Hi!
...and then J McKitrick said...
% I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
% argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as easily.
% I checked the feature list, and it is extensive. Most of what mutt
Any pointers to such a thing so that we can compare?
% offers, thebat offers. Why is the advantage of mutt, or any
% text-based email client?
Well, you mentioned your "windows" friend, so that's one reason right
there: mutt runs under unix-like variants.
I like text-based email clients because I like text-based email. No GUIs
for this guy.
I also like all of the hook functionality and the ability to do various
things based on various conditions. I haven't seen anything else that
comes close.
I'll leave it to someone who really takes advantage of mutt's featureset
to plug it -- once we have any idea what we're up against, so to speak.
Without a comparative list of features, just throw the mutt manual at any
challengers (and hope to hit 'em square on ;-)
% --
% -=> jm <=-
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*
PGP signature
