On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:25:16AM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
It's trying to read MT/options. Since anything in this file can be put
on the command line (so it's not critical to be able to read this),
here's a patch to turn this into a warning. If there are no
objections, I'll merge it
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:27:49PM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
Hmm. Looking at common tools (like ls, chmod or whatever), restriction
to pwd is the default, and recursiveness must explicitly be requested,
like per '-R' option (OK, not possible with ls, of course). 'find' is
one of the notable
On 5/7/05, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:25:16AM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
It's trying to read MT/options. Since anything in this file can be put
on the command line (so it's not critical to be able to read this),
here's a patch to turn this into
Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It actually had never occurred to me that one might expect giving a
directory to mean only the first level of stuff in that directory;
maybe we need a straw poll on what people's intuitions here are?
Who ever called 'ls' with a directory name as param
Bruno Hertz wrote:
Who ever called 'ls' with a directory name as param might think
different. Shell expansion is non recursive either. Actually, most
commands work non recursive without explicit request. Take rm -rf as
another example.
conversely, cvs diff dir etc. do act recursively, iirc,
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Hardest part is coming up with a sensible way for the user to express
this desire -- any suggestions?
off the top of my head --local (a la cvs) comes to mind...
Though I guess the semantics of listing a directory are not totally
clear; if I say 'log foo/', and there's
I am at the moment just playing with monotone, but
after reading the e-mail below I started to think a little
bit about how to pick an ancestor for merging.
It is quite an interesting problem, and quite tricky because
for me it seems very hard to make precise what properties you
want for a merge
For some simple browsing in revisions database, I wrote this tool from
shell script. It use only dialog and some simple shell tools (cut, cat
echo, head, tail, sort, ...).
Is not full futured. I wrote this only in some hours today. Is very
simple to handle and fast. The longest time it need to get
Derek Scherger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
certainly, given the same args and possibly --local option, commit,
status, diff, revert should all act on the same things!
Sure. Without path spec on the entire working copy, else on the
path(s) specified.
And, as said, after taking the pain of
May 2005 00:29:48 -0700, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
njs Here's another pathological case for 3-way merge:
njsA
njs|
njsB
njs / \
njs C D
I'd like to throw in $0.02 worth here.
First, this problem has nothing to do with project file operations. The
same
May 2005 00:29:48 -0700, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
njs Here's another pathological case for 3-way merge:
njsA
njs|
njsB
njs / \
njs C D
I'd like to throw in $0.02 worth here.
First, this problem has nothing to do with project file operations. The
same
Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.revctrl/2
Oh. If I understand correctly, then it sounds like the basic storage
that everone's using is suboptimal, and really SCMs should store a big
database of lines, and files get stored as
At 2005-05-07T08:37:14-0700, Joe Wilson wrote:
$ time monotone --db=mt.db --key= pull off.net net.venge.monotone
...
real223m5.784s
user219m30.140s
sys 0m9.827s
I'm assuming you have an adequate network connection, because obviously
pull will take a long time if your network
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:56:03PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.revctrl/2
Oh. If I understand correctly, then it sounds like the basic storage
that everone's using is suboptimal, and
Pull can take a long time to sanity-check revisions (especially on
initial pull to a fresh db), and doesn't provide any feedback during
this. This patch lets packet_consumer and children run a callback when
a revision is written out. Netsync then uses this to add a ticker for
revisions written. Is
15 matches
Mail list logo
