in trunk but not in branch?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Amit Jain <am...@apache.org> wrote:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.4
Chetan Mehrotra
I have started a new mail thread around "Usecases around Binary handling in
Oak" so as to first collect the kind of usecases we need to support. Once
we decide that we can discuss the possible solution.
So lets continue the discussion on that thread
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, May 17, 201
referred usecases then we implement them.
Let me know if more details are required. If required I can put it up on a
wiki page also.
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
http://markmail.org/thread/6mq4je75p64c5nyn#query:+page:1+mid:zv5dzsgmoegupd7l+state:results
k/jcr/Jcr.java#L190
Chetan Mehrotra
we can safely expose this file which would allow layers above to
avoid spooling the content again locally for processing. And with callback
boundary we can later do required cleanup
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
for
later use
Hopefully this should address some of the concerns raised in this thread.
Looking forward to feedback :)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 9.5.16 11:43 , Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
>
>> To highligh
suggest it people
implement there own BlobStore (may be by extending ours) and provide this
API there i.e. say which takes Blob id and provide the required details.
This way we "outsource" the problem. Would that be acceptable?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Michael Düri
e issue. So I am still not sure on the
attack vector which we are defending against.
Chetan Mehrotra
manage binary content along with its metadata
Chetan Mehrotra
original proposed approach in OAK-1963 was like that i.e. introduce
this access method on BlobStore which works on reference. But in that case
client code would need to deal with BlobStore API. In either case access to
actual binary storage data would be required
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, May 5, 2016 a
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Ian Boston <i...@tfd.co.uk> wrote:
> If the File or URL is writable, will writing to the location cause issues
> for Oak ?
>
Yes that would cause problem. Expectation here is that code using a direct
location needs to behave responsibly.
Chetan Mehrotra
it
at Oak level as Blob instance are currently not bound to any session. So
proposal is to place this in 'org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api' package
Kindly provide your feedback! Also any suggestion/guidance around how the
access control be implemented
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://www.ibm.com/developerwor
Missed sending nomination on earlier thread. If not late then one more
proposal
oak-segment-v2
This is somewhat similar to names used in Mongo mmapv1 and mmapv2.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> oak-segment
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Amit Jain <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.14
All checks ok
Chetan Mehrotra
In this case it anyway
does not matter much as remote call would have much more overhead.
Suggestion here was more to have a consistent way of doing such things
but not a hard requirement per se ...
Chetan Mehrotra
"));
final long start = PERFLOG.start();
Connection c = getDataSource().getConnection();
PERFLOG.end(start, 100, "Obtaining a new connection from {} ", ds);
---
This would also avoid the call to System.currentTimeMillis() if debug
log is not enabled
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Davide Giannella <dav...@apache.org> wrote:
> I can't really recall why and if we use this.
Its referred to in main README.md so as to allow a developer to always
enable running of integration test
Chetan Mehrotra
Cool stuff Tomek! This was something which was discussed in last
Oakathon so great to have a way to do resilience testing
programatically. Would give it a try
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Stefan Egli <stefane...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Tomek,
>
> Would also
can be switched but I am afraid that it would not work as
expected. In JackrabbitNodeState#createBlob determining the
contentIdentity involves determining the length. You can give
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.blob.LengthCachingDataStore a try
(See OAK-2882 for details)
Chetan Mehrotra
Container and have your code in the war access repository
instance
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-examples/webapp
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org> wrote:
> There's always another library ;-)
For utility stuff well almost !
Chetan Mehrotra
e.printStackTrace(pw);
> +return sw.toString();
> +} finally {
> +pw.close();
> +}
> }
> +
May be use com.google.common.base.Throwables#getStackTraceAsString
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Shouldn't we make this volatile?
Ack. Would do that
Chetan Mehrotra
To make use of FileDataStore you would need to configure a
SegmentNodeStore as MemoryNodeStore does not allow plugging in custom
BlobStore
Have a look at snippet [1] for a possible approach
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://gist.github.com/chetanmeh/6242d0a7fe421955d456
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:42
via the
tool. Later extracted text would not be added. The primary aim was to
speed up indexing time in migration.
Chetan Mehrotra
ing commons-csv 1.0 [1] while Oak uses
1.1 and CSVFormat.withIgnoreSurroundingSpaces is added in v1.1. We
tested it earlier with Tika 1.6. So you can try adding commons-csv jar
as the first one in the classpath
java -cp commons-csv-1.1.jar:tika-app-1.11.jar:oak-run-1.2.4.jar
Chetan Mehrotra
[1
cess. Therefore
> limiting the changes over there make things faster.
I mostly do partial commit i.e. only the modified page and it ha
worked well. Changing of left side menu is not a very frequent task
and for that I think doing full deploy of site is fine for now
Chetan Mehrotra
return whiteboard.get();
> +}
> +};
> +}
Just curious about use of above approach. Is it for keeping the
dependencies as non static or using final instance variable? If you
mark references as static then all those bind and unbind method would
not be required as by the time component is active the dependencies
would be set.
Chetan Mehrotra
gt;
> jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/value/BinaryImpl.java
I see some changes to Blob/BinaryImpl. Are those change related to
this issue? Most likely look like a noise but just wanted to confirm
Chetan Mehrotra
va:82)
Looks like commons-lang is not available in oak-jcr. Added it as a
test dependency to see if this gets resolved
Chetan Mehrotra
BesteffortTest)
===
It happens because `getDefinition(parent).isProtected()` has a side of
effect of triggering an exception. With above code change that call is not
made if 'pnImporter' is null and thus causes a change in behaviour. So
better to revert that change.
Chetan Mehrotra
it got lost.
Chetan Mehrotra
Hi Marc,
Thanks for reporting this. It looks like a regression due to changes
done for OAK-3477 (affect 1.3.11). Opened OAK-3802 for that.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Marc Pfaff <pfa...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Using oak-1.3.11.r1716789, I have a situati
TestCase.assertEquals(TestCase.java:269)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.FacetTest.testFacetRetrievalWithAnonymousUser(FacetTest.java:102)
Looks like most failures are in new Facet tests
@Tommaso - Can you have a look
Chetan Mehrotra
tor might have some race condition
involve
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/634/jdk=jdk1.8.0_11,label=Ubuntu,nsfixtures=SEGMENT_MK,profile=unittesting/console
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Davide Giannella <dav...@apache.org> wrote:
> Can any of you please file an issue and assign it to myself?
Done with OAK-3768
Chetan Mehrotra
irement
So how the encrypted key is created and managed is not a concern for
Oak logic. For Oak it just need a way to get plain text credential
given some opaque key data. Any method related to encrypting would not
be used by other part of Oak so need not be part of API which we
expose as extensio
is to be performed
(say some change which touch all indexes)
Thoughts?
Chetan Mehrotra
}
> +return sb.toString();
> +}
> +
May be use com.google.common.base.Strings#repeat?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Amit Jain <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.25
Chetan Mehrotra
ode is found. if not it goes for
sleep again. Such retry can be done for 'n' times before giving up
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/2.1/org/apache/jackrabbit/api/observation/JackrabbitEvent.html#isExternal()
a message queue) and then other cluster nodes reacts to that
then there is a chance that such a change would not have became
visible on that cluster node.
Currently there is no deterministic way other than introducing polling
as part of queue consumer logic
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015
ak to manage such thing on its own (@Stefan thoughts?).
But as of now this is not possible. So only way out currently is to
provide your own Whiteboard implementation which can handle such kind
of singleton scheduled jobs. Doing this is certainly non trivial!
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apach
> me that they should.
Checkpoint are not meant to prevent contention. AsyncIndexer has an
inbuilt "lease" support to prevent concurrent runs but there have been
some issues like OAK-3436 which can result in complete reindexing at
times! They should be addressed soon
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
Does the above setup involves multiple Oak instances (say in separate
JVM) or message producer and consumer of queue are use same Oak
instance?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:33 PM, <da...@butterdev.com> wrote:
> I am using Oak with a DocumentNodeStore. I am storin
wider demand for such a usecase then it can be
looked into
Chetan Mehrotra
Hi Jim,
How does the indexing performs if you say just run a single webapp node?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Jim.Tully <jim.tu...@target.com> wrote:
> We are using Oak embedded in a web application, and are now experiencing
> significant delays in async in
The failure was in the execution of test in new oak-standalone module
as some of the dependencies are only compatible with JDK 7. Skipped
execution of test with 1717897
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote:
> The Apach
not be affected and aware
of multiplexing logic. May be I am missing something here?
Chetan Mehrotra
failure the above is a new one.
Opened OAK-3719 for that
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Rino van Wijngaarden
<rino.van.wijngaar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But this gives problems in osgi, so how do i do this with oak?
What is the problem and how are you running Oak. Is it via Sling?
Chetan Mehrotra
cumentNodeStore the multiplexing breaks down.
> Code that reads and writes to /jcr:system/** does this.
Can you provide a testcase on Robert's branch illustrating the
problem? That would help to understand the problem you are facing
better
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Ian Boston &l
rlap so
keep that usecase also in mind
Chetan Mehrotra
try would be fetched
from cache itself. Now with above change the cache actually gets
invalidated and hence the issue surfaces. So may be a real issue
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get consistent test failures
id using File based approach.
This would reduce operational complexity
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Stefan Egli <stefane...@apache.org> wrote:
> Right, I'm not sure it is indeed a requirement. But without automatic
> support it might get forgotten and thus th
c failover support.
For such cases we can allow passing the id as a system/framework property also
Chetan Mehrotra
Removed the method with 1716101
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 24.11.15 10:09 , Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org> wrote:
>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Marcel Reutegger <mreut...@adobe.com> wrote:
> I quickly checked JIRA and it seems we can also 'unrelease'
> a version if needed.
>
> What do others think? Should we changed the release process [0]
> accordingly?
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Francesco Mari
<mari.france...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven32/3.2.5/libexec
> Java version: 1.8.0_65, vendor: Oracle Corporation
I am on JDK 1.7.0_55 and there it passes. Would try it on JDK 8
Chetan Mehrotra
Looks like on JDK 8 the MBean interface has to be public for MBean
registration to work. Done that with 1716110
@Francesco - Can you try again with updated trunk?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
<chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 201
/metric/StatisticsProviderFactory.java:[59,54]
error: illegal forward reference
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Travis CI <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
> Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
> -
>
> Build: #6910
> Status: Broken
>
. By default only TimeSeries based
data would be collected.
Kindly have a look at OAK-3654 and provide your inputs there!
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://metrics.dropwizard.io/
[2] http://metrics.dropwizard.io/3.1.0/getting-started/
Have a look at webapp example [1] for suggested setup. The repository
should be created once and then reused.
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-examples/webapp
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:02 AM, David Marginian
<da...@davidmarginian.com> wrote:
&
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.24
Chetan Mehrotra
Was this change done? I just ran the check-release script for 1.2.8
and it did not executed any test
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Davide Giannella <dav...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 11:08, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
>> ...
>> I would like to rever
Looks like running check-release.sh for 1.2.8 build (or 1.2 branch)
is not triggering testcase. It looks like Marcel raised this earlier
also at [1]. Would followup there
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/f5uvng2b2yvqu7ix
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Julian Reschke
80)
Probably these are intermittent failures.
However bit unsure for B) - As there exception comes just in the
OakInitializer.initialize call which should be single threaded. So not
sure why there was a conflict
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://paste.apache.org/ngsL
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Chetan Mehr
Hi Davide,
I am working on OAK-3092 and hope to get it done by today. So can the
release be delayed a bit to include this change?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Davide Giannella <dav...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I'm planning to cut Oak 1.3.10 next Mon
for consumption
by oak-lucene
Chetan Mehrotra
not be aware of drivers etc. So we can get rid of
that
@Julian - Thoughts?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/7f844d5cde52dc53c41cc01aad9079afb275438a
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Francesco Mari
<mari.france...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A friendly
> }
I am fine with removing dependency on Guava from API but not sure if
we should remove it from implementation side
Also it would be good to have a testcase to validate the above logic
if we are removing dependency from a tested Guava utility method
Chetan Mehrotra
started otherwise it would trigger large traversal if no index was
present or previous revision of index is not usable (due to some
corruption)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Mueller <muel...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If an index provider is (temporarily) n
rue(Assert.java:43)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNull(Assert.java:551)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNull(Assert.java:562)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.CompactionMapTest.removeSome(CompactionMapTest.java:156)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
==
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Thomas Mueller <muel...@adobe.com> wrote:
> what about getIndexCostInfo
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
g? May be we should name it better
Chetan Mehrotra
Hi Marcel,
A short description of what was the fix would be very helpful for
future reference!
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:00 PM, <mreut...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: mreutegg
> Date: Tue Sep 22 15:30:08 2015
> New Revision: 1704655
>
> URL: http://svn.
Opened OAK-3412 to track this issue.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2015-09-15 10:03, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
>>
>> If I change the code in Namespace#isValidLocalName to use
>> Character#isWhitespac
?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
<chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Micheal Durig mentioned that this has been discussed earlier. So
> going back in time this was discussed in OAK-1891 and thread [1]. Oak
> used to prevent such nodes from getting
(see Namespace#isValidLocalName).
However when that change was done the check initially used
Character#isWhitespace and switched to using Character#isSpaceChar
which is limited to very few checks. Now looks like isSpaceChar is
returning false for '\n', '\r' etc not sure why.
Chetan Mehrotra
[0
cause problem other. Specially when JR2 does not allow creation
of such node names [1]
So the question is
Should Oak allow node names with non space whitespace chars like \t, \r etc
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit/blob/trunk/jackrabbit-spi-commons/src/main/java/org/apache
How did you performed the test? If you tested out with explain then
current code in 1.0/1.2 return misleading result and this got fixed in
trunk with OAK-2943. Technically Oak would convert the OR clause to a
union query and then each part of union should then be able to make
use of index.
Chetan
IndexDefinition#createAnalyzer which already creates a
PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper. So would be better to move this logic there.
Or you want to customize the analyzer for that field only during
indexing.
Chetan Mehrotra
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Davide Giannella <dav...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> some of us noticed we lack the epics in our jira so I raised an issue
> asking whether that would be possible to have them.
>
> https://issues.apache.org
Welcome Francesco!
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Please welcome Francesco as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache
Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to offer Francesco
committership based on his
can think of some offheap solution. You
can also look into using MVStore which is being used in
DocumentNodeStore for persistent cache.
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2882?focusedCommentId=14550198page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel
the created repo. Fixed
that now with rev http://svn.apache.org/r1696522. Hopefully this
should fix the issue!
Chetan Mehrotra
is not on svn but git as the git
mirrors might lag behind!
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/63c4a4db95b0f39f9ab27f499416c99c918a4955
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache
in non OSGi env
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/construct.html
[2] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-pojosr
[3] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-examples/webapp
[4] https://github.com/Clay-Ferguson/meta64
[5] https://github.com
)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.assertFailed(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:646)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.run.osgi.MBeanIntegrationTest.jmxIntegration(MBeanIntegrationTest.groovy:47)
--
Chetan Mehrotra
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
The Apache Jenkins build
the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
[ERROR]
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command
[ERROR] mvn goals -rf :oak-blob-cloud
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Apache
Now the compile passes but 55 test fail. Majority of them from Solr.
Opened OAK-3215 to track that
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build
#325
Looks like some issue with my recent work. Would have a look.
Thanks for filing the issue and marking current one as ignored!
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Angela Schreiber anch...@adobe.com wrote:
hi
i get the following failures in oak-pojosr. is it only me?
anybody
. So should the final location be oak/oak-example/webapp ?
I can then move the current copy to that place. I have some local
commit now in my git-svn. Once I am done I would commit then to
current place and then move them to final place.
Would that be OK?
Chetan Mehrotra
. Then go to oak-doc/target/scmpublish-checkout
4. and directly commit the changed html files via svn commit
This is also documented under oak-doc/README.md [1] and has proved to
be a faster approach for me compared to building and deploying the
whole site
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://github.com
and that to with most basic setup.
I would like to modify this module to use oak-pojorsr [2] to configure
complete Oak stack as we do it in Sling. For that I would like to copy
this module to oak under oak-webapp and then refactor it to run
complete Oak stack.
Thoughts?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https
configures the webdav servlet and JCR Remoting which work with any
repository implementation and thus should work with Oak.
Chetan Mehrotra
Hi Davide,
It would be helpful if while moving the bugs to next version we do not
add any comment like 'Bulk Move to xxx'. This would reduce the
unnecessary noise in bug comment history.
Recently this was discussed on DL at [1]
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/2jvphlkdw4eqaxdh
!
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.CommitFailedException: OakLucene0003: Failed
to index the node /test
Thats a known issue on Windows OAK-3072. Not a blocker for this release
Chetan Mehrotra
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Amit Jain am...@apache.org wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18 release is available
201 - 300 of 653 matches
Mail list logo
