Re: BOF?

On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > > Sunday evening where? > > sounds like the hotel bar is the only real option. i'll be > there 8.30-9pm i guess. my flight arrives at 10:15 so i'll drop by the bar at 11:30 or so. -jwb

Re: BOF?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moseley) wrote: >On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > >> Sunday evening where? > >sounds like the hotel bar is the only real option. i'll be >there 8.30-9pm i guess. Since it seems like Sunday night is the overwhelming favorite, I'll just have to meet up with

Re: BOF?

On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > Sunday evening where? sounds like the hotel bar is the only real option. i'll be there 8.30-9pm i guess.

Re: BOF?

On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: [...] > I'm sure SD hasn't got anything nearly as classy as the Eagle and Anchor > or whatever the place in Monterey was. The sign said "Crown & Anchor". :-) http://photo.tomat.dk/tpc4/dsc_4696.jpg http://photo.tomat.dk/tpc4/dsc_4696.html To whoever

Re: BOF?

On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote: > > I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at > > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . > > Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together. > > speaking of which. there should

Re: BOF?

gt; > >> > > >> > I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at > > >> > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . > > >> > Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together. > > >> > &

Re: BOF?

I'm pretty easy to tag out of a croud, I'm pretty sure I'm starting the week with pink hair again (I'm gonna end it with blue or green). I'm getting there sunday around 5ish. Scott On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2001 07:10, James G Smith wrote: > > >Judging by wh

Re: BOF?

On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Eric Cholet wrote: > > > --On 16/07/01 16:48 +0200 Robin Berjon wrote: > > > > > I arrive on Sunday evening too, is there a good way to recognize a bunch > > > of modperlians ? I've only ever seen two people on this list so if they

RE: BOF?

> -Original Message- > From: Gunther Birznieks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:54 AM > To: Geoffrey Young; 'Ken Williams '; 'modperl ' > Subject: RE: BOF? [snip] > > If you like, I guess I could try organizing to ge

Re: BOF?

gt; > >> > > >> > I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at > > >> > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . > > >> > Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together. > > >> > &

Re: BOF?

At 12:10 AM 7/16/2001 -0500, James G Smith wrote: >Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote: > >> > >> > I just noticed that there's no mod_perl

RE: BOF?

At 01:19 PM 7/14/2001 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: Ken Williams > >To: modperl > >Sent: 7/14/01 11:48 AM > >Subject: BOF? > > > >Yo, > > > >I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed

Re: BOF?

On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Eric Cholet wrote: > --On 16/07/01 16:48 +0200 Robin Berjon wrote: > > > I arrive on Sunday evening too, is there a good way to recognize a bunch > > of modperlians ? I've only ever seen two people on this list so if they > > aren't there I won't recognize anyone :) > > don

Re: BOF?

--On 16/07/01 16:48 +0200 Robin Berjon wrote: > I arrive on Sunday evening too, is there a good way to recognize a bunch > of modperlians ? I've only ever seen two people on this list so if they > aren't there I won't recognize anyone :) don't worry, both these people will be there ;) -- Eric

RE: BOF?

my Outlook 2000 Wired Deskheld (www.microsoft.com) > -Original Message- > From: Robin Berjon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: BOF? > > > On Monday 16 July 2001 07:10, James G Smith wrote: >

Re: BOF?

On Monday 16 July 2001 07:10, James G Smith wrote: > >Judging by where the hotel is, I think probably the hotel bar is going to > >be best. I arrive on Sunday. > > As do I. Just let me know where and when. I arrive on Sunday evening too, is there a good way to recognize a bunch of modperlians ?

Re: BOF?

Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote: > >> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote: >> >> > I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at >> > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pu

Re: BOF?

On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote: > > > I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at > > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . > > Is one scheduled? If not, let's get o

Re: BOF?

On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote: > > > I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at > > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . > > Is one scheduled? If not, let's get o

Re: BOF?

- brian moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/14/01 10:43:42 -0700: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote: > >> I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at >> http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . >> Is one schedul

Re: BOF?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moseley) wrote: >On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Richard Dice wrote: > >> Which opening night would that be? I'm not getting in >> until Tuesday noon. At the same time, I'm recovering at >> the moment from last night's "piss-up"... I don't think >> I'll need a repeat anytime soon.

Re: BOF?

> umm, the night before the first day of tutorials. i'm sure > people will be getting together every night. but it was > pretty cool last year for all the mp folks to show up at one > place that first night. I was by no means suggesting holding anything up for the benefit of my schedule. By all

Re: BOF?

On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Richard Dice wrote: > Which opening night would that be? I'm not getting in > until Tuesday noon. At the same time, I'm recovering at > the moment from last night's "piss-up"... I don't think > I'll need a repeat anytime soon. Still, I'm sure the > company would be fun. :-)

Re: BOF?

> speaking of which. there should be an opening night piss-up, > eh? somebody that knows the area should propose a place. Which opening night would that be? I'm not getting in until Tuesday noon. At the same time, I'm recovering at the moment from last night's "piss-up"... I don't think I'll nee

Re: BOF?

On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote: > I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . > Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together. speaking of which. there should be an opening night piss-up

RE: BOF?

>-Original Message- >From: Ken Williams >To: modperl >Sent: 7/14/01 11:48 AM >Subject: BOF? > >Yo, > >I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . >Is one scheduled? If n

BOF?

Yo, I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html . Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together. ------ Ken Williams

Re: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts

go into the > design. > > > > Jimi > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Gunther Birznieks > > To: mod_perl list > > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 10:17 AM > > Subject: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts > > > >

Re: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts

; Jimi > > - Original Message - > From: Gunther Birznieks > To: mod_perl list > Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 10:17 AM > Subject: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts > > A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl BOF. > &g

Re: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts

2001 10:17 AM Subject: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl BOF.One group of people did volunteer to do the design and posted interest on here. So if they are still up for it, it would be awesome to start discussing

Re: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts

>>>>> "Gunther" == Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gunther> A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl BOF. Gunther> One group of people did volunteer to do the design and posted interest Gunther> on here. So if they are still

mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts

A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl BOF. One group of people did volunteer to do the design and posted interest on here. So if they are still up for it, it would be awesome to start discussing ideas/proof of concept. However, before such a thing can be discussed

Re: Fw: Fw: Fw: OReilly Mod_Perl BoF TShirts

At 09:19 PM 5/15/01 -0500, Jimi Thompson wrote: >From: Gunther Birznieks >To: Jimi Thompson > >No, we don't have a design yet as far I know. I am not really organizing >it. I just thought I would post quickly to see what ideas people pop up >bec

Fw: Fw: Fw: OReilly Mod_Perl BoF TShirts

exchange.   Jimi - Original Message - From: Gunther Birznieks To: Jimi Thompson Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 9:27 AM Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: OReilly Mod_Perl BoF TShirts No, we don't have a design yet as far I know. I am not really organizing it. I just thought I would post quickly to

OReilly Mod_Perl BoF TShirts

OK, so there are a lot of mod_perl talks this time..(YAY!) But what about the BoF. Will anyone be sponsoring a T-Shirt and/or design this time around? I figured I would ask because I know we ended up talking about this like a week before ApacheCon/Santa Clara and it seemed like it was too

mod_perl BOF

hi all... over a few beers last night, we (anyone who was drinking:) decided that tonight would be a better time for the BOF than 9am this morning (or any morning for that matter) seeing as how we don't have a room though, I thought that the pool was as good a place to meet as any

Re: FW: Changes to BOF schedule..!

I just got into the Westin. If anyone else is around, I'd be into meeting for drinks or late dinner. John [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: Changes to BOF schedule..!

FYI... > -Original Message- > From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:59 PM > To: BOF submitters > Subject: Re: Changes to BOF schedule..! > > > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > > > Due to a bit of c

RE: Changes to BOF schedule..!

hi ken... the mod_perl BOF (BOF09) should not go up against any mod_perl session if it can be avoided as it stands now, this means it could fit in late afternoon/evening on thursday, nearly any time on friday, or wherever you decide it should go after the rearrangement... thanks for

Re: mod_perl BOF

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Which hotel? The Westin Santa Clara - where the conf is being held. > > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:55:35PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > > > speaking of which, is there a meeting place for tue

Re: mod_perl BOF

Which hotel? On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:55:35PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > speaking of which, is there a meeting place for tuesday night? > > That's a no-brainer. The hotel bar! > > (I'm not really obsessed with beer, honest guvnor) > > --

Re: mod_perl BOF

> "Pierre" == Pierre Phaneuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Pierre> Stas Bekman wrote: >> Last week I was presenting mod_perl at the Linux World Show in Singapore >> and we had a really nice social event with a babe belly dancer... hey, >> Gunther was dancing with her... just look at his happy f

Re: mod_perl BOF

Stas Bekman wrote: > Last week I was presenting mod_perl at the Linux World Show in Singapore > and we had a really nice social event with a babe belly dancer... hey, > Gunther was dancing with her... just look at his happy face :) Man, when I see stuff like that, I know I'm in the right busines

Re: mod_perl BOF

rocket science here. > > I'm creating my own "Beer BOF", every night in the hotel bar. You and Stas > (and any other non-drinkers) are welcome, of course :-) Only if you bring some fresh cranberry juice and a belly dancer. Yes, the belly dancer! Last week I was presenting

RE: mod_perl BOF

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > speaking of which, is there a meeting place for tuesday night? That's a no-brainer. The hotel bar! (I'm not really obsessed with beer, honest guvnor) -- /||** Founder and CTO ** ** http://axkit.com/ ** //||** AxKit.com Ltd

RE: mod_perl BOF

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 1:41 AM > To: Dave Rolsky > Cc: mod_perl list > Subject: Re: mod_perl BOF > > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > > Why was this sc

Re: mod_perl BOF

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote: > Why was this scheduled during Matt Sergeant's AxKit presentation? > > Why not during a time slot when there are no mod_perl presentations? > > This is not rocket science here. I'm creating my own "Beer BOF", every n

RE: mod_perl BOF

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > Absolutely. I've CC'd the ApacheCon planners so hopefully they can step in > and fix things. Doh, I should've done this in the first place. I ended up mailing Stewart Quealy separately. Sorry for everyone who's seeing this multiple times. -dave

RE: mod_perl BOF

>-Original Message- >From: Dave Rolsky >To: mod_perl list >Sent: 3/28/01 6:08 PM >Subject: mod_perl BOF > >Why was this scheduled during Matt Sergeant's AxKit presentation? I dunno. Stas asked me to reserve a slot for it. I didn't specify a time so this

mod_perl BOF

Why was this scheduled during Matt Sergeant's AxKit presentation? Why not during a time slot when there are no mod_perl presentations? This is not rocket science here. -dave /*== www.urth.org We await the New Sun ==*/

RE: [Very OT] ApacheCon BOF

--- julie wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Why hasn't anyone made tanktops for the ladies? T-tops! woo-hoo! Actually, I really do think it's a great idea. =o) __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://persona

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:17 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: 'darren chamberlain'

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:17 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: 'darren chamberlain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF > > > >&

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> "Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Might this be a good time to consider Cafe Press, then? Geoffrey> as it turns out, the graphics house was actually the sponsor Geoffrey> them bailing means that we don't even get a design... If it's designs you want, I could pro

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

At 08:29 28/03/2001 -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: >> From: darren chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Might this be a good time to consider Cafe Press, then? > >as it turns out, the graphics house was actually the sponsor >them bailing means that we don't even get a design... But if there _w

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> -Original Message- > From: darren chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF > > > Geoffrey Young ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this > effect on

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Geoffrey Young ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 03/28/2001: > well, I am embarrassed to have to say that the sponsor who had committed to > the shirts this year bailed on us. > > it has nothing to do with the contents of this thread - apparently the > product they wanted to ma

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

well, I am embarrassed to have to say that the sponsor who had committed to the shirts this year bailed on us. it has nothing to do with the contents of this thread - apparently the product they wanted to market isn't fully baked yet and they thought that the shirts were premature (and too costly

(new idea) RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

How about a picture of a card game; on the table are a 9 of diamonds, Jack of Clubs, and King of spades. The dealer is about to play the Ace of perl. The caption reads, "mod_perl does the trick". Also in the dealer's hand are cards that say, IIS iPlanet Servertec

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> "Tim" == Tim Sweetman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tim> (But Trademark Difficulties(tm) probably take out this idea; there are Tim> better legal fights to be had). But in the US, we have safe harbor because of the 2 live crew supreme court case. This is a parody, remember!? Of course, you

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Jonathan Gardner wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > So apart from the Native American thread which I believe everyone has > > worked out... > > > > what do you want to do about T-Shirts? > > > > For me, three ideas stand out... > > 1) I did like the ModDonalds idea... >

Re: Fw: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

On 22 Mar 2001 11:42:26 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > But mod_perl is not just Linux. mod_perl runs just fine on those > redmond-based so-called "operating systems", as well as BSD (little > devil, anyone?) and Unix, and starting saturday, MacOS X! > I was thinking abou

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > So apart from the Native American thread which I believe everyone has > worked out... > > what do you want to do about T-Shirts? > > For me, three ideas stand out... > 1) I did like the ModDonalds idea... > What about this? (this would have to a

Re: Fw: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> S&M is certainly a meme that precious few other programming languages > have made use of ... http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/bondage-and-discipline-language.html Well, close... Cheers, Richard -- Rich

Re: Fw: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Blue Lang wrote: > I'd like to officially vote for Maude Pearl, the 1920's Bettie Paige-ish > dominatrix-esque mod_perl mascot. Wow. I've had "perl6 themes" as a background process for a while now. S&M is certainly a meme that precious few other programming languages have made use of ... The

Re: Fw: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

I'd like to officially vote for Maude Pearl, the 1920's Bettie Paige-ish dominatrix-esque mod_perl mascot. Put a woman in black fishnets on a t-shirt with the word 'perl' on it and you won't be able to fit enough of them into the convention to meet the demand. :) -- Blue Lang

Re: Fw: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> "Bakki" == Bakki Kudva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bakki> It is Tux the Linux Penguin acting like that character from the Bakki> movie "the Predator" with a Gatling gun strapped across his Bakki> chest with perl bullets (on the ammo belt and shooting out of Bakki> the muzzle) and when they

Fw: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

irznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF First I vote for Randal's ModDonald's idea. Secondly I had an idea and here is crude representation of it. It is Tux the Linux Penguin acting like that character from the movie "the Predator" with a Gatling gun s

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

So apart from the Native American thread which I believe everyone has worked out... what do you want to do about T-Shirts? For me, three ideas stand out... 1) I did like the ModDonalds idea... 2) I wasn't at last years conference, I really like the World Domination one and wished I could have

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

I am so sorry to have to add one more comment to this thread but I am afraid that I am being misquoted. The quotation below IS NOT MINE though it appears that way by incomplete quoting to someone who didn't get my original post! Again, it came from Sherman Alexie a Coeur d'Alen Indian who wrote t

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexander Farber (EED)) wrote: >Bakki Kudva wrote: >> Just look at the sports teams. You couldn't have a team called the >> Washington Kikes or the Washington Micks. But yet you can have the >> Washington Redskins and this Indian with a big nose and big lips running >> around. H

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Hey! I really like the "camel ramming up stuff up Bill Gates ass" one! Can we go with that? No? Crap! -Original Message- From: pp [mailto:pp]On Behalf Of Pierre Phaneuf Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:52 AM To: mod_perl list Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF Steve Repp

Re: [Very OT] Politically Correct-ness (was: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF)

On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Jim Winstead wrote: > another note to throw out there -- o'reilly claims trademarks on > the camel/perl association and the mod_perl/eagle association, > so someone will either need to get permission from them to print a > shirt perpetuating those associations, or come up wit

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Bakki Kudva wrote: > Just look at the sports teams. You couldn't have a team called the > Washington Kikes or the Washington Micks. But yet you can have the > Washington Redskins and this Indian with a big nose and big lips running > around. How would you feel if it was the Washington Rabbis and y

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Steve Reppucci wrote: > Some folks spend way too much time looking for something to be offended > by, again IMHO. I'm pretty sure that for any thing you might find, I would be able to find someone offended by it. Let's no do anything too obvious (a camel ramming up stuff up Bill Gates ass would

Re: [Very OT] Politically Correct-ness (was: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF)

On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 08:14:53AM -0800, Paul wrote: > --- Nick Tonkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Personally I find the very name Apache a little uncomfortabl. I get > > the joke about it being a patchy server (although now the ratio of > > original NCSA code to `new' code is so miniscule as

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

[extensive snippage] How about a bunch of white shirts? One magic marker per shirt and everyone can draw their own picture of a computer. alternatively, "No-one could decide on an image so all we got was this lousy sentence." Dave

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

On 21 Mar 2001, Piers Cawley wrote: > You mean apart from the trademark infringement? I know, what about > "mod_perl is my bNO CARRIER All your base are belong to mod_perl ?? MBM -- Matthew Byng-Maddick Home: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +44 20 8980 5714 (Home) http://colondot.net/ Work: <[EMA

[Very OT] Politically Correct-ness (was: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF)

--- Nick Tonkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote: > . . . > > I for one would appreciate a design that doesn't fetishize a > > culture and people that have already had enough abuse at the hands > > of 'American' people. > > Hear, hear. > > Personally I find th

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

--- Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > actually, we may have a winner with the Native American and lamp > idea. A coworker suggested a peace pipe (picture an indian smoking > perl) instead of a lamp, since you don't see warriors holding lamps > often. maybe some smoke signals? Though

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

I realize that the subject is OT, but let's not get into a political (or whatever) debate on the list. there will be no images of anything picking on any particular demographic (be it Python or Native Americans) so please take this discussion offline... I am sorry this turned into something appr

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Well, I've been resisting any replies here, especially since I've *never* been accused of being "politically correct", but since we're tossing in pennies, here are my two: I agree that the use of *any* symbols of a race or religion to represent a sports team (or anything else of that ilk) is at

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) writes: > > "Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't > >> > tongue-in-cheek, > >> > >> lol! Why, I thought that was the idea!!! > > Geoffrey> well, of course - but much folly

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:11:13 -0500 Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > actually, we may have a winner with the Native American and lamp idea. > A > coworker suggested a peace pipe (picture an indian smoking perl) instead > of > a lamp, since you don't see warriors holding lamps often. m

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> Randal> 42 billion has the right sound to it. It's "the answer", after all, > Randal> a billion times over. :) > > I like it! Maybe a big round pearl with a smiley-face > and a headband with feather sticking up in the back > with the words "Don't Panic" in large friendly letters > printed below

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Nick Tonkin wrote: > Personally I find the very name Apache a little uncomfortable.. > ... but the relevance of an http server to the Apache nation > escapes me (and the symbolizing of the Apache nation with a feather > strikes me as stereotypical at best). Most of you will have seen, at least in

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Drew Taylor wrote: > snip.. > won't be there this year. Speaking of which, will the mod_perl classes have > the handouts available over the web? > i know doug's been updating his: http://perl.apache.org/~dougm/modperl_2.0.html sterling

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF shirts

> "Dave" == Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dave> So as not to be a total spoilsport, I would like to point out that I Dave> thought Randal's idea (Mcmod_perl?) was rather clever and I think it'd be Dave> cool (though I don't know if there are trademark issues). Remember. It's a Par

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> -Original Message- > From: Dave Rolsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:19 PM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF > > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > &g

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> "Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Geoffrey> sorry Randal - I guess I just found it so funny that I Geoffrey> didn't think you were really serious about it (I saw the big Geoffrey> glowing M and nearly snarfed my coffee :) As a professional comedian, I *demand* that m

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > If you get a really good artist, put the lamp/bottle into the hands of > > a well-built Native American figure (a warrior-type is great, but an > > "indian princess" has subliminal appealok, ok, but think about it, > > lol!) > > I think the graph

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:59 PM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF > > > >>>&g

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > > If you get a really good artist, put the lamp/bottle into the hands of > > > a well-built Native American figure (a warrior-type is great, but an > > > "indian princess" has subliminal appealok, ok,

[OT] ApacheCon BOF shirts

So as not to be a total spoilsport, I would like to point out that I thought Randal's idea (Mcmod_perl?) was rather clever and I think it'd be cool (though I don't know if there are trademark issues). -dave /*== www.urth.org We await the New Sun ==*/

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> "Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't tongue-in-cheek, >> >> lol! Why, I thought that was the idea!!! Geoffrey> well, of course - but much folly leaves the list innundated with (albeit Geoffrey> funny) postings bu

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Randal> 42 billion has the right sound to it. It's "the answer", after all, Randal> a billion times over. :) I like it! Maybe a big round pearl with a smiley-face and a headband with feather sticking up in the back with the words "Don't Panic" in large friendly letters printed below :)

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> -Original Message- > From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:58 PM > To: Geoffrey Young > Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF > > > > --- Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > still need more suggestions

Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

Hi ( 01.03.20 10:36 -0500 ) Geoffrey Young: > still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't tongue-in-cheek, > though :) But those are the best ones! And puns and other word play are a part of perl culture! Also, just for my information, who decides on the theme and how do they do it? --

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> It would also be easy enough to upload the artwork from last year. I'd use the same artwork, but change mod_perl to mod_perl 2.0. Alas, with all the latest development Doug has done for mod_perl 2.0, it seems that the release of Apache 2.0 will be the main show stopper. So let's keep the folks

RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF

> -Original Message- > From: David Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:24 AM > To: Geoffrey Young; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF > > > > Geoffrey Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > o

  1   2   >