipset Ralink RT2500 - ural driver.
And I hope it working in g mode...
Cheers,
--
ip
Argh.. I have bought it...but when I have inserted it, the message
On 2006/09/26 20:27, ip wrote:
On 9/25/06, ip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh.. I have bought it...but when I have inserted it, the message is
been:
$dmesg
ugen0 at uhub5 port 1
ugen0: Belkin USB2.0 WLAN, rev 2.00/48.10, addr 2
please, everyone: don't trim the dmesg, even if it seems to
On 9/26/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please, everyone: don't trim the dmesg, even if it seems to you that
most of is irrelevant. You definitely removed one important piece of
information: the exact version of OpenBSD in use. You may have removed
something else useful too,
The stanza describing WIFCONTINUED has a close parenthesis, but no
corresponding open parenthesis. The WIFSTOPPED description doesn't
parenthesize the statement describing when the macro can evaluate to
true, so this shouldn't be parenthesized either.
--- wait.2~ Tue Sep 26 14:55:36 2006
+++
In the FAQ for building a kernel:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Building
After the make, it says to do a make install.
In the section about following stable:
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html#building
It instead says to backup the old kernel move the new kernel into the
right place.
Yes!
On 9/26/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the FAQ for building a kernel:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Building
After the make, it says to do a make install.
In the section about following stable:
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html#building
It instead says to backup
On 9/26/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the FAQ for building a kernel:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Building
After the make, it says to do a make install.
In the section about following stable:
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html#building
It instead says to backup the old
[I reordered the text, so your answer is below my question, I think this
is more readable]
On 9/26/06, Carlos A. Garcia G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
knitti escribis:
On 9/26/06, Carlos A. Garcia G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can someone external to the network get a copy of all the mail that are
* Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-26 22:36]:
Having just done it with make install for the first time, I'd always
copied and moved it manually, it looks like it saves the previous
kernel as /obsd.
it actually replaces the kernel atomically by doing
mv /path/to/new/bsd /nbsd rm /obsd
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-26 22:36]:
Having just done it with make install for the first time, I'd always
copied and moved it manually, it looks like it saves the previous
kernel as /obsd.
it actually replaces the kernel atomically by doing
mv
On 2006/09/26 21:53, ip wrote:
I have already told of system's version: 3.9. However I agree with
you, and this is my dmesg:
much better, thanks. 3.9 GENERIC i386 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a
lot more information than just saying 3.9.
port 1 addr 2: high speed, power 500 mA, config 1,
The idea behind this is more to create a replacement for pfvar.h and
ioctl in python (see pf(4) ).
Walking throught the spamd and expirtable code and some other network
tools interacting with pf API, i saw that manipulating ioctl was
efficient but why not create a python API to do that.
That
;)
Sorry ok the problem it is this someone told my boss that the email
messages has been readed by someone else this information came from our
isp we have a e1 connection its like a t1 connection so with that
information they said that the hacker redirect the messages before
they get to the
On 9/26/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
much better, thanks. 3.9 GENERIC i386 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a
lot more information than just saying 3.9.
right :)
port 1 addr 2: high speed, power 500 mA, config 1, USB2.0
WLAN(0x705c), Belkin(0x050d), rev 48.10
The FCC ID
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:57:48 +0200
ip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: On 9/26/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: much better, thanks. 3.9 GENERIC i386 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a
: lot more information than just saying 3.9.
:
: right :)
:
: port 1 addr 2: high speed, power
Will H. Backman wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-26 22:36]:
Having just done it with make install for the first time, I'd always
copied and moved it manually, it looks like it saves the previous
kernel as /obsd.
it actually replaces the kernel
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:33:53PM -0700, Carlos A. Garcia G. wrote:
knitti escribis:
[I reordered the text, so your answer is below my question, I think this
is more readable]
Seconded.
On 9/26/06, Carlos A. Garcia G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
knitti escribis:
On 9/26/06, Carlos A.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:32:30 -0700
Peter Hessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:57:48 +0200
: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: : On 9/26/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: :
: : much better, thanks. 3.9 GENERIC i386 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a
: : lot more
On 9/13/06, Martin Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
I use transparent proxy, but I have some machines that should access
some subnets without proxy, in order to gain access to some
applications. When I allow the straight connection to these subnets
only the
I have just installed OpenBSD 3.9 on a net4511. My root partition is
read-only, and I have a tarball unzipped into an mfs partition for /var upon
boot. /dev/ttyp00-01 and /dev/ptyp00-01 are symlinked to /var/dev so that
they are r/w. At the login prompt over the serial console I am able to log
in
39 matches
Mail list logo
