Re: reading color quoted replies

2007-02-08 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 08, Marc Vaillant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:53:39PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote: Anyway, to the original question: the elinks and links family of text browsers can render HTML colors as ascii. If you use those as your HTML viewers you can get the colors

Re: reading color quoted replies

2007-02-05 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, William Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a vendor who occasionally sends me replies quoted this way. What's ironic is that he normally top-posts, and I suspect he's doing it this way because *I* normally quote inline in response to him. I'm sure this happens here; they are

Re: [OT] Correct way to quote?

2002-09-19 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Sep 20, kevin lyda [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:12:20AM +0200, Markus Garschall wrote: My question doesn't concern mutt directly, but the topic of mail as a whole. no it doesn't... Since I'm using Netscape beside Mutt as Mailer, I wanted to know whether

[PATCH] display-subject

2002-09-11 Thread Jeremy Blosser
The attached patch copies the functionality of the display-address function to display the message subject, by default bound to S. This is useful if your term isn't infinitely wide and/or you have a crowded $index_format. I've been using a version of this since 1.3.2x without any problems; it's

Re: spam harvesting

2002-09-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Sep 01, Peter T. Abplanalp [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 04:31:54PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: Yes, but it's much less likely to happen... a spammer would have to go to a lot of effort (comparatively) to sign up for a list like this... and spamming a list of largely

Re: spam harvesting

2002-09-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Sep 01, Eugen Leitl [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: The problem of spam is easily solvable for technically proficient users. Depening on your philosophy, install SpamAssassin/Vipul's Razor or a tagged message delivery system, and set up a few filters on MUA's side. Once in a while check

Re: [OT] spam harvesting

2002-09-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Sep 01, Eugen Leitl [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: I've been noticing that one too. I'm not familiar with Vipul's or TMDA, but Spamassassin has a rule for when the From: and To: are the same. I think from the ISP mail server admin's point of view

Re: spam harvesting

2002-08-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Aug 31, Aaron Goldblatt [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: an fyi so yall know it's happening, my email address used exclusively for mutt-users and mutt-dev has been harvested for spam. i believe i posted to mutt-users exactly once, and never to mutt-dev. Blame the people that are archiving

Re: spam harvesting

2002-08-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Aug 31, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-31 18:46]: On Aug 31, Aaron Goldblatt [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: .. my email address used exclusively for mutt-users and mutt-dev has been harvested for spam. i believe i posted to mutt

Re: spam harvesting

2002-08-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Sep 01, Cameron Simpson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On 13:44 31 Aug 2002, Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Aug 31, Aaron Goldblatt [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: | an fyi so yall know it's happening, my email address used exclusively | for mutt-users and mutt-dev has been

Re: Emulating (gaaack) Outlook attribution

2002-08-30 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Aug 29, Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote: you can always try but it has been my experience that these people don't want to change to anything other than M$. if your boss is still semi technical this might work; however, if he has

Re: Emulating (gaaack) Outlook attribution

2002-08-30 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Aug 30, Ken Weingold [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote: Is Notes at least able to forward all incoming mail to an address? Our Exchange server doesn't have IMAP enabled either, so I've got some scripts that make it push incoming mail out to a unix

Re: Exchange Exchange!

2002-08-30 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Aug 30, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-30 13:19]: On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote: Is Notes at least able to forward all incoming mail to an address? Our Exchange server doesn't have IMAP enabled either, so I've got some

Re: Emulating (gaaack) Outlook attribution

2002-08-29 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Aug 29, Michael Herman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: At work, I use Linux and have been using Mutt and Sylpheed. Yesterday, my boss complained about the format of my e-mails. So to make him happy, I have developed an attribution string that mimics Outlook. Yes, I have to do the same. :(

Re: save-message to scp

2002-06-24 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jun 24, Rocco Rutte [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hi, * Sascha Huedepohl [02-06-24 12:12:38 +0200] wrote: I think it should be possible to write a little shell script which takes the mail per STDIN, then saves it to a .tmp file and scp that file to the other machine.

Re: tricky limiting

2002-04-11 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Apr 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: ...and then Bruno Postle said... % Go to the first message and press esctesctesct etc.. until you've % tagged all the threads. Then limit to show all tagged messages: Aha! I didn't realize that tagging would go beyond limits. It's manual,

Re: broken link in FAQ

2002-04-10 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Apr 08, fEd Franks [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: The FAQ found at the website URL: http://www/fefe/de/muttfaq/faq.html has a broken link... Under How can I report bugs?, the link check Sven's giantlist of known bugs gets me an HTML error: Forbidden ... I would like to know if my

Re: Sending mail to a recipient

2002-04-04 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Apr 04, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % writing to, but my emails usually start by going into the folder for the % person that I am writing to and clicking an old email from them, then % pressing r which adds in the in-reply-to line in the

Re: French accentuated letters in 1.3.28i - stable snapshot

2002-04-03 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Apr 03, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Charles Gagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-03 14:30]: .. I cannot get mutt-1.3.x to process and display french accentuated letters properly since the support for iconv was introduced. [..] But I compiled libiconv-1.7 and then compiled

Re: display proces id (Re: to GNU ps or not to GNU ps)

2002-04-03 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Apr 03, darren chamberlain [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: (I diff'ed with -caw; is there a preferred option set for mutt patches?) -dup msg26625/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: How do you search to: header?

2002-04-03 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Apr 03, jennyw [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:53:29PM -0500, David T-G wrote: Hmmm... That certainly sounds like the index. Does your help screen look like Yes, I found it. I was just confused about the search function ... I expected it to work like less

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 28, John Buttery [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02/03/28 07:58]: well, I had tried to delete those lines with sed pattern /^\[-- .* --\]$/d but it did not work. however, using the following sed pattern makes them go away: /-- .* --/d

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 28, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Is filter-message seeing the message after the attachment color is applied? s/filter-message/display-filter must not mail before 9am. msg26355/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: 26-Mar-02 at 11:33, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : if you have shell access on your mail machine, and it's on a good connection, i'd just run mutt on the machine itself. ... Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: 27-Mar-02 at 08:33, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Secondly, on a dialup link, it's too slow if you SSH somewhere and you have to /compose/ mail. For moving around the screen

Re: Optimizations?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 27, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: 27-Mar-02 at 11:09, Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : You probably didn't have compression set. Try running ssh with the -C option. It makes a dramatic difference. So, I have PuTTY for SSH, will look into the options and check

Re: unmessage-hook?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there? So once you screw up with the pattern or whatever then you have to correct your setup and restart mutt, right? unhook message-hook This removes all message-hooks currently defined, but it's

Re: unmessage-hook? - unhook message-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:05]: On Mar 27, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: There is no way to remove a message-hook, is there? So once you unhook message-hook This removes all message-hooks currently

Re: unmessage-hook? - unhook message-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 23:49]: Sven [adding one more item for the pet peeves list] The un* functions are pretty clean; I doubt it would be very hard to scratch this one if it itches you. so much for theory

Re: hiding the pgp sig completely from view?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 28, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: [-- Attachment #2 --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --] [-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] that is, mutts still shows the pgp sig (like an extra attachment).

Re: reverse_name question

2002-03-26 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 26, Tim Kennedy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Sorry if this has been asked a lot. I've been looking through the 'net, and various archives of various messages, for an answer to how I can get mutt to reply to emails using the To address, as the From address. ... set reverse_name = yes

Re: Bug Report Guide - additions?

2002-03-25 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 25, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-20 03:23]: Second, it is wrong as far as it goes. flea(1) doesn't send anything to debian.org. SUBMIT=[EMAIL PROTECTED] DEBIAN_SUBMIT=[EMAIL PROTECTED] hmm... isn't DEBIAN_SUBMIT used

Re: Bug Report Guide - additions?

2002-03-25 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 25, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Mar 25, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: well, considering the amount of data this generates mutt-dev isn't the place to take in such huge mails, either. mutt-dev is the place where the developers want the bugs to come so

Re: Defanged HTML headers [WAS: Re: [Announce] Mutt 1.3.28 (BETA) is out.]

2002-03-20 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 18, John Buttery [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-18 08:43:58 -0800]: all I get at this page is the following: HEADDEFANGED_META HTTP-EQUIV=REFRESH CONTENT=0 URL=http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/;/HEAD that is displayed in NS 6.2.1

Re: Bug Report Guide

2002-03-19 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 16, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: I have updated my text about reporting bugs and made it available as a separate page: http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/bugrep.html Additions? Corrections? Feedback welcome! The last sentence of the top section is: The report

Re: display of flagged message in collasped thread

2002-03-19 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 17, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: i am currently using v1.3.27i. is it possible to show the flag-message indicator for a collapsed thread? currently i see when threads are collasped... It can't be done now but it's been requested a few times. msg25751/pgp0.pgp Description:

Re: Mutt 1.3.28 + ncurses 5.2 + xterm = blank screen

2002-03-19 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 18, Thomas E. Dickey [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Pavel Roskin wrote: I've compiled mutt-1.3.28i in the default configuration on RedHat Linux 7.2 (i386) with all updates. If I run it in xterm (from XFree86-4.1.0) or in rxvt-2.7.6, it shows a blank screen.

Re: Mutt 1.3.28 + ncurses 5.2 + xterm = blank screen

2002-03-19 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 19, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Well, I think it was more the other bug where it would get turned on if other development features like hard-tabs were turned on. It was apparently a combination of these two. Sorry, I mean a combination of the colorfgbg bug, and the bug

Re: Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-15 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 15, Shawn McMahon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: This one time, at band camp, Jeremy Blosser wrote: Not for list-reply. The important thing to make this command work is letting mutt know which mails are from lists, using the 'subscribe' and 'lists' commands. Bleargh. What a pain

Re: Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-15 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 15, Shawn McMahon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: This one time, at band camp, Dave Pearson wrote: Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't use list-reply to tell mutt that an email is from a mailing list, I use list-reply to tell mutt that I want to respond to the list it was

Re: GPG revisited

2002-03-15 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 15, Derek D. Martin [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: This really isn't ideal. What I'd like to know is if there is a way to tell mutt when I hit enter to enter a message, do an Esc-P first. This way, the delay is much smaller and virtually unnoticable. Really what I'd like is for mutt to

Re: Non-interactive command line send

2002-03-14 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 14, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 10:24]: I have a script which grabs today's Garfield comic, and /should/ then send it on to my wife. This is what I have: mutt -x -s Daily\ Garfield -a ga$theimg.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED] echo

Re: Semi-OT: Mailman and MUAs

2002-03-11 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 11, Lorin Winchester [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: This is semi-off-topic, but it somewhat relates to Mutt and Mailman. I'm on another mailing list that was recently switched from Majordomo to Mailman. Many times when users try to reply privately to a poster they end up posting to the

Re: Scoring known addresses

2002-03-06 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 28, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (i.e. all addresses defined in aliases) in one single score statement? David Champion has a patch for this... you can find a link to it from www.mutt.org in the user patches section.

Re: Various questions from a new user

2002-03-06 Thread Jeremy Blosser
A little more info... On Mar 04, Mike Schiraldi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: 1: What does the * mean on the tree arrow in a thread? I've searched the manual for this repeatedly, but I must keep missing it. This might not be in there yet -- mutt's threading subsystem was recently

Re: Selecting messages in my threads

2002-02-21 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 21, Daniel Eisenbud [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:52:57PM +, Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu 21-Feb-2002 at 03:28:48PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote: Hmm, but how to do this? Sometimes, messages don't contain my message-id in the

Re: tagging and copying/saving

2002-02-21 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 21, Fred Dech [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: in Elm, i could tag numerous emails and then group copy or save them to a folder. when i try this in Mutt, only the currently selected email gets appended to the specified folder. am i missing something obvious? how is this normally achieved

Re: field parsing behavior

2002-02-20 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 20, Tim Whitehead [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: If someone sends me an email and they don't have their name before their email address, mutt thinks that the name and the email address are the same. When it should recognize that the email address is just the email address. I noticed this

Re: Decrypting GPG-encoded messages

2002-02-15 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 15, Dave Smith [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Is anyone willing/able to send me a .muttrc which works with GnuPG and a recent version of mutt? # Name: forward_decrypt # Type: boolean # Default: yes # Controls the handling of encrypted messages when forwarding a message. When # set, the

Re: forground color of the indicator

2002-02-13 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 13, Marc Bruenink [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Is it possible to set the indicator foreground color to none? I mark new, old mails with colors and so i don't want to let the indicator change it. Currently there isn't, but Mike Schiraldi has a patch which is also in the CVS version that

Re: forground color of the indicator

2002-02-13 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 13, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Feb 13, Marc Bruenink [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Is it possible to set the indicator foreground color to none? I mark new, old mails with colors and so i don't want to let the indicator change it. Currently there isn't, but Mike

Re: [simon@mtds.com: Re: Previous issue with ~/mbox]

2002-02-12 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 12, Simon White [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Now I just need a tip (if anyone has a simple way of doing it) for getting rid of duplicates in mbox (there are loads of each read message) and then I can hack the synchronisation with my inbox myself, I guess. If they are real duplicates (ie

Fwd: [Patch] 1.3.x without iconv

2002-02-12 Thread Jeremy Blosser
There have been various comments here by people attempting to move from the 1.2.x tree to the 1.3.x tree about the new iconv requirement, and the fact that the --without-libiconv option documented in INSTALL does not actually work. Lars Hecking posted the attached message patch to mutt-dev as

Re: setting from on compose

2002-02-12 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 12, Daniel Sully [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hi - I'm not finding the functionality (or it's hiding from me) of when I hit 'c' for composing a message, the ability to set a From: address right there, just like a To: and Subject: line is set. No, I don't want to just edit the headers

Re: How can I underline the current index entry?

2002-02-10 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 10, Benjamin Smith [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 04:01:49PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote: It can't be done. Mono attributes are not currently available when color attributes are being used. Why is this? This is a mutt limitation isn't it, as other ncurses apps

Re: Could I temporarily switch smtp server?

2002-02-10 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 11, Charles Jie [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 09:26:48PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:52:34AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: Due to an annoying firewall strategy on a mailing list server, I can not use my own server to send it mail. What I

Re: How can I underline the current index entry?

2002-02-09 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 09, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: So I'd really like to be able to *underline* the current entry, or perhaps make it bold, or something like that. But I haven't been able to find a way to do this. If the mono settings could somehow work in conjunction with the

Re: Toggle to weed=yes for fwding only

2002-02-08 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 08, William Guynes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: I tend to not want to see all headers normally (having a full screen of headers just doesn't entice me to read the message). But, I tend to need them when I report spam using forward. If you turn off $forward_decode you'll get this effect

Re: Toggle to weed=yes for fwding only

2002-02-08 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 08, Will Yardley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Has anyone else had a desire to be able to toggle weed=yes for only certain instances of pager, reply, or forward? yes. i use: ## put headers in the edit buffer if i'm forwarding macro index f :set header\nforward-message macro index

Re: Toggle to weed=yes for fwding only

2002-02-08 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 08, Will Yardley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Jeremy Blosser wrote: This isn't doing what you think it is. well it has the effect i want anyway, which 'unset header' doesn't. You miss the point; it shouldn't have any effect at all. And by shouldn't I mean doesn't, unless I'm

Re: Scripted GPG-encrypted mails

2002-02-07 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 07, Dave Smith [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:30:03AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I'm not sure how to do this on the command line, but in a script (or possibly on the command line given enough voodoo) you could gpg-encrypt the file first, use

Re: Sorting in mailbox question

2002-02-06 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 06, Christian Ordig [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:40:48PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: I guess what I'm looking for is a way to sort by thread/subject/date rather than just thread/subject. It doesn't look like I can use sort and sort_aux to do this.

Re: Sorting in mailbox question

2002-02-06 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 06, Daniel Eisenbud [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: I've been planning to do this for a while. It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of sorting is useful is when the first level is threads. If anyone can give me a plausible scenario where they'd want more than

Re: Breaking News: Lusers _want_ to quote email replies The Right Way.

2002-02-06 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 06, Rob 'Feztaa' Park [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: I just got an email from a nondescript luser asking how I put my replies after the quote, The Right Way. She uses LookOut, of course, and doesn't like the default quote style that it uses. She says that the way I do it is so cool. I'm

[OT] handling outlook cal stuff

2002-02-04 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Looking for recommendations on a way to get outlook appts and other calendar stuff into something more open, such as ical. Found outlook2ical on freshmeat, just wondering what other options are recommended, if any. TIA. msg24186/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ~b pattern and encrypted messages

2002-02-04 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 04, Brian Clark [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: If I set this up in my .muttrc: color index brightblue white ~b foobar Or this: color index brightblue white ~b \foobar\ And I open a mbox where every single message is encrypted, as soon as I enter that mbox I get the prompt for my

Re: 'N' indicator in folder list

2002-02-04 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 04, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: So tell me a bit about Maildir... When new mail arrives, it is written to tmp/ and then atomically moved to new/, right? Does it stay in new/ until you read it and it moves to cur/? If that's the usual behavior, Yes. when you e'x'it or

Re: regex isn't working in color index ~C ... context

2002-02-03 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 03, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: #color index brightwhite default ~C $alternates color index brightwhite default ~C (parv_@yahoo\.com|parv@(localhost|.*holy\.cow)) ...i get error message while starting mutt... Error in /home/parv/cf/mail/mutt.cf, line 58: parentheses not

Re: regex isn't working in color index ~C ... context

2002-02-03 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 03, Cedric Duval [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Jeremy Blosser wrote: On Feb 03, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: #color index brightwhite default ~C $alternates ^^ Am I missing something? I believe the main goal of the original poster

Re: Sorceforge bouncing mail: Create Postmaster Account ??

2002-02-02 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 02, John P Verel [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: I have the impression that this is unsolvable. In any case, if I attempt to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get this message: This has nothing to do with mutt. Create (or get your admins to create) a postmaster address for this domain, as is

Re: Exporting a message?

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 31, Michael Elkins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Philip Mak wrote: I don't suppose there's a command like pipe-message, except that it filters headers (the header filtering code is already available in the pager, after all)? Or would I have to write an external header filtering

Re: s/mime questions

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Mike Schiraldi wrote: [...] Just a question: Is it really necessary to attach at each message the smime.p7s file (your signature or so)? It has always about the 10th size of your underlying posting, so it increases the size of your

Re: s/mime questions

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, Mike Schiraldi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: To me the ideal solution to the bandwidth issue would be a system that allowed you to send the whole key with the sig to certain people, and let people request it from key servers in other cases (mailing lists). I could attach just a

Re: s/mime questions

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, Mike Schiraldi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: It would only work among mailers that knew how to use it, but many people that know enough to care about this are going to be using a decent mailer. Part of the problem with PGP is that only people that know enough to care use it. My

Re: s/mime questions

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, Will Yardley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: yeah i think the issue is not so much of technical sophistication (although that's an issue too) as of the fact that most people Don't Care. 99% of the people i correspond with simply don't care, so i generally don't bother to encrypt or

Re: s/mime questions

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, Mike Schiraldi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: [2] I guess this is where we disagree - you seem to think that there is little overlap between the set of people who care about email security and the set of people who good mailers .. i think there is a lot. No, I think that the

Re: s/mime questions

2002-02-01 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 02, Stephan Seitz [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:36:13PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote Neither of these are necessarily true. HTTPS is a good example. Most ebay and amazon users have no idea of any of the technical issues involved with using SSL, but because

Re: is it possible to have color reversed indicator?

2002-01-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 31, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: i am using mutt 1.3.27i, and i tried... color indicator reverse ...which, of course, doesn't work as desired. what i want/wish is to have indicator in reverse colors in the index. mono reverse is, well, not colored. possible? Not

Re: Pity that mutt doesn't read news - what's the best match?

2002-01-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, Charles Jie [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: I have been a netscape user. Now I'm satisfied with mutt and will not go back to netscape except one thing - reading news groups. Could any Mutter suggest a good news reader of mutt style? (Highly customizable) SLRN. Much of Mutt's user

Re: how best to forward attachments

2002-01-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 31, Mark Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Generally, I want to forward all attachments along with any message I am forwarding. What's the best way to configure mutt to achieve this? see the manual entry for mime_forward. msg24044/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: fetchmail to MTA to procmail (WAS Re: folders ?)

2002-01-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Feb 01, Prahlad Vaidyanathan [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 Knute spewed into the ether: [-- snip --] fetchmail - MTA - procmail - folder(s) or am I missing something ? What I meant was that when you hit G for the default getmail function

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

2002-01-30 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 30, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Currently I have to print msg's via the pipe command. I have 2 questions regarding this: 1. How can I print only the headers I see on the screen as opposed to all of them when I '| lpr'? Well using pipe, set pipe_decode. 2. Why do I

Re: 2 Q's about printing...

2002-01-30 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 30, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * and then Igor Pruchanskiy blurted I am using muttprint. It is superior. I have used a2ps and enscript before, but i ended up with muttprint and i love it. Even though my boss makes fun of a cute little penguin :) Hmmm much

Re: Mails received as attachment?

2002-01-29 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 29, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: from inside the untarred mutt dir: $ patch --dry-run -i ../dales_patch-xxx [snip] can't find file to patch at input line 147 Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option? [snip] and that's where I'm stuck, I've tried -p0 and

Re: rewriting message stautus

2002-01-29 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:38:45PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote: Yeah, you can do some great stuff with that. My own settings do the following: Sounds great, maybe you could send part of your muttrc responsible for such colors? Heh

Re: Mails received as attachment?

2002-01-29 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 29, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hmmm... Thanks Jeremy, that's getting results, unfortunately it's failing on each hunk? What output? msg23953/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Mails received as attachment?

2002-01-29 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 29, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * and then Jeremy Blosser blurted On Jan 29, Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hmmm... Thanks Jeremy, that's getting results, unfortunately it's failing on each hunk? What

Re: Mails received as attachment?

2002-01-29 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 29, Dale Woolridge [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: http://www.woolridge.org/mutt/patches/patch-1.3.26.dw.pgp-traditional.2 It will apply cleanly to 1.3.26, but I don't know about 1.5.0. If the patch applies cleanly to 1.5, please let me know. Nope. Note that Thomas has been

Re: rewriting message stautus

2002-01-29 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 29, Michael Montagne [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: folder-hook lists 'color index brightmagenta default ~x mithrandir.codesorcery.net !~P' Can you explain how this works? It matches if the References: header (specified by the ~x pattern) contains the pattern

Re: mutt-1.5.0, was Re: \223 and \224

2002-01-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 28, Russell Hoover [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0i Could this mean that a 1.5.0 release is around the corner? I'm asking because, if it is, I'd like to tell my admin to hold off upgrading from 1.3.25 to 1.3.27, if 1.5.0 will

Re: forwarding and headers

2002-01-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 28, Brian Clark [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: When I'm forwarding a message, is there any way to turn off the inclusion of the complete headers? I've been weeding them myself for far too long. You will get the same headers in the forwarded version that you see when viewing the message,

Re: rewriting message stautus

2002-01-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 28, Nicholas A. Martini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or another address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would be handy for high-volume lists. depends... if you mean to do it at any given time, use: T

Re: rewriting message stautus

2002-01-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 28, Justin R. Miller [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Thus spake Nicholas A. Martini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): does anyone know how to make mutt show messages from yoursef (or another address) show up as read, or not new, or something? it would be handy for high-volume lists. Well, as for

Re: rewriting message stautus

2002-01-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 28, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: ...and then Justin R. Miller said... % folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n' You'd want to clear the new flag instead of toggle it, or when he entered the folder a second time all of his old new messages would be new and then his new new

Re: rewriting message stautus

2002-01-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 29, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: when you want something done, you have to do it yourself. enough w/ all the fudging! given all the guesses flying around, i fed up and tried on my own. so here it is... Er, what fudging? What you have is pretty much identical to what was

Re: rewriting message stautus

2002-01-28 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 29, parv [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Justin R. Miller thusly... folder-hook . push 'T~N~P\n;N\n\ct.\n' i tried the above which works (1.3.25i), or at least worked once. can anybody enlighten me why the variation below does not? folder-hook

Re: html email

2002-01-26 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 26, Michael Maibaum [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: My favorite was the last bi-monthly report from our (win NT dominated...) IT dept...It was a 4Mb word document for about a page and a half, plus some high res pics, plus all the revisions in the word document. It was sent to every email

Re: html email

2002-01-26 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 25, David Ellement [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: I also see this fairly often. Of course, because these folks care about how their message looks, they also include stationery, background or border images. So I'll get a multipart/alternative message with one or two image attachments,

Re: html email

2002-01-26 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 26, Rob 'Feztaa' Park [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Alas! Jeremy Blosser spake thus: one of the managers actually suggested it was a flaw of qmail that it didn't crash at this point, to act as a break point. :) Linux: Too stable for it's own good! That's a new one on me ;) Yeah

Re: html email

2002-01-26 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Jan 26, Knute [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Isn't that what logs are for? You know, to help diagnose issues such as that. Yeah. Our group maintains/checks our logs. The others... It's actually been hard for management to adjust to the idea that we can tell them what happened when they

  1   2   3   4   >