Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (22:02) :
The person was asking for a browser that could handle javascript. The
one you said was 'better' doesn't support Javascript, either.
No he didn't ask for that. He said he used lynx. I said w3m is better,
but it isn't when you use
Alas! Preben Randhol spake thus:
No he didn't ask for that. He said he used lynx. I said w3m is better,
but it isn't when you use the browser with a screenreader then lynx is
better.
He said I'm looking for a browser that supports javascript. I don't
know about you, but to me this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park blurted
He said I'm looking for a browser that supports javascript. I don't
know about you, but to me this is equivalent to What browsers support
javascript?
Is this thread still going? You two are like a couple
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:11:16PM -0500, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! Preben Randhol spake thus:
No he didn't ask for that. He said he used lynx. I said w3m is better,
but it isn't when you use the browser with a screenreader then lynx is
better.
He said I'm looking for a browser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Ross A. Osborn blurted
Is anybody else getting tired of this debate? Could you fellas take
this off-line somewhere?
No! Don't kill it now, I was there at the begining and I've come over
all parental at thought of killing such a
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (19:11) :
You're not responding to his question. (w3m doesn't do javascript
No I didn't say it did. I just said w3m is better than lynx.
tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
responded)
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you post comments it would be nice.
There were no
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:28:14PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Christian Schoepplein blurted
Is this because of the keystroke vs mouse click thing?
I've been using more and more console apps over the last few months and
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
responded)
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you
Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus:
Useful for what exactly? I don't really see anything useful below that I
couldn't find out simply by looking at your orignal message.
Yes, but the same could be said for all quoted text, so why quote at
all?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
An error?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park blurted
Yes, but the same could be said for all quoted text, so why quote at
all?
That's a good point!
A few people went a little 'foaming at the mouth' on this topic over tha
last few days but it all boils down
Alas! Preben Randhol spake thus:
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you post comments it would be nice.
There were no questions in that paragraph.
The person was asking for a browser that could handle javascript. The
one you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 09:17
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park said
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17 Brian Foley said
Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have
blasted you out of the water for: a) using a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 09:17
* Thomas Hurst said
_Replying to a message_
By: Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On: Monday, January 21, 2002, 16:54:47 -0700
Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 09:17
* Jonathan Irving said
Simple: defaults. Default behaviour is what most non-technical
users end up with. I've heard it called flashing 12:00
syndrome, referencing the inability of most over-12-year-olds to
program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 09:17
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park said
TheBat! is by far the best windows mail program I've seen (unless mutt
is available for windows and I don't know about it). It sure beats
Netscape Mail or LookOut, anyway.
Does it support
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [22-01-2002 09:20]:
Also, you could try to be creative with your attribution, like me
or others here.
I must admit to toying with several ideas but not coming up with
anything I was happy enough with yet. You're right about the one line
thing though and
Brian, et al --
...and then Brian Clark said...
%
% * Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 18:57]:
%
% Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
% think the idea is to choose something that identifies the person,
% like:
%
% Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Alas! Brian Clark spake thus:
%
% I've used clients like TheBat! before that do it as you've pointed out
% below:
%
% BCThis line is quoted text
% BCThis line is quoted text
%
% TheBat! is by far the best windows mail program I've seen
Derek --
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
%
o/
/o At some point hitherto, René Clerc hath spake thusly:
o/
/o I've finally come to my senses; changed from '| ' to ' '. Now it's up
o/
/o to that other pagan, David, to change ;)
O /
/
/ O
O /
/
/ O And there was much rejoicing... ;-)
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 22-01-02 at 09:17
% * Thomas Hurst said
%
% Like mine? It's only 6 lines, and it's *so* useful. Honest..
%
% I think yours might be just a little much, I'm getting my arse kicked
% here about trimming, a six line attribution? That's as
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/01/2002 (00:01) :
It seems they're all LookOut users as well. Where the heck people get
that crap is beyond me.
I thought the program was called LockOut ;-)
Another annoying thing is the 10 line disclaimer from companies that
this is a private e-mail
Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (22:12) :
You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
to just the relevant stuff is _more_ than outweghed by the time saved
to the list members as a whole, not to mention the readability of the
mail archives
* Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] [22-01-2002 12:13]:
Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (22:12) :
You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
to just the relevant stuff is _more_ than outweghed by the time saved
to the list members as a
René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/01/2002 (12:26) :
Apart from the useful links, you're missing the point. Cameron was
saying that the amount of time spent trimming is _outweighed_ by the
time saved. That means that he means that one _should_ trim!
This is not correct at all. It is
* Preben Randhol [EMAIL PROTECTED] [22-01-2002 12:28]:
René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/01/2002 (12:26) :
Apart from the useful links, you're missing the point. Cameron was
saying that the amount of time spent trimming is _outweighed_ by the
time saved. That means that he means
* On 22-01-02 at 12:28
* René Clerc said
Apart from the useful links, you're missing the point. Cameron was
saying that the amount of time spent trimming is _outweighed_ by the
time saved. That means that he means that one _should_ trim!
Thank god for that, I thought I was going mad :)
* On 22-01-02 at 12:43
* René Clerc said
Apart from the useful links, you're missing the point. Cameron was
saying that the amount of time spent trimming is _outweighed_ by the
time saved. That means that he means that one _should_ trim!
This is not correct at all. It is just
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (22:12) :
You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
to just the relevant stuff is _more_ than outweghed by the time saved
to the list members as a whole, not to
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 22. 2002 05:21]:
...and then Brian Clark said...
% Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact quote prefix* :-) It'd take me
% forever to find the thread in the archives because I wouldn't know
% what to look
Not so tough; just surf over to the archives site and
* Preben Randhol ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 22. 2002 06:07]:
Another annoying thing is the 10 line disclaimer from companies that
Especially when they are up top.
this is a private e-mail and that if you have gotten it should return
the e-mail to the company bla bla bla etc... I have always
Brian --
...and then Brian Clark said...
%
% * David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 22. 2002 05:21]:
%
% ...and then Brian Clark said...
%
% % Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact quote prefix* :-) It'd take me
% % forever to find the thread in the archives because I wouldn't know
% % what to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 15:06
* Brian Clark said
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 22. 2002 05:21]:
% for, but it was the thread where someone was picking on Dave's (%)
% quote prefix. (I gather this isn't the first time someone on the
%
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 22-01-02 at 15:06
% * Brian Clark said
%
% * David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 22. 2002 05:21]:
%
% % for, but it was the thread where someone was picking on Dave's (%)
% % quote prefix. (I gather this isn't the first time someone
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
Are you blind??
I'm /registered/ blind. But I see okay in reasonable light.
Good to know. Now I have to ask everybody else...
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
The Love Bird is 100% faithful to
Hi all!
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:43:40AM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
This is irrelevant. Over-quoting is inconsiderate, and affects
everyone. It causes us to have to wade through a bunch of irrelevant
garbage to get at (and often FIND) the author's point. Quoting out of
context (i.e.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 18:08
* Christian Schoepplein said
I agree 100%!!! To quote mails in the right way is helpful for anyboody
and not only for blind or visually handicapped persons. I'm a blind
computeruser and I get mor then 1000 mails the
And you can add hard coded font sizes in websites to that list, I know
you can overide stylesheets but it's annoying to have to go to such
lengths to read sites like cnn.com.
It's actually really easy to do in mozilla. Just add one line to your
prefs.js and you're done, forever. No recurring
* David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [22-01-02] wrote:
Hey! On whose side are you? Oh, the betrayal!
%
% --
%
% Nick Wilson
%
% Tel:+45 3325 0688
% Fax:+45 3325 0677
% Web:www.explodingnet.com
%
David,
Some people seem to be turning over a new leaf after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 15:58
* David T-G said
% Anyone remember the subject or something of that thread, I'd like to
% have a look at it.
The subject was 'Quoting when replying', and it got nasty around 12/17.
Whooa! That was almost as ugly as
Hi Nick!
On Die, Jan 22, 2002 at 06:18:35 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
I agree 100%!!! To quote mails in the right way is helpful for anyboody
and not only for blind or visually handicapped persons. I'm a blind
computeruser and I get mor then 1000 mails the day and its really not
funny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Christian Schoepplein blurted
And you can add hard coded font sizes in websites to that list, I know
you can overide stylesheets but it's annoying to have to go to such
lengths to read sites like cnn.com.
No, the problem
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Remember that for many blind users these messages are being spoken
to the reader by a voder. Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim
quotations when replying ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it
becomes outright
* Dave Price ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim quotations when replying
ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it becomes outright rude.
Learn to use your screenreader better, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 14:40
* Thomas Hurst said
* Dave Price ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim quotations when replying
ordinarily,
Dave Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:25) :
Learn to use your screenreader better, and teach it to ignore or skip
over quote chars at the start of a new line.
There is no point in sending a load of quoted stuff to anybody. Cut it
down to relevant part before you send. This is
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every minority
problem/consideration we'll never get *anything* done :)
Is it not a minority problem.
Preben
--
() Join
* Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* On 21-01-02 at 14:40
* Thomas Hurst said
Being able to skip quotes is no excuse not to trim them; not caring
whether people will simply ignore your message because it appears to
have no content isn't either.
How do you tell if you are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 15:08
* Preben Randhol said
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every minority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 15:38
* Thomas Hurst said
* Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
You don't; quoting properly has nothing to do with who you're sending
to, it's just basic email
At some point hitherto, Dave Price hath spake thusly:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
to the reader by a voder. Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim
quotations when replying ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it
becomes outright rude.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 16:47
* Derek D. Martin said
Learn to use your screenreader better, and teach it to ignore or skip
over quote chars at the start of a new line.
That's a pretty inconsiderate attitude to take, and doesn't solve the
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
* On 21-01-02 at 15:08
* Preben Randhol said
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 16:58
* Derek D. Martin said
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every minority
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) :
[snipped away several quotes that should have been cut down in the
previous post]
And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where
preben decided to quote me was rather important. Is that where the
hostile
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (16:50) :
I think the quote is taken a little out of context.
Bandwidth's a bugger on mailing lists huh?
If you get about 1000 overquoted mails a day, it is.
Preben
--
() Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:41
* Preben Randhol said
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) :
And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where
preben decided to quote me was rather important. Is that
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
* On 21-01-02 at 16:58
* Derek D. Martin said
[Preben said:]
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 18:07
* Derek D. Martin said
If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
e-mails, so you should have them. If you don't, there's
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% I agree, I've been agreeing all along, I'm not sure where I've picked up
% the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss off everyone on
the mutt-users list... I am your father!
Nick, et al --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 21-01-02 at 18:07
% * Derek D. Martin said
%
% If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
% important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
% e-mails, so you should have them. If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 18:27
* David T-G said
% I agree, I've been agreeing all along, I'm not sure where I've picked up
% the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
e-mails, so you should have them. If you don't,
At some point hitherto, David T-G hath spake thusly:
% Disagree, all this GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! nonsense is insulting.
% Of course I've been reading the thread.
I don't think the comment is directed at you; we know you've been
reading. I think that the argument is that leaving in
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 21-01-02 at 18:27
% * David T-G said
%
% % the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
%
% Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss off everyone on
% the mutt-users list... I am your father!
%
% Haha,
Derek D. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (18:05) :
See above where Preben said this is not a minority problem. He was
refering to the fact that it is a much BROADER problem than just one
that affects minorities. Your comment is irrelevant to that argument.
(Preben: please
On 14:45 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| That would still leave you with a truckload of repeated and mostly
| irrelevent cruft, and not only for someone using a screenreader.
|
| Being able to skip quotes is no excuse not to trim them; not caring
| whether people will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 22:15
* Cameron Simpson said
|
| How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
Rude to do what? I don't follow you.
to just the relevant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 22:29
* Nick Wilson said
Seeing as the sender of these next few lines didn't seem to want to send
them to the list. Here they are in all thier glory.
- ---
Funny that your reply on 'not trimming' was hardly (if at
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21-01-2002 18:56]:
[to Nick]
You should change your quote char. I'd find '@' particularly annoying,
and nobody is using it yet.
I've finally come to my senses; changed from '| ' to ' '. Now it's up
to that other pagan, David, to change ;)
--
René Clerc
* Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [21-01-02] wrote:
Seeing as the sender of these next few lines didn't seem to want to send
them to the list. Here they are in all thier glory.
I got this email, did you bounce it to mutt-users as well?
I'm sorry guys but I feel that my messages are
* On 21-01-02 at 23:04
* René Clerc said
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21-01-2002 18:56]:
[to Nick]
You should change your quote char. I'd find '@' particularly annoying,
and nobody is using it yet.
Reckon there could be a reason there David. Hehe.
I've finally come to my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17
* Brian Foley said
Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have blasted
you out of the water for:
a) using a two-line attribution at the top of all your quotes
Oops, I just thought it looked neater
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17
* Brian Foley said
I got this email, did you bounce it to mutt-users as well?
Yes, sorry about that I thought it would just end up in the thread where
it belonged.
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45
* Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 17:17]:
You think that'll happen? I like the @ idea but I think or could be
pretty bad too.
Oh no, that's not the worst. I've seen something like this on this list
in the past, *in jest*, in a similar thread:
This line is quoted text
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
Are you blind??
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
People who think MS-DOS and Windows are the slickest thing since
sliced butter should be forced to wear a sign stating This mind
intentionally left
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17 Brian Foley said
Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have
blasted you out of the water for: a) using a two-line attribution at
the top of all your quotes
Oops, I just thought it looked neater as it was a
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21 Jan 2002 17:56 -0500]:
I've seen something like this on this list in the past, *in
jest*, in a similar thread:
This line is quoted text
This line is quoted text
Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
think the idea is to choose
* Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 18:57]:
[...]
Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
think the idea is to choose something that identifies the person,
like:
Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact quote prefix* :-) It'd take me forever
to find the thread
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21 Jan 2002 19:04 -0500]:
* Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 18:57]:
Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
think the idea is to choose something that identifies the person,
like:
Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact
Alas! Brian Clark spake thus:
I've used clients like TheBat! before that do it as you've pointed out
below:
BCThis line is quoted text
BCThis line is quoted text
TheBat! is by far the best windows mail program I've seen (unless mutt
is available for windows and I don't know about
At some point hitherto, René Clerc hath spake thusly:
I've finally come to my senses; changed from '| ' to ' '. Now it's up
to that other pagan, David, to change ;)
And there was much rejoicing... ;-)
--
Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_Replying to a message_
By: Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On: Monday, January 21, 2002, 16:54:47 -0700
Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17 Brian Foley said
I think
No, the most annoying way is to indent using spaces, with Outlook style
replies (i.e, 2-3 lines right at the top of the message). Nice huh? :)
Several times I've found myself reading the quoted text thinking it's
the actual reply and wondering why it looks so familiar..
* Brian Clark ([EMAIL
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 20:05]:
TheBat! is by far the best windows mail program I've seen (unless mutt
is available for windows and I don't know about it). It sure beats
Netscape Mail or LookOut, anyway.
Yes, it's a good client. I used SecureBat! with the iKey
John Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ a big quote from Christian Schoepplein ]
[ and then a short but useful suggestion ]
Remember that for many blind users these messages are being spoken
to the reader by a voder. Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim
quotations when replying
Hi Mutt folks,
(this idea is for the Mutt developers but since the thread came up
here, I'm continuing here. Btw. -- sorry for my recent duplicate post.
It won't happen again, folder-hook works for me now.)
There is another great use for an (optional) cursor in the internal
pager -- you could
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:15:08PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
There is another great use for an (optional) cursor in the internal
pager -- you could avoid using the urlview ripper.
The only feature I miss in Mutt compared to Pine 4 is just this:
Within the ususal message view, you use up and
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:15:08PM +0100, Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mutt folks,
(this idea is for the Mutt developers but since the thread came up
here, I'm continuing here. Btw. -- sorry for my recent duplicate post.
It won't happen again, folder-hook works for me now.)
There
Hi Gary and all,
why didn't I come up with this workaround? I use w3m regularly - I
hacked my url_handler.sh into calling it when no Netscape is running
(hardly recently) and as long as Opera refuses to take remote commands
(although it says it understands them, Opera 5 and Opera 6 TP1 don't).
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:23:51AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Display-hooks let you set w3m as the pager for just those messages that
you know have a lot of embedded URLs, e.g.,
display-hook ~A 'set
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:40:36PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:23:51AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Could you automate it? Could you find out whether there are more
than, say, 3 URLs in a message body so it's
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:54:33PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:40:36PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:23:51AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Could you automate it? Could you find out
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
Hi Gary and all,
why didn't I come up with this workaround? I use w3m regularly - I
hacked my url_handler.sh into calling it when no Netscape is running
(hardly recently) and as long as Opera refuses to take remote commands
On 2001-11-28 21:23:27 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I agree with you. Perhaps there could be an optional cursor for
the internal pager.
Any takers? I'd include such a patch with mutt pretty much
immediately if it was clean.
--
Thomas Roessler
Hi Vincent!
On Don, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:01:31 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Christian,
Your Mail-Followup-To header is broken:
Mail-Followup-To: Christian Schoepplein [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist, though your From header is correct.
I
Hi,
I'm a blind computeruser who wants to use mutt. Most things are working
very fine, I had only to change a view settings in the
standardconfiguration to get mutt working with my special screenreading
software (suse-blinux) and hardware devices (brailledisplay and
speechsynt). But one
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 08:26:35PM +0100, Christian Schoepplein wrote:
Hi,
I'm a blind computeruser who wants to use mutt. Most things are working
very fine, I had only to change a view settings in the
standardconfiguration to get mutt working with my special screenreading
software
You can use an external pager with mutt. This would at least be a good
interim solution. set pager=view or something.
-Daniel
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 08:26:35PM +0100, Christian Schoepplein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm a blind computeruser who wants to use mutt. Most things are
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:32:39PM -0500, Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, a workaround might be instead of viewing messages with enter,
view with 'e' - edit-message. that will open the message in your
defined editor, and you can scroll through it there with the cursor...
when done,
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
