Re: Blackberry Server question.

The costs and complexities of running BES can be minimized if you use middleware to connect your Blackberry's directly to Exchange. The app I use is called NotifySync. Full PIM OTA, remote wipe etc. It just works. Can't live without the thong anymore. Instead of reading magz in the toilet I now rea

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

I have to agree, certainly the best money I have spent Probably ever! In theory I get unlimited "corrective" surgery too, but there is only so much they can laser out of your eye. The only downside id when the painkillers wear off in the middle of the night, and maybe the realisation of wha

Re: [OT][Humor] AOL

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Indeed. Too bad they never thrived after transitioning > to the x86 world, as they obviously had some amazing > coding talent. Yah. That. A lot of that. > -virtual memory of sorts Oh, yah, I forgot about that. PC/GEOS had memory

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Indeed. Too bad they never thrived after transitioning to the x86 world, as they obviously had some amazing coding talent. That's very cool regarding what it could on the PC. On the 64KB/1Mhz C64 (with only a 170KB 5.25" floppy), it implemented: - A GUI with -proportional fonts

Re: Windows Defender

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming wrote: > Pardon me for my tin-foil hat, but I don't really trust M$ to defend its own > OS > completely.  I want to be able to have someone else defending it, someone > whose > vested interest is NOT in defending the *_reputation_* of the OS.

Re: AOL

On 5 Aug 2009 at 22:49, Sean Houston wrote: > I remember Compuserve, Prodigy and AOL being the main 3 companies around. I > can't say I was ever aware they were ever known as anything but AOHell. Fidonet all the way, baby I ran a BBS for many years. I think I still have the 386 it was ru

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Ah cool. I never had a VIC2 started on a Timex Sinclair ZX-81 (Z-80 CPU) and then went to the C64. -sc From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT][Humor] AOL 6502 in the VIC 20, and the 6510

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Sweet! I eventually got their (Berkley Softworks) 512KB RAM pack, which was used only by GEOS. Had an Okidata OkiMate 10 color printer and 800KB 3.5" disk drive too.. woot! -sc From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:17 PM To: NT System A

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

I never used the PC version... -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: [OT][Humor] AOL On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Trivia Question: What was the

Re: Windows Defender

On 6 Aug 2009 at 11:01, James Hill wrote: > Haven't seen Defender do anything but I'm impressed with Microsoft Security > Essentials. Even in beta form I've seen it stop things that Avast missed. > > This is only based on experience with it on my home pc though. Pardon me for my tin-foil hat,

Re: [OT][Humor] AOL

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Ben Scott wrote: >  I think it was called "PC Link", but I might be getting that > confused with something else. > >  PC/GEOS, AKA GeoWorks Ensemble! I didn't read ahead in the thread to look at other answers before making mine. So more commentary: On Wed, Aug

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

6502 in the VIC 20, and the 6510 in the C=64 *is* the "later series" I mentioned Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _ From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE:

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

well, maybe the first AOL gui then ... I don't think they started with Windows 3.0 ... And yep, I had GEOS on my C=64, used the GeoPaint for making graphic diagrams of our dial backup system at the bank, the GeoWrite for the documentation .. ended up using GeoWrite in 1987 to create the directory a

Re: [OT][Humor] AOL

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Trivia Question: What was the _PRIOR_ service offered by the company > that eventually became AOL? I think it was called "PC Link", but I might be getting that confused with something else. > Bonus points for naming the supported platfo

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Actually it wasGeoProgramm� which came with Assembler, Linker, e� -sc From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT][Humor] AOL Good man! (although wasnt it technically the 6510?)

RE: Encrypt E-mail between two different domains...for free?

PKI is about mutual trust. If the remote server trusts your CA, then it'll accept the certificate your server presents as part of the STARTTLS command. Likewise, your server needs to trust whatever CA issued the certificate that the remote server presents to your server if it initiates the TLS c

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Good man! (although wasn���t it technically the 6510?) I bought the GeoAssembler package (and later the HitchHikers guide to GEOS, which gave me my first look at the internals of an event-driven OS) Good times. -sc From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, Au

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

Apparently so. I attached the test to an earlier reply to your message here as well, and it was also swallowed. Odd. Very odd. -sc -Original Message- From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:20 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The "

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

cut my home computing teeth on a C= VIC 20 and later the C=64 , learned machine language on the 6502 and a later series cpu chips Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _ From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

No... it was almost all "textual graphics" using the character mode of the C64, although there were a some areas with bitmap games and stuff too. Check out the "pictures" section at http://www.dsgames.net/qlink/q-link/qlink-history.htm Not sure they ever had a Geos version.. but Geos itse

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Ding Ding Ding! We have a WINNAH! -sc From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT][Humor] AOL it was Quantum Link ! Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

wasn't the initial C=64 and C=128 gui version running GeoWorks ? Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _ From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:53 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

it was Quantum Link ! Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _ From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:21 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT][Humor] AOL Correct on the bonus questions (It was a

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Yup... I still remember seeing the letter from Steve Case himself announcing they were terminating the original Commodore-only service after it was re-branded America Online and rolled out for PC and other platforms. -sc From: Sean Houston [mailto:seanthous...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [OT][Humor] AOL

I remember Compuserve, Prodigy and AOL being the main 3 companies around. I can't say I was ever aware they were ever known as anything but AOHell. -Sean On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > Correct on the bonus questions (It was a C64 and C128 service). > > > > No affil

RE: UO vs Security Filtering - WAS: Group Policy Doesn't apply

Hi, OU design caters for many things (delegation of administration is one, and management of GPO complexity is another). You generally want to limit the number of GPOs that need to be processed during logon, so an OU structure that logically groups users and computers into those that have commo

Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

Maybe you hit your quota? On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > OK.. I’ve replied to this twice now, and have not seen it hit the list > either time. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Correct on the bonus questions (It was a C64 and C128 service). No affiliation with Compuserve, however, so you lose your bonus. (However Compuserve and H&R Block were affiliated, so as a consolation prize you get to sit on TVs lap) I still need the name of the service. -sc Fr

Re: [OT][Humor] AOL

I thought they orgianally supported Commodore 64 based machines. Loaded the software and got a graphical environment. They owned Compuserve, at one time. And If I remember right, Compuserve was owned by H&R Block. On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > [assert NO_GOOLING_ALLOW

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

OK.. I've replied to this twice now, and have not seen it hit the list either time. Other replies to other subjects have. Anybody else? -sc From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The "Duh

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

(er... "googling") -sc -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: [OT][Humor] AOL [assert NO_GOOLING_ALLOWED] Trivia Question: What was the _PRIOR_ service offered by the com

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

[assert NO_GOOLING_ALLOWED] Trivia Question: What was the _PRIOR_ service offered by the company that eventually became AOL? Bonus points for naming the supported platforms. -sc -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 8:28 PM T

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

Dude. That's 1337. Now back to my parent's basement... -sc From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 6:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 yep, I saw that after I posted you are s 3l33t !

Re: OT: Symantec Rant

Thanks for the über quick reply. I hear your frustrations loud and clear and will keep my eyes open for trouble during the eval. period should we decide to give it a go. RS On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:58 PM, James Hill wrote: > It has improved since version 12.0 but it is still not good enough imo.

Re: OT: Symantec Rant

That was me! hehehehehe On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:28 PM, James Hill > wrote: > > Excuse me for you using the list to vent but I thought I might receive > some > > understanding from other Symantec vicitims. > > I feel your pain. > > > They *&$^

RE: Windows Defender

Haven't seen Defender do anything but I'm impressed with Microsoft Security Essentials. Even in beta form I've seen it stop things that Avast missed. This is only based on experience with it on my home pc though. -Original Message- From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Tues

RE: OT: Symantec Rant

It has improved since version 12.0 but it is still not good enough imo. The main issue I have had is bugs with backing up Exchange 2007 servers. The fixes in the earlier versions were simply to not use the features! Even in recent versions there are issues. This is the latest one to bite me:-

Re: OT: Symantec Rant

Errrmmm, do you mind if I ask specifically about your troubles with BE12.5? I've been very seriously considering moving to it, though I haven't installed the 60 day demo yet. I kinda figgered it would pretty much work in my fairly simple environment. It'd be nice to know the major gotchas. Than

RE: [OT][Humor] AOL

Laughed so hard I got a headache! Thanks! Need some Excedrin now. Gene Giannamore Abide International Inc. Technical Support 561 1st Street West Sonoma,Ca.95476 (707) 935-1577Office (707) 935-9387Fax (707) 766-4185Cell gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com www.abideinternational.co

Re: OT: Symantec Rant

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:28 PM, James Hill wrote: > Excuse me for you using the list to vent but I thought I might receive some > understanding from other Symantec vicitims. I feel your pain. > They *&$^ everything they touch these days. It's like the opposite of the Midas touch. Everything

OT: Symantec Rant

Excuse me for you using the list to vent but I thought I might receive some understanding from other Symantec vicitims. Do they make ANYTHING these days that "just works". After being bent over with their hopeless AV implementation on Server 2008 (Let's break shares on the server. No servers

[OT][Humor] AOL

I've discovered that if I play an AOL installation CD backwards, I get satanic messages. Then I tried playing it the other way, and something really bad happened: I got AOL. (Adapted from another quote; original author unknown.) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a reso

RE: Virus?

Virus total's numbers aren't very comforting if that IS actually a virus... Did you submit to McAfee? I'm curious as what they have to say. If you have support I would get in touch with them, this might be a 0-day? -Original Message- From: RAY ZORZ [mailto:rz...@azcorrections.gov] Sent:

RE: Hyper-V Manager

Thanks for the update, I did make it in early enough today to reboot the two servers that were having the problems. They both are working fine now. From: Miller Bonnie L. [mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:41 PM To: NT System Admin I

Re: FTP server ?

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Dennis Melahn wrote: > But my customers are accessing it with IE and due to the in-ability > of IE to give accurate feedback to the users (status bars, etc) To all the folks replying suggesting FileZilla/WinSCP/etc... not that I don't agree that just about anythi

RE: UO vs Security Filtering - WAS: Group Policy Doesn't apply

I understand that. But in this example he was both the creator and the manager of the GPO. So in my mind I don't understand the added complexity. -- Mike Gill From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re

RE: FTP server ?

Have them try the FileZilla FTP client ... Barely more complicated than copying a file with Explorer Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security -Original Message- From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:den...@advancedav.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 4:10 PM To: NT Syste

Re: Blackberry Server question.

BES also equals: - 1 Windows server, plus SQL or MSDE to support. If BES 4 (not 5), also one more server running the Exchange admin tools. - higher utilization on your Exchange server, 1 BB = 2.5 users - headache of having one more service account with god-level rights to every mail

RE: IE8

The biggest complaint I have right now is on WS08 servers, a shortcut to IE using an IP address link (which worked fine with IE7) comes up as a hung iexplore process. Cut and paste the same IP address into the address bar and it opens fine--haven't found a solution for this one yet. -Bonnie >

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

yep, I saw that after I posted you are s 3l33t ! Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _ From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:56 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the

RE: Virus?

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/d7935fdf6102f1fd869f6337c45e7d690e40ae9c31ac5d7c7f3ee3d141a14a4a-1249508892 McAfee still isn't cleaning it, but if this site is legit, and Malwarebytes is also catching the "right thing", then a lot of vendors aren't catching it either. Oy. >>> "Mike Fren

RE: Hyper-V Manager

No problems here so far either. I would mention though that if you have patched your Hyper-V server(s) with WS08 SP2 that you need to install the new version of the integration tools on all of the Hyper-V clients--that could be the problem. WS08 SP2 clients will have the matching version alrea

PowerShell training - recommended!

So.just had 3 days of PowerShell training. Being well versed (and still using on occasion!) DOS and also reasonably versed in other scripting (KiXtart, etc), I found the class HUGELY useful. Even with my experience there was certainly more than "just a few things learned in three days". In

Re: FTP server ?

For FireFox users, FireFTP is excellent. Linda Angus Scott-Fleming wrote: On 5 Aug 2009 at 16:10, Dennis Melahn wrote: Does anyone have a different recommendation? I need something that is completely brainless to use from the client end. FileZilla is OK, but I use

Re: FTP server ?

On 5 Aug 2009 at 16:10, Dennis Melahn wrote: > Does anyone have a different recommendation? I need something that is > completely brainless to use from the client end. FileZilla is OK, but I use Total Commander or WinSCP http://winscp.sourceforge.net for any FTP work where I really need a GU

Re: Blackberry Server question.

Martin is exactly right. We started with BB's almost 4 years ago with 200 phones up front. Because of the amount of hardware being purchased we were given all the BES licenses we needed, which included licenses for 2 BES server and 250 CAL's. This year they decided anyone with more than 50 phones

RE: Blackberry Server question.

No it doesn't, but it is important to understand the costs of having an in-house (BES) system. You are going to have to buy the following Blackberry Enterprise Server User CAL's T-Support (unless you want to fly with no support). Now this of course isn't including the cost of a server and a

Re: Blackberry Server question.

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Todd Lemmiksoo wrote: > Nextel is telling us that it will cost $20/month per phone to use > the phones with an in-house Blackberry server. Is this what you > are paying also? (BES = BlackBerry Enterprise Server, one of the "in-house" options) We used to have a

RE: Blackberry Server question.

Having never bought a Blackberry I couldn't say for certain but my assumption is they're charging you for the data plan which seems reasonable to me. You will need to pay for the BES server license plus the BES device CALs (or whatever they call them precisely). There is a cheaper BES "Pro" vers

Blackberry Server question.

Our sales guys are getting new Nextel Blackberry's. I want to look into setting up our own Blackberry server. Nextel is telling us that it will cost $20/month per phone to use the phones with an in-house Blackberry server. Is this what you are paying also? Doesn't this make it cost prohibitive to h

Re: FTP server ?

+1 for FileZilla On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:31 PM, wrote: > I would recommend that your clients use the free and easy to use FileZilla > because it will give them the feedback they need. > > That's what I recommend to the clients that access my employer's ftp site. > They too, like to us IE for f

Re: FTP server ?

I would recommend that your clients use the free and easy to use FileZilla because it will give them the feedback they need. That's what I recommend to the clients that access my employer's ftp site. They too, like to us IE for ftp, and I discourage that for various reasons. ASB --Origin

FTP server ?

I have customers complaining about my FTP site. I currently use Secure FTP by Globalscape. I like it and think it is rock solid when used with an ftp client. But my customers are accessing it with IE and due to the in-ability of IE to give accurate feedback to the users (status bars, etc) the u

Re: UO vs Security Filtering - WAS: Group Policy Doesn't apply

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Don Guyer wrote: > Even though you use Security Filtering, the GPO still has to be applied to a > container (OU). You could just link all GPOs to a high-level OU, and then use filtering (GPO permissions) to be selective at lower levels. We do a little of both.

Re: Printer brands (was: spooler SubSystem App errors)

m, short of > actually sending someone out to piss on my shoes. > > I just keep hoping this systemic dysfunction doesn't spread to the > ProCurve division. > > -- Ben > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~

Printer brands (was: spooler SubSystem App errors)

[aggregate reply to multiple people] On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Ralph Smith wrote: > They worked OK, while they worked, but one problem I’ve had is > that once they are out of warranty they are hard to fix because I can’t find > parts. I've had the same trouble with our recent HP's. HP se

RE: SAN EOL

Thanks for the reply and thanks to you also, Brian. Must be age...seven years just doesn't last as long as it used to when I was in school. From: egold...@gmail.com To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: SAN EOL Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:46:56 -0400 well, 5 years is ger

Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

I need to have it done in my right eye. I am kinda worried about it because when I tried to wear glasses I guess it messed with my brain since it was used to everything being off balanced that I felt really sick after wearing them for only a few minutes and it took hours for that feeling to go a

Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

Heh. I was 20/400 in one eye, 20/425 in the other. It's a freakin' gift, I tell ya. I won't call it a miracle, but it's close. Kurt On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:52, Erik Goldoff wrote: > I had lasik in August of 2003, prior to that I had the coke-bottle looking > glasses, going back as far as seco

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

I am so ahead of you. -sc From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:12 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 tell him/her I'll be glad to trade my $5 bill for a $10 anytime, to help out. I'm just tha

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

Same here.. I spent $2500 for my left eye. My right eye was fine. About 8 years ago. Money well spent! I could handle contacts for about 2 days and I was it. -Original Message- From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issu

RE: UO vs Security Filtering - WAS: Group Policy Doesn't apply

I'm confused..or maybe am just reading this wrong. Excuse me if I am rehashing things already known. Even though you use Security Filtering, the GPO still has to be applied to a container (OU). Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox & Roach/Tr

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

I had lasik in August of 2003, prior to that I had the coke-bottle looking glasses, going back as far as second grade ... It wasn't perfect for me, but still good, 6 years later and my vision is about 20/40 , compared to over 20/200 or worse ( I don't remember ) ... I do suffer from dry eyes now

RE: keylogger help

We purchased Spector Pro for this issue. I've got it installed on a test computer, and it is extremely intensive, as far as the data collected. Tracks usage, and takes screenshots on events. Every time the left mouse button is clicked, or double-clicked, every time the right button is clicked, e

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

My wife had this done a little over a year ago. Man that was weird to sit there and watch. She just had her one year checkup and everything is perfect. -Original Message- From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subj

RE: SAN EOL

well, 5 years is geriatric nowadays for computer storage, *especially* supporting spinning spindles at the version of technology they were issued with Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _ From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: Computer BLOWS UP with spooler SubSystem App errors

On 5 Aug 2009 at 12:17, Vicky Spelshaus wrote: > Dell is what I've been using as well - we got killer pricing under the > state contract the year the HPs became problematic. I've never looked > back. And I too was someone who ONLY bought HP printers for years. > Well... and Epson for dot matri

Event ID 513 souce CAPI2 on server 2008

Following the directions here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc734021(WS.10).aspx Get to step 5 in the Verify section and it doesn't say what to do if the "Write Name" 'System Writer'" isn't displayed in the list. Any ideas? Thanks Webster ~ Finally, powerful endpoint securit

Re: UO vs Security Filtering - WAS: Group Policy Doesn't apply

Not all server operators are Group Policy managers. So putting the users into OU's can be done by one set of Admins while the creation and implementation of Group Policy can be done by a different set of Admins... - Original Message - From: Mike Gill To: NT System Admin Issues

RE: UO vs Security Filtering - WAS: Group Policy Doesn't apply

It seems I have noticed lately on the list, people using OU's for assigning group policies to people or groups of people which are not used to delegate special rights over that OU. It's my understanding that this is what OU's were meant for, even though this method would also work. If I were to

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

Best Money I've spent it a long time. It's weird, I only get a little halo off of yellow street signs. -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Da

RE: SAN EOL

I was going to say the same thing. From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN EOL HP definitely does. 7 years asset lifecycle seems pretty reasonable to me. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@

Re: VBScript Regular expression help

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Christopher Bodnar wrote: > myRegExp.Pattern = "[^\x22]*" That says, "Give me everything that's not a quote", not "give me everything quoted". So, if your target string is: FOO "SERVER1" BAR "SERVER2" BAZ You will get matches of "FOO ", "SERVER1", " B

RE: SAN EOL

HP definitely does. 7 years asset lifecycle seems pretty reasonable to me. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SAN EOL I found out today that

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

tell him/her I'll be glad to trade my $5 bill for a $10 anytime, to help out. I'm just that kind of guy ! Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _ From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:04 AM To: NT System Ad

RE: AT&T SMTP server problems

Yeah. I'm mostly happy with Verizon for my personal use. Company doesn't pay for cell phones.. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Gene Giannamore [mailto:gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:50 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: AT&T SMTP server pro

Re: VBScript Regular expression help

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ben Scott wrote: >" ( [^"] ) " That should be: " ( [^"]* ) " >myRegExp.Pattern = """([^""])""" Likewise: myRegExp.Pattern = """([^""]*)""" -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

The prep takes longer than the actual procedure... mine was about 30secs per eye. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1

Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

Understand the squeamishness. But, it's really a pretty easy procedure, and the doctor will explain it thoroughly, if he/she is competent. Get good recommendations, and you should be fine. It's probably gotten better and easier since I had it done so long ago, but it was dang easy even then. Kur

SAN EOL

I found out today that our EMC CX500 is end of life for production with support EOL around 2011. We got the CX500 around 2004 so it sure doesn't seem like it's been in production. Does anybody know what IBM or HP has for EOL interval on their SAN's? (director is curious) thx __

RE: Computer BLOWS UP with spooler SubSystem App errors

We purchased about 15 Dell 1700 and 1710 printers a few years ago, starting in 2005. They worked OK, while they worked, but one problem I've had is that once they are out of warranty they are hard to fix because I can't find parts. Out of the 15 we purchased, I've only got 10 still working, and 2

RE: AT&T SMTP server problems

Had same exact problem with a Verizon usb727. Coworker handed over his v740 to try out, and sending worked again. Should be getting a replacement pc770 2 in 1 in a few days. Took 1 minute on phone with my Verizon sales rep to resolve, and we are a very small business account. I am extremely happ

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

That's awesome.. most folks I've talked to have at least a little halation > -Original Message- > From: Ames Matthew B [mailto:mba...@qinetiq.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:31 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > I had the same

Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

Sure, why not. On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > As long as you don’t have high intraocular pressure (i.e. lead up to > glaucoma), you are probably good. > > > > As for the procedure, you want the straight dope of what it’s like? > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Sherry A

Re: VBScript Regular expression help

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Christopher Bodnar wrote: > This does exactly what I want it to do, for the “{“ character: > myRegExp.Pattern = "[^{]*\{([^}]*)\}" > I want the exact same function, but for the double quote character. First, an optimization. The above pattern, expanded with white

RE: VBScript Regular expression help

Thanks for the reply Mike, ended up with this for the Pattern. Does exactly what I was looking for: Dim myRegExp, myMatches, myMatch Set myRegExp = New RegExp myRegExp.Pattern = "[^\x22]*" myRegExp.Global = True Set myMatches = myRegExp.Execute(strQueryString)

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

I wish I could have Lasik, been turned down 3 times. Good luck! From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 Let us know what they s

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

As long as you don't have high intraocular pressure (i.e. lead up to glaucoma), you are probably good. As for the procedure, you want the straight dope of what it's like? -sc From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:03 PM To: NT System Adm

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

I had the same op in the UK about 3 years ago Was expensive but certainly the best "investment" of my money. I had to stop wearing contacts due to scaring on the inside of my eye lids, so was back to glasses which was a pain. Fortunately I don't suffer from the halo affect at all, although

RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

That's a "glorious" 97 seconds! GLORIOUS DAMMIT!! -sc > -Original Message- > From: Joe Tinney [mailto:jtin...@lastar.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:20 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > She got a big rock. ;-) > > ..for

  1   2   >