Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post

Net neutrality is an intervention of the government to protect the monopoly tactics on the part of major players. I'm confused. Can you elaborate on how net neutrality would protect major players? Do you mean major content providers? Major broadband providers? -- Hugo On Apr 25, 2014, at

RE: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post

Okay, I'm not as seasoned as a big chunk of this list, but please correct me if I'm wrong in finding this article a crock of crap. With Comcast/Netflix being in the mix and by association Cogent in the background of that there's obviously room for some heated opinions, but here goes anyway...

RE: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post

. No? -- Hugo From: Rick Astley jna...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 11:23 PM To: Hugo Slabbert Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post How

RE: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post

, -- Hugo From: Rick Astley jna...@gmail.com Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 8:45 AM To: Hugo Slabbert Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post If it were through a switch

RE: What Net Neutrality should and should not cover

#4 On QoS (ie fast lane?): In some of the articles I skimmed there was a lot of talk about fast lane traffic but what this sounds like today would be known as QoS and classification marking that would really only become a factor under instances of congestion. The tech bloggers and journalists

Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they couldenshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post

If it was Netflix connected to say Cogent and Comcast connected to Level3 you would have the same unbalanced ratios between Cogent/Level3 for the same reasons. Level3 would likely be wanting compensation from Cogent for it... ...and that would be fine as at that point we're talking about

Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post

- From: Hugo Slabbert hslabb...@stargate.ca I guess that's the question here: If additional transport directly been POPs of the two parties was needed, somebody has to pay for the links. And the answer is: at whose instance (to use an old Bell term) is that traffic moving. The answer

Re: Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3) (was: RIP Network Neutrality (was: Wow its been quiet here...

Anyway… there’s no congestion between Comcast and Level 3 connections, and we’re working collaboratively with Level 3. Given these facts, we have no reason to believe that Comcast is on their list. Sure, because Level 3 is already paying Comcast to deliver traffic to your paying customers,

Re: NANOG 61 hotel

On Tue 2014-May-13 10:32:48 -0400, Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org wrote: The Hyatt appears to have filled up. :( Anyone have alternate hotel recommendations? I put together a list when I was making my pitch to go down: ! --- ! Westin Bellevue

Re: Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3) (was: RIP Network Neutrality

So they seek new sources of revenues, and/or attempt to thwart competition any way they can. No to the first. Yes to the second. If they were seeking new sources of revenue, they'd be massively expanding into un/der served markets and aggressively growing over the top services (which are

Re: Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3) (was: RIP Network Neutrality (was: Wow its been quiet here...

So, at the end of the week, I *had* been paying $10/mb to send traffic through transit to reach the whole rest of the internet. Now, I'm paying $5+$4+$4+$5+$2, or $30, and I don't have a full set of routes, so I've still got to keep paying the transit provider as well at $10. I would like to

Re: No route to weather.gov

No luck from here. weather.gov resolves as 204.227.127.201 for me, and I have no routes for that IP. However, www.weather.gov is a CNAME for www.weather.gov.edgesuite.net. which in turn is canonical for a895.g.akamai.net. for me. That resolves to 216.23.154.72 216.23.154.75, which heads

Re: ESPN worldcup streaming traffic

The Argentina semi-final on Thursday had us at about 300% of our regular daytime peaks; other preceding games were closer to about 200%. We don't have any residential connections, just business, so today's (weekend) game didn't really register much. In terms of other streamed events: The

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

My customers do not want me to creatively find ways to extract additional money from them so as to cover *expenses that Netflix should be covering*. Nor do they want me to subsidize Netflix subscribers from the fees from non-Netflix subscribers. They want to pay a fair price for their Internet

Re: Inevitable death, was Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

Hi Brett, Why don't you simply ask me? I can only speak for myself, but I thought that's kind of what I and others were doing in replying to your messages, stating either support or counterpoints, and asking questions (?). With this being a list and your (as of recently) being a member of

Re: Muni Fiber and Politics

+1 A municipality nearby adopted this, and I personally like the model. They built out their own fiber, largely for their own purposes to connect municipal buildings and (I would assume) consolidate their internet access as well as opposed to a bunch of discrete retail-type connections.

Re: Netflix To Cogent To World

not saying it's necessarily the right argument, but most of this war is about PR anyway... -- Hugo Hugo Slabbert cell: 604.617.3133 email: hugo.slabb...@slabnet.com If kindness doesn't work, try more kindness. Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Adam Rothschild a...@latency.net

Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf

Kudo¹s is that you can just dump it in as well and get what you want. You can dump hierarchical config (the bracket stuff) into JunOS with load plus the added benefit/flexibility of the merge/replace/override options. -- Hugo On Tue 2014-Aug-05 13:42:18 +, Corey Touchet

Re: Shaw routing issue 12 Aug 2014

Outside looking in, but we did get a maintenance notice from Shaw in June for Core Router reboot to resolve fully utilized IPv4 table; let's hope for their sake they recarved TCAM while they're at it and that they don't have too many of those hiding around the network. -- Hugo On Wed

Re: RTT of ICMP TTL exceeded messages in Level3 network remains the same throughout the network

How does this technically work? What are the advantages of such setup? http://forums.juniper.net/t5/Routing/what-does-quot-icmp-tunneling-quot-mean-in-mpls-vpn/td-p/164284 http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.1/topics/usage-guidelines/mpls-configuring-icmp-message-tunneling.html

Re: Urgent

Per Michael Valentine Smith 127.0.0.1 should work. This also has the benefit of working over IPv6 (::1) without violating the ineffibility Karl referred to. Although, technically, since many gods are omnipresent, shouldn't you just be able to send the packet to any address and it will be

Re: DHCPv6 authentication

Hi, the question is simply whether anyone is using, or knows of any use of) DHCPv6 Authentication. Given the responses thus far, my guess would be no. On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:14:57 +, Templin, Fred L fred.l.temp...@boeing.com wrote: Hi, the question is simply whether anyone is using,

Re: no more Send through Gmail option

If it really was more the former, there would be a if your SPF records include:_spf.google.com, you can still do it option, IMO. Manager: So, you're saying if we just check the SPF record when they set up the account, we could still let them do it. Tech: Yes, except if they also use DKIM;

Re: 192.250.24.0/22 (as 23034) not reachable from Verizon, tinet, global crossing, XO

). -- Hugo Slabbert Stargate Connections - AS19171

Re: update

when do you think the embargo is over? ref: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q3/650 At present, public disclosure is scheduled for Wednesday, 2014-09-24 14:00 UTC. We do not expect the schedule to change, but we may be forced to revise it. Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:07:26 -0400 From: Jared

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

On Fri 2014-Oct-03 16:01:21 -0600, John Schiel jsch...@flowtools.net wrote: On 10/03/2014 03:23 PM, Keenan Tims wrote: The question here is what is authorized and what is not. Was this to protect their network from rogues, or protect revenue from captive customers. I can't imagine that any

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

On Fri 2014-Oct-03 17:21:08 -0700, Michael Van Norman m...@ucla.edu wrote: IANAL, but I believe they are. State laws may also apply (e.g. California Code - Section 502). In California, it is illegal to knowingly and without permission disrupts or causes the disruption of computer services or

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

On Fri 2014-Oct-03 16:49:49 -0700, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: On Oct 3, 2014, at 16:12 , Wayne E Bouchard w...@typo.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:23:46PM -0700, Keenan Tims wrote: The question here is what is authorized and what is not. Was this to protect their network

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

this is the distinction we need. Because it's clear that the business thing should be able to happen and the hotel thing should On October 3, 2014 10:25:22 PM EDT, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote: On Fri 2014-Oct-03 17:21:08 -0700, Michael Van Norman m...@ucla.edu wrote: IANAL, but I believe

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

On Fri 2014-Oct-03 19:45:57 -0700, Michael Van Norman m...@ucla.edu wrote: On 10/3/14 7:25 PM, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote: On Fri 2014-Oct-03 17:21:08 -0700, Michael Van Norman m...@ucla.edu wrote: IANAL, but I believe they are. State laws may also apply (e.g. California Code

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

attacking other WLANs has collateral damage. On 04-Oct-2014 8:29 am, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote: attached to the existing one. Okay: theoretically a guest could spin up a hotspot and not attach it to the hotel network at all, but I'm assuming that's a pretty tiny edge case

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

my advice breaks something, you get to keep both pieces.) On October 3, 2014 11:04:08 PM EDT, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote: On Fri 2014-Oct-03 19:45:57 -0700, Michael Van Norman m...@ucla.edu wrote: On 10/3/14 7:25 PM, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote: On Fri 2014-Oct-03 17:21:08

Re: Marriott wifi blocking

I live in a condo. I have a WLAN set up. More people move in and start setting up WLANs and the collective noise of those WLANs starts to impact the performance of my WLAN. Just because I was there first doesn't mean I have any right to start de-authing the newcomers. I don't see how

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out

Mark, Only short sighted ISP's hand out /56's to residential customers. I am curious as to why you say it is short sighted? what is the technical or otherwise any other reasoning for such statement ? 256 is *not* a big number of subnets. By restricting the number of subnets residences

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

Why not just use a browser plugin that allow you to disable v6 selectively on a per site/domain basis? Most of them just display v4/v6 information, but 4or6 allows you to quickly set a domain/site as v4 only. Ref https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4or6/?src=search -- Hugo On Oct

Re: Hijack factory: AS201640 -- MEGA - SPRED LTD / Michael A. Persaud

From our view of the table, it looks like it would be up to either 22 (not likely to happen) or GTT. They've lined the IIRs to pass 201640 through 22 via AS-HereHost. Anyone from GTT able to comment? -- Hugo -Original Message- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:59:17 -0800 From:

Re: v6 cdn problems

Possibly https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2014-November/007421.html ? -- Hugo Slabbert Network Specialist Phone: 604.606.4448tel:604.606.4448 Email: hslabb...@stargate.camailto:hslabb...@stargate.ca Stargate Connections Inc. http://www.stargate.cahttp://www.stargate.ca/ On Nov

Re: Phasing out of copper

Have some of the events around this topic going on in the US been brought up? I'm thinking specifically of things like NY/NJ, post-Sandy plans to just not replace copper and switch people to wireless or fiber instead, letting copper deployments in existing markets degrade and pushing people

Re: Verizon.net email admin?

Maybe they only allow secure, at least from some locations. That seems to be the likely case... http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-October/070532.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit

Because BFD packets can get routed across multiple hops. Unlike EBGP where you connect to a peer in a different AS and you have a direct connection, BFD packets can traverse multiple hops to reach the endpoint. Then what's this multihop knob I have available in my BGP config? Again, as Rob

Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations

There is also some work in progress to improve network performance in the Linux kernel: https://lwn.net/Articles/629155/ Preliminary, but encouraging that work is under way. -- Hugo On Tue 2015-Jan-27 11:33:16 +0400, Pavel Odintsov pavel.odint...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! Looks like

Re: Question about EX - SRX redundancy

(only). Thus either pair - 0 will work or pair - 1 will work. I wish if criss crossing worked then failure of one EX would have still made both SRX available. In current worst case scenario - failure of EX0 and SRX1 can cause full outage. Thanks. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Hugo Slabbert

Re: Rasberry pi - high density

Did I miss anything? Just a quick comparison. If those numbers are accurate, then it leans towards the NUC rather than the Pi, no? Perf: 1x i5 NUC = 10x Pi $$: 1x i5 NUC = 10x Pi Power: 1x i5 NUC = 5x Pi So...if a single NUC gives you the performance of 10x Pis at the capital cost

Re: Question about EX - SRX redundancy

In: EX0 (ae1) Two Patches to SRX0 (reth1) EX1 (ae2) Two Patches to SRX1 (reth1) with: that if one EX goes down then I cannot make use of other corresponding SRX. Do you mean that e.g. if SRX0 is the chassis cluster primary and EX0 goes down, then you can't use SRX0, but you

Re: Question about EX - SRX redundancy

3, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote: Putting the EXs in a VC and splitting your AEs across the 2x VC members takes care of that. EXVC (ae1) Two Patches to SRX0 (reth1) EXVC (ae2) Two Patches to SRX1 (reth1) ...where EXVC is a VC composed of EX0 and EX1, and ae1

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

On Wed 2015-Jun-03 13:11:34 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:35:11 -0700, Matthew Kaufman said: Ah, the IPv6 subnets are so big you can't find the hosts myth. Let's see... to find which hosts are active in IPv6 I can: - run a popular web

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

On Wed 2015-Jun-10 12:01:52 +0900, Lorenzo Colitti lore...@colitti.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote: Clients should support a verity of methods and let network operators choose the solution that fits the environment. The whole premise for not

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

I would hope that in the 'header swap' service there's as little overhead applied to the end system as possible... I'd like my apache server to answer v6 requests without having a v6 address-listening-port on my machine. Why? Honestly: why would you want to abstract v6 up into the application

Re: WiFi courses/vendors recommendation

Doubt how much PoE you'd use for the MetroWifi stuff, but for the small/medium events Wifi coverage: Ubiquiti Networks. Its cheap and it works great. Support sucks though. Just watch it here if you're expecting to plug UniFi APs into standard 802.3af/at ports and get power. When I last

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

The question that Matthew Kaufman proposed was specifically asking about app architecture deployments, so what Facebook is choosing to do is entirely germane. I'd lean more on the ipv6 evangelism side of the discussion, but: Facebook controls the whole stack and can require buy-in from their

Re: RE: AWS Elastic IP architecture

Agree with everything in your post. -- Hugo - Original Message - From: Tony Hain alh-i...@tndh.net Sent: 2015-06-01 - 16:20 To: 'Hugo Slabbert' h...@slabnet.com, 'Matt Palmer' mpal...@hezmatt.org Subject: RE: AWS Elastic IP architecture Hugo Slabbert wrote: snip On this given point

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

On Mon 2015-Jun-01 13:20:57 -0400, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Hugo Slabbert h...@slabnet.com wrote: 2. Just do it properly the first time around. I would opt for #2. sure, so would everyone... but they didn't so... what gets you

Re: [outages] CenturyLink fiber cut between Modesto, CA and San Jose, CA this AM.. Start time 4:26AM PST

Then again, maybe my tinfoil hat is too tight. Recent history would seem to indicate that, if anything, most of us were skimping a bit on tinfoil. That said, the recent cuts in CA have received a lot of attention and passed into the mainstream media; that seems, imho, a bit too public for

Re: Route leak in Bangladesh

On Wed 2015-Jul-01 17:02:13 +0200, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On 1/Jul/15 16:54, Nick Hilliard wrote: you probably want to ignore more rpsl constructs and depend solely on as-sets, aut-nums and route/route6 objects. RPSL is not going to live up to your expectations. Honestly,

Re: Fwd: [ PRIVACY Forum ] Windows 10 will share your Wi-Fi key with your friends' friends

On Mon 2015-Jul-06 18:22:47 +, Andrew Bosch andrew.bo...@elca.org wrote: Does that happen with 802.1x logins, too? No. Andrew -- Hugo h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber PGP fingerprint (B178313E): CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319 1D77 9AB1 0FFD B178 313E (also on textsecure redphone)

Re: [ PRIVACY Forum ] Windows 10 will share your Wi-Fi key with your friends' friends

On Mon 2015-Jul-06 18:17:01 +, Dan Gamble dgam...@wavebroadband.com wrote: It gives it to one degree of friends on insert social media here. So those friends can't share it again. I'm still changing my networks to EAP, though. We've been had! This is all just a giant ploy by

Re: Remember Internet-In-A-Box?

On Thu 2015-Jul-16 12:32:19 +1000, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: --snip-- You can blame the religious zealots that insisted that everything DHCP does has to also be done via RA's. This means that everyone has to implement everything twice. Something Google should have realised when they

Re: Remember Internet-In-A-Box?

On Thu 2015-Jul-16 21:19:54 +1000, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message 20150716060336.ga4...@bamboo.slabnet.com, Hugo Slabbert writes: --snip-- You can blame the religious zealots that insisted that everything DHCP does has to also be done via RA's. This means that everyone has

Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514

Seeing the same; a /19. BGPMon reports an alert at 2015-07-17 05:29 (UTC) and that it's being accepted by 2497. -- Hugo Slabbert Stargate Connections - AS19171 -Original Message- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 06:15:36 + From: Jürgen Jaritsch j...@anexia.at To: 'nanog@nanog.org' nanog

Re: Remember Internet-In-A-Box?

On Fri 2015-Jul-17 12:36:51 -0400, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:59:14AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: * Owen DeLong o...@delong.com On Jul 15, 2015, at 08:57 , Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote: This is only true for dual-stacked networks. I just

Re: EyeBall View

On Sun 2015-Oct-25 19:49:50 +, Dovid Bender wrote: All, I had an idea to create a product where we would have a host on every EyeBall network. Customers could then connect to these hosts and check connectivity back to their network. For instance you may want to see

Re: DDoS mitigation for ISPs

On Thu 2015-Oct-29 08:42:31 -0700, Mike wrote: Hello, Is there any DDoS mitigation service provider that can scrub traffic for an ISP network? I have an ASN and BGP and my own netblocks, and I have a 1gbps pipe. I was thinking the scenario would be during

Re: DDoS mitigation for ISPs

Alternatively: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ddos+protection Actually I did the google thing first and followed up with several of the top results, and not once did I see anyone offering a bgp tunnel + scrub which is why I asked. I did get some good off list responses however, thanks all. Mike-

Re: IPv6 Irony.

Couldn't tell you: An error occurred while processing your request. Reference #50.b301e78e.1445526611.3125864 Masataka: Is there an alt link? It sounds like it could be an interesting read. -- Hugo h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber PGP fingerprint (B178313E): CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319

Re: Google Captcha on web searches

On Tue 2015-Nov-10 09:28:09 -0800, Joseph Jenkins wrote: We started getting a Google Captcha for our web searches this morning. Does anyone have contact info for Google so that I can contact them and figure out where the traffic is coming from on my side or

Re: Another puck.nether.net Outage?

The problem seems to have been with mailman. I pinged Jared OOB and he responded this that it's fixed. I'd sent something to outages-request prior to test, and that came through this morning. -- Hugo h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber also on Signal From: Christopher Morrow

Re: BCOP Wiki Logo Missing

On Thu 2015-Oct-08 15:26:18 +, Nicholas Warren wrote: Doesn't the NANOG maintain that wiki? I remember the NANOG logo being on there at one time. You want some salt in that wound? http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2015-September/079522.html Thank

Re: ultradns / neustar outage?

On Thu 2015-Oct-15 17:46:19 -0400, Curtis Generous wrote: Our DNS is hosted by UltraDNS, and are unreachable. Anyone else impacted? Lots of people; primarily East Coast. This is being discussed on outages as well. https://twitter.com/search?q=ultradns From an

Re: Possible Sudden Uptick in ASA DOS?

On Wed 2015-Jul-08 16:58:24 +, Mark Mayfield mark.mayfi...@cityofroseville.com wrote: Come in this morning to find one failover pair of ASA's had the primary crash and failover, then a couple hours later, the secondary crash and failover, back to the primary. Another pair running the

Re: DDoS appliances reviews needed

On Thu 2015-Aug-27 02:48:31 -0700, alvin nanog nano...@mail.ddos-mitigator.net wrote: --snip-- defending against DNS is almost equally trivial - 53/udp is used for dns queries ... ...except when it's not. TCP is an accepted transport for DNS queries and necessary for response

Re: Weekly Routing Table Report

BGP routing table entries examined: 30167 ... Percentage of available address space announced:7.0 Percentage of allocated address space announced:7.0 erm...y'all missing some prefixes on the collector for the report? --

Re: Microsoft blocking mail

On Thu 2015-Sep-17 13:22:29 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:14:21 -0400, Josh Luthman said: Well it's not a form and it redirects you to the support home page... https://support.microsoft.com/en-us You didn't have NoScript or similar

Re: Microsoft blocking mail

On Thu 2015-Sep-17 12:44:58 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote: Link doesn't work as one would expect. ...what is the expected behaviour, and how is it different from actual behaviour? -- Hugo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Microsoft blocking mail

This is the front door for outlook.com delivery issues: http://mail.live.com/mail/postmaster.aspx More specifically http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx and starting a ticket at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866. If it's something related to protection.outlook.com, NDRs

Re: Do you have INOC-DBA set up? (was: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115)

On Tue 2015-Sep-29 11:19:57 -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote: : Show of hands: who has it set up, correctly, right now? I had this in my to-do, and this thread poked me again to get on with it. Sadly, https://inoc-dba-web.pch.net/inoc-dba/console.cgi?op=new_account gives me:

Re: Routes leaked by AS393742 via AS16397

On Wed 2015-Sep-30 17:43:40 -0400, Robert Webb wrote: https://ipinfo.io/AS393742 ...I'm so behind the times; my response would have been: $ finger 393...@peeringdb.com General Network Information --- Network Name : Biyort USA Corp Name

Re: IPv6 and Android auto conf

On Mon 2015-Sep-28 17:33:46 +0530, Anurag Bhatia wrote: Hello everyone I recently got IPv6 working at home LAN. My Android device (Google Nexus 5) is connected via wifi to LAN and LAN's core router is Map2N . I have a /64 on the LAN

Re: IPv6 and Android auto conf

On Mon 2015-Sep-28 21:15:02 +0530, Anurag Bhatia <m...@anuragbhatia.com> wrote: Hi Hugo (My reply in line) On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Hugo Slabbert <h...@slabnet.com> wrote: On Mon 2015-Sep-28 17:33:46 +0530, Anurag Bhatia <m...@anuragbhatia.com> wrote: Hel

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On Thu 2015-Oct-01 18:28:52 -0700, Damian Menscher via NANOG wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Matthew Newton wrote: On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:42:57PM +, Todd Underwood wrote: > it's just a new addressing protocol that happens to not work

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

My apologies; missed the anchor for some reason and just got the top bits of the doc. -- Hugo h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber also on TextSecure & RedPhone From: Damian Menscher <dam...@google.com> -- Sent: 2015-10-02 - 08:45 > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Hug

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On Fri 2015-Oct-02 09:43:40 -0700, Hugo Slabbert <h...@slabnet.com> wrote: My apologies; missed the anchor for some reason and just got the top bits of the doc. -- Hugo h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber also on TextSecure & RedPhone From: Damian Menscher <dam...@google

Re: cisco.com unavailable

Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affected just for Rostelecom? No problems here from either v4 or v6. -- Hugo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

On Thu 2015-Dec-10 13:32:25 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said: On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny wrote: > is that still net neutrality? who cares? mobile was excepted from

Re: How to update IPv6 geolocation data? Google sites blocked.

On Wed 2016-Jan-06 16:23:21 -0800, David Sotnick wrote: Really? Nobody here knows how one goes about updating IPv6 geolocation data? Our /48 is still being denied access to Google sites due to unknown geolocation. Help? John Lewis responded with some info[1], which

Re: de-peering for security sake

Just in case I missed the /s on there: > Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used. It does and it isn't. http://www.x-arf.org/ -- Hugo h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber also on Signal From: Clayton Zekelman -- Sent: 2015-12-25 - 14:12 >

Re: Broadband Router Comparisons

From: Michael Thomas -- Sent: 2015-12-27 - 08:49 > > > On 12/26/2015 11:37 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: >> Providing security updates is just a cost, there is no upside, because >> these boxes sit in a closet, unloved until they stop working, and >> they're thrown out

Re: de-peering for security sake

On Fri 2015-Dec-25 08:55:24 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Hmm, has anyone at all kept count of the number of times such a discussion has started up in just the last year... Not on an ongoing basis, but I was curious as well, so a quick mailbox search for 2015:

Re: Broadband Router Comparisons

2015 09:43 AM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: From: Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> -- Sent: 2015-12-27 - 08:49 On 12/26/2015 11:37 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: Providing security updates is just a cost, there is no upside, because these boxes sit in a closet, unloved until t

Re: Broadband Router Comparisons

"James Downs" <e...@egon.cc> wrote: > On Dec 27, 2015, at 09:43, Hugo Slabbert <h...@slabnet.com> wrote: > Hence: https://on.google.com/hub/ The device looks cool, and sounds cool, but what data does google end up with, and what remote management can they do? Their po

Re: Netflix stuffing data on pipe

On Tue 2015-Dec-29 21:17:51 -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: The second part. Fixed wireless is not even on their radar. On Dec 29, 2015 9:16 PM, "Matt Hoppes" wrote: So they are trying to stuff every last bit as an end device modulates up and

Re: Issues via HE into Chicago?

On Tue 2015-Nov-17 15:43:40 -0600, Josh Reynolds wrote: Anyone else seeing massive issues? To what destination? [outages] had some info re: a comcast issue in that area that has been reported as now resolved. -- Hugo h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber PGP

Deploying IPv6 in an ISP network [ was: Best Source for ARIN Region /24 ]

On Mon 2016-Jan-11 20:16:21 +, Shon Elliott wrote: I also am interested in where people are finding blocks of /22 or smaller just in case. We have some blocks from Level 3, but eventually, we're going to be out. That being said, we did get our IPv6 /32

Re: RE: Deploying IPv6 in an ISP network [ was: Best Source for ARIN Region /24 ]

he IPv6 basics, just not real plan on deploying it on a service provider > network. > > Kind Regards, > Shon Elliott, KK6TOO > unWired Broadband, Inc. > www.getunwired.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: Hugo Slabbert [mailto:h...@slabnet.com] > Sent: Monday

Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4

es.com/ / https://twitter.com/ipv6excuses -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

the whole line of reasoning, not just the "it's easy to get those blocks" section at the end. -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention

ixes from transits". No? oh, so I didn't misunderstand.. that makes 'backup isp' less useful, no? -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Thinking Methodically about building a PoC

xample: instead of defining a problem in step 1, you can define a product, and after knowing what is expected from that product, you can then move to background research, etc. Hope that helps. Rafael -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on

Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?

is a service provider any different? I understand the discretion involved in your question, but could we clarify exactly what presentation is being discussed so those of us who were not present at NANOG67 can also participate in an informed way? --Matt -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xm

Re: RPKI and offline routes

bed in the ROA, and any more specific prefix, should not be used in a routing context. With the most detail in RFC6483[4]. Yes/no? Cheers matthias -- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, The

Re: Public DNS64

On Mon 2016-May-30 11:45:11 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: In message

  1   2   3   >