John Reinhagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], also sprach "Dan
Harkless":
The last time I remember IMAP support coming up was quite awhile ago, and
the commentary (from Richard Coleman??) was that IMAP support probably
wouldn't be forthcoming because IMAP would
clemensF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, your thoughts really make it clear how much potential work is here.
Sounds like most of the issues arise from cache handling, though. Perhaps a
first implementation could do everything live on the IMAP server.
whenever making copies... that's a
On 11 September 2000 at 15:01, "Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
multiple users sharing a single nmh folder (with unique sequences) has to be
a pretty darn rare situation
IMO, it's rare because people these days don't think of being able to
do it; they're used to GUI mail front-ends that
Neil W Rickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That brings up another point (perhaps a bug?)
Msg-Protect: 664
(from my '.mh_profile') is ignored on "Fcc:". Thus if a folder
is shared between users, messages recorded by "Fcc:" are not
shareable -- they get 600 permissions, which is
IMO, it's rare because people these days don't think of being able to
do it; they're used to GUI mail front-ends that don't allow (?) this
kind of thing.
Use an IMAP client recently? "Shared" mailboxes are already part of
the IMAP specification. Most reasonable ones deal with them just
fine.
