Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2017: NumFocus will be an umbrella organization

On 01/18/2017 09:28 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi Max, On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Max Linke > wrote: Hi Organizations can start submitting applications for Google Summer of Code 2017 on January 19 (and the deadline is February 9)

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2017: NumFocus will be an umbrella organization

Hi Max, On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Max Linke wrote: > Hi > > Organizations can start submitting applications for Google Summer of Code > 2017 on January 19 (and the deadline is February 9) > > https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline?hl=en Thanks for

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2017: NumFocus will be an umbrella organization

Hi Organizations can start submitting applications for Google Summer of Code 2017 on January 19 (and the deadline is February 9) https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline?hl=en NumFOCUS will be applying again this year. If you want to work with us please let me know and if you

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

On Fr, 2016-03-04 at 21:20 +, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:02:52 +0100, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: > [clip] > > OK first version: > > https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-2016-project-ideas I kept > > some > > of the ideas from last year, but removed all potential mentors as >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:02:52 +0100, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: [clip] > OK first version: > https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-2016-project-ideas I kept some > of the ideas from last year, but removed all potential mentors as the > same people may not be available this year - please re-add

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> This is last year's page: >> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-2015-project-ideas >> >> Some ideas have been worked on, others are still relevant. Let's copy this >> page to -2016- and start editing it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > Apparetnly, NumFocus is applyign to be a GSoC Umbrella org as well: > > https://github.com/numfocus/gsoc > > Not sure why one might choose NumFocus vs PSF... > > No reason to choose, you can get students from both

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

Apparetnly, NumFocus is applyign to be a GSoC Umbrella org as well: https://github.com/numfocus/gsoc Not sure why one might choose NumFocus vs PSF... -Chris On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > [This is a complete tangent, and so I apologize in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

[This is a complete tangent, and so I apologize in advance.] We are considering applying to GSOC for Bokeh. However, I have zero experience with GSOC, but non-zero questions (e.g. go it alone, vs apply through PSF... I think?) If anyone with experience from the mentoring organization side of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > We might consider adding "improve duck typing for numpy arrays" >> > > care to elaborate on that one? > > I know it come up on here that it would be good to have some code in numpy > itself that made it easier to make

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > As you can see in the timeline: > > https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline > > We are now in the stage where mentoring organizations are getting their > act together. So the question now is -- are there

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > Thanks Ralf, > > Note that we have always done a combined numpy/scipy ideas page and >> submission. For really good students numpy may be the right challenge, but >> in general scipy is easier to get started on. >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

Thanks Ralf, Note that we have always done a combined numpy/scipy ideas page and > submission. For really good students numpy may be the right challenge, but > in general scipy is easier to get started on. > yup -- good idea. Is there a page ready to go, or do we need to get one up? (I don't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

> > We might consider adding "improve duck typing for numpy arrays" > care to elaborate on that one? I know it come up on here that it would be good to have some code in numpy itself that made it easier to make array-like objects (I.e. do indexing the same way) Is that what you mean? -CHB

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Chris Barker > wrote: > >> Thanks Ralf, >> >> Note that we have always done a combined numpy/scipy ideas page and >>> submission. For really good students

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > OK first version: > https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-2016-project-ideas > I kept some of the ideas from last year, but removed all potential mentors > as the same people may not be available this year - please

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

Is there a clean way of importing existing C code as a vectorized numpy func? Like, it would be awesome to use gdal in a vectorized way just with ctypes or something. Just something I've dreamed of that I thought I'd ask about in regards to the GSoC. Elliot On Feb 8, 2016 6:03 PM, "Chris

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

ANyone interested in Google Summer of Code this year? I think the real challenge is having folks with the time to really put into mentoring, but if folks want to do it -- numpy could really benefit. Maybe as a python.org sub-project? https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2016 Deadlines are

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

As you can see in the timeline: https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline We are now in the stage where mentoring organizations are getting their act together. So the question now is -- are there folks that want to mentor for numpy projects? It can be rewarding, but it's a pretty

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 accepted students for Scipy/Numpy

Hi all, Google has just announced which students got accepted for this year's GSoC. For Scipy these are: - Nikolay Mayorov, Improve nonlinear least squares minimization functionality in SciPy mentors: Chuck Evgeni - Abraham Escalante, SciPy: scipy.stats improvements mentor: Ralf (Evgeni is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephan, all, On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Stephan Hoyer sho...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: It's great to see that this year there are a lot

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, It's great to see that this year there are a lot of students interested in doing a GSoC project with Numpy or Scipy. So far five proposals have been submitted, and it looks like several more are being

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC projects

Hi Lulu, welcome! On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Lulu Li c...@alum.mit.edu wrote: My apology if I am posting to the wrong mailing list. I am interested in NumPy project ideas for Google Summer of Code 2015 as posted here https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-project-ideas. In particular,

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

Hi all, It's great to see that this year there are a lot of students interested in doing a GSoC project with Numpy or Scipy. So far five proposals have been submitted, and it looks like several more are being prepared now. I'd like to give you a bit of advice as well as an idea of what's going to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Stephan Hoyer sho...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: It's great to see that this year there are a lot of students interested in doing a GSoC project with Numpy or Scipy. So far five proposals have

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC students: please read

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: It's great to see that this year there are a lot of students interested in doing a GSoC project with Numpy or Scipy. So far five proposals have been submitted, and it looks like several more are being prepared now.

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC projects

My apology if I am posting to the wrong mailing list. I am interested in NumPy project ideas for Google Summer of Code 2015 as posted here https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-project-ideas. In particular, knowing C and Python, I am interested in porting parts of bumpy from C to Cython or

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

On Do, 2015-02-26 at 07:09 -0800, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: snip To add one of my own: the old iterator is still being used in many, many places throughout the numpy code base. Wouldn't it make sense to port those to the new one? In doing so, it would probably lead to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote: I am not able to mentor, but I have some ideas about easier projects. These may be too easy, too hard, or not even desirable so take them or leave them as you please. scipy: Implement a set of circular statistics functions

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

I am not able to mentor, but I have some ideas about easier projects. These may be too easy, too hard, or not even desirable so take them or leave them as you please. scipy: Implement a set of circular statistics functions comparable to those in R or MATLAB circular statistics toolbox. Either

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: 25.02.2015, 19:59, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti: 25.02.2015, 07:11, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: Not sure if this is a full GSoC but it would be good to get the benchmarks into the numpy repository, so we can start asking

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

25.02.2015, 19:59, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti: 25.02.2015, 07:11, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: Not sure if this is a full GSoC but it would be good to get the benchmarks into the numpy repository, so we can start asking people who submit optimizations to submit new benchmarks as part of the PR

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

On Feb 25, 2015 12:10 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: 25.02.2015, 19:59, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti: 25.02.2015, 07:11, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: Not sure if this is a full GSoC but it would be good

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, It's time to start preparing for this year's Google Summer of Code. There is actually one urgent thing to be done

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

On 02/24/2015 05:41 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com mailto:ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com mailto:ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: On 02/24/2015 05:41 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com mailto:ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

Not sure if this is a full GSoC but it would be good to get the benchmarks into the numpy repository, so we can start asking people who submit optimizations to submit new benchmarks as part of the PR (just like other changes require tests). On Feb 24, 2015 10:29 AM, Charles R Harris

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 - mentors ideas

Hi all, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, It's time to start preparing for this year's Google Summer of Code. There is actually one urgent thing to be done (before 19.00 UTC today), which is to get our ideas page in decent shape. It

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC'15 prep - ideas page

Hi all, It's time to start preparing for this year's Google Summer of Code. There is actually one urgent thing to be done (before 19.00 UTC today), which is to get our ideas page in decent shape. It doesn't have to be final, but there has to be enough on there for the organizers to judge it. This

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC - what's next

Hi all, Just a short update, now that the deadline for submitting GSoC proposals has passed. We received four proposals: 1. Leo Mao, Numpy: Vector Math Library Integration 2. Janani Padmanbhan, SciPy/NumPy- enhancements in scipy.special (hyp2f1, sph_harm) 3. Ankit Agrawal, SciPy : Discrete

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC - what's next

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, Just a short update, now that the deadline for submitting GSoC proposals has passed. We received four proposals: 1. Leo Mao, Numpy: Vector Math Library Integration 2. Janani Padmanbhan, SciPy/NumPy-

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

On 12.03.2014 17:52, Leo Mao wrote: Hi, The attachment is my draft of proposal. The project is vector math library integration. I think I need some feedback to make it solider. Any comment will be appreciated. Thanks in advance. hi, I finally had some time too properly look at your

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Because of the license problem, I think I will choose Yeppp as a default backend. And if time allows, maybe I can implement other bindings. (Vc library) Also I found that sleef library is in public domain. But it seems that it only provides fast math function, not vectorized math function. So I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:43 AM, alex argri...@ncsu.edu wrote: I think everyone who wants fast numpy linalg already connects to something like OpenBLAS or MKL. When these are not available, numpy uses its own lapack-lite which is way slower. I don't think you are going to beat OpenBLAS, so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Am 13.03.2014 um 18:35 schrieb Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com: Hi, Thanks a lot for your advice, Chuck. Following your advice, I have modified my draft of proposal. (attachment) I think it still needs more comments so that I can make it better. And I found that maybe I can also make some

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

On Friday, March 14, 2014, Gregor Thalhammer gregor.thalham...@gmail.com wrote: Am 13.03.2014 um 18:35 schrieb Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com javascript:; : Hi, Thanks a lot for your advice, Chuck. Following your advice, I have modified my draft of proposal. (attachment) I think it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Am 14.03.2014 um 11:00 schrieb Eric Moore e...@redtetrahedron.org: On Friday, March 14, 2014, Gregor Thalhammer gregor.thalham...@gmail.com wrote: Am 13.03.2014 um 18:35 schrieb Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com: Hi, Thanks a lot for your advice, Chuck. Following your advice, I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Just a comment, supporting a library that is bsd 3 clauses could help to higly reduce the compilation problem like what we have with blas. We could just include it in numpy/download it automatically or whatever to make the install trivial and then we could suppose all users have it. Deadling with

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Hi everyone, Thanks for your relies! I think Gregor's uvml package is really a good starting point for me. I think the actual choice of the library could be made a configurable option. Sounds like a good idea? If the implementations are very similar, maybe I can implement multiple libraries

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com wrote: Yeppp is bsd 3 clauses so I think Yeppp is really a good choice. Is there a list of licenses which can be added into numpy without pain? (how about LGPL3 ?) No, just BSD and its rough equivalents like the Expat license. --

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC application template available

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: Hi GSoC students, The PSF just made their application template for this year available: https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/ApplicationTemplate2014. There are a few things in there that are required (for one,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Hi, Thanks a lot for your advice, Chuck. Following your advice, I have modified my draft of proposal. (attachment) I think it still needs more comments so that I can make it better. And I found that maybe I can also make some functions related to linalg (like dot, svd or something else) faster

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com wrote: And I found that maybe I can also make some functions related to linalg (like dot, svd or something else) faster by integrating a proper library into numpy. I think everyone who wants fast numpy linalg already connects to

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Hi, The attachment is my draft of proposal. The project is vector math library integration. I think I need some feedback to make it solider. Any comment will be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, Leo Mao text/html; charset=US-ASCII; name="proposal.html": Unrecognized

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Hi Leo, Out of curiosity, which vector math libraries did you have in mind as likely candidates for inclusion? How are you planning on selecting the library to integrate? Cheers, Aron On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The attachment is my draft of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

Hi Aron, Previously mentioned by Julian, Yeppp may be a good candidate. As for selecting a good library, I will consider the performance and the API of the library. The integration of the library should improve the performance of numpy and also not make the source too complicated to maintain. And

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC project: draft of proposal

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Aron, Previously mentioned by Julian, Yeppp may be a good candidate. As for selecting a good library, I will consider the performance and the API of the library. The integration of the library should improve the

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC application template available

Hi GSoC students, The PSF just made their application template for this year available: https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/ApplicationTemplate2014. There are a few things in there that are required (for one, submit a patch to numpy or scipy if you haven't done so yet), and some good

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2014 NumPy

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: It's possible to come up with an interesting proposal in this area I think. An issue may be that the FFT code in numpy and scipy isn't very actively worked on at the moment, so finding a suitable mentor could be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2014 NumPy

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: It's possible to come up with an interesting proposal in this area I think. An issue may be that the FFT code in numpy and scipy isn't very actively

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC: ideas finding mentors

Hi students, There is quite a bit of interest in GSoC ideas for Scipy and Numpy, which is great to see. The official application period to submit proposals opens next week and closes on the 21st, which is in two weeks and a bit. So now is the time to start discussing draft proposals on the list.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC 2014 : Improve Numpy datetime functionality

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:42 AM, faisal anees mohammedfaisal.an...@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: I am Mohammed Faisal Anees , a Computer Science student at IIIT- Hyderabad. I was going though the ideas page and I found Improve Numpy datetime functionality really interesting , It's great to have

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC 2014 : Improve Numpy datetime functionality

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:42 AM, faisal anees mohammedfaisal.an...@students.iiit.ac.in wrote: I am Mohammed Faisal Anees , a Computer Science student at IIIT- Hyderabad. I was going though the ideas page and I found

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2014 NumPy

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Leo Mao lmao20...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Ray, Thanks for your suggestion! I just read the links you provided and I think I can implement it as long as I do further research on zoom fft algorithm. So I wonder if this can be a GSoC project? By itself that's not

[Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2014 NumPy

Hello, I'm a student studying electrical engineering. I am interested in contributing to NumPy and applying GSoC 2014. I have experience of python and C/C++ programming, and I have already seen https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-project-ideas. But on that page only the project Improve Numpy

[Numpy-discussion] GSOC 2014 : Improve Numpy datetime functionality

Hi , I am Mohammed Faisal Anees , a Computer Science student at IIIT- Hyderabad. I was going though the ideas page and I found Improve Numpy datetime functionality really interesting , and it suits my experience as I have a considerable(hopefully !!) amount of experience in C/C++, and Python .

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2014 NumPy

At 04:42 AM 3/1/2014, you wrote: Currently I am trying to come up with some ideas about enhancing NumPy. Hello Leo, How about you implement fft.zoom_fft() as a single function? (Not to be confused with chirp-Z) We might be able to lend some ideas, but I've never been satisfied with mine:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2014 NumPy

Hello Ray, Thanks for your suggestion! I just read the links you provided and I think I can implement it as long as I do further research on zoom fft algorithm. So I wonder if this can be a GSoC project? Maybe I should extend this idea or combine it with other ideas? BTW, just for curiosity, why

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Jennifer stone jenny.stone...@gmail.comwrote: https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2014 The link provided by Josef is yet to list SciPy/NumPy under it. Somebody

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

On So, 2014-02-23 at 10:30 +0100, Ralf Gommers wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Jennifer stone jenny.stone...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Sebastian Berg sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote: On So, 2014-02-23 at 10:30 +0100, Ralf Gommers wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Jennifer stone

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

23.02.2014 11:30, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: [clip] 1. fix up ideas page with scipy/numpy descriptions, idea difficulty levels and preferably some more ideas. Here's a start: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/wiki/GSoC-project-ideas ___ NumPy-Discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2014 The link provided by Josef is yet to list SciPy/NumPy under it. Somebody please contact Terri. That page acts as major guiding factor for Python-GSoC prospective students. Please have SciPy listed there. ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Jennifer stone jenny.stone...@gmail.comwrote: https://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode/2014 The link provided by Josef is yet to list SciPy/NumPy under it. Somebody please contact Terri. That page acts as major guiding factor for Python-GSoC prospective

[Numpy-discussion] GSOC

Thought I'd forward this to the lists in case we need to do something. Hi everyone, Just a friendly reminder that applications for mentoring organizations close in about 24 hours. Please get your applications in soon, we will not accept late applications for any reason! Thanks, Carol

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Thought I'd forward this to the lists in case we need to do something. Hi everyone, Just a friendly reminder that applications for mentoring organizations close in about 24 hours. Please get your

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Jennifer stone jenny.stone...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Thought I'd forward this to the lists in case we need to do something. Hi everyone, Just a friendly reminder that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 13.02.2014 20:59, josef.p...@gmail.com kirjoitti: [clip] I assume numpy/scipy will participate under the PSF umbrella. So this deadline is for the PSF. However, Terri, the organizer for the PSF, asked for links to Ideas pages to be able to show

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSOC

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 13.02.2014 20:59, josef.p...@gmail.com kirjoitti: [clip] I assume numpy/scipy will participate under the PSF umbrella. So this deadline is for the PSF. However, Terri, the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:47 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Charles R Harris

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

I hardly found, any thing to improve and correct.. not even typo in docs? Where we need to avoid the version checks? On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:47 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:30

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

I have created a new PR, have removed one irrelevant version check. https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3304/files On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Arink Verma arinkve...@iitrpr.ac.inwrote: I hardly found, any thing to improve and correct.. not even typo in docs? Where we need to avoid the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Arink Verma arinkve...@iitrpr.ac.inwrote: I have created a new PR, have removed one irrelevant version check. https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3304/files I made some remarks on the PR. The convention on numpy-discussion is bottom posting so you should do

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

Yes, we need to ensure that.. Code generator can be made, which can create code for table of registered dtype during build time itself. Also at present there lot of duplicate code that attempts to work around these slow paths, simplification of that code is also required. On Thu, May 2, 2013 at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Arink Verma arinkve...@iitrpr.ac.in wrote: Yes, we need to ensure that.. Code generator can be made, which can create code for table of registered dtype during build time itself. So dtypes can be registered at runtime as well. In an ideal world, 'native' numpy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

Updating table at runtime, seems a good option. But then we have maintain separate file for caching and storing. I will see, op2calltree.py http://vorpus.org/~njs/op2calltree.py and gperftools both. * Instead of making a giant table of everything that needs to be done to make stuff fast first,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Arink Verma arinkve...@iitrpr.ac.in wrote: Yes, we need to ensure that.. Code generator can be made, which can create code for table of registered dtype during build time itself. I'd

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

For the sake of completeness, I don't think I ever mentioned what I used to profile when I was working on speeding up the scalars. I used AQTime 7. It is commercial and only for Windows (as far as I know). It works great and it gave me fairly accurate timings and all sorts of visual

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com writes: [clip] * Did you notice this line on the requirements page? Having your first pull request merged before the GSoC application deadline (May 3) is required for your application to be accepted. Where is that last requirement? It seems out

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com writes: [clip] * Did you notice this line on the requirements page? Having your first pull request merged before the GSoC application deadline (May 3) is required for your

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com writes: [clip] * Did you notice this line on the requirements page? Having your first pull request

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com writes: [clip] *

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Pauli Virtanen

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ralf Gommers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC proposal -- Numpy SciPy

Oh wow, I just assumed that `dot` was a ufunc... However, it would still be useful to have ufuncs working well with the sparse package. I don't understand everything that is going on in https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_object.c But I assumed that I would be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC proposal -- Numpy SciPy

On 1 May 2013 20:12, Blake Griffith blake.a.griff...@gmail.com wrote: However, it would still be useful to have ufuncs working well with the sparse package. How are you planning to deal with ufunc(0) != 0? cos(sparse) is actually dense. ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

It is great that you are looking into this !! We are currently running on a fork of numpy because we really need these performance improvements . I noticed that, as suggested, you took from the pull request I posted a while ago for the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC proposal -- Numpy SciPy

There are several situations where that comes up (Like comparing two sparse matrices A == B) There is a SparseEfficiancyWarning that can be thrown, but the way this should be implemented still needs to be discussed. I will be writing a specification on how ufuncs and ndarrays are handled by the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Arink Verma arinkve...@iitrpr.ac.inwrote: Hi all! I have written my application[1] for *Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars[2]. *It would be a great help if you view it. Does it look achievable and deliverable according to the project.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC : Performance parity between numpy arrays and Python scalars

@Raul I will pull new version, and try to include that also. What is wrong with macros for inline function? Yes, time for ufunc is reduced to almost half, for lookup table, I am generating key from argument type and returning the appropriated value.[1] @Chuck Yes I did some profiling with

  1   2   >