Ignorantly asks Lie about it? They have problems with the truth ?
Thanks,
Mathew
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Google, What Happened To 'Do No Evil'?
On Wed, Nov 30,
Congratulations and best of luck at the new position! Hope to see you
online again sometime.
--
Espi
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Ziots, Edward wrote:
> I just wanted to reach out to the list, that I am going to be moving on
> from my Security Engineer position in two weeks, to a seni
I dont see how this is a Google failure. Its installed and tracked by the
carrier. Its not inherent in any OS - its an installed component found in
*many* mobile devices across just about all modern platforms.
Or am I mistaken?
--
Espi
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Stu Sjouwerman
wrote:
This.
--
Mike Gill
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Google, What Happened To 'Do No Evil'?
Meanwhile, I have to wonder why you're so determined to blame Google for
wha
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:02 PM, David wrote:
> Found a source saying that Verizon phones do not.
Verizon has issued a statement saying that they're not using
CarrerIQ. But others have found CarrierIQ reporting to servers with
"vzw" in their names. Given Verizon's history, I would expect Veri
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Stu Sjouwerman
wrote:
> Google, What Happened To 'Do No Evil'?
> This particular software is installed on 142 million handsets, including
> modern BlackBerry and Nokia phones ...
I haven't been paying too much attention to this, but the very fact
that it gets in
The Wired article lists a few ways to posibly see it.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jonathan Link wrote:
> They probably roll their own.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:02 PM, David wrote:
>
>> Found a source saying that Verizon phones do not. Hope they're right,
>> 'cuz I sure can't find it
They probably roll their own.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:02 PM, David wrote:
> Found a source saying that Verizon phones do not. Hope they're right,
> 'cuz I sure can't find it (Goodthing™).
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Steven Peck wrote:
>
>> Evidently it can hide itself.
>>
>>
>
Found a source saying that Verizon phones do not. Hope they're right, 'cuz
I sure can't find it (Goodthing™).
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Steven Peck wrote:
> Evidently it can hide itself.
>
>
> http://androidsecuritytest.com/features/logs-and-services/loggers/carrieriq/
> ironic link as
To be fair, SAV 9 was a completely different animal. I hated SAV 8 and SAV
9, SAV 10 barely better.
SEP 11, while not perfect, is not the same beast as SAV 9.
YMMV
*
Anyone remember a year or two back when McAfee’s false positive declared
explorer.exe a virus ?
I worked with Trend Mi
Evidently it can hide itself.
http://androidsecuritytest.com/features/logs-and-services/loggers/carrieriq/
ironic link as the source link is busted
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:GIxQjEZuxRwJ:androidsecuritytest.com/features/logs-and-services/loggers/carrieriq/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct
You will be busy then. Last version I used was 9 I think. I had a 25 to
30% failure rate on upgrades of that maybe 10% would do so much damage the
machine had to be rebuilt/reimaged. When we went from Symantec to NOD32 I
staged the it so only about 5 to 10 machines per day were moved. I would
r
Running a Verizon Droid X, I can't find any trace of CarrierIQ -- and this
is the 2nd time I've searched for it. Good news, I reckon...But I agree
with your assessment. What can be misused, assuredly will be.
David
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Stu Sjouwerman
wrote:
> Google, What Happened
You think he still has it?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:11 PM, John Cook wrote:
> Please mail me your Man card!
>
> John W. Cook
> System Administrator
> Partnership For Strong Families
> 5950 NW 1st Place
> Gainesville, Fl 32607
> Office (352) 244-1610
> Cell (352) 215-6944
> MCSE, MCP+I, MCT
Please mail me your Man card!
John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@life
No, EZ I think you are very wrong. I think you are quite "gamey". I can smell
you all the way in middle TN! :)
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
> Sent: Wednesda
Trying not too, but I have been off the market for so long, I lost all
my "game"
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
email:ezi...@lifespan.org
phone:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: W
There's no Win7 driver for the 1012, but we were able to get it working using
Vista or XP drivers. Every single app printed fine, including IE-until we
upgraded to v9. Then we started getting javascript errors every time we tried
to print from IE.
John
From: Mark Boeck [mailto:netadmin...@gma
Do you use forwarders? If so, are they the same for both servers?
What about conditional forwarders? Are any setup? If so, are they the
same for both servers?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Greg Sweers wrote:
> No we have only a few clients on RR and none of them use it for anything
> but
No we have only a few clients on RR and none of them use it for anything but
internet. All email is hosted.
For the last 2 days since I have pointed them to another DC running DNS they
have had no issues, but that DC is at another office. If I manually set one of
them back to the suspect DNS t
Funny, I was just looking for the same thing. In the email from Symantec there
was a serial number used to access File Connect.
"The serial number you will need to gain access to your software within
FileConnect is: M---"
Thanks,
Chris Blair
-Original Message-
From: Damien Solodow
You should call Symantec support line. They can get all the info you need.
Just let them know that you're taking over for so-and-so. Should be able to
give you the numbers you'll need in the future.
Hope the Backup Exec support is better than the Netbackup support...
From: David [mailto:blaz
I'm betting that you may have a serial number, more like a product number,
not the actual license keys...
David
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Eric Brouwer wrote:
> I tried that. The serial number I have is in this format:
> 01-2345-6789-004265. It says it's not valid. I also looked at t
It would be on your license form/email. Should start with M.
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:ithelp.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Iss
I had no end of frustration trying to figure out which number Symantec wanted.
I had serial, order, license, activation numbers. Some of them quite long and
no way to copy and paste into their web form. So happy when I dumbed BE for
DPM, Ghost for WDS, and SAV for Vipre, now Forefront. Maybe t
If you have the license keys and access to Symantec's licensing website, you
can download it from there.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:ithelp.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Backup Exec ver. 12.0
Geetings,
W
Even better.
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Backup Exec ver. 12.0
You should be able to download the product from the following website using the
serial number you currently have.
https://
I tried that. The serial number I have is in this format:
01-2345-6789-004265. It says it's not valid. I also looked at the
besernum.xml file and the serial number listed there does not work
either.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Harry Singh wrote:
> You should be able to download the produ
Do you have current software maintenance? I'd just go to 2012 R3.
The trail version that is on their website is the fully functional version,
just without license keys.
It's about a 4GB download. Grab a coffee.
http://trialware.norton.com/files/fc/Backup_Exec_2010_13.0_R3_SP1_MultiPlatf
orms_Mult
What you really need is the Symantec support account info. You would be able
to download any purchased media from the support site.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:ithelp.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
You should be able to download the product from the following website using
the serial number you currently have.
https://fileconnect.symantec.com
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Eric Brouwer wrote:
> Geetings,
>
> With my predecessor completely out of the picture now, I'm evaluating
> every
It should still be available via FileConnect using your Serial Number.
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:ithelp.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:00 PM
To: NT System
Geetings,
With my predecessor completely out of the picture now, I'm evaluating
everything he was in charge of. One of his duties was setting up
backup routines, and testing them. I am not able to find our
installation media for Backup Exec 12. I have the license keys, but
no way to install it.
I could not get my LJ 1012 to cooperate with win 7 pro either (this was
prior to IE9)
but... my problem's not printer driver related.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:40 PM, John Hornbuckle <
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> wrote:
> Been there, done that. There are known issues with IE9 and certain
>
**
**
**
**
**
(i think) The problem originates from NOT following the "how do you want to
use IE9" first run wizard.
Failing to walk through that (i believe) does not create the folder and set
securities on it.
*That KB article is only 1/2 right:*
*Step 5 - Set Security*
That CANNOT be done runnin
Start here for the archives search:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/utilities/login/login/?
Warm regards,
Stu
From: Haritwal, Dhiraj [mailto:dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Central Log Management/Monitoring Solution
Don't take it personally..
John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lif
Can I assign the exact same configuration to 2 identical serial
interfaces on a Cisco 2900 router?
My situation:
2910 router
2 WIC T1 serial interface cards (S0/0 and S0/1)
We are only using 1 interface (S0/1), the other (S0/0) is not connected
(and administratively down)
I would like to copy the
Don't worry if I am close in the FLA, we will meet up again, and yes
last time was fun, even though you had your eyes on the cute waitress.
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
email:ezi...@lifespan.org
phone:401-639-3505
-Original Messa
> Kindly suggest some options.
Look at the archives? The topic comes up several times a month.
From: Haritwal, Dhiraj [mailto:dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Central Log Management/Monitoring Solution
Hi,
I am looking f
Congrats Ed! Good for you.
From: "Ziots, Edward"
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:30 PM
Subject: Moving on, leaving the list for a bit
I just wanted to reach out to the list, that I am going to be moving on
from my Security Engi
Congrats on the new gig!
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Ziots, Edward wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, I am sure its going to be a PITA for this one,
> learning from the ground up….
>
> ** **
>
> Z
>
> ** **
>
> Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
>
> Security Engineer***
Any time you head this way shoot me a line, You have my address. Margaritaville
is always fun!
John W. Cook
System Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
Roger that Ken...
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
email:ezi...@lifespan.org
phone:401-639-3505
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Anyone using WINMTR from Sourceforge to check the latency on their
networks. Been using the tool, which comes in 32/64bit version seems to
work well, that with a packet sniffer (wireshark) sounds like a nice
combo to troubleshoot issues.
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Sec
I know they aren't
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
email:ezi...@lifespan.org
phone:401-639-3505
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 3:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Thanks for the advice, I am sure its going to be a PITA for this one,
learning from the ground up
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
email:ezi...@lifespan.org
phone:401-639-3505
From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:dean.cunning.
Already loss a lot of hair... this will finish off the shinny DOME J
At least it will be a learning experience, I know symantec isn't the
greatest, but it is what it is.
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
email:ezi...@lifespan.or
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Erik Goldoff wrote:
> Had a bit of an issue with that a few years back after an acquisition, I
> could not get any of the newly integrated staff to explain why we should use
> already saturated critical network infrastructure, potentially displacing
> revenue, so t
But...but...but... didn't you know the INTERNET SHOULD BE FREE?!?!?!
http://freenetworkfoundation.org/
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
P.S. - For those of you that don't know me well - I'm joking.
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.c
Had a bit of an issue with that a few years back after an acquisition, I
could not get any of the newly integrated staff to explain why we should
use already saturated critical network infrastructure, potentially
displacing revenue, so they could simulate a $5 transistor radio !!!
On Tue, Nov 29,
Hi,
I am looking for a solution to monitor/manage all IT Infra logs/events
ie. Windows Servers / AIX Servers / SAN Switches / SAN / firewalls /
Network Switches / Routers / all databases etc. Kindly suggest some
options.
Regards,
Dhiraj
-
That first line was tongue-in-cheek. I forgot the smiley
On 30 November 2011 09:18, Ken Schaefer wrote:
> Why would they need one? To cover their tracks.
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers
>
> Ken
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 30 November 2
Why would they need one? To cover their tracks.
Cheers
Ken
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 5:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Delegation question
Why would they need to? They already have one
However, anyone with DA access is a ri
Why would they need to? They already have one
However, anyone with DA access is a risk and a certain amount of trust
needs to be given. If you're worried about that you need a separate team or
individual monitoring the access to and use of privileged accounts, whether
it be resetting passwords, ac
And DA's are a different breed of human that would not "resets a DA
password and uses it for nefarious purposes?"
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:05 AM, James Rankin wrote:
> Thats a bit crazy. What happens when rogue helpdesk guy resets a DA
> password and uses it for nefarious purposes? Prevention i
56 matches
Mail list logo
