Re: C unit tests seen by OpenBSD developpers

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Bruno Carnazzi wrote: > Hi misc, > > I'm currently learning C. In many languages, you hear lots of stuff > likes 'unit testing', 'refactoring', 'agile programming' and > others... It seems that these techniques are not very present in C These techniques (minus the hype fa

C unit tests seen by OpenBSD developpers

Hi misc, I'm currently learning C. In many languages, you hear lots of stuff likes 'unit testing', 'refactoring', 'agile programming' and others... It seems that these techniques are not very present in C programming (whereas check framework is in packages, it seems too complex) Looking quickl

Re: testing HFCS

On 10/13/06, S t i n g r a y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: altq on $extif hfsc bandwidth 640Kb queue {others www msn https smtp} whats happening ? should it limit it to 188Kb fixed ? as i set the upperlimit. I'm going to guess you're queueing on the wrong interface. -- Jon

Re: IPX

ok, no one answered me but It's ok, it's working thanks Stuart 2006/10/13, Ricardo Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Ok, I never did that, so I need some help here, that's what I'm supposed > to do: > > ifconfig bridge0 create > brconfig bridge0 add vr0 > brconfig bridge0 add vr1 > brconfig bridge0

Re: HP nc8230 issues on -current

> Last, I often get messages stating "bdwrite: force async write on the > buffer 0xda6d4c18" (varying numbers). Google/MARC doesn't seem to show > anything. This is temporary debugging code for a new fix that is in the snapshots. Ignore it ;)

Re: armish fdisk/disklabel free sectors

> Speaking of zaurus -- any way to get a com0 on this thing? You have to buy the special Zaurus adapter for this. It is a little bit hard to find. If you do so, you can even use it as a serial console. > Would be nice to plug into a conserver for debugging and bug posts, > I've had a few panics

HP nc8230 issues on -current

I'm trying to set up -current on an HP nc8230 laptop, dmesg at end of message. I'm having some network trouble. When connected by wired Ethernet, running /etc/netstart won't get an IP address (via dhcp). However, if I just run "dhclient bge0" I get an address without a problem. Secondly, when c

Re: armish fdisk/disklabel free sectors

On 10/13/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006/10/13 16:50, Jeff Quast wrote: > On 10/13/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >installing OpenBSD/armish on an n2100 I had to manually fdisk > > >(12V 5A made by Seasonic) draws approx 15W (39VA) at idle, > >18W (43VA)

testing HFCS

sorry for bothering you guys again. but something seems wrong . i have a 640Kbps internet connection & as you can see i have limit Http traffic to 188Kb upperlimit altq on $extif hfsc bandwidth 640Kb queue {others www msn https smtp} queue others bandwidth 128Kb hfsc( default realtime(128Kb 1000

Re: Oldest Server you run

On 2006/10/12 at 11:08:21PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: [ ... ] > I can't believe people with PIIs and PIIIs even responded to this > thread, however. You GOT to be kidding me...That ain't old. That's > almost as new as I get! Well ... it is the "you run" part which is limiting

Re: Fwd: Oldest Server you run

On 2006/10/12 at 05:04:10PM -0400, Jason Crawford wrote: > And I ment to send this to the whole list A nuisance, having the "From: " set to the individual poster, not the list, isn't it? [ ... ] > Oldest machine I had running (until I moved to an appartment that > can't accomod

Re: OpenBSD 3.9 on an old mac g4

Am Freitag, 13. Oktober 2006 23:29 schrieb Mike Cody: > I have an old mac g4 that I was able to install 3.9 on. The > computer has a 28g hard drive in it, but during install it will > only let me partition about 8g of the space. Do you have any idea > why this could be? > > > > Thanks > : Mike

Re: Actual network chipset

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:43:17PM +0200, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > Hi all, > I wish to know actually which chipset this board has on, since the > spec sheet says it has to be a RTL8110S-32 but after seeing the dmesg > output I'm not so sure right now. > > This is from a 4.0-CURRENT from mid of S

Re: [ami] Unable to set "Hot Spare" on MegaRAID SATA 300-8x

Do you have a BBU on that card? No BBU, and I *am* set to WriteThru. I haven't had any stability problems at all. One other question, when you say you replace the manually failed drive, are you using an absolute virgin disk? I seem to recall that the card might "remember" the disk as a prev

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On 10/13/06, Ingo Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Even if you already have the CD, think twice before putting it into production before the release has officially been announced: Are you really sure no fixes are required for your purposes? You need to consider this question both for the bas

OpenBSD 3.9 on an old mac g4

I have an old mac g4 that I was able to install 3.9 on. The computer has a 28g hard drive in it, but during install it will only let me partition about 8g of the space. Do you have any idea why this could be? Thanks : Mike Cody : Systems Admin : www.ad2.com

Re: armish fdisk/disklabel free sectors

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Jeff Quast wrote: > Hi Stuart, SNIP > This machine looks really fun though! Thanks for the power stats, too! > > > obio0 at mainbus0 > > com0 at obio0 addr 0xfe80 intr 28: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > com0: console > > I don't mind soldering -- but soldering what? Is this fo

Re: armish fdisk/disklabel free sectors

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Stuart Henderson wrote: > runs ok with 512MB RAM borrowed from my main desktop machine, > I don't have any larger stick to try it with (the RAM controller > in the 80219 is meant to support 1GB of DDR ECC RAM, but I don't > know what this board supports). much nicer for port-b

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

Sigfred Heversen wrote on Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:14:42PM +0200: > On Friday 13 October 2006 20:22, Stefan Klein wrote: >> Just a shy question - if version 4 CDs have been shipped already, >> there *should* be a downloadable version laying around somewhere, >> shouldn't it ? > Those pre-ordering

Re: armish fdisk/disklabel free sectors

On 2006/10/13 16:50, Jeff Quast wrote: > On 10/13/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >installing OpenBSD/armish on an n2100 I had to manually fdisk > > INSTALL.armish in the fdisk section says "Write some good explaination > here...", so maybe this is known -- but nobody has written

Re: [ami] Unable to set "Hot Spare" on MegaRAID SATA 300-8x

On 10/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] That is, I am running firmware version 813G. [According to the LSILogic website, it was released on 2005.03.11, and is now 5 versions old.] I've got a spare with 813G, and my production one is 813J, fixed a few little issues. Do you have a BBU on that card? Wit

Re: armish fdisk/disklabel free sectors

Hi Stuart, On 10/13/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: installing OpenBSD/armish on an n2100 I had to manually fdisk INSTALL.armish in the fdisk section says "Write some good explaination here...", so maybe this is known -- but nobody has written a good section for this. (12V 5A

Re: best hardware plattform for openbsd

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 05:16:05PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > Hi Claudio, > > first, I'd like to thank you for your comment. > > On Fri, 13.10.2006 at 16:00:55 +0200, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 500kpps sustained is a crazy amount of packets (especially think about > > possible

Re: Kismet - Propably problems with ath0 (IBM brand)?

Hi. On 10/13/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > to the kismet developers. Unfortunately, i've no ath(4) available. I'll see wether I can do something next week. I'll also drop a mail to upstream. It would be nice if other people could verify wether this is really ath(4) specific

Re: [ami] Unable to set "Hot Spare" on MegaRAID SATA 300-8x

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-29 20:21]: > I'm trying to make a spare drive the "hot spare", without rebooting my > OpenBSD 3.9 server. Bioctl is letting me at least query my raid array, > but it's not letting me set an "Unused" drive to "Hot Spare": there's bugs with -H in 3.9, current hs it bet

Re: IPX

Ok, I never did that, so I need some help here, that's what I'm supposed to do: ifconfig bridge0 create brconfig bridge0 add vr0 brconfig bridge0 add vr1 brconfig bridge0 up vr0 is my inside network and vr1 is the card that connects me to the other network. with that commands I've and bridge, ri

Re: Kismet - Propably problems with ath0 (IBM brand)?

> Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:00:09PM +0200, Andreas Maus wrote: >> It was already mentioned a while ago: >> >> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=115548207902728&w=2 >> >> Due to the lack of a recent mailinglist (only a forum) I didn't report >> this >> to the kismet developers.

PC Online - WWW.PCONLINELUJAN.COM.AR - Conectividad Asegurada

PcFedeNormalPcFede9252006-10-13T13:31:00Z2006-10-13T14:19:00Z13341904pconline 15323389.2812 21 AMPLIE SU CONECTIVIDAD BAJE SUS COSTOS EXTIENDA SU RED DISTRIBUYA INTERNET 100% COMPATIBLE CON VOIP De mi mayor consideracisn: PC Online , es una empresa dedicada exclusivamente a responder

Re: Older BSD releases

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Austin Hook wrote: > Hi Ralph, >All the older issues from 3.3 up to 3.9 are available on CD from the > OpenBSD website, and all are in stock. Some previous versions are > available on the mirrors, but not a continuous set from 3.3 to present. I have some influence over t

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

Stefan Klein wrote: Just a shy question - if version 4 CDs have been shipped already, there *should* be a downloadable version laying around somewhere, shouldn't it ? Nope. You want it early, you by the CD or you wait on the release date that will be November 1. (:> What's the fun of orderi

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Stefan Klein wrote: > Just a shy question - if version 4 CDs have been shipped already, there > *should* be a downloadable version laying around somewhere, shouldn't it ? No but you can build your own release by using the CVS tag for 4.0. I take it you have pre-ordered your

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On Friday 13 October 2006 20:22, Stefan Klein wrote: > Just a shy question - if version 4 CDs have been shipped already, there > *should* be a downloadable version laying around somewhere, shouldn't it ? Those pre-ordering the CD sets gets a preferential treatment ;-) Sometimes Theo is extra nice

acpi

Thanks for all the reports that have been trickling in. We have drawn one major conclusion at the moment and that is that the evaluator is having some issues with IBM thinkpads. Jordan and I both don't know anyone with one of these so if someone could lend us one (with serial port) for a few days

Re: Cannot login into OpenSSH after applying patch 020_ssh2.patch to OpenBSD 3.8 stable

Tobias Weisserth wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I just patched OpenSSH on OpenBSD 3.8 and restarted OpenSSH. > > Now I can't login anymore using public/private key authentication. > > I get this on the client side: > > Enter passphrase for key '/Users/user/.ssh/id_dsa': > Connection to host.xy closed b

Re: OpenBGPD regexp

* Anderson Nadal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-13 17:04]: > OpenBGPD suport regexp like Cisco or Quagga? > Example: if my router receive a full table from my peer, but i dont want > the full table, just some AS. Using Cisco/Quagga i create a route-map, > and a regexp like this "ip as-path access-lis

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

Just a shy question - if version 4 CDs have been shipped already, there *should* be a downloadable version laying around somewhere, shouldn't it ? -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Damian Wiest Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Oktober 2006 19:3

Re: best hardware plattform for openbsd

Claudio Jeker wrote: 500kpps sustained is a crazy amount of packets (especially think about possible peaks). Currently you can fine tune a OpenBSD box to do over 450kpps but there is not much headroom left for peaks. It is better to split the load on two routers that do 250kpps each. Additional

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

Nico Meijer schreef: Hi Joris, It's true this is hardly relevant for a discussion forum, but I hope you will all forgive me ... I just felt the need to voice my joy. Congrats! Please notify undeadly.org while you are at it. AFAIK it is good tradition to have the first "My cd set arri

Re: DHCP, CARP, and VLANs

On 10/12/06, Bryan Vyhmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This would send the DHCP requests to whatever server they needed to go > to. I have been trying to use dhcrelay on the firewalls for this purpose > with dismal results. If a DHCPREQUEST for comes in, all is well, > but if a DHCPDISCOVE

Fwd: Oldest Server you run

And I ment to send this to the whole list -- Forwarded message -- From: Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Oct 12, 2006 5:03 PM Subject: Re: Oldest Server you run To: Falk Husemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 10/12/06, Falk Husemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello List! We're

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:25:15AM -0400, Jeff Quast wrote: > On 10/13/06, Sideris Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:35:35PM +0200, Joris Van Herzele wrote: > >> It's true this is hardly relevant for a discussion forum, but I hope you > >> will all forgive me ... I ju

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

> >It appears, though I've not done more than take a quick glance, that > >this product can back up from NFS exports. If so, that might be the > >least hackish solution. > > Sorry to appear lazy, but do you remember where you saw that? IMHO > IBM's Tivoli documentation is all over the place, that'

Re: ospf and carp

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:08:07PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:57:57AM +0200, Ronnie Garcia wrote: > > stan a icrit : > > >On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:44:15AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > >>On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:40:57PM -0400, stan wrote: > In a carp(4)/pfsync(4)

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On 10/13/06, Michael Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 13, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Nico Meijer wrote: > Hi Joris, > >> It's true this is hardly relevant for a discussion forum, but I hope >> you will all forgive me ... I just felt the need to voice my joy. > > Congrats! Please notify undeadl

Re: ospf and carp

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:50:25AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2006/10/13 11:57, Ronnie Garcia wrote: > > "It is far better to just prefer the active router over the other. (This > > is actually what OpenOSPFD does (it announces the network only on the > > active router))" > > > > Which

Re: DHCP, CARP, and VLANs

I am about to pull my hair out. This just does not make sense. In searching the archives for anything that could be related I found a post that stated that running the vlan(4) with the correct netmask and the carp(4) interface with /32 caused dhcp to work fine for them. I have done that and it has

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

While I'm mildly terrified, if it actually works perhaps shit should be a port with a linux-lib dependency? There is a use for this if someone is up to building it. * ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-12 16:27]: > For the benefit of the archives: > > I also did > touch /emul/linux/etc/

Re: Kismet - Propably problems with ath0 (IBM brand)?

> dmesg Why? it`s no OpenBSD-Bug It`s Kismet wich is buggy. Because Kismet uses RADIOTAP even my card shouldn`t matter. But hell.. HERE IS THE DMESG (wich is absolutly NOT needed in this case I think): OpenBSD 4.0-current (GENERIC) #0: Mon Oct 9 18:44:29 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr

Re: Older BSD releases

Hi Ralph, All the older issues from 3.3 up to 3.9 are available on CD from the OpenBSD website, and all are in stock. Some previous versions are available on the mirrors, but not a continuous set from 3.3 to present. That said, you would find it a lot easier to just carefully save all your

armish fdisk/disklabel free sectors

installing OpenBSD/armish on an n2100 I had to manually fdisk as when I just used `fdisk -i' disklabel only saw 16383*1008-63 sectors free. I don't know if this is indicative of a problem or whether it's just information that might be useful to someone installing but either way it's in the list ar

Re: 421 error on ftp.openbsd.org

> > 421 There are too many connected users, please try later. > > Hi gang, we've had a machine failure here that's impacting > ftp.openbsd.org. We are working on correcting the problem. Please be > patient. Problem now fixed. sorry for the inconvenience everyone. -Bob -- #

Re: pfctl

Or you could do what I would do... Threaten to break his damn fingers...

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

On 13/10/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:11:16PM +0200, ropers wrote: > Hi, > Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish? > > I find myself having to use the Tivoli Storage Manager Backup/Archive > client (dsmc). > > As much as I would pr

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

> "Wim, where's my package!", Please refrain from Vandeputte-bashing... =;-) =;-) First, he is a very nice guy, second, we still need him, third, he is just moving (see http://www.kd85.com/) and certainly has enough trouble to put up with, anyway, and finally, OpenBSD distribution works fine al

Re: Kismet - Propably problems with ath0 (IBM brand)?

> Yes this is a problem with kismet (even the current svn snapshot). Maybe, it depends how you look at it. Ath(4) devices have problems (partly) because Kismet configures net80211 based capture sources to IFM_AUTO on OpenBSD. Only ath(4) has a problem with this, IFM_AUTO is the correct way to g

Re: DHCP, CARP, and VLANs

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 12:17:41PM +0200, ropers wrote: > This may be a red herring, but are you running pf(4) on these OpenBSD > firewalls? If so, are you letting DHCPDISCOVER messages through? I > made such a mistake some time ago: In my case there was a Windows DHCP > server on one side and its

Re: 421 error on ftp.openbsd.org

Hi gang, we've had a machine failure here that's impacting ftp.openbsd.org. We are working on correcting the problem. Please be patient. -Bob Beck * Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-13 02:31]: > Trying to download the latest patches, I have been getting this error for > the

Re: Kismet - Propably problems with ath0 (IBM brand)?

Hi, On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:00:09PM +0200, Andreas Maus wrote: > It was already mentioned a while ago: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=115548207902728&w=2 > > Due to the lack of a recent mailinglist (only a forum) I didn't report this > to the kismet developers. Unfortunat

Re: c.93.3 not found when installing packages

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:56:07AM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote: > On 10/13/06, Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Do I have to switch to using ports? Any other fix for the problem? > > A quick fix that worked for me (don't know if it's "bad" to do this or > not, though): > > # cd /usr/

Re: best hardware plattform for openbsd

Claudio Jeker wrote: 500kpps sustained is a crazy amount of packets (especially think about possible peaks). Currently you can fine tune a OpenBSD box to do over 450kpps but there is not much headroom left for peaks. [snip] On what hardware is that possible? Can you point to any guides or other

Re: Failover routers with OpenBGPD and independent BGP sessions

To me it seems that even having the IBGP session won't help the OP's particular issue (though he should have it anyway for other reasons)... as the peer session goes down, the routes from it go down with it, and IBGP withdraws those announcements. Nothing gets held over. Maybe establishing a second

Re: best hardware plattform for openbsd

Hello Rogier, On Fri, 13.10.2006 at 13:38:32 +0200, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/13/06, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >[...] whether I should stick with RAIDframe [...] or if I should go for > >hardware RAID instead [...] > > Personally, I find using hardware RAID

Cannot login into OpenSSH after applying patch 020_ssh2.patch to OpenBSD 3.8 stable

Hi everybody, I just patched OpenSSH on OpenBSD 3.8 and restarted OpenSSH. Now I can't login anymore using public/private key authentication. I get this on the client side: Enter passphrase for key '/Users/user/.ssh/id_dsa': Connection to host.xy closed by remote host. Connection to host.xy cl

Re: best hardware plattform for openbsd

Hi Claudio, first, I'd like to thank you for your comment. On Fri, 13.10.2006 at 16:00:55 +0200, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 500kpps sustained is a crazy amount of packets (especially think about > possible peaks). Currently you can fine tune a OpenBSD box to do over > 450kpps but

Re: c.93.3 not found when installing packages

Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to do a fresh install using a current snapshot (tried it with > the snapshot from yesterday and today) on i386. > > I get the report of a wrong libc available: [...] > As expected the libc is c.40.0 [...] > > I assume that because of the

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On 10/13/06, Sideris Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:35:35PM +0200, Joris Van Herzele wrote: > It's true this is hardly relevant for a discussion forum, but I hope you > will all forgive me ... I just felt the need to voice my joy. > > We all agree it's great softwar

Re: c.93.3 not found when installing packages

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Bernd Schoeller wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am trying to do a fresh install using a current snapshot (tried it with > the snapshot from yesterday and today) on i386. I am downloading from > 'mirror.switch.ch' and 'ftp.de.openbsd.org'. After install

Re: pfctl

Alexander Belikov a icrit : GC> Alexander Belikov a ecrit : Dear Community, I want to fix a problem on one of my servers. The problem is 2 admins 1 server :( Both of us have a root access to it. It was a will of our Top Managment.. Sometimes my 'partner' disables a part of pf rules to get a

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Sideris Michael wrote: SNIP > Probably I am missing something here, but, isn't the release date > 20061101? If so, why the early shipping? Just out of curiosity. > > -- > Sideris Michael I believe early shipment has always been the bonus for people who pre-order the CDs. If t

Re: ospf and carp

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:57:57AM +0200, Ronnie Garcia wrote: > stan a icrit : > >On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:44:15AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > >>On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:40:57PM -0400, stan wrote: > >>>Is it feasible to run ospf on a carp pair of firewalls? > >>>Is there any documntation as

Re: pfctl

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2006/10/13 14:36, fv wrote: > > > I want to add some code to pfctl which > > >would add all important rules to pf. In such way, if that rules > > >wouldn't be in pf.conf they would BE in pf. > > > > > I think it's a very bad idea. The best you can

Re: Getting custom code to execute on an invalid password

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 03:37:38PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello everyone. > > My question is simple: > > For each user on my system I have a list of passwords which they > should never, ever enter. If someone enters a password which is on > this list I know that their passwords have

Re: pf: 'block drop' used, but ICMP unreachables returned anyway...

On 10/13/06, Kian Mohageri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Check out the 3 articles on PF by Daniel Hartmeier (OpenBSD developer). I found them to be very clear and concise and I'm pretty sure his explanations will help you out. http://www.undeadly.org Thanks for the suggestion! One of these artic

Re: c.93.3 not found when installing packages

On 10/13/06, Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do I have to switch to using ports? Any other fix for the problem? A quick fix that worked for me (don't know if it's "bad" to do this or not, though): # cd /usr/lib # ln -s libc.so.40.0 libc.so.39.3 -Martin -- "Suburbia is where the

Re: pfctl

On Oct 13, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: Alexander Belikov a icrit : Dear Community, I want to fix a problem on one of my servers. The problem is 2 admins 1 server :( Both of us have a root access to it. It was a will of our Top Managment.. Sometimes my 'partner' disables a part of

Re: c.93.3 not found when installing packages

You can make a symbolic link : # ln -s /usr/lib/libc.so.39.2 /usr/lib/libc.so.39.3 That's I do to fix this probleme :) * Bernd Schoeller : > Hello everybody, > > I am trying to do a fresh install using a current snapshot (tried it with > the snapshot from yesterday and today) on i386. I am d

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On Oct 13, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Nico Meijer wrote: Hi Joris, It's true this is hardly relevant for a discussion forum, but I hope you will all forgive me ... I just felt the need to voice my joy. Congrats! Please notify undeadly.org while you are at it. AFAIK it is good tradition to have the f

Re: Swedish speakers -- OpenBSD and IBM Tivoli TSM BA

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:11:16PM +0200, ropers wrote: > Hi, > Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish? > > I find myself having to use the Tivoli Storage Manager Backup/Archive > client (dsmc). > > As much as I would prefer a free solution, this is the only offsite > backup s

OpenBGPD regexp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. OpenBGPD suport regexp like Cisco or Quagga? Example: if my router receive a full table from my peer, but i dont want the full table, just some AS. Using Cisco/Quagga i create a route-map, and a regexp like this "ip as-path access-list 1 permit

Re: layer-7 pf loadbalancing

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:13:42PM -0700, Alexander Lind wrote: > bumer. > anyone know of any alternatives that can run on openbsd? cd /usr/ports make search key=proxy Or was that not what you required? Some other search keys give other software that can perform the same function. A more specific

Re: best hardware plattform for openbsd

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:07:25PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to find systems that can be used _well_ with OpenBSD. The > applications are "middle class" BGP routers with hopefully more than > 500kpps sustained, and web and database servers. With RAID, I'm > currently unde

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

At 09:10 AM 10/13/06, Sideris Michael wrote: Probably I am missing something here, but, isn't the release date 20061101? If so, why the early shipping? Just out of curiosity. I think this means you've never pre-ordered. FTP sites have new versions on release dates. I'm quite sure cdrom are

Re: Kismet - Propably problems with ath0 (IBM brand)?

Hi Sebastian. On 10/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello everybody, [... snipp ...] Yes this is a problem with kismet (even the current svn snapshot). It was already mentioned a while ago: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=115548207902728&w=2 Due to the lac

Actual network chipset

Hi all, I wish to know actually which chipset this board has on, since the spec sheet says it has to be a RTL8110S-32 but after seeing the dmesg output I'm not so sure right now. This is from a 4.0-CURRENT from mid of September (14/09) re0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Realtek 8169" rev 0x10: irq

Re: Oldest Server you run

> mac68k testing: Quadra650 (not sure that qualifies > as production, even > though it runs at 100% CPU for days at a time when > doing a build). Also > hard to brag for slowness rights when it is almost > as fast as the > Quadras got. No, I don't have an SE/30... :) HmmmI guess it's time to

Re: pfctl

On 2006/10/13 14:36, fv wrote: > > I want to add some code to pfctl which > >would add all important rules to pf. In such way, if that rules > >wouldn't be in pf.conf they would BE in pf. > > > I think it's a very bad idea. The best you can do i think is to write > a pfctl wrapper script in order t

Re: High availability software for OpenBSD?

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:53:09PM -0400, Peter wrote: > I am looking for something comparable to Ultra Monkey (Linux) that runs > on OpenBSD. Anyone? Depends on what you want to do. ifstated(8), pfsync(4) and carp(4) can do quite a few useful things, but not everything. Then again, neither can U

Re: pfctl

GC> Alexander Belikov a ecrit : >> Dear Community, >> >> I want to fix a problem on one of my servers. The problem is 2 admins >> 1 server :( Both of us have a root access to it. It was a will of our >> Top Managment.. >> >> Sometimes my 'partner' disables a part of pf rules to get a better >> down

Re: pfctl

Alexander, On 13/10/2006, at 9:12 PM, Alexander Belikov wrote: I want to fix a problem on one of my servers. The problem is 2 admins 1 server :( Both of us have a root access to it. It was a will of our Top Managment.. This is not an OpenBSD issue. Management needs to appoint one of you to b

Re: pfctl

On 13/10/06, Alexander Belikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Community, I want to fix a problem on one of my servers. The problem is 2 admins 1 server :( Both of us have a root access to it. It was a will of our Top Managment.. Sometimes my 'partner' disables a part of pf rules to get a bette

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:35:35PM +0200, Joris Van Herzele wrote: > It's true this is hardly relevant for a discussion forum, but I hope you > will all forgive me ... I just felt the need to voice my joy. > > We all agree it's great software, but other than that just look at it : > The packagin

Re: UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

Hi Joris, > It's true this is hardly relevant for a discussion forum, but I hope > you will all forgive me ... I just felt the need to voice my joy. Congrats! Please notify undeadly.org while you are at it. AFAIK it is good tradition to have the first "My cd set arrived!" on [EMAIL PROTECTED] N

Re: pfctl

>> I want to add some code to pfctl which >> would add all important rules to pf. In such way, if that rules >> wouldn't be in pf.conf they would BE in pf. >> f> I think it's a very bad idea. The best you can do i think is to write f> a pfctl wrapper script in order to load your mandatory rules a

Re: pfctl

Alexander Belikov a icrit : Dear Community, I want to fix a problem on one of my servers. The problem is 2 admins 1 server :( Both of us have a root access to it. It was a will of our Top Managment.. Sometimes my 'partner' disables a part of pf rules to get a better download rate for himself. I

Re: pfctl

On 10/13/06, Alexander Belikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I want to fix a problem on one of my servers. The problem is 2 admins 1 server :( Both of us have a root access to it. It was a will of our Top Managment.. Social problems will never be wholly resolved by technical solutions. Speak to m

Re: pfctl

On 13/10/06, fv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to add some code to pfctl which > would add all important rules to pf. In such way, if that rules > wouldn't be in pf.conf they would BE in pf. > I think it's a very bad idea. The best you can do i think is to write a pfctl wrapper script in or

Re: Oldest Server you run

Original message >Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:08:21 -0400 >From: Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Oldest Server you run >To: misc > >Gordon Grieder wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:22:43PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote: >>> Bryan Irvine wrote: >>> > You win. >>> >>> I'

UPS just delivered the 4.0 release CD-set

It's true this is hardly relevant for a discussion forum, but I hope you will all forgive me ... I just felt the need to voice my joy. We all agree it's great software, but other than that just look at it : The packaging in itself is already enough to put me in a festive mood :) -- Joris Va

Re: pfctl

I want to add some code to pfctl which would add all important rules to pf. In such way, if that rules wouldn't be in pf.conf they would BE in pf. I think it's a very bad idea. The best you can do i think is to write a pfctl wrapper script in order to load your mandatory rules and rename it to

c.93.3 not found when installing packages

Hello everybody, I am trying to do a fresh install using a current snapshot (tried it with the snapshot from yesterday and today) on i386. I am downloading from 'mirror.switch.ch' and 'ftp.de.openbsd.org'. After installation, I try to install some packages that I need (from pub/OpenBSD/sn

  1   2   >