Re: Building 6.4.2p1 without ssl?

2019-09-03 Thread Ede Wolf
at the end of the week. Thanks to all for your help again Ede. Am 02.09.19 um 16:29 schrieb gil...@poolp.org: September 2, 2019 9:48 AM, "Ede Wolf" wrote: Hello, trying to compile opensmtp it fails with openssl errors, so I've tried to specify --without-libssl at configu

Building 6.4.2p1 without ssl?

2019-09-02 Thread Ede Wolf
Hello, trying to compile opensmtp it fails with openssl errors, so I've tried to specify --without-libssl at configure time, as at least for testing and learning the basics it is not really that important, but it does not seem to get honored. Any idea, what I may have to change? Thanks

Re: Virtual User handling

2019-09-02 Thread Ede Wolf
back Thanks again Ede Am 31.08.19 um 19:14 schrieb Edgar Pettijohn: On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:14:37PM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 05:00:24PM +0200, Ede Wolf wrote: Hello, Semi complete example at the bottom. I'll leave it to you to reverse translate to th

Re: Virtual User handling

2019-09-07 Thread Ede Wolf
So it is a binary, thats useful information. Having specified /opt/smtpd as prefix during ./configure, it is located here: /opt/smptd/libexec/opensmtpd/mail.lmtp Throw it in /usr/local/libexec/smtpd/ and see what happens. May be a build tools bug. Excellent idea, however, the error stays

Re: Virtual User handling

2019-09-08 Thread Ede Wolf
Looks like lmtpd isn't running. Not sure wether there is such a thing as a lmtpd service? lmtpd is the name of the user, that is supposed to connect to the socket. A bit unlucky naming maybe, but the "d" stands

Re: Virtual User handling

2019-09-06 Thread Ede Wolf
2d5ac7196 from= to= rcpt= user=lmtpd delay=11s result=TempFail stat=Error (temporary failure: "mail.lmtp: No such file or directoryconnect") debug: mda: session 2c4cbc6e7f005bc1 done debug: mda: user "lmtpd" becomes runnable debug: mda: all done for user ":lmtpd" Am 0

Re: Virtual User handling

2019-09-08 Thread Ede Wolf
https://manpages.debian.org/testing/cyrus-common/cyrus-lmtpd.8.en.html Sorry. Great idea, but AFAIK the cyrus lmtpd is activated on demand by the cyrus master process. But I can verify, that either the unix- or the tcp socket are there. And the unix socket is writeable by the opensmtpd

Re: Virtual User handling

2019-09-08 Thread Ede Wolf
r your time, support and hints. I'll silently try to figure out the cause for the change in the errormessage and then we may move on to filtering. Thanks very much again! Ede Am 08.09.19 um 17:22 schrieb Reio Remma: On 07.09.2019 12:53, Ede Wolf wrote: Excellent idea, however, the error stays

Re: Virtual User handling

2019-09-06 Thread Ede Wolf
Maybe run 'smtpd -dv -T expand -T lookup -T rules' and see how OpenSMTPD is translating the aliases and which rules it's matching etc. This is a really helpful command. Maybe using that I can be a bit more precise in defining my confusion. My simple setup, git pulled and build yesterday:

Re: Portable buildung issues

2019-10-22 Thread Ede Wolf
Sorry, it's a gentoo linux system Ede On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:45:43AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > we really really really need more details, I have no idea what system that is > :-) > > October 22, 2019 1:38 PM, "John Smith" wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > cloned today, I am having

Re: Portable buildung issues

2019-10-23 Thread Ede Wolf
ck to OpenSSL if not possible. > > Some features may be lacking when doing that fallback, > for instance ECDSA server certificates will only work if linked against > LibreSSL. > > > > October 22, 2019 7:01 PM, "Ede Wolf" wrote: > > > Thanks for

Re: Portable buildung issues

2019-10-22 Thread Ede Wolf
Thanks for the heads up. Last time I have been using libressl 2.9.2, I'll give 3.0.1 a go, it happens to be in the repos as well, just not marked as stable. Ede Am 22.10.19 um 16:28 schrieb Gilles Chehade: Sorry, will expand: We're in between two LibreSSL releases which is why the

Re: Handling of mailing list (or other non system) accounts

2019-10-06 Thread Ede Wolf
Hello Edgar, thanks for getting back. The interesting part, I've never seen this mail/question actually make it to this list. I have posted a follow up message, that I also have not seen make it to the list, where the problem has been marked as solved. It turned out to me initially misreading