> as you see in the truss output.
>
> Not sure if this tells you anything or not.
>
This should definitely be added to the ticket.
I don't have an immediate solution for you, I need to have a deeper look
at this, but could you try using the db: backend and let me know if this
al
issue.
A ticket has been opened on our tracker at github, can you:
- open a ticket for the first issue
- check if your second issue is appropriately described by ticket #642
and either add a comment to it with as much details as you can, or
open a different ticket if it's a different issue ?
thanks
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
> if test x"${with_python}" != x""; then
> > - PYTHON_CONFIG="${python_prefix}/bin/python-config"
> > + PYTHON_CONFIG="${python_prefix}/bin/python2-config"
> > fi
> >
> > if ! test -f $PYTHON_CONFIG;
me know if you keep receiving unsubscribe
confirmation requests that you didn't trigger yourself.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send
thank you for your comment :-)
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:39:36AM +0200, Antonio.C wrote:
> Thank you for the news and all your work.
>
> And thank you for Opensmpt. It's amazing.
>
> Good bye,
>
> Antonio
>
> Le 09/10/2015 19:40, Gilles Chehade a ?crit :
n Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>> EHLO package maintainers,
>>
>> It would be nice if we had a list and-or IRC channel to communicate with
>> you and synchronize before releases.
>>
>> Should I setup something ?
>>
>&g
EHLO package maintainers,
It would be nice if we had a list and-or IRC channel to communicate with
you and synchronize before releases.
Should I setup something ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you
other hackers get to peer-review.
This was discussed before the Qualys advisory came out, it is clear that
we have been off-tree for too long, and it is putting a lot of burden on
our team.
We're going to release 5.7.4 shortly with some security improvements and
a few assorted minor bug fixe
ugh, it might
take some time before we can effectively remove it. There are also
some consequences in the message parser and filter path that need to
be assessed first.
This is where we're going anyways
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
ldir
> "/var/mail/%{user.username}/"
^^^--- doesn't match this rule (not a local connection)
> accept from any for domain keda.io alias deliver to maildir
> "/var/mail/%{user.username}/"
^^^--- doesn't match this rule (not matching domain)
> accept
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 06:51:22AM +, andreas wrote:
>
>
> On 2015-10-05 17:03, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 12:14:34PM +, andreas wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 2015-10-02 12:25, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Oct
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 12:14:34PM +, andreas wrote:
>
>
> On 2015-10-02 12:25, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:39:11AM +, andreas wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Thank you for your support and replies. I will be able to test this
ted directly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot and
Sunil Nimmagadda.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you
27; openbsd-compat/pidfile.c
>
> This isn't very pretty. Is there a switch to --configure for making
> this happen? And if not, could one be added to the portable branch?
>
yes, please fill a feature request on the tracker
it won't be part of the release i'
ind move.
He has a different opinion and thinks he was helpful.
What's done is done, please don't let this thread grow, we now know that
we'll have to face this from within our community.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @po
, buf);
+
+ log_trace(TRACE_FILTERS, "filter: filter_tx_io: datain (%zu)
for req %016"PRIx64"",
+ len, s->id);
n = fwrite(data, 1, len, s->ofile);
if (n != len) {
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.o
machine that worked, I
> figured that the buffer overflow must be happening AFTER format specifier
> expansion. When I filled in the values by hand I ended up with the magical
> number of 256 after which my command execution was clipped.
>
> So, here is my question, is this a feature
al user to do it and it would still only
affect an unprivileged process.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
t; case they want to chime in too.
>
I'll chime in.
As we made clear in the commits and release note these issues were found
by Qualys Security during an audit, for which they're going to publish a
detailed advisory (very good read) with CVE associated to each issue.
> ---
gure.ac is bogus.
we should not be shipping arc4random() in the portable layer.
if you're using LibreSSL, or your system provides arc4random() that is
what we should be using.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail b
ur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot and
Sunil Nimmagadda.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subsc
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:52:29PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:15:57PM +, andreas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Hi,
>
>
> > Ok, so I compiled it all on my laptop. I'm running libressl-2.2.3 and
> > opensmtpd-5.7.1p1
>
cken-egg problem that needs to be solved somehow.
We'll discuss this shortly and think of a solution.
It was reported by someone else on bugs@ too.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subs
Hi,
Sorry guys, with the holidays + swamp at work we've been a bit away from
the mailing list these last few weeks.
I'll be having a look at all unanswered mails, and will start processing
tickets and pull requests again this week.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www
8689.1443178419800.JavaMail.www@wwinf1c20>
>
>
> By the way, thank you for this great piece of software. Configuring it and
> using is so pleasant!
> I use OpenSMTPD 5.4.1/5.4.2 on Linux as a personal mail server.
>
Thanks ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:18:02PM +0200, Donovan Watteau wrote:
> 2015-08-29 15:00 GMT+02:00 Gilles Chehade :
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:27:29PM +0200, Donovan Watteau wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm configuring OpenSMTPD 5.7.1p1 on Debian 7.8.
>
looking
> > for:
> >
> > accept sender "f...@foo.foo" for any relay via $myrelay
> > accept for any relay
>
> sender expects a table(5) not a single address.
>
A single address gets converted to a table containing that single address,
it is ok
--
gt;
> Unfortunately, my email is never relayed through $myrelay, although
> "From: f...@foo.foo" is set. Am I misunderstanding what "sender" is
> about?
>
It uses the SMTP-level sender, not the DATA-level sender.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
-- Forwarded message --From: Gilles Chehade Date: Aug 27, 2015 8:15 AMSubject: Re: OpenSMTPD 5.7.1 portable - received invalid command RCPT TO ...To: Alan Cheng Cc: Sorry, short answer cause not on computer:
Look at your IP address in log, then look at ruleset, you should find the
ase it is.
Assuming the OpenSMTPD enqueuer was used, quoted-printable encoding gets
used when there is a line that exceeds a certain size and the MUA hasn't
provided an encoding of its own.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You recei
e're in
an 8-bit byte world... and I guess in 2015 we can just do the same.
I'll remove the code that distinguishes between both and make 8BITMIME a
no-op, which fixes your issue as far as I can see.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
recipients as described in
aliases(5):
user1 otheruser
us...@example.org otheruser1,otheruser2
@example.orgotheru...@example.com
@ catch...@example.com
--
Gilles Che
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:56:36PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 01:04:02PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:16:58PM +0100, Luis wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've cloned the opensmtpd git repository
thubusercontent.com/libressl-portable/portable/master/include/err.h
>
> Are these commits really necessary?
>
Hi,
I'll have a look at this regression.
Can you open a ticket on our tracker at github ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
uot; [...] - no
accept from any for domain "aoi.mydns.jp" [...] - no
accept for local [...] - no
accept for local [...] - no
accept from local for any relay < 6.2.236.211 is not local
reject from any for any <--- this is still unneeded
so either you
gt; HAVE_DB_API])])
>
Thanks for your diff, the issue was fixed in git a week ago:
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/commit/73c9b16dd65b6656e2c8f7ccdfd4eb887bcbf56d
It will be part of upcoming snapshots + next minor release
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
lish lot
of concurrent connections that will send enless streams of bytes to fill
your memory until it exhausts and your server is rendered unusable.
limits guarantee that at one given time a client is not taking more than
a pre-established amount of resources.
--
Gil
-4B6D-B041-4150C3143099"
> <<< [MSG]
> <<< [MSG]
> <<< [MSG] --Apple-Mail=_1D1CF9DB-435D-4B6D-B041-4150C3143099
> <<< [MSG] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> <<< [MSG] Content-Type: text/plain;
> <<< [MSG] cha
that major versions match (ie: extras with
a version of 5.8.x will only work with OpenSMTPD 5.8.x).
The tarball should be available from our main site in a few minutes.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because
hwhile, where would the most appropriate place to
> implement them be; spamd or the OpenSMTPD daemon?
>
IMO a filter would be the appropriate place.
I'm currently looking at the rspamd project and considering a filter.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
0x147357517000: >>> 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
>
> ...lots of <<< [MSG]...
>
Problem lies precisely in the [MSG] you have obfuscated ;-)
I'm fairly confident that your mail does not have headers + body
> smtp: 0x147357517000:
fixes are concerned there are no plans to support
them in the daemon itself, it has implications [1], but it's likely that
a filter to transparently translate suffixes will happen.
[1] https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/issues/476
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
the project is at:
#OpenSMTPD @ irc.freenode.net
Reporting Bugs:
===
Please read http://www.opensmtpd.org/report.html
Security bugs should be reported directly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Cheha
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:51:30PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:31:49AM +0300, T??r??k Edwin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > With OpenSMTPD 201506112227p1 'smtpctl show queue' doesn't show the queued
> > messages, IIRC this used to
are using ?
how/where did you build / install smtpd ?
can you reproduce ?
the tempfai...@opensmtpd.org address can be used to test for this.
please let me know as soon as you can, this is the last pending issue
before I tag the 5.7.1 release.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:57:27PM -0700, Seth wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:55:21 -0700, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >what is is that you experience in this setup ?
> >it builds but fails at startup ?
>
> It build and runs fine, however the binaries is not linked to the la
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:57:27PM -0700, Seth wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:55:21 -0700, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >what is is that you experience in this setup ?
> >it builds but fails at startup ?
>
> It build and runs fine, however the binaries is not linked to the la
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:53:34PM -0700, Seth wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:46:08 -0700, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >The subject being:
> >
> >Re: OpenSMTPD build process does not recognize newer LibreSSL 2.1.4
> >libraries
>
> The original issue from Marc
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:41:02PM -0700, Seth wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:38:54 -0700, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >You installed LibreSSL 2.2.0 on top of OpenBSD 5.7 ?
> Correct
> >Previous versions worked ?
> If you mean OpenSMTPD would compile with updated LibreSSL libra
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:10:57PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > Ran into this problem again on OpenBSD 5.7 with LibreSSL 2.2.0. Previously
> > posted solution only works for one of the two libraries in /usr/local/lib
> >
> > $ ldd /usr/sbin/smtpd
> >
>
>
>
> Is the above syntax correct and would it work successfully?
>
Nope, it won't work ... yet.
It won't work with our upcoming major release 5.7.1, but if you open a
ticket on our tracker, I can fix before the next one.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.pool
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:03:06PM +0200, Cedric Berger wrote:
> Hello
>
> On 23/06/15 21:26, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >Don't be confused by the "rc" tag, this is release material
>
> Only Linus is confused with that ;)
>
> >You can obtain that publi
rc1.sum.sig
Portable version:
-
tarball: https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-5.7.1p1-rc1.tar.gz
sha+sig: https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-5.7.1p1-rc1.sum.sig
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You rece
t; 0df4d870 0df4d870 rtld 01 0
> /usr/libexec/ld.so
>
> Any troubleshooting suggestions?
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
s you write it yourself and send us a pull request, or find a
developer willing to be sponsored to write that feature, you're in
for a long wait ;-)
> By the way - found OpenSMTPD setup quick and easy
>
> NICE WORK ;-)
>
Thanks :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
iners to detect packaging errors in our portable layer.
Help us make this release good !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to:
A new opensmtpd portable snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-201506112227p1.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-201506112227p1.tar.gz) =
f938796d2655f554e695adff6a3f3bbc4b1326912327b98acc7e29f705b9cf63
A summary of the content of this snapshot is ava
A new opensmtpd snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-201506112224.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-201506112224.tar.gz) =
5057b0cd8a216f5067d6969ba7abaef9d51a38f9a7194ef09289996c62f176a2
A summary of the content of this snapshot is available below.
rting Bugs:
===
Please read http://www.opensmtpd.org/report.html
Security bugs should be reported directly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot, Charles Longeau
and Sunil Nimmagadda.
--
Gilles Cheh
e reported directly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot, Charles Longeau
and Sunil Nimmagadda.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:14:31PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I have no clue at all! The problem still happens. But its frequency is
> random.
can you with with -dv ?
we need at least some traces to debug
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poo
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:52:31PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Just realized my reply was off-list so here it is again in case someone
> hits teh same bug:
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:43:55PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > I've hit this twice now, with smtpd ju
his machine + our stress test machine for a while
now and we have not observed any issue whatsoever.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:51:26PM +0300, T?r?k Edwin wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 10:15 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The last snapshot switches from 1024-bits to 2048-bits DH parameters.
> >
> > We need as many people as possible to run with this to d
.
Tomorrow we'll be publishing OpenSMTPD 5.4.6 and 5.4.6p1, they are minor
releases identical to 5.4.5 except that the bug fix applied.
You are highly encouraged to update as soon as we release.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You rec
> AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_DB_API], [test $use_db_api = 1])
>
> +AM_COND_IF([HAVE_DB_API], [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_DB_API], [1], [Define to 1 if
> HAVE_DB_API])])
>
> # Search for asr (based on zlib checks)
> dnl asr is required
>
Thanks ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:52:31PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Just realized my reply was off-list so here it is again in case someone
> hits teh same bug:
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:43:55PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > I've hit this twice now, with smtpd ju
you fix your
certificate chain, the fatal() will go away by itself.
That being said, we should fatal() at startup and not that late, I'll be
improving that this week-end so it is part of next major release.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @p
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:10:43AM +0200, gilles chehade wrote:
> > A new opensmtpd portable snapshot is available at:
> >
> > http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-201506020910p1.tar.gz
>
fail auth.
The limitation has been lifed recently but the change touches many files
and since we're getting closer to a new major release of OpenSMTPD, it's
not going to be backported to current release.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
UCCESS AND FAILURES !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
A new opensmtpd portable snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-201506020910p1.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-201506020910p1.tar.gz) =
c2c38dcc48385d63cc0b5ecb8a53efa09c93a3b329b3d79e1baa0c2e84310d41
A summary of the content of this snapshot is ava
A new opensmtpd snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-201506020906.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-201506020906.tar.gz) =
3f0d174cde32994d0be448a9e9fd4b2f12e0c9734caad1f842a880694716f9e7
A summary of the content of this snapshot is available below.
A new opensmtpd-extras snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-extras-201506020835.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-extras-201506020835.tar.gz) =
47dfc47dd6ad56b15707dcfb592ebe04e39f107a44076e0ab969b6d940eec84e
A summary of the content of this snapsho
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 06:28:02PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On May 31, 2015 6:10 PM, "Gilles Chehade" wrote:
> >
> > What's the final decision on this ?
> >
>
> Roll with what I've put, and if there are any serious objections, someone
r autodetection, if luajit is installed on a system, it's probably been
> done so deliberately, and so should be used if available.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joerg
> >
What's the final decision on this ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
ay 29, 2015 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Thanks, I'll review and merge tomorrow !
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:59:07PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > This is https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD-extras/pull/20
> >
> > This pull reque
; openbsd-compat/openbsd-compat.h| 8 --
> openbsd-compat/util.h | 36 ++
> 13 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 openbsd-compat/util.h
>
> --
> 2.4.2
>
>
> --
> Y
to.
With upcoming snapshot you will no longer experience the error because
it either creates with proper mode or upgrades to new mode if there is
already a purge with the previous mode.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You receiv
e already linking -lresolv
but it doesn't feel right to link extras to it just for that...
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to:
A new opensmtpd-extras snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-extras-201505281056.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-extras-201505281056.tar.gz) =
47fe0c63b78e9f29f0432accf88a4fd551c20bc9e14fcf15917430a401512b15
A summary of the content of this snapsho
; +CFLAGS+=$(shell python-config --includes)
> +LDADD+= $(shell python-config --libs)
> DPADD= ${LIBPYTHON2.7}
> -LDADD+= -L/usr/local/lib -lpython2.7
> --
> 2.4.1
>
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> will apply to portable branch today thanks
>
so this diff broke build with libevent < 2, LIBEVENT_VERSION doesn't
exist in my libevent 1.4
however, the reason for this check was to conditionnally in
surely we can apply to other language bridges :-)
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:16:35PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> much much better !
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:16:58PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Python can be discovered using python-config
> > ---
> &
s_srcdir)/table-python/table_python.c
>
> -CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include/python2.7
> +CFLAGS+=$(shell python-config --includes)
> +LDADD+= $(shell python-config --libs)
> DPADD= ${LIBPYTHON2.7}
> -LDADD+= -L/usr/local/lib -lpython2.7
> --
-LDADD+= -L/usr/local/lib -lpython2.7
> +LDADD+= -L/usr/lib -lpython2.7
> --
> 2.4.1
>
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
exit(1);
>
> exit(0);
> @@ -2773,7 +2773,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> ]], [[
> - exit(strcmp(event_get_version(), _EVENT_VERSION) == 0 ? 0 : 1);
> + exit(strcmp(event_get_version(), LIBEVENT_VERSION) == 0 ? 0 : 1);
> ]])],
> [
>
A new opensmtpd portable snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-201505241924p1.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-201505241924p1.tar.gz) =
bf466974965fdedb837b63fc6572d665d6f176c415bb6dcc66808d7573da990f
A summary of the content of this snapshot is ava
A new opensmtpd snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-201505241920.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-201505241920.tar.gz) =
43acc922c7183353ff062a60adf4c51a9ae7bb32f80cbe186ca5ee2c74bf4c25
A summary of the content of this snapshot is available below.
Many of you are not OpenBSD users so I thought I'd share this mail which
was received on an OpenBSD specific mailing-list.
Note that this is a good occasion to discuss solutions ;-)
- Forwarded message from Gilles Chehade -
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 00:51:09 +0200
From: Gilles Ch
A new opensmtpd-extras snapshot is available at:
http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-extras-201505202252.tar.gz
Checksum:
SHA256 (opensmtpd-extras-201505202252.tar.gz) =
0f979b81651a2b0539b0233da127b12d907441055b5811bc45ffad22ed472053
A summary of the content of this snapsho
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:03:40PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> - master & portable branches will be merged, we will have one dev branch
> - we'll publish a branch + tarball matching current code for 5.4.x
> - we'll start publishing snapshots for OpenSMTPD-extra
or specific API versions
If you contribute to the OpenSMTPD-extras repository, please send all of
your pull requests against the portable branch since this'll become main
branch after it's been made to build on OpenBSD.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
"RCPT TO:"
May 19 08:41:20 poolp smtpd[1770]: smtp-in: session 3e1b7d69ac8b9e1b:
connection from host 20.86.132.77.rev.sfr.net [77.132.86.20] closed (session
not moving forward)
> And thanks for your great work!
>
>
NP
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:46:45PM +0530, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2015 16:13:02 +0200 (CEST), gilles chehade
> said:
> | A new opensmtpd portable snapshot is available at:
>
> | http://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-201505091607p1.tar.gz
was going to mail you this morning and ask if you were sure you didn't
run 5.4.3 as the bug you experience was fixed by Stefan Sieg and his fix
was committed over 5 months ago:
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/commit/4d8347ff92351462418cad2f67d6787aa6f137cd
So nope, the issue do
This is now fixed in git, will be part of next snapshot to be published this
week-end
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:48:47AM -0700, Seth wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 09:36:42 -0700, gilles chehade wrote:
>
> >A new opensmtpd portable snapshot is available at:
> &g
non-tls on
> certain destinations or change the fallback algorithm?
>
I'll have a look today
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
better to know its update plans to
> test it with the next major opensmtpd release.
>
I dunno
Eric has some stuff to do in libasr before making release, I do not know
what it is and when he'll find the time to do it. It'll have to be soon,
the OpenSMTPD release depends on it.
--
Gil
pendency drop is part of a separate branch that is not ready to
be merged yet.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
401 - 500 of 1023 matches
Mail list logo
