Dear list,
I want to have columns of different widths in my document. Therefore I'm using
the newcolumnsets (aka pagegrids). However, it seems as if my settings are only
applied on right pages. Why is that? I tried adding page=left and page=right
but that doesn't do anything. MWE is below.
C
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2018-04-13 um 13:42 schrieb Henri Menke :
Exactly. We have that. And most bits and pieces are in place to allow
that, except for the problem with mtxrun not being able to determine
the platform correctly.
Actually, the musl detection only ha
Am 2018-04-13 um 13:42 schrieb Henri Menke :
>> Exactly. We have that. And most bits and pieces are in place to allow
>> that, except for the problem with mtxrun not being able to determine
>> the platform correctly.
>
> Actually, the musl detection only has to be peformed for downloading
> binar
That solved it. For reference, I previously used the Texlive versions
bundled with Cygwin and Arch Linux.
/MJO
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4/13/2018 3:38 PM, Magnus J wrote:
>>
>> This is even more weird (same setup as before)
>
> i uploaded a beta .. maybe that one w
On 4/13/2018 3:38 PM, Magnus J wrote:
This is even more weird (same setup as before)
i uploaded a beta .. maybe that one works better (at least we run the
same then)
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA
This is even more weird (same setup as before)
\starttext
wedge\wedge\footnote{wedge} prime\prime\footnote{prime} % <-- no
\wedge (question mark) in footnote, but \prime
\page
wedge\wedge\footnote{wedge} prime\prime\footnote{prime} % <--
\wedge and \prime
\page
wedge
On 4/13/2018 1:14 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote:
3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to
a. the setup rsync bin/ directories
b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64)
we don't use texluac, don't need texlua on windo
Well that's even more odd. Is it visible in the attachment? Tested
with updated Acrobat Reader and Sumatra pdf viewer without any visible
\prime or \doubleprime, except in the footnote (where there is no
\wedge on the other hand)... Note that \prime is visible as a footnote
symbol, which is also in
On 04/13/2018 11:14 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> 3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to
>>>a. the setup rsync bin/ directories
>>>b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64)
>>
>> we don't use texluac, don't n
On 11 April 2018 at 22:37, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4/11/2018 10:08 PM, Brian Hunt wrote:
>
>> 3. Add texlua (and texluac?) to
>>a. the setup rsync bin/ directories
>>b. the tex/texmf-linuxmusl(|-ppc|-64)
>
> we don't use texluac, don't need texlua on windows and on linux texlua is
> just a s
On 4/13/2018 12:34 PM, Magnus J wrote:
$D\prime = 0.98$ % <-- no \prime in output
$D\doubleprime = 0.98$% <-- no \doubleprime in output
hm, i see primes here
-
Han
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:45:39 +0100, Lawrence Bell
wrote:
> On 13/04/18 07:31, Henri Menke wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 08:13 +0200, Christoph Reller wrote:
>>>
>>> Please, Hans, I kindly ask you to reconsider. I am aware of your
>>> opinion and reasoning about this issue. But I believe that
Fri, 13 Apr 2018 11:48:28 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4/13/2018 8:13 AM, Christoph Reller wrote:
>>
>> This is a long standing feature request reported multiple times by
>> myself and others with MWEs in
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context@ntg.nl/msg79620.html and
>> https://www.mail-arc
For those interested in reproducing the issues experienced on Alpine, I've
published an image that you should be able to start with:
$ docker run -ti brianmhunt/context-alpine:demo
(You can see the Dockerfile etc here:
https://hub.docker.com/r/brianmhunt/context-alpine/)
That image applies the T
Thanks, I could have sworn I had tested that. With my new setup, I
still have trouble with some characters in math mode. Specifically, I
don't see the \prime and \doubleprime characters in math mode, and I
can't use \wedge as a footnote symbol.
Consider this commented example, pdf result attached.
Dear Michelle,
On 13 April 2018 at 11:13, Rodzis, Michelle wrote:
> Dear Mojca,
>
> obviously I have forgotten to add an important detail - the fonts I want to
> install are TrueType fonts. My bad and apologies!
>
> For installing ttf I've used
> http://tug.org/pracjourn/2005-2/schmitz/schmitz.pdf
On 4/13/2018 8:13 AM, Christoph Reller wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:27:15 +0100, Lawrence Bell
wrote:
Thanks very much for your replies. It's reassuring to see (it seems)
that I've not overlooked some extra option that magically does the job
:) Worst case scenario I'll hack something together
Dear Christoph,
I take it from your reply that fixing this problem with interactivity
would likely cause some trouble with the printability? And therefore,
it's staying as it is to prioritize printability? That's understandable,
but a bit frustrating, since I still don't have any clue what the act
On 4/13/2018 11:10 AM, MF wrote:
After setting ConTeXt root everything works fine and as expected.
However, the texfont tool seems to be missing which means I cannot
install new fonts in my container. This seems kind of odd to me since
I thought texfont is available automatically after ConTeXt
On 4/13/2018 11:03 AM, Rodzis, Michelle wrote:
No, I want to use MKIV.
then install with
first_setup.sh --engine=luatex
and you save space too
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Rodzis, Michelle <
rod...@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> No, I want to use MKIV
>
then texfont is not needed -- see Massimiliano's answer.
--
luigi
___
If your question is of inter
Dear Mojca,
obviously I have forgotten to add an important detail - the fonts I want to
install are TrueType fonts. My bad and apologies!
For installing ttf I've used
http://tug.org/pracjourn/2005-2/schmitz/schmitz.pdf (also mentioned in wiki) so
far, and it worked every time.
Best, Michell
> After setting ConTeXt root everything works fine and as expected.
> However, the texfont tool seems to be missing which means I cannot
> install new fonts in my container. This seems kind of odd to me since
> I thought texfont is available automatically after ConTeXt is
> installed.
>
> I also
No, I want to use MKIV.
Best, Michelle
Von: ntg-context im Auftrag von luigi scarso
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. April 2018 10:48:21
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Installing fonts in a ConTeXt Docker (texfont tool
missing?)
On Fri
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, luigi scarso
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Rodzis, Michelle <
> rod...@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>
>> Dear list,
>>
>>
>>
>> currently I work on a customized Docker container based on Ubuntu 16.04
>> where I run ConTeXt standalone. To install
On 13 April 2018 at 10:16, Rodzis, Michelle wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> currently I work on a customized Docker container based on Ubuntu 16.04
> where I run ConTeXt standalone. To install ConTeXt, I use the approach
> described in the wiki:
>
>
> RUN wget http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/first-
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Rodzis, Michelle <
rod...@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> Dear list,
>
>
>
> currently I work on a customized Docker container based on Ubuntu 16.04
> where I run ConTeXt standalone. To install ConTeXt, I use the approach
> described in the wiki:
>
>
> RUN wget ht
Dear list,
currently I work on a customized Docker container based on Ubuntu 16.04 where I
run ConTeXt standalone. To install ConTeXt, I use the approach described in the
wiki:
RUN wget http://minimals.contextgarden.net/setup/first-setup.sh &&\
sh ./first-setup.sh --modules=all
After se
28 matches
Mail list logo