[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-11-06 Thread JonR800
That begs the question, what's required of a release manager for MK? On Oct 29, 4:23 pm, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's no need to fork the project, I would gladly hand over SVN access to someone who wants to step up as a release manager. -bob

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-11-06 Thread Bob Ippolito
A release manager would be responsible for deciding when to do releases, as well as to make sure everything is up to snuff... which would probably mean that they'd spend a lot of their time reviewing code and docs, probably fixing some of it personally (especially docs). I think we're pretty

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-29 Thread Bob Ippolito
There's no need to fork the project, I would gladly hand over SVN access to someone who wants to step up as a release manager. -bob On 10/29/07, gsteff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't use Mochikit, but like the library, and check in on the newsgroup now and then. If a lot of people want to

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-29 Thread gsteff
I don't use Mochikit, but like the library, and check in on the newsgroup now and then. If a lot of people want to see new features added to Mochikit, or at least an acknowledgement that the new features already added are stable (via a new release), the normal solution I think is for someone to

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-17 Thread Jonathan Ellis
On Oct 16, 3:20 pm, Arnar Birgisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most people are in one of two situations: 1. Already using MK. If it's working and you're happy with it, why do you need a release? If it is not, a release won't help much. That's the thing, the cutting edge is a moving target and

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-17 Thread Arnar Birgisson
On 10/17/07, Jonathan Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 16, 3:20 pm, Arnar Birgisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most people are in one of two situations: 1. Already using MK. If it's working and you're happy with it, why do you need a release? If it is not, a release won't help much.

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-16 Thread troels knak-nielsen
On 10/16/07, Daniel Fetchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Five months ago someone posted a list of blocking bugs: On May 15, 9:57 pm, sayrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://trac.mochikit.com/ticket/113 http://trac.mochikit.com/ticket/226 http://trac.mochikit.com/ticket/228

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-16 Thread Jason Bunting
On 10/16/07, troels knak-nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/16/07, Daniel Fetchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Five months ago someone posted a list of blocking bugs: On May 15, 9:57 pm, sayrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://trac.mochikit.com/ticket/113

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-16 Thread Arnar Birgisson
On 10/16/07, troels knak-nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's bordering on arrogant to assume that people who want to use MochiKit must be geeky enough to use SVN. Most javascripters aren't. I find it no less arrogant to demand that other people devote alot of their time in maintaining free