Hi Cameron,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:21:31PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
For me this is all theoretical so far as I have not had time. But it is a
real issue I need to address, and I'd like to hear of your efforts if you
try this route.
I have been doing this for some years now, with
they
don't serve POP. I know one mail provider that doesn't honor POP delete
requests so to avoid leaving 100,000 emails on their server that I can't
delete I use IMAP with them. Everywhere else, POP. I'd rather rely on my
own
email storage.
I wondered if, when using IMAP, mutt
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:21:31PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 08Dec2014 22:04, Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried it (a few times
over the years, but not very recently) it never felt quite as easy and
transparent as using mutt on a local
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:33:05AM +, Chris Green wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:21:31PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 08Dec2014 22:04, Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried it (a few times
over the years, but not very recently) it
on
my own
email storage.
I wondered if, when using IMAP, mutt will store the temporary HTML for
passing to Firefox on the local machine rather than the remote
machine. One would expect it to somehow.
This has nothing to do with IMAP. It has to do with how apps work.
I'll
an IMAP server and putting up with the extra work
(not much but there is a bit) of using mutt with IMAP.
No, as I said I just tried it and it doesn't work because Firefox is
too clever and uses the local Firefox rather than the remote one so the
file is in the wrong place.
Firefox
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:57:33AM +, John Long wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:33:05AM +, Chris Green wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:21:31PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 08Dec2014 22:04, Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried
Thanks everyone for all the ideas and feedback.
I *think* I have a solution that will work for me.
I'll change the default mutt temporary directory to something that I
can mount easily on the laptop using sshfs, as long as this has a
unique name that can be the same on the desktop server and on
it?
Check and see?
That's not so easy! I don't currently have an IMAP server for mutt to
connect to, hence
This was really my original question! :-)
If so then you had no question at all. It's obvious Mutt will save the file
on the system where mutt is running. It cannot work
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:42:49AM +, Chris Green wrote:
If we all misunderstood and you have multiple instances of mutt running and
want to be able to access your mail from any of them then use POP and leave
the email on the server. Are you forced to use IMAP?
I currently read my
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
mutt. This works well in general but there are some disadvantages, in
particular the 'v' command to access and view HTML, PDF and other
[...]
So, I'm wondering
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:38:18PM +, Chris Green wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:30:46AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [12-08-14 10:21]:
E.g. if I want to view an HTML E-Mail in Firefox (default browser)
instead of within mutt (using lynx) can I just do
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:04:26PM +, Chris Green wrote:
Hello, Chris,
What I do is that at work, I mount my home mail folder using sshfs. That
way, I
can use my local copies of mutt, xpdf, etc. With large messages, it can get
slow, sometimes, but it does save some time.
Yes,
On 09Dec2014 10:33, Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:21:31PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 08Dec2014 22:04, Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried it (a few times
over the years, but not very recently) it never felt
I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
mutt. This works well in general but there are some disadvantages, in
particular the
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [12-08-14 10:21]:
I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
mutt. This works well in general
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:30:46AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [12-08-14 10:21]:
I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
At the moment to access my mail
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [12-08-14 10:40]:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:30:46AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [12-08-14 10:21]:
I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:12:27AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [12-08-14 10:40]:
I work somewhat similarily. I store all mail on my local box and maintain
a tmux session which I access remotely via ssh -X. I can view html using
the home machine's browser
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [12-08-14 11:52]:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:12:27AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
[...]
From *outside* I utilize fish://ip-addr/local/directory/...
Usually the html files are not that large and doing the transfer in the
background, you can continue doing
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:15:06PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [12-08-14 11:52]:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:12:27AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
[...]
From *outside* I utilize fish://ip-addr/local/directory/...
Usually the html files are not that large
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
mutt.
I suspect
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
At the moment to access my mail remotely I ssh into the server and run
mutt. This works
IMAP unless they
don't serve POP. I know one mail provider that doesn't honor POP delete
requests so to avoid leaving 100,000 emails on their server that I can't
delete I use IMAP with them. Everywhere else, POP. I'd rather rely on my own
email storage.
I wondered if, when using IMAP, mutt
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 06:40:15PM -0300, Eduardo Alvarez wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:19:55PM +, Chris Green wrote:
I have been using mutt for many, many years with a local (Unix style)
mail spool. Mail is delivered to my system by SMTP (postfix locally).
At the moment to
* Chris Green c...@isbd.net [2014-12-08 17:09 -0500]:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried it (a few times
over the years, but not very recently) it never felt quite as easy and
transparent as using mutt on a local mail spool.
I stopped using IMAP directly a while ago, and
that doesn't honor POP delete
requests so to avoid leaving 100,000 emails on their server that I can't
delete I use IMAP with them. Everywhere else, POP. I'd rather rely on my own
email storage.
I wondered if, when using IMAP, mutt will store the temporary HTML for
passing to Firefox
On 08Dec2014 22:04, Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
Doesn't anyone use IMAP? I must admit when I tried it (a few times
over the years, but not very recently) it never felt quite as easy and
transparent as using mutt on a local mail spool.
I would advocate trying offlineimap. I am a huge fan
Am 2008-01-08 22:53:10, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
Almost a week gone by and nobody picked this mail up.
:-) Maybe to less infos...
Am I asking the wrong list? Is there some error so obvious nobody even thinks
its worth to answer?
First of all: Since you have:
set
* Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am 2008-01-08 22:53:10, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
Almost a week gone by and nobody picked this mail up.
:-) Maybe to less infos...
This I can hopefully mend...
Am I asking the wrong list? Is there some error so obvious nobody even
thinks
INBOX.ml.spamassassin is curently subscribed as the query for
subscribed folders (LSUB *) showed:
* LSUB (\Marked \HasNoChildren) . INBOX.ml.spamassassin
And there was new mail, as a test using mutt locally accessing the mailspool
directly showed. But... my mutt using IMAP did not take note
showed. But... my mutt using IMAP did not take note of it. I have the
following check intervalls:
# Timeouts
set mail_check=15
set timeout=15
So I guess, I should see new mail after 30 seconds at least.
What am I doing wrong?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
http
* Gerhard Hring [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020312 02:11]:
Le 11/03/02 à 17:15, Gerhard Häring écrivit:
Le 11/03/02 à 15:54, Simon White écrivit:
[mutt imap is slow]
Reading the ~5000 emails from my mutt-user folder takes approx. 18
seconds. That's really slow, IMNSHO.
Apparently, such a best
Hello
I am having some performance problems with IMAP via MUTT, it seems hungrier
for I/O than PINE was. However, I like mutt enough to put up with some
slowness, but over a 10mbps network direct to the mailserver I'd expect it to
be a bit better.
Maybe a better IMAP server would help. I can
Le 11/03/02 à 15:54, Simon White écrivit:
Hello
I am having some performance problems with IMAP via MUTT, it seems hungrier
for I/O than PINE was. However, I like mutt enough to put up with some
slowness, but over a 10mbps network direct to the mailserver I'd expect it to
be a bit better
Le 11/03/02 à 17:15, Gerhard Häring écrivit:
Le 11/03/02 à 15:54, Simon White écrivit:
[mutt imap is slow]
[...]
Reading the ~5000 emails from my mutt-user folder takes approx. 18
seconds. That's really slow, IMNSHO. I think the only thing that would
really help would be to install
On Sat 02-Feb-2002 at 11:53:55AM -0600, William Guynes wrote:
The only thing that worked was spoolfile in {server}INBOX format,
but not in imap://server/INBOX format.
The URL style syntax is new to mutt-1.3.*. If you are using 1.2.5, then
try upgrading to a recent development version like
. These are somehow different than RC files?
No, that's the same thing.
%
% The Mutt and IMAP document tends to gloss over these details.
REMEMBER THIS. One thing that mutt needs is improved user documentation.
Unfortunately, the hardest thing for developers and users familiar with
it is to remember what
thing that
worked was spoolfile in {server}INBOX format, but not in
imap://server/INBOX format. However, that assumes only one IMAP
box.
Can someone straighten me out here? The documentation talks about
initialization files. These are somehow different than RC files?
The Mutt and IMAP document
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 11:53:55AM -0600, William Guynes wrote:
I'm trying to get moved over to mutt. I've had it with Pine roles,
it's driving me nuts.
IMAP implementation has me a bit confused. I have 3 IMAP mailboxes,
on 3 diferent servers. If I understand the docs correctly, I can
I'd like to know is it actually possible to somehow 'alias' an IMAP
server namespace to a prefix? I'm using 2 IMAP accounts and everything
is fine, except that often I'd like to save an message to another
server: I get personal mail to company account and would like to store
it to private
On 2002.01.09, in 1010610421.2294.0.camel@panucho,
Ilkka Tuohela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=company/business
which will be translated to imap://imap.company.com/Mail/business
=private/brother
and a folder like imap://isp-imap.isp.com/Mail/brother
...
Of course this
Quoting Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' mutt [05/09/01 11:28 -0400]:
On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt.
What
I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP
On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
Hi,
I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt. What
I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP server as well, instead of
using sendmail on localhost. Is there something I have overlooked? I
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' mutt [05/09/01 11:28 -0400]:
On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt. What
I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP server as well, instead of
using sendmail on localhost
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that it can call Cyrus' deliver
program (or otherwise set up the right
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail
(and I'm going by the archive since I just subscribed to this list),
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail
(and I'm going by the archive since I just subscribed to this list),
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that
Cyrus' deliver
program (or otherwise set up the right permissions). I can give
more information if you have Cyrus and are curious...
As root? Do you have to run cyrus on the IMAP server or on the
client side? It so happens that I run the mail server that I am
using mutt+IMAP to access
I am using mutt to connect to an IMAP server. I'd like to have mutt
automatically grab new mail and put it into separate IMAP boxes, somewhat
the way that procmail can sort your incoming mail into separate boxes.
How do I go about doing this? Currently, I just use the limit command
to
Hello Jack,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:05:09PM -0600, Jack McKinney wrote:
I am using mutt to connect to an IMAP server. I'd like to have mutt
automatically grab new mail and put it into separate IMAP boxes, somewhat
the way that procmail can sort your incoming mail into separate boxes.
On Thu Feb 1 12:52:35 2001, Brendan Cully wrote:
1) How do I browse an IMAP folder if I don't want to specify it as my
default mail directory ? If I try to open {user@server}INBOX or simply
{user@server}, I see the messages, but I can't browse the folders. I can
browse the folders if I
to another ?
through the regular mutt means. Tag your messages and copy them to
another folder. If they are both on your IMAP server, mutt will use IMAP
copy.
4) And the last question, but it's not specific to IMAP : can I specify
several ID's (name, email, and signature) ? I know about folder
Hi.
I need to access an IMAP box and its subfolders. But I have some
problems with it. So I have some questions :
1) How do I browse an IMAP folder if I don't want to specify it as my
default mail directory ? If I try to open {user@server}INBOX or simply
{user@server}, I see the messages, but I
Hi all.
I'm currently trying to be happy with mutt running against
courier-imapd, but I'm currently experiencing grief and frustration.
Basically, what I want is to use procmail to split out mailing list mail
into separate mailboxes like I was doing before I moved to imap. In my
mutt config, I
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:21:34PM -0500,
Michael MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] is thought to have said:
Can anyone point me in a good direction for solving this problem? I'm
frustrated because I can't seem to figure out if the problem is with
configuration or if it's implementation problems
Hello All,
My users convinced me to go to IMAP for the mail system verses using
sendmail/local mailboxes/POP. They swore up and down that the old
command line junkies like me would not be effected. So I let them
implement cyrus IMAP. I can get to my inbox ( {localhost:143}INBOX )
but I
notify work for imap folders? Is there a way (without macros) to teach
mutt which IMAP servers/folders I usually read, and have it selectable?
:)
--
Dan Boger
System Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
,
without knowing in advance which folders are available?
None that I'm aware of, but perhaps Brendan (he did most of the IMAP stuff)
knows more about it.
Does the new mail notify work for imap folders?
Yes, it works nicely
Is there a way (without macros) to teach
mutt which IMAP servers
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 03:00:27PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
Does the new mail notify work for imap folders?
Yes, it works nicely
ok, how do I get it to work? I put the IMAP folders I want in my $mailboxes,
but I never get notified still?
Is there a way (without macros) to teach
mutt
it will show an N in the "change
to another mailbox" window. (the one you reach through c?tab)
Other than that, I'm not shure.
Is there a way (without macros) to teach
mutt which IMAP servers/folders I usually read, and have it selectable?
You mean like the mailboxes option
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 12:40:24AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% I want to like Mutt but I have a huge number of questions that I haven't
% been able to figure out answers to. All of them have to do with IMAP.
I'm sure we can help you. mutt is very likable :-) I'm no IMAP guy, and
the best
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 05 Jun 2000:
It may be the 'right' answer but unless you have control of the IMAP
server it's not very practical is it! When using IMAP there really
isn't an MDA involved.
This has been discussed before. :-)
Just because the mail folders
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:25:03PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 05 Jun 2000:
It may be the 'right' answer but unless you have control of the IMAP
server it's not very practical is it! When using IMAP there really
isn't an MDA involved.
to Netscape? I use mutt with IMAP as my main mailer here at
work, and this could greatly speed some things up.
--
Bob BellCompaq Computer Corporation
Software Engineer 110 Spit Brook Rd - ZKO3-3/U14
TruCluster GroupNashua, NH 03062-2698
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 603-884-0595
Chris --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 12:40:24AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% I'm sure we can help you. mutt is very likable :-) I'm no IMAP guy, and
% the best folks are probably the IMAP code writers and maybe Chris Green,
% our resident IMAP-tester and
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:36:52PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% Oh thank you! :-)
Hey, any time, pal! BTW, new email address?
Yes, I'm trying out this server in the USA rather than my previous
UK one, apart from anything else it's cheaper.
% isn't an MDA involved.
Er, I beg to differ
Hi,
I want to like Mutt but I have a huge number of questions that I haven't
been able to figure out answers to. All of them have to do with IMAP.
My mail servers at work are all IMAP. I like being able to keep my mail
on the server and not suck up my own personal disk space. However, I
don't
Timothy --
...and then Timothy Grant said...
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I want to like Mutt but I have a huge number of questions that I haven't
% been able to figure out answers to. All of them have to do with IMAP.
I'm sure we can help you. mutt is very likable :-) I'm no IMAP guy, and
the best
You are reading your mail off an IMAP server right? And you have it set
_not_ to expunge messages from the imap server. So, even if a copy is
fetched locally to mailbox, it may stay on the imap server.
Is there anyway to expunge the messages from the IMAP server? With a setting of some
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 09:12:12PM -0400, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote:
c. Remove the use of the mbox entirely and just keep their mail on the IMAP server,
again negating most of the use of IMAP.
I would have though the idea of the IMAP server *is* that you
keep all your mail on the
Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a long time.
Then when I open mutt again all my mail is duplicated (two copies of everything).
Dave
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Sorry to interfer
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a
long time. Then when I open mutt again all my mail is duplicated (two
copies of everything).
You are reading your mail off an IMAP server right? And you have it set
_not_
Actually I didn't see any option to expunge the messages from the imap server.
Dave
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a
long time. Then when I open
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Actually I didn't see any option to expunge the messages from the imap server.
try using fetchmail to pull your mails from the imap server.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
Green light in a.m. for new projects. Red
Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that:
But you must admit that the two Mail-(User/Admin)-HOWTOS are very poor: I actually
read them, but the Admin one only teaches you how to setup qmail (I went for postfix,
which has great- and thourough :-) - docs and works flawlessly for me) and the
Hi Suresh,
On a standalone linux box connected over a dialup this is trivial - not
when you are telneted into your mailbox which gives you just an 1 mb quota
...
got it? :)
Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me; now I understand what mbox is
for.:-)
Now I see, as I
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
Sorry to interfer in this tread too, but what is the purpose of mbox?
All read mails will be moved to this folder if you say set move=yes in
your muttrc (it will ask you politely first, of course) :)
Actually, to be
Manuel Arriaga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
mbox is there for people who use "real" *nix systems with many users and
therefore restrictions on the harddrive space they may use, which has
nothing to do with my case.
Well, not only for them... It's also for users like you who
Whenever I exit mutt I get the question: Do you want to move messages into dir/mbox?
I know what the purpose of mbox is, but I have a large number of students who are
becomming confused on what it is and what to do about it. Because removing features is
much easier with users rather than
Dave (Grizz) Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 22 May 2000:
Whenever I exit mutt I get the question: Do you want to move messages
into dir/mbox?
...
a. Default to using a mbox and always move their mail for them? So they
don't have to answer.
set move=yes
(You want to set that in
Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Sorry to interfer in this tread too, but what is the purpose of mbox?
All read mails will be moved to this folder if you say set move=yes in
your muttrc (it will ask you politely first, of course) :)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at
What do I have to do, to get mutt running with imap? Which version of
mutt shell I take? How do I have to compile it?
Thanks Manuel
--
Registrierter Linux-User #130261
** **
* MAXIMUM Internet Services AG | Fon +49 8152 918600
Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
What do I have to do, to get mutt running with imap? Which version of
mutt shell I take? How do I have to compile it?
Any version of mutt you want - your 1.01i will do fine. See the mutt/imap
howto at http://www.mutt.org for more. Just read
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 01:08:39PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
What do I have to do, to get mutt running with imap? Which version of
mutt shell I take? How do I have to compile it?
Any version of mutt you want - your 1.01i will do
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 01:08:39PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
What do I have to do, to get mutt running with imap? Which version of
mutt shell I take? How do I have to compile it?
Any version of mutt you want - your 1.01i will do
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
mutt -f '{imap.server}folder-name'
Version 1.2 has a whole raft of IMAP enhancements and bug fixes though
so I would recommend doenloading and building that if you can. When
you build it you need to give the '--with-imap' option to ./configure
(plus
Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
mutt -f '{imap.server}folder-name'
I thought that just the 1.2 version got the imap part. What's abaut
the performance, does it work fine?
I was checking imap folders on a .95.4i - it was pretty ok ... except that
m$ sexchange has a badly broken
On 2000-05-18 13:48:02 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
I use mutt 1.3 (and have been building the devel
versions as and when they came out g). AFAICT,
--with-imap is enabled by default.
That would be a bug.
Mutt is small enough that I can afford to do a
./configure and make
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
So, no, you don't get IMAP support by default on 1.1.13 at least, and
I think 1.1.13 is actually identical to 1.2.
my bad ... thanks
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
Walk softly and carry a megawatt laser.
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 02:05:30PM +0200, Andre Wobst wrote:
Hi,
I've troubles with the imap ssl certificates, saved in the file
certificate_file, which I set to ~/.mutt.certificate_file in my
~/.muttrc. If I do so, I can accept a certificate not only once but
always (otherwise this option
/imap_ssl.c
===
RCS file: /home/roessler/cvs/mutt/imap/imap_ssl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 imap_ssl.c
--- imap/imap_ssl.c 2000/04/26 07:32:42 1.12
+++ imap/imap_ssl.c 2000/05/16 21:56:14
@@ -284,7 +284,40
Me three.
I'm running the latest version of OpenSSH for Linux, on a libc5 machine. I
wonder if libc5 could be the issue...however, I don't have access to a
glibc2 machine that has access to a IMAP/SSL server to test.
-C
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 06:23:47PM +0300, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 02:05:30PM +0200, Andre Wobst wrote:
I've troubles with the imap ssl certificates, saved in the file
certificate_file, which I set to ~/.mutt.certificate_file in my
~/.muttrc. If I do so, I can accept a certificate not only once but
always (otherwise this option isn't
Hi,
I've troubles with the imap ssl certificates, saved in the file
certificate_file, which I set to ~/.mutt.certificate_file in my
~/.muttrc. If I do so, I can accept a certificate not only once but
always (otherwise this option isn't available). The certificate is
stored in the file
Greetings --
First off, I'm new to the list ( and to mutt ), so Hello!
Second, I have a question regarding browsing my imap folders:
Why do I see two instances of each folder, one with a '.' appended
and one without?
For instance:
1 IMAP../
On 2000-02-01 15:50:00 -0800, Corey wrote:
Why do I see two instances of each folder, one with a '.' appended
and one without?
It's because some IMAP servers, Cyrus is one of them, support having
folders inside folders, and a mailbox with the same namespace as a
folder.
So what you get
And upon Wednesday of February 02, the illustrious Matthew Hawkins spoketh the
following..
.
On 2000-02-01 15:50:00 -0800, Corey wrote:
Why do I see two instances of each folder, one with a '.' appended
and one without?
It's because some IMAP servers, Cyrus is one of them, support
If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
with mutt? Is there a simple way to give them names/aliases so they
can be accessed like local folders? Having to enter the full address
of the folder every time one
On Monday, 13 September 1999 at 11:55, Chris Green wrote:
If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
with mutt? Is there a simple way to give them names/aliases so they
can be accessed like local folders?
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
