Re: OpenOffice graduation: translations of press release

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Andrea

We japanese team have just published its translation.

cf. 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ja/news/graduation.html
   http://www.openoffice.org/ja/news/graduation.html (not yet up)

Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Andrea Pescetti 
Subject: OpenOffice graduation: translations of press release
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:42:54 +0200

> We welcome translations of today's press release about the OpenOffice
> graduation. The English source can be found at
> 
> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_announces35
> 
> Translations are being listed by Rob at
> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/openoffice_graduates_from_the_apache
> 
> German and Italian are already available, Japanese is in progress.
> 
> For other languages, feel free to put a basic HTML file in the
> localized subdirectories of www.openoffice.org (such as
> www.openoffice.org/de for German) or, if you don't have access, send
> the plain text here (not as attachment; in a normal e-mail message)
> and we will upload it. If you are starting to translate, please send a
> brief note ("Reply All" to ooo-dev and ooo-l10n) to avoid overlapping.
> 
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
> 

Re: small patch to AOO

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi again

do you mind applying follwing patch?
without that, even though  apache-commons are specified
in the configure, it does use internal one instead.

$ less files/patch-configure.in 
--- configure.in~   2012-09-21 20:42:22.0 +0900
+++ configure.in2012-09-26 13:32:06.0 +0900
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
 AC_ARG_WITH(system-graphite,
 [  --with-system-graphiteuse graphite library already installed on system
 ],,)
+AC_ARG_WITH(system-apache-commons,
+[  --with-system-apache-commonsuse apache-commons jar files already 
installed on system
+],,)
 AC_ARG_ENABLE(online-update,
 [  --disable-online-update Disables the Online Update feature.
 ],,enable_online_update=yes)



From: Maho NAKATA 
Subject: small patch to AOO
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:28:26 +0900 (JST)

> Hi Pedro and *,
> 
> do you mind applying follwing patch?
> 
> FreeBSD system sed doesn't accept -i itself.
> it should be -i.bak and it looks we should specify
> prior to -r or -e.
> 
> $ less files/patch-sed 
> --- swext/mediawiki/makefile.mk 2012-09-21 20:36:58.0 +0900
> +++ swext/mediawiki/makefile.mk 2012-09-26 16:36:38.0 +0900
> @@ -50,10 +50,10 @@
>  
>  fix_system_commons:
> @echo "Fix Java Class-Path entry for Apache Commons libraries from 
> system."
> -   @$(SED) -r -e "s#(name=\"Class-Path\" 
> value=\").*\"#\1file://$(COMMONS_CODEC_JAR) file://$(COMMONS_LANG_JAR) \
> -file://$(COMMONS_HTTPCLIENT_JAR) file://$(COMMONS_LOGGING_JAR)\"#" -i 
> build.xml
> +   @$(SED) -i.bak -r -e "s#(name=\"Class-Path\" 
> value=\").*\"#\1file://$(COMMONS_CODEC_JAR) file://$(COMMONS_LANG_JAR) \
> +file://$(COMMONS_HTTPCLIENT_JAR) file://$(COMMONS_LOGGING_JAR)\"#" build.xml
> @echo "Unbundle Apache Commons libraries from Mediawiki Presentation 
> extension."
> -   @$(SED) '/file="..commons/d' -i build.xml
> +   @$(SED) -i.bak '/file="..commons/d' build.xml
>  
>  .ELSE
>  @all:
> 
> Thanks
>  Nakata Maho

small patch to AOO

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro and *,

do you mind applying follwing patch?

FreeBSD system sed doesn't accept -i itself.
it should be -i.bak and it looks we should specify
prior to -r or -e.

$ less files/patch-sed 
--- swext/mediawiki/makefile.mk 2012-09-21 20:36:58.0 +0900
+++ swext/mediawiki/makefile.mk 2012-09-26 16:36:38.0 +0900
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@
 
 fix_system_commons:
@echo "Fix Java Class-Path entry for Apache Commons libraries from 
system."
-   @$(SED) -r -e "s#(name=\"Class-Path\" 
value=\").*\"#\1file://$(COMMONS_CODEC_JAR) file://$(COMMONS_LANG_JAR) \
-file://$(COMMONS_HTTPCLIENT_JAR) file://$(COMMONS_LOGGING_JAR)\"#" -i build.xml
+   @$(SED) -i.bak -r -e "s#(name=\"Class-Path\" 
value=\").*\"#\1file://$(COMMONS_CODEC_JAR) file://$(COMMONS_LANG_JAR) \
+file://$(COMMONS_HTTPCLIENT_JAR) file://$(COMMONS_LOGGING_JAR)\"#" build.xml
@echo "Unbundle Apache Commons libraries from Mediawiki Presentation 
extension."
-   @$(SED) '/file="..commons/d' -i build.xml
+   @$(SED) -i.bak '/file="..commons/d' build.xml
 
 .ELSE
 @all:

Thanks
 Nakata Maho

do we need openoffice-3-rc port for FreeBSD?

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro and *

As branche AOO340 for Apache OpenOffice exists, so do we need
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-RC
again? we need it for smooth integration for 3.4.2 etc.
Still I'm delaying because difference between 3.4.1 and 3.4.0
(in terms of building; not by playing Angry Birds).

Currently we have:
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel (just head)
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3 (waiting for update to 3.4.1)

Thanks,
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: What to say in AOO 3.4.1 release announcement about the ports? (BSD, Solaris, OS/2)?

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Marcus,
- FreeBSD by  Maho Nakata / Pedro Giffuni
thanks
Nakata Maho
From: "Marcus (OOo)" 
Subject: Re: What to say in AOO 3.4.1 release announcement about the ports? 
(BSD, Solaris, OS/2)?
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:34:53 +0200

> Am 08/18/2012 04:38 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>> Am 08/18/2012 04:19 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Marcus (OOo)
>>> wrote:
>>>> Am 08/18/2012 02:48 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Marcus (OOo)
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 08/18/2012 06:38 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 08/02/2012 02:12 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:37 PM, drew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 18:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:24 PM, drew
>>>>>>>>>>> jensen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:09 -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kay;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did some basic update to the FreeBSD porting site sometime
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/porting/freebsd/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The site doesn't seem linked from the top-level porting site
>>>>>>>>>>>>> though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would prefer to spend my time on the code rather than on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement, however feel free to mention explicitly the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> FreeBSD
>>>>>>>>>>>>> port.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to make it clear: we still have some cleanup to do but the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> port is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fully operational and FreeBSD users are fully aware that it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on FreeBSD releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pedro.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then for BSD it should be enough to just point to the page you
>>>>>>>>>>>> updated,
>>>>>>>>>>>> yes?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO, we should consolidate all the porting links onto that one
>>>>>>>>>>> page.
>>>>>>>>>>> That way it gives one clear place to link to in the announcement,
>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>> also a single place we can link to from other places in the
>>>>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>>>> For example, we should probably eventually have a link to the
>>>>>>>>>>> porting
>>>>>>>>>>> page from the download page.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Rob
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hmmm - well, I'm just getting 

Re: more 3.4.1 questions...supported OSes

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi, I can provide release builds to Apache community.
and how I should proceed?

Nakata Maho

2012/7/19 Pedro Giffuni 

> - Original Message -
>
> ...
> >
> > OK, more from me on the upcoming release.
> >
> > Will ee providing an official FreeBSD and OS/2 release for 3.4.1?
> >
> > We had discussed this a bit in the past, but I haven't seen anything
> > recently.
> >
>
> We (actually Maho@) do regular builds but we have no plans to
> make releases through Apache infrastructure.
>
> Release notes can of course mention that FreeBSD is supported if
> you wish. We should also make some reference to the Solaris
> port for this release.
>
> best regards,
>
> Pedro.
>



-- 
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG:
http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: Patch to configure, --enable-category-b and --without-fonts contradicts

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Andre,

> read this thread and have already checked in your patch.  I stated you
> as patch author, so I hope that you don't mind too much.
Thanks I don't mind ;-)
> SVN revision is 1358058.

Thanks a lot!

Best
 Nakata Maho

From: Andre Fischer 
Subject: Re: Patch to configure, --enable-category-b and --without-fonts 
contradicts
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 09:27:37 +0200

> On 06.07.2012 03:35, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hi Andre Fisher,
>> (Cc: pfg@)
>>
>> I have been porting AOO to FreeBSD and I pass the configure
>> to --enable-category-b and --without-fonts. This contradicts and thus
>> build fails at instsetoo_native.
>>
>> Patch is here:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-configure?rev=1.3;content-type=text%2Fplain
>>
>> The reason for that is if we set --enable-category-b, then it
>> automatically
>> activates WITH_CATB_FONTS (SCPDEFS="$SCPDEFS -DWITH_CATB_FONTS"),
>> and cannot be disabled by --without-fonts.
>>
>> However, by --without-fonts, WITH_CATB_FONTS=NO is set but scp2
>> project
>> assumes WITH_CATB_FONTS.
> 
> This seems to be a related but different problem.  I will check that.
> 
>>
>> I think if --without-fonts is set, SCPDEFS="$SCPDEFS
>> -DWITH_CATB_FONTS" should be set.
>>
>> What do you think? Can I commit the patch?
> 
> Pedro has added the patch already to the issue.  I saw that before I
> read this thread and have already checked in your patch.  I stated you
> as patch author, so I hope that you don't mind too much.
> 
> SVN revision is 1358058.
> 
> Thanks for the patch,
> Andre
> 
>> Thanks,
>> -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO
>> -- http://ja.openoffice.org/
>> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG:
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 

Patch to configure, --enable-category-b and --without-fonts contradicts

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Andre Fisher,
(Cc: pfg@)

I have been porting AOO to FreeBSD and I pass the configure
to --enable-category-b and --without-fonts. This contradicts and thus 
build fails at instsetoo_native.

Patch is here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-configure?rev=1.3;content-type=text%2Fplain

The reason for that is if we set --enable-category-b, then it automatically
activates WITH_CATB_FONTS (SCPDEFS="$SCPDEFS -DWITH_CATB_FONTS"), 
and cannot be disabled by --without-fonts.

However, by --without-fonts, WITH_CATB_FONTS=NO is set but scp2 project
assumes WITH_CATB_FONTS.

I think if --without-fonts is set, SCPDEFS="$SCPDEFS -DWITH_CATB_FONTS" should 
be set.

What do you think? Can I commit the patch?
Thanks,
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

 

Re: Volunteers needed: To update NL download pages later this week

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

To take responsibility, wiki page has been updated. 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Distribution+Tasks

>> Manually update the downloads from the Japanese NL homepage

could you please tell me which and how to update web page?

http://www.openoffice.org/ja/ ?
http://ja.openoffice.org/ ? 
but how?

I can checkout svn 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/
but I couldn't find ...

thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Maho NAKATA 
Subject: Re: Volunteers needed: To update NL download pages later this week
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 14:48:26 +0900 (JST)

> Hi
> 
>> Manually update the downloads from the Japanese NL homepage
> I'll update Japanese NL page.
> 
> thanks
>  Nakata Maho
> 
> From: Rob Weir 
> Subject: Volunteers needed: To update NL download pages later this week
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:41:29 -0400
> 
>> The following tasks are on the wiki and need owners:
>> 
>> 
>> Manually update the downloads from the Arabic NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Czech NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the German NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Spanish NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the French NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Hungarian NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Galacian NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Italian NL homepage and
>> subpages (pescetti)
>> Manually update the downloads from the Japanese NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Dutch NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Brazilian NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Russian NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Simplified Chinese NL homepage
>> Manually update the downloads from the Traditional Chinese NL homepage
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Distribution+Tasks
>> 
>> Only one of them has an owner (Thanks, Andrea!)
>> 
>> What needs to be done?
>> 
>> We need someone to review these NL pages and identify what needs to be
>> changed to support the AOO 3..4 release.
>> 
>> Changes to consider:
>> 
>> 1) Branding changes (OpenOffice.org -> Apache OpenOffice)
>> 
>> 2) Updates to download location,  for the 3.4 releases instead of the
>> 3.3 release
>> 
>> 3) References to the old LGPL license need to be changed to Apache 2.0 
>> License
>> 
>> 4) References to old NLC email addresses, marketing leads, etc., need
>> to be replaced by the new Apache email lists.
>> 
>> 5) Other similar changes.
>> 
>> You don't need to do a complete rewrite of the pages.  But we should
>> "refresh" the page with information on the AOO 3.4 release.
>> 
>> Timeline looks like this:
>> 
>> -- Wednesday May 2nd -- Vote ends on approving the 3.4 release
>> 
>> -- Thursday-Friday -- Update the mirrors with the release, test the
>> new download websites.
>> 
>> -- Over the weekend, additional website updates and testing
>> 
>> -- Monday or Tuesday, if everything is working well, then we make
>> public announcement
>> 
>> 
>> So ideally we would have the NL website updates done at the end of
>> this week.   However, we should not make them be live on the
>> production server until after the mirrors are populated.  Maybe
>> easiest way to coordinate is to submit patches for the changes into
>> BZ?
>> 
>> Any other ideas?
>> 
>> Any volunteers?
>> 
>> -Rob
>> 

Re: Volunteers needed: To update NL download pages later this week

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

> Manually update the downloads from the Japanese NL homepage
I'll update Japanese NL page.

thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Volunteers needed: To update NL download pages later this week
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:41:29 -0400

> The following tasks are on the wiki and need owners:
> 
> 
> Manually update the downloads from the Arabic NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Czech NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the German NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Spanish NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the French NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Hungarian NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Galacian NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Italian NL homepage and
> subpages (pescetti)
> Manually update the downloads from the Japanese NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Dutch NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Brazilian NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Russian NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Simplified Chinese NL homepage
> Manually update the downloads from the Traditional Chinese NL homepage
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Distribution+Tasks
> 
> Only one of them has an owner (Thanks, Andrea!)
> 
> What needs to be done?
> 
> We need someone to review these NL pages and identify what needs to be
> changed to support the AOO 3..4 release.
> 
> Changes to consider:
> 
> 1) Branding changes (OpenOffice.org -> Apache OpenOffice)
> 
> 2) Updates to download location,  for the 3.4 releases instead of the
> 3.3 release
> 
> 3) References to the old LGPL license need to be changed to Apache 2.0 License
> 
> 4) References to old NLC email addresses, marketing leads, etc., need
> to be replaced by the new Apache email lists.
> 
> 5) Other similar changes.
> 
> You don't need to do a complete rewrite of the pages.  But we should
> "refresh" the page with information on the AOO 3.4 release.
> 
> Timeline looks like this:
> 
> -- Wednesday May 2nd -- Vote ends on approving the 3.4 release
> 
> -- Thursday-Friday -- Update the mirrors with the release, test the
> new download websites.
> 
> -- Over the weekend, additional website updates and testing
> 
> -- Monday or Tuesday, if everything is working well, then we make
> public announcement
> 
> 
> So ideally we would have the NL website updates done at the end of
> this week.   However, we should not make them be live on the
> production server until after the mirrors are populated.  Maybe
> easiest way to coordinate is to submit patches for the changes into
> BZ?
> 
> Any other ideas?
> 
> Any volunteers?
> 
> -Rob
> 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

[Maho NAKATA]

congratulations!

2012/5/2 Jürgen Schmidt 

> The vote period for releasing Apache OpenOffice (incubator) RC1  has
> concluded.
>
> The ballot passed.
>
> VOTE TALLY
>
> +1:
>
> IPMC members:
>
> +1 Marvin Humphrey
> +1 Dave Fisher
> +1 Jim Jagielski
>
> For reference see also the vote thread on ooo-dev
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-**
> dev/201204.mbox/%3C4F9A452A.**9000707%40googlemail.com%3E
>
>
> Thank you for your support
>
> Juergen
>
>
>

3.4 source and svn 1327774

[Maho NAKATA]

http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo34-rc/rc1/src/aoo-3.4.0-incubating-src.tar.bz2
and my svn checkout 1327774 are slightly different;

somehow following moz/zipped/makefile.mk file is removed.

just fyi...


diff -urN moz/zipped/makefile.mk moz/zipped/makefile.mk
--- moz/zipped/makefile.mk  1970-01-01 09:00:00.0 +0900
+++ moz/zipped/makefile.mk  2012-04-25 16:49:07.0 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+#**
+#  
+#  Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+#  or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+#  distributed with this work for additional information
+#  regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+#  to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+#  "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+#  with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#  
+#http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#  
+#  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+#  software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+#  "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+#  KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+#  specific language governing permissions and limitations
+#  under the License.
+#  
+#**
+
+
+
+PRJ=..
+
+PRJNAME=moz
+TARGET=moz_unzip
+
+# --- Settings -
+
+.INCLUDE :  settings.mk
+
+# --- Files 
+
+.IF "$(PREBUILD_MOZAB)" == "" || "$(SYSTEM_MOZILLA)" == "YES" || 
"$(WITH_MOZILLA)" == "NO"
+
+dummy:
+   @echo "No need to unpack the prebuilt mozab packages"
+
+.ELSE # unpack mozab zips
+.INCLUDE :  target.mk
+
+.IF "$(BUILD_MOZAB)"=="TRUE"
+ALLTAR:
+   @echo "Does not need build mozab zipped!"
+.ELSE
+ALLTAR: \
+   $(MISC)$/unpacked_$(TARGET)_inc \
+   $(MISC)$/unpacked_$(TARGET)_lib \
+   $(BIN)$/mozruntime.zip \
+   $(MISC)$/replace_old_nss_libs
+.ENDIF
+.IF "$(GUI)" == "UNX"
+
+$(MISC)$/unpacked_%_lib : $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)lib.zip 
'$(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)runtime.zip'
+   unzip -o -d $(LB) $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)lib.zip && unzip -o -d $(LB) 
$(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)runtime.zip && $(TOUCH) $@
+   chmod -R 775 $(LB)
+
+$(MISC)$/unpacked_%_inc : $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)inc.zip
+   unzip -o -d $(INCCOM) $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)inc.zip && $(TOUCH)  $@
+   chmod -R 775 $(INCCOM)
+
+.ELSE
+
+$(MISC)$/unpacked_$(TARGET)_lib : $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)lib.zip
+   unzip -o -d $(LB) $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)lib.zip && \
+   $(TOUCH) $@
+
+$(MISC)$/unpacked_$(TARGET)_inc : $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)inc.zip
+   unzip -o -d $(INCCOM) $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)inc.zip && $(TOUCH)  $@
+
+.ENDIF
+
+$(BIN)$/mozruntime%zip : $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)runtime.zip
+   $(COPY) $(OS)$(COM)$(CPU)runtime.zip $(BIN)$/mozruntime.zip
+
+# add alternative rules for universal binary moz-zips
+.IF "$(GUIBASE)" == "aqua"
+$(MISC)$/unpacked_%_lib : $(OS)$(COM)UBlib.zip '$(OS)$(COM)UBruntime.zip'
+   unzip -o -d $(LB) $(OS)$(COM)UBlib.zip && unzip -o -d $(LB) 
$(OS)$(COM)UBruntime.zip && $(TOUCH) $@
+   chmod -R 775 $(LB)
+  
+$(MISC)$/unpacked_%_inc : $(OS)$(COM)UBinc.zip
+   unzip -o -d $(INCCOM) $(OS)$(COM)UBinc.zip && $(TOUCH)  $@
+   chmod -R 775 $(INCCOM)
+
+$(BIN)$/mozruntime%zip : $(OS)$(COM)UBruntime.zip
+   $(COPY) $(OS)$(COM)UBruntime.zip $(BIN)$/mozruntime.zip
+
+.ENDIF # "$(GUIBASE)"=="aqua"
+
+LIBLIST =
+BIN_RUNTIMELIST = 
+NSS_INCLUDE_LIST =
+NSS_MODULE_RUNTIME_LIST =
+.IF "$(ENABLE_NSS_MODULE)"=="YES"
+# The prebuilt moz files include all the old NSS stuff from moz and not the new
+# NSS libs, headers, etc, from the separate nss module. If we use the nss 
module
+# then we must take care not to deliver the old NSS stuff from the "prebuilts"
+.IF "$(GUI)" == "WNT"
+FREEBL_LIB_OLD=freebl3
+.ELSE # "$(GUI)" == "WNT"
+.IF "$(OS)$(CPUNAME)" == "SOLARISSPARC"
+FREEBL_LIB_OLD=freebl_32fpu_3
+.ELSE # "$(OS)$(CPUNAME)" == "SOLARISSPARC"
+FREEBL_LIB_OLD=freebl3
+.ENDIF # "$(OS)$(CPUNAME)" == "SOLARISSPARC"
+.ENDIF # "$(GUI)" == "WNT"
+
+BIN_RUNTIMELIST= \
+$(FREEBL_LIB_OLD) \
+nspr4 \
+plc4 \
+plds4 \
+nss3 \
+ssl3 \
+softokn3 \
+smime3
+
+.IF "$(GUI)"=="WNT"
+.IF "$(COM)"=="GCC"
+LIBLIST= \
+libnspr4.a \
+libnss3.a \
+libsmime3.a \
+libplc4.a \
+libplds4.a \
+libssl3.a
+
+.ELSE
+LIBLIST= \
+nspr4.lib \
+plc4.lib \
+plds4.lib \
+nss3.lib \
+ssl3.lib\
+smime3.lib
+.ENDIF
+.ELSE   #"$(GUI)"=="WNT"
+LIBLIST= \
+lib$(FREEBL_LIB_OLD)$(DLLPOST) \
+libnspr4$(DLLPOST) \
+libsoftokn3$(DLLPOST) \
+libplc4$(DLLPOST) \
+libplds4$(DLLPOST) \
+libnss3$(DLLPOST) \
+libssl3$(DLLPOST) \
+libsmime3$(DLLPOST)
+
+.ENDIF # .IF "$(GUI)"=="WNT"
+
+
+# On MacOS no include dirs nspr and nss exists in the prebuilt zip, no need to 
remove the

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

also
+1  Kazunaro Hirano - PPMC
->
+1  Kazunari Hirano - PPMC

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Jurgen,

> +1  Maho Nakato - PPMC
->
> +1  Maho Nakata - PPMC

thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Jürgen Schmidt 
Subject: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:05:14 +0800

> Hi,
> 
> the preliminary vote result is identical with the final vote
> result. We had a further +1 (PPMC) vote on ooo-private but that can't
> be counted here.
> 
> The ballot result was +34 including one IPMC member binding +1, 22 +1
> votes fro PPMC members, one +1 from a committer, 8 +1 votes from
> community members and one PPMC abstentions (0).  One -1 non-binding
> ballot were cast related the Finish translation that will be now not
> part of the release. Means we will not release a Finnish localized
> binary package.
> 
> VOTE TALLY
> 
> +1  Dave Fisher - IPMC (binding)
> 
> 0   Dennis E. Hamilton (orcmid)
> 
> +1  Pedro Giffuni - PPMC
> +1  Hagar Delest - PPMC
> +1  Ian Lynch - PPMC
> +1  Rob Weir - PPMC
> +1  RGB ES - PPMC
> +1  Zoltán Reizinger - PPMC
> +1  Donald Harbison - PPMC
> +1  Kay Schenk - PPMC
> +1  Armin Le Grand - PPMC
> +1  Herbert Duerr - PPMC
> +1  Carl Marcum - PPMC
> +1  Marcus Lange - PPMC
> +1  Regina Henschel - PPMC
> +1  Andrew Rist - PPMC
> +1  Andrea Pescetti - PPMC
> +1  Ariel Constenla-Haile - PPMC
> +1  Juergen Schmidt - PPMC
> +1  Oliver Rainer Wittmann - PPMC
> +1  Kazunaro Hirano - PPMC
> +1  Maho Nakato - PPMC
> +1  Andre Fischer - PPMC
> +1  Eric Bachard - PPMC
> +1  Raphael Bircher - PPMC
> +1  Drew Jensen - PPMC
> +1 Chritoph Jopp - PPMC
> 
> +1  Yuri Dario -Committer
> 
> +1  Larry Gusaas
> +1  Shen Feng Liu
> +1  Rory O'Farrell
> +1  Chao Huang
> +1  Albino Biasutti Neto
> +1  Peng Chen
> +1  Ying Sun
> +1  ZuoJun Chen
> 
> 
> -1  Risto Jääskeläinen, only for Finnish translation
> 
> 
> 35   Votes +1
>  1   Votes  0
>  1   Votes -1
> 

Build problem of aoo-3.4.0-incubating-src.tar.bz2

[Maho NAKATA]

hi

I have just trying to build aoo-3.4.0-incubating-src.tar.bz2. However, it seems 
to have
a minor bug.

when I trying to build...

build -- version: 275224
Ambiguous paths for module l10n: 
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.0/main/l10n
 and 
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.0/extras/l10n
 at 
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.0/main/solenv/bin/build.pl
 line 244

there are two 'l10n' directories. Can I remove aoo-3.4.0/main/l10n since it 
contains just a two shell script
$ ls work/aoo-3.4.0/main/l10n/source/
fix_l10n.sh prepare_l10n.sh

Moreover, vanilla checkout from svn doesn't contain main/l10n/.

thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

[Maho NAKATA]

BTW:

FreeBSD ports tree has been updated to 3.4rc1.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/Makefile?rev=1.531;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup

and also I'm heading for openoffice-3 port.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167305
thanks
 Nakaa Maho

From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" 
Subject: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:01:15 -0700

> What does release-candidate voting at the Apache OpenOffice podling mean?
> 
> Is it is just an assessment of support/sentiment, or is there more involved?
> 
> The ballot has this phrasing:
> 
> "But we invite all people to vote (non-binding) on this RC. We would like 
>  to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project 
>  members.
> 
>  +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
>   0 Don't care
>  -1 Do not release this package because..."
> 
> I suggest that there are binding PPMC votes on this ballot.  They are binding 
> with respect to whether or not the release candidate will be submitted to the 
> Incubator PMC for its consideration.
> 
> While non-PPMC/-committer participants can of course vote their sentiment, 
> there is something more valuable to be achieved in this process.
> 
> Committers and PPMC members are expected to cast informed ballots.  If any 
> contributor casts a "-1", it should be accompanied by a clear, specific 
> explanation and suggestion of actions that would cure the situation.
> 
> Here is something that all project contributors can participate in, with or 
> without voting:
> 
> PARTICIPATE IN QUALITY-ASSURANCE COVERAGE OF THE CANDIDATE
> 
> It is valuable to download the source code and confirm that binaries can be 
> built.
> 
> It is valuable to download the binaries and confirm that they install 
> properly under a variety of conditions.
> 
> It is especially valuable to verify functions and operations that are 
> important to you as an user of OpenOffice.org who desires to use Apache 
> OpenOffice 3.4 as an upgrade.  If this is your first try at testing a release 
> in any way, all the better.  
> 
> It is also useful to confirm whether the same problem reported by someone 
> else is also occurring for others.  
> 
> Rather than have many people conduct and confirm the same successes, it is 
> useful for contributors to explore areas not previously reported on.  It is 
> particularly valuable to examine areas where there have been difficulties in 
> the past to see if there is any change: improvement or degradation.
> 
> Lily Zhao, Oliver-Rainer Wittman, and others have created wiki pages that can 
> be used to help people organize their QA investigations and reports.
> 
> There is a general page on the Apache OpenOffice Community Wiki with a table 
> for addition of results:
> .
>   This is for general trials at installation and inspection of functions, 
> rather than specific test cases.  To add to this table, a Community Wiki 
> registration is required.
> 
> (Note: please use the page above for casual test reports, including of 
> installation failures, rather than adding comments to the Release Candidate 
> and Developer Snapshot pages.  Help us collect these in a small number of 
> places.)
> 
> Test cases are defined on the OpenOffice.org Wiki at
> .  You can add or 
> update test cases.  Registration on the OpenOffice.org Wiki (different than 
> the Community Wiki) is required to update these pages.
> 
> Test results can be added on the OpenOffice.org Wiki at 
> .  Registration on 
> the OpenOffice.org Wiki is required.  Editing is the same as for any 
> MediaWiki installation, just like Wikipedia.
> 
> 
> There is an overall Release-QA-Plan for background:
> .
> 
>  - Dennis
> 
> BACKGROUND CONSIDERATIONS
> -
> 
> WHAT MAKES A RELEASE CANDIDATE ELIGIBLE TO BE A RELEASE?
> 
> When a release candidate is voted on by the IPMC, it is *not* a statement 
> about the quality of the release with regard to its function and reliability. 
>  It is an assessment of specific measures releasable code must satisfy, 
> regardless of its function.  There is no direct relationship to quality of 
> the release as usable software.  The IPMC determination is more about the 
> completeness of the source, the IP clearance of the source code, and that 
> everything necessary to build run-time versions of the code is provided.  The 
> binaries, the most important part for users, are assessed mainly for having 
> been built from the released source, being certified as such by the release 
> manager(s), and satisfaction certain additional requirements concerning 
> dependencies, notices, and honoring of licens

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi, me too.

+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)


From: ZuoJun Chen 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:35:22 +0800

> Hi, +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) , build &
> use RC in my daily work.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 2012/4/21 Jürgen Schmidt 
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating). This will be the first incubator release for
>> Apache OpenOffice and a key milestone to continue the success of
>> OpenOffice.org.
>>
>>
>> This release candidate provides the following important key changes
>> compared to former OpenOffice releases:
>> (1) Code clean up to remove all copyleft components and external
>> dependencies
>> (2) Reworked or introduced LICENSE and NOTICE file to reflect and document
>> the used licenses of the code itself as well as of external 3rd party
>> libraries
>> (3) MD5, SHA1, SHA512 hashes and GPG signatures for all of artifacts
>>
>> For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/**OOOUSERS/aoo-34-release-notes.**html
>> .
>>
>> The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary
>> releases for 16 languages) and further information how to verify and review
>> Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) can be found on the following wiki page:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**
>> AOO+3.4+%28incubating%29+**Release+Candidate
>>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4
>> (incubating).
>>
>> The vote starts now and will be open until:
>>
>>   UTC midnight Wednesday, 25 April: 2012-04-25 24:00 UTC.
>>
>> After the vote of the PPMC the vote will start on
>> gene...@incubtor.apache.org mailing and will be open for further 72 hours.
>> But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like
>> to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project
>> members.
>>
>>   [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating)
>>   [ ]  0 Don't care
>>   [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>>

fetch_tarball.sh on FreeBSD

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro,

Do you know some fix for following error message?

/work/a/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/fetch_tarballs.sh: line 
54: break: only meaningful in a `for', `while', or `until' loop

It looks even though the error, not harm.

thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

with internal graphite build fails on FreeBSD.

[Maho NAKATA]

h:73: error: '_STL::wstring' has not been declared
../src/segment/FontCache.h:89: error: '_STL::wstring' has not been declared
In file included from ../src/segment/Main.h:153,
 from ../src/font/Font.cpp:18:
../include/graphite/Font.h:392: error: '_STL::wstring' has not been declared
In file included from ../src/segment/Main.h:155,
 from ../src/font/Font.cpp:18:
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:214: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:218: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:247: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:387: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:388: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:389: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:390: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:394: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:397: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:399: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:401: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:402: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
../src/segment/GrEngine.h:405: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does not 
name a type
In file included from ../src/segment/Main.h:156,
 from ../src/font/Font.cpp:18:
../src/segment/FontFace.h:79: error: '_STL::wstring' has not been declared
../src/segment/FontFace.h:83: error: '_STL::wstring' has not been declared
../src/segment/FontFace.h: In destructor 'gr3ooo::FontFace::~FontFace()':
../src/segment/FontFace.h:58: error: 'class gr3ooo::GrEngine' has no member 
named 'FaceName'
In file included from ../src/segment/Main.h:157,
 from ../src/font/Font.cpp:18:
../include/graphite/Segment.h: At global scope:
../include/graphite/Segment.h:206: error: '_STL::wstring' has not been declared
../include/graphite/Segment.h:206: error: '_STL::wstring' has not been declared
../src/font/Font.cpp: In member function 'void 
gr3ooo::Font::initialiseFontFace(bool)':
../src/font/Font.cpp:114: error: 'wstring' is not a member of '_STL'
../src/font/Font.cpp:114: error: expected `;' before 'stuFaceName'
../src/font/Font.cpp:117: error: 'stuFaceName' was not declared in this scope
../src/font/Font.cpp: At global scope:
../src/font/Font.cpp:139: error: variable or field 'UniqueCacheInfo' declared 
void
../src/font/Font.cpp:139: error: 'wstring' is not a member of '_STL'
../src/font/Font.cpp:139: error: 'stuFace' was not declared in this scope
../src/font/Font.cpp:139: error: expected primary-expression before 'bool'
../src/font/Font.cpp:139: error: expected primary-expression before 'bool'
../src/font/Font.cpp:947: error: expected `}' at end of input
gmake[1]: *** [Font.lo] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory 
`/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/graphite/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/silgraphite-2.3.1/engine/src'
gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
dmake:  Error code 2, while making 
'./unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_graphite'
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/graphite


If you know something, it would be better.

Note: we have a workaround patch for that:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-graphite
--- graphite/graphite-2.3.1.patch   2012-02-19 18:21:39.0 +0900
+++ graphite/graphite-2.3.1.patch   2012-02-20 08:13:43.0 +0900
@@ -2394,3 +2394,14 @@
  {
bool fRet = true;
  
+--- misc/silgraphite-2.3.1/engine/include/graphite/GrFeature.h 2009-01-22 
07:36:40.0 +0900
 misc/build/silgraphite-2.3.1/engine/include/graphite/GrFeature.h  
2012-02-20 08:09:33.0 +0900
+@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
+ 
+ //:End Ignore
+ 
++#define wstring basic_string //quick dirty hack for not finding 
_STL::wstring
++
+ #include "GrAppData.h"
+ 
+ namespace gr

This e-mail was requested by pfg@.

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho



From: Maho N

Re: --with-system-graphite fails on FreeBSD.

[Maho NAKATA]

Sorry... I should report without --with-system-graphite...
I'll post again, soon.

Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Maho NAKATA 
Subject: --with-system-graphite fails on FreeBSD.
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:36:36 +0900 (JST)

> Hi hdu,
> Just for your info. 
> 
> with svn 1308242 and with --with-system-graphite,
> build fails on FreeBSD at vcl project with following build error. pfg and I 
> tested
> several patches to fix, but still in vain. 
> 
> [maho@ligeti8amd64 
> /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl]$
>  gmake -sr[ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libvcl.so
> [ build CXX ] vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/memory:53,
>  from 
> /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl/preextstl.h:48,
>  from 
> /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/inc/graphite_features.hxx:28,
>  from 
> /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache.cxx:40:
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: template argument 2 is 
> invalid
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: expected unqualified-id 
> before '>' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: template argument 2 is 
> invalid
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: expected unqualified-id 
> before '>' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: template declaration of 
> 'typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_if::__value, 
> _CharT*>::__type std::__copy_aux'
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
> primary-expression before '>' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
> primary-expression before ',' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
> primary-expression before '>' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
> primary-expression before ',' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected 
> primary-expression before '*' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected 
> primary-expression before ')' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: template argument 2 is 
> invalid
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: expected unqualified-id 
> before '>' token
> gmake: *** 
> [/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/workdir/CxxObject/vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache.o]
>  エラー 1
> 
> Best regards,
>  Nakata Maho
> 

--with-system-graphite fails on FreeBSD.

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi hdu,
Just for your info. 

with svn 1308242 and with --with-system-graphite,
build fails on FreeBSD at vcl project with following build error. pfg and I 
tested
several patches to fix, but still in vain. 

[maho@ligeti8amd64 
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl]$
 gmake -sr[ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libvcl.so
[ build CXX ] vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/memory:53,
 from 
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl/preextstl.h:48,
 from 
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/inc/graphite_features.hxx:28,
 from 
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache.cxx:40:
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was 
not declared in this scope
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: template argument 2 is 
invalid
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: expected unqualified-id 
before '>' token
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was 
not declared in this scope
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: template argument 2 is 
invalid
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: expected unqualified-id 
before '>' token
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: template declaration of 
'typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_if::__value, _CharT*>::__type 
std::__copy_aux'
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' was 
not declared in this scope
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
primary-expression before '>' token
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
primary-expression before ',' token
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' was 
not declared in this scope
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
primary-expression before '>' token
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
primary-expression before ',' token
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected 
primary-expression before '*' token
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected 
primary-expression before ')' token
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' was 
not declared in this scope
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: template argument 2 is 
invalid
/usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: expected unqualified-id 
before '>' token
gmake: *** 
[/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/workdir/CxxObject/vcl/source/glyphs/glyphcache.o]
 エラー 1

Best regards,
 Nakata Maho

Re: Apache OpenOffice Quality Assurance (QA) mailing list

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

We have created the QA mailing list. Please feel free to talk,
and please do not consider the topics I listed are very serious;
every topic is connected to other topics because we are working
on Apache OpenOffice ;-)

Let's have fun.

From: Maho NAKATA 
Subject: Apache OpenOffice Quality Assurance (QA) mailing list
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:31:51 +0900 (JST)

> Hi all,
> 
> This is the Quality Assurance (QA) mailing list of Apache OpenOffice.
> 
> Topics are:
> 1. Bug reports.
> 2. Quality assurance for release candidate to release.
> 3. Beta tests: result reports, discussion and announcement, etc.
> 4. Dev snapshot: results reports, discussion and announcement, etc.
> 5. Manual tests: discussions on test cases, and reports.
> 6. Automatic tests: discussions on test cases, testtools and reports.
> 7. Other topics which are appropriate to treat on this mailing list.
> 
> The initial moderators are:
> NAKATA Maho 
> xia zhao 
> Rob Weir 
> 
> Archives:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-qa/
> .
> 
> Issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4625
> .
> 
> Best regards,
>  Nakata Maho
> 

Created : Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi, Lily, Rob, and Ram,

The QA mailing list has been created. Congratulations.
We should update
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/mailing-lists.html
.
How I can do?
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: "Tony Stevenson (Closed) (JIRA)" 
Subject: [jira] [Closed] (INFRA-4625) Create ooo-qa mailing list for Apache 
OpenOffice Podling
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 18:42:27 + (UTC)

> 
>  [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>  ]
> 
> Tony Stevenson closed INFRA-4625.
> -
> 
> Resolution: Fixed
>   Assignee: Tony Stevenson
> 
> This list has been created and should be live at 19:05 (UTC) 
> 
>> Create ooo-qa mailing list for Apache OpenOffice Podling
>> 
>>
>> Key: INFRA-4625
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4625
>> Project: Infrastructure
>>  Issue Type: Task
>>  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>>  Components: Mailing Lists
>>Reporter: NAKATA Maho
>>        Assignee: Tony Stevenson
>>
>> Name of the list:
>> ooo...@incubator.apache.org
>> Moderators:
>> 1. Maho Nakata, m...@apache.org 
>> 2. xia zhao, lilyzh...@gmail.com
>> 3. Rob Weir, robw...@apache.org
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA 
> administrators: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> 
> 
> 

From: Maho NAKATA 
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:36:48 +0900 (JST)

> Hi, All, Lily, Ram, and Rob,
> 
> Since no strong objections so I have just created a issue.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4625
> 
> Thanks,
>  Nakata Maho
> 
> From: Rob Weir 
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list
> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:26:37 -0400
> 
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Maho NAKATA  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Lily
>>>
>>> > Thanks for creating QA list, this will help us to monitor and track QA
>>>
>>> not yet. We should wait at least 2 weeks for lazy consensus.
>>>
>>>
>> You only need 3-days for lazy consensus.  Maybe if something was very
>> controversial you would make this longer.  Or if it is near a holiday where
>> many project members would be away.  But for routine things like mailing
>> list creation, 3-days is good.
>> 
>> 
>>> > Besides, I am surely happy to be one moderator and contribute my nearly
>>> 10
>>> > years QA experence in AOO.
>>> many thanks! So initial moderators are you and me.
>>>
>>>
>> I can help moderate as well.
>> 
>> -Rob
>> 
>> 
>>> thanks
>>>  Nakata Maho
>>>
>>> From: xia zhao 
>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:59:52 +0800
>>>
>>> > Nakata,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for creating QA list, this will help us to monitor and track QA
>>> > acitivties and status more efficiently.
>>> >
>>> > Besides, I am surely happy to be one moderator and contribute my nearly
>>> 10
>>> > years QA experence in AOO.
>>> >
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Lily
>>> >
>>> > 2012/3/23 Maho NAKATA 
>>> >
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> I would like to propose creation of ooo...@incubator.apache.org mailing
>>> >> list.
>>> >> QA interested people are defintely subscribing ooo-dev mailing list.
>>> >>
>>> >> Now we are approaching to release, therefore we need more QA relate
>>> work!
>>> >> Notable activity is that Lily summarizes qa weekly status
>>> >> including bugzilla activity as well.
>>> >> However currently, traffic of the ooo-dev mailing list is too high
>>> >> and many of them are not QA related subjects.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'd like to be a moderator. Of course, I'm very happy if Lily would
>>> become
>>> >> a moderator, too.
>>> >>
>>> >> My background for QA activity. I was the QA project lead (
>>> >> qa.openoffice.org) with Caio and Joost.
>>> >> I was a MacOSX PPC build provider, as well as FreeBSD porter. I'm also
>>> >> interested especially
>>> >> for automatic testing (so i had been provided VCLTesttool environment at
>>> >> good-day.net;
>>> >> unfortunately, good-day is gone...).
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >>  Nakata Maho
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi, All, Lily, Ram, and Rob,

Since no strong objections so I have just created a issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4625

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:26:37 -0400

> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Maho NAKATA  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Lily
>>
>> > Thanks for creating QA list, this will help us to monitor and track QA
>>
>> not yet. We should wait at least 2 weeks for lazy consensus.
>>
>>
> You only need 3-days for lazy consensus.  Maybe if something was very
> controversial you would make this longer.  Or if it is near a holiday where
> many project members would be away.  But for routine things like mailing
> list creation, 3-days is good.
> 
> 
>> > Besides, I am surely happy to be one moderator and contribute my nearly
>> 10
>> > years QA experence in AOO.
>> many thanks! So initial moderators are you and me.
>>
>>
> I can help moderate as well.
> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
>> thanks
>>  Nakata Maho
>>
>> From: xia zhao 
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list
>> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:59:52 +0800
>>
>> > Nakata,
>> >
>> > Thanks for creating QA list, this will help us to monitor and track QA
>> > acitivties and status more efficiently.
>> >
>> > Besides, I am surely happy to be one moderator and contribute my nearly
>> 10
>> > years QA experence in AOO.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> >
>> > Lily
>> >
>> > 2012/3/23 Maho NAKATA 
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to propose creation of ooo...@incubator.apache.org mailing
>> >> list.
>> >> QA interested people are defintely subscribing ooo-dev mailing list.
>> >>
>> >> Now we are approaching to release, therefore we need more QA relate
>> work!
>> >> Notable activity is that Lily summarizes qa weekly status
>> >> including bugzilla activity as well.
>> >> However currently, traffic of the ooo-dev mailing list is too high
>> >> and many of them are not QA related subjects.
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to be a moderator. Of course, I'm very happy if Lily would
>> become
>> >> a moderator, too.
>> >>
>> >> My background for QA activity. I was the QA project lead (
>> >> qa.openoffice.org) with Caio and Joost.
>> >> I was a MacOSX PPC build provider, as well as FreeBSD porter. I'm also
>> >> interested especially
>> >> for automatic testing (so i had been provided VCLTesttool environment at
>> >> good-day.net;
>> >> unfortunately, good-day is gone...).
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>  Nakata Maho
>> >>
>> >>
>>

Re: ImSoftwareSystems QA team

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Ram

Welcome Ram, Kishore, Neelima, Swamy, Kavita, and Janaki!
Best,
 Nakata Maho

From: 
Subject: ImSoftwareSystems QA team
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:47:31 +0530

> 
> 
> Hi All, 
> 
> From ImSoftwareSystems there are 4 people participating in the
> qa of AOO. Let me introduce myself. I am Ram babu Veeranki, I did my Master
> of Technology in Industrial Engineering. I have around 13 years of Software
> Development experience. I have worked for IBM for long time and resigned
> around 1 year back and started this company recently. 1.Kishore Vaka has
> around 7 years of QA experience.He worked for companies like Nokia,IBM. He
> did his Masters in computer applications. He leads the QA team. 2.Neelima T
> - She has Masters in Computer applications.She is a member of the QA
> team.
> 3.Swamy - He has bachelors degree in Engineering with specialisation
> in Electronics. He is a member of the QA team.
> 4.Kavita - She holds
> Bachelor's degree in Commerce. She involves in QA occasionally.
> 5.Janaki
> Devi - She holds Bachelor of Engineering in Computer science.She is a
> member if the QA team. Thanks & Regards, Im Software Systems

Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob

> You only need 3-days for lazy consensus.  Maybe if something was very
> controversial you would make this longer.  Or if it is near a holiday where

Ok I'll request on Thursday or Friday.

> I can help moderate as well.
Ok, please! 

Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:26:37 -0400

> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Maho NAKATA  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Lily
>>
>> > Thanks for creating QA list, this will help us to monitor and track QA
>>
>> not yet. We should wait at least 2 weeks for lazy consensus.
>>
>>
> You only need 3-days for lazy consensus.  Maybe if something was very
> controversial you would make this longer.  Or if it is near a holiday where
> many project members would be away.  But for routine things like mailing
> list creation, 3-days is good.
> 
> 
>> > Besides, I am surely happy to be one moderator and contribute my nearly
>> 10
>> > years QA experence in AOO.
>> many thanks! So initial moderators are you and me.
>>
>>
> I can help moderate as well.
> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
>> thanks
>>  Nakata Maho
>>
>> From: xia zhao 
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list
>> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:59:52 +0800
>>
>> > Nakata,
>> >
>> > Thanks for creating QA list, this will help us to monitor and track QA
>> > acitivties and status more efficiently.
>> >
>> > Besides, I am surely happy to be one moderator and contribute my nearly
>> 10
>> > years QA experence in AOO.
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> >
>> > Lily
>> >
>> > 2012/3/23 Maho NAKATA 
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to propose creation of ooo...@incubator.apache.org mailing
>> >> list.
>> >> QA interested people are defintely subscribing ooo-dev mailing list.
>> >>
>> >> Now we are approaching to release, therefore we need more QA relate
>> work!
>> >> Notable activity is that Lily summarizes qa weekly status
>> >> including bugzilla activity as well.
>> >> However currently, traffic of the ooo-dev mailing list is too high
>> >> and many of them are not QA related subjects.
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to be a moderator. Of course, I'm very happy if Lily would
>> become
>> >> a moderator, too.
>> >>
>> >> My background for QA activity. I was the QA project lead (
>> >> qa.openoffice.org) with Caio and Joost.
>> >> I was a MacOSX PPC build provider, as well as FreeBSD porter. I'm also
>> >> interested especially
>> >> for automatic testing (so i had been provided VCLTesttool environment at
>> >> good-day.net;
>> >> unfortunately, good-day is gone...).
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>  Nakata Maho
>> >>
>> >>
>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Lily

> Thanks for creating QA list, this will help us to monitor and track QA

not yet. We should wait at least 2 weeks for lazy consensus. 

> Besides, I am surely happy to be one moderator and contribute my nearly 10
> years QA experence in AOO.
many thanks! So initial moderators are you and me. 

thanks 
 Nakata Maho

From: xia zhao 
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:59:52 +0800

> Nakata,
> 
> Thanks for creating QA list, this will help us to monitor and track QA
> acitivties and status more efficiently.
> 
> Besides, I am surely happy to be one moderator and contribute my nearly 10
> years QA experence in AOO.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Lily
> 
> 2012/3/23 Maho NAKATA 
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to propose creation of ooo...@incubator.apache.org mailing
>> list.
>> QA interested people are defintely subscribing ooo-dev mailing list.
>>
>> Now we are approaching to release, therefore we need more QA relate work!
>> Notable activity is that Lily summarizes qa weekly status
>> including bugzilla activity as well.
>> However currently, traffic of the ooo-dev mailing list is too high
>> and many of them are not QA related subjects.
>>
>> I'd like to be a moderator. Of course, I'm very happy if Lily would become
>> a moderator, too.
>>
>> My background for QA activity. I was the QA project lead (
>> qa.openoffice.org) with Caio and Joost.
>> I was a MacOSX PPC build provider, as well as FreeBSD porter. I'm also
>> interested especially
>> for automatic testing (so i had been provided VCLTesttool environment at
>> good-day.net;
>> unfortunately, good-day is gone...).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>  Nakata Maho
>>
>>

Re: time to create ooo-qa mailing list? Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Lily,
ok I sent a proposal to ooo-dev.
Please wait for 2 weeks to 3 weeks. 
Please send an e-mail as a reply to my proposal with reasons why you think you 
need ooo-qa list.
Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: xia zhao 
Subject: Re: time to create ooo-qa mailing list? Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status 
Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:05:00 +0800

> Nakata,
> 
> Yes, I totally agree it's time to create QA mail list, who can help on it?
> It seems I haven't authority to create it. Do you can create? Or Rober, can
> you help?
> 
> Lily
> 
> 2012/3/21 Maho NAKATA 
> 
>> Hi Lily and all
>>
>> Now time to create a new ML, ooo-qa?
>> It's very hard to track such info, as you see, traffic of this mailing list
>> is very large amount.
>>
>> Thanks
>>  Nakata Maho
>>
>> From: xia zhao 
>> Subject: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 -
>> 2012.03.19)
>> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:38:53 +0800
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
>> > *Based on the test plan:
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan, I
>> can
>> > say that the planned work are 100% done.
>> > 100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the tests of areas
>> most
>> > impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
>> > 100% general testing have been done. These are general functional tests.
>> >
>> > *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/3/1 - 2012/3/12):
>> > *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev.
>> > r1299571<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eorw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe
>> >
>> > Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac Lionn, Ubuntu 10.04, Redhat 6.1,
>> > Windows 7 SP1
>> > Test Cases Executed:
>> > IP Clearance: libneon replacement issue tracking
>> > General testing:
>> > Math formula
>> > Some Base functions
>> > *Interoperability automaiton testing:*
>> > Tested total 1188 files with following file types:
>> >
>> (odt)|(ott)|(sxw)|(stw)|(doc)|(dot)|(ods)|(ots)|(sxc)|(stc)|(xls)|(xlt)|(odp)|(otp)|(sxi)|(sti)|(ppt)|(pot)
>> >
>> > The test scenarios cover:
>> >
>> >- Load
>> >- Save
>> >- Reopen
>> >
>> > Only one issue was found, it takes too long time (at least 4 minutes) to
>> > open one sample excel file and UI is blocked when loading. OpenOffice.org
>> > 3.3 has the same problem.  It's very quick using MS Office. Bug i119091
>> was
>> > raised for it. I checked the bugzilla, seems it is one known issue.
>> >
>> > *Defects Summary*:
>> > So far 360 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and 3.4m0. If we count
>> > the defects from 1th Aug. of last year, it means the about date we call
>> > "AOO 3.4", the total defects number is 271.
>> > Among the 360 defects, 51 critical defects raised and 17 ones remain
>> > opening now.
>> > One great news is currently we only have 3 reamining release blockers and
>> > two of them need be discussed:
>> >   D<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_id&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Sev▲<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_severity%20DESC%2Cpriority%2C&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Pri▲<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocke

[PROPOSAL] create ooo-qa mailing list

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi all,

I would like to propose creation of ooo...@incubator.apache.org mailing list.
QA interested people are defintely subscribing ooo-dev mailing list.

Now we are approaching to release, therefore we need more QA relate work!
Notable activity is that Lily summarizes qa weekly status
including bugzilla activity as well.
However currently, traffic of the ooo-dev mailing list is too high
and many of them are not QA related subjects. 

I'd like to be a moderator. Of course, I'm very happy if Lily would become
a moderator, too.

My background for QA activity. I was the QA project lead (qa.openoffice.org) 
with Caio and Joost.
I was a MacOSX PPC build provider, as well as FreeBSD porter. I'm also 
interested especially
for automatic testing (so i had been provided VCLTesttool environment at 
good-day.net;
unfortunately, good-day is gone...).

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

Re: time to create ooo-qa mailing list? Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)

[Maho NAKATA]

Hello Lily,

Khirano kindly inform me how to do it privately. I'll do it soon.

Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: xia zhao 
Subject: Re: time to create ooo-qa mailing list? Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status 
Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:05:00 +0800

> Nakata,
> 
> Yes, I totally agree it's time to create QA mail list, who can help on it?
> It seems I haven't authority to create it. Do you can create? Or Rober, can
> you help?
> 
> Lily
> 
> 2012/3/21 Maho NAKATA 
> 
>> Hi Lily and all
>>
>> Now time to create a new ML, ooo-qa?
>> It's very hard to track such info, as you see, traffic of this mailing list
>> is very large amount.
>>
>> Thanks
>>  Nakata Maho
>>
>> From: xia zhao 
>> Subject: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 -
>> 2012.03.19)
>> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:38:53 +0800
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
>> > *Based on the test plan:
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan, I
>> can
>> > say that the planned work are 100% done.
>> > 100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the tests of areas
>> most
>> > impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
>> > 100% general testing have been done. These are general functional tests.
>> >
>> > *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/3/1 - 2012/3/12):
>> > *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev.
>> > r1299571<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eorw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe
>> >
>> > Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac Lionn, Ubuntu 10.04, Redhat 6.1,
>> > Windows 7 SP1
>> > Test Cases Executed:
>> > IP Clearance: libneon replacement issue tracking
>> > General testing:
>> > Math formula
>> > Some Base functions
>> > *Interoperability automaiton testing:*
>> > Tested total 1188 files with following file types:
>> >
>> (odt)|(ott)|(sxw)|(stw)|(doc)|(dot)|(ods)|(ots)|(sxc)|(stc)|(xls)|(xlt)|(odp)|(otp)|(sxi)|(sti)|(ppt)|(pot)
>> >
>> > The test scenarios cover:
>> >
>> >- Load
>> >- Save
>> >- Reopen
>> >
>> > Only one issue was found, it takes too long time (at least 4 minutes) to
>> > open one sample excel file and UI is blocked when loading. OpenOffice.org
>> > 3.3 has the same problem.  It's very quick using MS Office. Bug i119091
>> was
>> > raised for it. I checked the bugzilla, seems it is one known issue.
>> >
>> > *Defects Summary*:
>> > So far 360 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and 3.4m0. If we count
>> > the defects from 1th Aug. of last year, it means the about date we call
>> > "AOO 3.4", the total defects number is 271.
>> > Among the 360 defects, 51 critical defects raised and 17 ones remain
>> > opening now.
>> > One great news is currently we only have 3 reamining release blockers and
>> > two of them need be discussed:
>> >   D<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_id&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Sev▲<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_severity%20DESC%2Cpriority%2C&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Pri▲<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=pri

Re: Apache list archive issues must be fixed soon

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob,

This issue is very important, as OpenOffice is an international
project. Still, we cannot write e-mails to exchange opinions..

Following are issues must be fixed soon.
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52195
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52182

Best,
 Nakata Maho

From: Kazunari Hirano 
Subject: Re: Apache list archive issues must be fixed soon
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:11:56 +0900

> Hi infrastructure team and all,
> 
> Thank you, Raphael Bircher, for updating Pootle.
> https://translate.apache.org/projects/OOo_34/
> 
> We would like to start with the translation.
> 
> To coordinate the translation work with Japanese users and Japanese
> contributors in Japanese language, the archive of our native language
> mailing list must be fixed.
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-general-ja/
> 
> We need your help soon.
> 
> Thanks,
> khirano
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Kazunari Hirano  wrote:
>> Hi Apache infrastructure team,
>>
>> Any news on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> khirano
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Kazunari Hirano  wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf  
>>> wrote:
 The upgrade was attempted, reverted due to causing
 silent breakage, and is on the queue for being re-attempted.
>>>
>>> This is a good news!  Thanks.
>>> khirano
>>> --
>>> khir...@apache.org
>>> Apache OpenOffice (incubating)
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/
> 

Re: [TRANSLATION] First part is now at pootle

[Maho NAKATA]

Hmmm

We need a description about "how to participate".
is it possible?
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Yue Helen 
Subject: Re: [TRANSLATION] First part is now at pootle
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:36:04 +0800

> I can also contribute...
> 
> The UI seems quite straightforward! while it's totally new to me, is there
> any guide for people like me?
> 
> Helen
> 
> 2012/3/21 Jing Bai 
> 
>> Same questions here. How could we register in the Apache Translate Pootle
>> service tool. Any way for us to register. We would like to contribute some
>> Chinese translation for the rest of the 1429 new/changed string in 3.4
>>
>> Best regards
>> Betsy
>>
>> 2012/3/21 Risto Jääskeläinen 
>>
>> > Raphael Bircher [r.birc...@gmx.ch] kirjoitti:
>> >
>> >> Hi at all
>> >>
>> >> You can find the languages wich have aktive support at the moment on
>> >> Pootle
>> >>
>> >> https://translate.apache.org/**projects/OOo_34/<
>> https://translate.apache.org/projects/OOo_34/>
>> >>
>> >> You can imediatly start with the rest of the translation.
>> >>
>> >> Greetings Raphael
>> >> --
>> >> My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Thank You very much!
>> >
>> > I find that
>> > 1) I am not registered in
>> > 2) There is no link for registration
>> > 3) I can make quite permanent translation by Lähetä (Send?) button
>> > 4) If I use Ehdota (Suggest?) button it is made by "nobody".
>> >
>> > Number 3 is quite insecure I think?
>> > I like to register myself in Pootle system.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Risto
>> >
>> >
>>

time to create ooo-qa mailing list? Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Lily and all

Now time to create a new ML, ooo-qa?
It's very hard to track such info, as you see, traffic of this mailing list
is very large amount.

Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: xia zhao 
Subject: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 
2012.03.19)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:38:53 +0800

> Hi all,
> 
> *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
> *Based on the test plan:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan, I can
> say that the planned work are 100% done.
> 100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the tests of areas most
> impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
> 100% general testing have been done. These are general functional tests.
> 
> *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/3/1 - 2012/3/12):
> *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev.
> r1299571
> Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac Lionn, Ubuntu 10.04, Redhat 6.1,
> Windows 7 SP1
> Test Cases Executed:
> IP Clearance: libneon replacement issue tracking
> General testing:
> Math formula
> Some Base functions
> *Interoperability automaiton testing:*
> Tested total 1188 files with following file types:
> (odt)|(ott)|(sxw)|(stw)|(doc)|(dot)|(ods)|(ots)|(sxc)|(stc)|(xls)|(xlt)|(odp)|(otp)|(sxi)|(sti)|(ppt)|(pot)
> 
> The test scenarios cover:
> 
>- Load
>- Save
>- Reopen
> 
> Only one issue was found, it takes too long time (at least 4 minutes) to
> open one sample excel file and UI is blocked when loading. OpenOffice.org
> 3.3 has the same problem.  It's very quick using MS Office. Bug i119091 was
> raised for it. I checked the bugzilla, seems it is one known issue.
> 
> *Defects Summary*:
> So far 360 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and 3.4m0. If we count
> the defects from 1th Aug. of last year, it means the about date we call
> "AOO 3.4", the total defects number is 271.
> Among the 360 defects, 51 critical defects raised and 17 ones remain
> opening now.
> One great news is currently we only have 3 reamining release blockers and
> two of them need be discussed:
>   
> D
> Sev▲
> Pri▲
> OS
> Assignee
> Status
> Resolution

Re: AOO Logo for FreeBSD

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro,

Looks good, However,

> that's a little tough at this time. I also kept the small BSD
> daemon separated on purpose so that there is no

for the BSD daemon picture, we need explict permission from Kirk McKusick.
http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html

> BSD Daemon Copyright 1988 by Marshall Kirk McKusick. All Rights Reserved.
> 
> Permission to use the daemon may be obtained from:
> 
> Marshall Kirk McKusick
> 1614 Oxford St
> Berkeley, CA 94709-1608
> USA
> 
> or via email at mckus...@mckusick.com.

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: AOO Logo for FreeBSD
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:01:36 -0500

> I am giving a thought on a new logo for use with FreeBSD's
> port. Here is a WIP:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~pfg/images/ApacheOO-BSD.png
> 
> The idea is to use a modern logo and give a little more strength
> to the fact that we are using the new license. It would also be
> good to use the concept of a feather like the classic pen but
> that's a little tough at this time. I also kept the small BSD
> daemon separated on purpose so that there is no
> confusion.
> 
> All the fonts used are under AL2 (droid), no daemons or any
> form of dead or undead creatures were harmed during the
> making of this logo.
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Pedro.
> 

Re: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob

Is it also possible to paste it to the blog?
just paste ... nothing more effort than rewriting, or is it a marketing matter?
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:18:21 -0500

> As we approach the first Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice 3.4,
> it would be wonderful if we could have some more volunteers testing
> the latest dev snapshots builds. Following is some information on what
> this requires, and how you can help.
> 
> First, if you have never tested a pre-release product before, know
> that bugs are expected. That is the purpose of testing, to find bugs
> so they can be fixed. Bugs could range from UI glitches, to incorrect
> formatting to crashes or even data corruption.  So you probably don't
> want to use a test build for mission-critical tasks. Of course, I
> assume you have already backed up your important documents.  You do
> have backups, right?  Ideally you can do your testing on a separate
> machine from your main work machine, so if something goes wrong you
> will not interfere with your other work.
> 
> The above are all sensible precautions when testing any pre-release
> software product.
> 
> If you are ready to test, you can download the latest developer
> snapshot build from this page:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
> 
> We could use help verifying the install in all real-world scenarios,
> on clean OS installs, as upgrades to previous versions of OOo and as
> installs on machines where LibreOffice or Symphony are already
> installed.
> 
> Once you have installed, launch OpenOffice and look at the Help/About
> box.  If the revision shown there matches the build you installed
> (e..g, "r1293550") then the install was a success. Please send a short
> note to the ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org telling us what platform and
> scenario you installed (fresh install, upgrade, install next to
> LibreOffice, etc.).  This will help us understand what scenarios have
> already been attempted and which have not.
> 
> After you have installed, there are three approaches to testing, of
> increasing degrees of formality:
> 
> 1) Just use the dev snapshot for your ordinary work, doing your
> ordinary tasks.  When you observe a bug, submit a report on this to
> Bugzilla.
> 
> 2) Self-directed testing.  Pick an area of the product that you
> understand well, like printing or text formatting, or slide show
> transitions.  Spend an hour or two trying to exercise that feature in
> all its variations.  If there is a dialog box, try manipulating all of
> its values.  If it is a formatting option, create a document that uses
> all variations.   Try to break it.  Try to think like a bug.
> 
> A special area that could use attention is version compatibility.
> Take all of your OpenOffice.org 3.3 documents and open them up on AOO
> 3.4.  Any errors?  Formatting issues?  Crashes? Missing data?   Ditto
> for opening Microsoft Office documents.  Are there any regressions,
> e.g., things that worked in 3.3 but now break in 3.4?  Try it in the
> other direction as well.  If you create a document in AOO 3.4, can it
> be read correctly in OOo 3.3?  Did we do anything that breaks
> backwards compatibility?
> 
> Another special area is to verify the translations.  Install a
> multi-language install or a language pack and check the translation
> for completeness and accuracy.  If it looks good, please send a note
> to the list, so we know it has already been verified. If there are
> bugs, please enter into Bugzilla.
> 
> 3) Cover test cases from the test plan
> 
> A 3.4 test plan is on the wiki here:
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/
> 
> Results are here:  http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestResults
> 
> Look for an area that has not been tested, test it, and upload your results.
> 
> In all cases, if you find bugs, report them in Bugzilla:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
> 
> We can also use help re-testing bugs that have been marked as fixed,
> and confirming/reproducing newly reported bugs.  If you want to help
> in Bugzilla, sign up for an account and respond to this note and ask
> for your ID to be put in the  "qa-team" group, so you will have
> expanded permissions to edit issues.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Rob
> 

Re: Draft blog post on FreeBSD port of AOO

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob,

thank you very much!

Best
 Nakata Maho

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Re: Draft blog post on FreeBSD port of AOO
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:56:42 -0500

> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Maho NAKATA  wrote:
>> Hello Rob and Pedro,
>>
>> Looks good to me. Thank you very much for polishing!
>> So please go ahead.
> 
> 
> OK.  The blog post is now published:
> 
> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/apache_openoffice_has_been_ported
> 
> Let's share via social networks, blogs, etc.
> 
> I've shared on Twitter and Google+ if anyone wants to RT or Share these posts:
> 
> http://twitter.com/rcweir/statuses/174870013738614784
> 
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/110021943609888508798/posts/NiZKSUQZopB
> 
> -Rob
> 
>> Anyway, here are my photos:
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/200811152043001.jpg
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/IMG_1067.jpg
>>
>> Thanks,
>>  Nakata Maho
>>
>> From: Rob Weir 
>> Subject: Re: Draft blog post on FreeBSD port of AOO
>> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:15:59 -0500
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Pedro Giffuni  wrote:
>>>> On 02/27/12 13:30, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is based on a draft from Maho, with some additional edits from
>>>>> me.  Please take a look and suggest improvements:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_openoffice_has_been_ported
>>>>
>>>> If Maho approves, I have some suggestions:
>>>>
>>>> To the end of the first paragraph add " Maintaining this new port
>>>> in Apache source tree helps improve the overall portability of
>>>> the system and provides another valuable testing environment."
>>>>
>>>> The second paragraph, may sound better "FreeBSD is a free operating system
>>>> based on Berkeley's 4.4 BSD source release." Add a last sentence in that
>>>> paragraph: "Since the origins of the Internet it has been known to break 
>>>> ftp
>>>> performance records and power important sites like Yahoo, Hotmail and the
>>>> ASF infrastructure."
>>>>
>>>> change (old) OpenOffice.org --> legacy OpenOffice.org
>>>>
>>>> Instead of MN and PG --> maho@ and pfg@
>>>>
>>>> The FreeBSD team did not create fork. --> The FreeBSD team did not fork.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps add "In FreeBSD, OpenOffice and LibreOffice porters share their
>>>> efforts
>>>> in a common mailing list: off...@freebsd.org.
>>>>
>>>> The "Notably, Jung-uk Kim ..." line should be moved to the end of the
>>>> "Historically," paragraph.
>>>>
>>>> "Technically, porting is not difficult."  --> "Technically, porting has not
>>>> been very difficult.".
>>>> After " ... linux and FreeBSD are very similar", I would add "MacOSX and
>>>> FreeBSD also
>>>> share many similarities which have helped improve both ports."
>>>>
>>>> I would put that paragraph before the "Since the OpenOffice project
>>>> migrated".
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK.  I made those changes on the draft.
>>>
>>> One thing that is not clear to me is the reference to the "dynamic
>>> liner issue".  Would it be worth linking to a bug report or something
>>> to explain what this was?
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we could get photographs of Maho and Pedro as well?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe just Maho's since he is the one signing ;).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Pedro.
>>>
> 

Re: Draft blog post on FreeBSD port of AOO

[Maho NAKATA]

Hello Rob and Pedro,

Looks good to me. Thank you very much for polishing!
So please go ahead.
Anyway, here are my photos:
http://accc.riken.jp/maho/200811152043001.jpg
http://accc.riken.jp/maho/IMG_1067.jpg

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Re: Draft blog post on FreeBSD port of AOO
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:15:59 -0500

> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Pedro Giffuni  wrote:
>> On 02/27/12 13:30, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> This is based on a draft from Maho, with some additional edits from
>>> me.  Please take a look and suggest improvements:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_openoffice_has_been_ported
>>
>> If Maho approves, I have some suggestions:
>>
>> To the end of the first paragraph add " Maintaining this new port
>> in Apache source tree helps improve the overall portability of
>> the system and provides another valuable testing environment."
>>
>> The second paragraph, may sound better "FreeBSD is a free operating system
>> based on Berkeley's 4.4 BSD source release." Add a last sentence in that
>> paragraph: "Since the origins of the Internet it has been known to break ftp
>> performance records and power important sites like Yahoo, Hotmail and the
>> ASF infrastructure."
>>
>> change (old) OpenOffice.org --> legacy OpenOffice.org
>>
>> Instead of MN and PG --> maho@ and pfg@
>>
>> The FreeBSD team did not create fork. --> The FreeBSD team did not fork.
>>
>> Perhaps add "In FreeBSD, OpenOffice and LibreOffice porters share their
>> efforts
>> in a common mailing list: off...@freebsd.org.
>>
>> The "Notably, Jung-uk Kim ..." line should be moved to the end of the
>> "Historically," paragraph.
>>
>> "Technically, porting is not difficult."  --> "Technically, porting has not
>> been very difficult.".
>> After " ... linux and FreeBSD are very similar", I would add "MacOSX and
>> FreeBSD also
>> share many similarities which have helped improve both ports."
>>
>> I would put that paragraph before the "Since the OpenOffice project
>> migrated".
>>
> 
> OK.  I made those changes on the draft.
> 
> One thing that is not clear to me is the reference to the "dynamic
> liner issue".  Would it be worth linking to a bug report or something
> to explain what this was?
> 
> -Rob
> 
> 
>>
>>> Maybe we could get photographs of Maho and Pedro as well?
>>
>>
>> Maybe just Maho's since he is the one signing ;).
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Pedro.
> 

Re: Draft blog post on FreeBSD port of AOO

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob,

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Re: Draft blog post on FreeBSD port of AOO
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:22:03 -0500

> One thing I was uncertain of. Do you really want users to report bugs
> directly to you and Maho?  Wouldn't it make more sense to send them to
> BZ or to a mailing list? From a community development perspective?

This statement is just stress on who are the maintainers, and if I recieve
e-mails, I'll ask submitters to submit to bugzilla or mailing list.

In my experience, reports are build breakages, which are not
essential. They usually e-mail me directly or off...@freebsd.org. 

Anyway, off...@freebsd.org is not so active :-(

Thanks
 Nakata Maho

Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro,

I have just committed a fix.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-apr
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-aprutil
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-scp2
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-serf

In your case, somehow your build system picked up system apr aprutil and serf,
then build proceeded, finally build was broken.

* to deliver to solver correctly we must modify prj/d.lst in apr, aprutil and 
serf.
* to make installation set, we must add in scp2.

thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:16:41 -0500

> Hello Maho;
> 
> 
> On 02/26/12 20:24, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hi Pedro,
>>
>> From: Pedro Giffuni
>> Subject: Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.
>> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:37:49 -0500
>>
>>> Hi Maho;
>>>
>>> On 02/25/12 16:35, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>>>> Hi Pedro
>>>>
>>>>> The naming scheme is completely inappropriate for FreeBSD:
>>>> I think this is right, but again, this is libtool (version numbering
>>>> scheme difference between Linux and FreeBSD). Patching agianist
>>>> ltmain.sh would solve that type of problem.
>>> I haven't had time to investigate it but I think the problem lies in
>>> those version.mk files. OpenOffice simply imposes ignores libedit
>>> and the native build system and tries to impose the linux
>>> numbering everywhere.
>> yes. in scp2 project we speficy the version number for shared lib.
>>
>> quoting from scp2/source/ooo/file_library_ooo.scp for example as
>> follows:
>>
>> File gid_File_Lib_Serf
>>  #ifdef WNT
>>  Name = SPECIAL_NAME(serf);
>>  #else
>>  // Looks like the major version number is part of the name, not
>>  // part of the suffix.  An error?
>>  #ifdef MACOSX
>>  Name =
>>  
>> STRING(CONCAT6(libserf-1,.0.,SERF_MINOR,.,SERF_MICRO,UNXSUFFIX));
>>  #else
>>  Name =
>>  
>> STRING(CONCAT6(libserf-1,UNXSUFFIX,.0.,SERF_MINOR,.,SERF_MICRO));
>>  #endif
>>  #endif
>>  PACKED_LIB_FILE_BODY;
>> End
>> . There are a lot of such kind of things. So we must compromise.
>> if we change version number in scp2, we have to take care of all
>> stuffs.
>> if we change version number in each internal library, we usually have
>> to
>> patch ltmail.sh
> Nice find, thank you.
> 
> I think I prefer the first option: the sysv/linux versioning doesn't
> really fit for FreeBSD and I expect we will be using the
> prepackaged version of apr and serf as soon as that option is
> available.
> 
> Patching ltmain.sh is something we can probably manage for
> coinmp but if we have to do the same for apr, serf, and whatever
> new library IBM or someone else brings in the future I don't think
> that will scale well.
> 
> Pedro.
> 
>>>> Could you please tell me which svn revision and configure line...
>>> I am using your port but with Revision 1293349, but any post-neon
>>> replacement should exhibit the same error.
>>>
>>> Pedro.
>>>
>>>> From: Pedro Giffuni
>>>> Subject: Build broken on FreeBSD.
>>>> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:53:16 -0500
>>>>
>>>>> Hi;
>>>>>
>>>>> Just FYI
>>>>> __
>>>>> ...
>>>>> ... analyzing files ...
>>>>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.so.0.4.5
>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.so.0.4.1
>>>>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.so.0.0.0
>>>>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>>>>> ... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_713701330104152 ...
>>>>> ...
>>>>> ___
>>>>>
>>>>> The naming scheme is completely inappropriate for FreeBSD:
>>>>>
>>>>> ls /usr/local/lib/libapr*
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.a/usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.a
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.la   /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.la
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so   /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so.4 /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so.3
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Pedro.
>>>>>
> 

Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Andre and Pedro

> Yes, and it does not work so well on Mac either.  It does not even
> follow the Linux naming scheme (see the 0 in libapr-1.so.0.4.5? I do
> not know where that does come from.)
It came from "libtool".
Usually it is included in the tar ball, but it pick up from system's libtool
(e.g. /usr/bin/libtoo, /usr/local/bin/libtool, /sw/bin/libtool or 
/opt/local/bin/libtool...)
Therefore, we cannot change the version number easily.

Pedro:
In this case, we should use FreeBSD style naming for shared libs. Therefore
patching scp2 is easier and better solution...

Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Andre Fischer 
Subject: Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:42:53 +0100

> On 24.02.2012 18:53, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>> Hi;
>>
>> Just FYI
>> __
>> ...
>> ... analyzing files ...
>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.so.0.4.5
>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.so.0.4.1
>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.so.0.0.0
>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>> ... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_713701330104152 ...
>> ...
>> ___
>>
>> The naming scheme is completely inappropriate for FreeBSD:
> 
> Yes, and it does not work so well on Mac either.  It does not even
> follow the Linux naming scheme (see the 0 in libapr-1.so.0.4.5? I do
> not know where that does come from.)  And on Windows we have a special
> makefile which uses yet another naming scheme.
> 
> Welcome in multi-platform-world.
> 
> Apr (and apr-util and serf) are external libraries.  Our means to
> control the names of the libraries are limited.  If anyone knows how
> to change that, please let me know.
> 
> If that leads to problems with pre-installed libs on any platform then
> we should look for a solution that works on all platforms.  The
> problem, as I understand it, is this:
> 
> A - The modules apr, apr-util, and serf (and possibly coinmp) use
> their original (mostly) configure scripts to generate the library
> name.
> 
> B - This name is used in scp2/ to a) include the actual library into
> the pack set and b) create some symbolic links that strip away the
> micro and minor version numbers.
> 
> C - This name is not the same as the one of libraries that are already
> installed on the system.  The system libraries are therefore not found
> at run-time.
> 
> 
> I would attempt a solution somewhere between A and B.  We already have
> {library}_version.mk files in apr,apr-util, and serf that communicate
> the major, minor, and micro version numbers to scp2.  Maybe we can
> rename the libraries to whatever name is appropriate on a platform at
> the time when the libraries are delivered into solver/ and then use
> the {library}_version.mk file to get the new name into scp2?  For this
> we have to append the new name to the makefile before it is also
> delivered.
> 
> This should be relatively simple and would require platform specific
> knowledge only in apr, apr-util, and serf.
> 
> -Andre
> 
> 
>>
>> ls /usr/local/lib/libapr*
>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.a /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.a
>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.la /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.la
>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so
>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so.4 /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so.3
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Pedro.
> 

Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:16:41 -0500

> I think I prefer the first option: the sysv/linux versioning doesn't
> really fit for FreeBSD and I expect we will be using the
> prepackaged version of apr and serf as soon as that option is
> available.
> 
> Patching ltmain.sh is something we can probably manage for
> coinmp but if we have to do the same for apr, serf, and whatever
> new library IBM or someone else brings in the future I don't think
> that will scale well.

No, both doesn't scale, and I prefer patching ltmain.sh.
In the former solution, we have to patch files in scp2
almost everywhere and introduce additioan IF DEF for each shared lib.
We also patch prj/d.lst as well. This is much more tedious than expected.

I understand Linux style versioning won't fit for FreeBSD,
but if you don't like it, just use external libs.

Thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro,

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:37:49 -0500

> Hi Maho;
> 
> On 02/25/12 16:35, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hi Pedro
>>
>>> The naming scheme is completely inappropriate for FreeBSD:
>> I think this is right, but again, this is libtool (version numbering
>> scheme difference between Linux and FreeBSD). Patching agianist
>> ltmain.sh would solve that type of problem.
> 
> I haven't had time to investigate it but I think the problem lies in
> those version.mk files. OpenOffice simply imposes ignores libedit
> and the native build system and tries to impose the linux
> numbering everywhere.

yes. in scp2 project we speficy the version number for shared lib.

quoting from scp2/source/ooo/file_library_ooo.scp for example as follows:

File gid_File_Lib_Serf
#ifdef WNT
Name = SPECIAL_NAME(serf);
#else
// Looks like the major version number is part of the name, not
// part of the suffix.  An error?
#ifdef MACOSX
Name = 
STRING(CONCAT6(libserf-1,.0.,SERF_MINOR,.,SERF_MICRO,UNXSUFFIX));
#else
Name = 
STRING(CONCAT6(libserf-1,UNXSUFFIX,.0.,SERF_MINOR,.,SERF_MICRO));
#endif
#endif
PACKED_LIB_FILE_BODY;
End
. There are a lot of such kind of things. So we must compromise.
if we change version number in scp2, we have to take care of all stuffs.
if we change version number in each internal library, we usually have to
patch ltmail.sh

>> Could you please tell me which svn revision and configure line...
> 
> I am using your port but with Revision 1293349, but any post-neon
> replacement should exhibit the same error.
> 
> Pedro.
> 
>>
>> From: Pedro Giffuni
>> Subject: Build broken on FreeBSD.
>> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:53:16 -0500
>>
>>> Hi;
>>>
>>> Just FYI
>>> __
>>> ...
>>> ... analyzing files ...
>>> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
>>> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.so.0.4.5
>>> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.so.0.4.1
>>> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.so.0.0.0
>>> ... cleaning the output tree ...
>>> ... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_713701330104152 ...
>>> ...
>>> ___
>>>
>>> The naming scheme is completely inappropriate for FreeBSD:
>>>
>>> ls /usr/local/lib/libapr*
>>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.a/usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.a
>>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.la   /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.la
>>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so   /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so
>>> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so.4 /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so.3
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Pedro.
>>>
> 

Re: Build broken on FreeBSD.

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro

> The naming scheme is completely inappropriate for FreeBSD:

I think this is right, but again, this is libtool (version numbering
scheme difference between Linux and FreeBSD). Patching agianist
ltmain.sh would solve that type of problem.

Could you please tell me which svn revision and configure line...

thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: Build broken on FreeBSD.
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:53:16 -0500

> Hi;
> 
> Just FYI
> __
> ...
> ... analyzing files ...
> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.so.0.4.5
> ERROR: File not found: libaprutil-1.so.0.4.1
> ERROR: File not found: libserf-1.so.0.0.0
> ... cleaning the output tree ...
> ... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_713701330104152 ...
> ...
> ___
> 
> The naming scheme is completely inappropriate for FreeBSD:
> 
> ls /usr/local/lib/libapr*
> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.a/usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.a
> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.la   /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.la
> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so   /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so
> /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so.4 /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so.3
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Pedro.
> 

ENABLE_PRESENTER_EXTRA_UI is no more used?

[Maho NAKATA]

quoting from slideshow/source/engine/makefile.mk

> .IF "$(ENABLE_PRESENTER_EXTRA_UI)"=="YES"
> ENABLE_PRESENTER_EXTRA_UI is not used anymore
> .ENDIF

quoting from configure.in
> AC_ARG_ENABLE(presenter-extra-ui,
> [  --enable-presenter-extra-ui   enables extra functionality during slideshow,
>  e.g. selecting pen color, erasing drawings 
> etc.
> ],,enable_presenter_extra_ui=no)

Which can be used? I don't know.
Anyway cleanup is needed.

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

Re: swext contains LGPL code

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

thanks for your comment.

> Is it possible that you are looking at an older revision?  I can not
> find the swext/source directory anymore.

Yes, it has been removed at least svn revision 1291759
and exists in svn revision 1290975.

thanks,
 Nakata Maho


From: Andre Fischer 
Subject: Re: swext contains LGPL code
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:59:19 +0100

> On 21.02.2012 13:57, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> swext/source/pdfimport/xpdfwrapper/wrapper_gpl.hxx
>> swext/source/pdfimport/xpdfwrapper/wrapper_gpl.cxx
> 
> Is it possible that you are looking at an older revision?  I can not
> find the swext/source directory anymore.
> 
> -Andre
> 
>>
>> copyright headers show that they are LGPL'ed code.
>>
>> Is it okay? Just I'm not sure...
>>
>> thanks
>> -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO
>> -- http://ja.openoffice.org/
>> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG:
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
>>
> 

Re: Proposal for AOO test tool

[Maho NAKATA]

From: xia zhao 
Subject: Re: Proposal for AOO test tool
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:32:15 +0800

> I give 1+ for test tools usage for AOO 4.0 based on below points:

+1.

> 1. For community product, we don't know if same resoruce will be there for
> next release.

right.

> 2. We sould follow the strategy that automtic more and more test cases, but
> for these automated test cases, as one experienced QA who have worked
> on this area for nearly 10 years, many automatic test cases comes from
> manual test cases, that is, bettter structuring the cases first and
> selecting some to automatic, considering that not all of cases can be
> automaticed.

YES.

> 3. Form quality view, it's better have one tool to track QA effort.
> 
> But one easy and simple to maintance testing tool should be proposed.
> 
> Besides, Rob's transfering bugzilla issues to test cases is one good idea.
> 
> 2012/2/14 Rob Weir 
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ji Yan  wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> >  Recently, I'm thinking about how testing work should be done and what
>> the
>> > procedure should followed under Apache OO structure. Before OO goes into
>> > ASF, testing work was controlled by QUASTe and manual test cases stored
>> in
>> > TCM but both tools were disconnected once Oracle donated OO to Apache.
>> Now,
>> > it's time for us to think about how can we move on for testing.
>> >  While within AOO 3.4, we store the manual scripts in wiki page, it's
>> good
>> > place at this time, but should not be permanent. As it's hard to tell
>> test
>> > status and collect testing data, also it has no connection with
>> automation
>> > test tool.
>>
>> I wonder if Bugzilla would be better than the wiki?
>>
>> We could create a "product" in BZ for all test cases, with
>> "components" under that for different test areas, like "performance
>> test", "smoke test", "detailed test", etc.
>>
>> One BZ issue per test case.
>>
>> For each test pass, we simply reset each test case/issue back to "New
>> state".  We then test each issue.  If the test case passes, then we
>> mark the BZ issue as closed.  If the test case fails, then we already
>> have a BZ issue for the developers.
>>
>> Pro: Makes it very easy to make new test cases from existing BZ
>> issues, or to make BZ issues from testcases.
>>
>> Con: Reporting not so good.   Does not handle doing multiple test
>> passes in parallel.  For example, if we wanted to test AOO 4.0 in
>> parallel with a maintenance AOO 3.4.1 release.
>>
>>
>> >  After review some tools, I find the "Test Link"[1], maybe the proper
>> tool
>> > for us to manage testing work. If anyone has any suggestion on other
>> tools,
>> > please let me know. The target is to customize and deploy it to OO
>> > website. I'll move forward with this tool with no objection
>> >
>> > [1] http://testlink.sourceforge.net/docs/testLink.php
>> > --
>>
>> I tried their demo site.  It was very slow.  Does anyone have
>> experience with Test Link?
>>
>> The above link should be only one sample. The performance depends on the
> where to host it and the network speed. I care more about even TestLink is
> one good tool to community to use, is it possible ASF host it?
> 
>> -Rob
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks & Best Regards, Yan Ji
>>

Re: BSDCan

[Maho NAKATA]

>>> I proposed a talk about AOO for the next BSDCan:
>>>
>>> http://www.bsdcan.org/2012/

+1
as a FreeBSD ports committer.
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Louis Suárez-Potts 
Subject: Re: BSDCan (was Re: OpenOffice.org meetup in Holland)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:27 -0500

> Juergen, would you accept constructive critique? Given that your
> presentation effectively would be representing the work being done and
> to be done, it would be good to have clear, forceful language….  and
> last I heard, English as she is spoke is me native tongue. ;-)
> 
> Ciao
> Louis
> 
> 
> 
> On 13 February 2012 04:01, Jürgen Schmidt  wrote:
>> On 2/11/12 6:34 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I proposed a talk about AOO for the next BSDCan:
>>>
>>> http://www.bsdcan.org/2012/
>>>
>> I have proposed a paper for the LinuxTag in Berlin in May. It's under review
>> and not yet accepted.
>>
>> Short abstract
>> "OpenOffice is the leading open source office productivity suite and 2011
>> was a challenging year for the OpenOffice project. The main sponsor Oracle
>> announced to stop their investment in the project and they granted the
>> source code and the trademarks to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). The
>> presentation is intended to inform about the current status, the future and
>> to clarify many wrong and misleading communication around the project."
>>
>> Future plans will be based on discussions here on the list and the proposed
>> 4.0 features etc.
>>
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I actually have to prepare another, more technical, talk
>>> for the same event so having a standard presentation
>>> template to start with would be good.
>>>
>>> Pedro.
>>>
>>>
>>> --- Sab 11/2/12, Rob Weir  ha scritto:
>>>
>>>

 I'm not sure it would help in this particular case, but we
 should probably develop a standard project overview
 presentation that we can keep up-to-date and translate.
  Cover the basics of what AOO is as a product, platforms,
 languages, functionality, standards supported,
 etc., then discuss Apache and AOO as a project, and then end
 with future plans and an invitation to get involved.  If we
 had such a 20 slide presentation, it would make it easier
 for project members, and other interested parties, to help
 spread the word at smaller events.

 Is there a standard Apache presentation template?

>>>
>>>
 -Rob

> //drew
>
>
>
>
 -
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

>>
> 

FreeBSD Coin patch

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro,
Could you please investigate this?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-coinmp

-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: Top AOO 3.4 Features?

[Maho NAKATA]

hi

> The correction of the Asian word count?  It is the base of payment
> of business office application, for publishers, translation agencies,
> even school homework.

oh that's great!

From: imacat 
Subject: Re: Top AOO 3.4 Features?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:47:01 +0800

> On 2012/02/14 03:17, Rob Weir said:
>> I'd like to write a blog post on the top new things in AOO 3.4, from
>> the user perspective, compared to OOo 3.3.
>> What would you put on that list?  What are the benefits of upgrading?
> 
> The correction of the Asian word count?  It is the base of payment
> of business office application, for publishers, translation agencies,
> even school homework.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> imacat ^_*' 
> PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
> 
> <> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/
> Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/
> Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/
> Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/
> EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/
> 

Re: build brekage at apache-commons on FreeBSD

[Maho NAKATA]

thanks!
I updated the tree and now it's fine!

From: "L'oiseau de mer" 
Subject: Re: build brekage at apache-commons on FreeBSD
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:54:24 +0800

> yesterday i also meet this error on Solaris.
> But maybe today has been modified.
> I has build success in Rev 1243337 today.
> 
> 2012/2/13 Maho NAKATA :
>> Hi
>>
>> svn revision 1243198 on FreeBSD is broken at apache-commns like
>> following...
>>
>> fice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/apache-commons/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/commons-logging-1.1.1-src/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/ServletContextCleaner.java:135:
>>  cannot find symbol
>>    [javac] symbol  : class ServletContextEvent
>>    [javac] location: class 
>> org.apache.commons.logging.impl.ServletContextCleaner
>>    [javac]     public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent sce) {
>>    [javac]                                    ^
>>    [javac] 5 errors
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> /work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/apache-commons/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/commons-logging-1.1.1-src/build.xml:359:
>>  Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
>>
>> Any help?
>> -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
>> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: 
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
> 

Re: STLport or not?

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

adding --without-stlport configure flag 
(I might be wrong...)
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: "Yuri Dario" 
Subject: Re: STLport or not?
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:49:20 + (UTC)

> Hi
> 
>> To me (FreeBSD porter)
>> I build without STLport (to prevent build error) for
>> next svn revision
> 
> let me know how it works without stlport.
> 
> thanks
> 
> -- 
> Bye,
> 
>   Yuri Dario
> 
> /*
>  * OS/2 open source software
>  * http://web.os2power.com/yuri
>  * http://www.netlabs.org
> */
> 
> 

build brekage at apache-commons on FreeBSD

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

svn revision 1243198 on FreeBSD is broken at apache-commns like
following...

fice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/apache-commons/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/commons-logging-1.1.1-src/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/ServletContextCleaner.java:135:
 cannot find symbol
[javac] symbol  : class ServletContextEvent
[javac] location: class 
org.apache.commons.logging.impl.ServletContextCleaner
[javac] public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent sce) {
[javac]^
[javac] 5 errors

BUILD FAILED
/work/tinderbox-ligeti8amd64/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/apache-commons/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/commons-logging-1.1.1-src/build.xml:359:
 Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.

Any help?
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: STLport or not?

[Maho NAKATA]

To me (FreeBSD porter)
I build without STLport (to prevent build error) for
next svn revision.
thanks
 Nakata Maho
From: "Yuri Dario" 
Subject: STLport or not?
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:11:42 + (UTC)

> Hi all,
> 
> 
> what do you think about building OOo  with or without STLport?
> 
> In my case, OS/2 port, I don't care about loosing ABI compatibility 
> with older builds.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Bye,
> 
>   Yuri Dario
> 
> /*
>  * OS/2 open source software
>  * http://web.os2power.com/yuri
>  * http://www.netlabs.org
> */
> 
> 

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on aoo-win7

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi, Pedro

I have just removed -ldl, and it should build fine.
You may want to polish up and commit it ;-)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/patch-serf

thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on aoo-win7
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:16:33 -0800 (PST)

> 
> 
> --- Gio 9/2/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile  ha scritto:
> 
>> Da: Ariel Constenla-Haile 
>> Oggetto: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on aoo-win7
>> A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Data: Giovedì 9 febbraio 2012, 00:55
>> Hi Pedro,
>> 
>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:12:23PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni
>> wrote:
>> > FWIW;
>> > 
>> > --- Mer 8/2/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile 
>> ha scritto:
>> > ...
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > So it seems $(OUTPUT) should be replaced by
>> $(INPATH).
>> > > Committed as Revision 1242210
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > The build appears broken here, I updated to the latest
>> > SVN but still not joy:
>> > 
>> > http://people.apache.org/~pfg/logs/build-serf.log
>> > 
>> > Entering
>> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/sal/rtl/source
>> > 
>> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldl
>> > gmake: *** [libserf-1.la] Error 1
>> > dmake:  Error code 2, while making
>> './unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_serf'
>> > 
>> > Pedro.
>> 
>> This error is unrelated.
>> 
>> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/lib/apr/libtool
>> 
>> --silent 
>> --tag=CC 
>> --mode=link 
>> cc 
>> -L/usr/local/lib  
>> -rpath /usr/local/serf/lib 
>> -o libserf-1.la 
>> buckets/aggregate_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/request_buckets.lo 
>> context.lo buckets/buckets.lo 
>> buckets/simple_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/file_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/mmap_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/socket_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/response_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/headers_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/allocator.lo 
>> buckets/dechunk_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/deflate_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/limit_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/ssl_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/barrier_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/chunk_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/bwtp_buckets.lo 
>> buckets/iovec_buckets.lo 
>> incoming.lo 
>> outgoing.lo 
>> ssltunnel.lo 
>> auth/auth.lo 
>> auth/auth_basic.lo 
>> auth/auth_digest.lo 
>> auth/auth_kerb.lo 
>> auth/auth_kerb_gss.lo 
>> -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/lib
>> 
>> -R/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/lib
>> 
>> -laprutil-1     
>> -lexpat -lapr-1 -lcrypt -lpthread -lz -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
>> 
>> 
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldl
>> gmake: *** [libserf-1.la] Error 1
>> dmake:  Error code 2, while making
>> './unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_serf'
>> 
>> 
>> -ldl will tell ld to look for libdl.so, part of glibc-devel
>> in Fedora.
>> Where is this library installed on your system?
>> 
>> 
> 
> We dont use glibc, so we dont have it.
> This is covered by libc so I guess its just a matter
> f removing  -ldl. Will try tomorrow.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Pedro.
> 

Re: New Committer: Yuri Dario

[Maho NAKATA]

Yuri Dario,

congratulations!

2012/2/10 Pedro Giffuni 

> The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of committer
> Yuri Dario, ydario@ apache.org
>
> The list of all current podling committers is at:
> 
> **>.
>
> Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache
> Software Foundation:
> 
> >.
>
>
> - the Apache OpenOffice PPMC
>
>


-- 
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG:
http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

internal vs external graphite

[Maho NAKATA]

Hello Herbert,

I noticed that graphite coming with AOO distribution
is quite patched. How it and external (distro's) graphite
are different?

I'm wondering which one should use for FreeBSD.

Regards,
 Nakata Maho

Re: FreeBSD port is now builds and working

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob,

I kept silent until my commit to ports tree have been done.
And it's done. 
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/
May take a while to make it stabilize, but I'll send blog entry hopefully soon!
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Re: FreeBSD port is now builds and working
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:05:45 -0500

> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Maho NAKATA  wrote:
>> Hi Rob and Pedro,
>>
>> Ok, I can provide blog entry as well as preliminary packages for
>> FreeBSD (en version and ja version).
> 
> Excellent. Some questions a reader might have:
> 
> 0) What has been accomplished -- Lead paragraph give a good summary of
> what you've done and why it is important.  Many readers get no further
> than the first paragraph.  So anything really important, any "call to
> action" should be in the first paragraphy.
> 
> Then other questions I think users might have:
> 
> 1) What is BSD?  How many users/developers are there?
> 
> 2) What version of OpenOffice do BSD users have today?
> 
> 3) How long has OpenOffice been available on BSD?
> 
> 4) Maybe some comments on the BSD license and the Apache license
> 
> 5) How are you working with the Apache project? A fork? Working
> directly with Apache?  How is this working?
> 
> 6) What are some technical things you had to do to get the current
> OpenOffice to work with BSD?  What did you learn that other BSD
> porters for other applications might want to know about?
> 
> 7) Do you want help with anything?
> 
> 8) Where can the reader go for more information?
> 
> 
> -Rob
> 
>> Now I'm checking out the newest source...maybe packages will be available
>> on tomorrow.
>>
>> thanks
>>  Nakata Maho
>>
>> From: Rob Weir 
>> Subject: Re: FreeBSD port is now builds and working
>> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:57:09 -0500
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Maho NAKATA  wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> FreeBSD port is now builds and working.
>>>> here is a port file:
>>>> MD5 (openoffice-3-devel.20120106.4.tar.gz) = 
>>>> 472688f408d5f3d4fa7f8f97c40fcafd
>>>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/openoffice-3-devel.20120106.4.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Pedro and all!
>>>
>>> Congratulations!
>>>
>>> Do you (or Pedro) want to draft a blog post on this?
>>>
>>> It might be worth describing the history of the OOo BSD port, and what
>>> your hopes for the future are.  Also, why you like the Apache license.
>>>  If you can draft, I can help edit.
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>>>> -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO 
>>>> http://ja.openoffice.org/
>>>> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: 
>>>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
>>>
> 

Re: Configure error on FreeBSD with report builder extension

[Maho NAKATA]

Now I seem to understand... looks like licensing change;
related jar files might not compatible with Apache license.
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Maho NAKATA 
Subject: Configure error on FreeBSD with report builder extension
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:15:36 +0900 (JST)

> Hi Pedro
> 
> I'm playing configure options. when i activate
> --enable-report-builder
> ,
> configure fails like following.
> 
> checking which jfreereport libs to use (for Report Builder extension)... 
> external
> checking for /usr/share/java/sac.jar... no
> configure: error: sac.jar not found.
> 
> Could you please help me a bit?
> 
> thanks
> -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
> 

Configure error on FreeBSD with report builder extension

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro

I'm playing configure options. when i activate
--enable-report-builder
,
configure fails like following.

checking which jfreereport libs to use (for Report Builder extension)... 
external
checking for /usr/share/java/sac.jar... no
configure: error: sac.jar not found.

Could you please help me a bit?

thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

FreeBSD porting; broken at graphite

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi,

On FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE/amd64, when I enable graphite via --enable-category-b ,
I just got a strange error at graphite project like following:
-

-I/usr/local/jdk1.6.0/include/bsd -I/usr/local/jdk1.6.0/include/
linux -I/usr/local/jdk1.6.0/include/native_threads/include -I/usr/local/include 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=
no -fPIC -DNDEBUG -DTRACING -O3 -DNDEBUG -MT Font.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Font.Tpo 
-c ../src/font/Font.
cpp -o Font.o
In file included from ../src/segment/Main.h:76,
 from ../src/font/Font.cpp:18:
../include/graphite/GrFeature.h:110: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does 
not name a type
../include/graphite/GrFeature.h:111: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does 
not name a type
../include/graphite/GrFeature.h:113: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does 
not name a type
In file included from ../src/segment/Main.h:148,
 from ../src/font/Font.cpp:18:
../src/segment/GrTableManager.h:546: error: '_STL::wstring' has not been 
declared
../src/segment/GrTableManager.h:551: error: 'wstring' in namespace '_STL' does 
not name a type
In file included from ../src/segment/Main.h:149,
...
-
If you know a resolution, answer, I'm very appreciated.

thanks
 Nakata Maho

coinmp on FreeBSD

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro,

please apply following patch!

--- /dev/null   2012-01-26 22:45:15.0 +0900
+++ ext_libraries/coinmp/CoinMP-1.6.0.patch 2012-01-26 22:33:30.0 
+0900
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+--- misc/CoinMP-1.6.0/Cbc/src/CbcEventHandler.hpp  2011-06-20 
02:23:14.0 +0900
 misc/build/CoinMP-1.6.0/Cbc/src/CbcEventHandler.hpp2012-01-26 
22:17:47.0 +0900
+@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
+ */
+ 
+ #include 
++#include 
+ 
+ /* May well already be declared, but can't hurt. */
+ 
+--- misc/CoinMP-1.6.0/Cbc/src/CbcSolver.cpp2011-11-01 08:34:55.0 
+0900
 misc/build/CoinMP-1.6.0/Cbc/src/CbcSolver.cpp  2012-01-26 
22:32:46.0 +0900
+@@ -1665,10 +1665,6 @@
+   }
+   sprintf(generalPrint + strlen(generalPrint),
+   "Build Date: %s \n", __DATE__);
+-#ifdef CBC_SVN_REV
+-  sprintf(generalPrint + strlen(generalPrint),
+-  "Revision Number: %d \n", CBC_SVN_REV);
+-#endif
+ generalMessageHandler->message(CLP_GENERAL, generalMessages)
+ << generalPrint
+ << CoinMessageEol;
--- ext_libraries/coinmp/makefile.mk.org2012-01-26 22:02:39.0 
+0900
+++ ext_libraries/coinmp/makefile.mk2012-01-26 22:03:13.0 +0900
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
 BUILD_ACTION=$(GNUMAKE)
 .ENDIF
 
+PATCH_FILES=CoinMP-1.6.0.patch
+
 OUT2INC+=CoinMP$/src/CoinMP.h
 
 .IF "$(OS)"=="WNT"

Re: Updated Release QA Plan and AOO 3.4 Test Plan

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

Just a comment, can we use testtools for QA?
Unfortunately, tar balls for VCL testtool environment was gone, though,
maybe I should provide them again.
Is CVS still alive?

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 
Subject: Re: Updated Release QA Plan and AOO 3.4 Test Plan
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:07:02 +0100

> Hi,
> 
> On 11.01.2012 08:50, xia zhao wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I updated the Release QA Plan and AOO 3.4 Test Plan for your review.
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Test+Plan
>>
> 
> I have made an minor update to these wiki pages as for Windows 64 bit
> is not available/supported.
> 
> 
> Best regards, Oliver.
> 

Re: FreeBSD port is now builds and working

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob and Pedro,

Ok, I can provide blog entry as well as preliminary packages for 
FreeBSD (en version and ja version). 
Now I'm checking out the newest source...maybe packages will be available
on tomorrow.

thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Re: FreeBSD port is now builds and working
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:57:09 -0500

> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Maho NAKATA  wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> FreeBSD port is now builds and working.
>> here is a port file:
>> MD5 (openoffice-3-devel.20120106.4.tar.gz) = 472688f408d5f3d4fa7f8f97c40fcafd
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/openoffice-3-devel.20120106.4.tar.gz
>>
>> Thanks Pedro and all!
> 
> Congratulations!
> 
> Do you (or Pedro) want to draft a blog post on this?
> 
> It might be worth describing the history of the OOo BSD port, and what
> your hopes for the future are.  Also, why you like the Apache license.
>  If you can draft, I can help edit.
> 
> -Rob
> 
>> -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
>> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: 
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
> 

Re: Updated Release QA Plan and AOO 3.4 Test Plan

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

Just a comment, can we use testtools for QA?
Unfortunately, tar balls for VCL testtool environment was gone, though,
maybe I should provide them again.
Is CVS still alive?

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 
Subject: Re: Updated Release QA Plan and AOO 3.4 Test Plan
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:07:02 +0100

> Hi,
> 
> On 11.01.2012 08:50, xia zhao wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I updated the Release QA Plan and AOO 3.4 Test Plan for your review.
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Test+Plan
>>
> 
> I have made an minor update to these wiki pages as for Windows 64 bit
> is not available/supported.
> 
> 
> Best regards, Oliver.
> 

Re: R: FreeBSD port is now builds and working

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Pedro

thanks 

> There are still some nice things to do but I will prefer to do
> it in the ports tree .. so I will test and send you updates :).

Yes, you may have lot of patches to Makefile and my patches...

thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: R: FreeBSD port is now builds and working
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 08:13:17 -0800 (PST)

> Thank you Maho!!
> 
> I knew we were getting really near but I wasn't sure we would
> get it in time!
> 
> There are still some nice things to do but I will prefer to do
> it in the ports tree .. so I will test and send you updates :).
> 
> Pedro.
> 
> --- Lun 9/1/12, Maho NAKATA  ha scritto:
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> FreeBSD port is now builds and working.
>> here is a port file:
>> MD5 (openoffice-3-devel.20120106.4.tar.gz) =
>> 472688f408d5f3d4fa7f8f97c40fcafd
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/openoffice-3-devel.20120106.4.tar.gz
>> 
>> Thanks Pedro and all!
>> -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
>> http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: 
>> http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt
>> 
> 

FreeBSD port is now builds and working

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi

FreeBSD port is now builds and working.
here is a port file:
MD5 (openoffice-3-devel.20120106.4.tar.gz) = 472688f408d5f3d4fa7f8f97c40fcafd
http://accc.riken.jp/maho/openoffice-3-devel.20120106.4.tar.gz

Thanks Pedro and all!
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

main/solenv/config/sooo340.ini; do we need it?

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi All,

Pedro found that FreeBSD entry for main/solenv/config/sooo340.ini 
is missing. If I remeber correctly, I never touched this file before
when I was doing FreeBSD and MacOSX port. 

So I'd like to ask you:

do we need main/solenv/config/sooo340.ini ?

thanks
 Nakata Maho

main/solenv/config/sooo340.ini; do we need it?

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi All,

Pedro found that FreeBSD entry for main/solenv/config/sooo340.ini 
is missing. If I remeber correctly, I never touched this file before
when I was doing FreeBSD and MacOSX port. 

So I'd like to ask you:

do we need main/solenv/config/sooo340.ini ?

thanks
 Nakata Maho

Re: [VOTE] Trademark and Brand

[Maho NAKATA]

a) Apache OpenOffice.org
+1

Regards,
Nakata Maho

From: Donald Harbison 
Subject: [VOTE] Trademark and Brand
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:47:22 -0800

> As promised, here's the ballot. Choose one, cast your vote.  If none of
> them get more than 50% of the binding votes, we will start a ballot for the
> top two contenders.
> 
> a) Apache OpenOffice.org
> b) Apache OpenOffice
> c) Apache Open Office
> d) Apache Office
> 
> The ballot is open for a full 7 day week closing 12:00 p.m. EST ( UTC - 5 )
> on Wednesday, November 16, 2011.

Re: agg and epm are still in svn repo.

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: Re: agg and epm are still in svn repo.
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:43:19 -0800 (PST)

> I personally didn't plan to remove agg. I like it as
> option and license wise it's OK so I have no pland to
> remove it, at least for now.
I see.

> I did notice it's still getting built on our port and
> I have to look at why. I think when I attempt to build
> AOOo from the tarball it doesn't get built but there
> are other ugly issues with icu there.

Looks like a bug. But it is reasonable if I read the "configure.in". First, 
examine
enabling agg or not. quoting from configure.in
> AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to enable agg])
if test "$enable_agg" = "yes"; then
  AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
  AC_SUBST(ENABLE_AGG)
  ENABLE_AGG=YES
  AGG_VERSION=2400
else
  AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
  ENABLE_AGG=NO

  dnl ===
  dnl Check for system AGG
  dnl ===
  AC_MSG_CHECKING([which AGG to use])
-
but then, checks for system agg even though ENABLE_AGG=NO.
thanks


> About epm I don't know, I guess we can remove that
> directory now.
> 
> Pedro.
> 
> --- On Wed, 11/9/11, Maho NAKATA  wrote:
> 
>> From: Maho NAKATA 
>> Subject: agg and epm are still in svn repo.
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: p...@apache.org
>> Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2011, 7:47 PM
>> Hi,
>> while porting AOOo to FreeBSD, pgf@ noticed that
>> agg and epm are still in svn repo.
>> is it correct? Should we remove them?
>> 
>> thanks
>>  Nakata Maho
>> 
> 

agg and epm are still in svn repo.

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi,
while porting AOOo to FreeBSD, pgf@ noticed that
agg and epm are still in svn repo.
is it correct? Should we remove them?

thanks
 Nakata Maho

Re: Problem building main/sal/cppunittester

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi,
I reprodced this..cppunit you use is external one.
thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: Problem building main/sal/cppunittester
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 21:41:00 -0700 (PDT)

> Hi;
> 
> I am advancing slowly through the FreeBSD build
> and I found this:
> 
> ...
> 
> Entering 
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/work/ooo/main/sal/cppunittester
> 
> Making:    all_cppunittester.dpobj
> Compiling: sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/memory:53,
>                  from 
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/work/ooo/main/solver/340/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/stl/preextstl.h:52,
>                  from 
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/work/ooo/main/sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:48:
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: template argument 2 is 
> invalid
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:321: error: expected unqualified-id 
> before '>' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: template argument 2 is 
> invalid
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:326: error: expected unqualified-id 
> before '>' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: template declaration of 
> 'typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_if::__value, 
> _CharT*>::__type std::__copy_aux'
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: 'istreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
> primary-expression before '>' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:331: error: expected 
> primary-expression
> ./usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected 
> primary-expression before '*' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:332: error: expected 
> primary-expression before ')' token
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: 'ostreambuf_iterator' 
> was not declared in this scope
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: template argument 2 is 
> invalid
> /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:407: error: expected unqualified-id 
> before '>' token
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/work/ooo/main/sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:
>  In function 'int sal_main()':
> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/work/ooo/main/sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:139:
>  error: no matching function for call to 
> 'CppUnit::PlugInManager::load(_STL::string)'
> /usr/local/include/cppunit/plugin/PlugInManager.h:47: note: candidates are: 
> void CppUnit::PlugInManager::load(const std::string&, const 
> CppUnit::PlugInParameters&
> dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../unxfbsdx.pro/obj/cppunittester.obj'
> 
> 1 module(s): 
> sal
> 
> ...
> 
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Pedro.
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal

[Maho NAKATA]

No problem, it was my mistake, too, unfortunately.
Next time, i'll be more careful.
Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" 
Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULT] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:17:32 -0700

> That's unfortunate.  I took Maho Nakata as showing support for that 
> particular 
> discussion and did not mark it as a vote to record.
> 
> I failed to consider that he meant to vote on the [VOTE] thread, and I had 
> forgotten that he had not voted there when I was tallying votes.
> 
> Technically, I cannot change it now.  Please accept my apologies.
> 
> I trust the outcome is fully satisfactory anyhow.  Maho Nakata's assistance 
> will be very important in the coming week as preparation and migration occur.
> 
> With apologies,
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Kazunari Hirano [mailto:khir...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 21:48
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
> 
> Hi Dennis,
> 
> I think Maho Nakata meant +1 to the proposal by the following post.
> http://s.apache.org/XpZ
> 
> Thanks,
> khirano

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal - Inclusiveness

[Maho NAKATA]

+1

Just a note: I am a global moderator of OpenOffice.org Community Forum
Japanese.
http://user.services.openoffice.org/ja/forum/

Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" 
Subject: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Acceptance of the OpenOffice.org Proposal - 
Inclusiveness
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:43:05 -0700

> Thanks Ross, I wish to correct what I have done:
> 
> THE IMPORTANT PART
> 
> Please, anyone: If you wish to have your preference known concerning this 
> proposal, please cast a vote.  It establishes a sense of what overall 
> participation in ooo-dev and others think concerning the acceptance of the 
> proposal.  The PPMC will definitely pay attention, as will all observers. 
> That's an important contribution available to all who receive this message.
> 
> Note that I have changed this message to the [VOTE][DISCUSS] where anyone is 
> welcome to speak up on the voting itself.  Please use the [VOTE] thread for 
> voting, the way that all voters have done so far.
> 
>  - Dennis
> 
> BACKGROUND ON HOW THE APPROACH WAS TAKEN
> 
> I thought it important to provide the distinction around binding votes 
> because 
> this is not on a private list where all votes are clear.  My model was the 
> vote held on gene...@incubator.apache.org as part of the acceptance of 
> OpenOffice.org as an Apache podling.  That is my only experience of a [P]PMC 
> Vote conducted on a public discussion list.
> 
> With regard to listing the PPMC: The PPMC roster is not currently visible 
> outside of the PPMC.  It seemed important for others to have a sense of who 
> this Project Management Committee is.  I think it is rather a mystery for the 
> OpenOffice.org Forum operators and also many other ooo-dev visitors.  There 
> is 
> consensus to list the PPMC on the OpenOffice.org Incubator Status page. I 
> though it useful to make the roster available earlier in conjunction with 
> this 
> event.
> 
> I regret any suggestion that anyone's vote is unimportant. I apologize.  All 
> votes will be tallied.  In presenting the results, I will differentiate the 
> PPMC-cast votes.  I did not want to surprise someone who was expecting some 
> different way of determining the outcome.  This is not straw poll. It is a 
> vote of the PPMC to accept a proposal on behalf of the project.  I suppose it 
> is a PPMC vote with a straw poll of all of the ooo-dev subscribers and other 
> posters thrown in.
> 
> Please, anyone: If you wish to have your preference known concerning this 
> proposal, please cast a vote.  It establishes a sense of what overall 
> participation in ooo-dev and others think concerning the acceptance of the 
> proposal.  The PPMC will definitely pay attention, as will all observers. 
> That's an important contribution available to all who receive this message.
> 
>  - Dennis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 15:51
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: How voting works...
> 
> I'm not going to dig into all the details of how a vote is called in the ASF.
> 
> In posting this I am not asking for the current vote to be recalled,
> there is no need.
> 
> I am just wanting to flag something that concerns me about how the
> vote was called (and as per usual this is just advice from a mentor,
> these are not rules that must be adopted).
> 
> In an ASF community everyone is entitled to an opinion. Everyone
> should be encouraged to express that opinion in a formal vote, just as
> much as they should be encouraged to express their opinions in day to
> day discussion.
> 
> It is true that only some members of the community have binding votes.
> However, this only becomes important in the event of an absence of
> community consensus.
> 
> Therefore, when calling a vote please do not word it in such a way
> that implies others in the community do not have a vote that counts.
> It does count. A responsible PPMC member will use their own vote to
> support any appropriate objections from the community. They can only
> do that if the community is encouraged to express their views
> alongside everyone else..
> 
> Specifically, there is no need to define binding votes in the vote
> thread, the way Apache Projects vote is well documented and, over
> time, the AOOo project will gain its own guidelines. Secondly, do not
> list the people who are "important" enough to have a binding vote.
> Thirdly, explicitly call for all community members to express their
> preferences in the vote.
> 
> In other words, make every action of the PPMC as inclusive as possible.
> 
> Finally, Denis - thank you for calling the vote.
> 
> Ross
> 
> -- 
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:56
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE][DISCUSS] Acceptance of the O

Re: Good-Day site is gone...

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Marcus, and *
I was informed by former employer, and unfortunately, Good-day was gone.
best,
 Nakata Maho

From: "Marcus (OOo)" 
Subject: Re: Good-Day site is gone...
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:49:58 +0200

> Am 10/17/2011 01:23 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 10/17/2011 02:53 AM, schrieb Maho NAKATA:
>>>
>>>   I'm looking for ftp site so that I can upload my taball for QA
>>>   purpose.
>>>> (and for my builds, too).
>>>> The Good-day ftp server is gone in August 2011, so I cannot upload my
>>>> builds
>>>> as well.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm very sorry to hear that because it was always a reliable host. And
>>> now
>>> even "www.good-day.net" is not reachable. What happened here?
>>
>>
>> I think Good-day was a Japanese organization/company that provided
>> free
>> hosting to Maho. Good Day Inc. in Umeda
>> Osaka. http://www.good-day.co.jp/
> 
> I know. We had a good collaboration about mirroring at Sun/Oracle
> times. I'm a bit frightened about the "was". ;-)
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> 
>>>   Note: I have been uploading source tar ball for each milestones, and
>>>> uploading MacOSX PPC and Intel packages for all languages for almost
>>>> every
>>>> milestones over 6 years. To do that, Good-day ftp site was very
>>>> important
>>>> and useful.
>>>>
>>>
>>> As Ross said your "http://people.apache.org"; acccount could be an
>>> intermediate place to host builds on a temporary basis. Otherwise we
>>> have to
>>> find somewhere else a bit space for build hosting.
>>>
>>> Marcus
> 

Re: Legacy OOo SVN

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Andrea Pescetti 
Subject: Re: Legacy OOo SVN
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:49:48 +0200

> On 17/10/2011 Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> From: Rob Weir
>>> I'm told that before SVN the project used CVS.  Is it worth backing
>>> that up as well?
>> Yes, sure. Some projects like native lang projects
>> are not covered by SVN.
> 
> What exactly is not covered by SVN in the Native-Lang projects? The
> Italian N-L project used CVS for the website content only, but that
> one was converted to SVN (a fresh import, dropping all history) with
> the Kenai migration and it is still working correctly.

Oh - I forgot that. Some of the history of NLs are dropped...

thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: Good-Day site is gone...

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: Re: Good-Day site is gone...
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:16:30 -0700 (PDT)

> I think this is very important. unfortunately I do not
> think we can use Apache servers/mirrors for this until
> we have gone through the IP clearance process.

Arrgh.

> BTW, Perhaps we could consider putting up torrents?
Sorry, torrent is prohibited in RIKEN.
(Note: I can do ooo related stuffs at RIKEN if my duties are done.)

Anyway I can put distfiles at FreeBSD.org and put very small numbers
of archives.

thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: Legacy OOo SVN

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Legacy OOo SVN
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:32:44 -0400

> I want to make sure we're not duplicating effort here.  I've been
> working with Pedro to take the legacy OOo SVN repository (pre Hg) and
> get it onto Apache-Extras.  I'm doing this via svnsync, a slow
> process, but it will preserve the revision history.
> 
> It should be done in a few more days.
> 
> We should think about putting a link to this repository, along with a
> link to the back up Hg repository, on our website here:
> 
> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/source.html
> 
> It should probably have a suitable disclaimer that this is the legacy
> code, not the project's code, not ALv2, etc., but having access to the
> history is useful.
> 
> I'm told that before SVN the project used CVS.  Is it worth backing
> that up as well?
Yes, sure. Some projects like native lang projects
are not covered by SVN.

thanks

Good-Day site is gone...

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi, 
I'm looking for ftp site so that I can upload my taball for QA purpose.
(and for my builds, too).
The Good-day ftp server is gone in August 2011, so I cannot upload my builds
as well.

Note: I have been uploading source tar ball for each milestones, and
uploading MacOSX PPC and Intel packages for all languages for almost every
milestones over 6 years. To do that, Good-day ftp site was very important
and useful.

thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Linux (Ubuntu 10.04/i386) build was successful.

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi
just FYI, my Linux (Ubuntu 10.04/i386) build was successful.
cf. http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/e/5ea36fa8cd22d8f559b0ffb041c43a9e
thanks!

Re: Legacy OOo SVN

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Rob Weir 
Subject: Legacy OOo SVN
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:32:44 -0400

> I want to make sure we're not duplicating effort here.  I've been
> working with Pedro to take the legacy OOo SVN repository (pre Hg) and
> get it onto Apache-Extras.  I'm doing this via svnsync, a slow
> process, but it will preserve the revision history.
> 
> It should be done in a few more days.
> 
> We should think about putting a link to this repository, along with a
> link to the back up Hg repository, on our website here:
> 
> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/source.html
> 
> It should probably have a suitable disclaimer that this is the legacy
> code, not the project's code, not ALv2, etc., but having access to the
> history is useful.
> 
> I'm told that before SVN the project used CVS.  Is it worth backing
> that up as well?
Yes, sure. Some projects like native lang projects
are not covered by SVN.

thanks

Re: FreeBSD's OOo Port (mostly) in

[Maho NAKATA]

Thank you! Pedro
Nakata Maho

From: Pedro Giffuni 
Subject: FreeBSD's OOo Port (mostly) in
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:24:25 -0700 (PDT)

> Hello guys;
> 
> You might have noticed recently a nice train of about 16
> commits carefully labelled i - FreeBSD Port: ..."
> 
> It's of course, the core of FreeBSD's port, with still
> some minor patches missing that need to be verified
> closely by someone that knows better.
> 
> The patches were carefully coded in order not to affect
> other ports so nothing should have broken (famous last
> words) and everything was referenced from our bugzilla
> database so we can trace things very well.
> 
> I personally have to thank ENORMOUSLY Maho Nakata
> (maho@) for his incredible dedication and patience
> working on FreeBSD's OOo port over all these years.
> 
> It's a real honor to have him around here in OpenOffice
> and in FreeBSD!
> 
> Pedro.
> 

Re: Introduction and start working

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 
Subject: Re: Introduction and start working
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:08:01 +0200

> Hi Nakata Maho,
> 
> thanks for the welcome.
> 
> Until last Friday I had a 21" iMac PowerPC on my home desk, but now it
> has been replaced by a new 27" iMac Intel.
> Thus, my PPC iMac is more or less retired, but if needed I can wake
> this machine up ;-)

Congratulations for having Intel Mac. I still have PPC, but I really do 
retire to use PPC any more, too...
Now I really love my new MacBookAir 11'...even I switched from FreeBSD as the 
Desktop OS.
Thanks
 Nakata Maho

> Best regards, Oliver.
> 
> On 20.09.2011 13:39, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hello Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>>
>> I'm very happy to work with you, again, and congratulations
>> for new position at IBM. Do you still use PPC based Mac?
>> Recently I bought MacBookAir and it is really nice laptop.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Nakata Maho
>>
>> 2011/9/20 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am Oliver-Rainer Wittmann, living in a small town near Hamburg,
>>> Germany,
>>> and I want to join Apache OpenOffice.
>>>
>>> In the last nine years I was working in Sun's/Oracle's OpenOffice.org
>>> development team as a software developer. My main focus was on the
>>> word
>>> processing component Writer and on the OpenDocument support for this
>>> component.
>>> May be you know me from one of the last OpenOffice.org conferences
>>> (OOoCons)
>>> which I attended since 2008 as a speaker.
>>> May be you know me as o...@openoffice.org as the Co-Lead of the
>>> OpenOffice.org
>>> Writer project.
>>> May be you know me from the OASIS ODF TC - the technical committee
>>> which is
>>> responsible for the OpenDocument file format - on which I have been an
>>> active member since December 2006 until this early summer.
>>>
>>> After same change acceptance in the last months I have got the
>>> possibility
>>> to continue my engagement in OpenOffice, now under the Apache
>>> Foundation, as
>>> an employee of IBM. I am aiming to be a valuable contributor to this
>>> project.
>>>
>>> I will start working on a consolidation of the Windows Build software
>>> requirements as given on
>>> http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows:
>>> - get rid of dependence on unicows.dll
>>> -- take over issue 88652
>>> (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=88652) from Mathias and
>>> perform the given tasks.
>>> - get rid of dependence on instmsiw.exe and instmsia.exe
>>> -- I did not find any reference to these files in the sources. On my
>>> -- system
>>> (Windows 7) I have done a build without them and successfully
>>> installed this
>>> built version. Thus, I will provide a corresponding patch which only
>>> removes
>>> the check for the existence of these files in the configure script. I
>>> will
>>> ask others for verification on their Windows system, if a build and a
>>> following installation is still possible.
>>> Please let me know, if somebody else is already working on these
>>> things or
>>> if you have any remarks, pros, cons, ...
>>>
>>> Afterwards, I will have a closer look at
>>> http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration. I will work on
>>> certain
>>> items of it starting with:
>>> - A lot of stuff is mentioned (and marked as solved) on this page which
>>> - only
>>> needs to be done as proposed and discussed on this list, but as far as
>>> I can
>>> see not yet been done.
>>> Please let me know your remarks or objections.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am looking forward to good collaboration and building close
>>> relationships.
>>>
>>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>>
> 

Re: Reintroducing myself to the OOo community

[Maho NAKATA]

Congratulations, and I'm very happy to hear that you'll work
with again OOo. We Japanese community respect you very much.
Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Herbert Duerr 
Subject: Reintroducing myself to the OOo community
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:02:58 +0200

> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to reintroduce myself as participant in the OpenOffice
> community in my new role as an IBM employee. Even before that change I
> worked on OOo for over ten years. You can find out more details about
> me at http://de.linkedin.com/pub/herbert-duerr/32/794/a05 where my
> professional profile is hosted.
> 
> My specialities are i18n, text, graphics, platform integration,
> algorithms, performance, debugging, keeping backward compatibility and
> careful refactoring. These are incredibly huge topics by themselves,
> but I'm not afraid to delve into other areas when I see the need.
> 
> Most of the key players in the OOo/LO world know and respect me. I am
> happy that I can continue to work fulltime on our favourite project
> and I like it even more that this open source work happens under the
> well-run framework of the renowned Apache foundation as I appreciate
> its proven and meritocratic structure. I especially understand the
> foundations point of view on licensing which allows companies to
> contribute for the common good who otherwise couldn't dare to touch
> such a project if it had a more restrictive license.
> 
> I have many ideas on how to improve our productivity suite and am
> ready to do what needs to be done. Here are some of the topics in
> their most terse form: regexp remediation, assisting symphony
> integration, interoperability, layout stability, portion to lower
> layers, text justification, performance/scalability, better system
> integration esp. for graphics, optional OpenType features, unicode
> variation selectors, coretext, harfbuzz, 64bit win and mac, better
> filters and many more. I invite you to cooperate at least in these
> areas as they will benefit all related projects.
> 
> Best regards,
> Herbert Duerr
> 

Re: Build AOOo on Mac OS X 10.7

[Maho NAKATA]

default installation of Lion on many machines are 64bit.
OOo for MacOSX is intended to be 32bit.
this point is also important notice.
thanks

2011/9/24 Chao Huang :
> Another request to build AOOo on 10.7 is to solve the special issue on Mac 
> 10.7.
>
>
> 2011/9/23 Chao Huang :
>> hi, Nakata
>>
>> The latested Mac machine can not install 10.6 and 10.5. So if I want
>> to debug AOOo on that machine, I have to pass the full build on 10.7
>> firstly.
>>
>> Apple disabled JDK1.5 on 10.6 and cast off gcc-4.0 in Mac 10.7. In my
>> opinion, it's a gradual request to upgrade the build env to gcc-4.2
>> and JDK1.6.
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/23 Maho NAKATA :
>>> Hi Chao Huang, just curious but why do you want to build on OSX 10.7 Lion?
>>> I have been building on Tiger (10.4) but many builds on Leopard.
>>> I think you should better start on older OS.
>>> Thanks
>>>  Nakata Maho
>>>
>>> From: Chao Huang 
>>> Subject: Re: Build AOOo on Mac OS X 10.7
>>> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:23:17 +0800
>>>
>>>> hi, Michael
>>>>
>>>> Thank you a lot for sharing this kind of helpful information. I will
>>>> have a try and share the result with you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2011/9/22 Michael Stahl :
>>>>> On 22.09.2011 08:49, Chao Huang wrote:
>>>>>> hi, all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mac OS X 10.7, I'm trying to build AOOo in following steps as I did
>>>>>> on Mac OS 10.6/10.5 :
>>>>>
>>>>>>    4) there will be a break with error message (due to the restriction
>>>>>> of gcc version 4.0 in configure)
>>>>>>            checking for gcc... /usr/bin/gcc
>>>>>>            checking the GNU gcc compiler version... configure: error:
>>>>>> You need to use the gcc-4.0 compiler (gcc 4.2.1 won't work with the
>>>>>> MacOSX10.4u.sdk) - set CC accordingly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems like that there is only gcc-4.2.1 in Mac OS X 10.7 with Xcode
>>>>>> 4.1. The "MacOSX10.4u.sdk" is not supported by Mac OS X 10.7. There
>>>>>> are only "MacOSX10.6.sdk" and "MacOSX10.7.sdk" under dir
>>>>>> "/Developer/SDKs".
>>>>>>            $ ls /usr/bin/gcc*
>>>>>>            /usr/bin/gcc               /usr/bin/gcc-4.2
>>>>>
>>>>> it is apparently possible to download and install the OS X 10.4 SDK even
>>>>> on OS X 10.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://catacombae.blogspot.com/2011/07/installing-xcode-326-in-mac-os-x-lion.html
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm going to remove the gcc-4.0 restriction and restart building.
>>>>>
>>>>> there was a discussion some time ago on a different mailing list on this
>>>>> topic; it should give you some ideas about the advantages and
>>>>> disadvantages of doing this:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/14099
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there anyone who built out AOOo successfully on Mac OS X 10.7
>>>>>> (Intel) ? Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> haven't heard of anybody doing that.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>  michael
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chao Huang
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chao Huang
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Chao Huang
>

Re: Build AOOo on Mac OS X 10.7

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Chao Huang, just curious but why do you want to build on OSX 10.7 Lion?
I have been building on Tiger (10.4) but many builds on Leopard.
I think you should better start on older OS.
Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: Chao Huang 
Subject: Re: Build AOOo on Mac OS X 10.7
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:23:17 +0800

> hi, Michael
> 
> Thank you a lot for sharing this kind of helpful information. I will
> have a try and share the result with you.
> 
> 
> 2011/9/22 Michael Stahl :
>> On 22.09.2011 08:49, Chao Huang wrote:
>>> hi, all
>>>
>>> On Mac OS X 10.7, I'm trying to build AOOo in following steps as I did
>>> on Mac OS 10.6/10.5 :
>>
>>>    4) there will be a break with error message (due to the restriction
>>> of gcc version 4.0 in configure)
>>>            checking for gcc... /usr/bin/gcc
>>>            checking the GNU gcc compiler version... configure: error:
>>> You need to use the gcc-4.0 compiler (gcc 4.2.1 won't work with the
>>> MacOSX10.4u.sdk) - set CC accordingly
>>>
>>> It seems like that there is only gcc-4.2.1 in Mac OS X 10.7 with Xcode
>>> 4.1. The "MacOSX10.4u.sdk" is not supported by Mac OS X 10.7. There
>>> are only "MacOSX10.6.sdk" and "MacOSX10.7.sdk" under dir
>>> "/Developer/SDKs".
>>>            $ ls /usr/bin/gcc*
>>>            /usr/bin/gcc               /usr/bin/gcc-4.2
>>
>> it is apparently possible to download and install the OS X 10.4 SDK even
>> on OS X 10.7.
>>
>> http://catacombae.blogspot.com/2011/07/installing-xcode-326-in-mac-os-x-lion.html
>>
>>> I'm going to remove the gcc-4.0 restriction and restart building.
>>
>> there was a discussion some time ago on a different mailing list on this
>> topic; it should give you some ideas about the advantages and
>> disadvantages of doing this:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/14099
>>
>>> Is there anyone who built out AOOo successfully on Mac OS X 10.7
>>> (Intel) ? Thanks!
>>
>> haven't heard of anybody doing that.
>>
>> regards,
>>  michael
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chao Huang
> 

Re: Introduction and start working

[Maho NAKATA]

Hello Oliver-Rainer Wittmann

I'm very happy to work with you, again, and congratulations
for new position at IBM. Do you still use PPC based Mac?
Recently I bought MacBookAir and it is really nice laptop.

Regards,
 Nakata Maho

2011/9/20 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann :
> Hi,
>
> I am Oliver-Rainer Wittmann, living in a small town near Hamburg, Germany,
> and I want to join Apache OpenOffice.
>
> In the last nine years I was working in Sun's/Oracle's OpenOffice.org
> development team as a software developer. My main focus was on the word
> processing component Writer and on the OpenDocument support for this
> component.
> May be you know me from one of the last OpenOffice.org conferences (OOoCons)
> which I attended since 2008 as a speaker.
> May be you know me as o...@openoffice.org as the Co-Lead of the OpenOffice.org
> Writer project.
> May be you know me from the OASIS ODF TC - the technical committee which is
> responsible for the OpenDocument file format - on which I have been an
> active member since December 2006 until this early summer.
>
> After same change acceptance in the last months I have got the possibility
> to continue my engagement in OpenOffice, now under the Apache Foundation, as
> an employee of IBM. I am aiming to be a valuable contributor to this
> project.
>
> I will start working on a consolidation of the Windows Build software
> requirements as given on
> http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows:
> - get rid of dependence on unicows.dll
> -- take over issue 88652
> (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=88652) from Mathias and
> perform the given tasks.
> - get rid of dependence on instmsiw.exe and instmsia.exe
> -- I did not find any reference to these files in the sources. On my system
> (Windows 7) I have done a build without them and successfully installed this
> built version. Thus, I will provide a corresponding patch which only removes
> the check for the existence of these files in the configure script. I will
> ask others for verification on their Windows system, if a build and a
> following installation is still possible.
> Please let me know, if somebody else is already working on these things or
> if you have any remarks, pros, cons, ...
>
> Afterwards, I will have a closer look at
> http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/ApacheMigration. I will work on certain
> items of it starting with:
> - A lot of stuff is mentioned (and marked as solved) on this page which only
> needs to be done as proposed and discussed on this list, but as far as I can
> see not yet been done.
> Please let me know your remarks or objections.
>
>
> I am looking forward to good collaboration and building close relationships.
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>

Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Pavel Janík 
Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +0200

> 
> On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
> 
>> unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,open the file of COPYING,
> 
> Where you have got this file?

http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libc/glibc-2.1.3.tar.gz
GPL, not LGPL.
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: [PROPOSAL] Set up of ooo-dev-ja at incubator.apache.org

[Maho NAKATA]

+1 from Nakata Maho,
since it's very important to have a channel in each language.
Thanks,
 Nakata Maho

2011/9/8 Kazunari Hirano :
> Hi all,
>
> I propose setting up of ooo-dev-ja at incubator.apache.org
>
> As Japanese OpenOffice.org mailing lists such as
> us...@ja.openoffice.org, annou...@ja.openoffice.org,
> d...@ja.openoffice.org, disc...@ja.openoffice.org,
> documentat...@ja.openoffice.org, market...@ja.openoffice.org,
> q...@ja.openoffice.org, transl...@ja.openoffice.org, will be closed, I
> would like to invite subscribers
> on those lists to ooo-dev-ja at incubator.apache.org.
>
> We have many subscribers (users and contributors) who don't read
> English on those Japanese lists.  We would like to use the list,
> ooo-dev-ja at incubator.apache.org, to discuss "in Japanese" many
> things related to Apache OpenOffice.org.
> 1) To understand the proposal
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal/ja
> 2) To understand the status
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html
> 3) To read and navigate pages on the site
> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/
> 4) To learn Apache way, Apache License and more about Apache
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> 5) To learn how to use wikis
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOODEV/
> http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/wiki/JA/
> 6) To discuss about the forum and the mailing list.
> 7) To discuss about translation, QA, marketing, documentation around and
> after AOOo release.
> 8) To learn SVN, how to get source code, how to build AOOo
>
> Generally we will discuss how to manage things on the list with
> Japanese users and contributors.  Then Japanese AOOo users and AOOo
> developers and AOOo contributors can understand Apache OpenOffice.org
> project and discuss how to make AOOo the product and community better
> "in Japanese" involving Japanese users and contributors who don't read
> English.
>
> We would like to use the list where we can discuss "in Japanese"
> everything related AOOo like how to use it, bug reports, feature
> requests and ask subscribers to help develop Japanese AOOo the product
> and the community.  Many Japanese people and Japanese OpenOffie.org
> users and Japanese media will read the list in Japanese and understand
> what is AOOo incubator project and what is happening in the project.
>
> ooo-dev-ja at incubator.apache.org will be not only a good
> communication tool but a good marketing tool, a support tool and
> working place for Japanese users and contributors and Japanese people.
>
> I also propose 2 moderators for ooo-dev-ja at incubator.apache.org
> 1. Kazunari Hirano
> 2. Maho Nakata
>
> If there are no objections to the above proposal within 72-hours then
> I will invoke Lazy Consensus and will create a JIRA issue.
>
> Thanks,
> khirano
>

Re: [Repo][Proposal]After the code is checked in to SVN

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Mathias,

Is it the time to push FreeBSD patches?
Now I'm at Dener to attend a conference, and just now my talk has finished.
I'll work when I go back to Japan. Maybe next Monday or so.

Best regards,
Nakata Maho

2011/8/30 Mathias Bauer :
> Am 29.08.2011 17:30, schrieb Eike Rathke:
>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Monday, 2011-08-29 09:27:21 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> In particular, we now have unrelated changes intermingled with the
>>> addition of missing files from Hg.  This means that there is no
>>> revision in SVN that is identical to the Hg tip. This is unfortunate.
>>> It will make some approaches to merging more difficult.
>>
>> Then I'll step back from doing any work until the CWSs are integrated.
>> If the code doesn't compile on my platform I won't be able to help with
>> integrating CWSs. Unless I'm not expected to compile the resulting code,
>> which I doubt.
>
> No reason to do so Eike, we are already behind that.
>
> The agreed plan was to add the missing files before we even compile and
> fix something and the list of files was known already. But that can't be
> done anymore as other patches are there, so let's forget it.
>
> The current job should be to compile the code on as many platforms as
> possible and to replace or remove copyleft components and code. Thanks
> to your commits we already made some progress and so let's continue to
> do so.
>
> Regards,
> Mathias
>

Re: Native Language vs l10n

[Maho NAKATA]

From: Kazunari Hirano 
Subject: Re: Native Language vs l10n
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:20:06 +0900

> Hi Dennis and all,
> 
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>  wrote:
>> Hello, Khirano-san (that OK with nickname/UserID?),
> OK :)  See the bottom of this mail.
> 
>> I was wondering if SVN and Bugzilla infrastructure could be in separate 
>> Internet site
>> from Japanese Language Project (or vice versa).
> I see. But I can not answer this question immediately.
> I would like to discuss the question with Maho Nakata, Japanese
> Language Project Lead.
> Please give me time.

Hi Dennis,

I am the project lead of ja.openoffice.org and qa.openoffice.org.
JA used "cvs" instead of "svn", anyway they are the same meaning in this case.
We (or over 100 of every native language project) managed our web page
using SVN. These are projects within OpenOffice.org, so we should not work
separately. English speaking community cannot handle everything, especially
translation, quality assurance, documentation and marketing.

I think Bugzilla can be worked separately. In JA project, if someone found an 
issue
to that project, then fill the Bugzilla. However, these were rarely filed, or 
mistakingly
filed. If I remember correctly, ES community make use of Bugzilla for assigning
task to community members to see what is the status. This is a good/correct use 
of Bugzilla.
I think such use of Bugzilla is not popular, as there are relatively small 
numbers of 
people who can commit, and when casual participants find errors on the web page 
etc,
these committers have fix these errors ASAP.

thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: So what about QA?

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob

I'm a QA project lead, http://qa.openoffice.org/

From: RA Stehmann 
Subject: Re: So what about QA?
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:42:50 +0200

> Rob Weir schrieb:
>> We've had a lot of discussions from the dev, documentation, education,
>> translation/localization perspectives.  But I haven't really heard
>> anything about testing.
>> 
>> Could someone brief us on how QA was handled with OOo?  Was it a
>> community effort?  Or was it done by Sun/Oracle? Was there any test
>> automation?  Or was it manual?  Are there test documents available?
>> Are there unit/pre-integration tests?  Or are they mainly tests of the
>> integrated product?
>> 
>> And given what was done before, what worked well and should be done
>> the same way in Apache?  And what didn't work so well and should be
>> changed?
>> 
> As I'm married with the Person, which is in authority for the QA in the
> germanophone community, I want to give my 2 cents.
> 
> QA was done by SUN/Oracle and the community.

Right.
See also, what is done in QA in Hamburg (Oracle) can be found:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2008/programme/thursday_1416.odp
.
S
> The development collateral QA was mostly done by employees of
> SUN/Oracle, but in some cases also members of the community test so
> called cws-builds.

> Testing of the milestones, betas and release canditates was done by die
> natural language communities. 

and Hamburg as well.

http://quaste.services.openoffice.org/
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QUASTe

QATrack 
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QATrack
http://qatrack.services.openoffice.org/

> We have some tools for doing and
> organizing the testing esp. scripts for automatic tests.

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/VCLTesttool

We have also done manual tests, at TCM.
http://quaste.services.openoffice.org/tcm/tcm_login.cgi?tcm_config=newooo
we define test cases, and check by volunteers by hands.

Other than that
Pavel Janik and myself have been providing builds for every milestones so
that we can test OpenOffice.org for minor languages and platforms.

> Mechtilde as the Ansprechpartner (contact person) QA of the germanophone
> community decides finally what germanophone versions (Win, Solaris, deb,
> rpm etc.) will be released, But their was no controversy about that in
> the past.

Enoki Shinji was the QA manager of the Japanese language project. 

> The general decision whether a milestone is good enough to be released
> as beta or final version was found in the release status meeting. In
> this IRC-meetings was a great effort to find a consensus.

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ReleaseStatus_Minutes

Thanks,
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt

Re: So what about QA?

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi Rob

I'm a QA project lead, http://qa.openoffice.org/

From: RA Stehmann 
Subject: Re: So what about QA?
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:42:50 +0200

> Rob Weir schrieb:
>> We've had a lot of discussions from the dev, documentation, education,
>> translation/localization perspectives.  But I haven't really heard
>> anything about testing.
>> 
>> Could someone brief us on how QA was handled with OOo?  Was it a
>> community effort?  Or was it done by Sun/Oracle? Was there any test
>> automation?  Or was it manual?  Are there test documents available?
>> Are there unit/pre-integration tests?  Or are they mainly tests of the
>> integrated product?
>> 
>> And given what was done before, what worked well and should be done
>> the same way in Apache?  And what didn't work so well and should be
>> changed?
>> 
> As I'm married with the Person, which is in authority for the QA in the
> germanophone community, I want to give my 2 cents.
> 
> QA was done by SUN/Oracle and the community.

Right.
See also, what is done in QA in Hamburg (Oracle) can be found:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2008/programme/thursday_1416.odp
.
S
> The development collateral QA was mostly done by employees of
> SUN/Oracle, but in some cases also members of the community test so
> called cws-builds.

> Testing of the milestones, betas and release canditates was done by die
> natural language communities. 

and Hamburg as well.

http://quaste.services.openoffice.org/
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QUASTe

QATrack 
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QATrack
http://qatrack.services.openoffice.org/

> We have some tools for doing and
> organizing the testing esp. scripts for automatic tests.

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/VCLTesttool

We have also done manual tests, at TCM.
http://quaste.services.openoffice.org/tcm/tcm_login.cgi?tcm_config=newooo
we define test cases, and check by volunteers by hands.

Other than that
Pavel Janik and myself have been providing builds for every milestones so
that we can test OpenOffice.org for minor languages and platforms.

> Mechtilde as the Ansprechpartner (contact person) QA of the germanophone
> community decides finally what germanophone versions (Win, Solaris, deb,
> rpm etc.) will be released, But their was no controversy about that in
> the past.

Enoki Shinji was the QA manager of the Japanese language project. 

> The general decision whether a milestone is good enough to be released
> as beta or final version was found in the release status meeting. In
> this IRC-meetings was a great effort to find a consensus.

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ReleaseStatus_Minutes

Thanks,
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/
http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt