Re: Geolocation IP help

Start by checking all of these resources/sites: https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:02 PM Sam Kretchmer wrote: > To anyone who might be able to help me reach someone clued at the State of > Illinois website. > > > > We (Coeo Solutions) had to acquire an

Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities

So the FCC is efficient enough to understand BGP vulnerabilities but not efficient enough to understand what a spam call is? On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:20 PM Job Snijders wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 04:05:21PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Now do you think they're going to

Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities

The FCC has spent the last several years hounding us voice providers over spam calls. They've implemented laws. They have required us to do paperwork. Have they been successful in that task? Now do you think they're going to properly understand what an SS7 or vulnerability is? On Thu, May 16,

Re: Attn Access ISPs - FCC BB Labels (machine-readable standards)

I appreciate your effort in making a tool! This is another tool: https://bblmaker.com/ - I like it because I have one CSS file and then a few content pages for the plans. Just FYI the Oct 10 deadline is for 100k or less subscribers. April 10 for 100k+. On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 9:08 AM

Re: Unimus as NCM (Network Configuration Management) Tool

We've used Unimus exclusively since 2018. It's absolutely wonderful for NCM. On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 5:20 PM Shahid Shafi wrote: > Hi Network Experts, > > Is anyone using Unimus as your main NCM tool in production? I am looking > at an NCM tool that can scale upto 10,000 to 15,000 Network

Re: Without further comment:

Don't assume my gender. You'll offend me. That's a lot of manual work lol... On Sat, Mar 30, 2024, 11:22 AM William Herrin wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 7:38 AM Josh Luthman > wrote: > > How do you know the poster's gender?? > > Howdy, > > As Josh is an uncommo

Re: Without further comment:

How do you know the poster's gender?? On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 7:26 AM Bill Woodcock wrote: > > https://pleroma.pch.net/media/59934e723985a9d0eb476eda11ca090f602091190d11d181c5d0dd7523755768.png > > -Bill > >

Re: Federal subsidy boosting internet affordability set to expire unless Congress acts | PBS NewsHour

ACP does not expire tomorrow. Today is the last day to enroll. The funds are expected to run out in April or May - this is the last month providers will be reimbursed. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-24-23A1.pdf On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:56 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > The Affordable

Re: Any clue as to when bgp.he.net will be back?

My Windows Chrome nor Android Chrome have any ad/script blockers. Both showed me the error page. Looks like it's showing me the tool now, though. On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:10 PM Alec Edworthy wrote: > As someone said on a different thread, and it worked for me, check your > ad/script

Re: Outside plant - prewire customer demarc preference

Keep in mind new construction versus having to get around drywall. 2" is beyond excessive. We use 1.25" duct for our 288ct *PLUS* up to 6 flat drop cables. On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 7:45 PM Brandon Martin wrote: > On 11/28/23 10:42, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Why not just use SCH40 PVC sticks?

Re: CPE/NID options

but “proper” NIDs have dying gasp. If > the NID is going on a customer premise, I consider dying gasp a must. The > dying gasp allows your NOC to determine the difference between a network > break and fiber cut. > > > Tom > > > > On Nov 27, 2023, at 6:41 AM, Josh L

Re: CPE/NID options

CPE device is the lack of RFC2544 (or > equivalent) testing, and monitoring of the complete circuit with TWAMP. > Both of which are used to ensure compliance with an SLA. > > Ryan Hamel > > -- > *From:* NANOG on behalf of > Josh Luthman > *Sent

Re: CPE/NID options

When you say fiber, is it Ethernet? If you just want layer 2 and a media converter, Mikrotik is a super good answer. On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:19 AM Christopher Hawker wrote: > Hi Ross, > > I've found these Mikrotik devices to be excellent and reliable: > > CRS310-8G+2S+IN: 8 x 2.5G copper

Re: Outside plant - prewire customer demarc preference

If I was building a house I'd just get some 1" conduit from the outside to the inside. Put it in a NEMA box. That solves the problem forever. As a fiber ISP, and assuming you're doing your own WiFi in the house, you can do conduit inside or we can just run the fiber. We don't want to run

Re: Fiber/OSP Technician Training and Apprenticeship Programs

I personally find college, for the most part, as a scam and simply a quick way to enter into debt. Yes there are exceptions, like everything. I/We started doing fixed wireless in 2006 with no training. We started fiber to the home in 2019 with little training - a neighbor to the north showed us

Re: OSP Management

3GIS here On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:33 AM Stonebraker, Jack J wrote: > 3GIS here. Great product. > > *JJ Stonebraker* | Associate Director > The University of Texas System | Office of Telecommunication Services > *(512) 232-0888* | j...@ots.utsystem.edu > > > --

Re: Captive portal for suspended accounts

Steve, It looks like you're using Sonar for billing. That has the feature built in. On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 12:20 PM Steve Saner via NANOG wrote: > Yes, that is exactly the desire. > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:03 AM J. Hellenthal > wrote: > >> Im hearing something similar to "when I

Re: Looking for Hulu geolocation and IP space block contact

https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 4:09 PM Eric Kuhnke wrote: > I have a large set of residential last mile gigabit customers in the > NYC/NJ area where the /24 sized blocks for our CPE DHCP pools has just been > blocked by Hulu. Please contact me off

Re: Amazon Prime NOC contact

https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 6:29 PM Adair Winter wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone from the Amazon Prime team might be hanging around > or if anyone has a good contact? We are seeing a number of our CG-NAT > subnets getting blocked with the "VPN"

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

Not everyone can afford $1000 to start up Starlink and then pay $130+ per month. That may be an option for some, but certainly not the majority. If 100% of a town was covered by a single company with data caps, those that are crying from hitting 1.2 TB/month will not be enough for a competitor

Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps

Mark, In my world I constantly see people with 0 fixed internet options. Many of these locations do not even have mobile coverage. Competition is fine in town, but for millions of people in the US (and I'm going to assume it's worse or comparable in CA/MX) there is no service. As a company

Re: Do ISP's collect and analyze traffic of users?

Our ISP does not collect (nor obviously sell) customer information/traffic. People volunteer all of their information on Facebook/Twitter/etc already, I'm not sure I see a concern. On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 9:07 AM Tom Beecher wrote: > I did see an article about Team Cymru selling netflow data

Re: Routed optical networks

Maybe some clarification as to what you're asking for would help. You're mixing fiber, networks, and a MAN. Fiber is just the medium. It could be for IP switching or projecting a light show. Are you asking if there are diverse paths throughout a metro area? On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 2:30 PM

Re: Best Linux (or BSD) hosted BGP?

I think FRR is a fork of Quagga. On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 2:04 PM Tomas Jonsson wrote: > VyOS uses FRR, but they used to run quagga. > > And most bsd(?)/linux package managers has frr in their repository so > maybe that could be something to look at? > > > On 23/05/01 13:2

Re: Best Linux (or BSD) hosted BGP?

Doesn't VyOS simply use Quagga? On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 12:09 PM Jean Franco wrote: > Hi, > > VyOS > > Best regards, > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 1:03 PM Bryan Fields wrote: > >> I know best subjective, but I'm looking at a project to announce some IP >> space >> that's between uses now and see

Re: Windstream/Kinetic OSP assistance/clie sought

Use broadbandmap.fcc.gov to confirm availability or not. If Kinetic says it's available there and you can't sign up, challenge the location. On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 12:04 AM Justin Streiner wrote: > Other people on their street do have Kinetic, and I believe Windstream > laid cable from the

Re: Backup DC power standardization with Photovoltiac battery systems?

Simple answer: No. Customer routers and CPEs are a mix match of a) voltage - 5v, 9v, 12v, etc and b) connector - dc barrel, USB, molex, etc. Fixed wireless and fiber for certain and I have to assume it's the same story with DSL/cable. On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 9:06 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > On

Re: Auth0 geolocation?

g supp...@akamai.com after finding the > discrepancy, waiting for them to finish processing the changes. There's > gotta be a better way to do this, though! > -- > *From:* Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:56:53 AM > *To:* Tim Burke >

Re: Auth0 geolocation?

Is there a publicly available email address/form/etc that we can put on TBW page? On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 9:43 AM Tim Burke wrote: > For those following along at home, it appears that Akamai was the culprit. > Didn't even know they offered geolocation services! Many thanks and much > respect to

Re: Hulu US Cogent IPs problem

Maybe try: vx-whitelistrequ...@hulu.com Report back so it can be added to TBW page if it is useful. On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:31 AM Jose Montero Martín (TRABAJO) < josemonteromar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good morning, > > Our customers are facing issues accessing Hulu from our Cogent IPs >

Re: Spectrum Engineer

RPKI? On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 1:06 PM Dennis Burgess wrote: > Can someone from spectrum give me a call or shoot me a email. We have a > customer that is hard down, BGP is up, we are advertising the prefix to you > but its not making its way out on the public internet. > > > > *[image:

Re: Searchable archives of the list?

Google? geolocation site:https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/ On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:30 AM Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Josh Luthman said: > > Why wouldn't one use the link that's provided in the message? > > The request is right there in the Subject

Re: Searchable archives of the list?

Why wouldn't one use the link that's provided in the message? List-Archive: That link is in every NANOG/mailing list message, FYI. On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:05 AM Edward McNair wrote: > > The easiest way to search the archives is the use our

Re: 1.1.1.1 support?

Try asking dns-operati...@lists.dns-oarc.net for someone at CloudFlare. For what it's worth, it works for me. I'm in Troy, OH. C:\Users\jluthman>dig www.moi.gov.cy @1.1.1.1 +short 212.31.118.26 On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:43 AM Saku Ytti wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 15:26, Matt Harris

Re: Yondoo provided router, has "password" as admin pw, won't let us change it

What's the problem with double NAT? I can't imagine an elderly mom trying to host Xbox games - which is 95% of the problem with double NAT these days (the other 5% being Ubiquiti bros having to access their Unifi router from anywhere). Your screenshots didn't come through, I suspect it's

Re: Spectrum (legacy TWC) Infrastructure - Contact Off List

Micro trenching...in suburban or rural deployments? On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 7:59 PM Kevin Shymkiw wrote: > Clayton, > > Did you leverage things like micro trenching for this project? I may be > mislead, but I thought micro trenching these days has helped drive the cost > of doing this down

Re: Spectrum (legacy TWC) Infrastructure - Contact Off List (Patrick Garner)

Orange is so you can a) see it and b) orange = telecom Blue = clean water Green = sewer Yellow = gas Red = high voltage On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:20 PM Keith Stokes wrote: > I think the bright orange is so you don't run over it with your lawn > mower, especially since it's going to be there

Re: Increasing problems with geolocation/IPv4 access

Every block I've gotten I just went through TheBrothersWisp geo location page and just had them fix their information. This includes virgin and re-issued blocks from ARIN. I've had a couple of random issues like Hulu thinking I'm a VPN, PSN blocking a /24 because a /32 failed his password too

Level 3 A and B DNS resolvers

*** Request timed out. 918 ms17 ms17 ms ae2.3601.ear1.Washington12.level3.net [4.69.148.45] 1018 ms17 ms17 ms a.resolvers.level3.net [4.2.2.1] Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373

Re: Google Speed Test

All of those links time out for me (at speedtest.cloud). On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 11:06 AM Adam Blackington wrote: > https://www.speedtest.cloud > are also GCP endpoints. > > Adam > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:55 PM Dave Taht wrote: > >> Waveform leverages cloud flare's CDN. >> >> I have a

Re: Google Speed Test

They axed all that years ago, it was here: https://www.google.com/get/videoqualityreport On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 2:43 PM Douglas Fischer wrote: > I have recollection of something like embeded quality testing on youtube. > I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter test. > > I

Re: Google Speed Test

Those are all M-Lab tests - Stadia and google search results. They're not always certainly through Google's network (I would have to imagine they're typically not). On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 1:17 PM Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Robert Webb said: > > None of them are accurate. The one

Re: Verizon Email to SMS gateway

A delay wouldn't make sense if it's a lack of FCC registration. Undeliverable would. My messages to vtext have worked well, it took <5 minutes as recently as November 10. On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:27 PM Randy Carpenter wrote: > > That is the understanding I got when discussing the situation

Re: Geo-IP Sling.com and/or Dish Network Contact.

t them and about to tell this customer to switch from their > service. > > Or if someone knows why 23.138.114.0/24 would be geolocated outside > US/Michigan would be great to know. > > Thanks! > > Sent via RFC1925 compliant device > > On May 11, 2022, at 10:35 AM, Josh

Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements

It's very important to specify the /24 inside the /23 for example so as you said "for all our subnets being advertised". On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:01 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > Thanks everyone for your inputs. So bottomline setup RPKI and setup ROA's > > for all our subnets being advertised. > >

Re: juniper.net down?

https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/juniper.net?proto=http Just you. On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:27 PM Jeff Shultz wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 11:15 AM wrote: > >> juniper.net down? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Aaron >> >> aar...@gvtc.com >> >> >> > > Website is up from AS12044 (Oregon) at

Re: CLEC lawfirm recommendations?

Tom Forte should still be able to help you get started (he's contracted sales now). thefor...@hotmail.com theforty...@gmail.com I saw him in Vegas last week, I didn't think to get his new email address. On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 2:22 PM Glenn Kelley wrote: > The team @ Inteserra are amazing. >

Re: Article: DoD, DoJ press FCC for industry-wide BGP security standard

ROA isn't mandatory. If it was, it would be a better comparison. Still, showing that low adoption rate shows the industry's interest in it. I think we all see the problem, but is there a viable solution? Is the problem big enough to warrant the transition? On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 2:29 PM

Re: Article: DoD, DoJ press FCC for industry-wide BGP security standard

Does another barrier to entry make sense? This makes it even more difficult still for new companies to start. Do we trust the FCC to come up with an industry wide fool proof (whatever that means) security standard? This is the same government that can't stop fake phone calls. On Tue, Sep 20,

Re: Contact info for Level 3 CDN GeoIP

Did you check these services? https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 6:34 PM Christopher Munz-Michielin < christop...@ve7alb.ca> wrote: > Hey All, > > For my dayjob I help run an Anycast DNS network and we've recently had > complaints from our users in the

Re: FCC BDC engineer?

you are correct, I linked to the wrong document. > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:36 PM Josh Luthman > wrote: > >> Andrew, >> >> Where does it say that it is or is not required? This is a request for >> clarification filed by the CCA. >> >> On Tue, Jul 5,

Re: FCC BDC engineer?

Andrew, Where does it say that it is or is not required? This is a request for clarification filed by the CCA. On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 1:59 PM Andrew Latham wrote: > I read https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-22-543A1.pdf and a PE > is not required. > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM

Re: FCC BDC engineer?

There still is no clarification on the requirement of an official PE stamp. My personal feeling is that if it's not decided by now, the week after filing opens, it would be an unreasonable burden for filers. I believe it's more "professional engineer" like a CPNI for CBRS. On Tue, Jul 5, 2022

Re: Reporting Comcast outside plant issues?

You have to find the local "Damage Prevention" guy. You might call the county engineer office and see what they have for permits (for Comcast) in the area and call that guy. You might also find out the owner of the poles, often the power company but maybe the phone company. On Sun, Jun 26, 2022

Re:

I use Cogent: https://www.cogentco.com/en/looking-glass and HE which is easier to remember: https://lg.he.net/ On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 9:56 AM Glenn Kelley wrote: > Good Monday Morning Everyone. > > Quick Question: > > What is everyone's favorite software for running a looking glass. > > A

Re: Upstream bandwidth usage

>Well, my dsl provider has like a 25/5 50/10 so clearly everybody has the headroom to get to 10 at least. >I mean, most users have no clue about such things. Lol I'm sure you're no network operator Michael. That's not accurate (well your first statement). On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 8:29 PM Mike

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

Look up the Broadband Data Act and the FCC BDC. This will identify what individuals have service in ~6 months. On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:41 AM Sean Donelan wrote: > I wish (...) that public right of way agreements included a requirement > that service providers must publish accurate service

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

>Yep. No one is forcing carriers to take USF money. They can essentially build whatever they want without USF money. Unless of course USF funds are used to over build your already existing network. This is exactly the situation I'm in. On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:52 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > >

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers

CAF nor RDOF required IPv6. BEAD doesn't say anything about IPv6. I seriously doubt v6 gets included into the conversation because even NANOG can't agree it is needed. The bigger concern are the people that have no connectivity at all (no 1 mbps, no 25/3, no 100/20, no gigabit, etc). On Tue,

Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal?

I'd bet it's cheaper and easier to quantify new hardware than software. Labor was super expensive and now it is ready to implode. On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:27 AM Dave Taht wrote: > As I've been saying for a while, instead of buying new kit, perhaps we > could spend some time on getting better

Re: Geo-IP Sling.com and/or Dish Network Contact.

Dish/Sling isn't on here but check this list: https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:18 PM Nicholas Warren wrote: > Does anyone know how to get ahold of Sling.com or Dish to update location > information on IPv4 addresses? > > I don’t know if meta

Re: Disney+ Issues

29/04/2022 14:22, Josh Luthman wrote: > > > Did you try: > > > > Disney+: E-mail them the trouble subnet at > > techops-distribut...@disneystreaming.com. Also, > > techops-servi...@disneystreaming.com will probably be where that sends > > you. Another possible

Re: Disney+ Issues

Did you try: Disney+: E-mail them the trouble subnet at techops-distribut...@disneystreaming.com. Also, techops-servi...@disneystreaming.com will probably be where that sends you. Another possible email is disneyplusispsupp...@disneyplus.com. https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/

Re: Geolocation data management practices?

Go through this list: https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ The RFC only works if they're pulling your feed and they'd only know that if you contact them in the first place. On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 9:14 AM Rubens Kuhl wrote: > Besides geofeed, there are also geoidx records in IRRs

Re: fs.com Ethernet switches

Using a cheap POE switch. I'm pretty happy with it since it's cheap. It's a bit noisy with a small load would be my only complaint - I suspect it's the same volume at full load. No management/layer 3 features on mine nor do I want them. I don't know if L2 only means you want management or not.

Re: Hulu Contact?

Start here... https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 3:02 PM Jason Lamb wrote: > Hi all, > > > > We are having some issues with customers logging into Hulu on some recent > IPv4 ranges we have added to our network. I think it is likely an IPv4 > geolocation

Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages

: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 03:07:47PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote: > > We've routinely seen where lines not even connected to the same circuit > in > > any way (ie an OTA antenna coax line and cat5 POE) cause issues with one > > another. As much as we would all love to have a pe

Re: PoE, Comcast Modems, and Service Outages

We've routinely seen where lines not even connected to the same circuit in any way (ie an OTA antenna coax line and cat5 POE) cause issues with one another. As much as we would all love to have a perfect line in the sand, there isn't. Don't rule anything out until the issue is resolved. As

Re: ISP data collection from home routers

> CEO > l...@6by7.net > "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company > in the world.” > > FCC License KJ6FJJ > > Sent from my iPhone via RFC1149. > > On Mar 24, 2022, at 6:26 AM, Josh Luthman > wrote: > >  > I'm surpr

Re: ISP data collection from home routers

I'm surprised we're having this discussion about an internet device that the customer is using to publicize all of their information on Facebook and Twitter. Consumers do not care enough about their privacy to the point where they are providing the information willingly. >Consumers should have

Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud

What if they're actively connected and you get a subpoena? On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 1:30 PM TJ Trout wrote: > ExpressVPN does NOT and WILL NEVER log: > IP addresses (source or VPN) > > Browsing history > > Traffic destination or metadata > > DNS queries > > We have carefully engineered our apps

Re: V6 still widely supported (was Re: CC: s to Non List Members,

Verizon Wireless does have v6. I see a 100.64/24 on my phone all the time. On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:11 PM John Covici wrote: > Verizon does not support ipv6 as far as I know, I have fios and they > said it was not supported. > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:20:48 -0500, > John Levine wrote: > > > >

Re: V6 still not supported

it's still a tough slog. > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG On Behalf > Of > Tim Howe > Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 2:40 PM > To: Josh Luthman ; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: V6 still not supported > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:46:56 -0500 > Josh Luthman

Re: V6 still not supported

rt it. > > Putting aside the 'zero value' idea, if you were to decide to take steps > today , what are your blockers? > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:59 AM Josh Luthman > wrote: > >> Gary, >> >> I'm the owner of the business. I answer a lot of tier 1 support calls.

Re: V6 still not supported

9, 2022 at 5:55 PM Gary E. Miller wrote: > Yo Josh! > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:46:56 -0500 > Josh Luthman wrote: > > > Customers have 0 complaints about IPv6. 0 Complaints since 2006. > > Bull. I have not complained to any corporation in the last 5 years &

Re: V6 still not supported

ons in the last couple > years when the small handful of customers who would complain that their > work VPN didn't work behind the CGNAT boxes they ran turned into a heck of > a lot MORE customers complaining. > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:48 PM Josh Luthman > wrote: > >> ISP here.

Re: V6 still not supported

IPv4 doesn't require NAT. But to answer your question, I would say most if not all of the complaints about NAT/double NAT are the Xbox saying strict nat instead of open. These complaints are super rare. On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:01 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 3/9/22 1:46 PM, Josh L

Re: V6 still not supported

ISP here. Deploying gigabit FTTH. No IPv6. Customers have 0 complaints about IPv6. 0 Complaints since 2006. On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: > On 3/9/22 1:01 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote: > > It's not just equipment vendors, it's ISPs. > > I completely agree. > > I get

Re: Starlink terminals deployed in Ukraine

As Google's ASN? https://bgp.he.net/AS36492 On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:56 AM ic wrote: > Friends who have Starlink terminals in Europe (cz) go out through AS36492. > > > On 1 Mar 2022, at 05:48, Ong Beng Hui wrote: > > > > Curious, will that be with starlink ASN then ? > > > > That throw geo

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

areas we appear > to be more interested in political wins. > > > On Feb 28, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Josh Luthman > wrote: > > According to the 477 data it's less than 50% (updated 11/1/2021 and I > think the public 477 is 2 years? behind) What makes you believe it's > nearly 100%?

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

ive to provide access to rural > areas), can you explain why nearly 100% of North Dakota is serviced by FTTH > solutions. The exceptions being the areas still run by the traditional LECs? > > I’m not to sure this should be an urban/rural debate. > > On Feb 28, 2022, at 2:53 PM,

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

t 4:46 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: > > > On 2/16/22 1:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > What is the embarrassment? > > That in the tech center of the world that we're so embarrassingly behind > the times with broadband. I'm going to get fiber in the rural Sierra Nevada >

Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN

Mine exploded since the requirement date. Some mornings I get a dozen before lunch. On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:33 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 2/17/22 11:58 AM, Sean Donelan wrote: > > > > > https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-finds-two-providers-failed-fully-implement-stirshaken-0 > > > > > >

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

Start with a neighborhood. A block. something. I'm sure there's a reason behind why something is the way it is. On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong wrote: > > > On Feb 16, 2022, at 13:13, Josh Luthman > wrote: > >  > I'll once again please ask for specific e

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

But the location has an internet service. Is it embarrassing because it should have fiber or "better connectivity" because of its location? On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 2/16/22 1:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > What is the embarrassment

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

What is the embarrassment? On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:28 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 2/16/22 1:13 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > I'll once again please ask for specific examples as I continue to see the > generic "it isn't in some parts of San Jose". > > On the

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

ed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:52 PM Owen DeLong wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 2022, at 13:14 , Josh Luthman > wrote: > > Because literally every case I've seen along these lines is someone > complaining about the coax connection is "only 100 meg when I pay for 200 > meg".

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

sac in the future. Comcast did eventually lay >> cable. I'm sure her and her neighbors aren't the only people in America >> to experience something similar. >> >> On 2/11/2022 3:14 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> > >> > >An apartment building cou

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

only one or two choices of provider too. > Of course, this is literally changing by the minute as new services are > continually being added and upgraded. > *Brandon Svec* > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:36 PM Josh Luthman > wrote: > >> OK the one example you provided ha

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

; Niagara Falls. > > This is not to say that rural America is a mecca of connectivity; there is > a long way to go all the way around regardless. But it is a direct example > as you asked for. > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:57 PM Josh Luthman > wrote: > >> >There are plen

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

>There are plenty of urban and suburban areas in America that are far worse off from a broadband perspective than “rural America”. Can you provide examples? On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:51 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > > > > On Jun 2, 2021, at 02:10 , Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > > > > > On

Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging

4.2.2.2 is definitely anycast, I've used that one since I think before Google was founded... On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:01 PM Mike Lewinski via NANOG wrote: > > What else is like that and easy to remember and isn’t 1.1.1.1 ? > > 4.2.2.1, which IIRC predates both 8.8.8.8 and 1.1.1.1. > > Muscle

Re: What do you think about the "cloudification" of mobile?

Mark, Use the 12 foot ladder to get over the 10 foot paywall: https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.economist.com%2Fbusiness%2Fwill-the-cloud-business-eat-the-5g-telecoms-industry%2F21806999 On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:12 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 1/19/22 21:52, Michael Thomas wrote: >

Re: ONTs

I would have to imagine any QOS/traffic shaping is done in the OMCI and hence would probably be in the GPON spec, g.984. I would look there. Just guessing it would hold true with XG/s/PON, NGPON, etc. Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy

Re: ONTs

That's usually an OMCI control thing on the OLT (traffic shaping, qos). Do you have a specific question in mind? Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:04 PM Dave Taht wrote: > Does anyone have

Re: Can it really be this quiet?

Likely a parallel between vacation, ie people not touching things, and things staying working. Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 2:56 PM Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: > Hi Allen, > > Ye

Re: private 5G networks?

Wifi handoff is 802.11r. Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 11/30/21 11:38 AM, Shane Ronan wrote: > > The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefit

Re: private 5G networks?

There is no guaranteed spectrum in CBRS without a PAL. That auction has come and gone, but the license holders may rent out channels in time (this is expected to happen). Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Nov 30, 2021

Re: S.Korea broadband firm sues Netflix after traffic surge

is to turn left, an ISP is going to turn left. Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:19 AM Blake Hudson wrote: > > > On 10/1/2021 8:48 AM, Sean Donelan wrote: > > South Korean Internet serv

Re: Reminder: Never connect a generator to home wiring without transfer switch

Is this conversation really taking place on NANOG? Don't backfeed power. Got it. Stupid people are going to be stupid, we won't solve it here. Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:41 AM Mel Beckman

  1   2   3   4   >