I don't, however, I don't claim to live by the same free vs non-free
rules, I use what works for me.
I think you have misinterpreted the principles that I believe in and
live by. I hope my explanations will help.
The free software foundation shall not be called free software
foundation.. it shall be called Stallmanist Foundation and the
philosophies are to be outlined as Stallmanism.. not free software.
If you want to campaign for a philosophical stand about software and
trees, you are
As for Intels use of non-ree software, I am sorry for them, and I hope
that someday they will be able to move to free software.
Yet you still support them, and require gNewsense users to use Intel/AMD
hardware?
I do not boycott companies for using non-free software.
In fact many of the people did expect this when you favorite
organization lost the battle publically on Reyk's code that your
friends stole and tried to impose your license on it, and when they
even tried vainly to go legal by the advice of a un-educated american
lawyer but
As for Intels use of non-free software, I am sorry for them, and I hope
that someday they will be able to move to free software.
Is this hope reasonable or logical?
Totally not. Intel just wants the best software they can afford to get
their
chips as fast and as good as
Hello all,
Can someone tell me what marketing speak to look for to determine if a
motherboard supports hw.setperf and apmd -C/A CPU speed regulation?
I have an unremarkable Intel D845GBV P4 board that supports hw.setperf fine but
a full-featured Intel SE7221BK1-E P4 server board that does not.
On Thu, January 3, 2008 07:58, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
... snip
With any kind of reasonable Internet access, rsync to another machine
is extremely easy to set up and maintain, and once the initial
duplication of all data is done the periodic (say once or twice a day)
transfer is almost not
Mr. Stallman, I respect you for what you've managed to achieve as an individual.
But, frankly, this thread has really gotten way out of control.
A few days back everything had kind-a settled down and we got the
impression that the thread had fortunately died, but that's not been
the case, you
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:19:38PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Nobody out here is going to listen to what you're going to say, and
you are going to go on and on about how you were justified in labeling
OpenBSD as not compliant with your interpretation of the word free,
which we don't give a
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Mr. Stallman, I respect you for what you've managed to achieve as an
individual.
But, frankly, this thread has really gotten way out of control.
A few days back everything had kind-a settled down and we got the
impression that the thread had fortunately died, but
On Jan 3, 2008 3:20 PM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact many of the people did expect this when you favorite
organization lost the battle publically on Reyk's code that your
friends stole and tried to impose your license on it, and when they
even tried vainly
Doug wrote:
2. I don't know the size of the disk to know the size of the backup
media required. However, CD/DVD burners are less than the cost
of a hard drive and the media is relatively cheap.
I personally don't recommend backups to CD/DVD.
They degenerate rather
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:03 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Real men don't attack straw men
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:19:38PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Nobody out here is going to listen to what you're going to say, and
you are going to go on
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:38:08AM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
He's not labelling OpenBSD non-free, just non-free-friendly because some
non-free are distributed in the ports site.
And yet, you still don't have it quite right. Saying that the ports system
On 1/3/08, Marius Hooge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug wrote:
2. I don't know the size of the disk to know the size of the backup
media required. However, CD/DVD burners are less than the cost
of a hard drive and the media is relatively cheap.
I personally don't recommend
Mayuresh Kathe schrieb:
Mr. Stallman,
...
Nobody out here is going to listen to what you're going to say, and
you are going to go on and on about how you were justified in labeling
OpenBSD as not compliant with your interpretation of the word free,
which we don't give a farthing for.
Hello Mayuresh,
a possible reason can be that he is thinking Some
of it might stick.
Not likely.
Go back under your rock, along with RMS and the rest
of the bunch.
--
Michael Schmidt MIRRORS:
Watcom
ftp://ftp.fh-koblenz.de/pub/CompilerTools/Watcom/
OpenOffice
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:53:26PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[blablabla]
Since I'm (at least) smart enough not to install proprietary software,
I don't have a strong problem with it, but for someone like RMS who
want's to be able to recommend strictly Free Software operating
A professional peer of mine wrote the following article:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23417
which contains the following paragraph:
Google's hired great open source developers from projects like
Linux, Firefox, Samba and Apache.
They all still have ties back into those
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:04:44AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:53:26PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Since I'm (at least) smart enough not to install proprietary software,
I don't have a strong problem with it, but for someone like RMS who
want's to be
The problem I am facing happens during installation of OpenBSD 4.2
-release, -stable, or -current as of January 1st (both amd64 and i386).
I can very easily reproduce this issue every time. I've been testing for
the last 48 hours, and can confirm that it never happens on 4.0 or 4.1.
Happens with
Stuart Henderson wrote:
It wouldn't be more likely that the disk _crashes_ by doing this,
and it may give _some_ protection against _some_ failure modes.
It also gives new and exciting ones to take their place.
Actually, since you'd be mirroring to two different portions of the
same disk
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:50:27PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:04:44AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:53:26PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Since I'm (at least) smart enough not to install proprietary software,
I don't
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:04:44AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:53:26PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Since I'm (at least) smart enough not to install proprietary software,
I don't have a strong problem with it, but for
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
There is a free copier of hardware: you, me, or anyone with a certian
amount of skill, and the required wires and other parts. This is how
the entire home PC business started, the whole homebrew market.
That's true for some kinds of
Why don't you tell us about emacs and gcc as Theo said?
If you don't want to answer nothing new here
Don't feed the troll!!
While reading this thread the course it has taken really surprises me.
I dont agree with Richards take on OpenBSD. I think OpenBSD is fine,
good for recommendations for a truly free OS. But what really surprises
me is that Stallman has resorted to blatant troll like posting just to
incite a
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:22:35AM -0700, L wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:04:44AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:53:26PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Since I'm (at least) smart enough not to install proprietary
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 10:53 AM
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Real men don't attack straw men
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:38:08AM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
He's not labelling OpenBSD non-free, just
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one at that as far as I can tell, to base your argument on.
The world will fall because OpenBSD recommends that people
install a game... a game that is free
On 2008/01/03 16:59, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
It wouldn't be more likely that the disk _crashes_ by doing this,
and it may give _some_ protection against _some_ failure modes.
It also gives new and exciting ones to take their place.
Actually, since you'd be
On Jan 3, 2008 10:28 PM, Ruben Gonzalez Arnau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you tell us about emacs and gcc as Theo said?
If you don't want to answer nothing new here
The wget he uses is worse.
You can download any non-free software with it and it does not warn
the user at all!!!
Referencing:
http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/services/crypto-services/crypto-algorithms-e.html
It is now 2008 and, per above link, the CSE de-lists certain HASH and
HMAC standards and algorithms, namely sha-1 is bumped to sha-224 (as a
minimum) including its downstream incorporations/reliances.
With
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 06:56:18PM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
The problem I am facing happens during installation of OpenBSD 4.2
-release, -stable, or -current as of January 1st (both amd64 and i386).
I can very easily reproduce this issue every time. I've been testing for
the last 48 hours,
nostromo:tobiasu$ for x in blahblah STFU. KTHXBYE; do banner $x; done
#
# # # #### # # ####
### ## # ## ## ## # ##
# # # ## ## # # ## ##
#
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:23:21PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Richard Stallman referred to certain URLs in certain Makefiles
in the ports tree---not the collection of packages, after (in
the interview which indirectly prompted this thread) confusing
OpenBSD's ports tree with its
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:13PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one at that as far as I can tell, to base your argument on.
The world will fall
L wrote:
GCC for ms WIndows does not even REQUIRE thinking first. Everyone
knows GCC is a great Windows Proprietary compiler to create
proprietary software.. it's just a cheaper compiler than MS VC. It
is so easy to get or make GCC on windows, because Stallman knows
his figurehead will
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
le that have an OpenBSD CD to install the OS have the chance to use
MORE free software than before.
That's got nothing to do with what was talked about. It's not about the
OpenBSD cd, but about having ...
http://www.openbsd.org/4.2_packages/i386.html
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 06:30:44PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:23:21PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Richard Stallman referred to certain URLs in certain Makefiles
in the ports tree---not the collection of packages, after (in
the interview which
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:13PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one at that as far as I can tell, to base your argument on.
The world will fall
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:48 PM
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Real men don't attack straw men
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one
Hi,
I've a question regarding the priority of routing entries.
Please take a look at the following routing table for a machine with 3
ethernet interfaces (
link#1 192.168.0.1 ( internal net 1 /24 )
link#2 u.v.w.254 ( internet/30 )
link#4 10.10.60.1 ( internal net 2 /24 ):
netstat
Watch your blood pressure there Stuart.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart VanZee[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3-1-08 20:23:52
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: FW: Real men don't attack straw men
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:48 PM
To:
Hello Nick,
That may be what you do, but you are generally wrong if that is your
goal.
The goal is that the BEST version of OpenBSD is -current.
This goal is usually met.
At home, I use -current version for 6 months.
However, I'm in my society, and I must set up 10 development machines,
and
This list is actually the first place I read of widespread use of GCC
for making proprietary software. Since so many lies are said about what
RMS promotes or not, I don't feel confident in taking your word for it
(specially since you seem to resort easily into insults).
This just underscores
I'm missing the bootloader interaction with OpenBSD 4.2 installed on a
compact flash card in this alix2c3. With the most recent bios from PC
Engines 0.99. If I strike any keys ( like boot -s) during the time when
the boot prompt should appear the system will not boot. If I wait it
boots fine.
On 1/3/08, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wget he uses is worse.
You can download any non-free software with it and it does not warn
the user at all!!!
And electricity! I'm pretty sure (unless I'm misinformed) he uses
electricity provided by plants and distribution systems that are
Marco Peereboom wrote:
bullshit.
I decided to put my money where my mouth is :)
I bought a 80GB, Western Digital IDE hard drive. $60 USD. Attached it to a
Windows XP laptop (usb-ide bridge), initialized it, created one (1) primary
partition, formatted it NTFS and copied an older subversion
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:02:40PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:19:38PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Nobody out here is going to listen to what you're going to say, and
you are going to go on and on about how you were justified in labeling
OpenBSD as not
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
If you are going to flame rms, it is best to keep him cc'd.
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:48 PM
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Real men
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:40:47AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:50:27PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:04:44AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:53:26PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Since I'm (at
I'm missing the bootloader interaction with OpenBSD 4.2 installed on a
compact flash card in this alix2c3. With the most recent bios from PC
Engines 0.99. If I strike any keys ( like boot -s) during the time when
the boot prompt should appear the system will not boot. If I wait it
boots
I am trying to get information about the SMDR port on the S8700. I am
attempting to run dual outputs from this IP system. Can you comment on
this or direct me to where I can obtain additional information?
Philip Colaluca- BT Americas CSNO Group-Unilever Account
office 203-402-4550,
On 2008/01/03 12:42, Bobby Johnson wrote:
I'm missing the bootloader interaction with OpenBSD 4.2 installed on a
compact flash card in this alix2c3. With the most recent bios from PC
Engines 0.99. If I strike any keys ( like boot -s) during the time when
the boot prompt should appear the
The serial console works correctly when the speed is set to 9600 bps.
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 12:42 -0700, Bobby Johnson wrote:
I'm missing the bootloader interaction with OpenBSD 4.2 installed on a
compact flash card in this alix2c3. With the most recent bios from PC
Engines 0.99. If I
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:55:16 -0800 (PST), new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
bullshit.
I decided to put my money where my mouth is :)
I bought a 80GB, Western Digital IDE hard drive. $60 USD. Attached it to
a
Windows XP laptop (usb-ide bridge), initialized it,
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:33:26PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC on mailing-list posts.
I consider it rude to receive duplicate email.
If you
I'm sorry Marco, but I think what you've said is bullshit, as well contacted
several so called data recovery organizations, after admitting to have
zeroed the drive contents - They said recovery wasn't possible..
While it might be possible to get miscellaneous data off of a drive, it would
WTF this has to do with being in misc@openbsd.org mailing lists?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I am trying to get information about the SMDR port on the S8700. I am
attempting to run dual outputs from this IP system. Can you comment on
this or direct me to where I can obtain additional
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:34:24PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
It would be nice if people would stop defending non defensible
hypocritical positions. His arguments are a misleading hyperbole.
Your attitude is also indefensible and ostentiously hypocritical, with a
rudeness that only adds
It can't be done. it's an urban legend, AFAICT.
Yes I know. That's the whole point of this. It would have been better
to donate a 100 bucks to OpenBSD. I'm just fed-up with the stupid
drivel about needing to burn, grind, overwrite, and nuke drives... and
even after all of that there's still a
On Jan 3, 2008 3:35 PM, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great. The companies I worked with charged $500 per megabyte. I am
sure you'll spend that to prove whatever point you are trying to make.
Free analysis. I pay shipping. The drive cost 60 bucks. I'll probably
have a total of 100
Re-adding RMS.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:34:24PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:13PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure
Rui Miguel Silva is continually making you guys remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the cc's of your messages.
FYI, I continually remove people from the CC on mailing-list posts.
Yet you have no idea whether these people are subscribed to these
mailing lists.
I consider it rude to receive
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Brad Tilley wrote:
SNIP
and nuking drives is *required*... it's silly and wasteful. One pass
from /dev/zero is more than enough for all cases.
HaHaHa, I wish my day job employer would let me take the drugs you're on.
diana
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 23:34]:
If neither hard drives nor CD/DVDs are a good backup soluton, and
networking the backup to another computer's hard drive (which then
presumably also has the bitrot problem) isn't an option, and a DLT or
whatever tape drive is too
On 2008/01/03 15:04, Jon wrote:
I understand the value and usefulness and the reccomendation of Ports.. This
is for my own software. I have also searched the net for examples and can't
find any.
You'd have to be doing something _very_ strange for there to be any
advantage in not just making
Good for google!
They hire themselves into fame and therefore look good in the process.
If the individual thinks that the money is worth it for him/her we have
a transaction. Nowhere do I see any ethical questions. Google is in it
for the money and someone needs to pay a mortgage. End of
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:00:19AM +0100, Kim Naim Lesmer wrote:
Hi.
This is just a small diff for cp.c I believe it will improve
readability a little bit.
Regards.
Sorry, the diff goes here:
--- cp.c2008-01-04 00:26:09.0 +0100
+++ cp_new.c2008-01-04
Marco S Hyman wrote:
Brad Tilley writes:
performed from the OpenBSD 4.2 install CD. I'll send it to the one
'ISO Certified' company that agreed to examine it. If they cannot
You keep throwing around the 'ISO Certified' tag as if it had some
special meaning. Certified to what
Myth? Why are you so upset about this? It's not myth.
The techniques involved in recovering data in the manner Marco and the NSA,
DoD, and many others describe isn't a matter of running a simple software
tool. It's a long, slow, annoying process that is also costly. But it is
possible. Not every
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:08:08PM -0800, Marco S Hyman wrote:
As for disk destruction... I don't know nor pretend to know what can
and can not be recovered. Take a look at
Ask yourself this question. Do you really believe that someone who
sells a product which was developed within the lawful frame work is
unethical?
You confusing the issue! The software market - where you sell your product
(i.e., software) is unethical,
distorted and manipulated, and not by
On Jan 3, 2008 5:21 PM, Harpalus a Como [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Myth?
Have you read this:
http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/overwritten-data-guttman.html?
Why are you so upset about this?
Myth's that compel people to waste time and energy should be destroyed.
It's not myth.
Have you read this
Marco Peereboom wrote:
This list is actually the first place I read of widespread use of GCC
for making proprietary software. Since so many lies are said about what
RMS promotes or not, I don't feel confident in taking your word for it
(specially since you seem to resort easily into insults).
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:34:24PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
It would be nice if people would stop defending non defensible
hypocritical positions. His arguments are a misleading hyperbole.
Your attitude is also indefensible and ostentiously
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:48:57PM +1100, Ioan Nemes wrote:
Ask yourself this question. Do you really believe that someone who
sells a product which was developed within the lawful frame work is
unethical?
You confusing the issue! The software market - where you sell your product
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:36:31PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 23:34]:
If neither hard drives nor CD/DVDs are a good backup soluton, and
networking the backup to another computer's hard drive (which then
presumably also has the bitrot
new_guy wrote:
I'm working on putting a website up now where I'll fully disclose the
details. Lots of pictures and details. I will attribute the dd used to
OpenBSD (the best OS on the planet bar none... although the dd on the
install CD did not support the conv option... I would have liked
On 3 Jan 2008 18:55:14 -0800, Unix Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I like the Put Up or Shut Up slogan as well!!)
The problem is that none of us have the funds that the NSA has to
aquire an answer that will actually silence this thread.
The reality is: Who are you trying to protect it against?
On 3-Jan-08, at 8:48 PM, Ioan Nemes wrote:
Ask yourself this question. Do you really believe that someone who
sells a product which was developed within the lawful frame work is
unethical?
You confusing the issue! The software market - where you sell your
product
(i.e., software) is
On Jan 3, 2008 8:47 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:36:31PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-03 23:34]:
If neither hard drives nor CD/DVDs are a good backup soluton, and
networking the backup to another
Hmmm Mr. Stallman is this your home page: stallman.org
I was a bit curious about what would someone who reads web-sites by
using a wget daemon through e-mails whose own web-site looks like...
well...
Apache httpd 2.0.54 ((Debian GNU/Linux) DAV/2 SVN/1.2.0 PHP/4.3.10-22
mod_ssl/2.0.54
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Mark Rolen wrote:
Diana Eichert wrote:
You can locate data from formatted and wiped hard drive, if you have the
resources behind you.
Can you point to an actual instance you know of where this has happened? I
don't mean that in an aggressive or challenging way, I'm
Eric Furman wrote:
It can't be done. it's an urban legend, AFAICT.
http://www.nber.org/sys-admin/overwritten-data-guttman.html
Which references Gutmann's paper which started all this...
Of course I'm sure a tax analyst (http://www.nber.org/vitae/vita184.htm)
knows more about data recovery
On Jan 4, 2008 9:48 AM, Ioan Nemes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You confusing the issue! The software market - where you sell your product
(i.e., software) is unethical,
distorted and manipulated, and not by the ethical software crafters!
Why is the software market unethical? Because there are
This is the same with your recommended system GNU/Darwin:
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/index.php?page=ports
Who also contains instructions to install the such port system.
Thank you for telling me about this problem. I will talk with them
about this ASAP. I expect they will probably
In addition, I thought that OpenSolaris was just a kernel, but it
looks like the question had in mind a whole system. This
miscommunication has the effect of making my statement appear to be an
endorsement of a system.
Huh? OpenSolaris is just a kernel
That's what I
On Jan 4, 2008 10:59 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, I thought that OpenSolaris was just a kernel, but it
looks like the question had in mind a whole system. This
miscommunication has the effect of making my statement appear to be an
endorsement
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra only ever contributes to this list when its in a
flame war, and always to take up a contrary point of view. He has proved
only one thing. Trolls do exist and their primary form of communication is
to point and grunt.
What Rui says is so stupid, its not even wrong.
Kindest
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:06:04AM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 19:15 +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Downgrades are NOT supported.
Some backrground info: the disklabel format changed from 4.1 to 4.2.
A 4.2 kernel makes sure to translate the format, and the new tools
Don't worry. You can ask rms if your behaviour is ethical. He'll set
you straight, and tell you to stop working for those companies and
instead suckle off your McArthur Idiot grant.
On Jan 4, 2008 9:48 AM, Ioan Nemes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You confusing the issue! The software market -
This is the same with your recommended system GNU/Darwin:
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/index.php?page=ports
Who also contains instructions to install the such port system.
Thank you for telling me about this problem. I will talk with them
about this ASAP. I expect they will
In addition, I thought that OpenSolaris was just a kernel, but it
looks like the question had in mind a whole system. This
miscommunication has the effect of making my statement appear to be an
endorsement of a system.
Huh? OpenSolaris is just a kernel
That's
On 1/3/08, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on putting a website up now where I'll fully disclose the
details. Lots of pictures and details. I will attribute the dd used to
OpenBSD (the best OS on the planet bar none... although the dd on the
install CD did not support the conv
On 1/3/08, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that there was a trend in the industry away from tapes toward
hard-drive-based systems, e.g. virtual tape libraries that are basically
large file servers with far more capacity than throughput. If bitrot is
a serious concern,
On 1/3/08, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/08, Marius Hooge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally don't recommend backups to CD/DVD.
They degenerate rather quickly depending on their quality and
the storage humidity.
Unlike a USB/Firewire harddisk inside your fire-, water-,
98 matches
Mail list logo
