11.0.0.0/24 and 12.0.0.0/24, for point to point links.
--
Dan White
On 02/07/10 15:21 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
Makes one wonder what dead:beef::/32 and c0ff:ee00::/32 will go for? :)
Even more off topic:
No match found for cafe:d00d:4:cafe:babe::/32
--
Dan White
) was not enabled out of the box. I needed to add
inet_protocols = ipv4, ipv6 to enable it.
--
Dan White
the years have
repeatedly and conclusively demonstrated.
has the appearance of you struggling to hold on to an idea that may have
been more true in the past, and less true today, as is evident based on the
input from other list participants.
--
Dan White
of breach of contract.
Of course, said block should clearly fall within ARIN's domain, backed up
with a signed contract from the original party.
--
Dan White
in a difference conference call.
I'll note that they just got bought out, which may change their priorities,
for better or worse.
--
Dan White
, depending on your
jurisdiction).
If your PBX is SIP based, you might be victim of a SIP registration hijack,
which are on the rise, based on traffic we've been seeing in our network.
--
Dan White
as time goes on and we as a community should figure out how
to deal with their transition from pure content to perhaps some day
pure service.
How we deal with it is to create a viable distributed version of it.
--
Dan White
probably issue an rfc early next year.
Hopefully someone remembers to call it the Postel Historical Institute[*].
[*] RFC 1607
--
Dan White
more addresses when
they're needed.
--
Dan White
of
truth, but that approach is not very appealing to us.
--
Dan White
On 21/10/10 14:53 -0400, Joe Maimon wrote:
Dan White wrote:
Or are the two simply not inter-communicable?
I think that's the $64K question. Do you wait to roll out v6 until you
start seeing v6-only hosts start popping up?
When do you think that will happen and in what percentages of your
: $5/month)
Owen
Step 2:
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-issued/2010-October/000675.html
~$ whois 50.128.0.0 | grep 'NetRange\|OrgName'
NetRange: 50.128.0.0 - 50.255.255.255
OrgName:Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc
Step 3:
Profit!
--
Dan White
to the end hosts in v6, the concept of a
standardized MTU should go away, and open up much larger MTUs. However,
that may not happen until dual stacked v4/v6 goes away.
--
Dan White
it was pulled... :) Not sure that works in any windows (or other OS's for that
matter) however.
Their A records on Sunday were:
#46.51.186.222 wikileaks.org
#46.151.171.90 wikileaks.org
--
Dan White
at Netgear?
--
Dan White
an accurate
measurement of the service you're providing.
We've learned to pick our fights, and this isn't one of them.
--
Dan White
, since the customer is
unlikely to get support when calling the vendor.
At this point, I'd be happy with two good options (two different vendors)
to recommend. So far, D-link is looking good.
--
Dan White
that would get those addresses to
be significant in the larger picture.
I do agree that v4 will continue to survive for quite some time though, but
not at the expense of v6 adoption.
--
Dan White
or in browser implementations,
announcement had to be delayed, providing a small group of attackers a
larger window than necessary to compromise information.
--
Dan White
.
--
Dan White
to reach some sites.
--
Dan White
dedicated to providing rural and urban customers with
the HIGHEST QUALITY products and services. We will enhance our producers' profitability,
EXCEED customer expectations and keep our cooperative financially STRONG.
--
Dan White
.
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=334articleid=20121002_11_A1_CUTLIN325691
A layer 7 failure. Make sure all members of your organization are aware
of your plans.
--
Dan White
or admit to any trouble, and stated that the service
levels for these MPLS circuits allowed for 75-80ms and I don't recall if
that was one way or round trip. He said that was to allow for coast to
coast latency scenarios. Delay returned to typical levels about 4 days
later, without explanation.
--
Dan
of data closer to the user resulting in far
better performance.
Does anybody know of any other CDN providers that offer similar caches?
Netflix does as well:
https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect/hardware
The last time I asked, they required 5GB/s of peak traffic to consider you.
--
Dan White
On 02/04/13 08:33 -0600, Dan White wrote:
On 02/04/13 14:03 +, Kyle Camilleri wrote:
Some CDN providers such as Akamai and Google (often called Global Google
Cache) are offering caches to ISPs. It is very convenient for small ISPs
to alleviate bandwidth towards the provider, but also
http://update.nai.com/Products/CommonUpdater is returning an html generated
error (Unable to forward this request at this time), when connecting via a
recently allocated IP block.
If someone from McAfee is monitoring this list, please contact me off-list.
Thank You,
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Chris Meidinger wrote:
Hi,
This is a pretty moronic question, but I've been searching RFC's
on-and-off for a couple of weeks and can't find an answer. So I'm
hoping someone here will know it offhand.
I've been looking through RFC's trying to find a clear statement that
having two interfaces
Philip Lavine wrote:
To all,
I am sure this has been asked 10 to the 1 millionth power times, however may be
the rules have changed. I am looking to set up a really small ISP with a few
/24's. I want to host DNS as well. Is there any whitepapers/howtos/best
practices on setting up multihomed
Hi Mark,
Are there any high level operational details you could share?
Specifically, are you using any commercial/OSS software to handle the
(automated?) periodic key roll overs?
Are you using bind? Do you have any experience or suggestions on what
version to start with?
Given that phase
Have you spoken with your provider? They should be giving you options,
like changing your static address, or null routing the attackers
upstream, or perhaps blocking port 80 to you, to limit your ingress traffic.
- Dan
Charles Wyble wrote:
I did. Still getting pounded.
John Peach wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Dan White wrote:
Have you spoken with your provider? They should be giving you options,
like changing your static address, or null routing the attackers
upstream, or perhaps blocking port 80 to you, to limit your ingress
traffic.
For DSL? I've never had that kind
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Dan White wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Dan White wrote:
Have you spoken with your provider? They should be giving you options,
like changing your static address, or null routing the attackers
upstream, or perhaps blocking port 80 to you, to limit your
Jamon Camisso wrote:
Could someone from cogent please contact me offlist?
status.cogentco.com shows no problems but we're seeing prolonged and
high packet losses from multiple locations.
We are also experiencing similar issues. Our site had scheduled
maintenance last night and we were
Dan White wrote:
Jamon Camisso wrote:
Could someone from cogent please contact me offlist?
status.cogentco.com shows no problems but we're seeing prolonged and
high packet losses from multiple locations.
We are also experiencing similar issues. Our site had scheduled
maintenance last
Jorge Amodio wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Warren Baileywbai...@gci.com wrote:
In other news, Nigerian Scams at an all time low this morning/afternoon.
Since some time ago I've been getting them through .cn sites and new variants
like I won the $500K Toyota Bingo ?? ...
to transfer me to the appropriate person, the
call is dropped.
Thanks!
Ken
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@olp.net
http://www.btcbroadband.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 17/08/09 14:19 -0700, Darren Bolding wrote:
I believe this is operational content, but may well be better asked
somewhere else. I would love to have a pointer to another list/website.
See the linux-net mailing list:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/
--
Dan White
signature.asc
of
the internet) over the next 50 years?
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
On 05/10/09 18:35 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:13:37 CDT, Dan White said:
a publicly routeable stateless auto configured address is no less
secure than a publicly routeable address assigned by DHCP. Security is, and
should be, handled by other means
On 05/10/09 22:28 -0400, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:13:37 -0400, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
I don't understand. You're saying you have overlapping class boundaries
in your network?
No. What I'm saying is IPv6 is supposed to be the new, ground-breaking,
unimaginably huge
On 05/10/09 22:53 -0400, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:55:35 -0400, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
All of the items in the above list are true of DHCP. ...
In an IPv4 world (which is where DHCP lives), it's much MUCH harder to
track assignments -- I don't share my DHCP logs
, and gets a static address, just
like with IPv4.
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
doing, or considering doing?
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
love to see IPv6 in place I am
sure. ;) Routing IPv6 is going to require one heck of a thinking re-
adjustment. Would be nice to just leave IPv6 in the premises, and keep IPv4
for routing.
Reputation lists will just be on the /64, /56 and /48 boundaries, rather
than IPv4 /32.
--
Dan White
BTC
router next year that will handle IPv6.
Ask Pannaway if they can bridge traffic (either ATM PVC, or Ethernet
QinQ/VLAN per subscriber) up to a broadband aggregator, like a Redback or
Cisco.
--
Dan White
IPv6 pass through.
I have little doubt that Pannaway could implement IPv6, they just need to
get enough demand from customers to make it worth their while.
--
Dan White
I can't offer any knowledgeable advice about PPPoA/E. We have never used
it ourselves.
On 14/10/09 22:16 -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
So you're saying moving away from PPPoA/E and just going bridged?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Dan White [mailto:dwh...@olp.net]
Ask Pannaway
.
--
Dan White
or redirected to your SMTP server.
--
Dan White
in an emergency (e.g. when RADIUS goes down).
--
Dan White
.
--
Dan White
On 25/11/09 14:17 -0800, David Conrad wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Dan White wrote:
Contact ICANN/IANA and plead with them to stop assigning any more resources
to said ISP.
ICANN/IANA doesn't assign resources to ISPs.
Indirectly they're responsible for assignment of IP address
press
and even corrective action. In particular, Network Solutions' attempt to
at this at the .com level was corrected. Of course I don't know what, if
any, ICANN pressure has to do with that, but the flash light practice was
apparently successful.
--
Dan White
on each PON, if deploying in dense mode.
Another big advantage is in CO equipment. A 4-PON blade in a cabinet is
going to support on the order of 256 ONTs.
--
Dan White
On 01/12/09 14:33 -0500, Paul Wall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
All valid points. Deploying a strand to each customer from the CO/Cabinet
is a good way to future proof your plant.
I would argue that every customer is entitled to duplex fiber
is key.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
Someone else mentioned Assentria, which we also use for our contact closure
alarms. We configure a north bound SNMP interface towards our central trap
management system (Vaonet).
--
Dan White
Customer Services team at ripe-...@ripe.net. (You cannot reply
to this email.)
Regards,
Denis Walker
Business Analyst
RIPE NCC Database Group
Referencing MNTNER objects in the RIPE Database:
maint-rgnet
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax
and egress traffic.
Just because it's down for you, doesn't mean it's down for everyone.
--
Dan White
type approach, but that gets us back to (almost) where we
are today. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
--
Jim Wininger
jwinin...@ifncom.net
--
Dan White
is:
67.217.144.0/20
and SORBS had us listed within a larger black listed range, like the
containing /12. It took us weeks to be removed from that range (or to have
an exception added). This was probably a couple of years ago, or early last
year.
--
Dan White
, where
you relay youtube dns queries to another DNS resolver in your area that
does not experience the problem:
http://seclists.org/nanog/2011/May/21
--
Dan White
172.0.0.0-172.15.255.255 was allocated on 2012-08-20 to ATT Internet
Services.
--
Dan White
reports, beginning in July.
On 08/23/12 00:29 -0500, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. wrote:
Dan,
Can you provide a link to support this?
If this is true, I wonder how this will work.
Otis
-Original Message-
From: Dan White [mailto:dwh...@olp.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:24 AM
To: nanog
for the
month, in near real-time. We've implemented a monthly bandwidth quota, and
have that discussion up front with new customers (and sent letters to
existing customers) so that they can choose the appropriate tiered service,
based on their expected usage patterns.
--
Dan White
?
Performing a ping with a large packet size '-s', and/or with packet
fragmentation turned off '-M do' have been our primary tools for finding
MTU (layer 2 and layer 3) mismatches.
--
Dan White
, and maintaining the
document much more slim.
I'd love to use something like metapost, but have yet to find any network
diagram oriented libraries. Do you have any examples that you could
recommend?
--
Dan White
they probably
don't need. It's been my experience that if you tell someone you're taking
away something, they tend to value it even if they don't know what it is.
--
Dan White
-snmp running on the freebsd box.
--
Dan White
load balancer).
I wanted to see what experienced folks think is a reliable tracking target.
Any comments are much appreciated.
Publicly advertised DNS server IPs should be good, such as google's 8.8.8.8
and 8.8.4.4.
--
Dan White
not a reference. And it reeks of security-consultant-gamesmanship.
If you've had a look at Gadi's paper that he intends to present, then
discuss with him where you feel he's infringing.
--
Dan White
) to perform your searches via the
IMAP SEARCH command and let the server feed you the appropriate emails
containing the keyword(s) you're searching for.
--
Dan White
On 20/02/10 12:15 -0800, Mike Lyon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote:
On 20/02/10 11:56 -0800, Mike Lyon wrote:
Howdy Folks,
What are people using these days to suck down an IMAP account, search it
and
then export the search results? Any suggestions
when finding the most recently created files in your
filesystem.
If you suspect there's a running process doing it, look through your /proc
directory, like in /proc/pid/environ, /proc/pid/cmdline, etc.
--
Dan White
stack today. When you've run out of IPv4 addresses for new end
users, set them up an IPv6 HTTP proxy, SMTP relay and DNS resolver and/or
charge a premium for IPv4 addresses when you start to sweat.
--
Dan White
On 06/03/10 23:36 +1030, Mark Newton wrote:
On 06/03/2010, at 1:10 AM, Dan White wrote:
On 05/03/10 12:39 +, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
I *wholeheartedly* agree with Owen's assessment. Even spending time
trying to calculate a rebuttal to his numbers is better spent moving
pingtest.net, but
haven't gotten any responses from them about it. Has anyone else had any
success signing up for it?
--
Dan White
with that by balancing our lease times with our MTTR for a
failed server.
--
Dan White
--
Dan White
On 19/03/10 17:10 -0700, Mike wrote:
David W. Hankins wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:22:06AM -0500, Dan White wrote:
The servers stop balancing their addresses, and one server starts to
exhibit 'peer holds all free leases' in its logs, in which case we need to
restart the dhcpd process
firm and that was a stellar failure.
I've tried many different searches but a search for 'active directory,
openldap, authentication, proxy, pass-through' either gives information
for Squid or all go back to the same OpenLDAP Administrators guide from
which I am missing something.
--
Dan White
devices. The Next Big (Nth) Thing will. Do you feel that you have a perfect
Crystal Ball, or do you want to start hedging your bets now?
--
Dan White
On 31/03/10 23:18 -0400, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Dan White wrote:
From a content perspective, you may be right. Those with a quickly
dwindling supply of v4 addresses will most likely use what they have left
for business customers, and for content.
However, there will be a time when
in this game.
--
Dan White
deployments so as to minimize the impact of IPv4 exhaustion.
here we disagree. Im all in favor of demonstrating 85% utilization
of the IPv4 address pool before handing out new address space.
--
Dan White
their apps to extended addresses to avoid
dealing with NAT bogosity and resulting tech support calls costs.
+10 years.
Step 5: remove NATs.
This is a good example of why patching v4 or trying to maintain backwards
compatibility is not practical.
--
Dan White
On 08/04/10 13:27 -0400, Joe wrote:
Just wondering if this was a Fat fingered mistake or intentional...
If it was a mistake, I hope he fares a bit better than his counterparts
in other Chinese industries...
--
Dan White
and pragmatic leaders
(drc, jc, et.al.) are correct, then IPv4 will be around for a very
long time.
What, if any, plan exists to improve the utilization density of the
existant IPv4 pool?
I believe your question is based on an outdated assumption.
--
Dan White
On 08/04/10 18:00 +, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 12:50:26PM -0500, Dan White wrote:
On 08/04/10 17:17 +, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
in the IPv4 space, it was common to have a min allocation size of
a /20 ... or 4,096 addresses ... and yet
is going to work in many cases, such
as from Hotel wireless networks.
--
Dan White
.
Note that similar text was present in RFC2462, all the way back in Dec 1998.
So somebody's 13 years late to the party.
For more information, see RFC 6104 for a comprehensive problem
statement (rogue routers), and RFC 6105 for a proposed solution.
--
Dan White
?contact_type=ip
isn't of much help as it assumes the problem is google.com redirection.
Are there any contacts at Youtube who could provide some assistance?
Thanks,
--
Dan White
On 21/04/11 15:46 -0700, Carl Rosevear wrote:
Quova, Maxmind, and others all return accurate results for everything of
ours I have tested. Some of the IPs in question have been properly assigned
or delegated to us for several years in whois. But yeah, thanks for the
input... I actually hadn't
it at this point.
--
Dan White
.
If you're dealing with business customers, then your usage versus wasted
ratio is much higher and less of a concern, but what's the point? Are you
trying to cut down on a large broadcast domain?
--
Dan White
/smart-questions.html
Deric doesn't know he wants to.. but he *wants* to. *Right Now*. :)
And along similar lines - How to Report Bugs Effectively:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html
--
Dan White
hosts.
--
Dan White
accepted root certs to their builds in the interest of speeding this
up. The CA system is fundamentally flawed.
Paul
--
Dan White
information?
Does anyone have more information about this? We received a customer
complaint yesterday, around this time period, with packet loss to 8.8.8.8
(our traceroutes to 8.8.8.8 typically route through Level 3 in Dallas).
--
Dan White
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
