Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I've taken out military zones, and this appears to have fixed up some
> | of the errant parsing when compared to 1.0.4. Dan, can you do
> | another diff to check this (I just checked in the changes). Also, you
> | will still see many differing lines be
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, also sprach Iain
MacDonnell:
>Jerry Peek writes:
>: On 8 September 2000 at 20:05, Iain MacDonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: > I'm just saying that an
>: > IMAP imeplementation could ignore sequences except for "unseen".
>:
>: I haven't thought a lot about inte
Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How do IMAP's subfolders differs from nmh's, e.g. `refile
> > +inbox/tasks'. Or are you just saying nmh's IMAP support would include
> > IMAP's subfolders?
>
> I'm saying we have lots of options:
>
> IMAP folder on Local nmh
> host mail.foo.com
Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here are some thoughts about IMAP support in nmh. Wherever you see "should",
> read it as "Shantonu thinks it should":
I don't know enough about IMAP to have any thoughts on some of your points,
but...
> 2) Multiple access points: Since IMAP is based o
Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Looking at the ChangeLog, I see you also fixed the date-parsing bugs in your
> > new dtimep.lex. Were military time zones supported in the old dtimep.lex?
> > Did they cause a problem there? If not, why not? [Just want to make sure
> > removing mili
Jerry Peek writes:
: On 8 September 2000 at 20:05, Iain MacDonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > I'm just saying that an
: > IMAP imeplementation could ignore sequences except for "unseen".
:
: I haven't thought a lot about internals here... but couldn't an IMAP
: implementation just store its s
On 8 September 2000 at 20:05, Iain MacDonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just saying that an
> IMAP imeplementation could ignore sequences except for "unseen".
I haven't thought a lot about internals here... but couldn't an IMAP
implementation just store its sequences in the context file (b
Scott Blachowicz writes:
: On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 03:35:54PM +0100, Iain MacDonnell wrote:
: >
: > Eww, adding sequences could get complex. Whilst I suppose it might be nice
: > for some, do we really need it?
:
: I would think so...for my part, I use the "unseen" sequence a lot.
Yeah, but unse
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 03:35:54PM +0100, Iain MacDonnell wrote:
>
> Eww, adding sequences could get complex. Whilst I suppose it might be nice
> for some, do we really need it?
I would think so...for my part, I use the "unseen" sequence a lot. I
also have a "picks" script:
#!/bin/sh
Shantonu Sen writes:
: > How do IMAP's subfolders differs from nmh's, e.g. `refile
: > +inbox/tasks'. Or are you just saying nmh's IMAP support would include
: > IMAP's subfolders?
:
: I'm saying we have lots of options:
:
: IMAP folder on Local nmh
: host mail.foo.com folder
:
> How do IMAP's subfolders differs from nmh's, e.g. `refile
> +inbox/tasks'. Or are you just saying nmh's IMAP support would include
> IMAP's subfolders?
I'm saying we have lots of options:
IMAP folder on Local nmh
host mail.foo.com folder
- -
work/
Hi,
> 9) Subfolders!: IMAP supports subfolders. Should we? What would the
> notation and data representation be? Any backward-compatibility
> problems? Speaking of which, how would local caches be stored? In a
> folder called "IMAP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Yuck. Auxiliary files to keep
> track of ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
