Hello,
You can very easily download the beta/standalone installation that can very
happily coexist with TL release. All that is needed to choose the standalone
version is to modify your PATH appropriately (by sourcing the setuptex script).
In fact, we recommend even downloading an installation
Dear Henri,
the is taken from a mail to Hans and Luigi.
Better be patient and wait for Hans to implement the changes (shouldn't
break your documents). But I donno if the previously RNG based 'id' (a
fixed value now!) is handled somewhere else in the code. Hans knows, I
don't. There were several
Dear Peter,
thanks for the update. Can you maybe tell what exactly has changed to fix it?
I'm on the TL 2016 release and cannot update because I fear regressions for my
important document.
Cheers, Henri
On 10/18/2016 02:54 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just for the records. The problems w
Hi,
just for the records. The problems were on ConTeXt's side (fixed now),
the online validator does a pretty good job.
Peter
Am 14.10.2016 um 17:10 schrieb Peter Rolf:
> Am 14.10.2016 um 14:16 schrieb luigi scarso:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>>> Sigh.. I had high hop
Am 14.10.2016 um 14:16 schrieb luigi scarso:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>> Sigh.. I had high hopes on this one. Would be nice to have a free and
>> working (in this combination) validator. I'll make some tests over the
>> weekend and contact the author(s). No bug report,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> Sigh.. I had high hopes on this one. Would be nice to have a free and
> working (in this combination) validator. I'll make some tests over the
> weekend and contact the author(s). No bug report, no fix.
I have not said that it's wrong, only tha
Am 14.10.2016 um 11:22 schrieb luigi scarso:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
>> Meanwhile I stumpled over
>>
>> https://www.pdf-tools.com/pdf/validate-pdfa-online.aspx
>>
>> but haven't found the time (and mood!) to test it.
>>
>
> it fails for pdf/a-1a with the test.pdf made
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> Meanwhile I stumpled over
>
> https://www.pdf-tools.com/pdf/validate-pdfa-online.aspx
>
> but haven't found the time (and mood!) to test it.
>
it fails for pdf/a-1a with the test.pdf made by context
Validating file "test.pdf" for conformance le
Am 13.10.2016 um 16:23 schrieb luigi scarso:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
>> Dear Luigi,
>>
>> thanks for the link. I tried the validation with a little simplified
>> example, which I show below. VeraPDF reports some errors, see attached
>> `test-result.xml`. Unfortun
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
> Dear Luigi,
>
> thanks for the link. I tried the validation with a little simplified
> example, which I show below. VeraPDF reports some errors, see attached
> `test-result.xml`. Unfortunately, VeraPDF cannot handle my production
> docume
Dear Luigi,
thanks for the link. I tried the validation with a little simplified example,
which I show below. VeraPDF reports some errors, see attached
`test-result.xml`. Unfortunately, VeraPDF cannot handle my production document
and crashes during validation :( (see attached `production-re
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
> Dear list, (especially Luigi)
>
> for online publication I need to create a PDF/A compliant output file. Does
> anyone have any experience with it and can tell me whether my setup will
> work? So far I'm using
>
> \setupbackend
> [
>
Dear list, (especially Luigi)
for online publication I need to create a PDF/A compliant output file. Does
anyone have any experience with it and can tell me whether my setup will work?
So far I'm using
\setupbackend
[
format={pdf/a-2a},
profile={default_cmyk.icc,default_rgb.icc,defa
13 matches
Mail list logo