Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 03/14/2007 09:13:19 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
2007/3/13, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
Just a reminder: security-announce exists for messages like
this. Use
it or delete it.
While the bug
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
---
*security-announce* Security announcements. This low volume list receives
OpenBSD security advisories and pointers to security patches as they become
available.---Martin and Karl have valid points in their initial emails.
/Tony S
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL
on $inf_if proto udp from { $int_if:network 0.0.0.0 } \
port 68 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
I belive that dhcpd uses bpf to read the packets, it will see them no matter
how you configure your rules.
/Tony
Greg Thomas wrote:
On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl 0
-387620
c: 390721968 0 unused 0 0 # Cyl 0
-387620
Most likely, the disklabel or boot
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
Does the name really matter?
Yes.
Whether your partition is called 'a' or 'd', doesn't the disklabel
get stored into the beginning of the first
partition anyway?
No.
Actually, you have 16 partitions stored in the disklabel.
This is OpenBSD not DOS.
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
I read through the mailing list archives and found a thread
explaining that
the disklabel is stored around the beginning of partition 'a'
and that one
should allocate a small partition 'a' which should not be made
part of the
JBOD.
Joachim Schipper wrote
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 05:42:14PM -0800, smith wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:07:01 -0600, Damian Wiest wrote
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:53:48PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
smith wrote:
Why?:
I've received a few new computers that I have to configure.
website contains lots of quality documentation about
routing and routing protocols. The book Internet Routing Architectures
by Sam Halabi is also good.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
chefren wrote
snip
To get it started we should add some hooks of course, and when it's
working FFS should be dumped. Of course the database file system can
still save blobs, being Oracle database or whatever.
How do you use this elegant filesystem to bootstrap
the OS which handles this
Greetings!
~
Merry Christmas!
Wishing you...
and your family the Christmas season's joys and
wonders. Enjoy the holiday.
Sincerely,
AnthonysTshirts.com
~
AnthonysTshirts.com
2269 S. University Drive -
Marco S Hyman wrote:
snip
To me (and I'll be the first to
admit that this is nothing but opinion and I won't pretend that my opinion
is any better than yours) I see more harm than good in blocking icmp.
I like it when other people tell me I've screwed something up because I
can find it and
/Quagga.
Side comments?
Why is emacs in the ports tree when we have vi ?
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
some vague memory of it being the length of the data in the mbufs,
but I don't have any real understanding of what actually is being moved
around the kernel.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
Laurence Tratt
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:19:33AM +0100, Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
sometimes I get the right resolution (1280x1024) sometimes only standard
vga (600x480).
How can I tweak my system to get a reliable KDM with a resolution of
1280x1024?
I'm not sure exactly when, but at
Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
Now let us come to disklablels.
There is one disklabel per disk, not one disklabel per DOS partition.
The DOS partitions come into play only while the BIOS is booting
After that, the DOS partitions can contain any nonsense you like.
I suspect you'll do better with
to be full even
if it in reality is getting cained.
Since I'm stuck with PPP over DSL I have to modify the token
bucket regulator for the shaping to work well.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
On 08/10/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/10/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is asymmetric
What bandwidth have you configured the shaper for ?
Doh !
altq on $extif cbq bandwidth 500Kb queue { def, msn, www, https, smtp,
ssh, ftp }
What kind of link
-AAL5-LLCSNAP per queue so I could support
other type of links
also, but I can never find the time to actually do it.
Time to try to get the kids to sleep.
/Tony
On 08/10/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well its PPPoE over DSL here ..
also i ran the command pfctl -vvsq got
I wrote a stats script for PF that can show bandwidth per label.
http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
If you can identify your user with rules that match a label it would work.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help
PROTECTED]
On 22/09/06, edgar mortiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tony what version of openbsd r u using? can you send me a pkg_info
list so i can see what packages you have installed on your box as well
as the exact versions for python, mod_python and apache your using.
-eD
On 9/21/06, tony sarendal
Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
We know one reason why we never got documentation. Bit by bit more
information has come out to show that the hardware design is an
embarrasment and there are countless bugs and shortcomings.
Surprising? Not really.
Affects ONLY OpenBSD? Not a chance.
That's why
Andy Ruhl wrote:
On 8/30/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
Let me start by saying I'm probably not qualified to reply to this
thread, but I was never worried about making a fool out of myself
before so
On 23/08/06, Julien TOUCHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tony sarendal wrote on 22/08/2006 08:32:
I wrote a script to generate graphs for the queues using python and
rrdtool a while back when I needed it, although it only works with
CBQ. http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
awesome tool
On 23/08/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/08/06, Julien TOUCHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tony sarendal wrote on 22/08/2006 08:32:
I wrote a script to generate graphs for the queues using python and
rrdtool a while back when I needed it, although it only works
On 23/08/06, Julien TOUCHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tony sarendal wrote on 22/08/2006 08:32:
I wrote a script to generate graphs for the queues using python and
rrdtool a while back when I needed it, although it only works with
CBQ. http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
awesome tool
with CBQ.
http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
/Tony S
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
the
return packets
should end up in, and outbound keep state rule on the other side can specify
which queue the packets should use there.
Now it's all down to rule-set design, that is where the complexity, and in
the
end the strenght. of PF is.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
Will H. Backman wrote:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
Will H. Backman wrote:
The console on OpenBSD 3.9 release doesn't seem to log unknown username
or failed login attempts anywhere.
See this commit:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/syslog.conf#rev1.14
Make the default
with you.
maybe the
second part is just advertising hype...
it also has s/mime and gpg capabilities, is text based and does your
laundry.
I have used mutt for a while now and it does not do my laundry.
/Tony - bored to tears at the moment
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
Peter Philipp wrote:
[snip]
But little change by little change will isolate
insecurities until a system is secure, right? (didn't somene coin the
phrase security is a process?)
Little change by little change will isolate little insecurities.
Little change by little change will
in (1)?
With more memory it could in theory do what you want,
but in reality BGP is not the tool to use to when you run out
bandwidth on your 0.5M dsl line.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
good it performs). :)
I run the kernel pppoe on a 7616/448 kbps dsl link.
It works just fine and performance is good in both directions.
Well, as good as one can expect from PPPoE over ATM...
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I
this in /etc/fstab helps.
/dev/wd0b /tmpmfs rw,-m0,-s204800 0 0
and swap is encrypted by default
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sysctl vm.swapencrypt.enable
vm.swapencrypt.enable=1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/Tony
Peter Philipp wrote:
[snip]
I heard he bitches because he's right most of the time and people realise
this.
Actually 90+ percentile.
(Particularly when he ought to be only 50+ percentile)
Peter Philipp wrote:
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 02:10:05PM -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Peter Philipp wrote:
[snip]
I heard he bitches because he's right most of the time and
people realise
this.
Actually 90+ percentile.
(Particularly when he ought to be only 50+ percentile
apache out
of the system if you really think it's useful to you (or your diploma
exercise).
Cheers,
Rogier
--
If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
Read /etc/rc and understand everything in it.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
Hello,
I have a question about firewall rules on openbsd. Should I ask here for
help?
Tony
Nick Holland wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
...
IMNSHO, a root password for single user makes the system *LESS*
secure, and I'm dead serious. I would object to any attempt to commit
changes to OpenBSD to have one by default. Why? Real simple: *because
you asked this question*. - Now I'm
Siju George wrote:
On 6/17/06, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about
Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday, 17. June 2006 18:36, Deanna Phillips wrote:
...
As I see it, this is an example of working _against_ a project
instead of with and for it. A personal NIH syndrome, if you
will. It's not just some Linux thing he put together that also
works
Breen Ouellette wrote:
Darrin Chandler wrote:
Look, it's pretty obvious from early exchanges in this thread that these
issues have been discussed by the principal parties over a fairly long
period of time. How many brilliant insights have been added by this
thread? More important, has
Fred Crowson wrote:
Hi Misc,
I keep getting the following error, when trying to mount a 2GB Sony
Memory Stick Pro Duo (MSX-M2GN) in my Sony T7 digital camera:
nike:fred /home/fred sudo mount /mnt/t7
mount_msdos: /dev/sd1i on /mnt/t7: Inappropriate file type or format
Can anyone help me
hitting the spam traps ?
My email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been used as From address
by spammers, does that mean that I can't send you guys emails ?
Or do you do something else like teach spamassassin and record source
IP addresses ?
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
unused email addresses to spam traps,
what do they actually do with the received emails to reduce spam
to legitimate addresses ?
/T
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
in the thread I was expecting something else than
greytrapping.
Terms like spam reporting engine and older spam proxies indicated that
they were
talking about something else. I was interested in what that was.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied
Travers Buda wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:10:13 -0700
Hank Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
There has been some discussion of late on this list about Hifn's
policy with respect to releasing documentation to the general
public. That discussion lead to a great deal of uninformed
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:31:59PM +, Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hello,
My ntfs amd comaq diag. partition is not in the disklabel.
Unfortunately I don't know how to add correctly in the disklabel.
I've read the faq 14.16.1 but it only shows a modification.
Here
ultra10's seemed really quiet, and as a bonus my
manager stopped asking questions across the office.
/Tony
Eliah Kagan wrote:
On 6/6/06, Roger Neth Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even OpenBSDin my humble opinion, the safest operating system on the
planetis crackable, if you allow anyone to come and pound away at its
network interface.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1972281,00.asp
10/100 PHY, rev. 1
/Tony
Federico Giannici wrote:
I have just switched to a multiprocessing kernel (3.9-stable i386) with
a dual core Athlon 64.
I noticed that top command now have two CPUx rows, one for each CPU.
But iostat has only one cpu column.
Question 1: are the iostat's cpu values a mean of the values of
akonsu wrote:
in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service
packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a
service pack, this is not a proper implementation.
Exactly.
(And I don't seem to hear a lot about keeping OpenBSD patched
Adam wrote:
The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Methinks there is a problem with scalability if you cannot even
add two numbers together. (Well maybe with Lisp and infinite tapes)
Dijkstra had an analogy with comparing, as a means of
Adam wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:58:39 -0500 Tony Abernethy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Yes, and retarded posts like this aren't needed thanks.
Then what precisely
Henning Brauer wrote:
OpenBSD scales very well an most tasks you'll find.
There are some exceptions tho. That unfortunately includes threads.
Out of curiosity, what happens when you run apache on SMP hardware
where the libraries are not thread safe? (or whatever it's called)
Adam uttered following nonsense.
Linux programs have nothing to do with anything,
That is a good characterization of SMP and scaling?
and your desire to make a big stupid thread of bullshit is quite annoying.
You are annoyed.
My desire is a small thread.
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later
Marcin Wilk wrote:
Hi
I'm using OpenBSD 3.7 with default Apache with SSL over two
VirtualHosts witht he same IP.
Here is how it works in there:
NameVirtualHost *:80
NameVirtualHost *:443
Regardless of what you can put in any configuration,
Port 80, http 1.1+ (I think) allows you to
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 5/23/06, prad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:54, you wrot
You can consider short-circuiting of Boolean evaluation
greedy, but it a
feature which may also save clock cycles if the right-most
sub-expressions
are costly to evaluate.
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make installing
xbase a
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
I have used lynx for years as a file browser as well as web browser
(when I can) and it is routine for me to fix /etc/lynx.conf to show
me dotfiles.
Recently I need to inspect lots of text files and sometimes edit a few
so I set vi to be the system editor for lynx.
to protect the other customers in the network. A few of the attacks were
more clever
than just aiming at a customers site and also took out ISP infrastructure
like dns where
the domains were handled.
Aaahhh... the good old days...
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
SkyBlueshoes wrote:
I've just installed OpenBSD 3.8...my first ever *nix. I've got most up
and running, but I'm having problems recieving email. I followed the
guidelines on this page http://www.nomoa.com/bsd/mailServer.htm to the
letter. All the localhost tests work, but when I try to
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i have a single CSV file that is 2.5GB (!) unzipped which i need to either
partition into chunks or read from directly. trying to open it
with vi doesn't
work since 2.5GB 500MB, the size of the /var partition on this machine.
opening with vi gives a /var: write
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:14:06PM -0400, Adam wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2006 19:52:10 -0400 Dave Crawford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or another viable solution.
There's no solution because there's no problem. OpenBSD
doesn't randomly
reorder interfaces for
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I'm looking for some hints on evaluating load average.
You can't. It's a statement about job queue lengths, not about how
busy a machine is. And since different operating systems (and even
different versions) have made various tweaks to it over the years, it
is
dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
then why is kio accessing them?
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was
Peter Fraser wrote:
I was very surprised, that when I was installing
a 3.9 system, that you can use an empty root password
I accidentally entered a 'return' when it asked for the
root password, so I entered a 'return again when
I was asked to repeat the password, thinking that
a empty
Joseph C. Bender wrote:
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 5/6/06, Henrik Borgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ sudo fdisk wd0
Password:
Disk: wd0 geometry: 4864/255/63 [78140160 Sectors]
Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55
Starting Ending LBA Info:
#: idC H S -
Jacques wrote:
Florin Iamandi wrote:
Jacques dixit (2006-05-05, 12:58:02):
May we know, what kind of 'incident'?
Sounds like a security issue.
At this point nobody with a clue will take this or any of its
descendents seriously. Think.
Imagine I've just managed to crack the OpenBSD
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 5/6/06, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me, I'd take a closer look at that j OpenBSD partition.
It does NOT look like it corresponds to anything in the DOS partitions.
Whether or not you redo the disklabel from scratch,
the critical operation is writing
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Key mananagement is the most important part. The part that
continuously will require time and attention from a lot of people, and
the part that will cause the headaches. The part where the errors
will be made. System managers experiencing problems and needing to
get
The most popular way of managing passwords:
http://iatservices.missouri.edu/images/techknowledge/archive/secconn-0403.jpg
Guaranteed to not require any BLOB.
doesn't show any relevant traffic being blocked. NAT
is being used on both of these gateways, and all boxes inside each
respective gateway are able to reach the internet without problems.
Thanks in advance
Nathan Johnson
Did you enable ip forwarding, Nate ?
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL
Paulo Manoel Mafra wrote:
Hi misc,
I would like to create a large partition on a disk, but this disk has a
known bad block. How could I create the partition without the bad block ?
One solution is to create two partitions without the bad block and use
ccd. Is there another solution ?
Anton Karpov wrote
If he can break in as a lowly user uname -a will tell him what it is
anyway. And don't tell me we should disable that command or cause it to
lie because then I'll shoot you down another way.
Re-read my message, please. I didn't tell he cannot stat os version and
Cristiano Deana wrote:
Hi,
i'm new on OpenBSD. I just installed 3.9 (one week ago sources)
and i got this:
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9
$ su
Password:
you are not in group wheel
Sorry
$ whoami
cris
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
$ grep cris /etc/passwd
S t i n g r a y wrote:
Now what i want to know , maybe is O T in this list
but what is the diffrence , i mean pf in openBSD is
refered to as a firewall for home or small offices ?
why is that , i mean what is the criteria of an
enterprise firewall what is the diffrence between pf
MS ISA /
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 4/30/06, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I wonder what the preferred style of return statments is -- for
returning simple values, both styles
return foo;
and
return (foo);
are used in the sources everythen and now. For
js wrote:
2006/4/28, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder why http://www.openbsd.org/books.html still recommend old
daemon book, The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating
System?
As most of you know, there's newer version, The Design and
Implementation of the
prad wrote:
[snip]
(curiously, i've found on my system at least that some
things seem
to work faster on openbsd than freebsd.)
Shouldn't be a surprise, really.
Efficiency is really more a case of never being too inefficient
rather that occasionally being very efficient. (ie hard.)
Anything
internet routing.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
as an RFC 2796 route-reflector for this neighbor. An
option-
al cluster ID can be specified; otherwise the BGP ID will be
used.
which means that the peer is a route-reflector client.
Since the peer doesn't know it's a route-reflector client
there isn't any config for it.
/Tony
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 24.04.2006 at 15:30:55 -0400, Matthew Closson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ wrong IP address ]
What could that be, and why can't I see this address anywhere?
I'd rather not reboot only to make a change in IP numbers effective...
Can you send us
with the remote end MRU received during LCP neg. But since it
works
so well I haven't bothered with looking closer at it.
No idea about performance though, my almighty 2272/288 kbps line isn't
really enough
to make my firewall break a sweat.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
On 21/04/06, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 19.04.2006 at 12:57:16 +0100, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 19/04/06, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, if someone of you comes across good E3 cards, please drop me a
note. Otherwise, try
is to have pf make a DNS lookup on each and
every packet that arrives.
Good stuff, disarm the subject with humour.
/Tony
with thousands of routers to manage,
in the end nothing was better than writing my own tools.
I may be drunk now, but I do miss it.
/Tony
drink, cheers.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
haven't had a closer look at the different vendors of those as we used
Lucent and Nortel Ethernet over SDH equipment (of varying quality) at the
telco I used to work at, but there are man companies out there selling
this stuff. If you can find something which can run as a repeater go for
that.
/Tony
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
To increase the security level of my OpenBSD system I have defined at
/etc/fstab that the root partition should be read only. /etc/fstab
follows:
Me, I just lurk here but:
1) if having / ro would actually improve security,
they would have done so long
On 12/04/06, Sylvain Coutant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Shouldn't OpenBGP drop the session if the nexthop is not valid ?
Next hop and peer address does not have to be the same thing.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help
default to
yes for eBGP session and no for iBGP sessions. Would that fit most of
usual cases ?
That sounds like fixing a bug with an option.
In your case the problem is that a connected next-hop is considered invalid,
right ?
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion
On 12/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/04/06, Sylvain Coutant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was the state of the parent interface and what kind of interface
is
it?
Bge driver. It was up and running : BGP sessions were established
through the vlans reported
you mentioned in another thread ? The cluster-list seems a bit
screwed up when I trace the prefix from the router with the lowest metric.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
On 12/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:58:24PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 12/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
What was the state of the parent interface and what
)
-Bob
Me and my old Betamax vcr are just waiting for OpenIDRP to be included
in obsd. Stop whining and start implementig Claudio.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
can be when the family is out of the country =)
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
401 - 500 of 672 matches
Mail list logo
