with the following code:
\definefontfeature
[default]
[script=latn,liga=yes,kern=yes,tlig=yes,trep=yes]
\definefontsynonym [Garamond-Roman] [AGaramondPro-Regular] [features=default]
I have switched to XeTeX for now (\font\a='Adobe Garamond Pro' at
15pt\a works OK), but that's not the solution.
MtxRun
wrong, but I don't get the fi
ligature with the following code:
\definefontfeature
[default]
[script=latn,liga=yes,kern=yes,tlig=yes,trep=yes]
\definefontsynonym [Garamond-Roman] [AGaramondPro-Regular] [features=default]
I have switched to XeTeX for now (\font\a='Adobe Garamond Pro
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\definefontfeature
[default]
[script=latn,liga=yes,kern=yes,tlig=yes,trep=yes]
\definefontsynonym [Garamond-Roman] [AGaramondPro-Regular] [features=default]
I have switched to XeTeX for now (\font\a='Adobe Garamond
2008/10/6 Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Diego Depaoli wrote:
2008/10/3 Hans Hagen:
is ok, use btex color[white]{COPYRIGHT} etex instead
Please see attached output...
I missed such command?
\color[gray] of course
\color[redembarrass]{Me Stupid}
works too
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\definefontfeature
[default]
[script=latn,liga=yes,kern=yes,tlig=yes,trep=yes]
\definefontsynonym [Garamond-Roman] [AGaramondPro-Regular]
[features=default]
I have switched to XeTeX for now
2008/10/3 Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Diego Depaoli wrote:
Hi all,
from metafun manual, page 157, I took this example
\startuniqueMPgraphic{copyright}
picture p ; p := btex COPYRIGHT etex rotated 90 ;
setbounds p to boundingbox p enlarged 1pt ;
draw p withcolor .8white ;
2008/10/4 Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the case of XeTeX: no, it's not normal. If you add
\loadmapfile[lm-ec.map] this solves the problem, but if I was on your
place, I would use \sometxt{COPYRIGHT} instead of btex COPYRIGHT etex.
\sometxt works nice.
Many thanks.
--
Diego Depaoli
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Diego Depaoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/3 Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Diego Depaoli wrote:
Hi all,
from metafun manual, page 157, I took this example
\startuniqueMPgraphic{copyright}
picture p ; p := btex COPYRIGHT etex rotated 90 ;
, just define a color on the spot ..
{\definecolor[temp][specs]\color[temp]text}
In the case of XeTeX: no, it's not normal. If you add
\loadmapfile[lm-ec.map] this solves the problem, but if I was on your
place, I would use \sometxt{COPYRIGHT} instead of btex COPYRIGHT etex.
indeed (althouh
and goals. 90% of TeX
should work well (excepting experimental bits like luatex, xetex, and ConTeXt
MKiV which may need some tweaks) on all current platforms, but if you are
constrained by site policy to use binary packages provided by your
distribution,
that is an entirely different problem from
Hi all,
from metafun manual, page 157, I took this example
\startuniqueMPgraphic{copyright}
picture p ; p := btex COPYRIGHT etex rotated 90 ;
setbounds p to boundingbox p enlarged 1pt ;
draw p withcolor .8white ;
xyscale_currentpicture(\the\leftmarginwidth,\the\textheight) ;
\stopuniqueMPgraphic
Diego Depaoli wrote:
Hi all,
from metafun manual, page 157, I took this example
\startuniqueMPgraphic{copyright}
picture p ; p := btex COPYRIGHT etex rotated 90 ;
setbounds p to boundingbox p enlarged 1pt ;
draw p withcolor .8white ;
it ugly.)
In the case of XeTeX: no, it's not normal. If you add
\loadmapfile[lm-ec.map] this solves the problem, but if I was on your
place, I would use \sometxt{COPYRIGHT} instead of btex COPYRIGHT etex.
Loading map files has been removed from XeTeX a while ago. Maybe lm-ec
should be added back
)?
\startregister[index][umlautae]{...}
...
\stopregister[index][umlautae]
You could use umlauts in macro names only with XeTeX and LuaTeX
but not with pdfTeX.
strange...
sure, you are right: no umlaut in macro names.
only, I didn't consider it as a macro name, for it is written in the
text (ie
]{...}
...
\stopregister[index][umlautae]
You could use umlauts in macro names only with XeTeX and LuaTeX
but not with pdfTeX.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist
Hi,
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Flavien Lambert wrote:
In fact, I have just checked that this options are not necessary. I forgot
to say that I was using XeTeX. It seems that, even with these options,
accented letters are not printed properly in the properties
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Flavien Lambert wrote:
In fact, I have just checked that this options are not necessary. I forgot
to say that I was using XeTeX. It seems that, even with these options,
accented letters are not printed properly in the properties of the document
Yue Wang wrote:
The problem is that that's only a dirty trick that is not supposed to
work and might stop working in the future, so I would rather try not
to rely on it. A better interface for XeTeX typescripts (something
similar to fontspec) is missing heavily.
I prefer use opentype
In fact, I have just checked that this options are not necessary. I forgot
to say that I was using XeTeX. It seems that, even with these options,
accented letters are not printed properly in the properties of the document.
There is no problems with standard ConTeXt (MKII).
2008/9/19 Braslau
Mohamed Bana wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Mohamed Bana wrote:
Hi guys,
Why doesn't this definition use the old style numerals that come with the
font?
It seems to use the latin modern font when I try to use \os. Small caps
are
working fine.
\os is
The problem is that that's only a dirty trick that is not supposed to
work and might stop working in the future, so I would rather try not
to rely on it. A better interface for XeTeX typescripts (something
similar to fontspec) is missing heavily.
I prefer use opentype features than add
do I achieve the latter? As in break out of
onum and typeset in the normal numbers?
I'm using TeXlive 2008 on vista, the pdf reports that I'm using XeTeX version;
2008.05.21 15:21.
\definetypeface[myface][rm][Xserif][Minion Pro]
% i've also tried
%\definetypeface[myface][rm][Xserif][Warnock Pro
that is not supposed to
work and might stop working in the future, so I would rather try not
to rely on it. A better interface for XeTeX typescripts (something
similar to fontspec) is missing heavily.
Concerning your first problem: I have tried patching Xsans definitions
) will have exceptions and then
we end up with n! possible combinations
not n!, but 2^n.
last question: is it possible to add fontconfig-like interface? if I
define to use minion famaily, then all the alternatives are
automatically defined like xetex?
Yue Wang
combinations
not n!, but 2^n.
last question: is it possible to add fontconfig-like interface? if I
define to use minion famaily, then all the alternatives are
automatically defined like xetex?
Hans need fonts to test this but I could provide you a typescript
based solution,
it's not so elegant
Yue Wang wrote:
last question: is it possible to add fontconfig-like interface? if I
define to use minion famaily, then all the alternatives are
automatically defined like xetex?
i never looked into that interface so i cannot comment on it, but i've
learned my lessons with fonts
I've also been wondering why LuaTeX is considerably slower than XeTeX. Has
anyone been doing any research into LuaJIT?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki
Mohamed Bana wrote:
I've also been wondering why LuaTeX is considerably slower than XeTeX. Has
anyone been doing any research into LuaJIT?
(1) luajit is non portable (not on all architectures) so for the moment
it's no option
(2) luatex will always be slower, because we do many things
extensively these days, and there's a lot of metapost graphics
involved. mkiv is amazingly fast, while both mkii and xetex take very
long to compile my test files (and clutter the directory with all the
intermediate files). Font loading tends to be long at first run and
quite efficient
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
module. One of the metapost graphics for picture inclusion seems to
give problems when run under XeTeX, so I was wondering if I could
replace it with the clever sometxt mechanism Mojca mentions in her
MyWay. But then I saw
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Mojca, Aditya,
thanks for your responses. I was aware that you can use textext
(that's what I do right now), but was under the impression that
sometxt was the way to go (faster and more flexible). Now I'm
confused :-)
In mkii (XeTeX
/
minimals/current/bin/metapost/linux/ minimals/current/bin/xetex/linux/
minimals/current/bin/man/ minimals/current/bin/common/linux/
minimals/current/bin/context/linux/
minimals/current/bin/metapost/linux/
minimals/current/bin/luatex/linux/ minimals/current/bin/man/
minimals/current/bin/common/linux
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Someone needs to write Unicode math support for mkii, or you need to
make your own virtual font.
Well...someone also needs to write Unicode math support for mkiv and I
would work on that in the hope that there is some chance
Just to understand a bit more : signs like equal are printed inside math
environment with GFS Didot thanks to \definetypeface[myface][rm][Xserif][GFS
Didot]. Since GFS Didot ,as a greek font has greek letters, why are these
glyphs not used ? I suppose that when greek people are using directly
Flavien Lambert wrote:
Just to understand a bit more : signs like equal are printed inside math
environment with GFS Didot thanks to \definetypeface[myface][rm][Xserif][GFS
Didot]. Since GFS Didot ,as a greek font has greek letters, why are these
glyphs not used ? I suppose that when greek
to a predefined
commando (e.g. framed) which can be handy sometimes
module. One of the metapost graphics for picture inclusion seems to
give problems when run under XeTeX, so I was wondering if I could
replace it with the clever sometxt mechanism Mojca mentions in her
MyWay. But then I saw
the impression that
sometxt was the way to go (faster and more flexible). Now I'm
confused :-) I was asking because I was working on my presentation
module. One of the metapost graphics for picture inclusion seems to
give problems when run under XeTeX, so I was wondering if I could
On Sep 8, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
indeed; this is a side effect of xetex being opentype and mp only able
to deal with 8 bit fonts; in mkiv mp never sees any text (not een the
btex .. etex which is replaced by by textext before the mp code is
passed to mp); that's why in mkiv
questions after reading it:
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/Type1fonts/fontinstallationguide/
(I have an impression that some appedix of LaTeX companion was freely
available on web, covering the same topic, but I'm probably wrong.)
Mojca
PS: my advice: use LuaTeX or XeTeX and type
btw, I think Windows users are not command line experts. I think the
minimal installer can add more options.
for example, which distribution to choose (MKIV or XeTeX or pdfTeX),
which fonts to be download (TeXGyre, Kurier, Iwona...) according to
the distribution (in MKIV and XeTeX, download otf
Dear all, I try to use Open Type fonts with ConTeXt and XeTeX (I recently
did the same with LaTeX using fontspec and mathspec packages). From the web
site, I managed to use them for standard text as well as roman alphabet in
math. Unfortunately, greek letters stay printed with the Latin Modern
(Sorry for the preceding message, I forgot the [NTG-context] for filters...)
Dear all, I try to use Open Type fonts with ConTeXt and XeTeX (I recently
did the same with LaTeX using fontspec and mathspec packages). From the web
site, I managed to use them for standard text as well as roman
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Yue Wang wrote:
btw, I think Windows users are not command line experts. I think the
minimal installer can add more options.
for example, which distribution to choose (MKIV or XeTeX or pdfTeX),
Isn't that available already? (No windows to test.)
which fonts
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Flavien Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Sorry for the preceding message, I forgot the [NTG-context] for filters...)
Dear all, I try to use Open Type fonts with ConTeXt and XeTeX (I recently
did the same with LaTeX using fontspec and mathspec packages). From
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Someone needs to write Unicode math support for mkii, or you need to
make your own virtual font.
Well...someone also needs to write Unicode math support for mkiv and I
would work on that in the hope that there is some chance that I may
actually
support for SyncTeX. SyncTeX is new synchronization technology by
Jerome Laurens which is included in TeX Live 2008 (but not earlier TeX
distributions). The technology is built directly into pdfTeX and XeTeX. In
modern TeX distributions, most typesetting actually calls pdfetex (even if
using latex
Hi all,
compiling this small file with luatex I get weird results.
All works fine with xetex.
\mainlanguage[it]
\setupcolors[state=start]
\setupinteraction[state=start, color=darkblue]
\useURL[54/92][http://arianna.consiglioregionale.piemonte.it/base/leggi/l1992054.html][][Legge
regionale 09
line 59 a new line 60 with the following content:
cont-de xetex cont-usr.tex-8bit *cont-de.in
this is a way texexec works. but for mkiv and context there is still no way
how to get it working but I keep on trying
pdftex cont-usr.tex-8bit *cont-de.ini
and add directly after line 59 a new line 60 with the following content:
cont-de xetex cont-usr.tex-8bit *cont-de.in
this is a way texexec works. but for mkiv and context there is still no way
how to get it working but I keep
). The technology is built directly into pdfTeX and XeTeX. In
modern TeX distributions, most typesetting actually calls pdfetex (even if
using latex to output a dvi file), and thus the technology is available for
such typesetting. To use the technology, add the flag --synctex=1
Any advice on how to do
. SyncTeX is new synchronization
technology by
Jerome Laurens which is included in TeX Live 2008 (but not earlier
TeX
distributions). The technology is built directly into pdfTeX and
XeTeX. In
modern TeX distributions, most typesetting actually calls pdfetex
(even if
using latex to output a dvi
on
a web page.
Cleaninng up my mailbox (so I'm not sure if you still need the answer) ...
Are you using pdfTeX or LuaTeX/XeTeX? In pdfTeX you need to switch the
font (or at least change the encoding to texnansi)
\usetypescript[modern][texnansi]
\setupbodyfont[modern,10pt]
\starttext
\dorecurse{5
TeXExec | tex engine: xetex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
This is XeTeXk, Version 3.141592-2.2-0.996 (Web2C 7.5.6)
%-line parsing enabled.
entering extended mode
(./hello.tex
ConTeXt ver: 2007.01.12 15:56 MKII fmt: 2007.5.18 int: english/
english
seems odd. I do not use XeTeX but I am guessing
is new synchronization technology
by Jerome Laurens which is included in TeX Live 2008 (but not earlier
TeX distributions). The technology is built directly into pdfTeX and
XeTeX. In modern TeX distributions, most typesetting actually calls
pdfetex (even if using latex to output a dvi file
(but not earlier
TeX distributions). The technology is built directly into pdfTeX and
XeTeX. In modern TeX distributions, most typesetting actually calls
pdfetex (even if using latex to output a dvi file), and thus the
technology is available for such typesetting. To use the technology,
add the flag
by Jerome Laurens which is included in TeX Live 2008 (but not earlier
TeX distributions). The technology is built directly into pdfTeX and
XeTeX. In modern TeX distributions, most typesetting actually calls
pdfetex (even if using latex to output a dvi file), and thus the
technology
mohbana from the IRC directed me to the mailing-list, he already told
me to rehash and do
luatools --generate
texmfstart texexec --make --all --luatex en
texmfstart texexec --make --all --pdftex en
texmfstart texexec --make --all --xetex en
but nothing helped.
I would be glad if you could help me
)?
It is default for XeTeX and LuaTeX.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage
On Aug 28, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hans, thanks a lot for your reply. Amazing - the lua code is so simple
that even I can understand it! I'm certain to use it later; for the
time being, I want to remain compatible for mkii and XeTeX as well.
\startluacode
document.mymodule
On Aug 20, 2008, at 8:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schmitz at uni-bonn.de writes:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the Adobe ArnoPro font (just testing if it will
work
with
ConTeXt). The font does work with ConTeXt/XeTeX, but not in mkiv.
When I
try to compile
Thank you Khaled.
As you said we don't need \textdir in Xetex and I can use \pardir TRT
in this situation. I thought that maybe there is a simple setup for
sectioning number in context that I am not aware of. Any way, I have
translated The not so short introduction to latex to farsi and also
I am
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 05:49:31PM +0330, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I want to use context+xetex for right-to-left typesetting and need to
know if it is possible to use the command \pagedir TRT in this
situation. (I tested that apparently only \pardir TRT is active).
If the answer
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:31:38AM +0300, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 05:49:31PM +0330, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I want to use context+xetex for right-to-left typesetting and need to
know if it is possible to use the command \pagedir TRT in this
situation. (I
Hi everyone,
I want to use context+xetex for right-to-left typesetting and need to
know if it is possible to use the command \pagedir TRT in this
situation. (I tested that apparently only \pardir TRT is active).
If the answer of the above question is negative I would like to know
how can I change
Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schmitz at uni-bonn.de writes:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the Adobe ArnoPro font (just testing if it will work
with
ConTeXt). The font does work with ConTeXt/XeTeX, but not in mkiv. When I
try to compile my test file with mkiv, I get this error message (which
Alan Bowen wrote:
Thanks, Taco.
After installing ConTeXt 2008-08-04, I have cont-en.fmt in
texmf-var/web2c/pdftex
and
texmf-var/web2c/xetex
Installing ConTeXt 2008-08-15 has the same files in the same places,
though I gather that it replaces cont-en.fmt in
texmf-var/web2c/pdftex
Thanks, Taco.
After installing ConTeXt 2008-08-04, I have cont-en.fmt in
texmf-var/web2c/pdftex
and
texmf-var/web2c/xetex
Installing ConTeXt 2008-08-15 has the same files in the same places,
though I gather that it replaces cont-en.fmt in
texmf-var/web2c/pdftex
with as
TeXExec | tex: 14/08
to me, you should really send a precise example.
See test-lua2.tex + pdf
b) I also tried MnSymbol5.otf and there I get an error invalid
character. (I tried to get an A). With xetex the font works fine.
I can't confirm that. I get the A all right (see attachment). Again,
please send
tried to get an A). With xetex the font works fine.
I can't confirm that. I get the A all right (see attachment). Again,
please send the precise example that fails.
The MnSymbol-Bold5 you used works fine for me too. MnSymbol5 is the font
doesn't work (the code is -- commented -- in test-lua2
/web2c/pdftex/cont-en.fmt
/home/mohamed/.texlive2007/texmf-var/web2c/pdftex/cont-en.fmt
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex/cont-en.fmt
Typesetting the bare minimal file works, but lua or xetex doesn't;
$ texexec --lua test.tex
TeXExec | processing document 'test.tex'
TeXExec | no ctx file found
TeXExec
that leds to an extended
\font command (or a \font command with extended syntax similar to xetex)
with opentype/ttf-support. If such a primitive were present it would be
probably quite easy to write the LaTeX support e.g. by adapting
fontspec. Or a bundle which can be used to convert other input encodings
On Aug 14, 2008, at 12:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typesetting the bare minimal file works, but lua or xetex doesn't;
You need to make the formats for these as well:
texexec --make --all --xtx
(and run texhash again after creating the formats; when you think
about it, it'll make sense
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 14, 2008, at 12:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typesetting the bare minimal file works, but lua or xetex doesn't;
You need to make the formats for these as well:
texexec --make --all --xtx
(and run
Ulrike Fischer wrote:
But what would be really fine were extracts of the context code: E.g. a
bundle of self contained lua-code and tex-code that leds to an extended
\font command (or a \font command with extended syntax similar to xetex)
with opentype/ttf-support. If such a primitive were
an A). With xetex the font works fine.
I would be quite grateful if someone could tell me how to solve this
problems.
--
Ulrike Fischer
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki
--reload run. But this won't work for
incremental updates, since you can't tell whether you should drop an
old hash entry or not. So if you want to use hashing, you really need
a naming scheme that avoids creating conflicts.
XeTeX solves this problem by using *only* the ID 16 and ID 17 OpenType
the latest beta (this afternoon version?)
XeTeX solves this problem by using *only* the ID 16 and ID 17 OpenType
values to create a unique name for system fonts. I actually filed a
bug about lack of support for the common ID 1/2 names, but Johnathan
WONTFIXED it because he really wants the font names
MnSymbol5.otf and there I get an error invalid
character. (I tried to get an A). With xetex the font works fine.
I can't confirm that. I get the A all right (see attachment). Again,
please send the precise example that fails.
Arthur
ulrike.tex
Description: TeX document
ulrike.pdf
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no point doing anything about context in texlive right now,
it is way too dangerous. we have working mkii on texlive and even
a (mostly) working xetex, I don't want to endanger that just so that
the mkiv
Hi
What do you mean (mostly) working xetex? It's just been updated to
0.999.6. Work pretty well for me...
old xetex is known to work very will with the old version of context on ctan.
so the new xetex is just a (mostly) working xetex. It might/might no
have some problem when running context
Hi,
the background for the cells in flow charts are moved to the left
when you use transparent colors in a document and XeTeX as engine.
\usemodule[chart]
\setupcolors[state=start]
\definecolor[tred][r=1,t=0.5,a=1]
\setuphead[section][color=tred]
\starttext
\section{Section
with the cache/hash? Bold is a prefix of Bold Italic...
FYI: XeTeX had a somewhat similar problem in 0.999.4; it got fixed in 0.999.5.
- Typesetting with any specified font fails
In plain TeX this is expected. You are not running context at all.
I know; I was taking it one step at a time. I assume
context in texlive right now,
it is way too dangerous. we have working mkii on texlive and even
a (mostly) working xetex, I don't want to endanger that just so that
the mkiv (with its old luatex.exe) will work a little better.
Once texlive 2008 is out for a while, we can think about updating
defines font in a more low-level way. It's really only a
workaround and should probably disappear altogether; I haven't seen
any of these errors in the past. It is also fairly agnostic concerning
the engine (mkii or XeTeX or mkiv, though not all fonts will work with
all versions) while t
manual did currently not work with MkIV because it
contains
a few old and in MkIV not define command.
To create a pdf call 'texexec ma-cb-fa' for the print version and
'texexec --mode=screen ma-cb-fa' for the screen version.
You could try to use XeTeX in your case.
To the other translators: Do you
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Jesse Alama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mojca Miklavec writes:
As far as I can tell this is only a complaint, in the sense that the
XeTeX run finishes and produces a PDF. Is that what you mean?
Yes. Though this should be fixed now anyway.
Mojca
Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Jesse Alama wrote:
\definetypeface [busted] [rm] [serif] [palatino] [default]
\setupbodyfont [busted]
\starttext
\input tufte
\stoptext
Using XeTeX and ConTeXt MkII with the TeX Live 2008 developer snapshot
application:
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/development_tools/svnx.html
I have used it to checkout the latest versions of LuaTeX and XeTeX: it
works fine and is quite user friendly.
Best regards: OK
___
If your
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Jesse Alama wrote:
\definetypeface [busted] [rm] [serif] [palatino] [default]
\setupbodyfont [busted]
\starttext
\input tufte
\stoptext
Using XeTeX and ConTeXt MkII with the TeX Live 2008 developer snapshot
(as of a few days ago), I run into a bunch
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I suspect what the error could be (harmless, though it makes sense to
fix it), but I only think that error reporting got more verbose since
it works here despite many warnings. Outside of TL (probably some
branch of xetex trunk + latest context) I don't get that warning
Taco:
... does it actually work, and can you explain why?
I don't get the error any more with that fix (and it's not an error anyway).
The problem is that if there is no file: prefix in font synonyms,
then ConTeXt asks for
\font\whatever=texgyre-whatever:options
and XeTeX first asks
:24 PM, Jesse Alama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using XeTeX and ConTeXt MkII with the TeX Live 2008 developer snapshot
(as of a few days ago), I run into a bunch of invalid fontname errors
when compiling some documents:
$ texmfstart texexec --xtx file.tex
TeXExec | processing document 'file.tex
will be of the size of a book; so would an exhaustive manual on
metapost/mp-lib (think of an updated metafun manual). I can also imagine
an exhaustive manual for fonts to be big (how do we handle fonts for
lua/xetex/pdftex; how do we handle fonts for different scripts, etc.); and
fairly large manuals for floats
manual, it will be *huge*. An exhaustive
manual
on math will be of the size of a book; so would an exhaustive manual
on
metapost/mp-lib (think of an updated metafun manual). I can also
imagine
an exhaustive manual for fonts to be big (how do we handle fonts for
lua/xetex/pdftex; how do we
in xetex).
As you know, the Mapping=farsidigits in a font definition works
perfect in xelatex.
I would say that ConTeXt lacks a nice interface for that at the
moment. There is tlig/trep feature that works that way (remaps ' to
rightquote for example), but it's spread all over the place and might
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to pass a character to another in MKIV, I mean, like
XeTeX in which one can pass one unicode character to another one (this
is done in some mapping files with some lines in it of the form
U+0030 U+06F0
Dear Mehdi,
سلام
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:48:46 -0600, Mehdi Omidali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to pass a character to another in MKIV, I mean, like
XeTeX in which one can pass one unicode character to another one (this
is done in some mapping files with some lines
. In
XeTeX one of the font features is to assign the value of E8C8 to
002E. Then the engine automatically prints 002E whenever it has to
print E8C8 (except in math mode for which there is a \XeTeXmathcode
command).
Best wishes
On 7/22/08, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear
not satisfied with this
character and like the separator character to be a period 002E. In
XeTeX one of the font features is to assign the value of E8C8 to
002E. Then the engine automatically prints 002E whenever it has to
print E8C8 (except in math mode for which there is a \XeTeXmathcode
command
=persiannumerals]
and the engine puts persiandecimalseparator character E8C8 between
chapter numbers and section numbers. I am not satisfied with this
character and like the separator character to be a period 002E. In
XeTeX one of the font features is to assign the value of E8C8 to
002E. Then the engine
1001 - 1100 of 2328 matches
Mail list logo
