genberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sub:u:2048:16:9B31F5CACA634208:2000-12-01::79::
HTH mh
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Linux - millions served - just today
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 06:48:11PM +0100, Martin wrote:
On Wednesday, December 06, 2000 (CS:3.49.341) 22:54:19 [PM] (-0200)
Rod Pike [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote...
What version of pgp are you using? I don't get a list of keys.
AISB im not using pgp at all. gpg works fine for me
et | grep www | grep us | awk '{print $1}'`.
Thorsten
PGP signature
I applied this patch by Aaron Schrab, and now mutt generates a top-level
Content-Trasfer-Encoding header. This makes courier leave the message
unmolested, and my PGP signatures verify correctly! Thanks Aaron.
--- sendlib.c.dist Tue Dec 5 12:31:21 2000
+++ sendlib.c Tue Dec 5 14:32:25
On Wednesday, December 06, 2000 (CS:3.49.341) 22:54:19 [PM] (-0200)
Rod Pike [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote...
What version of pgp are you using? I don't get a list of keys.
AISB im not using pgp at all. gpg works fine for me!
I create a mail and use the "p" commmand to give me the
possession."
Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96 2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/35A1C149
PGP signature
On 2000-12-05 15:49:53 +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
So the problem boils down to the MUA not generating full and
correct MIME headers. In this case, mutt isn't inserting all the
headers that courier expects (it assumes that the relevant
information will be infered according to RFC 1847).
Hi,
Martin wrote:
keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
This option is commented out by default. You have to uncomment it to use it.
It works for your mail, so I take it. Thanks!
Thorsten
PGP signature
On 2000-12-05 17:23:30 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Well, I really think it's not really the MUA, but it's PGP/MIME
that's broken.
As would be S/MIME (that stuff used by Outlook and Netscape). Sam,
I'd seriously suggest that, for the time being, you just implement
the standards which
, and some pgpX.rc files.
You only have to source the right file to your muttrc (see the
mutt manual for that)
I wish it were that simple. I've been trying to get PGP 6.5.8 working
with limited success. I source the pgp6.rc and am able to decrypt mails
but when I try to encrypt and send I
that the relevant information will be infered according
to RFC 1847). I suppose mutt's interpretation of the RFC is understandable.
Anyway, the result is that a user has to go to extra effort to make sure
that PGP/MIME messages are correctly encoded, to avoid changes along the
way. I just don't want
,7 +433,10 @@
fputc ('\n', f);
- if (a-encoding != ENC7BIT)
+ /* Courier MTA will rewrite messages that don't contain an explicit
+ * Content-Transfer-Encoding, breaking PGP/MIME signatures. */
+ if (a-encoding != ENC7BIT
+ || (a-type == TYPEMULTIPART mutt_strcmp(a-subtype, &quo
--recv-keys %r"
not work?
Thorsten
PGP signature
have to uncomment it to use it.
HTH mh
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Linux - Use the force of 32bit
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PGP signature
to your muttrc (see the
mutt manual for that)
I wish it were that simple. I've been trying to get PGP 6.5.8 working
with limited success. I source the pgp6.rc and am able to decrypt mails
but when I try to encrypt and send I am continually asked for the keyID
for the recipient who is in my
hi,
Am I the only feel the PGP output too long?
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Dec 1 18:58:06 2000) --]
signature not checked.
Signature made 2000/11/28 20:13 GMT
key does not meet validity threshold.
WARNING: Because this public key is not certified with a trusted
signature
patch pgp.c as follows:
--
comment line 582, 585 and 586. write a short function will be called
before line 582:
void cleanOUT (FILE *pgpout, STATE *s)
{
char buf[1024];
size_t l, i;
int find = 0;
if ( (l = fread (buf, 1, sizeof(buf),
Monday, November 27, 2000 (CS:1.48.332) 03:39:17 [AM] (+0100)
Daniel González Gasull [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote...
Hi all!
I've created a Perl script to filter old style PGP
messages with procmail. It converts to
application/pgp or application/pgp-keys, any PGP
message, any PGP key
Well, I have been trying to configuring Mutt with PGP and I have
not succeed as of yet. Can anyone submit the relevant commands
from their muttrc or some other file so I can get this to work.
Also, how would I send me pgp key to a server so others can
verify it? Last thing would be how do I
On Friday, December 01, 2000 (CS:5.48.336) 15:24:57 [PM] (-0500)
Eric Ekong [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote...
Well, I have been trying to configuring Mutt with PGP and I have
not succeed as of yet. Can anyone submit the relevant commands
from their muttrc or some other file so I can get
hi,
Am I the only one who feels the PGP output too long?
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Dec 1 18:58:06 2000) --]
signature not checked.
Signature made 2000/11/28 20:13 GMT
key does not meet validity threshold.
WARNING: Because this public key is not certified with a trusted
On 2000-11-24 08:02:35 -0600, Scott Davis wrote:
when I cat filename on this FreeBSD box, it is all garbled... nothing
readable.
Try typing "pgpring -2", and extract the part of the output which
looks like it's related to you.
--
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Gonz?lez Gasull wrote:
: Hello. I want to know how to compose plain PGP
: messages within Mutt. Can it be done without any
: script?
If you use only ASCII (7 bit) characters then:
set pgp_create_traditional
For messages what contain 8bit data Mutt ignore settings
Hi!
I have installed Pretty Good Privacy 2.6.3i on this FreeBSD box and all
went well. I am trying to integrate it into Mutt 1.2.5i, and that seems
to go 99% ok. The problem I have is this:
I created a key for myself on this machine using 'pgp -kg'
When I go to use Mutt, send mail to myself
On 2000-11-24 04:31:12 -0600, Scott Davis wrote:
I created a key for myself on this machine using 'pgp -kg'
What's your key ID looking like?
Thomas Roessler filled my mailbox with:
I created a key for myself on this machine using 'pgp -kg'
What's your key ID looking like?
when I cat filename on this FreeBSD box, it is all garbled... nothing
readable.
-=*=-
Scott A. Davis...[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Austin, Texas
Hi !
O.K. I've got PGP running on my workstation and want
to use it together with mutt now.
Has anyone get this running ?
I can send mail using:
set pgp_encrypt_only_command="pgp +verbose=0 +batchmode -et - %r"
But the decryption is not running :-/
set pgp_decrypt_command="PGPP
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 08:19:33PM +0100, Marc Richter wrote:
Hi !
O.K. I've got PGP running on my workstation and want
to use it together with mutt now.
Has anyone get this running ?
I can send mail using:
set pgp_encrypt_only_command="pgp +verbose=0 +batchmode -et
Hi all,
We are in the middle of a mini-battle over PGP/GPG in my office. Having done
a bit of reading it appears that Mutt behaves correctly in dealing with
encrypted and signed messages and that Outlook and many other mailers do
not.
However, I am--at the moment--the only mutt user
On 2000-11-14 10:13:40 -0800, Timothy Grant wrote:
I realize that there are a couple of procmail recipes that will
fix incoming messages. However, is my only option on outgoing
messages to clearsign? Is it possible to determine who gets
clearsigned messages and who gets PGP/MIMED messages
calls PGP to verify a message's signature, it screws up the display.
I've used the settings documented in the contrib directory for pgp 6, and
it's working fine except for the display problem. I have to do a ^L after
every message checked by PGP.
There *is* an error which flashes by pretty
I am currently using the following two macros to do things with unknown
PGP/GPG key ids:
macro pager P "!gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.us.pgp.net --recv-key 0x" "Get PGP
Key"
macro pager L "!gpg --lsign-key 0x" "Sign PGP Key"
Is there a way to automatically ge
The "S" macro which I found in the documentation/FAQ isn't working for me
(in Mutt v1.2.5). Here's what I have:
macro compose S "Fpgp +verbose=0 -fast +clearsig=on\ny^T^Uapplication/pgp;
format=text; x-action=sign\ny"
The ^T^U etc. never gets executed. It justs runs the P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just upgraded to Mutt 1.2.5 and I'm having some display problems... When
Mutt calls PGP to verify a message's signature, it screws up the display.
I've used the settings documented in the contrib directory for pgp 6, and
it's working fine except
I use pgp-hook to define a key for an email address:
pgp-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ABCD1234
I also tell mutt to always encrypt to this address:
send-hook . set pgp_autoencrypt=no
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] set pgp_autoencrypt=yes
When I send a message to this email address, mutt
On Wednesday, 25.10.2000 at 21:24 -0400, Josh Huber wrote:
...
Another (completely unrelated) question I had was regarding the PGP
support. I've been using it for a while now, but I'd like to have
some way to select a key for encryption automatically. Well, it does
already do that, but I
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:51:42AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
I've posted about this in the past, and I don't think I've ever seen any
suggestions, macros, or workarounds for this problem ... Even if you
specify the key-ID to use in a "pgp-hook", it _still_ gives you this
prompt, w
I have a number of contacts that are unable or unwilling to upgrade
to GPG or PGP 2.6.*. This means that they must use RSA and IDEA. While
GPG now speaks RSA, and can be patched to support IDEA (though I have yet
to get this to work, as I haven't had the time to get all of the source
hit ctrl-f, if that happens first) so I'd think it wouldn't
be too much troublee...
% Wenn I open a pgp encrypted message mutt still asks me for the
% passphrase. This is not necessary, because pgp looks automatically for
% the PGPPASS environment variable.
That it does, but I again wonder why
automatically knows which key to sign
with, and asks me for my passphrase.
The problem is when sending messages. I use pgp-hook and send-hook
to have mutt automatically encrypt for certain email addresses:
pgp-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12345678
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] set pgp_autoencrypt=yes
Hi,
I've been testing Mutt, trying to get it quite close to what I'm used to w/
Pine.
One question about PGP; I get the following at the top of the PGP messages:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Oct 20 23:04:51 2000) --]
cut gpg messages
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following
I'm setting the passphrase via the PGPPASS environment variable before starting
mutt.
Wenn I open a pgp encrypted message mutt still asks me for the
passphrase. This is not necessary, because pgp looks automatically for
the PGPPASS environment variable.
So, how do I disable this function in mutt
I'm running mutt-1.2.5i that I installed as an RPM on RH 6.2.
I am trying to get it working with PGP 6.5.8.
I've sourced the pgp6.rc from the mutt-1.2.5/contrib directory.
I made a link from /usr/bin/pgp to /usr/bin/pgp6.
I'm able to decrypt mails sent to me after making the appropriate change
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 11:13:26PM +, Jan- Hendrik Palic wrote:
I generated a new key and I I wanted to send me a test mail with a sign.
In the send- menu of mutt, I hit p to use the pgp- feature in mutt and s to
sign.
When I hit y to send the mail, pgp wants me enter the passphrase
Mutt can remember the pgp passphrase once it is entered by the user.
How does mutt passes the phrase over to pgp when en-/decrypting a message?
Is there an algorithm that checks for the pgp passphrase input message
and sends it as stdin ?
Daniel.
Daniel Kollar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
The passphrase is sent via the command
cat %?p?-?
I'm not a unix expert. Can anyone explain these quotation marks (?),
please?
Can this %?p? be used in the mailcap file?
I need to send the passphrase to mutt_octet-filter.
I'm
hi all,
if i put "pgp-hook pattern id" in my config, mutt is asking
me to use id X for pattern Y. this is very useful. but why
is he giving me a list of the keys after that ? i already set this hook
so he should use this specified key. this is very annoying :)
can anyone help
that this is the same for pgp:
%pThe empty string when no passphrase is needed,
the string "PGPPASSFD=0" if one is needed.
Obviouly this %p is a mutt expando. You can't use outside mutt.
HTH,
Michael
--
Using TSO is like kicking a dead whale down the beach.
-- S.C. Jo
Hi to all...
sorry, this question is asked many time I thing
I had read the documentation for mutt and pgp more or less and I installed
pgp-2.6.3-i on my debian- mashine.
I generated a new key and I I wanted to send me a test mail with a sign.
In the send- menu of mutt, I hit p to use
Hello,
I'm trying to get PGP 6.5.2 working with mutt. I downloaded the pgp6.rc
file and am sourcing it in my .muttrc. Everything seems to work up to the
point where I choose the keyID for the user, then it bombs. Here is the
message it outputs:
-- Mutt: PGP keys matching [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
I'm trying to get PGP 6.5.2 working with mutt. I downloaded the pgp6.rc
file and am sourcing it in my .muttrc. Everything seems to work up to the
point where I choose the keyID for the user, then it bombs. Here is the
message it outputs:
-- Mutt: PGP keys matching [EMAIL PROTECTED
hi all,
i have running mutt1.2.5i and gpg 1.0.1. when i encrypt and sign a message
mutt is exporting the mail like this:
Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; protocol="application/pgp-encrypted";
boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
this is
1.0.1. when i encrypt and sign a message
% mutt is exporting the mail like this:
%
% Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; protocol="application/pgp-encrypted";
% boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
% Content-Disposition: inline
Oh, you mean the right way. Of course!
%
% this is
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Marco, check out pgp_create_traditional in the manual. I won't tell
you anything else because I don't want to further contribute to your
delinquency ;-)
Suresh Mrinal co, this *definitely* needs to go into the mutt-newbie
FAQ. This seems to
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Marco, check out pgp_create_traditional in the manual. I won't tell
you anything else because I don't want to further contribute to your
delinquency ;-)
Suresh Mrinal co, this *definitely* needs to go into the mutt-newbie
FAQ. This seems to
Uncle!!!
Ok I'm a newbie as far as mutt goes but I'm willing to pay my pound of flesh cause I
know it'll be worth it.
I'm running mutt-1.2.5i-1 that I installed as an RPM on RH 6.2. It seems to be
working more of less with my IMAP server. I am trying to get it working with PGP
6.5.8. I've
Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0.
PGP signature
, then! ;-)
% mutt then sends the mail like this:
%
% Content-Type: application/pgp; x-action=encrypt; format=text
% Content-Disposition: inline; filename="msg.pgp"
%
% but i don´t want application/pgp.. i want something like this:
%
% Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
% Conten
] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0.
PGP signature
People are complaining to me that my pgp signatures show up as unidentified attachments
which freaks them out (MS users). Is there a way to force the signature to identify
itself
as being what it is?
I also know a few outlook users which say that my signed messages turn up as a blank
message
Hi,
do you remember that I asked for a recursive MIME attachment recognition in mutt?
The problem was, that I often receive MIME attachment as octet-stream which are PGP
encrypted HTML pages.
What I need is an octet-filter, which recognizes the pgp encryption, starts the
decryption, recognizes
Hi,
do you remember that I asked for a recursive MIME attachment recognition in mutt?
The problem was, that I often receive MIME attachment as octet-stream which are PGP
encrypted HTML pages.
What I need is an octet-filter, which recognizes the pgp encryption, starts the
decryption, recognizes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:24:34AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Since you're using gpg.rc, just make sure that pgp_clearsign_command
(see 6.3.120) is set correctly and then set pgp_create_traditional
(see 6.3.115) and you're off (but we'll all
On Sun 10/08/00 at 08:07 PM -0400, Russell Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know why this error messages appears whenever I try to
mail my key with ESC-k in the compose menu?
[-- Attachment #2: PGP Key 0xFC5C7370. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0K
Emre --
...and then emre said...
% Hi,
%
% I'm using mutt-1.2.5i with the gpg.rc stuff in my ~/.muttrc. My
% question is:
% Is there a way to make mutt not attach PGP signed/encrypted files?
Yes.
% My old MUA would insert the signed text right into the message
% with the "BEGIN PGP S
Does anyone know why this error messages appears whenever I try to
mail my key with ESC-k in the compose menu?
[-- Attachment #2: PGP Key 0xFC5C7370. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0K --]
[-- Error: could not find beginning of PGP message
I've recently started to use GnuPG 1.0.1 with mutt 1.2i. I notice a small
problem:
1. If I receive a message with a PGP signature attached, and view it with
mutt, gpg claims that it's a bad signature, even if the signature is good,
in certain circumstances. In particular, this happens
Anand Buddhdev [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I've recently started to use GnuPG 1.0.1 with mutt 1.2i. I notice a small
problem:
1. If I receive a message with a PGP signature attached, and view it with
mutt, gpg claims that it's a bad signature, even if the signature is good,
in certain
On 2000-10-03 01:45:02 +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
Can you explain what do you mean? app/pgp is Content-Type;
but what is PGP/MIME? And is it the way decide my problem?
PGP/MIME is what mutt uses to send pgp-encrypted and -signed
messages. The idea is basically this: You take
I know know PGP stuff is supposed to be specified via MIME headers. I'm
just not sure which technique is best. Mutt is attaching a Content-Type
header like this:
Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; protocol="application/pgp-encrypted";
boundary="FoLtEtfbNGMjfgrs"
Content
, you might find it
handy to set $pgp_create_traditional via a send-hook; instead of creating
a MIME-attached signature of the MIME-attached body, mutt will have pgp
sign the body in armored form and use the whole thing as the text body,
which LookOut! and other broken can then understand.
:-D
Bya godzina 21:43:20 w wtorek 26 wrzesie, gdy do autobusu wsiad kanar
i wrzasn:"Dan Boger!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
Set your mutt/gpg to automatically get keys from a keyserver (like
wwwkeys.pgp.net) and then when it encounters a key it doesn't know, it'll
try and get it
I heard that people have troubles with public PGP key service.
That's why I'd like to introduce the way I did it myself.
I hope that this info will be helpful for someone.
--
1) In ~/.procmailrc:
:0
one honest man a century.
No fences?|
No Gates necessary. |
PGP signature
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 02:37:39AM +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
P.S. There are two things I still can't understand.
1) Why do people post here signed messages. I think there's no need in it.
because a lot of people (me included) have mutt sign their messages
automatically, and often don't
Bya godzina 23:09:13 w roda 20 wrzesie, gdy do autobusu wsiad kanar
i wrzasn:"Eugene Paskevich!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
P.S. How can I include cookies from fortune for example into my signature?
Answer directly please.
I am sorry but i only know how to answer the
Using a large mallet, Lukasz Stelmach whacked out:
By³a godzina 23:09:13 w ¶roda 20 wrzesieñ, gdy do autobusu wsiad³ kanar
i wrzasn±³:"Eugene Paskevich!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
P.S. How can I include cookies from fortune for example into my signature?
Answer
The address [EMAIL PROTECTED] is preferred over [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000.09.20, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Eugene Paskevich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. How can I include cookies from fortune for example into my signature?
Answer directly please.
You probably missed the other
Hello Mutt Users!
On pi 22 wrz 2000 08:54:44 GMT Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
at the very end of message and type:
:$!/usr/games/fortune -s
... or use this little shell script -
Or better use some program such as signature, which creates a FIFO and
passes output of given program to
That's very nice but I'd like my signature to be changed every time
I compose a new message. Not every session of mutt.
--
Eugene Paskevich | *==(--- |"Alrighty then!"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ---)==* | -- Ace Venture
Publ
On 22-Sep-2000, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
That's very nice but I'd like my signature to be changed every time
I compose a new message. Not every session of mutt.
It's hinted in the manual.
set signature = "program_that_generates_random_sig|"
Notice the vertical bar at the
/mutt/
--
I've never had major knee surgery on any other part of my body.
- Winston Bennett, University of Kentucky basketball forward
Robert I. Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/
PGP Key: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/pgp.html
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 08:57:09PM +0300, Eugene Paskevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's very nice but I'd like my signature to be changed every time
I compose a new message. Not every session of mutt.
If you read the manual, you'll discover that if $signature ends with
a
"AG" == Anton Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AG (in fact GPG doesn't natively have support for the RSA keys PGP
AG 2.6.x uses).
There has been a module which allowed you to verify RSA keys for quite
some time. With the ending of patent on RSA, gpg now has internal RSA
suppo
that the module had now been incorporated into the official
builds. Time to upgrade to 1.0.3 :)
--
Anton GrahamGPG ID: 0x18F78541
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RSA key available upon request
Familiarity breeds contempt.
-- Publius Syrus (42 B.C.), Maxim 640
PGP
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 20 16:14:34 2000) --]
[-- End of
On 2000-09-21 00:57:06 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
[-- Error: unable to create PGP subprocess! --]
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
However, when replying, I could get the full text.
That's because, when replying, mutt doesn't even try to verify a
signature. Unsetting pgp_verify_sig
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 09:18 +0200, Rudi van Houten wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
[-- PGP output follows (current tim
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 09:18 +0200, Rudi van Houten wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
verified."?
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
it says) to "PGP signature could NOT be verified" when verifying THE
EXAC
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 13:47 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
it says) to &quo
Hi to all...
I'm a mutt newbe and I do not have read all of the Docu yet...
I installed pgp 2.6.3.i on debian 2.2 with dpkg -i an I allready have a
generated key.
But, always, when I'm reading messages from mua's with pgp-support, I see
this:
--
ERROR: Header line added to ASCII armor
Submitted 21-Sep-00 by Jan- Hendrik Palic:
I'm a mutt newbe and I do not have read all of the Docu yet...
Hidee :)
ERROR: Header line added to ASCII armor: "Hash: SHA1"
ASCII armor corrupted.
Correct. Newer versions of PGP and GPG add a line to identify the hash
used. 2.6.x a
What does mutt look for in order to decide that a message is encrypted?
My boss is sending me messages encrypted using Outlook's PGP plugin and
they're showing up as plain text. If I pipe 'em out to "gpg --decrypt"
the decrypt fine, but since mutt thinks they are plain text the decry
r decoding messages on-the-fly.
The problem is:
If I recieve a normal text in charset which was hooked in .muttrc
everything decodes just fine. But in case of encrypted PGP message
which originally was in other CP than Koi8 then it just decrypts and
doesn't send it to decoder of CP's.
Ben --
...and then Ben Beuchler said...
% What does mutt look for in order to decide that a message is encrypted?
Check out the PGP-Notes file in the doc and implement the procmail rule
specified therein.
% My boss is sending me messages encrypted using Outlook's PGP plugin and
Oh, yeah
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:33:10PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
...and then Ben Beuchler said... % What does mutt look for in order
to decide that a message is encrypted?
Check out the PGP-Notes file in the doc and implement the procmail
rule specified therein.
I went the maildrop route
To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 20 16:14:34 2000) --]
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is PGP/MIME encrypted --]
blah
[-- End o
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 21:59:05 +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
[snip]
In the pager, I only get the following two lines:
[-- Error: unable to create PGP subprocess! --]
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
However, when replying, I could get the full text.
--
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 01:47:50AM -0700, Shane Wegner wrote:
I wrote a patch for mutt and outlook a week or so ago.
Applying it and setting pgp_outlook_compat to yes or ask
should work.
The traditional mode in mutt still sets the Content-type to
application/pgp or the like and Outlook
801 - 900 of 1369 matches
Mail list logo
