Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences]

[Dan Harkless]

clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yeah, your thoughts really make it clear how much potential work is here.
> > Sounds like most of the issues arise from cache handling, though.  Perhaps a
> > first implementation could do everything live on the IMAP server.
> 
> whenever making copies... that's a generalisation of malloc and garbage
> collection.

Even across multiple invocations?  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless                   | To prevent SPAM contamination, please 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW.  Thank you.