Re: [OctDev] low level I/O (GPIB, USBTMC, VXI11)

2012-11-25 Thread c.
On 25 Nov 2012, at 16:43, Richard wrote: > Really? so i can have a C++ class, and call it and its methods from an m-file > in Octave, and have it persist like a real C++ object from one call of its > methods to the next? Actually I was referring to using the class from an .oct file

Re: [OctDev] low level I/O (GPIB, USBTMC, VXI11)

2012-11-25 Thread c.
On 25 Nov 2012, at 12:49, Richard wrote: > I suspect he wants to do something like this: > > http://www.mathworks.co.uk/matlabcentral/fileexchange/38964-example-matlab-class-wrapper-for-a-c++-class > http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/278243 > >

Re: [OctDev] low level I/O (GPIB, USBTMC, VXI11)

2012-11-25 Thread c.
On 25 Nov 2012, at 10:21, Stefan Mahr wrote: > The instrument control package at octave forge creates a class as kind of > file descriptor. While there are methods to access read, write, etc. from C++ > / oct-File, there are no methods when using from octave. > > I know that

Re: [OctDev] low level I/O (GPIB, USBTMC, VXI11)

2012-11-23 Thread c.
instrument-control If you see room for improving either of the two packages maybe you'd like to work on merging the two? c. -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Ge

Re: [OctDev] Octconf 2013

2012-11-22 Thread c.
On 22 Nov 2012, at 21:11, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > Do you have a defined date? > > Regards, > Júlio. OctConf 2012 was July 16-20 I'd say around that time (2 weeks before or after at most) would be a good choice to not interfere with spring semester and su

[OctDev] access to web SVN

2012-11-11 Thread c.
I can't access the SVN web interface at the moment, anyone else having the same problem? c. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free

Re: [OctDev] Octave-maintainers Digest, Vol 80, Issue 15

2012-11-08 Thread c.
ur interface code here: https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/feature-requests so we can have a look and comment on it. c. P.S. there is a student here at Politecnico di Milano working on an implementation of the ILU preconditioner who might be interested in helping out. ---

Re: [OctDev] Function ILU

2012-11-04 Thread c.
On 4 Nov 2012, at 23:58, marco atzeri wrote: > On 11/4/2012 11:48 PM, Giovanni Matteo Fumarola wrote: >> Dear all, >> I'm Giovanni Matteo Fumarola, a italian student of Computer Science of >> Politecnico di Milano. >> For a university project, I want to realize a ILU function, this is >> missing

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-27 Thread c.
ctave you will be able to deactivate the > warnings locally to each function. I know, I am working with the development version, but I was not sure it would work with the 3.6 release c. -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millio

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-27 Thread c.
t; Rafael Yes, they are. c. -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-a

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-25 Thread c.
tructured_mesh: REGION must be a valid scalar. > > > Rafael Rafael, I posted a new version of bim here: https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/package-releases/9/#5b7d testing is welcome as usual c. -- Everyone hates s

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-23 Thread c.
On 23 Oct 2012, at 20:34, c. wrote: > I just uploaded a new version of the package in the release forum, could you > please check if the problem is solved there? this is a direct link: https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/package-releases/9/attachment/msh-1.0.5.tar

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-23 Thread c.
On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:27, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * c. [2012-10-22 12:21]: > >> New versions of the Forge packages bim (1.1.0) and msh (1.0.5) have been >> uploaded to the package release forum, and will soon be available for >> download from Octave-Forge. >&

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-22 Thread c.
and all snippets were lost :( Sorry for that, Agora is starting to look good but it is still work in progress. I commented out that line on the wiki page for the moment. c. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.

[OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-22 Thread c.
Hi all, New versions of the Forge packages bim (1.1.0) and msh (1.0.5) have been uploaded to the package release forum, and will soon be available for download from Octave-Forge. BIM provides functions to solve Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Partial Differential Equations in 1, 2 and 3 spatial

Re: [OctDev] Implementation of importdata belonging to Octave Core or Octave-Forge?

2012-10-21 Thread c.
.net/p/octave/code/11324/tree/trunk/octave-forge/extra/bim/inst/bim3a_osc_advection_diffusion.m has an example of creating a temporary file to work with in a demo. HTH, c. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do

Re: [OctDev] Hi all, and a first question about graycomatrix

2012-10-20 Thread c.
ctions to run them just type: demo function_name at the Octave prompt. HTH, c. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http:/

Re: [OctDev] no more combinatorics and physical-constants package

2012-10-17 Thread c.
), only the last on the list would be used. If you commit a > change, do it on the python script that generates the whole function > file. > > Carnë OK, I'll try to do so. c. -- Everyone hates slow websit

Re: [OctDev] no more combinatorics and physical-constants package

2012-10-17 Thread c.
nice if this change was mentioned somewhere, for example in the "news". c. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite

Re: [OctDev] Broken link on OF website

2012-10-12 Thread c.
of the package too. > > Carnë It might be just a problem with my browsers cache, but in package help files I still get the old link, see for example: http://octave.sourceforge.net/bim/function/bim1a_advection_diffusion.html what happens if

Re: [OctDev] geometry 1.6.0 released

2012-10-12 Thread c.
intEdge(point, edges); Is it too late to include this in the release? > BTW, several figures are missing in the documentation because they > can't be created with gnuplot. Currently only fltk plots them, but the > output of ftlk is not added to the gener

[OctDev] Broken link on OF website

2012-10-12 Thread c.
- a new release of generate_html is made - all packages a released anew - html files are generated for each package with the latest version of generate_html This sounds like a task for a code-sprint, should we add it to the pkg.m code-sprint? c. Index: get_html

Re: [OctDev] Test failures due to tolerance in fftfilt.m

2012-10-10 Thread c.
between X and the next largest value" c. -- Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby,

Re: [OctDev] [very important -- all developers] reclone Octave-Forge

2012-09-24 Thread c.
On 24 Sep 2012, at 10:44, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:21 AM, c. wrote: >> >> On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:58, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: >> >>> Which if itself is not a bad idea! releasePKG is working fine, we can >>> make a scri

Re: [OctDev] [very important -- all developers] reclone Octave-Forge

2012-09-24 Thread c.
e beginning, proved to be __BAD__™ in the end. Been there already, we don't want to go there again. c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and

Re: [OctDev] Improving pkg.m

2012-09-24 Thread c.
has many .cc files that can all be compiled independently. c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT manage

Re: [OctDev] [very important -- all developers] reclone Octave-Forge

2012-09-24 Thread c.
togenerated files for package documentation have hardcoded links to various pages on the Octave-Forge website, if you start moving things around those links will be broken and ALL packages will have to be generated again. c. ---

Re: [OctDev] Improving pkg.m

2012-09-23 Thread c.
/Projects#Packaging a bit more specific before the sprint. c. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;

Re: [OctDev] [very important -- all developers] reclone Octave-Forge

2012-09-23 Thread c.
> Is anonymous checkput still possible? c. -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?

Re: [OctDev] My patches for octaveforge pkgs Mingw build

2012-09-16 Thread c.
rname "/../" dirlist{ii}]) > - else > +% rmpath ( [ dirname "/../" dirlist{ii}]) > +rmpath ( fullfile(basename,dirlist{ii})) > + else > ## Run this if we are testing the package without installation > -rmpath ([ dirname "/inst/" dirl

Re: [OctDev] On the union of two communities - The GNU Octave atmosphere

2012-09-15 Thread c.
you think the functionality of some package is of general interest to all Octave users, and there is an implementation that meets Octaves quality standards then you might just want to propose to add that functionality directly i

Re: [OctDev] On the union of two communities - The GNU Octave atmosphere

2012-09-15 Thread c.
ctives. This latter part will probably be named "the Forge" or something similar and sounds to me like it is very similar to what you are asking for. Suggestions regarding which packages should be part of the Forge have been collected on this list s

Re: [OctDev] problems uploading package

2012-09-15 Thread c.
o files <= 256000 bytes, it > still does not accept a single chunk and pretends the file is > 256K. yes this is a very strict limitation. For the time being, as long as we can't find anything better, if the file is too big just upload the pack

Re: [OctDev] On the union of two communities - The GNU Octave atmosphere

2012-09-15 Thread c.
On 15 Sep 2012, at 10:52, Philip Nienhuis wrote: > Daniel J Sebald wrote: >> On 09/14/2012 06:53 PM, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> There are three, maybe four levels of Octave code: >>> >>> 1) Core Octave written

Re: [OctDev] signed distance of point from polygon

2012-09-11 Thread c.
On 11 Sep 2012, at 10:12, JuanPi wrote: > Please go ahead!. Can you leave the original code commented at the end > of the function? If you can't do not worry. > Thank you! OK, I committed the new version and left the old one a

Re: [OctDev] signed distance of point from polygon

2012-09-10 Thread c .
On 10 Sep 2012, at 13:20, JuanPi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, c. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need to compute the "signed distance" of a point P from a polygon Q, >> i.e., the distance of P from the polyline including Q with a "+" sign if &g

Re: [OctDev] signed distance of point from polygon

2012-09-10 Thread c.
On 10 Sep 2012, at 13:20, JuanPi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, c. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I need to compute the "signed distance" of a point P from a polygon Q, >> i.e., the distance of P from the polyline including Q with a "+" sign if &g

Re: [OctDev] signed distance of point from polygon

2012-09-10 Thread c.
On 10 Sep 2012, at 13:01, c. wrote: > Hi, > > I need to compute the "signed distance" of a point P from a polygon Q, > i.e., the distance of P from the polyline including Q with a "+" sign if > the point is inside the polygon and a "-" sign if it is

[OctDev] signed distance of point from polygon

2012-09-10 Thread c.
ometry package computes the distance but always returns a positive number. Is there already a function to do what I need? If not, any idea where I can look-up the algorithm to modify "distancePointPolygon" according to my needs? Thanks, c. --

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-07 Thread c.
patch you committed, I'll confirm > a little bit later. thanks! c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-07 Thread c.
lts = octave_value (-1); } - - return results; - - /* [ stat info ] = MPI_Probe (src, tag, comm) */ } + return results; } could you please check if this works for you? Thanks! c. -- Live Secur

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-07 Thread c.
r. It seems your patch went by unnoticed, where have you sent the patch? Is it still available somewhere? could you please send a link to it? Thanks, c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will c

Re: [OctDev] Ode23s

2012-09-06 Thread c.
On 6 Sep 2012, at 09:13, c. wrote: > > On 5 Sep 2012, at 23:31, davide prandi wrote: > >> Well, it works. Thanks to everyone! I'll load it on sourceforge as soon as >> possible, if someone wants to check/test it I'll be happy. >> Regards, >> >>

Re: [OctDev] Ode23s

2012-09-06 Thread c.
e and it should start with "%% Copyright (C)", Octave looks for this string to understand that it is a copyright notice and not part of the help text. - If you have no special reason for doing otherwise I'd reccomend using GPL "version 3 or later" as the license

Re: [OctDev] Wrong permissions in secs1d tarball

2012-09-03 Thread c.
On 3 Sep 2012, at 22:12, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Thomas Weber [2012-09-03 20:04]: > >> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 09:39:03PM +0200, c. wrote: >>> I changed the permissions locally and tried to commit the changes but it >>> seems nothing happened. >>&g

Re: [OctDev] Wrong permissions in secs1d tarball

2012-09-03 Thread c.
e tarball are 644 after unpacking, which seems > appropriate. In my local copy some of the files listed by Raphael had mode 640, is this not the case in the tarball? > Thomas c. -- Live Security Virtual Conferen

Re: [OctDev] Wrong permissions in secs1d tarball

2012-09-02 Thread c.
On 2 Sep 2012, at 20:38, Thomas Weber wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 08:08:16PM +0200, c. wrote: >> >> On 2 Sep 2012, at 17:03, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> >>> The following files have wrong permissions in the 0.0.9 tarball of >>> secs1d: >>&g

Re: [OctDev] Wrong permissions in secs1d tarball

2012-09-02 Thread c.
this in the next release. > > Thanks, > > Rafael thanks, I fixed the permissions in my local copy. As that is where I make the release from I think the next release will have correct permissions. c. -- Live S

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-31 Thread c.
include openmpi_ext > 1.0.2, since I recently added it into Debian. Is there still time to update openmpi_ext in debian so that the next ubuntu release will include the current version rather than the 3-years old 1.0.2? Is there something that can be done upstrea

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-30 Thread c.
d openmpi_ext to test whether it works correctly, set the environment variables NUMBER_OF_MPI_NODES and HOSTFILE before running Octave and then do: pkg load openmpi_ext demo helloworld Thanks again for your feedback. HTH, c.

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-30 Thread c.
lease to get newer binaries for Ubuntu you could just use one of the links listed here: http://wiki.octave.org/Octave_for_GNU/Linux#Unofficial_binaries > Best regards, > Sukanta c. -- Live Security Virtual

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-29 Thread c.
On 29 Aug 2012, at 21:50, Sukanta Basu wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sukanta Basu wrote: >> Thanks! >> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:30 PM, c. wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> A new release of openmpi_ext has just been uploaded t

[OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-29 Thread c.
Hi, A new release of openmpi_ext has just been uploaded to the release tracker. This release is mainly a maintainance release to clean-up code and documentation and fix a few small bugs. c. -- Live Security Virtual

Re: [OctDev] Cann't make openmpi_ext working on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

2012-08-28 Thread c.
hat on Ubuntu: http://wiki.octave.org/Octave_for_GNU/Linux#Ubuntu c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers

Re: [OctDev] Cann't make openmpi_ext working on Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64

2012-08-28 Thread c.
"pkg install -verbose openmpi_ext.tar.gz" from within Octave to install the package. I'd be very interested, if you can still see the problem, to use your help in order to fix it. Please remember to uninstall any previous versions you already have installed b

Re: [OctDev] New Joinee

2012-08-26 Thread c.
ter/Contributing-Guidelines.html#Contributing-Guidelines> Octave contributing guidelines (from the manual) <http://wiki.octave.org/FAQ#How_can_I_get_involved_in_Octave_development.3F> "How can I get involved in Octave development?" in Octave's wiki FAQs <http://jordi.inverset

Re: [OctDev] Octave cookbook

2012-08-22 Thread c.
module bar". > > Carnë Great idea! I tried to add an entry, but it seems the wiki is having problems at interpreting math formulas at the moment? Any idea how to fix this? c. -- Live Security Virtual Conferen

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-08-21 Thread c.
On 21 Aug 2012, at 05:01, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 14 August 2012 17:40, c. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seems from a few recent posts on the list that openmpi_ext is getting some >> attention lately, so I decided to have a look at its current status. >> >>

Re: [OctDev] [Agora] Single, Bundle, Forge

2012-08-19 Thread c.
ut it might be a problem as that word has a different meaning in Matlab: http://www.mathworks.it/help/techdoc/matlab_oop/brfynt_-1.html and the same feature is soon to be available in Octave so it might be confusing to use the same term for different things. What about following Matl

Re: [OctDev] Current MPI-2 support in Octave?

2012-08-13 Thread c.
ns, that aren't tied > directly with OpenMPI (say if I want to use MPICH2)? > > -- > Dmitry S. Kravtsov I just had a look at the openmpi_ext, the code looks quite simple and I don't think there is much to be modified there to make it work with mpich ... c. --

Re: [OctDev] Fem PLotting: fpl 1.3.0 released

2012-08-09 Thread c.
uld be easily recovered by substituting "out.resize1" by "out.resize ( ... )" but I don't think it makes much sense to spend any work to support releases older than 3.4, so I'll just update the "depends:" field in "DESCRIPTION" to specify 3.4 is ne

Re: [OctDev] Fem PLotting: fpl 1.3.0 released

2012-08-09 Thread c .
orrectly for me on 3.2.4. c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will

Re: [OctDev] package compiling

2012-08-05 Thread c.
hat there is a problem > with c program. Error is included below. > > Some information would be helpful. > > Regards, > Jocker > > % > pkg install optim-1.0.6.tar.gz > warning: function /home/aurevc/octave/optim-1.0.6/fminbnd.m shadows a core > library function

[OctDev] trackers and mailing list (Re: NURBS toolbox extension)

2012-08-01 Thread c.
ant to reproducing the bug, so developers can fix the problem. If you have a fix for the problem yourself, please send it along with your message." If the preferred way to send bug reports / patches is through the forums I think this text should be changed or at least removed. c. P.S.

Re: [OctDev] Fwd: Ranking SOCIS student applications

2012-07-27 Thread c.
Il giorno 27/lug/2012, alle ore 18.11, Juan Pablo Carbajal ha scritto: > Ok, we can start. > http://wiki.octave.org/ESA_Summer_of_Code_in_Space Where should comments go? c. -- Live Security Virtual Conf

Re: [OctDev] Compatability and an engineer's perspective

2012-07-18 Thread c.
ken, so if Jonathan wants to have a look at it so that it becomes usable for at least himself, that would still be nice. > Carnë c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today&#

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

2012-06-25 Thread c.
to keep backward compatibility without checking for version numbers. Before I spend time on this, why not just tell users of old versions of Octave to use a prior version of the package and instruct those who want the latest version to update to a newer Octave? c. P.S. I think there might be a

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

2012-06-24 Thread c.
u explain why the different definition is needed depending on the version number? c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed a

Re: [OctDev] Problem with octave-3.6.1-vs2010

2012-06-22 Thread c.
On 22 Jun 2012, at 18:43, dragan mladenovic wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to use octave from Visuall C++ (I'm writing Octave to .NET > wrapper). I'm new to c++ so please bear with me. My problem can be fount at > http://stackoverflow.com/question

Re: [OctDev] vrml-1.0.13 released

2012-06-17 Thread c.
> generate_html; generate_package_html ('package', 'package-html', > 'octave-forge')" > > ? Would this have worked? (no errors here) > > Hth, > > Etienne I applied the change you suggested: http://octave.sourceforge.net/developers.html

Re: [OctDev] vrml-1.0.13 released

2012-06-17 Thread c.
e time for sourceforge to propagate files to all mirrors, if your mirror does not show the latest version yet, you can switch to a different mirror or just wait until all servers are updated. > Rafael c. -- Live Securit

Re: [OctDev] vrml-1.0.13 released

2012-06-17 Thread c.
tp://octave.sourceforge.net/developers.html and here: http://octave.sourceforge.net/generate_html/function/generate_package_html.html but if you have any suggestion on how to improve this documentation, I'll be glad to apply any patc

Re: [OctDev] vrml-1.0.13 released

2012-06-17 Thread c.
the new version of the package on your own system, could you please fix this and post to the forum again? thank you very much! c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways

Re: [OctDev] bug with optim-1.1.0.tar.gz and mac os 10.7.4

2012-06-06 Thread c.
ntainers list. > > If you go this way, the problem is deeper than just -framework. It's > not an easy problem to deal with, because I would like to also accept > *all* compiler flags, such as -fexceptions and -std=c++0x, but the > problem here is: if you pass unrecognised flag

Re: [OctDev] bug with optim-1.1.0.tar.gz and mac os 10.7.4

2012-06-06 Thread c.
On 6 Jun 2012, at 13:15, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > There's also the issue that we have two mkoctfile programs, one in > bash and one in C++. there's actually 3 beacause there is also a .m version (which is just a front-end for one of th

Re: [OctDev] bug with optim-1.1.0.tar.gz and mac os 10.7.4

2012-06-06 Thread c.
//www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ax_blas.html I think the patch would need to be submitted upstream ... c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threa

Re: [OctDev] bug with optim-1.1.0.tar.gz and mac os 10.7.4

2012-06-05 Thread c.
so that mkoctfile -p BLAS_LIBS returns -Wl,-framework -Wl,Accelerate and mkoctfile `mkoctfile -p BLAS_LIBS` works fine for me c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today&

Re: [OctDev] [Pkg-octave-devel] secs1d needs bim

2012-06-05 Thread c.
a gmsh binary is available and give a warning if it isn't. or, as an alternative, you could simply patch msh on debian removing the two functions that require gmsh. c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusi

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

2012-06-05 Thread c.
a crutchm, we should find and test T. > > BTW: M = [A, B; C, D Thanks for the explanation. Are B and/or C above invertible? what are their sizes? c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will c

Re: [OctDev] [Pkg-octave-devel] secs1d needs bim

2012-06-04 Thread c.
this issue upstream you would have probably had better luck with getting help on this task. > Thomas c. P.S.: Please keep the octave-forge mailing list in CC as I'm not subscribed to the debian-octave mailing list. -

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

2012-06-04 Thread c.
to comment. Lukas, could you point to the specific BLAS routine that is giving different results here? c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and

Re: [OctDev] control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload

2012-06-04 Thread c.
xample, Debian packagers will not produce a .deb for your package until they see failing tests, and we reaally do want to see the control package in Debian! c. [1] * assert (Mo, Me, 1e-4); ! test failed assert (Mo,Me,1e-4) expected -0.23910 0.30720 1.16300 1.19670 -1.04

Re: [OctDev] Optimising the Keen-Minsky Model

2012-05-28 Thread c.
from the others so all the ODEs may be solved in parallel. what you do in each run will not affect others. so you can safely change how "increment" and "postprocess" interact. > TIA c. -- Live Security

Re: [OctDev] Problem installing packages

2012-05-24 Thread c.
On 24 May 2012, at 17:47, Mike Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:35 AM, c. wrote: >> >> On 24 May 2012, at 15:58, Olaf Till wrote: >> >>> If this change should be made for these packages, I'd advice to use >>> $(shell $(MKOCTFILE) -p ..._LI

Re: [OctDev] Problem installing packages

2012-05-24 Thread c.
ch time the variable $(LAPACK_LIBS) is used. Does anyone know the correct syntax (if any exists) for this type of nested variable substitution? c. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the w

Re: [OctDev] Problem installing packages

2012-05-23 Thread c.
On 23 May 2012, at 19:26, Olaf Till wrote: > So I think I'll load up a release tomorrow ... > > Olaf Please consider applying this additional change to the Makefile which is required when linkking Octave against Apple's VecLib framework and should do no harm otherwise.

Re: [OctDev] Comm package

2012-05-12 Thread c.
t;generate_package_html" function from the "generate_html" package and post them as well. > Do the devs have a preference if the directory name in the tar is > $package or $package-$version? > > -- > mike c. --

Re: [OctDev] Cleaning packages

2012-04-26 Thread c.
s anyone have more suggestion on how to clean the list a bit more? > Things that are too old, should be updated or merged? Functions that > should be removed? I think many functions on the struct package > already have core counterparts. > Carnë c.

Re: [OctDev] COMSOL layer

2012-04-20 Thread c.
at geopdes: http://geopdes.sourceforge.net c. -- For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/s

Re: [OctDev] contribution new export function

2012-04-18 Thread c.
> greetings > Markus Quite a few different versions of this function have already been proposed, see for example this thread: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Creating-Pretty-Report-from-Octave-tp2245980p2245980.html Maybe you could help by merging th

Re: [OctDev] secs1d 0.0.9 released

2012-03-31 Thread c.
9/doc/function > secs1d-0.0.9/doc/function/images > secs1d-0.0.9/inst > > > the bak looks puzzling > > Marco that's the old functions in case someone needs them they won't get automaically added

[OctDev] secs1d 0.0.9 released

2012-03-29 Thread c.
Version 0.0.9 of secs1d was just uploaded to Octave-Forge. This is a completely revamped version that is much simplified and includes a pdf manual ( + LaTeX sources) with problem equations, usage demos and function reference. Enjoy, c

Re: [OctDev] Getting package installation prefixes

2012-03-28 Thread c.
g on in the "default" branch so I think it will only be released with 3.8. c. -- This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure __

Re: [OctDev] Getting package installation prefixes

2012-03-27 Thread c.
along the lines of > > b{:}.archprefix ## doesn't work > > i.e., how to get that info for multiple pkgs? > I don't see how to avoid some for loop here. cellfun (@(x) x.prefix, b, "unif", false) > > P. c.

Re: [OctDev] Getting package installation prefixes

2012-03-27 Thread c.
On 27 Mar 2012, at 20:10, Philip Nienhuis wrote: >> b = a (cellfun(@(x) ismember (x.name, pkg_names), a, "unif", true)); > > ...which has many variations. One probably could even make this into a > two-liner. > > But how does this help to get the full path to the arch-dependent .oct > install

Re: [OctDev] Getting package installation prefixes

2012-03-26 Thread c.
e same info as your function does but for all installed packages. so pkg_info reduces essentially to the following three lines: pkg_names = {"secs1d", "ocs"}; a = pkg ("list"); b = a (cellfun(@(x) ismember (x.name, pkg_names), a, "unif", true)); c.

Re: [OctDev] How to deal with multi-packages with more than one src

2012-03-26 Thread c.
On 26 Mar 2012, at 12:45, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > 2012/3/26 c. : >> >> On 26 Mar 2012, at 10:41, Carnë Draug wrote: >> >>> I think a perl script would be better. >>> The pre_install and PKG_ADD >>> approach are more complicate to write and

Re: [OctDev] How to deal with multi-packages with more than one src

2012-03-26 Thread c.
n assume every package maintainer can use perl. > Carnë c. -- This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure __

Re: [OctDev] How to deal with multi-packages with more than one src

2012-03-26 Thread c.
On 26 Mar 2012, at 11:49, c. wrote: > On 26 Mar 2012, at 11:09, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > >> I am not sure that the idea of flatting the structure during install >> convince me. Is there a way to keep the folder structure and just >> manage/merge the src files with

Re: [OctDev] How to deal with multi-packages with more than one src

2012-03-26 Thread c.
possibility could be to have pre_install create PKG_ADD/PKG_DEL with system dependent values for path locations. c. -- This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/s

  1   2   3   >