Hi there,
On Wed, Mar 08 2000 09:07:22 +0100 wrote Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE
with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName":
If these attachments do not have a Content-Disposition filename=
field, this would appear correct.
[...]
For instance, a recent message sent to mutt-dev
Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Mar 2000:
Besides, when releasing software that is still in beta testing, how do
you count versions according to the Linux kernel way? For example, the
previous Mutt beta was 1.1.7. Since the current release is still beta,
shouldn't it be
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:13:14AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote:
:
: :Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes
: :against 1.1.7 include fixes for one recent and one
: :long-standing, but mostly unnoticed bug.
:
: Just a quick observation. Mutt is one of the few pieces of
Stefan Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[-- Type: application/msword, Encoding: base64, Size: 16K --]
Content-Type: application/msword; name="Schedule.doc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Schedule.doc"
and one of my recently mailed mutt mails shows
On 2000-03-09 01:56:21 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
Besides, when releasing software that is still in beta
testing, how do you count versions according to the
Linux kernel way? For example, the previous Mutt beta
was 1.1.7. Since the current release is still beta,
shouldn't it be numbered as
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 04:18:20PM +0530, Mrinal Kalakrishnan wrote:
No, the minor version is what shows whether it's beta or not. So in
1.1.8, second `1' shows that it's a beta version. The stable release
will be 1.2.x.
Not exactly. There are development-only (non-BETA) versions, as
1.1
Hi,
Eugene Lee typed:
Besides, when releasing software that is still in beta testing, how do
you count versions according to the Linux kernel way? For example, the
previous Mutt beta was 1.1.7. Since the current release is still beta,
shouldn't it be numbered as 1.1.9 ?
No, the minor
When i used pine,i could jump to a URL int he message with down-arrow,
and view it with a return key and lynx. Is there something similar
for mutt? Is it just a simple mailcap entry? If so, how do i select
the URL to be viewed?
See http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.12
Hi all,
i have 2 questions.
When i used pine,i could jump to a URL int he message with down-arrow,
and view it with a return key and lynx. Is there something similar
for mutt? Is it just a simple mailcap entry? If so, how do i select
the URL to be viewed?
Also, in pine i could change the
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 09 2000 10:10:13 + wrote Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
with subject "Re: attachments appear as NoName":
Here you're comparing a text/plain attachment produced by mutt with an
application/msword attachment produced by some by some other MUA.
I didn't pay attention to the different
A few more tweaks, and i'll be almost there.
I've noticed that sometimes when i reply to a message in a saved
folder,or sometimes even the inbox, mutt complains that it cannot
write the sent message because /foldername/sent does not exist. I
assume this means i need to set the saved messages
J McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that sometimes when i reply to a message in a saved
folder,or sometimes even the inbox, mutt complains that it cannot
write the sent message because /foldername/sent does not exist. I
assume this means i need to set the saved messages folder
I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as easily.
I checked the feature list, and it is extensive. Most of what mutt
offers, thebat offers. Why is the advantage of mutt, or any
text-based email client?
--
-=
Mrinal --
...and then Mrinal Kalakrishnan said...
% Hi,
Hi!
%
% Gero Treuner typed:
% Not exactly. There are development-only (non-BETA) versions, as
% 1.1 through 1.1.5 are.
%
% OK, I didn't know that. I just labelled all versions that are not the
% stable release as `beta'.
Not a bad
Hi!
...and then J McKitrick said...
% I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
% argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as easily.
% I checked the feature list, and it is extensive. Most of what mutt
Any pointers to such a thing so that we can
Stefan --
I've lost track of whether [the argument is that] mutt should put a
'name="*"' parameter on the Content-Type: header or [the complaint is
that] mutt expects such a parameter. It seems to me that either can be
fixed with scripts.
1) If we want mutt to provide the parameter, change
In my .muttrc I have:
set folder_format="%3C %N %-32.32f %-16.16d %s"
However, the space with the %N is always blank when I do 'c' and '?'
to browse mailboxes. Is there something special I have to do to get
this to work? FWIW I'm delivering mail into these folders with
procmail.
--
J McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as
easily.
Such arguments rarely lead to a useful exchange of information. They
more usually end up as "My computer can beat up
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 02:02:23PM +0530, Mrinal Kalakrishnan wrote:
I was wondering if there is a feature by which, when I reply to, say
this mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the `To:' line should become
the whole name and address from my alias file - i.e. `The Mutt Users
List [EMAIL
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 07:22:05PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
[snip]
Of course, the bat doesn't support IMAP, while mutt does.
Other than that, it looks like it's just a matter of GUI vs text.
Hmmm... not according to it's feature list. "support for imap4, pop, apop,
smtp protocols"
regards,
I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to
be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then
start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works
fine. But I can't figure out how to get it to reset to my default
.signature file for the
Josh Kuperman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Mar 2000:
The commented out line always gets matched and will force the
default signature. Is is simply changing the order?
Yes, the order is significant. Put the default send-hook first.
And, incidentally, the best (or recommended) way of
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 01:57:08PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Such arguments rarely lead to a useful exchange of information. They
more usually end up as "My computer can beat up your computer" type of
"discussion." Is your friend actually interested in learning from this
exchange, or
Drew Bloechl wrote:
: In my .muttrc I have:
:
: set folder_format="%3C %N %-32.32f %-16.16d %s"
:
: However, the space with the %N is always blank when I do 'c' and '?'
: to browse mailboxes. Is there something special I have to do to get
: this to work? FWIW I'm delivering mail into these
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote:
I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to
be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then
start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works
fine. But I can't
Josh Kuperman writes:
I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to
be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then
start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works
fine. But I can't figure out how to get it to reset to my
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to
be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then
start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 09 2000 21:16:32 +0100 wrote Stefan `Sec` Zehl
with subject "Re: Reply to full name from alias list":
Does this patch:
http://sec.42.org/mutt/patch-0.95.4.sec.reverse_reply.1
| patch-0.95.4.sec.reverse_reply.1:
| extends reverse_alias to also fix the Realnames in outgoing
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:08:42AM +0200, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
Drew Bloechl wrote:
: In my .muttrc I have:
:
: set folder_format="%3C %N %-32.32f %-16.16d %s"
:
: However, the space with the %N is always blank when I do 'c' and '?'
: to browse mailboxes. Is there something special
Actually, maybe it's my fault here. I always tell him my unix box can
beat up his windows box with one hard drive tied behind its back. He
just argues that windows is simpler, and that power tools should be
made easier to use.
But then they wouldn't be power tools anymore ;-)
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:39:45PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
:
:I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
:argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as easily.
:I checked the feature list, and it is extensive. Most of what mutt
:offers, thebat offers.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Jim Toth wrote:
:On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
:said:
:
: The commented out line always gets matched and will force the
: default signature. Is is simply changing the order?
:
:Yep, that's it. From the
on Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:20:07PM -0800, Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:39:45PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
:
:I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
:argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as easily.
:I checked
Eugene Josh, et al --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
% On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Jim Toth wrote:
% :
% : When multiple matches occur, commands are executed in the order
% : they are specified in the muttrc.
%
% I got bit by this too just a little while ago. I guess I'm
34 matches
Mail list logo
