[MORPHMET] converting 2D landmarked photos to 3D configuration?

ng Procrustes-based analyses to compare shape. I was hoping that by stitching them into a 3D object, I could deal with slight differences in alignment of the specimens in the photos. Thanks for any advice, Christy -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org

[MORPHMET] convert 2D landmarked photos to a 3D configuration?

d get around those issues. Does anyone know if this is possible, and if so, how? Thanks for any help! Christy -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to morphmet+uns

Re: [MORPHMET] convert 2D landmarked photos to a 3D configuration?

gt; Hi Christy, > > There is a package for R called 'stereomorph', it gives you the tools to > acquire 3D landmark data from the use of 2 camera-setup. Here I give you > some useful links, one the the authors page and the other one is the paper > where it was published

[MORPHMET] 2 PhD positions on CT scanning and ecomorphology of Australian Lizards

Council Linkage Project Grant (mid-2018 to mid-2021) and involve collaborations with Museum Victoria (Dr Jane Melville, Dr Joanna Sumner, Dr Katie Smith-Date), the South Australian Museum (Dr Mark Hutchinson), Dr Christy Hipsley (University of Melbourne), Dr Johannes Müller (Museum für Naturkunde

[MORPHMET] Re: Human Skull Evolution Video?

Hi Abby, The Landmark Editor webpage has lots of resources on that topic, including a powerpoint presentation and video. See here -> http://www.idav.ucdavis.edu/research/EvoMorph Christy On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 10:53:14 AM UTC+11, abbygracedrake wrote: > > Hello! > >

[MORPHMET] testing for convergence in 3D shape space

pe data has a significant phylogenetic signal and I suspect that one ecological group in particular is highly convergent. Thanks for any help! Christy School of BioSciences University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010, Australia Email: chips...@unimelb.edu.au -- MORPHMET may be accesse

[MORPHMET] Re: testing for convergence in 3D shape space

Thanks everyone! On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 1:39:43 AM UTC+11, Christy Hipsley wrote: > > Dear All, > > I'm working with a 3D GM data set and am looking for a specific test of > convergence that also accounts for phylogeny. After some searching it's > s

[MORPHMET] comparing ontogenetic trajectories in a phylogenetic framework

ld also be appreciated! Christy School of BioSciences University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010, Australia Email: chips...@unimelb.edu.au Museum Victoria GPO Box 666 Melbourne VIC 3001,

[MORPHMET] comparing static, evolutionary, and ontogenetic allometry

gh the slopes remain statistically the same (tested using MANCOVA in GeoMorph). Thanks for any advice on how to compare these levels or if it even makes sense to compare ontogenetic allometry to either of the others. Christy ----- Christy Anna Hipsley University of Melbou

[MORPHMET] Re: allometry and phylogeny

y to compare with tip taxa? Thanks for any advice, Christy On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 12:31:37 AM UTC+10, dcadams wrote: > > Damien, > > > > Yes, one can take the regression parameters for each species and use these > as ‘tips’ data to obtain ancestral estimates of the regressi

[MORPHMET] the problem with CVA... or is it?

nd Geomorph for analyses. Best, Christy -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, s

[MORPHMET] Re: the problem with CVA... or is it?

cause it showed very well the environmental gradient along which the different cranial shapes fall. On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 10:04:02 AM UTC+11, Christy Hipsley wrote: > > Dear Morphmet-ers, > > I'm seeking advice on methods for visualizing shape features that > dist

[MORPHMET] Re: the problem with CVA... or is it?

Last reply got a bit mixed - the bat section was for Carmelo... On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 10:04:02 AM UTC+11, Christy Hipsley wrote: > > Dear Morphmet-ers, > > I'm seeking advice on methods for visualizing shape features that > distinguish multiple groups using GM. I

[MORPHMET] Re: procD.allometry with group inclusion

then determine which groups differed in y-intercept, would one set up the advanced.procD.lm model like this and compare the pairwise LS means? advanced.procD.lm(Y ~ size, ~ size+group, groups = ~group, slope = NULL, iter=1) Thanks if you can confirm that I'm setting this up correctly, C

[MORPHMET] fitting lines to allometric plots?

f it's only used for visual comparison, is that technically okay? Thanks for any feedback, Christy -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To u

[MORPHMET] MeshLab - setting default FOV as Ortho?

asked a couple of other colleagues but no happy solution so far - I'm hoping someone here might have the magic answer! Thanks, Christy -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

[MORPHMET] creating mirror reflection of one-side landmarks

is an easy way to do this. I naively tried multiplying the x coordinate dimensions *-1 and keeping y the same, but since the midplane x coordinates are not at 0 this obviously doesn't work. Any advice or code would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Christy -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its

[MORPHMET] modularity tests - effect of negative value in correlation matrix?

e can use to compare modularity hypotheses? In Goswami & Finarelli, they show that reducing the dataset down to 10 individuals from 48 still performs very well, but is there a true minimum? For example could I take the 3 largest individuals from each species for the test? Thanks for any

[MORPHMET] new article out on digital morphology data openness based on Morphmet survey

, not technology, is our biggest challenge to open digital morphology data*', available here -> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-019-0047-0. We thank everyone again who participated, and many others who have engaged in similar conversations over the years. Best, Christy + Emma --

[MORPHMET] papers with 1000+ 3D models?

Hi all, I'm looking for GM or other similar papers that include high numbers of 3D models, like several hundreds or over a thousand. Particularly if these were generated using microCT. Thank you for any help, Christy -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometric

[MORPHMET] Digital morphology data survey: ethics on data generation & use

, Christy Hipsley & Emma Sherratt -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, sen

[MORPHMET] Digital morphology data survey results

data?"*. <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-LPnca12rjzg/WY1FjymbH4I/AAM/GbaUK7LLEDoOAWo76-ubOQ01aalNwVdJgCLcBGAs/s1600/Wordcloud.jpg> We will continue to post our findings here and again we thank everyone for their time and feedback. Best wishes, Christy & Emma Dear Morphmet

[MORPHMET] relative positions of landmark partitions in integration tests - how important?

s the other? Thanks for any advice! Christy *Dr Christy Anna Hipsley | ARC DECRA Fellow * School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne/ Museums Victoria GPO Box 666 Melbourne, Victoria 3001 Australia *T:* +61 3 8341 7423 *E:* christy.hips...@unimelb.edu.au; chips...@museum.vic.gov.au