Ian Struble wrote:
> And just to throw one more wrench into the works. You could load up only
> the most popular data at startup and let the rest of the data get loaded
> on a cache miss.
>
> That is one technique that we have used for some customer session
> servers. It allowed each server t
; >
> >
> >
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >08/20/2002 10:54 AM
> >
> >
> > To: Tony Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, md
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >[EMAI
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:Re: Apache::Session - What goes
>in session?
>
>
>We do see some slowdown on our langauge translation db
>calls since they are so intensive. Moving to a &
at's how I
understand the theory to work anyway.
Josh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/20/2002 10:54 AM
To: Tony Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, md <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Apach
Thanks, you just saved us a ton of time.
Off to change course ;)
J
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:12:29 -0400
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>We are investigating using IPC rather then a file based
>>structure but
>>its purely investigation at this point.
>>
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are investigating using IPC rather then a file based structure but
> its purely investigation at this point.
>
> What are the speed diffs between an IPC cache and a Berkely DB cache. My
> gut instinct always screams 'Stay Off The Disk' but my gut is not always
> r
Thanks...you've given me plenty to work with. Great
explination. This is good pragmatic stuff to know!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
md wrote:
> I haven't looked at the cache modules docs yet...would
> it be possible to build cache on the separate
> load-balanced machines as we go along...as we do with
> template caching?
Of course. However, if a user is sent to a random machine each time you
won't be able to cache anything
We are investigating using IPC rather then a file based
structure but its purely investigation at this point.
What are the speed diffs between an IPC cache and a
Berkely DB cache. My gut instinct always screams 'Stay Off
The Disk' but my gut is not always right.. Ok, rarely
right.. ;)
John-
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Currently we are working on a 'per machine' cache so all
> children can benefit for each childs initial database read
> of the translated string, the differential between
> children is annoying in the 'per child cache' strategy.
Sounds like you want
We do see some slowdown on our langauge translation db
calls since they are so intensive. Moving to a 'per child'
cache for each string as it came out of the db sped page
loads up from 4.5 seconds to .6-1.0 seconds per page which
is significant.
Currently we are working on a 'per machine' cac
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 06:54:01PM -0700, md wrote:
> I can definitely get it all from the db, but that doesn't
> seem very efficient.
Don't worry about whether it *seems* efficient. Do it right, and then
worry about how to speed that up - if, and only if, it's too slow.
Premature optimisation i
IFS, or use a
> database. (There are also fancier options with
> things like Spread, but
> that's getting a little ahead of the game.) You can
> use MySQL for
> caching, and it will probably have similar
> performance to a networked
> file system. Unfortunately, the A
bably have similar performance to a networked
file system. Unfortunately, the Apache::Session code isn't all that
easy to use for this, since it assumes you want to generate IDs for the
objects you store rather than passing them in. You could adapt the code
from it to suit your needs though. The
or Cache::Mmap and take a
> look at the examples
> there. You use it in a way that's very similar to
> what you're doing
> with Apache::Session for the things you referred to
> as global. There
> are also good examples in the documentation for the
> Memoize module.
#x27;t cache
your data or the output of the templates. What you should do is grab a
module like Cache::Cache or Cache::Mmap and take a look at the examples
there. You use it in a way that's very similar to what you're doing
with Apache::Session for the things you referred to as glo
They're not the same. A session is often
> stored in a database so
> that it can be reliable. A cache is usually stored
> on the file system
> so it can be fast.
The session is stored in a database
(Apache::Session::MySQL), and I am using TT caching
for the templates, but
Thanks though. That was succinctly put.
Could you go back in time and tell me that a year or two ago?
That would be great, thanks again.
-Josh
:)
> Things like the login status of this session,
> and the user ID that is associated with it go
> in the session. Status of a particular page
>
md wrote:
> Currently I'm putting very little in the session
Good. You should put in as little as possible.
> what I am putting in the session is more "global" in
> nature...greeting, current page number, current page
> name...
That doesn't sound very global to me. What happens when users ope
Hello md --
> I'm using mod_perl and Apache::Session on an app that
> is similar to MyYahoo. I found a few bits of info from
> a previous thread, but I'm curious as to what type of
> information should go in the session and what should
> come from the database.
One thin
I'm using mod_perl and Apache::Session on an app that
is similar to MyYahoo. I found a few bits of info from
a previous thread, but I'm curious as to what type of
information should go in the session and what should
come from the database.
Currently I'm putting very little in t
hought.com> Subject: Apache::Session HELP!
Sent by: Rafiq
Wait, ignore that - I was getting my Apache::Session and my
Apache::AuthCookie signals crossed. Sorry.
-Fran
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
>
> What does your config file look like? All pointing at the right
> tables and fields and such?
>
> -Fran
>
> Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN) w
What does your config file look like? All pointing at the right tables
and fields and such?
-Fran
Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN) wrote:
>Hi, I'm in major poop.
>
>Got a presentation soon and my just implemented, implementation of
>Apache::Session is not working as per the man page.
&
Hi, I'm in major poop.
Got a presentation soon and my just implemented, implementation of
Apache::Session is not working as per the man page.
I've set commit to 1 and tied a session to a postgres database. I then
set a field and check the table it's not there.
When I later do a
Just 8 lines of glue code to use YAML as a Apache::Session
serialization handler. Any suuggestions welcome, Thanks.
The URL
http://bulknews.net/lib/archives/Apache-Session-Serialize-YAML-0.01.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/M/MI/MIYAGAWA/Apache-Session-Serialize-YAML
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Brian Parker wrote:
> > I'm trying to use Apache::Session::MySQL. Since I'm generating my own
> > session key outside of Apache::Session (using $ENV{REMOTE_USER}), what
> > method(s) do I have to override to prevent Apache::Session from
Brian Parker wrote:
> I'm trying to use Apache::Session::MySQL. Since I'm generating my own
> session key outside of Apache::Session (using $ENV{REMOTE_USER}), what
> method(s) do I have to override to prevent Apache::Session from trying
> to create a session key for me
Hi,
I would like to implement sessions using only $ENV{REMOTE_USER} as the
session key as described on page 259 (Ch. 5) of the Eagle book.
I'm trying to use Apache::Session::MySQL. Since I'm generating my own
session key outside of Apache::Session (using $ENV{REMOTE_USER}), what
meth
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 19:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Chris Winters writes:
> > Nothing special should be required -- I've done this with no problem
> > using recent versions -- 1.50+ -- of Apache::Session. The only way it
> > might be a problem is if you're tryi
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 16:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was attempting to store a blessed object via Apache::Session, but
> when the session is returned, the hash is empty. I did some google
> searching and ran across a similar question:
>
> http://www.geocrawler.com/archives
I was attempting to store a blessed object via Apache::Session, but
when the session is returned, the hash is empty. I did some google
searching and ran across a similar question:
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/182/2000/5/0/3823715/
I have not found any other information, and was
Stathy G. Touloumis wrote:
>>You need to do some more debugging. Problems with Apache::Session are
>>usually due to scoping, so put in some debug statements to see that the
>>session objects for the IDs having trouble are getting properly cleaned
>>up (i.e. DESTROY is
> You need to do some more debugging. Problems with Apache::Session are
> usually due to scoping, so put in some debug statements to see that the
> session objects for the IDs having trouble are getting properly cleaned
> up (i.e. DESTROY is getting called). It is possible to h
> You need to do some more debugging. Problems with Apache::Session are
> usually due to scoping, so put in some debug statements to see that the
> session objects for the IDs having trouble are getting properly cleaned
> up (i.e. DESTROY is getting called). It is possible to h
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, F. Xavier Noria wrote:
> 3. Could one set up things in a way that allows the database to see
>the timestamps and program a trigger to delete old sessions? Or
>is there a standard idiom for doing this in a different way?
>
thats what i usually do ..
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 01:11:59 +0200
"F.Xavier Noria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: If I understand it correctly, Apache::Session::Oracle uses a table
: called "sessions" with at least two columns, one called "id", of type
: "varchar2(32)", and anot
If I understand it correctly, Apache::Session::Oracle uses a table
called "sessions" with at least two columns, one called "id", of type
"varchar2(32)", and another called "a_session", of type "long".
Say I want to store a pair of things in sess
d one set up things in a way that allows the database to
see
>the timestamps and program a trigger to delete old sessions?
Yes. You will have to hack the Apache::Session code to do it, but it's
not very hard. Just make it store a timestamp in a different table. Or
put a trigg
If I understand it correctly, Apache::Session::Oracle uses a table
called "sessions" with at least two columns, one called "id", of type
"varchar2(32)", and another called "a_session", of type "long".
Say I want to store a pair of things in sess
If I understand it correctly, Apache::Session::Oracle uses a table
called "sessions" with at least two columns, one called "id", of type
"varchar2(32)", and another called "a_session", of type "long".
Say I want to store a pair of things in sess
Sorry if this is already known, or if I'm posting to the wrong
people, (I'm new to the mod_perl world), but :
Looks like there's a minor bug in Apache::Session::Lock::File::clean().
Patch : (against version 1.01, in distribution Apache-Session-1.54)
(also adding proper local()iza
I have Apache::Session::Oracle running. It creates the session fine, but
after accessing the page successfully a few times, the script gets held
up waiting for a lock to release and page never loads until I restart
Apache. Here is the sample code I am using. Is there something I need to
do with
I once did a one-off mod of Apache::Session to do just
this but eventually gave up and just changed my table
names. It was to hard to keep in sync with new releases of
Apache::Session and I don't have enough faith in my
ability to send a real patch :)
So I think its a natural path. Whe
I'm wanting to use it to track sessions and contexts -- sessions can
own multiple contexts and contexts can pass from session to session.
Basically break identity apart from process. Apache::Session would
be ideal for both since the storage mechanisms are identical.
Unfortunately, the table name i
Has anyone ever thought to have the table name modifiable? E.g. instead of
'sessions', you could set it to something like 'preferences' for a given
instance. I wanted to maintain session information, but also preferences
that are attached to a given username. I could just put the two within the
Hi Jeffrey,
I've found a bug in clean method of Apache::Session::Lock::File when check
lockfiles last access time.
In effects the result of expression:
(stat($dir.'/'.$file))[8] - $now
is always negative and lock dir cleanup isn't done.
The patch simply inv
) I get a 'false' value returned which
I cannot figure out why.
> > Has anyone ran into issues with data being written to the data
> source using
> > Apache::Session::Store::DB_File and Apache::Session::Lock::File? We are
> > running into a unique instance where
Announcing the update of PHP::Session and yet another module of nightmare.
You can download 'em from http://bulknews.net/lib/archives/ and CPAN.
NAME
Apache::Session::PHP - glues Apache::Session with PHP::Session
SYNOPSIS
use Apache::Session::PHP;
tie %session, &#
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 15:44, Stathy G. Touloumis wrote:
> Has anyone ran into issues with data being written to the data source using
> Apache::Session::Store::DB_File and Apache::Session::Lock::File? We are
> running into a unique instance where a value is not being saved to the
> s
Has anyone ran into issues with data being written to the data source using
Apache::Session::Store::DB_File and Apache::Session::Lock::File? We are
running into a unique instance where a value is not being saved to the
session store at a certain point through a workflow. There are multiple
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:08:10PM -0800, Brian Lavender wrote:
> I am trying to test the Apache::Session::Oracle
>
> Here is the error I am getting. What is wrong? I was able to
> successfully install and test Apache::Session which tested
> Apache::Session::Oracle
>
&
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:08:10PM -0800, Brian Lavender wrote:
> I am trying to test the Apache::Session::Oracle
>
> Here is the error I am getting. What is wrong? I was able to
> successfully install and test Apache::Session which tested
> Apache::Session::Oracle
>
&
I am trying to test the Apache::Session::Oracle
Here is the error I am getting. What is wrong? I was able to
successfully install and test Apache::Session which tested
Apache::Session::Oracle
This is the error.
[Mon Mar 11 14:01:23 2002] [error] Can't locate object method "TI
t;
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:33:17PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > Brian Lavender wrote:
> > >
> > > I am trying to install Apache::Session and it is failing on
> > > the DBD::Oracle tests. It is asking for a default user. Do
> > > I need to con
er wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to install Apache::Session and it is failing on
> > the DBD::Oracle tests. It is asking for a default user. Do
> > I need to configure Oracle for a default user? Or do I need
> > to set some environment variable with a user id and password?
>
>
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Brian Lavender wrote:
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:24:35 -0800
> From: Brian Lavender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Apache::Session problem with DBD::Oracle
>
> I am trying to install Apache::Session and it is failing on
> t
Brian Lavender wrote:
>
> I am trying to install Apache::Session and it is failing on
> the DBD::Oracle tests. It is asking for a default user. Do
> I need to configure Oracle for a default user? Or do I need
> to set some environment variable with a user id and password?
wel
I am trying to install Apache::Session and it is failing on
the DBD::Oracle tests. It is asking for a default user. Do
I need to configure Oracle for a default user? Or do I need
to set some environment variable with a user id and password?
brian
Here are the errors I am getting:
t/99oracle
ble.pm (autosplit
>> into blib/lib/auto/Storable/thaw.al) line 351, at
>> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.p
>> m line 27
CW> This sounds like someone with a more recent version of Storable
CW> in their private lib
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 06:16, Domien Bakker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to use Apache::Session to store http session information.
> The version number of Apache::Session is 1.54. It is running on
> Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) mod_perl/1.26 configured.
> ...
> Both methods reso
Title: Apache::Session problems
Hello,
I am trying to use Apache::Session to store http session information.
The version number of Apache::Session is 1.54. It is running on Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) mod_perl/1.26 configured.
I am using the TicketTool from the o'reilly book, I make a t
As an add-on to this, does anyone know if one could use MySQL HEAP
(memory resident) tables for the session table?
--Jon Robison
Rob Bloodgood wrote:
>
> > I am using Apache::Session with Postgresql. Unfortunately I had
> > never worked with a huge amount of data before I sta
> I am using Apache::Session with Postgresql. Unfortunately I had
> never worked with a huge amount of data before I started to program
> something like a (little) web application. I happily packed
> everything in the "session"(s-table) that might be of any use. It
> hi
tie/un-tie the hash.
I found it helpful to take apart the various Apache::Session modules and see
what makes them tick.
--
Milo Hyson
CyberLife Labs, LLC
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 02:43, Christoph Lange wrote:
> Hi Milo,
>
> thanks for your answer. I hope you will excuse, but I am not sure
> whether I got you right.
> > The session hash is serialized/deserialized in its entirety using the
> > Storable module.
> Does this mean, that - after tying the s
Hi Milo,
thanks for your answer. I hope you will excuse, but I am not sure
whether I got you right.
> The session hash is serialized/deserialized in its entirety using the
> Storable module.
Does this mean, that - after tying the session hash - it is of no importance
(concerning the amount of tim
On Saturday 23 February 2002 03:03 pm, Christoph Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess that this is going to be another "what-a-bloody-beginner"-question
> but I hope somebody will be in a good mood and help me out.
>
> I am using Apache::Session with Postgresql. Unfortunate
Hi,
I guess that this is going to be another
"what-a-bloody-beginner"-question
but I hope somebody will be in a good mood and help
me out.
I am using Apache::Session with Postgresql.
Unfortunately I had never worked with a huge
amount of data
before I started to program some
I've been told this is the place to send questions related to apache perl
modules.
I believe I have discovered a locking bug in Apache::Session::File.
The following code should retrieve an existing session from the file system
and place an exclusive lock on the session file:
my $locking
> I register a clean up handler to explicitly untie the session variable.
I have found that it's safer to put things in pnotes than to use globals and
cleanup handlers. We used a lot of cleanup handlers at eToys to clear
globals holding various request-specific things, and we started getting
unp
ns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: Apache::Session getting DESTROYed in wrong order
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 12:44 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> >> In a Mason context, which is where I'
t; # 'local' so it's available to lower-level components
>> local *session;
>>
>> my $dbh = &::get_dbh;
>> my $session_id = &::get_cookie('_session_id');
>> tie %session, 'Apache::Session::MySQL', $session_id,
>>
session;
>
> my $dbh = &::get_dbh;
> my $session_id = &::get_cookie('_session_id');
> tie %session, 'Apache::Session::MySQL', $session_id,
>{Handle => $dbh, LockHandle => $dbh};
> ...
>
Geez, that's awfully confusing to
On Friday, January 4, 2002, at 02:22 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
> For the sake of thread completion, here's a script which demonstrates
> the bug. It turns out to be a Perl bug (5.6.1, at least), not an
> Apache::Session bug. I'll post to p5p after I post here.
I was su
>
> sub X::TIEHASH{bless{}}
> { local %x; tie %x, "X" } print tied %x ? "a" : "b";
>
> 5.004_03 prints "b", and 5.004_04 (and higher) prints "a". I think "b"
> is the proper behavior, at least that's my op
On Friday, January 4, 2002, at 02:48 AM, Gerald Richter wrote:
>># Won't get cleaned up properly
>>local %foo;
>>tie %foo, 'Dummy', name => '%foo';
>
> local only make a copy of the original value and restores it at the end
> of
> the scope, so %foo will not destroyed, but restored
># Won't get cleaned up properly
>local %foo;
>tie %foo, 'Dummy', name => '%foo';
local only make a copy of the original value and restores it at the end of
the scope, so %foo will not destroyed, but restored at the end of the scope.
I guess this is the reason my it still stays tied.
Hey,
For the sake of thread completion, here's a script which demonstrates
the bug. It turns out to be a Perl bug (5.6.1, at least), not an
Apache::Session bug. I'll post to p5p after I post here.
Note that $foo and %bar are cleaned up by refcount, but %foo isn't
cleaned
On Thursday, January 3, 2002, at 02:02 PM, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> This seems like a really weird problem. The Store module is destroyed
> while another module still has a reference to it. Unfortunately for you
> and I, the only conclusion I have been able to draw is that Perl's
> DESTROY
>
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm having problems with Apache::Session, the symptom is that none of my
> data is getting written to the database. It's not the nested-data
> problem, since I'm not using any nested data structures.
>
> The circular reference was the only way I could think of to force an
> object to be destroyed during global destruction.
What happens if you use a global?
> Hmm, that may be - Mason does create more closures now than it used to.
> It seems like only 'named' closures would create this problem,
On Thursday, January 3, 2002, at 11:57 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> I don't have a test case involving Apache::Session yet (I've been out
>> of
>> town for a couple days), but here's a simple one in Perl that
>> demonstrates the DESTROY order problem:
&g
> I don't have a test case involving Apache::Session yet (I've been out of
> town for a couple days), but here's a simple one in Perl that
> demonstrates the DESTROY order problem:
That's sort of a weird example, since it has a circular reference. Does it
have prob
Hi Aaron,
I don't have a test case involving Apache::Session yet (I've been out of
town for a couple days), but here's a simple one in Perl that
demonstrates the DESTROY order problem:
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
{
packag
Hi Ken,
> refcount destruction. I've declared %session as a locally-scoped
> variable, so it should evaporate before global destruction, unless it's
> got circular data structures or something. Anyone know what might be
> going on?
Do you have a simple case we can test yet?
Aaron
Hey,
I'm having problems with Apache::Session, the symptom is that none of my
data is getting written to the database. It's not the nested-data
problem, since I'm not using any nested data structures.
After some investigation, I've discovered that the
Apache::Session::S
n other frames
send their requests.
- Not using the locking API correctly. You didn't post any code, but
the locking options for Apache::Session sometimes trip people up and you
may have had a misconfiguration of some kind.
Anyway, there's nothing wrong with writing directly to the
Just to let anyone who was wondering (and for the benefit of the archives),
I ended up ditching sessions all together. Instead, I'm using
Apache::AuthDBI to do authentication, and am making calls directly to my
database server to maintain state. Its not the most pleasant way of
maintaining state
I have been beating my head against this problem for days, to no avail.
I have tried google searches, etc., still no dice. So, I apologize for
the noise people.
I'm using Apache::Session and cookies to perform session management. In
watching the debug messages in my error_log, I ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache::Session and frames
At 3:06 PM -0800 12/5/01, Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
>I have been beating my head against this problem for days, to no
>avail. I have tried google searches, etc., still no dice. So, I
>apologize for the noise people.
>
>
Hi Michael -
> I'm using Apache::Session and cookies to perform session management. In
> watching the debug messages in my error_log, I can see that the cookie
> is created, the session is created, and all subsequent calls correctly
> loads the session. However, part of
At 3:06 PM -0800 12/5/01, Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
>I have been beating my head against this problem for days, to no
>avail. I have tried google searches, etc., still no dice. So, I
>apologize for the noise people.
>
>I'm using Apache::Session and cookies to perform sess
own frames, and each attempts
to load the session. Occasionally, one of them successfully loads the
original session, but the other two end up creating their own sessions.
When I call:
tie %session, 'Apache::Session::Flex', $id, \%options;
it doesn't return anything in $@, excep
I have been beating my head against this problem for days, to no avail.
I have tried google searches, etc., still no dice. So, I apologize for
the noise people.
I'm using Apache::Session and cookies to perform session management. In
watching the debug messages in my error_log, I ca
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
> My code now includes:
>
> 35: # Session handler...
> 36: my %session; undef my $session_id;
> 37: use Apache::Session::MySQL;
> 38: tie %session, 'Apache::Session::MySQL', $session_id,
> 39: { DataSource =&
istribution there. This accompanies the book
for which the aforementioned URL is the home site. Said
book has a chapter on sessions focusing on Apache::Session,
so you may find the example scripts useful for helping
you solve your problem.
>
>My code now includes:
>
>35: # Session handl
Thank you everyone for the quality of help I've so far received and your
rapid responses. However... :-(
My code now includes:
35: # Session handler...
36: my %session; undef my $session_id;
37: use Apache::Session::MySQL;
38: tie %session, 'Apache::Session::MySQL',
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:23:33 -
"Jonathan M. Hollin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 42: tie %session, 'Apache::Session::DBI',
> 43: {DataSource => "dbi:$db_driver:sessions:$db_address"};
put $sid (session id: undef for fresh) after 'Apach
> I changed "Apache::Session::DBI" to "Apache::Session::MySQL" and tried
> again.
What's the version number of your Apache::Session? It should be 1.54.
> 42: tie %session, 'Apache::Session::DBI',
> 43: {DataSource => "dbi:$db_driver:se
101 - 200 of 571 matches
Mail list logo
