Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.20.x branch in two weeks

On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 6:48 PM Mark Harfouche wrote: > >> Do you think the proposal is not in compliance? There is no requirement >> that we drop anything more than 42 months old, it is just recommended. The >> change in the Python release cycle has created some difficulty. With the >> yearly

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.19.4 release

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.19.4. NumPy 1.19.4 is a quick release to revert the OpenBLAS library version. It was hoped that the 0.3.12 OpenBLAS version used in 1.19.3 would work around the Microsoft fmod bug, but problems in some docker

[Numpy-discussion] Welcome Chunlin to the NumPy development team.

Hi All, Welcome Chunlin Fang, aka Qiyu8, to the NumPy development team. He has made substantial contributions to the SIMD infrastructure, both code and reviews, and we look forward to his continuing work. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.19.5 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.19.5. NumPy 1.19.5 is a short bugfix release. Apart from fixing several bugs, the main improvement is an update to OpenBLAS 0.3.13 that works around the Windows 2004 fmod bug while not breaking execution on other

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy EOL Versions?

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:47 AM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:04 AM Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 4:41 PM Matti Picus >> wrote: >> >>> This message ended up in my spam box for som

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy EOL Versions?

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:04 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 4:41 PM Matti Picus wrote: > >> This message ended up in my spam box for some reason, sorry for the late >> reply. >> >> >> We typically release a new version twice a year, and support two >> versions at a time.

[Numpy-discussion] Sayed Adel has joined the developer team.

Hi All, Sayed Adel is now part of the developer team. His SIMD work has been substantial and ongoing, may it long continue. Welcome Sayed. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.6.0

On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 8:59 AM Tyler Reddy wrote: > Hi all, > > On behalf of the SciPy development team I'm pleased to announce > the release of SciPy 1.6.0. > > Sources and binary wheels can be found at: > https://pypi.org/project/scipy/ > and at: >

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.20.0 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.20.0rc2. This NumPy release is the largest to date, containing some 684 merged pull requests contributed by 184 people. See the list of highlights below. The Python versions supported for this release are 3.7-3.9,

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.21.0rc2 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.0rc2. The highlights are - continued SIMD work covering more functions and platforms, - initial work on the new dtype infrastructure and casting, - universal2 wheels for Python 3.8 and Python 3.9 on

[Numpy-discussion] PR for keywordlabeler

Hi All, There is a pending PR that uses keywordlabeler to automatically label PRs and issues. Installing the app requires giving it write permissions to PRs and issues. This isn't different than with the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] request to remove the numpy-aarch64 package from PyPI

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 10:47 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > FYI, I noticed this package that claimed to be maintained by us: > https://pypi.org/project/numpy-aarch64/. That's not ours, so I tried to > contact the author (no email provided, but guessed the same username on > GitHub) and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] copy="never" discussion and no deprecation cycle?

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:52 AM Stefan van der Walt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, at 16:23, Stephan Hoyer wrote: > > This happens all the time. Even if we make copy='never' an error *today*, > users will be encountering existing versions of NumPy for years into the > future, so we won't be able

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.7.0

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:45 PM Tyler Reddy wrote: > Hi all, > > On behalf of the SciPy development team I'm pleased to announce > the release of SciPy 1.7.0. > > Sources and binary wheels can be found at: > https://pypi.org/project/scipy/ > and at: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.7.0

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:38 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:45 PM Tyler Reddy > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> On behalf of the SciPy development team I'm pleased to announce >> the release of SciPy 1.7.0. >> >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 2020 NumPy survey results

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:41 PM Inessa Pawson wrote: > Hi, everyone! > In 2020, the NumPy survey team in partnership with students and faculty > from a Master’s course in Survey Methodology jointly hosted by the > University of Michigan and the University of Maryland conducted the first >

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.21.0 release

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.0. The highlights are - continued SIMD work covering more functions and platforms, - initial work on the new dtype infrastructure and casting, - universal2 wheels for Python 3.8 and Python 3.9 on

[Numpy-discussion] Proposals for NumPy 1.22.0

Hi All, Here are some proposals for the NumPy 1.22.0 release currently in development. 1. Drop support for Python 3.7 (3.10 will be available). 2. Drop manylinux1 wheels. 3. Drop manylinux2010 wheels? 4. Use ILP64 BLAS for 64 bit wheels. Thoughts? Chuck

[Numpy-discussion] Accept NEP 35 as final

Hi All, It is proposed to accept NEP 35 as final. It is discussed in issue #17075 . If there is no opposition I will put up a pull request in a

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.20.3 release

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.20.3. NumPy 1,20.3 is a bugfix release containing several fixes merged to the main branch after the NumPy 1.20.2 release. The Python versions supported for this release are 3.7-3.9. Wheels can be downloaded from

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.21.0rc1 has been released.

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.0rc1. The highlights are - continued SIMD work covering more functions and platforms, - initial work on the new dtype infrastructure and casting, - improved documentation, - improved annotations, - the new

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.20.1 released.

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.20.1. NumPy 1.20.1 is a rapid bugfix release fixing several bugs and regressions reported after the 1.20.0 release. The Python versions supported for this release are 3.7-3.9. Wheels can be downloaded from PyPI

[Numpy-discussion] Pearu Peterson has joined the NumPy developers team.

Hi All, Pearu Peterson has joined the NumPy developers team. Pearu was responsible for contributing f2py and much of distutils in the early days of NumPy. Welcome back Pearu. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Question about optimizing random_standard_normal

On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 2:32 AM wrote: > I tried to implement a different implementation of the ziggurat method for > generating standard normal distributions that is about twice as fast and > uses 2/3 of the memory than the old one. > I tested the implementation separately and am very confident

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Math Inspector Beta

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 4:19 PM Matt Calhoun wrote: > Hi Everyone! I have been using numpy for an extremely long time, but this > is the first time emailing the list. I recently released the beta version > of my free open source math app called math inspector, and so far the > response has been

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.20.2 released.

Charles R Harris Sun, Feb 7, 2:23 PM to numpy-discussion, SciPy, SciPy-User, bcc: python-announce-list Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.20.2. NumPy 1,20.2 is a bugfix release containing several fixes merged to the main branch after the NumPy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-coded dot 1000x faster than numpy?

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:02 AM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:36 AM Neal Becker wrote: > >> See my earlier email - this is fedora 33, python3.9. >> >> I'm using fedora 33 standard numpy. >> ldd says: >> >&g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-coded dot 1000x faster than numpy?

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:36 AM Neal Becker wrote: > See my earlier email - this is fedora 33, python3.9. > > I'm using fedora 33 standard numpy. > ldd says: > > /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/core/_ > multiarray_umath.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: > linux-vdso.so.1

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-coded dot 1000x faster than numpy?

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:10 AM Neal Becker wrote: > I have code that performs dot product of a 2D matrix of size (on the > order of) [1000,16] with a vector of size [1000]. The matrix is > float64 and the vector is complex128. I was using numpy.dot but it > turned out to be a bottleneck. > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-coded dot 1000x faster than numpy?

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:47 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:10 AM Neal Becker wrote: > >> I have code that performs dot product of a 2D matrix of size (on the >> order of) [1000,16] with a vector of size [1000]. The matrix is >> float6

Re: [Numpy-discussion] files for 3D printing of NumPy logo

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 2:24 PM Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > Andrej Krecker, who is a 3D printing engineer who likes NumPy, shared 3D > printing files for the NumPy logo. It comes in two flavors, a really 3-D > version, and a flatter (~0.5 cm thick) 2-D version. Check them out at >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Question about optimizing random_standard_normal

On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 5:27 AM wrote: > Well, I can tell you why it needs to be backward compatible! I use random > numbers fairly frequently, and to unit test them I set a specific seed and > then make sure I get the same answers. > > Hmm, I guess that makes sense. I tried to adjust my

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.21.2 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.2. NumPy 1.21.2 is a maintenance release that fixes bugs discovered after 1.21.1. It also provides 64 bit manylinux Python 3.10.0rc1 wheels for downstream testing. Note that Python 3.10 is not yet final. There

[Numpy-discussion] OS X universal2 wheels

Hi All, I note that the numpy universal wheels for Mac are marked "10_9" whereas the wheels for Arm64 are marked '11_0'. Does that need to be fixed? Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org

[Numpy-discussion] Drop LGTM testing.

Hi All, LGTM on github uses Python 3.7, which causes a problem if we drop 3.7 support. LGTM is nice for pointing to possible code improvements, but we mostly ignore it anyway. There are probably standalone code analysers that would serve our needs as well, so dropping it seems the easiest way

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Drop LGTM testing.

On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 2:35 PM Eric Wieser wrote: > This might be worth creating a github issue for simply so we can tag > someone working at LGTM; they've been helpful in the past, and it's > possible we just need to fiddle with some configuration to make it work. > > It's also worth noting

Re: [Numpy-discussion] reducing effort spent on wheel builds?

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 8:02 AM Charles R Harris wrote: > I spent so much time updating the wheels builds to 64 bit BLAS mostly > because > > >- I needed to actually understand how multibuild worked (and docs are >minimal). >- I don't know powershell (and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] reducing effort spent on wheel builds?

I spent so much time updating the wheels builds to 64 bit BLAS mostly because - I needed to actually understand how multibuild worked (and docs are minimal). - I don't know powershell (and docs are hard to find). - I don't know azure works at a lower level (and docs are hard to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.7.1

On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 8:31 PM Tyler Reddy wrote: > Hi all, > > On behalf of the SciPy development team I'm pleased to announce > the release of SciPy 1.7.1, which is a bug fix release. > > Sources and binary wheels can be found at: > https://pypi.org/project/scipy/ > and at:

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy Python 3.10.0rc1 wheels.

Hi All, There are now NumPy Python 3.10.0rc1 wheels available for 64 bit Linux on Intel. You can install them from the nightly builds using "pip install -i https://pypi.anaconda.org/scipy-wheels-nightly/simple numpy". Test away. Cheers, Charles Harris

[Numpy-discussion] Matti Picus and Sebastian Berg added to org-admin

Hi All, Matti Picus and Sebastian Berg have been added to the org-admin team on github. That will allow them to help maintain the github site going forward. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org

[Numpy-discussion] Dropping Python 3.7 for NumPy 1.22

Hi All, This is to propose dropping Python 3.7 for NumPy 1.22. Doing so will allow merging the array API standard (keyword only arguments), simplify removing import time compiles , allow making 64 bit pickles

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.21.3 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.3. NumPy 1.21.3 is a maintenance release that fixes a few bugs discovered after the 1.21.2 release. It also provides 64 bit Python 3.10.0 wheels. Note a few oddities about the Python 3.10 wheels: - There

[Numpy-discussion] Spam in PRs?

Hi All, Anyone know why/how app.netlify got into scipy.org? See https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/pull/417 for an example. More information at https://app.netlify.com/sites/condescending-hopper-c3ed30/deploys . Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

[Numpy-discussion] Re: What happened to the numpy.random documentation?

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:36 AM Paul M. wrote: > Hi All, > > The documentation of Numpy's submodules used to have a fairly standard > structure as shown here in the 1.16 documentation: > > https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.16.1/reference/routines.random.html > > Now the same page in the API

[Numpy-discussion] Python 3.10 update

Hi All, A quick update on the status of wheels for Python 3.10 on Mac and Windows. The azure folks have dropped 32 bit Python 3.10 for Windows, so, unless we complain, there will be no 32 bit versions for 3.10. Likewise, multibuild only supports universal2 wheels Python 3.10 on Mac, so make sure

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Python 3.10 update

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 3:44 PM Andrew Nelson wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 07:50, Charles R Harris > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> It would be nice if someone could test the nightly universal2 wheels for >> Mac, they can be installed with >> >> pip install -i

[Numpy-discussion] Drop 32 bit manylinux wheels

Hi All, Dropping 32 manylinux wheels was discussed in a triage meeting some time ago and the general consensus was to do so. However, it has never been run past the larger community on the discussion list, so this is that. Note that we have already dropped 32 bit manylinux wheels for the upcoming

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.21.5 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.5. NumPy 1.21.5 is a maintenance release that fixes a few bugs discovered after the 1.21.4 release and does some maintenance to extend the 1.21.x lifetime. The Python versions supported in this release are

[Numpy-discussion] No credits left in travis for 1.22.0 release

Hi All, We need to get more credits in order to run MacPython/numpy-wheels builds on travis. Anyone recall how to go about this? Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Numpy-discussion] Re: No credits left in travis for 1.22.0 release

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 6:26 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > We need to get more credits in order to run MacPython/numpy-wheels builds > on travis. Anyone recall how to go about this? > > Chuck > MacPython has used 800550 of 80 credits. NumPy has used 625860

[Numpy-discussion] Re: No credits left in travis for 1.22.0 release

On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:30 PM matti picus wrote: > We are back in business with 100k credits. > Matti > > Thanks Matti. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22.0 has been released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.22.0. NumPy 1.22.0 is a big release featuring the work of 153 contributors spread over 609 pull requests. There have been many improvements, highlights are: - Annotations of the main namespace are essentially

[Numpy-discussion] Re: An article on numpy data types

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 2:54 PM Warren Weckesser wrote: > On 12/28/21, Lev Maximov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:43 PM Evgeni Burovski > > > > wrote: > > > >> Very nice overview! > >> > >> One question and one suggestion: > >> > >> 1. Is integer wraparound guaranteed for signed ints, or

[Numpy-discussion] Re: An article on numpy data types

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 4:12 AM Lev Maximov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:59 AM Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 2:54 PM Warren Weckesser < >> warren.weckes...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 12

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22.0rc3 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.22.0rc3. NumPy 1.22.0rc3 is a big release featuring the work of 152 contributors spread over 602 pull requests. There have been many improvements, highlights are: - Annotations of the main namespace are

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22.0rc1 released.

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.22.0rc1. NumPy 1.22.0rc1 is a big release featuring the work of 150 contributers spread over 575 pull requests. There have been many improvements, highlights are: - Annotations of the main namespace are

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Code formatters

On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 4:28 PM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote: > > > On 15 Nov 2021, at 8:23 am, Stefan van der Walt > wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, at 09:13, Charles R Harris wrote: > > The black formatter is much improved in its latest version and I think > good enou

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Code formatters

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 3:02 PM Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 14:28 -0700, Charles R Harris wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 4:28 PM Juan Nunez-Iglesias > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/jni/skan/blob/7

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Code formatters

On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:40 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 6:14 PM Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> This post is for discussing the automatic code formatters for C/C++/*.py >> that are

[Numpy-discussion] Code formatters

Hi All, This post is for discussing the automatic code formatters for C/C++/*.py that are now available. The current options, as I see them, are clang-format (C/C++) and black (*.py, *.pyi, etc). Neither is perfect to my eye, but I think they are good enough at this point and would reduce amount

[Numpy-discussion] Re: win32 wheels for Python 3.10

On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:49 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 2:36 PM Aivar Annamaa > wrote: > >> Has it been decided to stop publishing win32 wheels for Python 3.10? >> Numpy 1.21.4 currently misses win32 wheel for Python 3.10 on PyPI. Is this >> temporary? >> >> I'm

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22.x has been branched

Hi All, Just as the subject line says. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.21.4 release.

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.4. NumPy 1.21.4 is a maintenance release that fixes a few bugs discovered after 1.21.3. The most important fix here is for the NumPy header files to make them work for both x86_64 and M1 hardware when included

[Numpy-discussion] branching NumPy 1.22.x

Hi All, I am aiming to branch NumPy 1.22.x next weekend. If there are any PRs that you think need to be merged before the branch, please raise the issue. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an

[Numpy-discussion] Make the pickle default protocol 4.

Hi All, I'd like to propose making the NumPy default pickle protocol 4, the same as the Python 3.8 default. That would have the advantage of supporting large pickles. The current default protocol is 2, last the default in Python 2.7. Thoughts? Chuck

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22. 0rc2 Release

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.22.0rc1. NumPy 1.22.0rc1 is a big release featuring the work of 151 contributers spread over 589 pull requests. There have been many improvements, highlights are: - Annotations of the main namespace are

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Wrapping up Google Season of Docs 2021

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:19 AM Melissa Mendonça wrote: > Hello, folks! > > As of today, our participation in the Google Season of Docs program for > 2021 has ended. You can see the case study detailing the work done and some > key results in the following link: > > >

[Numpy-discussion] (no subject)

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.1. The NumPy 1.21.1 is a maintenance release that fixes bugs discovered after the 1.21.0 release. OpenBLAS has also been updated to v0.3.17 to deal with arm64 problems. The Python versions supported for this

[Numpy-discussion] MacPython travis funds have run out (again)

Hi All, Travis wheel build problems again. There is still a positive balance, but apparently it is insufficiently positive. Which is strange if ARM64 is free. Wheel builds have been failing since last weekend. Matti, could you ask for more credits? I'm thinking we really need to move off travis

[Numpy-discussion] Re: MacPython travis funds have run out (again)

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 6:04 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Travis wheel build problems again. There is still a positive balance, but > apparently it is insufficiently positive. Which is strange if ARM64 is > free. Wheel builds have been failing since last weekend. >

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22.3 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.22.3. NumPy 1.22.3 is a maintenance release that fixes bugs discovered after the 1.22.2 release. The most noticeable fixes may be those for DLPack. One that may cause some problems is disallowing strings as inputs

[Numpy-discussion] Re: np.bool_ vs Python bool behavior

On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 10:31 AM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 4:53 PM Jacob Reinhold > wrote: > >> A pain point I ran into a while ago was assuming that an np.ndarray with >> dtype=np.bool_ would act similarly to the Python built-i

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22.2 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.22.2. NumPy 1.22.2 fixes several bugs discovered after the 1.22.1 release. Notable fixes are: - Build related fixes for downstream projects and other platforms. - Various annotation fixes/additions. -

[Numpy-discussion] Re: ANN: SciPy 1.8.0

On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 5:35 PM Tyler Reddy wrote: > Hi all, > > On behalf of the SciPy development team, I'm pleased to announce the > release of SciPy 1.8.0. > > Yay! Congratulations on working through all the problems. Some releases are just troublesome. Chuck

[Numpy-discussion] Re: MacPython travis funds have run out (again)

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:21 AM Matti Picus wrote: > > On 14/1/22 10:51 am, Matti Picus wrote: > > > > On 14/1/22 3:04 am, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Travis wheel build problems again. There is still a positive balance, > >&g

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22.1 has been released.

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.22.1. NumPy 1.22.1 fixes several bugs discovered after the 1.22.0 release. Notable fixes are: - Fix for f2PY docstring problems (SciPy) - Fix for reduction type problems (AstroPy) - Fixes for various

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Fit 2D points to closed curve

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 11:28 AM Robert Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 1:15 PM wrote: > >> Hi, >> I use a CAD package called Rhino which lets users write python scripts >> that run in the cad environment. I have a closed curve that is a design >> surface border and I have a sparse data

[Numpy-discussion] Mac wheel builds for Python 3.8 have stopped working.

Hi All, This seems due to an environment change in azure-pipelines sometime after Jan 7. My guess is the Python version setting environment changed from 0.193 to 0.197. It can be fixed by using `MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.14`. Note that 10.9 has been unsupported since 2019 and 10.14 is the

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.21.6 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.21.6. NumPy 1.21.6 is a very small release that achieves two things: - Backs out the mistaken backport of C++ code into 1.21.5. - Provides a 32 bit Windows wheel for Python 3.10. The provision of the 32

[Numpy-discussion] Re: NEP 29 and the faster Python release cadence

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 3:06 PM Aaron Meurer wrote: > Was the faster CPython release cadence (PEP 602 > https://peps.python.org/pep-0602/) ever discussed in relation to NEP > 29 (https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0029-deprecation_policy.html)? > > NEP 29 currently says: > > "The current Python release

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Numpy 1.22.4 release date?

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:18 AM Maarten Ballintijn wrote: > > Greetings, > > We are trying to migrate a stack to python 3.10. It looks like > numpy-1.22.4 is going to be required to move to python 3.10 because of the > cython/debugging issue (https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/21008). > > Is

[Numpy-discussion] Re: NumPy 1.26.0rc1 released

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 4:53 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy > 1.26.0rc1. The NumPy 1.26.0 release is a continuation of the 1.25.x release > cycle with the addition of Python 3.12.0 support. Pyth

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.26.0rc1 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.26.0rc1. The NumPy 1.26.0 release is a continuation of the 1.25.x release cycle with the addition of Python 3.12.0 support. Python 3.12 dropped distutils, consequently supporting it required finding a replacement

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Curious performance different with np.unique on arrays of characters

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM Devulapalli, Raghuveer < raghuveer.devulapa...@intel.com> wrote: > What processor you are running this on? np.sort uses AVX-512 accelerated > sorting for np.int32, so just wondering if you that is the reason for this > difference. > > Raghuveer We also have

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.26.0 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.26.0. The NumPy 1.26.0 release is a continuation of the 1.25.x release cycle with the addition of Python 3.12.0 support. Python 3.12 dropped distutils, consequently supporting it required finding a replacement for

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Dealing with static local variables in Numpy

On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 11:11 AM Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 08:01 +, Nicolas Holzschuch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is my first post to this group; I'd like to start by expressing > > my appreciation for the amazing work in developing and maintaining > > Numpy. > > > > I

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.26.1 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.26.1. NumPy 1.26.1 is a maintenance release that fixes bugs and regressions discovered after the 1.26.0 release. In addition, it adds new functionality for detecting BLAS and LAPACK when building from source.

[Numpy-discussion] Re: welcome Andrew Nelson to the NumPy maintainers team

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:09 PM Andrew Nelson wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 at 18:39, Ralf Gommers wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> On behalf of the steering council, I am very happy to announce that >> Andrew is joining the Maintainers team. Andrew has been contributing to our >> CI setup in

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.26.0b1 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.26.0b1. The NumPy 1.26.0 release is a continuation of the 1.25.x release cycle with the addition of Python 3.12.0 support. Python 3.12 dropped distutils, consequently supporting it required finding a replacement

[Numpy-discussion] Cirrus testing

Hi All, This is a heads up that we have already exceeded our allotment of free time on Cirrus CI. They are giving us a pass this month, but next month they will start enforcing the limits. That will impact both our testing and our releases. We have taken steps to reduce our use of Cirrus, but it

[Numpy-discussion] Re: We've recevied a NumFOCUS SDG!

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:24 PM wrote: > Hello NumPy community, > > I am thrilled to announce that I have been awarded a NumFocus Small > Development Grant for my work on NumPy-Financial. This grant will enable me > to enhance compatibility with NumPy 2.0, attract new contributors, improve >

[Numpy-discussion] Re: New stable documentation

On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 5:38 AM Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 10:33 +0300, matti picus wrote: > > On Sat, 21 May 2022 at 08:46, Ralf Gommers > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 3:40 AM Charles R

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.22.4 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.22.4. NumPy 1.22.4 is a maintenance release that fixes bugs discovered after the 1.22.3 release. In addition, the wheels for this release are built using the recently released Cython 0.29.30, which should fix the

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.23.0rc2 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.23.0rc2. The NumPy 1.23.0 release continues the ongoing work to improve the handling and promotion of dtypes, increase the execution speed, clarify the documentation, and expire old deprecations. The highlights

[Numpy-discussion] Dropping the pdf documentation.

Hi All, This is a proposal to drop the generation of pdf documentation and only generate the html version. This is a one way change due to the difficulty maintaining/fixing the pdf versions. See minimal discussion here . Chuck

[Numpy-discussion] Re: Dropping the pdf documentation.

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 4:54 PM Rohit Goswami wrote: > Being very hard to read should not be reason enough to stop generating > them. In places with little to no internet connectivity often the PDF > documentation is invaluable. > > I personally use the PDF documentation both on my phone and

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.23.0rc1 released

Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.23.0rc1. The NumPy 1.23.0 release continues the ongoing work to improve the handling and promotion of dtypes, increase the execution speed, clarify the documentation, and expire old deprecations. The highlights

[Numpy-discussion] Maintenance/1.23.x is branched

Hi All, The 1.23.x maintenance branch has been made and main is now open for 1.24.0 development. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org

[Numpy-discussion] No PDF documentation

Hi All, There is a Makefile PR that, among other things, removes the generation of PDF files. This will require changes to the documentation files and I'm wondering exactly how we want to proceed with that. Note that the zipped html files are

<    1   2   3   4   5   >