On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:51:05 +0100, asjo at koldfront.dk (Adam
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson wrote:
>
> > There must be a way to tell emacs message-mode to save a copy of
> > outgoing mail locally. Mutt does this with it's Fcc commands (ie.
> >
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hi, folks. I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to save local copies of
> sent mail. I really don't think that we need to require that the mail
> actually get
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:27:04 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza
wrote:
>> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
>> config file.
>
> Yes, we definitely need that.
>
>> Actually, while we're at it, we can consider making this
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:27:04 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza
wrote:
>> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
>> config file.
>
> Yes, we definitely need that.
>
>> Actually, while we're at it, we can consider making this
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:39:01 +0100, Adrien BUSTANY wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:27:04 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> >
> > I think we want a new C file to make it easy to ask for options out of
> > the configuration file.
>
> What about adding a way to get/set config variables from the notmuch
>
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:39:01 +0100, Adrien BUSTANY
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:27:04 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> >
> > I think we want a new C file to make it easy to ask for options out of
> > the configuration file.
>
> What about adding a way to get/set config variables from the notmuch
>
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:08:22 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> 2. of course, filenames need to be unique. Do we want/have to follow
> the maildir file naming conventions listed at
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
> or is it enough to use the Emacs lisp make-temp-file?
I'd very much prefer a real M
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 08:57:40PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> > in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to save local copies of
>
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
> config file.
Yes, we definitely need that.
> Actually, while we're at it, we can consider making this
> more flexible and adding a new option to the config file (e.g.
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
> config file.
Yes, we definitely need that.
> Actually, while we're at it, we can consider making this
> more flexible and adding a new option to the config file (e.g.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 08:57:40PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins
> wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> > in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to save local copies of
> > sent mail. I
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:08:22 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> 2. of course, filenames need to be unique. Do we want/have to follow
> the maildir file naming conventions listed at
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
> or is it enough to use the Emacs lisp make-temp-file?
I'd very much prefer a real M
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:51:05 +0100, a...@koldfront.dk (Adam
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson wrote:
>
> > There must be a way to tell emacs message-mode to save a copy of
> > outgoing mail locally. Mutt does this with it's Fcc commands (ie.
> > "fi
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Hi, folks. I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to save local copies of
> sent mail. I really don't think that we need to require that the mail
> actually get
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson wrote:
> There must be a way to tell emacs message-mode to save a copy of
> outgoing mail locally. Mutt does this with it's Fcc commands (ie.
> "file carbon copy"). I think we should look for a solution like this.
Gnus uses Gcc for this (see gnus-messa
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:02:18 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> We actually want to let the user *select* an email address from the
> config file, and then automagically set the bcc: flag as
> appropriate. Without that, I'd end up bcc'ing all of my mail through my
> home address, which would end up sen
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:50:17 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:37:12 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> > So we need to figure out how to configure (or hook) that
> > to insert the Bcc, and then we can fix notmuch.el to do this without any
> > user configuration.
>
> Just call:
>
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Marten Veldthuis wrote:
> There's a message-send-hook, which we should probably use. Something
> like:
>
> (add-hook 'message-send-hook 'notmuch-always-bcc-sender)
> (defun notmuch-always-bcc-sender ()
> (message-add-header (concat "Bcc: "
>
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:55:16 -0800, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:41:14 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> > Bcc-ing myself on every sent message is suboptimal for a number of
> > reasons: (1) gmail throws away the bcc-ed copy since it has the same
> > message id as the one sitting in the gm
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson wrote:
> There must be a way to tell emacs message-mode to save a copy of
> outgoing mail locally. Mutt does this with it's Fcc commands (ie.
> "file carbon copy"). I think we should look for a solution like this.
Gnus uses Gcc for this (see gnus-messa
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Marten Veldthuis wrote:
> There's a message-send-hook, which we should probably use. Something
> like:
>
> (add-hook 'message-send-hook 'notmuch-always-bcc-sender)
> (defun notmuch-always-bcc-sender ()
> (message-add-header (concat "Bcc: "
>
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:02:18 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> We actually want to let the user *select* an email address from the
> config file, and then automagically set the bcc: flag as
> appropriate. Without that, I'd end up bcc'ing all of my mail through my
> home address, which would end up sen
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> Good. So we can put this in notmuch.el and Keith will get everybody's
> sent mail. :)
That seems sub-optimal, at least for me...
> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
> config file.
We actually want to
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:29:15 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> Good. So we can put this in notmuch.el and Keith will get everybody's
> sent mail. :)
That seems sub-optimal, at least for me...
> It looks like we need a way to get the primary email address from the
> config file.
We actually want to
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:50:17 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:37:12 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> > So we need to figure out how to configure (or hook) that
> > to insert the Bcc, and then we can fix notmuch.el to do this without any
> > user configuration.
>
> Just call:
>
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:37:12 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> So we need to figure out how to configure (or hook) that
> to insert the Bcc, and then we can fix notmuch.el to do this without any
> user configuration.
Just call:
(message-mail nil nil '(("bcc" "kei...@keithp.com")))
instead of (message
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:37:12 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> So we need to figure out how to configure (or hook) that
> to insert the Bcc, and then we can fix notmuch.el to do this without any
> user configuration.
Just call:
(message-mail nil nil '(("bcc" "keithp at keithp.com")))
instead of (mess
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:24:52 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> However, if I'm using notmuch in emacs and press 'm' to compose a new
> message, then the Bcc header is not added automatically and I guess it's
> not surprising that the rest doesn't work as expected.
Yeah, sorry about that. That's a known
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:24:52 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> However, if I'm using notmuch in emacs and press 'm' to compose a new
> message, then the Bcc header is not added automatically and I guess it's
> not surprising that the rest doesn't work as expected.
Yeah, sorry about that. That's a known
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:55:16 -0800, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:41:14 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> > Bcc-ing myself on every sent message is suboptimal for a number of
> > reasons: (1) gmail throws away the bcc-ed copy since it has the same
> > message id as the one sitting in the gm
Hello,
Many thanks to Marten and Carl for the advice on using scripts for
assigning tags automatically. It works like a charm.
The next hurdle seems to be dealing with sent mail. I would like each
message that I send to be saved in my local mail folder and treated the
same as all my other mess
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:41:14 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> Bcc-ing myself on every sent message is suboptimal for a number of
> reasons: (1) gmail throws away the bcc-ed copy since it has the same
> message id as the one sitting in the gmail sent mail, and so the
> bcc-ed copy never makes it back to
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:41:14 +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> Bcc-ing myself on every sent message is suboptimal for a number of
> reasons: (1) gmail throws away the bcc-ed copy since it has the same
> message id as the one sitting in the gmail sent mail, and so the
> bcc-ed copy never makes it back to
Hello,
Many thanks to Marten and Carl for the advice on using scripts for
assigning tags automatically. It works like a charm.
The next hurdle seems to be dealing with sent mail. I would like each
message that I send to be saved in my local mail folder and treated the
same as all my other mess
34 matches
Mail list logo