Hi Joe,
Definable in life, indefinable in philosophy is a common occurrence.
Philosophy in general and metaphysics in particular are unusual activities
with rigourous rules so while Quality is indefinable philosophically,
everybody knows what is good and what is not.
John
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014
Hi John,
Metaphysics is not omniphysics. There must be secure borders in reality or
evolution is meaningless. The rigor of metaphysical logic has always been
in dispute. Dispute and clarification follow different pathways
Joe
On 4/25/14 7:22 AM, John Carl ridgecoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe,
there must be borders, I agree but what security you find in them is your
own business. I don't see any hard and fast lines drawn in nature.
John
Ps: omniphysics I like - very clever.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Joseph Maurer jh...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi John,
Metaphysics is
Hi John and All,
How can I know the indefinable? In definable metaphysics I only experience
a partial reality in definable SQ. DQ is indefinable, remaining
conceivable.
Something is jerky in a definable/indefinable statement requiring a
metaphysical orientation beyond definable physics like
Hi T-REXX Techs.
In trying to stabilize a vocabulary for levels in existence conscious and
unconscious can only be sorted out through definition metaphysically not
physical definition.
Metaphysically unconsciousness is not a statement of awareness, but a state
of being like death. How to
Hi Joe,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Joseph Maurer jh...@comcast.net wrote:
How to describe the undead quality in consciousness is
a metaphysical chore.
This kicked loose a recent memory of a book I was reading to my boy at
bedtime - A Terry Pratchett book about sentient rats who
On Apr 11, 2014, at 2:30 PM, david dmbucha...@hotmail.com wrote:
The following was excerpted from Spiritual Snake Oil: Fads Fallacies in
Pop Culture by Chris Edwards.
See any mistakes here? What would you say in response?
Ron:
Judging by the title, Mr. Edwards
Sounds like he will
About Spiritual Snake Oil: Fads Fallacies in Pop Culture by Chris Edwards,
Ron said:
...I have read the entire essay at this point and it is my impression that the
author is not very well read on the topic of philosophy in general. Also, he
seems to be addressing those interpreters of Pirsig
)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:34:40 -0400
From: Ron Kulp xa...@rocketmail.com
To: moq_disc...@moqtalk.org moq_disc...@moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] Spiritual snake oil?
Message-ID: 5873b31e-2b5e-41d8-8081-57218e1be
All,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 1:47 PM, david dmbucha...@hotmail.com wrote:
I had considered recruiting some help to develop a detailed defense of the
MOQ but now I honestly do not think the book deserves that much attention. I
began reading the chapter in question almost hoping to find a
The following was excerpted from Spiritual Snake Oil: Fads Fallacies in Pop
Culture by Chris Edwards.
See any mistakes here? What would you say in response?
Robert Pirsig, author of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, deserves a
lot of credit for getting a wide readership interested
Material is not material.
That's my answer.
MRB
On 4/11/2014 1:30 PM, david wrote:
The following was excerpted from Spiritual Snake Oil: Fads Fallacies in Pop
Culture by Chris Edwards.
See any mistakes here? What would you say in response?
Robert Pirsig, author of Zen and the Art of
I wrote a much longer answer, Mike. But yours says basically the same
thing in 4 simple words.
John
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
All,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:30 PM, david dmbucha...@hotmail.com wrote:
The following was excerpted from Spiritual Snake Oil: Fads Fallacies in
Pop Culture by Chris Edwards.
See any mistakes here? What would you say in response?
Robert Pirsig, author of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle
14 matches
Mail list logo
