On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 02:37:19AM +0100, Glyn Millington wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I
> send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place
> to find out?
In your .muttrc:
set copy
- Myrddin
---
try this in your .muttrc :
my_hdr Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
peter
On 25 Oct 00, 2:37AM, Glyn Millington wrote:
> Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I
> send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place
> to find out?
--
Peter Jaqu
On 25 Oct 00, 12:01AM, Morten Liebach wrote:
> application/msword; catdoc -s iso8859-1 %s|less; cupiousoutput
try spelling it "copiousoutput";)
peter
PGP signature
Glyn Millington proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I
> send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place
> to find out?
Mutt generally saves copies of sent mails - anyway, rtfm about fcc hooks.
--
Martin Schweizer proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I've FreeBSD4.0 and Mutt 1.0.1i. It runs ok but I've some questions:
> - when I start Mutt the following error occurs: "repetion-operator operand
> invalid"
Try recompiling it.
> - when I send mails the following error occurs: "/home/info/Mail/
Mark Weinem proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Benjamin Korvemaker wrote:
> > See "grepm" and "grepmail"
> But are there no tools for Maildirs?
I believe grepmail does maildirs rather well.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.or
Hi!
Is it possible to set up Mutt to send a blind copy to myself each time I
send out an email? Can anyone tell me how, or point me to the right place
to find out?
TIA
Glyn M
--
* None can love freedom he
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> Depends on what you're using the resend feature for. If you're resending a
> message that you already sent it should already be in your Fcc and what's the
> point of adding it again?
True, but in that case you can delete the Fcc from the
Hi!
I'm getting a lot af mail with *.doc files attached, and I'd like to
use catdoc to show them in mutt, how do I do that?
I have the line:
application/msword; catdoc -s iso8859-1 %s|less; cupiousoutput
in my ~/.mutt_mailcap, and an autoview antry for it in my ~/.muttrc, and
I still
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:25:22PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with
> resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed,
> it could even be called a bug.
>
> So: There is no Fcc unless you remember to manually add o
Hello All,
My users convinced me to go to IMAP for the mail system verses using
sendmail/local mailboxes/POP. They swore up and down that the old
command line junkies like me would not be effected. So I let them
implement cyrus IMAP. I can get to my inbox ( {localhost:143}INBOX )
but I ca
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Benjamin Korvemaker wrote:
> See "grepm" and "grepmail"
But are there no tools for Maildirs?
Ciao,
Mark
PGP signature
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
>
>Is this classified as a bug, or a feature? :)
It's a feature, a design desicision. Since you can use any muttrc
command in send-hooks, it would be unworkably complex to try to limit
the scope to
Jeff Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> Hi all. Is there some setting that I haven't been able to find that
> allows me to set a default search pattern in the pager?
Not beyond doing a macro which first invokes a pager and then does a
"PATTERN" (where PATTERN is your pattern).
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:32:15PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> > exactly. when you set the sig, or a header, it's not only for that message.
> > so you need to do something like:
> >
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
> > send-hook . 'unset signature'
>
>Cool, so it's not just me...
>
>
* On Tuesday, October 24, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> > Not: macro generic \eu "f=sentmail"
>
> This should in theory work if you have remembered to remove the
> default key bindings for u in the various menus which
> otherwise will take precedence over the generic definition.
No, I don't have any
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
>I've got alternates set, and I tried both set reverse_name and set
> reverse_realname. I'm not having any luck with either. With mail
> addresses to a different address (actually different user, same domain),
> when I hit reply, I
Mark Weinem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 23 Oct 2000:
> Is it possible to attach a file via macro?
Sure.
> This doesn't work:
>
> macro compose "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime"
>
> Perhaps it would be more elegant if the macro just offers the
> templates directory and the use
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:22:30PM -0400, Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> > set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)"
> >
> > send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hd
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 20:48:31 +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote:
> * On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with
> > resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed,
> > it could even be called a bug.
>
> He
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)"
>
> send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hdr From: company support
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'set si
Hi! I figured out how to set things up so that now I can properly reply to
different people based on the original inbound email address.
But I ran into a strange occurrence, which I'm not sure is my fault.
I've set up mutt so that:
set reverse_name
set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
a
Hello
I've FreeBSD4.0 and Mutt 1.0.1i. It runs ok but I've some questions:
- when I start Mutt the following error occurs: "repetion-operator operand
invalid"
- when I send mails the following error occurs: "/home/info/Mail/sent: No
such file or directory (errno=2)" . I know there are some variabl
Paul Makepeace muttered:
> 1) How I do instruct mutt to recognize me as a
> variety of alternate email addresses
see $alternates
> 2) Turn off a limited view.
(l)imit to ~A or .
HTH,
Michael
--
APL hackers do it in the quad.
PGP-Key: http://www.stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:48:31PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg muttered:
> * On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with
> > resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed,
> > it could even be called a bug.
>
* On Tuesday, October 24, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> You're missing that there's no default Fcc value provided with
> resend-message. This is certainly something I think should be changed,
> it could even be called a bug.
Hey, a mutt bug, I didn't think those existed! Anyway, I've been
trying to so
Using a large mallet, Adrian Chung whacked out:
> when I hit reply, I get my username @ my.local.machine.name.
likely you have to set the envelope sender too - post the relevant parts of
your muttrc plz
>Why don't you like qmail?
it's an allergy of some kind :P I prefer exim (or i
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 00:01:18 +0200, Mark Weinem wrote:
> Is it possible to attach a file via macro?
>
> This doesn't work:
>
> macro compose "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime"
Try this:
macro compose "/home/mark/templates/mime"
> Perhaps it would be more elegant if the macro j
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:13:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > The suggestions I've heard say to do something like:
>
> > send-hook \
> > '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
> > 'my_hdr From: [EM
Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The suggestions I've heard say to do something like:
> send-hook \
> '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
> 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
set alternates, and set reverse_name
> I'm assuming that this is a feature that
Hi all! A co-worker stated the other day that the biggest feature that has
kept him from switching from Pine to mutt is the fact that pine supports
roles.
>From what I could gather, a role in pine basically allows you to set your
From: email address depending on who the message you're replying t
On 2000.10.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Dan Boger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yikes! why would you want to ever overwrite a whole folder with one message?
> I'd be scared of hitting o by mistake...
Mutt treats all save files as folders. Sometimes you just want the one
message, but
Hi all. Is there some setting that I haven't been able to find that
allows me to set a default search pattern in the pager?
I have a set of cron jobs that run hourly that send me updates from
various systems & processes, and I'd like to be able to just open mutt
& recall this default search patte
Big Brother tells me that Marco Giardini wrote:
> I'd like that all the outgoing mail to a certain e.mail address are
> saved automatically in a special folder instead of in the outbox
> one.
> Is it possible? If yes, how?
> Thanks for replying
fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +special-folder
--
"Rest
I'd like that all the outgoing mail to a certain e.mail address are
saved automatically in a special folder instead of in the outbox
one.
Is it possible? If yes, how?
Thanks for replying
.oesse.
--
--
Marco Giardini
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> ... and not supported by MTAs different from sendmail, such as
> postfix or qmail, right?
Right for qmail too.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer
Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> So: what I would have expected to happen is that the newly sent
> message be saved to my out-mailbox, since it is in effect a new
> message sent from me.
>
> What am I missing?
You're missing that there's no default Fcc value prov
Thomas Roessler proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On 2000-10-24 15:21:12 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > RFC 2076 - Common Internet Message Headers
> That's a summary of existing usage
Yes - and it documents the common usages of the Priority: header.
> > RFC 2524 - EMSD (Efficient
Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the
> > receiver notices this.
> > I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:).
> > It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an
> > standard mail client
> > Some MUAs (elm, I think) provide support for a Precedence:
> > header, but this header does something very different: it allows
> > to tweak the priority of messages (= sort order) in sendmail's
> > queue. The algorithm behind that is described in the Sendmail
> > Installation and Operat
On 2000-10-24 11:10:28 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Some MUAs (elm, I think) provide support for a Precedence:
> header, but this header does something very different: it allows
> to tweak the priority of messages (= sort order) in sendmail's
> queue. The algorithm behind that is described in
> Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the
> receiver notices this.
> I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:).
> It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an
> standard mail client feature? Or this not depreciated
On 2000-10-24 15:21:12 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> RFC 2076 - Common Internet Message Headers
That's a summary of existing usage
> RFC 2524 - EMSD (Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery)
Don't know that one. Does it define a priority mechanism?
--
Thomas Roessler
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 08:31:45PM +1100, raf wrote:
> raf wrote:
>
> > Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> >
> > > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > > : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> > > : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
> > >
Thomas Roessler proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On 2000-10-24 10:03:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > This might be better off as an editor macro, IMHO.
> I could imagine a nice function in mutt.
> However, does anyone have an RFC for this which we could implement?
Hi - try these
On 2000-10-24 10:03:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> This might be better off as an editor macro, IMHO.
I could imagine a nice function in mutt.
However, does anyone have an RFC for this which we could implement?
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
raf wrote:
> Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>
> > Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> > : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
> >^
> > gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at
Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
>^
> gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands
Hello list!
I can't get the "new" resend-message feature to work as I expect it to
do. If I try using a previously sent e-mail as a template for a new one,
hitting -e, I get the old e-mail in my editor. Works fine. But,
after I edit this "template", and then send it, there is no trace in
my out-m
* Bruce DeVisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001023 23:20]:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 05:02:21PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > Is there a way (1.3.10i if it matters) to set the mailbox list order?
> > I.E. I want it to be reverse date sent always (I do O d when I get
> > into it).
> >
> > I can't see
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:08:14AM +0300, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> : I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
> : raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
>^
> gpg.rc don't use gpg_2co
Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
: I may stick with GnuPG as is. However that
: raises my original question. gpg.rc uses gpg_2comp (I may have the name
^
gpg.rc don't use gpg_2comp starting at 2000-03-03. All commands what use
gpg_2comp is commented out
raf proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> or FEATURE(`rbl') to make use of realtime blackhole list at rbl.maps.vix.com.
> then you don't have to do anything else :)
Use both. They go hand in hand.
-s (just because you think a guy is a bozo, you can't have his domain
RBL'd - see htt
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Corey G. proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > Procmail simply needs to use many of the filters that were presented on
> > this list, but the most powerful weapon is with sendmail. I use code
> > that I found from sendmail.org which rejects domains found in a tex
54 matches
Mail list logo
