On May 19, 2016 12:49:25 AM GMT+02:00, Igor Mironov
wrote:
>The packages and ports' FAQ mentions that those using doas need to pass
>keepenv { PKG_PATH } in the config file. Is there a way to instruct
>doas to take PKG_PATH (or another variable) from the target account's
>e
> Thank you Mart, Ted and Stuart--I understood that installpath in
> > > > pkg.conf provides a secure default, and PKG_PATH should probably
> > > > be used for overrides only (if at all).
> > >
> > > PKG_PATH is essential - installpath= in pkg.conf(5) w
; > pkg.conf provides a secure default, and PKG_PATH should probably
> > > be used for overrides only (if at all).
> >
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > PKG_PATH is essential - installpath= in pkg.conf(5) won't suffice
> > - if you don't want to build po
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:39:46PM BST, Igor Mironov wrote:
>
> > Thank you Mart, Ted and Stuart--I understood that installpath in
> > pkg.conf provides a secure default, and PKG_PATH should probably
> > be use
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:39:46PM BST, Igor Mironov wrote:
> Thank you Mart, Ted and Stuart--I understood that installpath in
> pkg.conf provides a secure default, and PKG_PATH should probably
> be used for overrides only (if at all).
Hi Igor,
PKG_PATH is essential - installpath= in p
st mirror, an idea to
set it in /etc/pkg.conf at install time, and leave PKG_PATH for the user.
t; Or in /etc/examples/pkg.conf.
>
> Which reminds the installer already picks the nearest mirror, an idea to
> set it in /etc/pkg.conf at install time, and leave PKG_PATH for the user.
[http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/distrib/miniroot/ins
tall.sub]
2259 # Crea
Thank you Mart, Ted and Stuart--I understood that installpath in pkg.conf
provides a secure default, and PKG_PATH should probably be used for overrides
only (if at all).
On Friday, 20 May 2016, 3:41, Mart Tõnso wrote:
There is an alternative to PKG_PATH env var:
http://man.openbsd.org
On 2016-05-19, Mart Tõnso wrote:
> Do feel free to select from the list of actual mirrors:
> http://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html
Or in /etc/examples/pkg.conf.
Do feel free to select from the list of actual mirrors:
http://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html
Mart
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> echo "installpath = http://your.favorite.mirror/"; > /etc/pkg.conf
>
>> .. and enjoy!
>
> Error from http://your.favorite.mirror/
> ftp: your.fav
> echo "installpath = http://your.favorite.mirror/"; > /etc/pkg.conf
> .. and enjoy!
Error from http://your.favorite.mirror/
ftp: your.favorite.mirror: no address associated with name
http://your.favorite.mirror/ is empty
:-)
There is an alternative to PKG_PATH env var:
http://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-current/man5/pkg.conf.5
echo "installpath = http://your.favorite.mirror/"; > /etc/pkg.conf
.. and enjoy!
Mart
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Igor Mironov wrote:
>> The p
Igor Mironov wrote:
> The packages and ports' FAQ mentions that those using doas need to pass
> keepenv { PKG_PATH } in the config file. Is there a way to instruct doas to
> take PKG_PATH (or another variable) from the target account's environment
> (~/.profile)?
No, but
On 2016-05-18, Igor Mironov wrote:
> The packages and ports' FAQ mentions that those using doas need to pass
> keepenv { PKG_PATH } in the config file. Is there a way to instruct doas to
> take PKG_PATH (or another variable) from the target account's environment
> (~/.pro
The packages and ports' FAQ mentions that those using doas need to pass keepenv
{ PKG_PATH } in the config file. Is there a way to instruct doas to take
PKG_PATH (or another variable) from the target account's environment
(~/.profile)?
and get issues with adding packages as a
>> :regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct setting for PKG_PATH but
>> :seems that the user environment isn't able to contact the source.
>> :
>> :As long as I change to 'root', everything works fine
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:16:13AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2016 Apr 07 (Thu) at 22:56:42 +0200 (+0200), Teno Deuter wrote:
> :Hi,
> :
> :just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding packages as a
> :regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct
On 2016 Apr 07 (Thu) at 22:56:42 +0200 (+0200), Teno Deuter wrote:
:Hi,
:
:just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding packages as a
:regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct setting for PKG_PATH but
:seems that the user environment isn't able to contact th
x27;t say anything about
>> 'root'.
>>
>> Also, why 'pkg_add' has to be run as root only? In previous OpenBSD version
>> this wasn't the case. Is that due to 'doas'?
>
> doas resets the environment.
> If you want to keep PKG_PATH then use something like this in doas.conf:
> permit keepenv { PKG_PATH } nopass :wheel
>
>
> --
> Antoine
run as root only? In previous OpenBSD version
> this wasn't the case. Is that due to 'doas'?
doas resets the environment.
If you want to keep PKG_PATH then use something like this in doas.conf:
permit keepenv { PKG_PATH } nopass :wheel
--
Antoine
7;doas'?
Thank you
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding packages
> as a
> > regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct setting for PKG_PATH but
> > seems that the user en
And how are you installing packages as a non root user?
On Apr 7, 2016 22:08, "Teno Deuter" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding packages as a
> regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct setting for PKG_PATH but
&
> just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding packages as a
> regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct setting for PKG_PATH but
> seems that the user environment isn't able to contact the source.
"Get issues" is not a valid problem r
Hi,
just installed a 5.9 AMD64 version and get issues with adding packages as a
regular system user. 'env' shows me the correct setting for PKG_PATH but
seems that the user environment isn't able to contact the source.
As long as I change to 'root', everything works
mirror selection
offers nearby mirrors first, and proposes a timezone).
> For example, if you set Japan as your zone, then run
> export PKG_PATH=http://www.ftp.ne.jp/OpenBSD/'uname -r'/packages/'uname -m'/
That should be arch -s (it matters for powerpc, arm, loongson etc),
zone, then run
>> export PKG_PATH=http://www.ftp.ne.jp/OpenBSD/'uname -r'/packages/'uname -m'/
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> use strict;
>
> chomp( my( $uname_r, $uname_m ) = ( `uname -r`, `uname -m` ) );
> chomp( my $zone = join( '/', ( spli
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, L.R. D.S. wrote:
> Is really boring write the package repository everytime we install.
> Why not set the repository using the Time Zone as a reference?
> For example, if you set Japan as your zone, then run
> export PKG_PATH=http://www.ftp.ne.jp/OpenBSD/'u
2015 at 06:55:50PM +, L.R. D.S. wrote:
>> Is really boring write the package repository everytime we install.
>> Why not set the repository using the Time Zone as a reference?
>> For example, if you set Japan as your zone, then run
>> export PKG_PATH=http://www.ftp.n
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 06:55:50PM +, L.R. D.S. wrote:
> Is really boring write the package repository everytime we install.
> Why not set the repository using the Time Zone as a reference?
> For example, if you set Japan as your zone, then run
> export PKG_PATH=http://www.ftp.n
Is really boring write the package repository everytime we install.
Why not set the repository using the Time Zone as a reference?
For example, if you set Japan as your zone, then run
export PKG_PATH=http://www.ftp.ne.jp/OpenBSD/'uname -r'/packages/'uname -m'/
.2.4p1 (installed)
Thanks for the help
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 at 9:04 PM
From: Adriaan
To: "OpenBSD general usage list"
Subject: Re: No address associated with PKG_PATH mirror
Works for me :)
root@rel56[~] echo $PKG_PATH
http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/OpenBSD/5.6/packages/amd64/
roo
Works for me :)
root@rel56[~] echo $PKG_PATH
http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/OpenBSD/5.6/packages/amd64/
root@rel56[~] pkg_info -Q mosh
mosh-1.2.4p1
root@rel56[~] dig ftp.nluug.nl
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> ftp.nluug.nl
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>H
IZE rcvd: 88
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 at 8:00 PM
From: "Cosmo Wu"
To: "John Smith"
Subject: Re: No address associated with PKG_PATH mirror
Hi ,
Is there anything wrong with the DNS or network connection on your OpenBSD box?
I could access that using the mirror.
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 at 8:06 PM
From: "John Smith"
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: No address associated with PKG_PATH mirror
Hello, I get the following error when using any of the pkg_* commands:$
echo $PKG_PATH
http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/OpenBSD/5.6/packages/amd64/ $ p
Hello, I get the following error when using any of the pkg_* commands:$
echo $PKG_PATH
http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/OpenBSD/5.6/packages/amd64/ $ pkg_info -Q
mosh
Error from http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/OpenBSD/5.6/packages/amd64/
ftp: ftp.nluug.nl: no address associated with
namehttp://ftp.nluug.nl
o?
>>
>> You do not have a `PKG_PATH` set for `pkg_add`. Would you like us to
>> set it for you? (Y/n) y
>>
>> Choose your nearest mirror:
>>
>> 1. Continent
>> 2. Whatever
>> 3. ...
>
> FWIW the idea of presenting the list of mirrors
d'origine-
> De : owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] De la part de
> Alexander Hall
> Envoyé : mercredi 24 septembre 2014 23:20
> Ã : Ville Valkonen
> Cc : PPC Miscellaneous Discussions
> Objet : Re: Why are there no PKG_PATH defaults?
>
> On 09/24/14 2
openda...@hushmail.com said:
> Then, in the event that someone installed via an ISO or some
> pre-defined VM (ie. a DigitalOcean droplets) -- how about a one-time
> script upon first root login to ask for such info?
>
> You do not have a `PKG_PATH` set for `pkg_add`. Would you l
embre 2014 23:20
À : Ville Valkonen
Cc : PPC Miscellaneous Discussions
Objet : Re: Why are there no PKG_PATH defaults?
On 09/24/14 23:09, Ville Valkonen wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what's wrong with the one that installer uses?
Nothing, however the installer only cares about a mirror if
to ask for such info?
You do not have a `PKG_PATH` set for `pkg_add`. Would you like us to
set it for you? (Y/n) y
Choose your nearest mirror:
1. Continent
2. Whatever
3. ...
There is currently no ports collection in `/usr/ports`. Would you
like us to get it for you? (Y/n)
I ca
>>script upon first root login to ask for such info?
>>
>> You do not have a `PKG_PATH` set for `pkg_add`. Would you like us to
>>set it for you? (Y/n) y
>>
>> Choose your nearest mirror:
>>
>> 1. Continent
>> 2. Whatever
>> 3. ...
&
On 24 September 2014, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> I thought this kind of "suggestion" are not answered anymore on this
> list ...
>
> @Ingo Schwarze: why don't you remove the files in /etc/examples and
> put some examples in man pages, for the apps that have no such thing
> yet?
I believe the new
Hi Mihai,
Mihai Popescu wrote on Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 08:19:39PM +0200:
> I thought this kind of "suggestion" are not answered anymore
> on this list ...
What i saw didn't look like a troll to me.
Sorry for the noise in case i accidentally fed one.
> @Ingo Schwarze: why don't you remove the fil
I thought this kind of "suggestion" are not answered anymore on this list ...
@Ingo Schwarze: why don't you remove the files in /etc/examples and
put some examples in man pages, for the apps that have no such thing
yet?
event that someone installed via an ISO or some
>pre-defined VM (ie. a DigitalOcean droplets) -- how about a one-time
>script upon first root login to ask for such info?
>
> You do not have a `PKG_PATH` set for `pkg_add`. Would you like us to
>set it for you? (Y/n) y
>
>
| -Original Message-
| From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On
| Behalf Of openda...@hushmail.com
| Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:01 AM
| Subject: Why are there no PKG_PATH defaults?
...
| Expanding on the whole
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
ow about a one-time
script upon first root login to ask for such info?
You do not have a `PKG_PATH` set for `pkg_add`. Would you like us to
set it for you? (Y/n) y
Choose your nearest mirror:
1. Continent
2. Whatever
3. ...
There is currently no ports collection in `/usr/ports`. W
/Alexander
>
>O.D.
>
>On 23. september 2014 at 1:47 PM, "Alexander Hall" wrote:On September
>23, 2014 3:00:41 PM CEST, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>Expanding on the whole
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_over_configurati
Hi,
Harald Dunkel wrote on Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:22:32PM +0200:
> I completely agree, but that seems 2b the case for _all_ files in
> /etc/examples (or for config files in general).
Not really all. Take dhcpd.conf for example. Here the complexity
comes from the fact that a wide variety of st
On 24 September 2014 14:12, Barbier, Jason wrote:
> Just to point out if you do an install where you do select a mirror your
> mirror settings do seem to persist beyond the install, so it sounds like
> the problem is solved and user education is in order.
>
> *washes hands of the problem*
>
> --
>
Just to point out if you do an install where you do select a mirror your
mirror settings do seem to persist beyond the install, so it sounds like
the problem is solved and user education is in order.
*washes hands of the problem*
--
Jason Barbier | jab...@serversave.us
Pro Patria Vigilans
e:
> > OpenBSD solution is to ask the user to choose a mirror at
> installation time.
>
> I don't see this preference being remembered after the installation
> though.
>
> O.D.
>
> On 23. september 2014 at 1:25 PM, "ludovic coues" wrote:> why aren't
> Because your "sane default" includes ftp.openbsd.org, which is not
sane at all. If PKG_PATH or /etc/pkg.conf were set to default to
ftp.openbsd.org then that host would get hammered instead of the user
being put in the position of choosing a local mirror.
The proper local
> OpenBSD solution is to ask the user to choose a mirror at
installation time.
I don't see this preference being remembered after the installation
though.
O.D.
On 23. september 2014 at 1:25 PM, "ludovic coues" wrote:> why aren't
there any sane PKG_PATH defaults? I
nfiguration thing --
>why aren't there any sane PKG_PATH defaults? Ie.:
>
>release=$(uname -r)
>architecture=$(uname -p)
>
>export
>PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/${release}/packages/${architecture}/
Because /etc/pkg.conf ?
/Alexander
>
>Thanks!
>
>O.D.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Ingo,
On 09/24/14 11:29, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Harald Dunkel wrote on Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:14:21AM +0200:
>
>> This is something that could be added to /etc/examples. See the attachment
>> suggesting a first version.
>
> I hate th
t; # loglevel = 0
>
> # URL to package repository updated during installation. Used
> # for accessing packages if the environment variable PKG_PATH
> # is not defined and no further options are defined.
> # installpath =
>
> # Set to yes to waive checksums during package deletions.
> # nochecksum = yes
>
> # Set to yes to display (done/total) number of package
> # messages.
> # ntogo = yes
On 09/23/14 15:48, Alexander Hall wrote:
> On September 23, 2014 3:00:41 PM CEST, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Expanding on the whole
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_over_configuration thing --
>> why aren't there any sane PKG_PATH d
On September 23, 2014 3:00:41 PM CEST, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Expanding on the whole
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_over_configuration thing --
>why aren't there any sane PKG_PATH defaults? Ie.:
>
>release=$(uname -r)
>architecture=$(unam
Hi,
Expanding on the whole
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_over_configuration thing --
why aren't there any sane PKG_PATH defaults? Ie.:
release=$(uname -r)
architecture=$(uname -p)
export
PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/${release}/packages/${architecture}/
Thanks!
O.D.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:42:24PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:39:35 +0100
> Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>
> > > Sorry, I should have specified that I have FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in
> > > /etc/mk.conf.
>
> I found when using fetch_packages I had to use make install rather than
>
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:39:35 +0100
Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> > Sorry, I should have specified that I have FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes in
> > /etc/mk.conf.
I found when using fetch_packages I had to use make install rather than
make package. Hardly a big deal, but is that expected?
THX to all for insight
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010-11-10, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> >> Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
> >> have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
> >>
> >
> > By which
> Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
> have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
>
By which exact syntax?
On 2010-11-10, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
>> Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
>> have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
>>
>
> By which exact syntax?
>
>
pkg_add(1) gives you the syntax, personally I don't see much advantage
to listing
> You found that so no problem ;-) Now you can do rm -rf /usr/ports and
> then unpack ports.tar.gz for 4.8 release again
I just wish there was some way to get gnash 0.88 on stable...that was
really the only reason I tried to upgrade. Do the packages in current
normally find themselves in the next
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
>> Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
>> have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
>>
>
> By which exact syntax?
It's written in FAQ and in man. Use colon ( : ) for separation of entries.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Ersin Akinci wrote:
> Do the packages in current
> normally find themselves in the next release?
>
Yes.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ersin Akinci wrote:
>> But you wrote that you upgraded ports from release to current. Did you
>> upgrade your system to current too?
>>
>> Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
>> have couple of them in
> But you wrote that you upgraded ports from release to current. Did you
> upgrade your system to current too?
>
> Every time use mirrors for packages, it saves bandwidth and you can
> have couple of them in PKG_PATH.
Quoth section 15 of the FAQ: "Do NOT check out a -current p
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Ersin Akinci wrote:
>> read this first http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html
>>
>> ports don't use PKG_PATH, but AnonCVS for updates/upgrades. Ports are
>> using PKG_PATH only when you set FETCH_PACKAGES see here
>> http://ww
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Ersin Akinci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded my ports tree from 4.8 release to current, but now
> it's not detecting any dependency packages in my PKG_PATH. B PKG_PATH
> is set to the main openbsd.org package site and pkg_add works
>
> read this first http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html
>
> ports don't use PKG_PATH, but AnonCVS for updates/upgrades. Ports are
> using PKG_PATH only when you set FETCH_PACKAGES see here
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=ports&sektion=7
Sorry, I should ha
Hi,
I recently upgraded my ports tree from 4.8 release to current, but now
it's not detecting any dependency packages in my PKG_PATH. PKG_PATH
is set to the main openbsd.org package site and pkg_add works
perfectly fine. I did notice that I was trying to use ports earlier
tonight w
I am having trouble upgrading to 4.6. I always upgrade from a local
master repository. First, from the latter I set up reverse port
forwarding on the target server so that
PKG_PATH=http://localhost:/
Then I do:
pkg_add -v -ui -F update -F updatedepends -F alwaysupdate
The error I get is
an page (for 4.5) states:
> >>
> >> "If a given package name cannot be found, the directories named by
> > B ^^^
> >> PKG_PATH are searched. B It should contain a series
> >> of entries separated by colons. B Each ent
nnot be found, the directories named by
> B ^^^
>> PKG_PATH are searched. B It should contain a series
>> of entries separated by colons. B Each entry consists of a directory
>> name. B URL schemes such as FTP, HTTP, HTTPS, or SCP are also
>> appro
, the directories named by
> > >^^^
> > > > PKG_PATH are searched. It should contain a series
> > > > of entries separated by colons. Each entry consists of a directory
> > > > name. URL schemes such as FTP, HTTP, HTTPS, or S
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:41:44PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:56:49AM +, Jacob Meuser said that
> > > "If a given package name cannot be found, the directories named by
> >^^^
> > > P
hmm, on Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:56:49AM +, Jacob Meuser said that
> > "If a given package name cannot be found, the directories named by
>^^^
> > PKG_PATH are searched. It should contain a series
> > of entries separated by co
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> I've had this problem for a long time (over many OpenBSD releases).
>
> The pkg_add man page (for 4.5) states:
>
> "If a given package name cannot be found, the directories named by
> PKG_PATH are searched. It
the directories named by
^^^
> PKG_PATH are searched. It should contain a series
> of entries separated by colons. Each entry consists of a directory
> name. URL schemes such as FTP, HTTP, HTTPS, or SCP are also
> appropriate."
>
> On a client machine:
>
> PKG_PATH=htt
I've had this problem for a long time (over many OpenBSD releases).
The pkg_add man page (for 4.5) states:
"If a given package name cannot be found, the directories named by
PKG_PATH are searched. It should contain a series
of entries separated by colons. Each entry consists of a
dard package:
>
> B http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#Included
>
> Dankeschoen...
>
> -Original Message-
>>From: Mike Erdely
>>Sent: May 14, 2009 1:59 PM
>>To: Fortunato
>>Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>>Subject: Re: Help with PKG_PATH=
>>
&
8 PM
>>To: Fortunato
>>Cc: OpenBSD-misc list
>>Subject: Re: Help with PKG_PATH=
>>
>>Eee???
>>
>>http://www.openbgpd.org/
>>
>>Why are you trying "something" with "some" package?OpenBGPD is in base.
>>
>>And /root
Newbie slap to head - D'OH!
I'm gonna have to memorize the standard package:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#Included
Dankeschoen...
-Original Message-
>From: Mike Erdely
>Sent: May 14, 2009 1:59 PM
>To: Fortunato
>Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>Subject: Re:
m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
>> Jacob Meuser
>> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 12:48 PM
>> To: misc@openbsd.org
>> Subject: Re: Help with PKG_PATH=
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:30:52AM -0700, Francisco Valladolid Hdez.
wrote:
>
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:39:13PM -0700, Fortunato wrote:
> I'm also having a problem but with PKG_PATH:
>
> # pwd
> /root/Desktop
> # ls -l openbgpd-4.4.1.tgz
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 163070 May 1
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:39:13PM -0700, Fortunato wrote:
> # pwd
> /root/Desktop
> # ls -l openbgpd-4.4.1.tgz
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 163070 May 13 18:08 openbgpd-4.4.1.tgz
> # export PKG_PATH=/root/Des
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
> Jacob Meuser
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 12:48 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Help with PKG_PATH=
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:30:52AM -0700, Francisc
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:30:52AM -0700, Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Jose Perez Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > From: Jose Perez Rodriguez
> > Subject: Help with PKG_PATH=
> > To: misc@openbsd.org
> > Date: Thursday
Hi
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Jose Perez Rodriguez wrote:
> From: Jose Perez Rodriguez
> Subject: Help with PKG_PATH=
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 6:41 PM
> Today i was installing OpenBSD 4.5
> and i type:
> export PKG_PATH=ftp://tp.openbsd.org/pub
On 2009-05-14, Jose Perez Rodriguez wrote:
> Today i was installing OpenBSD 4.5 and i type:
> export PKG_PATH=ftp://tp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386/
> chmod u=rwx /home
> PKG_CACHE=/home
> pkg_add k3b
>
> But when i type "pkg_add k3b", is not wo
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jose Perez Rodriguez
wrote:
> Today i was installing OpenBSD 4.5 and i type:
> export PKG_PATH=ftp://tp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386/
"tp.openbsd.org"?
Today i was installing OpenBSD 4.5 and i type:
export PKG_PATH=ftp://tp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386/
chmod u=rwx /home
PKG_CACHE=/home
pkg_add k3b
But when i type "pkg_add k3b", is not working, and the url says "
ftp://tp.openbsd.org//pub/OpenBSD/4.5/packages/i386/&qu
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:28:36 +0530
Siju George wrote:
> What did I do Wrong?
>
> The command I Issued was
>
> # pwd
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD
> # patch
> PackageRepository.pm /var/software/patches/PackageRepository.pm
>
# man diff
# man patch
# cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD
#
On 2/3/09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> This diff removes the extra / and hasn't broken anything yet
> in my testing (add/update with ftp and http):
>
Hi,
This Diff failed to apply.
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Index:
On 2009-02-03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, Siju George wrote:
>> I have this in my PKG_PATH variable
>>
>> $ echo $PKG_PATH
>> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.4/packages/i386/
>> $
>>
>> When I try to update a package it sho
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, Siju George wrote:
> I have this in my PKG_PATH variable
>
> $ echo $PKG_PATH
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.4/packages/i386/
> $
>
> When I try to update a package it shows an error
>
> $ sudo pkg_add -ui firefox3
> Error from ftp:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Simen Stavdal wrote:
> From the error message you are getting, it seems it cannot find the host
> ftp.openbsd.org...
> Can you connect to it from a command line (i.e ftp ftp.openbsd.org)?
>
No I was not able to. When I fixed that the update is working.
Thankyou so
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
