Re: build svtools and sw with debug

--- Ven 28/9/12, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann ha scritto: > Da: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann . > >> > > > > Actually, the key definition is here: > > > > http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/xref/Current%20(trunk)/solenv/inc/settings.mk#894 > > > > We already ignore USE_STLP_DEBUG for OS2. Should

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

Hi, On 27.09.2012 21:54, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Answering to myself ... - Original Message - From: Pedro Giffuni ... Hi Ariel; From: Ariel Constenla-Haile On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: The big question here, at least for me, is why a bo

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

Hi, On 27.09.2012 17:16, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 27.09.2012 16:11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Pedro, * On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:47:31AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Please note that many people did Windows (and linux and MacOSX) builds just fine with the new boost. There w

Re: Translators needed for Wizard Templates Titles

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:02:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hello *, > > Bug 110378 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=110378 found > a total of 292 templates without localized Title, in 11 Languages (es, > eu, fr, it, ja, ko, pt-BR, sk, sv, zh-CN, zh-TW). > > The affected

Re: [Call for review] 120620 - [Feature]Add the List Level attribute for paragraph styles in Aoo Writer

Hi, On 07.09.2012 10:05, Huaidong Qiu wrote: I created a patch for attribute list level of paragraph style, please review, here is the issue link https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120620 I have started the review. Please have a look at my comments in the Bugzilla issue. Best r

RE: Marketing and traveling expenses

I wonder if we could coordinate a list or other resource for linking conferences with local or other business sponsors, if there is not one yet. Is there, or is anyone interested in collaborating on the idea? J. M. Grenier, M.Ed. Middlesex Community College Faculty, Business and Humanities greni

Re: new subscriber

Original Message From: Roy Dubriel To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:33:08 +1200 > Hello,Open office: > > May I subscribe?"I am Roy Dubriel and I approve this e-mail",Roy > Dubriel. Roy, You are welcome to join this list. Information about subscribing t

Re: [UX] [Call for review] Task Prioritization Survey Questions

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > FC, > > I'm not familiar with Base, so did not capture in this iteration of the > survey questions. > > Would you be able to contribute this section? > > Thoughts? > > Regards, > Kevin > > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:44 PM, RGB ES wrote: >

OpenOffice.org Business Partnership Inquiry

Hi OpenOffice.org Webmaster, I'm sorry to bother you. I am Faith from Filepuma.com. I write to you just to consult whether we can have a potential chance to cooperate with you. And recently we have updated your product at our site that you

new subscriber

Hello,Open office: May I subscribe?"I am Roy Dubriel and I approve this e-mail",Roy Dubriel.

Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC Chair

I would also like to nominate Donald Harbison (dpharbison) Louis Suarez-Potts (louis) Pedro Giffuni (pfg) as candidates of the PMC Chair. They are all well known in the community. On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Andrew Rist wrote: > I would like to nominate Andrea Pescetti.

Re: Did we ever reach consensus on support for Windows 2000

Recently, I didn't see anyone testing our product on Windows 2000, at least as I know active QA are not doing any testing against this platform, therefore can we say we have no former testing on this platform. And if any user report a Win2K special issue, what's priority to us to fix it? 2012/9/28

Re: small patch to AOO

Hi again do you mind applying follwing patch? without that, even though apache-commons are specified in the configure, it does use internal one instead. $ less files/patch-configure.in --- configure.in~ 2012-09-21 20:42:22.0 +0900 +++ configure.in2012-09-26 13:32:06.00

small patch to AOO

Hi Pedro and *, do you mind applying follwing patch? FreeBSD system sed doesn't accept -i itself. it should be -i.bak and it looks we should specify prior to -r or -e. $ less files/patch-sed --- swext/mediawiki/makefile.mk 2012-09-21 20:36:58.0 +0900 +++ swext/mediawiki/makefile.mk 2012

Re: [DISCUSS][WWW] maybe time for a home page facelift?

On Sep 27, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > KG 02 - See comments inline. > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> >> >> On 09/25/2012 09:55 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: >> >>> KG01 - See comments inline >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Dave Fisher >>> wrote:

[Call for Test] [Enhancement]Graphic Bullets Interoperability Improvement with MS Word Binary Format

Hi, I will improve the graphic bullets fidelity with MS Word binary format through the enhancement issue https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120928.Please refer to the details from the wiki http://s.apache.org/W8v. Any volunteer can help me the test work?Thanks in advance. -- Best Reg

[Proposal]Propose to Improve the Graphic Bullets Interoperability with MS Word Binary Format

Hi Graphic Bullet is a kind of bullet that is used in both MS Office and Apache OpenOffice.org. And it provides fancy graphics to replace the special characters as bullets and is used broadly. Unfortunately, till now, Apache OpenOffice.org Writer can not provide the fidelity with MS Word on the fu

Re: [DISCUSS]: AOO 3.4.1 reflection and lessons learned

Hello All, To me, Rob's quote is about achieving a flow state, where we can just do perform, without worrying about mechanics. Great goal. As a designer of software, I realize our work is never done. We will either add something new, enhance some existing stuff, fix some broken stuff, and in some

Re: [DISCUSS][WWW] maybe time for a home page facelift?

KG 02 - See comments inline. On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 09/25/2012 09:55 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > >> KG01 - See comments inline >> >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Dave Fisher >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 25, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >>> >>

Re: mWiki logo design

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:05 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: > On 9/27/2012 12:35, imacat wrote: > >> On 2012/09/27 17:25, Alexandro Colorado said: >> >>> Hi I worked on the updated header of the mWiki site with the current >>> Apache >>> OO Logo including the gull symbols and the correct integration with

News article integration with home page

Kay has started a page on the wiki to list possible areas where we can improve the website: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=30737243 One of the ideas concerned the little news stories that we put on the home page. Since I think I'm the only one that has been main

Re: mWiki logo design

On 9/27/2012 12:35, imacat wrote: On 2012/09/27 17:25, Alexandro Colorado said: Hi I worked on the updated header of the mWiki site with the current Apache OO Logo including the gull symbols and the correct integration with the gradient background. Anyone can help me out understand how to commit

Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC Chair

I would like to nominate Andrea Pescetti. Andrea is one of the most active and well respected members of the project, and I believe he would make a great PMC Chair. Andrew On 9/27/2012 2:42 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: Moving right along... I'd like to restart the discussion over choosing a PMC

Re: [DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed Initial PMC List

Thanks, Andrew. Actually, Andrew, thanks for doing so much of this. Cheers Louis On 12-09-27, at 17:50 , Andrew Rist wrote: > I would like to propose the following list as the initial PMC for Apache > OpenOffice. > I will leave the discussion on this list open until at least the end of > Mo

[DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed Initial PMC List

I would like to propose the following list as the initial PMC for Apache OpenOffice. I will leave the discussion on this list open until at least the end of Monday (that's midnight in the last timezone for Monday - all Monday postmarks accepted) (that's at least 96 hours for those that are coun

Re: Did we ever reach consensus on support for Windows 2000

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Greetings All; > > I was going through FAQ's and other pages on the AOO (incubating) site and > noticed that many still are showing that we support Windows 2000 as a > baseline operating system. I though I remembered some discussions a whi

[DISCUSS] [PMC] Proposed PMC Chair

Moving right along... I'd like to restart the discussion over choosing a PMC Chair. The previous proposed process was discussed in: http://markmail.org/message/mrgnjtiuum5bovjd I'd like to take up where that left off. Here is the process (with minor modifications) from the original: You c

Re: Did we ever reach consensus on support for Windows 2000

Am 09/27/2012 05:11 AM, schrieb Fernando Cassia: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Stuart Swales wrote: Also, moving to Visual Studio 2010 will likely kill off running on Windows 2000 (and Windows XP prior to SP2). The Visual C++ run-time library now uses the EncodePointer function which was in

Re: Did we ever reach consensus on support for Windows 2000

Am 09/27/2012 05:03 AM, schrieb Wolf Halton: I think it more feasible to edit the website than to test on win2k in any meaningful way. I understand it in this way, that you suggest to delete the Windows 2000 support from the webpages and therefore cancel any support somewhat silently. Is that

Re: [proposed PMC] call for feedback: Are you willing to serve as a PMC member?

Am 09/26/2012 11:37 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Hi, this is a call for feedback to the people who are (currently) on the proposed PMC list. Please provide feedback, if you are willing to serve as a PMC member. The current (copied from initial post of thread [1]) proposed PMC list is:

Re: [FOSDEM-Devrooms] FOSDEM 2013 devroom request: Apache OpenOffice

Hi Andrea, Thank you for your devroom proposal, we have added it to the list of candidates. Kind regards, Tias On 09/27/2012 10:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: (sent on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PPMC: http://s.apache.org/PI0 ) * Devroom name: Apache OpenOffice * Description Apache Op

Re: [DISCUSS][WWW] maybe time for a home page facelift?

On 09/25/2012 09:55 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: KG01 - See comments inline On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: On Sep 25, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: Should we have a webdev list? We discussed using the tags [WWW] last year. In the past we did had dedica

Re: Amazon Download of Apache OpenOffice 3.4

Hi, On 12-09-19, at 03:10 , Issac Goldstand wrote: > On 17/09/2012 19:01, Dave Fisher wrote: >> On Sep 15, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> >> 8. Going through the one-click purchase of the $0.00 software, I was not >> sent the executable. Instead, I was sent an "Amazon OpenOff

Re: Call for comments: Webpage for Listing OpenOffice Consultants

On 12-09-27, at 13:44 , Rob Weir wrote: >> >> My main concern was to not highlight commercial support entities via a >> direct link from the home page over other types of support. >> > > That's fine. It can be an interior link. I just want to make sure it > is findable by a visitor without

Re: [DISCUSS][WWW] maybe time for a home page facelift?

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 09/27/2012 10:31 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On 09/25/2012 03:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 25, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >>>

Re: [proposed PMC] call for feedback: Are you willing to serve as a PMC member?

Sorry for the delay. I am out of the country on business in Bulgaria. I am glad to be able to serve on the pmc. On Sep 27, 2012 5:53 PM, "Regina Henschel" wrote: > Hi, > > Oliver-Rainer Wittmann schrieb: > >> Hi, >> >> this is a call for feedback to the people who are (currently) on the >> propos

Re: [DISCUSS][WWW] maybe time for a home page facelift?

On 09/27/2012 10:31 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 09/25/2012 03:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: On Sep 25, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: Should we have a webdev list? We discussed using the tags [WWW] last year. In

Re: OpenOffice Developer Room (devroom) at FOSDEM

On 25/09/2012 Juergen Schmidt wrote: Am Montag, 24. September 2012 um 21:32 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: If nobody else steps up, I'll send the application after we have consensus on it, but if anybody else wants to take over from now on, it's absolutely OK for me, provided we meet the deadlines, i.

FOSDEM 2013 devroom request: Apache OpenOffice

(sent on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PPMC: http://s.apache.org/PI0 ) * Devroom name: Apache OpenOffice * Description Apache OpenOffice, formerly known as OpenOffice.org, is one of the most popular Free and Open Source software projects. The project, hosted by the Apache Software Foundation

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

Answering to myself ... - Original Message - > From: Pedro Giffuni  ... > > Hi Ariel; > >> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile > >> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>>   The big question here, at least for me, is why a boost update causes >>> trouble to

Re: [UX] [Call for review] Task Prioritization Survey Questions

Hi Kevin, Kevin Grignon schrieb: Hello All, I've captured a series of questions for inclusion in an upcoming AOO survey. The questions are intended to help us understand which features and capabilities are most frequently used in the editors. Insight from this survey will help us focus our atte

Re: [DISCUSS][WWW] maybe time for a home page facelift?

On 9/27/12, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On Sep 26, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On 09/25/2012 03:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sep 25, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> >> >> >>> Should we have a

Re: [DISCUSS]: AOO 3.4.1 reflection and lessons learned

Hi On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > AOO 3.4.1 was our second release and I would like to do some reflection > of the past and especially the hot phase in the end where we tried to > finalize the version. Things that were not so good and that can and > should be improved in

Re: Help us brainstorm ideas for Apache OpenOffice 4.0

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> As we perform the final preparations to release Apache OpenOffice >>> 3.4.1 it is a good time to look ahead to the future. A big >>> oppo

Re: build svtools with debug

Am 26.09.2012 18:19, schrieb Armin Le Grand:> > Index: Library_hatchwindowfactory.mk > === > --- Library_hatchwindowfactory.mk (revision 1389804) > +++ Library_hatchwindowfactory.mk (working copy) > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ >

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

Hi Ariel; > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> The big question here, at least for me, is why a boost update causes >> trouble to stlport and why it only affects Windows. > > Google lead me to > http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > The big question here, at least for me, is why a boost update causes trouble > to stlport and why it only affects Windows. Google lead me to http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-build-boost-1-48-with-STLport-5-2-1-td4372308.html

Re: Call for comments: Webpage for Listing OpenOffice Consultants

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> > see inline below... >> > >> > >> > On 09/26/2012 02:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Rob Weir wro

Re: [DISCUSS]: AOO 3.4.1 reflection and lessons learned

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > AOO 3.4.1 was our second release and I would like to do some reflection > of the past and especially the hot phase in the end where we tried to > finalize the version. Things that were not so good and that can and > should be improve

Re: [DISCUSS][WWW] maybe time for a home page facelift?

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 09/25/2012 03:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On Sep 25, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> >> Should we have a webdev list? >>> >> >> We discussed using the tags [WWW] last year. >> >> >>> In the past we did had dedicated

Re: Call for comments: Webpage for Listing OpenOffice Consultants

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > see inline below... > > > > > > On 09/26/2012 02:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Donald Whytoc

Re: [DISCUSS][WWW] maybe time for a home page facelift?

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > > > > On 09/25/2012 03:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> > >> On Sep 25, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> > >>> Should we have a webdev list? > >> > >> We discussed using th

Re: mWiki logo design

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:35 AM, imacat wrote: > On 2012/09/27 17:25, Alexandro Colorado said: > > Hi I worked on the updated header of the mWiki site with the current > Apache > > OO Logo including the gull symbols and the correct integration with the > > gradient background. Anyone can help me

Re: mWiki logo design

On 2012/09/27 17:25, Alexandro Colorado said: > Hi I worked on the updated header of the mWiki site with the current Apache > OO Logo including the gull symbols and the correct integration with the > gradient background. Anyone can help me out understand how to commit this > to the mWiki site, AFAI

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

Hi Oliver; - Original Message - ... > > I can confirm that an PRO build (_not_ using configure option > --enable-dbgutil) > with DEBUG=yes breaks in module sw. > To fix this build breaker you need to add link library stl into library swd - > a > similar change as the one which Armin

Re: Some stats and observations on OpenOffice upgrades

On 9/26/2012 11:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Roberto Galoppini wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: In any case, when we do a user survey it might be good to put in some questions targeting OOo 3.3.0 users who have not upgraded. I've heard suggestions in this thread that Ba

Re: build svtools with debug

Hi Ariel and others, > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile ... > > The solution provided by Oliver removed the header, and the use of the > boost smart pointer with it, it helped to go on with the build, just > like Armin's solution; but the build still breaks in sw in a PRO build > with DEBUG=yes. So th

Re: build svtools and sw with debug

Hi, On 27.09.2012 16:11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Pedro, * On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:47:31AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Please note that many people did Windows (and linux and MacOSX) builds just fine with the new boost. There was a problem similar to the one recently reported that wa

Re: [proposed PMC] call for feedback: Are you willing to serve as a PMC member?

Hi, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann schrieb: Hi, this is a call for feedback to the people who are (currently) on the proposed PMC list. Please provide feedback, if you are willing to serve as a PMC member. The current (copied from initial post of thread [1]) proposed PMC list is: Proposed Working Li

Re: Brainstorming: genuine new features to UI

Agreed. Thanks for sharing. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 9/27/12 3:25 PM, Risto Jääskeläinen wrote: > > Hello! > > I send some tips to brainstorming page but some ideas are a bit > > difficult to explain. So I show some videos and link to extension. > > > > First of

Re: build svtools with debug

Hi Pedro, * On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:47:31AM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Please note that many people did Windows (and linux and MacOSX) > builds just fine with the new boost. There was a problem similar to the > one recently reported that was fixed by orw@ but, from what we > discussed, there

Re: Marketing and traveling expenses

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > Hi I was asked about the use of funds regarding marketing events, speakers > and such. I want to know how does Apache manage funds for this operations? > Back in the OOo days, there was a marketing funds that came from donations, > and h

Marketing and traveling expenses

Hi I was asked about the use of funds regarding marketing events, speakers and such. I want to know how does Apache manage funds for this operations? Back in the OOo days, there was a marketing funds that came from donations, and help subsidize traveling and some swag expenses (tshirt, pins, sticke

Re: [proposed PMC] call for feedback: Are you willing to serve as a PMC member?

I'm willing to serve on the PMC. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:37:23AM +0200, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this is a call for feedback to the people who are (currently) on the >> proposed PMC list. >> Please provide feedb

Re: Brainstorming: genuine new features to UI

On 9/27/12 3:25 PM, Risto Jääskeläinen wrote: > Hello! > I send some tips to brainstorming page but some ideas are a bit > difficult to explain. So I show some videos and link to extension. > > First of all UI of Apache OpenOffice has quite few genuine new or > original features. This is OK when u

Re: [PROPOSAL] Reinvigorate extension authors community

On 9/27/12 3:22 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > KG01 - See comments inline. > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Albino B Neto wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> 1) Create a new mailing list: ooo-extensi...@incubator.apache.org (or >>> app...@incubator.apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Reinvigorate extension authors community

KG01 - See comments inline. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Albino B Neto wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > 1) Create a new mailing list: ooo-extensi...@incubator.apache.org (or > > app...@incubator.apache.org if we prefer). I'll assert that the > > curren

Re: Call for comments: Webpage for Listing OpenOffice Consultants

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > On 9/26/2012 4:58 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> Another one of those "larger ecosystem" things I'll be pushing on. >> >> If you recall the legacy OpenOffice.org project had a webpage that >> listed various consultants who provided services for Op

Re: Call for comments: Webpage for Listing OpenOffice Consultants

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > Another one of those "larger ecosystem" things I'll be pushing on. > > > > If you recall the legacy OpenOffice.org project had a webpage that > > listed various consultants who provided s

Re: [proposed PMC] call for feedback: Are you willing to serve as a PMC member?

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:37:23AM +0200, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > this is a call for feedback to the people who are (currently) on the > proposed PMC list. > Please provide feedback, if you are willing to serve as a PMC member. > > The current (copied from initial post of thread [

Re: [UX] [Call for review] Task Prioritization Survey Questions

KG01 - See comments inline. On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Kevin Grignon > wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I've captured a series of questions for inclusion in an upcoming AOO > > survey. The questions are intended to help us understand which

Re: [UX] [Call for review] Task Prioritization Survey Questions

FC, I'm not familiar with Base, so did not capture in this iteration of the survey questions. Would you be able to contribute this section? Thoughts? Regards, Kevin On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:44 PM, RGB ES wrote: > 2012/9/27 F C. Costero > > > Why the complete absence of Base in the survey

Re: [UX] [Call for review] Task Prioritization Survey Questions

2012/9/27 F C. Costero > Why the complete absence of Base in the survey? On the en and es > forums I see a lot more traffic concerning Base than Impress. Here are > the number of topics (in thousands) in the various sub forums for en, > es and fr > Good point! Indeed, Base is at third place on a

Re: Spread the Word of ApacheCon EU 2012 OpenOffice Track?

Hi, On 27.09.2012 12:34, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 27.09.2012 10:39, imacat wrote: Dear all, I was reminded of something: Should we spread the word of ApacheCon EU 2012 OpenOffice track? It's not only an opportuniy to meet our PMC members, committers, but also people who are

Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system

On 25.09.2012 15:21, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi *, On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:56:32PM +0200, Andre Fischer wrote: I put the patch up at http://people.apache.org/~arist/patches/ooo-gbuild-cws-patches.tar.gz Thanks. Do you know whether these patches can be applied without further changes?

Re: Call for comments: Webpage for Listing OpenOffice Consultants

On Sep 26, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Another one of those "larger ecosystem" things I'll be pushing on. > > If you recall the legacy OpenOffice.org project had a webpage that > listed various consultants who provided services for OpenOffice. We > took it down because it was very out

Re: Spread the Word of ApacheCon EU 2012 OpenOffice Track?

Hi. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:39 AM, imacat wrote: > I was reminded of something: Should we spread the word of ApacheCon > EU 2012 OpenOffice track? Yes. I would had already done it. http://www.apachecon.eu/schedule/ Albino

Re: Spread the Word of ApacheCon EU 2012 OpenOffice Track?

Hi, On 27.09.2012 10:39, imacat wrote: Dear all, I was reminded of something: Should we spread the word of ApacheCon EU 2012 OpenOffice track? It's not only an opportuniy to meet our PMC members, committers, but also people who are interested and care. Should we have something more than

Re: [Code] Build problem in svx/source/svdraw/svdtrans

Hi, On 26.09.2012 19:18, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, I have started build with --enable-werror and --enable-dbgutil I get the following errors: c:/AOO_2012_09_git/trunk/main/svx/source/svdraw/svdtrans.cxx(1100) : error C2220: warning treated as error - no 'object' file generated

Re: build svtools with debug

Hi Pedro, On 26.09.2012 20:05, Pedro Giffuni wrote: From: Armin Le Grand ... I builded a lot of other modules in this working copy with debug=t, all worked well except svtools... The question is how long will we be able to live with not being able to debug in svtools on windows? N

mWiki logo design

Hi I worked on the updated header of the mWiki site with the current Apache OO Logo including the gull symbols and the correct integration with the gradient background. Anyone can help me out understand how to commit this to the mWiki site, AFAIK this is not on the svn since is a service. I added a

Re: [proposed PMC] call for feedback: Are you willing to serve as a PMC member?

Hi list, On 26.09.2012 11:37, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, this is a call for feedback to the people who are (currently) on the proposed PMC list. Please provide feedback, if you are willing to serve as a PMC member. The current (copied from initial post of thread [1]) proposed PM

Spread the Word of ApacheCon EU 2012 OpenOffice Track?

Dear all, I was reminded of something: Should we spread the word of ApacheCon EU 2012 OpenOffice track? It's not only an opportuniy to meet our PMC members, committers, but also people who are interested and care. Should we have something more than the announcement from the ASF board? -- B

[call for review]Bug 119655 - [From Symphony] Text Form Field is much smaller and fill color changed to grey when open in AOO 3.4

hi, the field text should be set with the merged the text of all portions. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119655 -- * mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com

Re: [proposed PMC] call for feedback: Are you willing to serve as a PMC member?

On 26.09.2012 11:37, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, this is a call for feedback to the people who are (currently) on the proposed PMC list. Please provide feedback, if you are willing to serve as a PMC member. The current (copied from initial post of thread [1]) proposed PMC list is: P

Re: Some stats and observations on OpenOffice upgrades

On 27/set/2012, at 08:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Roberto Galoppini wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> In any case, when we do a user survey it might be good to put in some >>> questions targeting OOo 3.3.0 users who have not upgraded. I've heard >>> suggestions in