[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-11-06 Thread Bob Ippolito
A release manager would be responsible for deciding when to do releases, as well as to make sure everything is up to snuff... which would probably mean that they'd spend a lot of their time reviewing code and docs, probably fixing some of it personally (especially docs). I think we're pretty solid

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-11-06 Thread JonR800
That begs the question, what's required of a release manager for MK? On Oct 29, 4:23 pm, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's no need to fork the project, I would gladly hand over SVN > access to someone who wants to step up as a release manager. > > -bob --~--~-~--~~

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-29 Thread Bob Ippolito
There's no need to fork the project, I would gladly hand over SVN access to someone who wants to step up as a release manager. -bob On 10/29/07, gsteff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't use Mochikit, but like the library, and check in on the > newsgroup now and then. If a lot of people wan

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-29 Thread gsteff
I don't use Mochikit, but like the library, and check in on the newsgroup now and then. If a lot of people want to see new features added to Mochikit, or at least an acknowledgement that the new features already added are stable (via a new release), the normal solution I think is for someone to f

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-17 Thread Arnar Birgisson
On 10/17/07, Jonathan Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 16, 3:20 pm, "Arnar Birgisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Most people are in one of two situations: > > > > 1. Already using MK. If it's working and you're happy with it, why do > > you need a release? If it is not, a release won'

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-17 Thread Jonathan Ellis
On Oct 16, 3:20 pm, "Arnar Birgisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most people are in one of two situations: > > 1. Already using MK. If it's working and you're happy with it, why do > you need a release? If it is not, a release won't help much. That's the thing, the cutting edge is a moving targ

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-16 Thread Arnar Birgisson
On 10/16/07, troels knak-nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's bordering on arrogant to assume that people who want to > use MochiKit must be geeky enough to use SVN. Most > javascripters aren't. I find it no less arrogant to demand that other people devote alot of their time in maintaining f

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-16 Thread Jason Bunting
On 10/16/07, troels knak-nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/16/07, Daniel Fetchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Five months ago someone posted a list of blocking bugs: > > > > > > On May 15, 9:57 pm, sayrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-16 Thread troels knak-nielsen
On 10/16/07, Daniel Fetchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Five months ago someone posted a list of blocking bugs: > > > > On May 15, 9:57 pm, sayrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >

[mochikit] Re: 1.4, again

2007-10-16 Thread Daniel Fetchinson
> Five months ago someone posted a list of blocking bugs: > > On May 15, 9:57 pm, sayrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >