Has any one configured Zope with Apache with chroot?
I'm using OpenBSD 3.7. I already have Apache configured with -DSSL and
created the certificates and keys. I can research how to configure Zope to use
Apache but I would appreciate any advice on configuring it with Apache set with
chroot. I
Do away with akpop3d altogether. Use OpenBSD's sendmail and popa3d.
Install OpenVPN on your OpenBSD server and client computer to connect to
OpenBSD's default MTA and POP3 server. This is a much easier and vastly
more flexible solution. I use it all the time and only require's me to
Is there any unix utility or script or OpenBSD port that will find
duplicate binary files within a directory?
Easiest solution:
Setup a ftp server or sftp/scp/ssh server with OpenBSD on a separate IP
Address from your firewall/gateway. I once setup a ftp server out in
the open like that with OpenBSD. I ran no firewalls. I never had any
problems. If you do this and say if it does get hacked,
It would be nice if sftp/scp/ssh could be chrooted. But I'm sure you
can always mess with the rights for each user though.
As for warns of k1dd13s, why care? If you open a port, someone will
find you. If you're concerned about the kiddies using up your
bandwidth, have pf running on the
Can anyone tell me how to install gforth on OpenBSD 3.8. I tried
./configure, make, make check at this is some of what I got:
cd engine make gforth gforth-ditc gforth-fast gforth-itc
`gforth' is up to date.
`gforth-ditc' is up to date.
`gforth-fast' is up to date.
`gforth-itc' is up to date.
I'd be more scared of the hacker that can bypass wep,
than the average joe without wep.
The hacker knows how to exploit your wep-decrypted network traffic,
the average joe doesn't even if it were plain-text data.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:41:35 -0500, mail-lists wrote
Why bother adding WPA when you can turn many wlan cards into AP-mode and
have an OpenBSD box serve wireless computers with IPsec capabilities.
You then have an AP with many more capabilities than any
linksys/netgear/whatever AP.
This
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:12:35 +0200 (CEST), Siegbert Marschall wrote
Well,
I'd be more scared of the hacker that can bypass wep,
than the average joe without wep.
The hacker knows how to exploit your wep-decrypted network traffic,
the average joe doesn't even if it were plain-text
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:45:44 -0500, mail-lists wrote
Openvpn
Unless I'm mistaken Openvpn is not equal to Ipsec
good enough to accomplish the job securely. Better than ipsec if you have no
control of the network you are on, i.e. you are a mobile user who happens to
be on a wireless
Are there any plans for an OpenBSD implementation of sshfs?
Or has someone successfully installed fuse and sshfs on OpenBSD
(preferably 3.8)?
I would even consider doing away with dns and point everyone to the isp
dns along with using static ip addresses. You only need dns if you
anticipate a lot of users making dns queries to the point of affecting
your bandwidth or you need a dns server to point the rest of the
internet to your
I bought a new 1U server with an Intel SE7221BK-1E Entry Server Board, a
LSI MegaRAID Sata 150-4D SER523 REV B2 card, and two Seagate Barracuda
400 GBytes hard drives.
Problem:
When I install OpenBSD 3.8, and I get to the part that says:
Proceed with install? [no]
I type y and I get:
No
David Hill wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:44:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/04/04 20:21, David Hill wrote:
Are you using floppyB, which supports RAID controllers?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#MkInsMedia
OpenBSD 3.8 (RAMDISK_CD) #794: Sat Sep 10 15:58:32
Marco Peereboom wrote:
No it does not. It specifies very clearly which ones are supported.
I bet you are looking at the FAQ as-of 3.9.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:17:44AM -0700, Smith wrote:
David Hill wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:44:22AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote
Stuart Henderson wrote:
I called the vendor who created the server and they suggested that I
move the LSI card from the pci-express slot to the regular pci slot.
How the $DEITY are you going to do that - with a hacksaw?
Or do you mean PCI-X...
The card will fit both slots. Since
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Have you tried 3.9 yet?
Smith wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
No it does not. It specifies very clearly which ones are supported.
I bet you are looking at the FAQ as-of 3.9.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:17:44AM -0700, Smith wrote:
David Hill wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:01:49PM -0401, Ray Lai wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:26:37PM +, Tan Dang wrote:
Any reason why www.openbsd.org displays Japanese by default now?
woot! maybe it's there so you get into the habit of using
mirrors
Ah. Add server.skyblue.mine.nu to the file /etc/mail/local-hosts-names
On 2006/05/16 01:15, SkyBlueshoes wrote:
I've just installed OpenBSD 3.8...my first ever *nix. I've got most up
and running, but I'm having problems recieving email. I followed the
guidelines on this page
Also, server.skyblue.mine.nu should be an A record.
Smith wrote:
Ah. Add server.skyblue.mine.nu to the file /etc/mail/local-hosts-names
On 2006/05/16 01:15, SkyBlueshoes wrote:
I've just installed OpenBSD 3.8...my first ever *nix. I've got most up
and running, but I'm having problems
This has been asked before, and I tried many of the suggestions given
especially with pf (max-src-conn). But the simplest way to stop this,
is to change your ssh port. You can do all that tweaking in pf but your
logs will still show that someone tried, just that your logs will be
smaller.
I once posted that all the anti-virus checking should be done on the
Windows boxes only. Let the mail server deliver mail, let the firewall
block bad packets, and let Windows find the viruses. Why? Re-read what
Chad stated in the last sentence below. Some people replied that that
was
Sorry, a little more detail. Pf is not running on any of these ftpd
servers.
My ftpd setup consist mainly of:
/etc/rc.conf.local = ftpd_flags=-DllUSAn
/etc/ftpusers = has the admin account in there
/etc/ftpchroot = the account that will receive the scans
/etc/shells = /usr/bin/false
the
This will answer two post:
It does work in 3.8 still. As a matter a fact, I have two servers on
the intranet. The 3.8 works fine but not the 3.9.
I tried the passive/active and still the problem persist.
If I use the command line or filezilla (another windows ftp client
that's open
I tried in /etc/rc.conf.local
ftpd_flags=-DllUSAn4
and rebooted. Problem still persisted. I checked netstat -an to verify
that it was not listening on tcp6 port 21.
I'm going to do Nick Holland's suggestion and the tcpdump idea too.
how do I compile it. I know I can look at previous patches and possible
figure it out but I wouldn't know if it's the proper way to do it. I
have a test machine all setup and ready and my pwd is
/usr/src/libexec/ftpd.
Okay, I followed Nick Holland's suggestion.
First, I had setup an OpenBSD 3.9 test machine. The only configuration
I did was to setup the ftpd service as described in a previous post. I
tested it, the problem still persisted. Then I download src.tar.gz from
the 3.8 directory on a mirror
Peter if you want to be anonymous look up tor.
I'm not trying to call you names or anything and I'm no security expert either
but I'm sure this scenario is likely from the point of view of your ISP:
If I'm going to provide my customers internet access I better keep track of
the traffic that my
There are no useful answers for idiots.
I like that phrase, I'll have to remember that one.
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:22:13 -0500, Eric Johnson wrote
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Eric Johnson
Someone posted a question about a week or two ago for a chrooted web-based
email system. Nick Holland (I think) wrote
A little trick I do is this:
1. go to ftp.someopenbsdmirror.com/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386 and get the
index.txt file.
2. create another file called 1 without the quotes with the following:
pkg_add -v ftp://ftp.someopenbsdmirror.com/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/\
3. Whenever you want to
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:41:07 +0100, Pedro Timsteo wrote
Speaking of ksh, is there any way to configure it to clear the
screen with CTRL+L, as bash does?
Thanks.
clearenter
When I started using OpenBSD, I got tired of having to install Bash all the
time so I just stuck with ksh. That was several years ago. I don't know much
about shell programming nor do I do any configuring with ksh.
Now everytime I use linux, I find bash very annoying. I don't know why, I
just
I read in some business management book somewhere that took a Machiavelli
approach that said:
If you want to kill a project, send it to a committee.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:01:11 +0800, Lars Hansson wrote
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Put together a *BSD core ... representative from each camp and
Someone, who I consider very knowledgeable with BSD, liked dspam. Take a look
at that.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:19:54 +0200, Cedric Brisseau wrote
Hi all,
I must set up a mail gateway for my office. My boss is tired of spam
and I wonder what I can do. I haven't found similar cases in the
Can anyone recommend a good web-based file explorer program. I'd like to
setup a website with openbsd where users can
1) upload and download files and
2) give their customer's permission to upload and download files too.
It would be great if the program had the look and feel similar to windows
When I first got into linux and openbsd, I thought vi sucked. Then by reading
linuxtoday.com I ran into some articles about vi. One was from the creator of
vi and he explained why vi is the way it is (it was written in the days when
you didn't have a monitor, just a telepromptor). Then another
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:35:28 -0400, Martin Gignac wrote
On 10/19/06, Michal Soltys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can pipe ftp's output to restore.
Hey man, great idea! I'll try it out.
Thanks!
-Martin
--
Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names
the
Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure
they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc. Personally, I
think it should be the responsibility of the Windows users to secure
their own machines rather than relying on the kindness of others.
-Damian
I second that.
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:53:00 -0400, stuartv wrote
working on it). The reason we run AV at the border AND on the
inside boxes is quite simply that I have seen way too many times in
my carreer a virus be ignored by one AV package but caught by
another. Security is a must where I work and
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:28:41 -0400, STeve Andre' wrote
On Thursday 26 October 2006 20:16, smith wrote:
Some people like to run antivirus software on UNIX boxes to ensure
they're not carriers for Windows viruses, etc. Personally, I
think it should be the responsibility of the Windows
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:54:24 +0100, Marc Balmer wrote
stuartv wrote:
the network and share a couple network printers. I would
also like to use an encrypted file system on which to store
important data that needs to be protected (in case of theft
etc).
Why have your file server use an
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 19:55:50 -0500, Nick Guenther wrote
On 11/4/06, STeve Andre' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:09, Nick Guenther wrote:
Just came across this article:
http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/services.htm
So is he right?
-Nick
It
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:03:08 -0800, Dag Richards wrote
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Dec 17, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Dag Richards wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
Your security staff is clueless. I bet they like to block icmp
echo- request too.
Erm, I am don't think I am clueless, often a sign
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:34:43 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote
Me, I just tell everyone that whatever isn't on the SAMBA server can,
and will, be eaten. If the network was a bit bigger, I'd probably use
install images of some sort for the Windows boxes.
Joachim
Having supported
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:30:00 +1100, Rod.. Whitworth wrote
There is also G4U. It is based on NetBSD and will backup an entire
drive with whatever OS to an ftp server or it can do partitions
individually.
I've used g4u and really liked it. But it was slow and inefficient for
Windows when
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:00:48 +1100, Rod.. Whitworth wrote
1For me it was a one-off base install of OS+apps and lots of empty.
2I don't have Ghost. It costs $ even if never needed. In fact more
than the IBM recovery CD.
3We don't expect to reinstall often.
4 I don't have a samba server. G4U
Is there a way to install an image file from a server to a computer using a cd
that was burned with OpenBSD's cd40.iso?
Details:
I created an image of a computer and sent it to an ftp server after booting
from a cd that was burned with OpenBSD's cd40.iso. Here is the command I used
after
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:07:01 -0600, Damian Wiest wrote
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:53:48PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
smith wrote:
Why?:
I've received a few new computers that I have to configure.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#Multiple
Disk imaging
Unfortunately
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:38:37 -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote
May be if there was a way to distribute one own addition only may be
a good idea as then we could merge traplist from multiple locations
if one wants to do this. I wouldn't have any objection to make mine
available if that help.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:56:50 -0700, Darren Spruell wrote
IMHO you're trying to find a technical solution to a bigger problem.
Consider limiting the size of attachments that go through your email
gateway; SMTP isn't an efficient protocol for bulk file transfers,
and like you've found out your
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:04:50 +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote
Thanks, this is a much better explanation than in FAQ sec. 5. The explanation
in FAQ doesn't mention the fact that not only the -current, but also
the -stable is a moving target, though a slowly moving one.
Now I have 4.0-release and
On Saturday 27 August 2005 16:36, Simon Morgan wrote:
On 8/27/05, poncenby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've been using an Alcatel Speedtouch usb modem with openbsd 3.7 with no
problems. take a look...http://www.speedtouchdsl.com/prod330.htm
How stable has it been?
I use the same modem on a
OpenBSD 3.7
Some hosts will experience poor to seemingly no Internet access when
using NAT address pools - web sites time out, even pings to remote
addresses fail.
Using:
nat on $ext_if from !$ext_if - $ext_if:0
works fine.
Using:
nat on $ext_if from !$ext_if - $ext_if
or
nat on $ext_if from
On Friday 16 September 2005 04:20 pm, Raymond Lillard wrote:
First off, it's a bad idea to broadcast your real IP numbers
in a public place.
I had always thought that but then I read this article:
http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/dont-obscure-your-dns-data.html
It seems to make
On Friday 16 September 2005 04:13 pm, Ryan Puckett wrote:
In my experience, any protocols where the server will generate a
separate connection back to the client (like ftp) will not work with
NAT pools.
Even passive ftp?
nat on $ext_if inet from internal-subnets to any port
$NATPoolPortsTCP
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 06:19 am, Siju George wrote:
Any Idea if Jacek Artymiak is well??? I heard that he was sufferring
from some serious health problems:-(
Sometime back he told me that he was willing to allow his book
published in the Indian re-print if I could find an interested
Just an update.
It seems source-hash, for whatever reason, simply doesn't work for me. I
did find an older post that exhibits a similar issue:
http://www.monkey.org/openbsd/archive/bugs/0403/msg00211.html
Round-robin works fine, but source-hash will always leave some systems
blind to the
On Friday 23 September 2005 02:40 pm, John Marten wrote:
There's got to be a better way, and I'm open to suggestions.
Use a non-standard port and/or public key exchange.
Chris
On Friday 23 September 2005 03:15 pm, Mr.Slippery wrote:
That's how I handle this type of annoyance:
http://data.homeip.net/projects/ssh_wall.php
Slick. Er...slippery, that is.
Both Jacek's book and the pf faq,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html, state that queueing is
only useful for packets in the outbound direction.
Yet, I find examples that show inbound traffic being sent to queues.
On the faq page above there are these examples:
On Monday 26 September 2005 02:13 pm, viq wrote:
Traffic can be assigned to queue not necessarily on the
interface/direction the traffic takes effect on. Eg, you have queue
ftp_out, that is designed to let your desktop to upload to some sites
no faster than some speed, and of course the queue
On Thursday 29 September 2005 10:23 am, Bill wrote:
I am thinking pf on the dhcp server to those specific ip
addresses (wifi static ips) killing DHCP traffic. Since the AE
already has its own static IP and is set with dhcp info internally,
maybe it would decide its on its own and actually
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 03:38 pm, Peter Hessler wrote:
True, this is a limitation of the PPTP spec. Go slap the IT Staff,
and tell them to revert back to IPSec.
While I agree on what should be done to their IT staff, and that IPSec
(from what little I know) is superior, it may be an issue
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 04:32 pm, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
OpenBSD ignores the Call ID field in the GRE packets that PPTP
uses...
So a design decision?
Regarding the altq implementation in pf:
Is altq effective with all types of protocols/traffic, such as ah, esp,
gre, etc.?
Thanks.
Chris
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 01:54 am, Manpreet Singh Nehra wrote:
#NAT Rules
#Local Lan to Internet
nat on $ext_if1 from $lan_net to any - ($ext_if1)
nat on $ext_if2 from $lan_net to any
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 01:03 pm, Chris Smith wrote:
nat on !($int_if) from $lan_net to any - gateway_addresses \
round-robin sticky-address
Ooops...I think that () around $int_if will not work. Should read:
nat on !$int_if from $lan_net to any - gateway_addresses \
round
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:59 pm, jared r r spiegel wrote:
altq is as effective as your understanding of it and your
implementation
Well then I'm in real trouble :)
I'll try to hunt down that archived post. Thanks.
On Friday 07 October 2005 21:28, Joe S wrote:
Is anyone on the list running an Ultra 5 as firewall? I would like to
move my firewall from an overpowered P4-3GHz box to a Sun Ultra 5 360MHz.
Yes. My Sun Ultra 5 isn't just a firewall, but an NFS server with a relatively
large disk for my home
Hello,
Running 3.8, 2 nics, 1 statically assigned, and the other using dhcp.
Problem is that resolv.conf is always overwritten. Using
resolv.conf.tail doesn't help as the information is just tacked on at
the end of the dhcp supplied information.
How can I prevent the overwriting of
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 23:01, Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
man dhclient.conf
Thanks all.
supercede does the trick
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 07:38 am, Siju George wrote:
Now My /etc/dhclient.conf looks like this
These two lines worked fine here:
---
request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers;
supersede domain-name-servers 192.168.107.2;
Having some problems with two hardware vpn devices (a sonicwall and a
linksys) connecting through the openBSD 3.7 pf/nat firewall (just one
at this end).
It appears the the isakmp communication is fine. The state table shows:
-
self udp remote_vpn_ip:500 -
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 01:02 pm, Miguel wrote:
The pass rule on the rdr sentence only aplies to the gem0 interface?
Yes. I posted a similar query last Friday. See the thread titled rdr
clarification.
Am i missing something?
Maybe the docs are confusing in that regard. I also thought
On Thursday 03 November 2005 13:49, you wrote:
I'd rather
rely on ssh, keys, sudo, and scripts to do it.
Erm, perl scripts ARE scripts!
I assume the problem is not enough RAM because when I
add more RAM everything works fine.
Repeatable? Sure you've ruled out a seating problem?
R,
C
Hello,
i've been happily testing acpi following -current since six or seven
months,
and i've noticed a little regressions :
- before June, it worked perfectly, halt -p power-offs the machine, i have
acpi detected in dmesg.
- after around start of June, halt -p doesn't poweroff the machine
Anyone in or around Morgantown, WV USA?
Thanks,
Josh
Thanks,
But no, this isn't the case on the Zaurus.
The hw.cpuspeed sysctl is a read only value.
The machdep.maxspeed was introduced to scale up and down the hw.setperf
parameter on this system.
The Zaurus normally operates at 416Mhz, the sysctl.conf contains the line
machdep.maxspeed=520
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
in -current ftp-proxy can add tags, you can then pass the traffic
using a rule that matches those tags (e.g. tagged ftpproxy) and set
a label on that pass rule.
Hello,
Was actually looking at that last night but it didn't work the way I
Hello, and please help me retain what little hair I still have left :)
Basic scenario - 5 interfaces, 3 outside (public), 2 inside (private).
At this point I'm not trying to load balance just use different routes to the
outside world depending upon the source inside address.
I have tried
Just correcting the tables names (they do match, regardless of what I
previously typed).
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Chris Smith wrote:
Hello, and please help me retain what little hair I still have left :)
Basic scenario - 5 interfaces, 3 outside (public), 2 inside (private).
At this point I'm
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Since translation occurs before filtering the filter engine will see
packets as they look after any addresses and ports have been
translated.
I have read that in the docs but how to reconcile it with the ruleset on
On 8/28/07, Dave Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should all care, because there's actually an important question
buried in this: to what extent is it acceptable for 'the government' to
demand that someone make substantial or expensive changes in their life
merely for its convenience?
On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Craig Skinner wrote:
If you are using postfix:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
..
..
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_hostname
reject_invalid_hostname
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_non_fqdn_recipient
Maybe I've missed something but what makes it impossible to write a
device driver for the Wireless chipset?
-Josh
On 9/26/07, Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[diverted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 08:08:41AM -0700, big one wrote:
| OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) had
Previously posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received no replies so trying here.
Hello,
I'm using route-to to allow specific systems to use different external
interfaces and seeing a performance issue.
The performance issue is that normal web access is horrifically slow, yet when
doing a download
On Friday 05 October 2007, andrew fresh wrote:
It takes a while for the packets to figure out how to get through the
router, once they do, the states are set up and everything works as it
should. I can see that.
Seems that way.
Basic scenario is 2 internal interfaces (2 separate subnets)
On 10/12/07, David Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Theo,
My name is David Mack, and I am a recruiter for the Google.com engineering
team, a dynamic, challenging and fun group, which is responsible for our
Google website, from start to finish.
While doing a search for a specific skill set,
I'm wondering if anybody knows the stepping numbers of the ia32e
processors that implement the no execute bit properly in the page
tables?
I think this would be useful information for the amd64 page,
I know there is an errata on the core 2 boxes around this bit
effecting both cores when
Slightly OT, so feel free to move this to a new thread, but exactly
what would you use ifbound states to achieve?
Thanks,
Josh
On 10/20/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Joe Gibbens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-20 02:03]:
As Sebastian pointed out, you will need to do some state
On Saturday 20 October 2007, Chris wrote:
If anyone knows any known issues and would like to share
The last time I set an Apple base station up for someone the Apple setup
program was necessary and they only had Mac and Windows versions. There was
no CLI or web based front-end. Unless that
Out of curiosity what are these two extremely rare cases?
Thanks,
-Josh
On 10/20/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Joshua Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-20 13:05]:
Slightly OT, so feel free to move this to a new thread, but exactly
what would you use ifbound states to achieve
the named(8) man page is quiet excellent, if it doesn't cover what you
need, try googling for some bind stuff, most of the hits you get will
be for Linux, but the named.conf examples are in all likelihood still
relevant.
Thanks,
Josh
On 10/22/07, Regie H. Saberon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to make it work in Firefox? I seem
to recall there was a working method for Firefox+Flash
but I can't seem to remember/locate it. The port in
graphics mentions a plugin but it does not seem to get
built.
--- David Cathcart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you for some reason need
Yea, I can use Opera as well, but I also want to
figure out why the plugin doesn't compile with the
flash port and/or another method for getting flash up
in firefox.
--- JR Dalrymple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to make it work in Firefox? I
seem
to recall there was a working
I've been wondering about how to cope with random hardware failures when
data is being received from a WAN and written to local storage. As I
understand it, CARP(4) will enable any one of N machines to handle
incoming requests, so hardware failure of up to N-1 machines will be
handled.
But if
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:23:27 -0500
Jean-Christophe Sicard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
I'm trying to setup a pair of carp'ed firewalls on a cablemodem
connection with a single dhcp'ed IP.
The carp setup was a breeze on the internal interfaces where I have free
reing on IPs, but, not
vmware recently released a program which kind of
chroot jails the browser.
http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/vm/browserapp.html
im not a programmer myself, but i was wondering
if perhaps using a similar technique we could lock
down the browsers in openbsd?
seems to me that would increase security
1 - 100 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
