Interesting good to know.
In Australia, you deal with the end company (i.e. you will interview with the
recruiter, but then you'll interview with the company direct). The recruiter
isn't involved once your hired. Gives you plenty of opportunity to ask whatever
you need to the client direct.
And that it supports AD for permissions.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:56 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server
So it seems like more folks ar3 leaning to the
They may call it CIFS rather than NTSF
--
richard
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Link
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:18 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server
Do they have NTFS permissions
CIFS is the share from the storage (NAS/SAN) perspective. Once the server is
connected to the CIFS share, you then apply NTFS perms to it, just like you
would any folder/share.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West
My experience as well
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Ding, ding...
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:53 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Unless it’s a Buffalo Terrastation…. L (or at least the version I have
which is ~4 yrs old).
** **
*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Guyer,
I think what he is referring to in single point of failure is the
hardware. So for example if your ESXi host goes down, your Citrix
environment is down. Same thing for your Hyper-V host running exchange.
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Same here on the Buffalo... blah :(Don KFrom: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com To: "ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com"
ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server Ding, ding...On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:53 AM, David Lum
That was the basis of the original question, NAS or Server
NAS must haves, non-negotiable;
Redundant Power
2 NICS and or a slot to put a spare NIC
AD Support
RAID
X number of supported connections
MINIMUM 4 bays, prefer 8
-
Now in retrospect your typical server already has everything
I tried a QNAP NAS in my lab and even after getting ASB involved, we never
could get the thing working the way it was advertised to work. I replaced the
QNAP with a Synology and have been extremely pleased with the unit. ASB helped
me get all the switch config stuff working.
Write-up here:
That's really all the requirements,
The reason I personally like the server idea is because of the fact that I can
have a guest OS up an running almost immediately.y
Lets say my SQL , or Terminal server suffers hardware failure (motherboard as
someone pointed out) sure dell will overnight me
+1
With a small environment and limited cash, I would want to maximize resources
and options. The features and flexibility of Storage Server 2012 makes a
pretty strong argument.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj643303.aspx
We were told that 2012 R2 could act as an AD host - and we were told by the
same storage vendor that they expected to start shipping units in 3rd quarter
this year.
For speed you will get the latest SMB speeds with the 2012 server which will
help performance - some nas boxes seem to use
Just sucks when potential employers haven't done due diligence and have
signed an onerous contract that prevents this kind of dialogue...
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
This is sometimes true in the US as well. It really just depends on the
i.e. sometimes (oftentimes?) it isn't possible to have that direct dialogue.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Just sucks when potential employers haven't done due diligence and have
signed an onerous contract that prevents this kind of dialogue...
I still have one. The domain integration is annoying enough that I finally
abandoned it.
As for my much newer Synology, I cannot sing its praises enough...
*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information
I've used Synology support so far, and they got back to me same day both
times.
*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information Security) for
the SMB market…***
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jimmy Tran
Yes that is exactly why I was saying to get a new server, so that I will have
to 2 hosts
so that in the event of a physical failure i can jump to the other.
Now can someone suggest or recommend good iSCSI device?
Jean-Paul Natola
From: asbz...@gmail.com
Just a suggestion, I have been reading great things about Windows Server
2012 and using it as a ISCSI host. You get can an inexpensive server put
lots of storage in it and use it as a NAS/SAN on your network.
I am using it in a lab environment and it works great.
Just a thought.
On Thu, Jun
I've recently moved from a small (50 node) network to a 3500 node network.
In my last gig, I never had a single machine lose its trust relationship
and have to be rejoined to the domain in 14 years. In my new gig I get 2-3
of these a month. Is that normal? Anybody with a large domain never
I've seen this sort of thing in larger networks, but more like 1 or 2 a
quarter, at worst. 2-3 a month seems excessive, but some more details
would be helpful...
Windows versions, AD versions/levels, network configuration, etc
*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker*
Did somebody create images without properly sysprep'ing them. I am betting yes.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Songstad
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:27 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Trust relationships
Saw it a lot more in NT4/2000 days than in more recent times.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory Messaging Services
3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa 19073
email: dgu...@che.orgmailto:dgu...@che.org
Office: 610.550.3595 |
duplicate machine names, duplicate SIDs, DNS db problems, AD db problems ?
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Bill Songstad bsongs...@gmail.com wrote:
I've recently moved from a small (50 node) network to a 3500 node
network. In my last gig, I never had a single machine lose its trust
Paranoia, from watching very, very carefully...
Kurt
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
No.
Centralized storage is incredibly seductive. It's very easy to start putting
everything on it, and then all your eggs are in one basket. What happens to
Most of the common culprits are in place unfortunately. DNS problems, DHCP
issues, improper syspreps, replication failures a veritable smorgasboard of
problem causers.
The domain is W2K3 the clients are a mix of WXP and up including windows
server 2008r2. There are 15 DCs across various sites
Dunno, but that is how it happened here. Roughly the same number of machines as
you, just under 3K...tech's tried to do it the old cheater XP way. They were
imaged over the summer, we had 3 or 4 a month over the course of the next year.
Like you we never saw a bunch all at once. Before the
replication failures
Of AD? I would fix that first before I fix the sysprep issue.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Songstad
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:12 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Trust
28 matches
Mail list logo
