26.04.2012 03:11, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
[clip]
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list.
Is that even possible?
Unidirectional forwarding is possible, for instance using Github's API,
https://github.com/pv/github-pull-request-fwd
Github itself doesn't
We're kind of drifting again here, but...
Remember when all this discussion happened on usenet? Perhaps we're in
yet another awkward transition period and soon all email list-type
discussions will be on Github, Bitbucket, StackOverflow (e.g. pandas),
etc.
There's advantages and disadvantages to
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:37 AM, srean srean.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On something else that was brought up: I do not consider myself
competent/prepared enough to take on development, but it is not the
case that I have _never_ felt the temptation. What I have found
intimidating and styming is
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
Perhaps a more formal development release system could help here.
IIUC, numpy pretty much has two things:
This is a good idea - not for development releases but for master. Building
nightly/weekly binaries would help more people try out new
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
Perhaps a more formal development release system could help here.
IIUC, numpy pretty much has two things:
This is a good idea - not for development releases but for
Patches languishing on Trac is a real problem. The issue here is not at all
about not wanting those patches,
Oh yes I am sure of that, in the past it had not been clear what more
is necessary to get them pulled in, or how to go about satisfying the
requirements. The document you mailed on the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit to a certain curiosity about your own
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:03:25AM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
Well, you have already appealed to the authority of greater experience, so
it's a bit late to declare disinterest in the subject ;) I mean, at this
point I really would like to see how big your FOSS is.
Chuck, I am not sure that
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
That is one of the reasons that the smaller
scikits attract people, they have more freedom to do what they want and
fewer people to answer to. Scipy also has some of that advantage because
there are a number of
I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
process of making a contribution needs to be easy. Widespread veto makes it
more difficult and instead of opening up the process, closes it down. There
is less freedom, not more. That is one of the reasons that the
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
process of making a contribution needs to be easy. Widespread veto makes it
more difficult and instead of opening up the process, closes it
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Compared to - say - Sympy?
Why do you think this is?
I don't know about SymPy. But in my view (and I'm just a typical user of
NumPy), numpy seems to be at the
On 4/25/2012 4:51 PM, Andreas H. wrote:
I would assume that most users see numpy
as infrastructure, they write their own code on top of it. As a normal
user of numpy, I wouldn't know where it would need improvement to suit
my needs because it already does all I need. (Okay, masked arrays are
I too have to agree with Andreas. I have been using Numpy for years in my
work, but am not versed in C so I don't even understand what numpy is doing
under the hood. I too would only be able to contribute to the code at the
python level, or as Andreas said, at improving SciPy packages and other
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Compared to - say - Sympy?
Why do you think this is?
I think it's mostly because it's infrastructure that is a means to an end. I
certainly wasn't
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Compared to - say - Sympy?
Why do you think this is?
I think it's mostly
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
tra...@continuum.iojavascript:;
wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
process of making a contribution needs to be easy.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
pretty boring.
The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
there are many
developers really interested in commenting on code and
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
pretty boring.
The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
On 4/25/12 8:11 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
pretty boring.
The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
there are many
developers really
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
[snip]
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list. Is
that even possible?
That is definitely possible and shouldn't be too hard to do, like
Jason said. But that can potentially cause
On 4/25/12 11:08 PM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphanttra...@continuum.io wrote:
[snip]
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list.Is
that even possible?
That is definitely possible and shouldn't be too hard to do, like
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Puneeth Chaganti puncha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
[snip]
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list. Is
that even possible?
That is definitely possible and
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list.
Is that even possible?
-Travis
This ha been a concern of mine for matplotlib as well. The closest I can
come is to set up an RSS feed, but all the
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.govwrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Right now we are trying to balance difficult things: stable releases
with experimental development.
Perhaps a more formal development
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a fork, and not to
the type we frequently make on GitHub, then I'm surprised that no
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a) All arrays should be implicitly masked, even if the mask isn't
initially allocated. The maskna keyword can then be removed, taking
with it the sense that there are two kinds of arrays.
From my lazy user perspective, having masked and
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a) All arrays should be implicitly masked, even if the mask isn't
initially allocated. The maskna keyword can then be removed, taking
with it the sense that
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a) All arrays should be implicitly masked, even if the mask isn't
initially allocated. The
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
If the idea of having two payloads is to avoid a maximum of skipna
friends extra keywords, I would like it much. My feeling with my small
experience with R is that I end up calling every function with a
different
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and so
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing.
Stéfan
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.zawrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and so
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and so
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing.
We seem to have a consensus regarding interest in the topic.
For the benefit of those of
Thanks for the reminder, Stefan and keeping us on track.
It is very helpful to those trying to sort through the messages to keep the
discussions to one subject per thread.
-Travis
On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing.
We seem to have a consensus
On Apr 24, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing.
We seem to have a consensus
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus?
This
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
But a right to veto doesn't automatically extend to everyone who happens to
have
an interest in a topic.
The time has long gone when we simply hacked on NumPy for our own
benefit; if you will, NumPy users are
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za javascript:;
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we adhere to these pretty well already, the problem is with the word
'everyone'. I grew up in Massachusetts where town meetings were a tradition.
At those meetings the townsfolk voted on the budget,
On Apr 24, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
But a right to veto doesn't automatically extend to everyone who happens to
have
an interest in a topic.
This is not my view, but it is Charles view
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za
wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Fernando
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit to a certain curiosity about your own involvement in FOSS projects,
and I know I'm not alone in this. Google shows several years of discussion
on Monotone, but I have no idea what your contributions were
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit to a certain curiosity about your own involvement in FOSS
projects,
and I know I'm not alone in this. Google shows several
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
Well, at least I think that an inquisitive query about someone's
background, phrased like that, can be very easily misread. I can only
speak for myself, but I
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
Well, at least I think that an inquisitive query about someone's
background,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
Well, at least I think that an inquisitive query about someone's
background,
On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:41 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Charles R Harris
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Turnover is a problem with open source, and no matter how much discussion
there is, if people aren't doing the work the whole thing sort of peters
out.
That's very true, and I hope that by building a friendly
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Fernando, I'm not checking credentials, I'm curious.
Well, at least I
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:02 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry that I missed this part of numpy history, I always had the
impression that numpy is run by a community led by Chuck and the young
guys, David, Pauli, Stefan, Pierre; and Robert on the mailing list .
(But I came late, and am
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:59:09PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
Travis, if you are playing the BDFL role, then just make the darn decision
and remove the code so we can get on with life. As it is you go back and
forth and that does none of us any good, you're a big guy and you're
rocking the
I've given several talks on the subject, but I don't think I've ever written a
blog-post about it. A reasonable history does exist in the beginning of
the Guide to NumPy which is still available for free at
http://www.tramy.us/numpybook.pdf
-Travis
On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:18 AM,
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word consensus
come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
dissolved itself in favor of governance directly by the consensus of
the people
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word consensus
come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Linux is Linus' private tree. Everything that goes in is his decision,
everything that stays out is his decision. Of course, he
Linux: Technically, everything you say is true. In practice, good luck
convincing Linus or a subsystem maintainer to accept your patch when
other people are raising substantive complaints. Here's an email I
googled up in a few moments, in which Linus yells at people for trying
to submit a
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Linux: Technically, everything you say is true. In practice, good luck
convincing Linus or a subsystem maintainer to accept your patch when
other people are raising substantive complaints. Here's an email I
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Right now we are trying to balance difficult things: stable releases with
experimental development.
Perhaps a more formal development release system could help here.
IIUC, numpy pretty much has two things: the latest
That is an excellent thought.
We could make the odd numbered releases experimental and the even-numbered as
stable.
That makes some sense.What do others think?
-Travis
On Apr 23, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
That is an excellent thought.
We could make the odd numbered releases experimental and the
even-numbered as stable.
That makes some sense.What do others think?
I'm starting to think that a fork might be the
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm starting to think that a fork might be the best solution to the present
problem.
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a fork, and not to
the type we frequently make on GitHub, then I'm surprised
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
That is an excellent thought.
We could make the odd numbered releases experimental and the even-numbered
as stable.
That makes some sense. What do others think?
I think the concern with that is manpower: it
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a fork, and not to
the type we frequently make on GitHub, then I'm surprised that no one
has objected already. What would a fork solve? To paraphrase the
regexp
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word consensus
come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
dissolved itself in favor of governance directly by the consensus of
the people active
Hi Nathaniel,
thanks for a solid writeup of this topic. I just want to add a note
from personal experience, regarding this specific point:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Usually disagreements are an indication that a
better solution is possible, even
84 matches
Mail list logo
