Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In any case, who has CVS access to mhost?
>
> I used to, but my ssh key is no longer working.
>
> > Does anyone have access to
> > the actual CVSROOT?
>
> At least Doug Morris, but he seems to be not around. Dan Harkless might
> too, but might have
Geoff Raye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>% packf `pick +l/nmh -after 03/17/2001 -and -search nmh-workers`
>http://www.raye.com/nmh-workers-20010317-20020509.gz
>aka
>http://lnk.to/archive
>So, that's just nmh-workers. Should be a start. Should be complete, as
>far as that list.
I'm pretty sure
On May 10, 2002 at 11:40, Neil W Rickert wrote:
> If development of nmh is languishing, it it because nobody is doing
> much of the work. When Richard Coleman was in charge, things moved
> along. But since then, nobody has been in charge. A few people have
> stepped in and managed things for a
[Doug Porter]
>Does anyone have a full archive of nmh-workers and nmh-bugs going
>back to at least March 17, 2001 (the last commit)? I would like
>to be able to go through the list archives to look for forgotten
>patches and any issues that may have been raised. I have tried
>to get SmartList to
On May 10, 2002 at 16:04, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> ell, _since_ you asked ... I've already submitted it for a project n
> savannah.gnu.org. By that, I mean that I've created a developer's
> account for myself and gone through the registration process to host a
> new project. The project managers
>> I've already got it (thanks to Doug Morris for putting it up today!)
>
>Now what?
ell, _since_ you asked ... I've already submitted it for a project n
savannah.gnu.org. By that, I mean that I've created a developer's
account for myself and gone through the registration process to host a
new p
On May 10, 2002 at 12:47, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >If we are really going to move the CVS
> >repository this should be helpful:
> >
> > http://hackers.progeny.com/~dsp/nmh-cvs.tar.gz>
> >
> >I found that on ftp.mhost.com today when I went poking around.
>
> I've already got it (thanks to Doug
>If development of nmh is languishing, it it because nobody is doing
>much of the work.
See the previous emails; it's not that nobody is _doing_ the work, it's
that it's NOT POSSIBLE currently for anyone to do the work.
--Ken
>> I tried. The basic problem was simple: Doug and I couldn't get
>> me working repository access. There was simply some
>> strangeness between our versions of OpenSSH that made it not
>> work, no matter how much we tried.
>
>What version were you running? I see that mononoke.mhost.com is
>runn
Hey folks, nothing is served by this increasingly heated bickering.
There seems to be a general consensus on the following:
o People would like to see work continue on nmh in a timely fashion,
o People would like to get a new release together,
o CVS is a good tool and people would like t
Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Could everyone please just settle down? You all are so worried
>about moving the project to a new location, but there does not
>seem to be any immediate need for that. Ftp access and anonymous
>CVS access to nmh still work. Take what source exists and
>a
Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Listen buddy, I'm going to say it again, SLOWLY this time.
Thank you, I so clearly need remediation.
> I tried. The basic problem was simple: Doug and I couldn't get
> me working repository access. There was simply some
> strangeness between our ve
>Back around December people got all excited talking about a new
>release, rolling in patches that are floating around, and taking
>care of issues in the TODO file, but I have not seen >any<
>progress on that front. Until people start to do some real work,
>moving the repository so that it can ju
Anders Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Ken and Earl. It's high time we get the
> sourcres under a more stable control. I'd say go for Savannah
> of sourceforge. I don't really care which, as log as I can get
> access to it!
Could everyone please just settle down? Y
On May 10, 2002 at 09:44, John Summerfield wrote:
> Those who prefer Savanna?
+1 for Savannah.
--ewh
> On Thursday 09 May 2002 06:48 am, Anders Eriksson wrote:
> > I have to agree with Ken and Earl. It's high time we get the sourcres
> > under a more stable control. I'd say go for Savannah of sourceforge.
> > I don't really care which, as log as I can get access to it!
> >
> > Is it time for a co
On Thursday 09 May 2002 06:48 am, Anders Eriksson wrote:
> I have to agree with Ken and Earl. It's high time we get the sourcres
> under a more stable control. I'd say go for Savannah of sourceforge.
> I don't really care which, as log as I can get access to it!
>
> Is it time for a community poll
On May 9, 2002 at 12:40, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >Consider the motion seconded. Please lets move it to "savannah.gnu.org",
> >second choice, "SourceForge".
>
> I agree ... as long as we have the ability to make regular, offsite
> repository backups. I will gladly offer this service if no one
>
> It's funny that whenever this comes up, the first post is "well, it's
> clear Doug isn't doing this anymore". I am quite a few time zones away
> from most of y'all so when discussions come up, I'm usually in bed and
> don't see them until the next morning.
24 hr responses aren't the problem.
Shantonu Sen wrote:
>At least Doug Morris, but he seems to be not around. Dan Harkless might
>too, but might have the same private key rejection.
I'm migrating over to a new system, and trying to get the lists and
the cvs running on both. My main issue at this point is making sure
mail is safe (C
On May 3, 2002 at 22:55, Scott Lipcon wrote:
> I'm willing to create a new CVS repository, and spend the time merging our
> changes in to mhost if/when we get access to that again.
Is there interest in including the cygwin patches I posted a few days
ago?
> Ruud de Rooij started a project on S
I agree.
I'm willing to create a new CVS repository, and spend the time merging our
changes in to mhost if/when we get access to that again.
Ruud de Rooij started a project on SourceForge a while ago.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmh/
Doug Porter posted a few reasons why not to use Sou
I too would like to see work continue on nmh. I'd like to see the
stuff that I contributed to integrated in to a new release. It seems
clear that Doug is no longer able to be the maintainer for this, so
someone else should pick it up. If that means forking the CVS, so
be it. Let's get somethin
> In any case, who has CVS access to mhost?
I used to, but my ssh key is no longer working.
> Does anyone have access to
> the actual CVSROOT?
At least Doug Morris, but he seems to be not around. Dan Harkless might
too, but might have the same private key rejection.
> Someone (ken maybe) menti
The topic of the status of nmh has come up a few times in the last
several months. I'd like to bring it up again, because it doesn't
appear that its going anywhere.
My motivation is that I've come across a few things I'd like to see
fixed in nmh, and I've had some free time recently, so I'm re
25 matches
Mail list logo
