Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

nt, the diagram is too vague, would you please help update it? > > > > BR, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] *On > Behalf Of *Jessie Jewitt > *Sent:* Friday, August 24, 2018 1:39 AM > *To:* onap-discuss ; &

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

types are empty. I'll fill those in next week. -Jessie On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Jessie Jewitt < jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote: > Hi Xu- > Two comments: > 1. I will mark association member ends and referenced classes as > experimental and put them in the ou

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

PM, Xu Yang wrote: > Hi Jessie, > > > > Please see inline. > > > > Best regards, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] *On > Behalf Of *Jessie Jewitt > *Sent:* Thursday, August 23, 2018 1:44 AM >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

o is for VnfExtCp. > >From my understanding, ConnectivityType should be in the > NsVirtualLinkDesc, which hasn't been put in the papyrus class diagram , I > think it is the point where should update. > > > > > > > > BR, > > Chuyi. > > > > > >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

t is the point where should update. > > > > > BR, > > Chuyi. > > > > > > > > > > > > 邮件原文 > *发件人：*Jessie Jewitt > *收件人：*"yangxu (H)" > *抄 送: *"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" > *发送时间：*2018-

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

DC > team. > > > > Please share your opinions on this issue and let’s try to finalize the > clean model before the deadline, thanks. > > > > Best regards, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] *On >

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Network Service Descriptor model

Please review and provide comments by 8/13 (on the wiki) for the proposed Network Service Descriptor model. It was aligned with ETSI IFA014 v2.4.4. Thanks, Jessie -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Creation of R3 IM Clean

Xu- As discussed in the meeting this morning, I propose that R3 IM Clean be generated from Papyrus. The following activities would have to be done in order to do this, if not already done: Kevin: Update VNF model - Add VnfInstance/VnfcInstance - Align VNF model with IFA011 V2.5.1

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Information Model in Papyrus

We finally have a "draft" ONAP model in a working branch in Gerrit. It contains modeling work that is in progress, and does not represent anything committed yet to R3. When the model is approved, it will move to a master branch. If you would like to use Papyrus for viewing this model, you can

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements

Hello DENG Hui, I think it has been beneficial to collect and review the modeling requirements for R3. Thank you for doing this. I have a few questions for you, if you would be so kind as to answer: 1. The requirements were supposed to be completed, according to the Casablanca Release

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

er interested people)could accept it. > Anyway, I encourage the proposer to discuss with Jessie to address her > comments. Or we need to discuss it the next week. > > Best regards, > Xu Yang > *发件人：*jessie jewitt > *收件人：*yangxu (H), > *抄 送：*denghui (L),onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

pe of the model is still under discussion. The interest > group just agrees that the IISOMI definition of “obsolete” fits the current > intention of the proposal and decides to use the term. > > > > BR, > > Xu > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

Hello Deng Hui- Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied stereotype", on which this column in the wiki table is based, has "obsolete" as an artifact lifecycle option, with its definition supplied in the IISOMI Modeling Guidelines. This is the definition of "obsolete" in

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session - Reminder and Bridge

Hello- This is a reminder that the Papyrus training session will take place today at 9am Eastern time. Bridge info: https://zoom.us/j/746737796 Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

Sorry for the continued confusion about the bridge. We will be using Kevin's bridge: https://zoom.us/j/746737796 Thank you, Jessie On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 6:13 PM, jessie jewitt < jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote: > The VNFSDK Modeling team is hosting a Papyrus trainin

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

: > All, > > > > We will use the following zoom meeting instead. > > > > https://zoom.us/j/987452560 > > > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > > > > *From:* jessie jewitt > *Sent:* Monday, June 04, 2018 8:14 PM > *To:* onap-discuss &

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

https://zoom.us/j/987452560 > > > > Regards, > > Kevin > > > > > > *From:* jessie jewitt > *Sent:* Monday, June 04, 2018 8:14 PM > *To:* onap-discuss > *Cc:* MAYER, ANDREW J ; SCAGGS, KEVIN ; > Brian Hedstrom > *Subject:* [modeling] Papyrus T

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus Training Session

The VNFSDK Modeling team is hosting a Papyrus training session on Wednesday, June 13th at 6am Pacific / 9am Eastern / 9pm China time This session will cover: 1. How to install Papyrus 2. The value of using a modeling tool such as Papyrus within ONAP 3. How to use Papyrus alongside the wiki. We

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Usage of Stereotypes in Modeling and Deprecating Attributes

1) Usage of Stereotypes in Modeling I took an action item from this morning's resource modeling call to write up how stereotypes are used in modeling. The information can be found here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Stereotypes Please take a few moments to familiarize yourself with this

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Request for last call for comment on WAN service proposal

Hi DENG Hui- Do you want the comments on the wiki page or via email. Sorry, it wasn't clear to me. -Jessie On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:57 PM, denghui (L) wrote: > Hello all > > > > Per service call discussion yesterday, this is 2 weeks call for comment on > WAN service

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

Actually, the MEF is NOT using these guidelines anymore, mainly due to the > errors with respect to UML interpretation and the restrictions placed on > what UML artifacts can be used in a model. > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM, jessie jewitt <jessie.jewitt@ > oamtechno

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

out what UML is > and is not, and greatly limits the power of using UML constructs. > > John > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:07 PM, jessie jewitt <jessie.jewitt@ > oamtechnologies.com> wrote: > >> Hello Hui and Lingli- >> I've noticed that the modeling guideline

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

Hello Hui and Lingli- I've noticed that the modeling guidelines defined here: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003072 do not specify that we should be following the industry defined UML Modeling Guidelines (IISOMI 514) and Papyrus Guidelines (IISOMI 515) defined here:

Re: [onap-discuss] [multicloud] Last Call for Feedback of MultiVIM Metrics for VES Requirement

This is a long email chain. Could you please provide a link to the document that is supposed to be reviewed and for which we should provide feedback? Thank you, Jessie On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:14 PM, HU, BIN wrote: > Hello my fellow colleagues in MultiVIM project, > > > >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello- I don't remember this being an action out of the modelling committee meeting yesterday. How does it compare to the action item from another meeting that Alex, Thinh, Anatoly and myself took to work on the IM to DM model mapping, and the mappings that have already been proposed (and

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

> > > == > no decision yet, will be discussed during R3. Maybe ONAP and ETSI > NFV board level relationship also related. > > > > Thanks > > > > DENG Hui > > > > > > BR > > Michela > > > > > > > > > &

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Identifiers in R2 IM descriptors

ty contained in the Vdu.compute node. > > > > Regards > > shitao > > *发件人:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *代表 *jessie jewitt > *发送时间:* 2018年3月7日 1:57 > *收件人:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org > *主题:* [onap-discuss] [mo

[onap-discuss] [modeling]

The results of the modeling tool poll regarding GitHub taken here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll Are 14 people approve the use of GitHub. Nobody is opposed. So we will proceed with the use of GitHub. -Jessie ___ onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Support for HPA in SOL001 mapping

I'm not seeing the support in the SOL001 spec for all the HPA related attributes in the IM that we are specifying here: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25436710 For example, in our VirtualCpuDesc class there is an attribute vduCpuRequirements that says gets mapped to

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Identifiers in R2 IM descriptors

As I'm unable to attend the early discussions regarding the R2 IM model, I hope you will please take my feedback into consideration. The ETSI descriptors (classes) that we map into R2 IM descriptor classes all have identifiers, i.e. VNFDesc (vnfdId), VDUDesc (vduId), etc. The ETSI datatypes that

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

001 (TOSCA model) data > model, https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25436710. (see > SOL001 Mapping column). The mapping table shows that all of ONAP Resource > IM attributes are mapped into TOSCA types with detail. Except for any of > new attributes (“orange” highligh

[onap-discuss] [modeling] SOL001 DM mapping

This is a resend, as I didn't see the message show up in the modeling discussion. My apology if you have already received it. == This message is particularly directed to Anatoly, Alex, and Thinh, as we have an action item to map ONAP IM

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

This message is particularly directed to Anatoly, Alex, and Thinh, as we have an action item to map ONAP IM to DM. If one of you could respond, I'd appreciate it. My understanding is that SOL001 is mapping the VNFD model to TOSCA. They indicate they are mapping the ETSI NFV elements listed below

[onap-discuss] [modeling] R2 IM Class diagram

Hello- I'm looking for the class diagram that corresponds to the classes defined here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version One would think it would be the diagram that is on the ONAP R2+ Resource IM Clean Version wiki page:

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Hi- I'm trying to understand how the IM model proposed for R2 compares to IFA011. When I look on this wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resource+IM+Discussion+Based+on+IFA011 it looks like the IFA011 model was reviewed and decisions were made. For example, in the VNFD, one decision was

[onap-discuss] [modeling] GitHub poll

This is a reminder that the poll regarding use of GitHub with Papyrus will close tomorrow. Here is the link to the poll: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Liaison to ETSI

In our modeling meeting last week we discussed making a formal contribution to ETSI. Does ONAP have an official liaison relationship to ETSI? If so, is there a process we follow for making contributions? Thanks, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Poll for use of GitHub

Please vote on the poll regarding the use of GitHub for versioning of Papyrus models. It is located at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll The poll closes on 2/28/18. Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list