Re: save in folder of all recipients including CC

2009-07-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Eric Smith wrote: Is there a patch for mutt to save mails in the folders of all To: recipients and all Cc: recipients as specified in the save-hook command? You mean mutt should pull out all recipient addresses and simulate a save-hook to find out where to save a copy and do that? It

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

2009-07-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Paul Grinberg wrote: Does anyone know workaround for the problem with Outlook handling of the digital signatures. (.dat file) I think I once read something about an Outlook plugin that would support it. If that's not an option, you can try to send inline (traditional) PGP though that's

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

2009-07-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Paul Grinberg wrote: Btw, why does use of inline (traditional) PGP strongly discouraged? There're many reasons, one of them that it's hard to detect reliably (i.e. it's horrible to code detection of nested traditional parts). With PGP/MIME you get reliable separation of different parts

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

2009-08-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Alexander Dahl wrote: PGP though that's strongly discouraged. It doesn't give you a pointless attachment but some pointless lines of text at top/bottom of your mail. Did you ever try to explain this to the developers of Enigmail (GnuPG extension for Mozilla Thunderbird)? No, not

Re: Using templates - [plain text]

2009-08-02 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 01:18:37PM -0400, Patrick Gen Paul wrote: I don't understand why mutt prompts me for the To: since mutt already knows the answer, or why it prompts me for the Cc: since my template leaves it blank, while it is not prompting for the Bcc: - or even for the Subject:. See

Re: send2-hook not working for me

2009-08-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Erik Christiansen wrote: When composing an email to e.g. family, while in a list-related mailbox, I'd like to temporarily reassign Reply-To:, overriding the current folder-hook. Using the manual, and experiences found on the list, I've come as far as this in .muttrc: send2-hook '~t

Re: send2-hook not working for me

2009-08-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Erik Christiansen wrote: Well, in the manual I'd read send2-hook is matched every time a message is changed, either by editing it, or by using the compose menu to change its recipients or subject. I thought that might be useful, but have yet to find out. I'm not entirely sure on this,

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:11:58AM -0600, lee wrote: Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not seeing a special character in the signature. Yes, it's just that this one has zero width and there mutt ignores it (as it does for 0x200b). Rocco

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: As to where it comes from, the character is in the signature file. I wouldn't expect the MUA to remove characters from the signature file. Not in general, but this one is special. ;-) Not from mutt's view. Why is it

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:26:57AM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote: No messages will be auto deleted. The only thing that happens is that messages you earlier have marked as to be deleted will be actually deleted. Or better, any changes you have made to the status of the message is comitted.

Re: specifying a browser

2009-08-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Robert Holtzman wrote: According to the mutt manual, to start a www browser an external program has to be downloaded from ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/contrib/. The problem is I get a Failed to Connect error. I can connect to www.guug.de but, of course that does me no good. Any ideas

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Marc Vaillant wrote: Can't this easily be controlled? set delete=ask-yes. If that's not enough, it suggests that deleting messages should be abstracted from sync-mailbox so that you can sync flags and delete messages independently. Loosing reply flags on e.g. support email--where

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Rejo Zenger wrote: If it's off by default, I think this functionality would be a usefull addition. It's not something I am missing now per se, but I would consider start using it when it's available. The problem with adding new options for features is that if you don't follow the

Re: signature-scripts

2009-08-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Paul Grinberg wrote: [u...@panther ~]$ cat .signature #!/bin/bash echo Paul Grinberg echo PGP key: 0xE3175CCF echo echo Fortune Cookie: fortune -s wisdom echo [u...@panther ~]$ cat .muttrc | grep sig set sig_on_top=yes set signature=~/.signature | So you're well-prepared to

Re: hdr_order not working

2009-08-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
[ please try to keep a line length limit of something around 72 ]] Hi, * dv1...@wayne.edu wrote: Well, I found /usr/local/etc/Muttrc, and it does have unignore and hdr_order in there. I commented them out, and now mutt reads my settings. But: (1) Isn't my muttrc supposed to override

Re: What is the best way to approach Deleted mail removal from

2009-08-17 Thread Rocco Rutte
[ btw, any idea why your subject is truncated? ] Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Thursday, August 13 at 10:38 AM, quoth Paul Grinberg: So, let's say my fetchmail keeps all the mail on the mail server after mail download is complete. Without being rude, let me stop you right there. Fetchmail

Re: What is the best way to approach Deleted mail removal from

2009-08-17 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: But mutt DOES have a message cache (if you enable it) that you can inspect without being online. See the documentation of 'message_cachedir'. But then you must have viewed the message at least once. That a message is not in the cache means either a) deleted or b)

Re: Quick suggestion

2009-08-17 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Edd Barrett wrote: What do you think of a progress indication when you close a large mailbox. I use mutt with gmail and frequently when I close a mailing list folder it takes a while. User feedback would be nice :) I have a patch in my queue at bitbucket that does this:

Re: strange results w/ m command

2009-08-17 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Robert Holtzman wrote: Any ideas appreciated. Well, for the postpone issue, see the $postpone setting in your local copy of the manual or online. The bindings: mutt is not disabling them (why should it), you probably didn't specify them for the postponed menu. For all available menus,

Re: more strange behavior

2009-08-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Robert Holtzman wrote: After getting the weirdness with the m command sorted out, a new problem cropped up. When Mutt first opens it reads all the mailboxes over and over and over. What makes you think so? A progress indicator at the bottom? What does it say exactly? This goes on for

Re: What is the best way to approach Deleted mail removal from

2009-08-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Monday, August 17 at 12:32 PM, quoth Rocco Rutte: [ btw, any idea why your subject is truncated? ] Huh... I hadn't noticed that. I haven't a clue. Is this one also truncated? No, this one is “fine”. If you have no choice but to use POP3, I highly recommend

Re: defining a command

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my % own commands. Something like: % % define my-command-1 'mutt-command-1mutt-command-2enter' % define my

Re: defining a command

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:56:43:AM -0600 Jeremy Blosser wrote: Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have. Yepp. Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;) It would be

Re: Replacing a message with its filtered output

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:33:47:PM -0800 Gary Johnson wrote: You're going to too much work, and I would imagine that the results don't look very good. To fix HTML e-mail, just put this in your mailcap file: text/html; w3m -dump %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput and this in

Re: experience/questions : switching from Netscape to mutt

2002-03-21 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:10:52:AM +0100 Flavien wrote: *) When reading a list, I often press 'd'. I would like mutt to display the next _unread_ message, and not the next message in the list (I have the messages sorted by thread, thus it often displays messages I already read). Just

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:09:41:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Care to give some examples? if [ muttversion != 1.5.0 ]; then source ~/.mutt/setup/nntp fi But you're right, this one may be done with a bash script. But - to me - it looks ugly havin a good mail client and some sort of

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet - nntp patch vs BCC?

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:09:40:PM -0500 Andre Berger wrote: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500: well, does this BCC header get posted, too? if not then I don't a problem.. *shrug* Indirectly: To: undisclosed recipients ; is generated, but no mail is sent.

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 02:50:29:PM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote: * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-22 01:40]: At least connditionals are absolutely missing in mutt's config file functionality. .. and also missing with setup files for elm, pine, outlook, ... All mail clients suck

Re: Can I use mutt to notify a message to all PC users running MS Windows on the network?

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:16:52:AM -0600 David DeSimone wrote: J. Effendi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I use mutt to replace this kind of notification messages to all users easily? Where can I get more information about it? Others have answered your first question, but I have a

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:18:11:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:12:41AM +0100: Not that I know, but it is quite dangerous to talk about Outlook in the context of mail clients. Oh, it is a mail client, it's just

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:02:17:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the message is. As your X-Uptime header which could be - at least - at bit more

Re: setting content type in email header with mutt

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:23:06:PM -0800 Gary Johnson wrote: I'm in a similar situation where I need to periodically send to a distribution list a document written in Word and would like to send it with a text/plain version as multipart/alternative. Nothing I have done to edit the

Re: Incredimail CRLF encoding

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:39:49:PM + Simon White wrote: So, since I'm hopeless with encoding, can someone tell me if I can filter these people's mail in the pager so I don't have to keep asking them to plaintext? set display_filter=~/.mutt/scripts/displayfilter ,[ displayfilter

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:14:14:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 07:58:17PM +0100: At the very least, it doesn't read RFC1521-compliant mails as recommended in the standard. Which has status informational only. Ok

Re: mailers with scripting/setup language

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:25:21:AM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:04:14AM +0100: Just wondering why 1524 is so important to you... You lost me. You lost me. We lost us. ;-) To the best of my knowledge, I have never

Re: mailbox question - mutt is *not* a filter!

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:40:23:PM +0100 Sven Guckes wrote: * Matthias Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-26 06:50]: Then I have a question regarding address books - is there support for something alike in mutt?? use addressbook I recommend using 'lbdb' ('little brother database').

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:56:57:PM +0100 Martin Karlsson wrote: * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-25 19.58 +0100]: ;-) It seems that Outlook users get along with one another so everything works as intended. And now all Solaris-users can enjoy the MS Outlook Express-experience

Command expansion

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, I send this to the user's list and not to developer's because I do not want to 'spam' anybody. The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time in the file I specify by the 'record' variable.

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:38:10:PM + Simon White wrote: If you use L (default mapping) to reply to lists, you will always reply just to the list address, as long as it is defined as a list in your muttrc. The reply-to should then be redundant, because people /should/ just reply to

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:31:43:PM +0100 Marco Fioretti wrote: Here where I work we use Ultra sparc machines, but have no root password and only 100 MB of quota = can't compile and install stuff, and are forbidden to do so: this situation is much more frequent than many Unix guru expect,

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-03-26 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote: Text based rules, Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-) but in Solaris you are stuck with CDE anyway, it's not worth shit

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:02:31:PM -0500 darren chamberlain wrote: I think if you \ the backticks, they will be evaluated when the variable is read, and not when the config is read. So, instead of: set record=`date +'%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M'` use something like: set record=\`date

Re: Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:08:33:PM + Sean Rima wrote: I cannot see any details howto change the current Group or even change back to the list of active groups when using Mutt/NNTP Probably does depend on the patch. Which one do you use? I use the vvv.nntp patch. Just move around as

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:29:58:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few % dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time Heh. And you talk about not wanting to spam! :-) You're lucky. I'm too

Re: ignore command does not seem to work

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:57:23:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: A lot of people on this list and others have creative X- headers that I enjoy reading. It's just as much a part of the email as the body of the message is. As your X-Uptime header

Re: substituing ~l in send-hook

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:03:43:AM +0100 Hanspeter Roth wrote: On Mar 26 at 20:38, Rocco Rutte spoke: Yes, but some people on other lists do not use mutt and/or not L. As I create the 'subscribe' entries for mutt's config by a script I also create folder-hooks to set Reply

smime_keys

2002-03-29 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hey, I finally had some time to left to set up S/MIME with Mutt 1.5.0 on Debian and FreeBSD. According to the documentation, I initially try to run 'smime_keys init'. The sample smime.rc is sourced in .muttrc, OpenSSL is installed on both systems. In fact, on FreeBSD (and this is extraordinary

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-03-29 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each other, or do even they have problems? ,[ /home/pdmef/.gnupg/options ]- | | # Options for

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:16:13:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: In Computer Science I spent two terms on creating a website on something dealing with new media (okay, surfing all the time and hacking it together in 1/2 day before deadline). Others

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:36:41:AM + Simon White wrote: Computer courses should teach about computers, not some proprietary software guff. Doesn't have to be programming, but how about file systems, and troubleshooting procedures? Troubleshooting is part of what I think makes most

Re: Display Error Redux

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: set pgp_verify_command=gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --verify %s %f set pgp_getkeys_command=gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose --batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r [...] I neither see

Re: Display Error Redux

2002-03-30 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 02:11:21PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: Rocco Rutte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I only have: set pgp_getkeys_command=gpg --batch --recv-keys %r /dev/null 21 I just have a keyserver in my options file and pgp_getkeys_command= gpg will fetch any key

Re: OT: OS definition thread

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:51:00:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Well, every high school in north america would have you think that without a start button, a computer is completely useless and broken. I'm pretty sure that the school I went to still has those 286 Siemens machines with

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:03:38:AM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100: Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my prompt to 'user@machine' it says that only root may run 'uname'. My response: 'exit'. Did you

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:17:05:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: Matthew, et al -- ...and then Matthew D. Fuller said... % I think he actually means 'hostname', not 'uname'; hostname, on any sane % system, displays the hostname when called with no args, and tries to set I agree so far, but

Re: Changing Groups in Mutt/NNTP

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 11:25:18:AM + Sean Rima wrote: Sorry should have said but yes it is the vvv patch, so thanks a million :) No problem. Pressing '?' for help every now and then will list which key is currently available with description. Rocco msg26478/pgp0.pgp

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:18:15:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % The following doesn't work, too: % % set record='`date +/tmp/%H%M%S`' Oh, I get it -- $record is only parsed once, so it will only be set once, no matter what. Exactly. % What I thought

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 06:49:32:AM -0600 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:08:50AM + I heard the voice of Dave Smith, and lo! it spake thus: On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just logged into a solaris box. Having set my

Re: M$ Outhouse E. for UNIX

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:12:56:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: Eh? Who the heck set up your box? An administrator, maybe. ;-) Rocco msg26481/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Irony getting in the way (Was: Re: ignore...)

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:07:07:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! Martin Karlsson spake thus: Rob, your X-Uptime header shows even the no. of hundreds odf seconds; I think Rocco ironically suggests that it perhaps could be more specific - meaning that he thinks it is _very_

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:14:23:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % There's more than one keyserver network. So it seems. Are there just one or two, or are there a bunch, or does anyone really know? Do the servers in a given network synchronize with each

smime_keys

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hey, I finally had some time to left to set up S/MIME with Mutt 1.5.0 on Debian and FreeBSD. According to the documentation, I initially try to run 'smime_keys init'. The sample smime.rc is sourced in .muttrc, OpenSSL is installed on both systems. In fact, on FreeBSD (and this is extraordinary

Re: X-Mailer header

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:17:46:PM -0500 David Collantes wrote: [ Mutt doesn't set X-Mailer ] This is just a kind of advertising. If you'd like you can create one with a simple my_hdr command like this one: folder . my_hdr X-Mailer: Mutt/$version How to grep the version number out of

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:13:16:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... By the way, I find myself wondering how you tell mutt to not quote blank lines as you have here. Or do you have an editor startup command that changes all '^ $' to '' for you

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:38:46:PM +0200 Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-27 16:35:14 +0100]: [...] So, as I said, a general solution. Sounds nice, at least to me. But $signature is of type path. You can use a pipe there right now, but the behaviour

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:25:20PM +0100: ... but it doesn't help at all if people don't submit their key because of paranoia. What's most annoying are the folks who not only don't

Re: Irony getting in the way (Was: Re: ignore...)

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:54:17:PM -0800 Will Yardley wrote: Rocco Rutte wrote: At least it was the smiley after your question which confused me. As I read you use a linux from scratch. Are you sure it looks professional advertising uptimes of 1 or 2 hours? ;-) he has

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200: Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote: ^ Is that a stylistic

Re: Irony getting in the way

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:26:05:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: It'd be easier to just make /proc/uptime writable... Yeah, but you would have to ... (Yes, I'm aware that requires a code change, not just chmod. Every time I say this I get some idiot pointing this out to me, like I didn't

Re: Irony getting in the way

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:08:37:PM -0700 Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: It may sound funny, but I really saw some Linux guys talking about what would be necessary to replace a kernel 'on the fly'. Didn't that happen on this mailing list? If not, I must

Re: gpg-key probs

2002-04-02 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [04/02/02 01:12:14] wrote: Alas! Rocco Rutte spake thus: On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:18:29:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:02:23PM +0200: On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:07:58:PM -0500 ShRen McMahon wrote

Re: change $record based on mailboxes - copy+save_name

2002-04-03 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Jun Sun [04/04/02 04:57:13] wrote: Don't you think it is a common sense to save a copy of outgoing message to the *same* folder as you are reading from? No, not really. Why should I do this? Unless there's something important in a folder I delete everything if I leave it. Otherwise I

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
. Are you really sure about that one? I currently have: ,[ ~/.mutt/setup/folder-hooks ]- | | folder-hook . 'my_hdr Reply-To: Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED]' | [...] | folder-hook =IN.mutt-users 'my_hdr Reply-To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' | `- ... in that order and it works. It shouldn't work

Re: language-problem - no locales files foo.mo

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Heiko Heil [04/04/02 19:00:52] wrote: On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:30:35PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: and next thing you know it'll be handbuch handbuch instead of man man. no thanks. Hey, sometimes it would be really funny! Think of this one: 'katze mahlzeit katzeklo' ;-)) I love

Re: PGP Signing and Password

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04/04/02 23:04:41] wrote: I have just got GNUPG working with Mutt, and since I am still new to Mutt and PGP I am very impressed. Fine. However by default (my choice), I now sign all outgoing emails (including this one I hope), I have increased the timeout threshold

Re: language-problem - krauts and kittys

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Sven Guckes [04/05/02 18:32:12] wrote: * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-04 19:45]: I love silly translations. Yesterday I worked with a german Red Hat-distribution (user elvis): Gnome created an icon called Heimat von elvis Why not: Gnome hat eine Ikone namens 'Heimat

Re: OT: language-problem - krauts and kittys

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Simon White [04/05/02 19:18:44] wrote: 05-Apr-02 at 18:32, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Pfeife zerbrochen Broken pipe, I suppose. Yes. Just like the dumb lady I was talking to once, who told me she was airing her room when I told her to close the window. ;-)) Via

Re: .muttrc variables

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David Collantes [04/05/02 19:22:13] wrote: [ dump config ] Will this be useful to more people? Is it something worth to ask as a wish? For me, it will be nice it I could: $ mutt --dump-vars And have a .muttrc-full some something dumped on my directory, with all options and their

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Jim MacBaine [04/05/02 23:52:27 CEST] wrote: I'm regularly recieving perl and java programs and I have to sort out the good from the bad. Your boss doesn't seem to like you? ,-) Right now I'm using mutt and use a mailcap entry to open the attachments in NEdit to have the syntax

Re: un-alternates?

2002-04-06 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [04/06/02 23:48:54 CEST] wrote: Well obviously the only solution here is to register a second domain and tell your wife and kids that their new email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and whatever else for your kids), then the 'justpick' thing will only match your address

Re: Received header field

2002-04-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * José Romildo Malaquias [04/07/02 14:17:07 CEST] wrote: Why mutt (1.3.27) is not showing the Received fields from the header of the messages? How can I configure it to show those fields? Try pressing 'h' and look at the manual for 'ignore' and 'unignore'. HTH, Cheers, Rocco.

Re: un-alternates?

2002-04-08 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David Champion [04/09/02 00:40:53 CEST] wrote: [ regular expressions in mutt ] But can we assume that perl is the same? Not until quite long test runs. I don't believe that we can. That's the essence of the question; unfortunately it needs someone who's been paying attention to code

Re: Preferred muttrc syntax for set commands

2002-04-09 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Michael Tatge [04/09/02 15:42:25 CEST] wrote: Who needs urlview? I like using it because I hate copy'n'paste. I also don't like to idea to use a mouse as frequently as urlview. ;-) Cheers, Rocco. msg26921/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PGP: macro to fetch keys from keyserver?

2002-04-10 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Andre Berger [04/10/02 20:14:51 CEST] wrote: I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from signed messages, like gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY But how can I get/define $KEY? It depends on what your goal is. If you want gpg to

Re: PGP: macro to fetch keys from keyserver?

2002-04-10 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/10/02 19:37:40 CEST] wrote: ...and then Andre Berger said... % I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from % signed messages, like % % gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY % % But how can I get/define $KEY? Why reinvent the

NFS problems

2002-04-10 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, I just started another attempt to get mutt 1.5 working at one of my accounts. Without any sucess so far. Hopefully someone can help. The situation so far is that sending mail doesn't work because mutt does not show up again after returning from the editor (saving works). I try to summarize

Re: Setting of config var only temporarly

2002-04-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Michael Tatge [04/11/02 11:10:25 CEST] wrote: Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific email to be send? I want: pgp_create_traditionl=no ... send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA therefor

Re: [OT] cc: poster vs reply-only-to-list

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Simon White [04/11/02 19:46:13 CEST] wrote: 11-Apr-02 at 12:21, David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : I always hit L to reply to lists, and hope that Mutt will reply as intended. This usually means a CC: to the person that posted as long as they set up their headers that way. The

Re: NFS problems

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David DeSimone [04/13/02 01:40:19 CEST] wrote: Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The situation so far is that sending mail doesn't work because mutt does not show up again after returning from the editor (saving works). Use 'strace' to watch the mutt process and log system

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * s. keeling [04/13/02 02:10:27 CEST] wrote: That's the background. So in my ~/.mailcap, I tried links %s; copiousoutput: [-- Autoview using /usr/bin/links '/home/keeling/.mutt/tmp/mutt9aipDt' --] [-- Autoview stderr of /usr/bin/links '/home/keeling/.mutt/tmp/mutt9aipDt' --]

Re: HTML Mail

2002-04-12 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * s. keeling [04/13/02 03:11:49 CEST] wrote: On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: Try 'w3m -dump' for autoview. Thanks Rocco. Problem solved. Much appreciated. No problem. I didn't mention the manpages for those 3 text-mode browsers. Maybe you should

Re: NFS problems

2002-04-13 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Aaron Schrab [04/13/02 19:31:32 CEST] wrote: I don't know why this would happen with glibc, but with dietlibc the st_size element of struct stat is unsigned, so unless it hits 0 exactly the test will always succeed. As I said, it happened in both cases: statically linked against glibc

Re: NFS problems

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Aaron Schrab [04/14/02 01:20:38 CEST] wrote: The patch shouldn't affect security in any way. Temporary files are still overwritten, I just added a test for when the entire file has been overwritten that will work properly on systems where the size returned by the stat system call is

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 05:41]: I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? Must be you. Verified here. Cheers, Rocco. msg27139/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

PGP signature verification (was: Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem)

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 13:12:18 CEST] wrote: * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 12:17]: * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 05:41]: I cannot verify your signature. Is it you or is it me? Must be you. Verified here. I

Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?: Formail problem

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/14/02 16:54:58 CEST] wrote: ...and then Thorsten Haude said... % * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 12:17]: % * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 11:28:59 CEST] wrote: % * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 05:41]: % I cannot verify your signature. Is it you

Re: PGP signature verification

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 15:13]: Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your $pgp_verify_command look like? gpg --no-verbose --quiet --batch -o - --verify %s %f Except '--quiet' the same here. As I said

Re: S/MIME

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/13/02 10:41:21 CEST] wrote: I want to get a better picture about S/MIME, but can't find an introduction in the net. Could one of you point me to a S/MIME introduction or tutorial that is written for the user? The Linux Security HowTo just points to one of Netscapes

Re: PGP signature verification

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 23:06:03 CEST] wrote: * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 22:46]: * Thorsten Haude [04/14/02 21:41:00 CEST] wrote: * Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-14 15:13]: Hmm, checked them and both verify. What does your $pgp_verify_command look like

Re: PGP signature verification

2002-04-14 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Thorsten Haude [04/15/02 00:53:17 CEST] wrote: * Thorsten Haude [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-04-15 00:41]: I cannot verify (April only): With neither 1.5.0 nor 1.3.27 (except for S/MIME of course). Exactly. But only checking David's. -- Alles ist richtig, auch das Gegenteil. - Kurt

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >