On 06/15/2011 12:45 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Am 15.06.11 00:15, schrieb Ivo Hinkelmann:
Hi Christian,
good idea to remove it, preferred the whole module. It saves us a lot
of build time!
Build time no matters in this case. No user will understand this
argument. And the question is for
On 06/15/2011 07:59 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 06/15/2011 12:45 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Am 15.06.11 00:15, schrieb Ivo Hinkelmann:
Hi Christian,
good idea to remove it, preferred the whole module
also opening up the possibility of
multiple options in terms of packaging up the product to suite
different audiences.
A.
On 6/15/2011 11:50 AM, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
On 06/15/2011 07:59 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic
Hi Sam,
Do you have a concrete proposal?
yes, I have.
First, I do not have any problems with the Apache style of decision
making, lazy consensus sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I like that
style. This fits perfectly to the meritocracy principle.
My understanding is, that this principle is
On 06/20/2011 11:05 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hi,
I moved this and some other lists to the OpenOffice.org wiki:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ApacheMigration
From this page two links point to lists with files that seem to be
compatible with ASL and with files than seem to be
On 06/22/2011 01:38 PM, Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi Mathias,
That would be fine. It is not very urgent, as we won't build OOo on OS/2
soon. We can just leave that single file out. If you want to continue
development of the port, you can add the missing file.
the file is not missing from tree, it
Hi,
some of the old fellows of the OpenOffice.org project may remember the
CC and TeamOpenOffice.org e.V. sponsoring the project. Team OOo is still
committed to contribute to the OpenOffice code base is and is looking
forward to help with the old resources like the Mac Buildbot or the
pootle
Hi,
seems that we lost the box running planet.services.openoffice.org (was
in the Hamburg Oracle building), I also have no more access to backup
data, so it's difficult for me to help migrating,
Martin
Am 07.09.2011 17:54, schrieb eric b:
Hi,
Le 7 sept. 11 à 16:10, Rob Weir a écrit :
I
Am 08.09.2011 01:09, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Hi Dave
This is not a buildbot or samething like that. This is the VCL
Testtool. It's a Tool witch is designed to run Testcase fully
automaticly. It's similar to a User interact with OOo. So it's a Gui
function test.
also login to EIS seems
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:26, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
[...]
I will start working on a consolidation of the Windows Build software
requirements as given on
http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows:
- get rid of dependence on unicows.dll
This
Hi,
- get rid of dependence on instmsiw.exe and instmsia.exe
also this will iirc have some dependencies wrt system requirements, what
do you consider as minimum Windows baseline ? I would be fine with a XP
System SP2,
I would alse be fine with Windows XP SP2 as the minimum Windows
operating
Hi,
Yes, once I have a corresponding patch ready we have to check it on
the different Windows platforms.
Does the current version of Apache OpenOffice allow the creation of
patches and service packs?
I don't think so and maybe we should avoid that kind of complexity at
this stage, so
Hi,
same applies for wiki.services.openoffice.org:
OpenOffice.org Wiki has a problem
*Sorry! This site is experiencing technical difficulties.*
Try waiting a few minutes and reloading.
(Can't contact the database server: Can't connect to local MySQL
server through socket
Hi Shane,
yes, it looks like that I'm able to edit the list of subscribers,
Martin
Am 10.10.2011 18:54, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
On 10/10/2011 12:33 PM, Malte Timmermann wrote:
...snip...
- Which leaves us with 1 common list where we don't have such
restrictive rules, and can continue with our
@ for awareness
On 10/11/2011 6:08 AM, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi Shane,
yes, it looks like that I'm able to edit the list of subscribers,
Martin
Am 10.10.2011 18:54, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
On 10/10/2011 12:33 PM, Malte Timmermann wrote:
...snip...
- Which leaves us with 1 common list where we
Am 13.10.2011 11:18, schrieb Ross Gardler:
a discussion from a position of we don't care will not help
+1, well said,
Martin
Am 13.10.2011 13:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Shane,
done, and sent out a welcome mail, please confirm if this got through to
your list,
Martin
Martin, I did see two notes come through to the ooo-security list
Am 13.10.2011 14:28, schrieb Rob Weir:
My OOo ID is: robweir. That is associated with email address:
robw...@apache.org
ok, should work now,
Martin
Am 14.10.2011 18:22, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Whereas it is in the self-interest of those entities
Hmm, I think it's not that easy. We see Team OpenOffice.org (as the
legal entity behind the old Community Council) still in the
repsonsibilty of an uncredible amount of users which gave their
Am 17.10.2011 20:52, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
If it didn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't happen.
I understand your point, but: Do you think you have all relevant
stakeholders here on the list ? Do we have a common understanding who
these stakeholders are ?
Martin
Hi Ross,
the 2011 budget is based on the numbers of the 2010 budget, so the
increase of the developer budget was caused by the internship program we
executed last year, Juergen Schmidt may elaborate about that details.
In fact, the 2011 budget should change after the changed ownership, but
Hi,
I think the question we should be asking, in addition, is: what makes
us think that the model that OOo used historically might not work even
better?
+1
I think what matters is not just oh it works fine but how do we maximise
benefits.
Indeed, invest into mechanism to boost up the
Am 19.10.2011 17:24, schrieb Ross Gardler:
On 19 October 2011 16:10, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think the question we should be asking, in addition, is: what makes
us think that the model that OOo used historically might not work even
better?
+1
I think
Am 19.10.2011 17:46, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
So - what does your organization do, and how do you want to work with
the AOOo podling?
please understand that I want to reply to this in a thread with another
title ;-)
Martin
Am 20.10.2011 09:41, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
I wrote an email (on 13.10.2011) tovorst...@teamopenoffice.de (your
emai...@openoffice.org in CC) and got no answer. Why? No interest in
communication?
sorry, for not answering yet, our bandwidth is bit overloaded in the
moment, we come back to
Hi,
Wether to stay with OpenOffice or LibreOffice or to migrate to
LibreOffice or to OpenOffce is a question in the recent past often
occurred, by users, by people doing business with OpenOffice, by the
press. The answer I would like to give is that this question is not
really that relevant
Am 20.10.2011 11:02, schrieb Martin Hollmichel:
A call to LibreOffice contributors also to contribute their changes to
Apache as the ASF is the long desired independent foundation for
OpenOffice.org.
of course this should read as a call for all people providing patches,
to do a dual licensing
Am 20.10.2011 14:35, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
This is an interesting idea. The three key questions are:
-- Are there sufficient volunteers in the Apache OpenOffice podling to
actually complete this work in a reasonable time, without impacting
(what I think is) the progress to a new Apache
Am 23.10.2011 04:37, schrieb Rob Weir:
For example, AOOo currently does not have a Pootle
server. Is that an area where TDF this time can help AOOo?
for the records, the old pootle server is lying under my desk, I would
be glad to see that server online again,
Martin
Hi all,
If both parties (ASF, TDF) agree, I could imagine that team openoffice
is willing to provide funds for an independent location, but at the same
time I'm wondering whether such neutral zone is wanted and makes sense ?
What I really don't like to see is a third location for
Hi,
we should ask Andrew directly if a backup of those data is available,
Martin
On 11/15/11 4:09 AM, Xia Zhao wrote:
Wolfram, I am looking for the same asset. If no one knows, I think the
migration work can be done by our QA volunteers. The problem is we
need find the archive asset.
Best
On 11/16/11 1:15 PM, Donald Harbison wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 11/15/11 6:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I have been mulling this over for a long time...
Up to now, we have been reactionary. We have allowed others
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 16, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
On 2011-11-16 3:26 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Martin;
--- On Wed, 11/16/11, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
...
On 11/16/11 6:33 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 16 November
Shane,
the reference to the Apache Project is required here, agreed. We are
reworking the content of the pages to make the message more clear, your
guidance on how to point to Apache OpenOffice project is appreciated here,
Martin
On 11/21/11 2:19 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Note that the
On 11/21/11 4:00 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Martin
Hollmichelmartin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 11/18/11 2:14 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
just stumbled over the about dialog box.
Besides the logo on top + the name, version and build info
On 11/21/11 4:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Martin
Hollmichelmartin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 11/21/11 4:00 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 21, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Martin
Hollmichelmartin.hollmic...@googlemail.com
...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Shane,
the reference to the Apache Project is required here, agreed. We are
reworking the content of the pages to make the message more clear, your
guidance on how to point to Apache OpenOffice
Allen,
in the past the OpenOffice.org release process for micro releases looked
like this:
* propose a tentative release data 3 months behind the release of the
minor version
* propose issues and must haves for the micro release, new features and
new strings (which would cause a new
On 11/26/11 12:44 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
libmspack
I think this becomes obsolete with OpenOffice.org 3.0 release, was used
for downloading some public available, but non OpenSource Fonts,
NSIS
NSIS was a prereqiste for doing packaging download sets for Windows, so
it is not included as
Hi,
sorry for not answering earlier, was on vacation last week,
I will try to put the old pootle server online again within the next
days, so at least the data shouldn't be lost, I keep you updated with
the progress,
Martin
On 12/20/11 10:51 PM, André Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Am 13.12.2011
40 matches
Mail list logo
