Re: [OctDev] 'plot' package?

2010-03-03 Thread dbateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > > Hi All > > I just commited a new function, 'gplot3', to the 'plot' package. This is > simply the obvious 3D version of 'gplot' (I use it for visualising > motion capture data). When I added this function I noticed that the > 'plot' package contains some functions that

Re: [OctDev] Re moving arpack package?

2010-02-05 Thread dbateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > > Hi All > > If memory serves me correct, then the ARPACK functions (eigs, ...) have > been in core Octave for some time now. I think it is okay, to delete the > 'arpack' package from Octave-Forge SVN at this point. Any objections to > this? > > Søren > > Sure go ahe

Re: [OctDev] Basic implementations for isosurface, isocolors, isonormals

2009-03-08 Thread dbateman
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 01:14:49PM -0600, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > Martin, > > Using depthorder is creative. I'd like to point out that depthorder is > only an approximation to what should be "hidden surfaces". I worked on > many aspects of gnuplot. Although gnuplot does have a hidden line >

Re: [OctDev] Basic implementations for isosurface, isocolors, isonormals

2009-03-08 Thread dbateman
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 05:19:39PM +0100, S?ren Hauberg wrote: > For this, I'd say 'maintainers'. I'd recommend starting a thread on this > list about creating 3D patches in gnuplot. Just sketch your idea and see > if people have any comments. Perhaps somebody tried your idea before and > failed. A

Re: [OctDev] Problem inverse matrice in fedora 10

2008-12-11 Thread dbateman
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:28:59PM +0100, ronald.arvids...@privat.utfors.se wrote: > Hello, > > I don't know if this is the right place to post this issue. If not my > appologies. > > When trying the function inv(A) where A is a square matrice I get the > following error > > octave: symbol lo

Re: [OctDev] [patch] place function in control package

2008-12-08 Thread dbateman
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 07:09:18PM +0100, Luca Favatella wrote: > Perhaps we should mention the acker function in the INDEX file. > > I think it should be in the same category as the place function, i.e. > "Controller design". > > I attouch svn diff proposed. applied > > (I don't know the orde

Re: [OctDev] Invalid order 18 for Galois Field

2008-12-07 Thread dbateman
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:38:49PM +0100, Marco Maso wrote: > Please note that n=262128 can be obtained with a primitive polynomial > of grade 18 (n^18=262144) so we are far from GF(31) or GF(63) limit... > The grade of the generator is 168 as n-k=168 (so again its grade is > bigger than the primit

Re: [OctDev] Invalid order 18 for Galois Field

2008-12-05 Thread dbateman
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:21:32AM +0100, Marco Maso wrote: > When you talk about maximum grade 31 for a x86 and 63 for a x86_64 what > are you referring? > If you are referring to the grade of the generator polynomial I'm stuck > and I couldn't do anything without heavily moddifying the code (if I

Re: [OctDev] [patch] place function in control package

2008-12-05 Thread dbateman
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 02:54:27PM +0100, Luca Favatella wrote: > On 05/12/2008, Luca Favatella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > I propose this change to the INDEX file: > > -suggest using the place function instead of the acker (Matlab) function > > I thought that it is better to provide th

Re: [OctDev] register as developer

2008-12-04 Thread dbateman
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:15:50PM +0100, fabio.de.bona wrote: > Hi All, > I would like to contribute a MOSEK interface for Octave. For this reason > I would like to register as a developer. > > My sourceforge username is fabiodebona > Fabio, I don't see any problem with this, but the way octa

Re: [OctDev] arpack install failed (Ubuntu)

2008-12-04 Thread dbateman
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:40:01PM +, R.N.Palmer wrote: > The current license of ARPACK is found at > http://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/RiceBSD.txt#LICENSE, and does > remove the notification requirement. > > I agree that making this a default part of Octave, or at least providing >

Re: [OctDev] Invalid order 18 for Galois Field

2008-11-29 Thread dbateman
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:45:55PM +0100, Marco Maso wrote: > So you are telling me that my problem can't be solved. I confirm that > Matlab has this limitation too. Well in Matlab I'd say that yes the problem is unsolvable. However for Octave, you have the source.. Change the lines galoisfield.

Re: [OctDev] do_fortran_indexing, warn_fortran_indexing

2008-11-29 Thread dbateman
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:15:30PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > Hi, > > audio/inst/clip.m still references the two variables. Any objections to > deleting the check? I thought I got most of them already.. No go right ahead and remove them D.

Re: [OctDev] Invalid order 18 for Galois Field

2008-11-29 Thread dbateman
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 09:28:50PM +0100, Marco Maso wrote: > I'm currently working with BCH codes yet, since September, and after > having solved my initial problems I receive a new error if i try to > encode a word of length ~ 2^18 I receive: > > error: invalid order 18 for Galois Field > > To

Re: [OctDev] Trying to compile from source and running into an issue

2008-09-17 Thread dbateman
Jaroslav Hajek-2 wrote: > > If CHOLMOD is compiled to be linked with METIS, then you need to link > it with METIS, i.e. provide -lmetis in LIBS. The configure script > doesn't currently discover it itself (though probably it should). An > alternative is to manually recreate libcholmod.a to incl

Re: [OctDev] Exporting only one package

2008-08-27 Thread dbateman
Thomas Weber-8 wrote: > > Is it possible to do something like > > make package audio > ? > ./autgen.sh ./configure mkdir packages/main cd main make pkg/audio I do this all the time :-) D. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Exporting-only-one-package-tp1918

Re: [OctDev] __magick_read__ is broken for imagemagick-6.4.0

2008-07-28 Thread dbateman
ImageMagick has never been able to keep a stale API and this is why the GraphicsMagick library exists as a fork of ImageMagick.. In any case imread/imwrite have been ported to Octave itself using the GraphicsMagick libraries and will appear in a 3.2.x release. It would still be nice to have this f

Re: [OctDev] Bug in rgbplot (image pkg)

2008-07-25 Thread dbateman
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > A bug report has been filed against the Debian package octave-image [1] > and > has been fixed with a patch [2]. Thanks in advance for considering this. > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/491878 > [2] > http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/*checkout*/pkg-octave/octave-forge

Re: [OctDev] Re quest for new member

2008-07-25 Thread dbateman
Jonathan M.-2 wrote: > > Hi, > I read this in your website : "To register as a developer send a request > to the octave-forge mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Include a bit of > information about the code you plan to submit." So I do it. > > I'm French and I don't have a perfect level in englis

Re: [OctDev] shift of a fractional number of samples

2008-07-16 Thread dbateman
Eric Chassande-Mottin wrote: > > I have written a function ( > http://www.nabble.com/file/p18490379/fracshift.m code attached, > fracshift.m ) which performs the shift of a data vector > (e.g., a time-series) by a fractional number of samples. this is useful > in area such as antenna array proc

Re: [OctDev] Crash: double free or corruption (!prev):

2008-07-12 Thread dbateman
Martijn Brouwer-8 wrote: > > When trying to solve an apparently singular linear system, octave > crashed with a memory error. See below. I attached the octave core dump. > (These file compress really well) > > Martijn > I think this is a known problem and has been corrected in 3.0.1. So upgr

Re: [OctDev] Uploading mingw32 octave binaries - where and how?

2008-07-06 Thread dbateman
Benjamin Lindner wrote: > > OK, I took a look at it, and installed the win32 version. > But it does not really seem to work - The program just hangs after > entering sourceforge username&password. ?? > Ok I don't see this issue luckily as an octave-forge release would be painful without rele

Re: [OctDev] Uploading mingw32 octave binaries - where and how?

2008-07-06 Thread dbateman
Benjamin Lindner wrote: > > Michael Goffioul wrote: >> Well, the installer I wrote does a little bit more than simply unpacking: >> - select components to install, with some auto-detection at startup >> to select reasonable default config >> - detect CPU architecture and auto-select ATLAS >> -

Re: [OctDev] Uploading mingw32 octave binaries - where and how?

2008-06-26 Thread dbateman
Benjamin Lindner wrote: > > I hope this is the correct place to ask, I loked around the project and > it seemed the most appropriate list. > > I'd like to (finally) contribute binary packages of octave built with > and bundled with the mingw32 gcc. > Great, I added the release technician f

Re: [OctDev] my virusscanner found a Worm in octave.exe

2008-06-21 Thread dbateman
James K. Lowden-2 wrote: > > To verify the integrity of your build environment, it would be well to > have two people build identical binaries with matching fingerprints. The > likelihood of two identical infections is vanishingly small. > Thems fightin words... Seriously, we limited by the

Re: [OctDev] Octave Factory...

2008-05-22 Thread dbateman
Molamini wrote: > > Hello, > I would like to use Octave in a C++ multithreaded application. Is there > something like this (see code below) in Octave so I can get an instance of > Octave and use it throughout the life of my OctaveUser object? > > class OctaveUser > { >private: > Octa

Re: [OctDev] New release of Octave Forge

2008-05-21 Thread dbateman
Thomas Weber-8 wrote: > > The hex2num.cc file also contains this num2hex. > Maybe a missing autoload()? > Oppps I backported from 3.1 and Octave itself adds the autoloads automatically.. Sorry can't patch at the moment, but the fix is easy. D. -- View this message in context: http://www

Re: [OctDev] risk of patent infringement?

2008-05-20 Thread dbateman
O. Octavian wrote: > > Hello! > I think it is no secret that the octave interpreter is not too efficient. > I got interested in interpreter technologies during a computer science > course, and if it could be a useful contribution, I would try to improve > the octave interpreter. > > Now my que

Re: [OctDev] Where to Put Test Files?

2008-05-19 Thread dbateman
Bill Denney-5 wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working on tblread and tblwrite from the statistics toolbox. I am > making a few test files, and I'd like to include the test files in > subversion in a way that they could be tested upon building, but I don't > see a place to put test files for a pack

Re: [OctDev] New release of Octave Forge

2008-04-29 Thread dbateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > > Hi All, > I've just released a new version of the Octave Forge packages. This is > a fairly large release with many new exiting features, and many bugs > fixed. > The function reference section of the website seems to be broken from my browser D. -- View this

Re: [OctDev] autoconf files in packages

2008-04-17 Thread dbateman
Jaroslav Hajek-2 wrote: > > hello, > > I feel a little confused - what is the recommended way of using > autoconf scripts in OctaveForge packages? > I have src/configure.in directory, but I have noticed that most other > packages have src/configure.base, which is then > turned into src/configu

Re: [OctDev] Re gistration request

2008-04-12 Thread dbateman
Massimiliano Culpo wrote: > > I registered two days ago to souceforge, as I saw it was necessary to > submit my code. > > My username is: culpo > > M. > Ok, you're added D. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Re-gistration-request-tp16648501p16648701.html Sent fr

Re: [OctDev] Re gistration request

2008-04-12 Thread dbateman
Massimiliano Culpo wrote: > > I would like to be registered as a developer. > I plan to contribute a package to perform circuit simulation. > Usually we ask to see a bit of code before giving developer access. However you are already marked as an author in sourceforge so arguably you already

Re: [OctDev] Documentation for communications package

2008-04-06 Thread dbateman
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > L. And this means that we _must_ ship the source used for building it. >> >> I wrote a lot of the code in the comms toolbox (the majority in terms of >> line count), and wrote the documentation. I suppose except for a couple >> of >> corner cases, I can give perm

Re: [OctDev] Documentation for communications package

2008-04-06 Thread dbateman
Thomas Weber-8 wrote: > > On 06/04/08 13:09 -0700, dbateman wrote: >> Yes it was intentional. I didn't want to add a build dependency on the >> package on texinfo.. I suppose we might add the original documentation >> and >> only build it is the correct depen

Re: [OctDev] Copyright and licensing terms for doc/symbolic.html

2008-04-06 Thread dbateman
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > File doc/symbolic.html is shipped without Copyright notice and licensing > terms. Is this file generated from other sources? > > We need this information in order to finalize the Debian package for > symbolic. > I don't think the license of the documentation is

Re: [OctDev] Patch: Improved filename/symbol completing

2008-04-06 Thread dbateman
c. wrote: > > Kristian, > > I think you are posting to the wrong list: > octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net is for discussing development and > use of octave-forge packages > as your patch touches liboctave which is part of octave itself I think > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is more appropriate > > c.

Re: [OctDev] Documentation for communications package

2008-04-06 Thread dbateman
Thomas Weber-8 wrote: > > Hi, > > the tarball for the communication 1.0.5 release only has the pdf, > neither the .png nor the .txi files found in the SVN archive. Is this > intentional? > Yes it was intentional. I didn't want to add a build dependency on the package on texinfo.. I suppose

Re: [OctDev] prctile(x, [a b]) returns column instead of row vector

2008-04-01 Thread dbateman
G.. wrote: > > In matlab, prctile(x, p) returns the same kind of vector as p (row or > column), whereas octave always returns a column vector. I think matlab's > behavior is more logical. > > G. > This is not the only problem in the compatibility of prctile.. Consider the comment in prctile

Re: [OctDev] patch to textread.cc

2008-04-01 Thread dbateman
Eric Chassande-Mottin wrote: > > hi, > > with the following patch, textread.cc returns an empty > matrix rather than an error when reading an empty file > which is, I believe the expected behavior. > cheers, eric. > I applied it.. Since you're looking at this maybe you can see what is neede

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-29 Thread dbateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA-2 wrote: > > After one day rest, my condition rather better so that I can think about > this with cool head. > Some good news :-) > Cannot src/Makefile in the fixed package come back before for mingw/cygwin > pat without affective for > Unix build ? > > My previous patch

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-29 Thread dbateman
Michael Goffioul-2 wrote: > > I think you need to create the import library for fixed.oct (something > like > libfixed.a). This import lib is automatically generated by MSVC when there > are exported symbols. This is not the case for MinGW, you need some > additional compile flags. > > Michael

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-28 Thread dbateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA-2 wrote: > > Main problem is that new Makefile by you did not give a > liboctave_fixed.dll.a > so that the link seeme to be failed. > The idea was to try and link against the fixed.oct file rather than a separate library. That is what Michael did under MSVC, so I suspect th

Re: [OctDev] Re lease date for the packages

2008-03-23 Thread dbateman
Thomas Weber-8 wrote: > > Hi, > > some packages (eg image-1.0.5) have a release of 2007-12-05, which > should be 2008-..., shouldn't it? > > Thomas > The release dates are updated by hand and so this might happen.. Perhaps we should look at a manner of automatically updating the rele

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-22 Thread dbateman
Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson wrote: > > Hey .. it seems that the fixed package fails to build on debian with > the following error messages: > I believe its fixed in the SVN. This was a failed attempt for a fix for the cygwin/mingw platform that had other consequences.. D. -- View this message i

Re: [OctDev] Genetic algorithms in Octave

2008-03-12 Thread dbateman
Luca Favatella wrote: > > > __ieee754_bitstring2double__.m obtains a double from its ieee754 bit > string. > Is there already any function in Octave/Octave-Forge to do this? > If yes, I could remove a lot of code from this function. > If not, could it be useful as a public function out of this

Re: [OctDev] Simplifying autotool files?

2008-03-09 Thread dbateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > > Should we make an effort to simplify these files? > Sure we should, the goal at the time was to make sure we made no mistakes and cut out too much. I see no reason not to simplify these Once we start supporting 3.0.x and 3.1.x there might be some issues, though I

Re: [OctDev] OT spam

2008-03-08 Thread dbateman
dbateman wrote: > > > At the moment only Paul Kienzle and myself are informed of any held > messages as administrators for the list. I've added a moderators password. > So if someone wants to help moderating, send me an e-mail address to > subscribe as a moderator and y

Re: [OctDev] char() function for symbolic expression

2008-03-06 Thread dbateman
Nils Bluthgen wrote: > > Hi, > > it seems that the current symbolic toolbox has does not have > something like the matlab char() function. I have written a small > patch to the symbolic toolbox which adds a to_char() function by > which one can convert an expression to char. Would be nic

Re: [OctDev] OT spam

2008-03-06 Thread dbateman
Nicolau Werneck wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. I was just wondering because this is the list I > get more spam from, and it seems gmail can't filter it properly... I > wasn't aware of the need to make it open. > > How does the moderation work? I might voluteer if it is not too > complicated

Re: [OctDev] OT spam

2008-03-05 Thread dbateman
Quentin Spencer wrote: > > I never get spam from this list, but that's apparently because it gets > filtered by my mail provider so I never see it. The problem is that > every few weeks I get notices that I'm about to be unsubscribed because > mail sent to me through the list is being bounce

Re: [OctDev] Re gistration as an octave-forge developer

2008-03-05 Thread dbateman
annoa wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to be registered as an octave-forge developer. > > My plan is to work on the translation of octave in french langage. > It will help my student using octave. > > best regards > > Annoa > >

Re: [OctDev] octave-audio misplaces executable

2008-03-01 Thread dbateman
Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson wrote: > > Hi > > When installing the octave-audio package the executable is put into > /usr/share/octave/packages/audio-1.0.3/bin/ > instead of > /usr/lib/octave/packages/audio-1.0.3 > like the FS standard says it should (and this causes an error for > linda package ch

Re: [OctDev] auload patch for 24-bit

2008-03-01 Thread dbateman
Seems fine to me (at least looking at it) and it shouldn't affect the other functionality, so why not commit it.. Cheers D. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/auload-patch-for-24-bit-tp15700408p15779107.html Sent from the octave-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [OctDev] bug in csape

2008-03-01 Thread dbateman
Carlo de Falco-2 wrote: > > No, well, > I meant if I check it into splines rather than msh :) > c. > I think I'm the last one to hack the spline code, converting it to use the sparse tri-diagonal solvers in octave itself and moving part of it in to octave. So I don't think its that actively m

Re: [OctDev] Re gistration request

2008-01-24 Thread dbateman
Christos Saragiotis wrote: > > Hi, > > this is a registration request as a developer. > > I'd like to participate to the Octave translation project i.e. > contribute to the translation of the help in the greek language > > Regards, > > Christos Saragiotis > Hi Christos, This will be a

Re: [OctDev] Creating library file in fixed package for mingw

2008-01-20 Thread dbateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA-2 wrote: > > Hi David > > Please apply the patch in my previous mail to src/Makefile in the fixed > package. > Could you create a patch with svn diff -r HEAD Makefile instead of the diff you've done. I applied one of your previous non-working for MSVC patches and so the pa