I want to report a problem i experienced while testing OpenBSD 4.1 .
I've installed it, increased VM_PHYSSEG_MAX to 16
in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/include/vmparam.h to make
it work with this particular motherboard and made a
stable release.
Fluffy!!!
There be dragons..
The only downside to this that I can see is that occasionally somebody
naive and innocent sending backscatter (bounces of undeliverable spam)
would be tarpitted for a while.
I do not view such people as innocent - having your mail server
configured to do this is acting as a DOS
Nope. That's how it is supposed to work.
The point of authpf is for the user to say this IP
is me - if that IP could perhaps not be him, well, this
is not an application for authpf. I.E. if your users
are coming in from a NAT, you should rethink what you
are doing.
-Bob
I fully understand your reasoning. Under normal circumstances users
authenticate from their desktop machines (which is a unique IP) and
therefore not a problem. However, sometimes they are VNC'd into servers
(more CPU power) and want to access resources behind the internal
'firewall'.
And guess what. Keyboards use a serial protocol. Which means that
there will be slightly different voltage drops in the system varying
with the keys you press. ZOMG! OpenBSD provides a side channel for
attackers through the sensors framework!
And don't forget the aps(4) sensor on
3) Use info garnered through survey to
a) craft appeals on website
Don't need a survey for this. we have a pretty good idea what biggies
are using it.
b) create email appeals to self-identified users in correct
classes.
Oh, a directed spam
Or maybe we need 20 more people like Jason Dixon, to make an appeal to a
company where they have contacts, where the message will at least be
read. That's directly targetted, and therefore more meaningful, and I
think has a higher chance of success.
Anyone out there know companies using and
* Satadru Pramanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-13 16:00]:
I have OpenBSD 4.0 setup with spamd doing greylisting for a mail
server, and I am having a problem with more and more companies sending
mail that is getting stuck in spamd from having a pool of mail servers
sending mail from several
* Praveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-12 05:14]:
Hi,
From the man page it appears that spamd relies on
static information about spam originators.
Why not a more dynamic scheme ?.
No, it doesn't. please read the man page instead of
trolling.
Why not run the content of the mail
I still don't see how hosts in spamd-white are not sent to spamd.
what if a host is in spamd-white, but not in spamd-exempt..
-Bob
* Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-11 17:21]:
On 2007/06/08 16:02, Bob Beck wrote:
rdr-anchor hoststated/smtp from spamd-white
rdr
read the archives for the answer to this and other fascinating
questions.
or look very carefully at the contents of that directory.
* Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-09 04:53]:
I've noticed that original greyscanner by beck@ doesn't work with latest
spamd.
Is there
* Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-10 10:24]:
--- Jeff Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thank you.
Can I assume that all connected/disconnected messages I see in
/var/log/daemon
are
from blacklisted hosts or some are still greylisted (undefined)?
Either
rdr-anchor hoststated/smtp from spamd-white
rdr proto tcp from !spamd-exempt to $MX port smtp - 127.0.0.1 port spamd
The fact that those two table names are different looks suspiciously
wrong to me.
-Bob
Many things. according to the logs you have there it didn't
even talk smtp to you, so it shouldn't pass.
* Edgars Mak??a [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-04 12:07]:
Hi!
I have some problems with spamd. A lot of smtp servers stops at this
point of cycle:
Jun 4 20:40:17 firewall
* Miod Vallat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-31 23:05]:
Good! You only have to buy a boat then, since you've already got the
boat anchor!
Miod
This from the man with an mcd(4) hooked up to an isa bus on his
hp300 That's kinda like a guy with a pierced nipple being
called a freak
yes, but not in response to the DATA command (what I was talking about)
but after.
no, you're wrong. right from rfc 2821:
8
DATA
I: 354 - data - S: 250
E: 552, 554, 451, 452
E: 451, 554, 503
8
explicitly - if I decide something is wrong
Things are better with an ebay'd ami(4) (PERC3/SC, PERC3/DC, etc) which
shouldn't be too expensive or hard to find, are supported by GENERIC,
and work with bioctl/sensorsd.
Yes, if you can get an ami based perc, they rock.
-Bob
I just used dnsstuff to test one of my domain names and it showed me
(the first time only) that my server is an openrelay, which is obviously
not true. This is due to the default behaviour of spamd of accepting
everything, even when a spamd.alloweddomains file is present. I think
this could
Trust me - bit the bullet and change to 587/465 anyway.
we had to for road warriors because 25 is blocked in so many
places anyway from walkups. You're better just getting your
users to switch.
* Chad M Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-22 12:46]:
Since having users change
just deduced from trial and error. Also greylisting should happen at
RCPT TO, and probably not at DATA as there are some widely used MTAs
that are buggy and choke when a 4xx error is sent in the DATA phase.
I've been running this at DATA for months, and not seen any
issues with it.
arlo guthrie
...
We walked in, sat down, Obie brought up the the help desk page with
the twenty seven 800 x 600 colour glossy screenshots with circles and
arrows and a paragraph below each one explaining what each one was to
be used to show Windows users what to do. Luser came in and
I manage about 30 mail servers, all using greylisting for years (not
OpenBSD spamd, but a version running in the MTA). But as I greylist at
RCPT TO, I only noticed the problem it when clamav did go down and the
server was producing a 4xx error at DATA when it should have scanned the
mail.
Makes me think some sort of OS has to be present before using cu. I have a
couple of sparc machines with no monitor/OS that I would love to throw an
OS
on..
Zach
sure you can, but the hardware boot ROM has to support it. I ran most of
my non-intel systems headless for years. If
The example in the man page assumes your mail server requires no
redirection.
If you actually redirect connections to your real mail server, then
you will need to modify the example appropriately.
-Bob
* Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-03 19:02]:
I've just
* Matthias Bertschy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 11:26]:
I think this would only make sense if authpf could stand multiple
connections from same host...
Unfortunately, it is not possible:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08318.html
So, I still wonder why such a feature
,
Antoine Jacoutot, Artur Grabowski, Ben Lindstrom, Bernd Ahlers,
Bjorn Sandell, Bob Beck, Brad Smith, Brandon Creighton,
Brian Caswell, Brian Somers, Bruno Rohee, Camiel Dobbelaar,
Can Erkin Acar, Cedric Berger, Chad Loder, Chris Cappuccio,
Chris Kuethe, Christian Weisgerber
Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind
spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0
-Bob
* Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 08:29]:
I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from puremagic
and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another
Bullshit. just use NFS :)
-Bob
* Steven Harms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-19 17:01]:
This isn't an OpenBSD specific solution, but you should be able to use an
EMC san to accomplish this (we use a fiber channel setup)
On 4/19/07, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
features?
I'm actually running a February snapshot (early 4.1 beta) if that makes a
difference; this is considered living on the edge for me.
At 12:59 PM 4/20/07, Bob Beck wrote:
Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind
spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0
We have settled on
what software to use for everything but the mail server.
I'm reasonably happy using the Courier-MTA suite on OpenBSD. It's had
four reported vulnerabilities
(http://secunia.com/product/2557/?task=advisories), three DOS and one
remote-code-execution in a corner case
You are going about this all wrong. First step is finding a suitable
blunt instrument and getting the developers to fix it. The second step
is configuring rate limiting, along the lines of '1000 mails/hour';
this will allow a large batch of e-mail to get through immediately, but
stop
* Paolo Supino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-14 08:43]:
Hi Kyle
1. Fixing the code is impossible :-( I already tried it, the developers
keep saying that they're code is sound and safe. I've shown logs and
statistics to the bosses of the company that owns the webapp, but the
only response I
* Paolo Supino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-12 22:12]:
Hi
I have the following problem: I host a group of windows servers that
run a webapp using IIS6 ASP technology. The webapp was written and is
maintained by a small private company that develops custom webapps for
companies. One of
* Rafael Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-23 14:52]:
I'm aware that OpenBSD's developers create new technology for making
the exploiter's life harder. On the OpenBSD site I could find a list
of some of those kinda features (following this paragraph). Yet, I
could not find any article
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201
Just for some entertainment, no troll :-)
--Siju
IMHO it's not a fair comparison, most linux distributions ship with alot
more software than microsoft windows does, and most bugreports indicate
an
* Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-22 10:32]:
Kamil Monticolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# ls -lhS /usr/lib/libcrypto*a
-r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.7M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto_pic.a
-r--r--r-- 1 root bin 11.6M Mar 22 13:53 /usr/lib/libcrypto_p.a
-r--r--r-- 1 root
Although this seems like a great printer, my biggest limitation is price. We
have a university property disposition near me, which I'm going to go check
out
later today. My friend has gotten a couple sun sparc stations from them for
under $20 bucks. I'm hoping they will have some cheap
* Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-21 11:30]:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:27:40AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
LexMark C510 laser. Color, ethernet, postscript. $325 CDN 6 months ago
just works.
I've had nothing but pain and aggravation with bullshit inkjets.
Was that new
* James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-21 00:11]:
I'm looking to finally cut the last strand that keeps windows on my hard
drive. I currently have a brother mfc-210c printer. I'm looking to replace
it with a cheap openbsd/lpr friendly solution. Although the mfc is a
multifunction
I have a T30. pretty much everything works on it and very
well, it suspends and resumes again.
It would be a good choice for a used laptop.
-Bob
* Igor Sobrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-20 03:19]:
Hello.
I am looking for a laptop to replace my old, but excellent,
* Bray Mailloux [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-20 13:33]:
Have a patch been issued?
Yes. see the errata page
It might just be the time servers, but date is
reporting 11:04:31 when it is 12:05.
It aint the time servers they report in UCT.
Your timezone is wrong
* Sid Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 03:25]:
Regardless, if NOOP is in the SMTP standard, and spamd does not handle
it correctly, that is a bug that needs to be fixed.
Bullshit. that's not a good enough reason - spamd does not
implement all of smtp, and never will. saying it's
* Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-17 13:45]:
Hi,
The latest entry in
http://www.vuxml.org/openbsd/
is
2006-01-10clamav -- heap overflow in the UPX code
more than a year now?
Certainly looks that way.
is there any other place to get updated RSS feed for the
* Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-17 08:39]:
I don't know what's worse, the junky posts from people who come out of the
woodwork around release dates or the
Two chick f/cking in wild orgy \
Normalize your Cholesterol \
mature blonde milf f/cking hardcore s/cking \
Time is running
* Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 20:50]:
I don't live in US Canada nor Europe... but I am worried if I ordered
From North America to anywhere worldwide, would the CD have the lack
of built-in cryptography due to the US Export laws?
Hate to tell you this, but Canada is not the
* Bryan Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-17 16:22]:
On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
Hate to tell you this, but Canada is not the United States.
Give us a couple years. Pax Americana, yo.
Nah, at the rate it's going in a couple years your deficit and dollar
won't
* Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 12:20]:
Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
his copyrighted Puffy logo?
http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
Hunh? a No Blob poster with FreeBSD on it? that's a
fucking joke. they're the
Your problem is that you are running the greytrapper script
for 4.0 on 4.1 - the spamdb database has changed - there is a
new field in the spamdb output.
you should not run that old greytrapper script on 4.1 spamd.
-Bob
* Jeff Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-14 09:55]:
Guess this is a MailEnable bug, but maybe anyone has the possibility to test
if this patch helps to workaround the problem.
This is completely a mailenable bug and should be reported to them.
They are assuming that the sending mta can always send the numeric code as one
byte. in fact,
* Johan P. Lindstrvm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-08 05:25]:
The Stanford SRP Authentication Project
The Secure Remote Password protocol is the core technology behind the
Stanford SRP Authentication Project. The Project is an Open Source
initiative that integrates secure password
# cat /etc/authpf/users/cyoub/authpf.rules
external_if = bge0
internal_if = bge1
pass in quick on $external_if from $user_ip to 172.16.0.0/22
pass in quick on $external_if from $user_ip to 172.16.4.0/22
pass in quick on $external_if from $user_ip to 172.16.8.0/22 -- I add this
after I
* Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-08 19:39]:
I'm currently going in to test some new stuff that
will fix this problem. so as theo said. wait a few days..
damn... you guys rock!
Will it be something in the lines of pfsync?
Yes. go read undeadly.
-Bob
* Paul Pruett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-05 07:04]:
Okay, sorry to pester list,
but I jumped and fell short on an active mail machine, about 6 hours ago.
I knew doing this on a cyrus-imapd server was insane
I Upgraded from i386 openbsd 4.0 to amd64 openbsd 4.0
So if someone
* Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 19:27]:
I found it highly amusing that as a result of runnig the latest spamd
in greylisting mode with this change
Make spamd include the HELO/EHLO identification string sent by
the connecting hosts in the tuple key when greylisting. catches
* Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-28 12:59]:
I wonder how people are coping with master downtime when using spamd?
Is it a good idea to regularly dump spamd-white into a file, rsync it
to the backup carp server, and load these IPs in a separate table?
I was thinking of lowering
* RJ45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 02:40]:
actually i just need ssh kerberos authentication
but the problem is that using ssh kerberos authentication I got an error
upon autghentication
Feb 26 21:42:54 bastionbox1 krb5: verify: Server not found in Kerberos
database
Feb 26 21:42:54
It was just targeted at THIS particular issue and the future ideas to
continue making OpenBSD (development) better/more fun.
And by detracting from the important issue which is:
* We need gear in europe for f2k7 *
You manage to sidetrack something important with your hack.
So in
* Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 15:09]:
Greetings...
By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white?
Yes.
spamd(8) says:
spamd regularly scans the /var/db/spamd database and configures all
whitelist addresses as the spamd-white pf(4)
* Tang Tse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-24 04:38]:
Hi,
Thanks for your answear. So best i use linux for a printer server?
No, I've used the CUPS/ghostscript mashups to attempt
to make hundred dollar inkjets work on linux. similarly handbuilt
them on openbsd. neither with any reliable
I was thinking the exact same thing.
A number of our customers use the ability to customize their SMTP
banner via our products in order to avoid some very basic system
identification by spammers (Cisco PIX does this too for instance, but
in a very broken and disruptive way). It
i have seen a number of spammer outfits doing this: following the RFC
and retrying until the spam gets though and they're whitelisted, then
they're free to push crap through. any thoughts on how to best combat
this behavior besides spamassassin + amavisd (i.e. wasting cpu cycles
and
* smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-01 17:15]:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:38:37 -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote
May be if there was a way to distribute one own addition only may be
a good idea as then we could merge traplist from multiple locations
if one wants to do this. I wouldn't have any
it is created automatically by spamd when you run it in greylisting
mode
-Bob
* Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-02 10:34]:
How can /var/db/spamd be created? I went through spamd.conf(5), pfctl(8),
spamd-setup(8), spamdb(8), spamlogd(8) etc. and did not see it
And the other thing people forget who try to helpfully set
us up a 501(c) in the US is that most of our expenses are *NOT* in the
united states. and a 501(c) has to spend most of it's money in the
united states. This is not helpful to us.
A Canadian solution is in the works.
* Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-29 09:49]:
Hi OpenBSD'lers,
I'm about to use OpenBSD's pf(4) for load balancing some webservers. So
far, everything is looking just perfect.
Compared to pound, pf(4) is incredibly fast with few CPU and memory usage.
So I'd say: Thats great :)
* Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-29 11:49]:
On Jan 29, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Bob Beck wrote:
a 501(c) has to spend most of it's money in the
united states. This is not helpful to us.
A Canadian solution is in the works.
Hmm, that must be a 501(a) :-)
you mean 501
Yes, theo is still hiking, although I'm quite surprised
that the usual pack of idiots on misc@ can't contribut adequatly to
comic relief - in my experience they are usually much funnier than
theo.
-Bob
* Allie Daneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-26 22:59]:
Is Theo still hiking,
1) I don't have enough information to tell what you are asking. show the
real logs.
2) greyscanner is not part of openbsd - it is a proof of concept piece
written by me, so you should probably ask me directly (with full logs)
rather than asking the list.
-Bob
* Ramdas [EMAIL
Sounds to me like your pf rules and/or bridge setup
are not set up correctly to allow the connections to be redirected.
-Bob
* Stephen Schaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-08 18:52]:
tail -f /var/log/daemon shows:
Jan 8 02:23:38 spamd spamd[4966]: listening for incoming
is there any way to work around users like this besides not whitelisting
outbound mail? a spamlogd blacklist of users that do not have the
outbound mail IPs whitelisted is a thought, but maybe not the right idea.
Actually, come to think of it, if I could get away with it, I'd
* Stas Myasnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-06 11:57]:
Hello,
is it safe to use group 'users' from /etc/group as the login group for
the users? Or it is reserved for some system use?
While I actually believe it is safe on OpenBSD, I never give users
groups from the system groups
[private email from bob saying you've screwed up, show me this]
[public reply spewing output to list.]
Obviously you still have a configuration problem, but if I contact
you in a private email to sort out your problem because I am willing
to help you, and you then start spewing the
* Miguel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-30 16:41]:
Hi, how can i check the servers' health and delete a server from the
pool when it loses connection with the load balancer, is such thing
posible?
thanks
http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/scripts/sslchecker
is set up for checking an ssl
* Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-28 14:03]:
Hi OpenBSD developers,
Which are your preferred tools for develop? (For C, C++, Java,
etcno matter the language)
Visual C++, .NET, and C sharp of course. Theo mandates
taht we all to use only the 7337est
spamd(8) says the default is 800, which is actually a compiled-in
limit and is quite generous for most situations. The consequences of
raising it are not immediately obvious, but I imagine could be
entertaining.
because if you go much beyond it you need to consider things like
All webmail products suck. I am using horde in one location
and squirrelmail in another.
-Bob
* Jasper Bal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-23 07:48]:
Anyone using webmail on OpenBSD? What's good, what's not?
Jasper
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
if ((not 0 not 1) != (! 0 ! 1)) {
this means that access to ftp. and www. will suck. we're busy trying
to fix. thank you for your patience.
-Bob
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
if ((not 0 not 1) != (! 0 ! 1)) {
print Larry and Tom must smoke some really primo stuff...\n;
}
Hi Daniel, I don't do this in spamd at the moment, because I want to
keep spamd small and secure, and regex code is amazingly big and scary.
have a look at my prototype greylist scanner from my nycbug
talk for a way to do this.
-Bob
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, not yet. see http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/
* edgarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-07 01:54]:
Hi misc!
Is it possible to keep in sync two or more spamdb over the network? :)
Thanks.
Edgars.
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
if ((not 0 not 1) != (! 0 ! 1)) {
print Larry
* Jason McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-07 11:25]:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 06:52:19PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Can I suggest adding atalk(4), inet6(4), ipsec(4), pf(4), pflog(4),
eon(5), hostapd(8), and tcpdump(8) to the SEE ALSO section of
ifconfig(8)? I think that, as these
* Michael Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-02 18:33]:
All,
Wrap your bloody lines!
Here's a question that I wanted to pose to the OpenBSD community about
managing and maintaining a large number of OpenBSD systems in the field. To
provide some background, we currently have
I'm trying to configure 3.9 to authenticate against a Kerberos 5
realm. Kerberos is correctly configured (I can get a ticket via
kinit). I've created a new user class and assigned krb5-or-pwd
authentication (relevant portion of login.conf is below). I assigned
a user to the class and
that is of the form
host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] How your campus
kerberos admins choose to do this I wouldn't know, sorry, you'll have
to break down and ask them.
-Bob
* Donald J. Ankney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-24 14:27]:
On Oct 24, 2006, at 12:29 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
Did you give the wee
I am 99% sure that I have seen on the internet SOMEWHERE a whitelist
of servers that are like this. I thought Bob Beck had forwarded one at
one point in time, but I can only find his post regarding the tarfile he
maintains for the zombie hosts.
Bob, if you are listening, what do you do
My typical way to do his is find my latest dump(s) on tape
or elsewhere - chuck them on an nfs server accesible to the machine
to be restored, boot from bsd.rd, mount the nfs location with the
dump files and proceed.
-Bob
* Michal Soltys [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-19 09:19]:
So
Theo president ! :)
What an interesting idea. I would vote for him...
I wouldn't, and I count him as a friend. The president is a puppet
whore of special interest groups and shitheads, made to manipulate to
the lowest common denominator so the USA gets the government it
Should the man page be updated, or am I doing something wrong?
Both. Know what shell you are running and know if it eats and
in a string. Having said that it's nicer if the man page makes you not have
to think. I've changed it to single quotes in the example.
-Bob
Hi gang, we've had a machine failure here that's impacting
ftp.openbsd.org. We are working on correcting the problem. Please be
patient.
-Bob Beck
* Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-13 02:31]:
Trying to download the latest patches, I have been getting this error
421 There are too many connected users, please try later.
Hi gang, we've had a machine failure here that's impacting
ftp.openbsd.org. We are working on correcting the problem. Please be
patient.
Problem now fixed. sorry for the inconvenience everyone.
-Bob
--
While I'm mildly terrified, if it actually works perhaps shit
should be a port with a linux-lib dependency? There is a use for
this if someone is up to building it.
* ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-12 16:27]:
For the benefit of the archives:
I also did
touch /emul/linux/etc/mtab
It appears, though I've not done more than take a quick glance, that
this product can back up from NFS exports. If so, that might be the
least hackish solution.
Sorry to appear lazy, but do you remember where you saw that? IMHO
IBM's Tivoli documentation is all over the place, that's why I
We, the authors of this work, are giving it away to you, dear
reader (and to everyone else), as an opportunity, not as a
service. Do with it whatever you want. We welcome your
contributions, and we owe you nothing.
This fails to grant the rights explicitly identified
Hi.
I happen to also run Tivoli/TSM.
As far as I know there is no native OpenBSD Tivoli client. and for
disaster recovery purposes (if that's all you are using it for) you
don't really need one - the tivoli client does object by object (read
that - file by file) backup
* Tobias Weisserth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-09 16:39]:
AIDE keeps reporting a change in the SHA1 checksum of /etc/motd. Even
...
I did a thorough check of the system and didn't notice any funny
Well, you may not have noticed anything funny, but what
you're seeing is normal.
How so? They've both been clear about what they want and what they
stand
for.
Every book is new until one has read it. It's interesting to see the
different take
these two crusaders have on the firmware.
How so? that RMS is ranting about another undoable unmaintainable
if they want to fix third world countries they should start with the
governments, this seems more like a marketing excercise
Unfortunately, fixing the government while maintaining the universal
democracy that is practically insisted upon by the USA as world
uber-cop makes that a very
Thoroughly enjoyed the bonus track.
Ty's ramblings reminded me of Ruby Rhod's in Luc Besson's The Fifth Element.
Ty as Ruby.. OMG, you just made me lose my coffee. can't wait to
tell him that one although theo will beat me to it :)
-Bob
* Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-05 14:56]:
It sure seems that OpenBSD and a few others with the FSF are
the last bastions of freedom. I guess no one else understands how it
serves their interests to demand openness. Was it always this way or
have we somehow lost the picture?
In a private reply to my initial mail Jim Gettys (OLPC / Red Hat) said:
Free and open software is a means to an end, rather than the
sole end unto itself for OLPC.
I was totally stunned by this admission. morally bankrupt, as Bob
says, is exactly what is going on.
I
* Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-05 16:03]:
Free and open software is a means to an end, rather than the
sole end unto itself for OLPC.
I was totally stunned by this admission. morally bankrupt, as Bob
says, is exactly what is going on.
Hmm, sounds like you are
201 - 300 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
